Diane bukowski is the "Joke of the Motor City" . The jury found her guilty because she did it. Bukowski is a babling iddiotte! VoD (Voice of Detroit) is Filled with lies and hatred for the community of Wayne County. Like FrankeeFraud says < Aww,Shut the FUCK up, You Ugly Polack Bitch!
Funny, a JURY convicted her. Not the prosecutor's office, not the police, but the common citizens of Wayne Co. Her outbursts lack incredibility, and her main intend is to stir hatred amongst us.
Blue, juries only decide on what the prosecution and judge allows them to see. Doesn't it bother you (or did you know) that the fact that the police destroyed evidence (her pictures) and that the prosecution didn't include any evidence at all? If she stepped in blood, why didn't they bring in her shoes? The cops said there were so many people that they were in danger pulling cops off of crownd control, so how come there were no other witnesses to back up what the cops alleged?
I've heard many stories from people I trust of much worse behavior when I wasn't around. I don't know anyone personally who is in prison -- guilty or innocent -- so if that's your measure, you'll win your argument every time. That's the whole point -- if enough people understood or had an interest in these cases, they would be stopped. It's a system that develops between institutions --shedding light tends to clean it up. What hope is there of that when folks like yourself "shoot the messenger"?
Dude, you're losing it. Have you not been paying attention to the news with respect to DNA evidence clearing people who were on death row? If people are sitting on death row who are beyond a doubt innocent, how hard is it to buy that the same is true for lesser offenses? I personally have only ever witnessed harassing behavior that I wouldn't have believed from the police when in public with people who weren't white, male protestants.
By the way, when I mention the OJ trial, I'm not commenting on the validity or lack thereof of the outcome. I'm talking about how shocking it was for me and folks like me -- and I think what this woman is saying goes to shedding some light on an aspect of our society that most of us live in ignorant bliss of. If you knew of literally 100s of cases where innocent people were sent to jail and had their lives ruined, you could maybe start to see that trial through the eyes of many of the jurors.
You're saying that because American black people may have suffered injustices in the past that, on any given occasion, a jury has the right to correct those injustices by overlooking the specifics of the individual case before their purview. Your argument is that sympathy is an excuse for injustice.
Nope, I'm saying that watching people you know are innocent get railroaded into long prison terms by a colluding police and judicial system can make you MUCH more skeptical about what representatives from those two institutions tell you in a court of law. I'm saying that those of us on the "inside" who think the our officers don't behave this way have a hard time fathoming why anyone might doubt their word. I'm saying that what she's describing is less rare than you imagine.
This is the dark underbelly of the U.S. justice system. If you are still baffled by the O.J. Simpson trial result, you *need* to pay attention to this. Prosecutors and the police are, on the whole, well motivated human beings, but given: tremendous pressures on them to get prosecutions + folks to whom they are accountable (the well-off, the majority) + folks over whom they have nearly absolute power (those on the margins for whatever reason). This can and does yield deeply entrenched injustice.
Leaving out whatever details there may be that lead to her charge and conviction doesn't bode well for Bukowski. It all kind of sounds like sour grapes to me. Why should a government agency be involved in investigating what, from her own account here, seems to be little more than her own shortcomings professionally and some ill-conceived personal vendetta?
Diane bukowski is the "Joke of the Motor City" . The jury found her guilty because she did it. Bukowski is a babling iddiotte! VoD (Voice of Detroit) is Filled with lies and hatred for the community of Wayne County. Like FrankeeFraud says < Aww,Shut the FUCK up, You Ugly Polack Bitch!
Detroitcitysuperwoma 1 week ago
Aw, shut the fuck up, you ugly Polack bitch!
FrankeeFraud 2 years ago
Funny, a JURY convicted her. Not the prosecutor's office, not the police, but the common citizens of Wayne Co. Her outbursts lack incredibility, and her main intend is to stir hatred amongst us.
BlueCapedGirl 2 years ago
Blue, juries only decide on what the prosecution and judge allows them to see. Doesn't it bother you (or did you know) that the fact that the police destroyed evidence (her pictures) and that the prosecution didn't include any evidence at all? If she stepped in blood, why didn't they bring in her shoes? The cops said there were so many people that they were in danger pulling cops off of crownd control, so how come there were no other witnesses to back up what the cops alleged?
KellyLogan 2 years ago
I've heard many stories from people I trust of much worse behavior when I wasn't around. I don't know anyone personally who is in prison -- guilty or innocent -- so if that's your measure, you'll win your argument every time. That's the whole point -- if enough people understood or had an interest in these cases, they would be stopped. It's a system that develops between institutions --shedding light tends to clean it up. What hope is there of that when folks like yourself "shoot the messenger"?
tallisonii 2 years ago
Dude, you're losing it. Have you not been paying attention to the news with respect to DNA evidence clearing people who were on death row? If people are sitting on death row who are beyond a doubt innocent, how hard is it to buy that the same is true for lesser offenses? I personally have only ever witnessed harassing behavior that I wouldn't have believed from the police when in public with people who weren't white, male protestants.
tallisonii 2 years ago
By the way, when I mention the OJ trial, I'm not commenting on the validity or lack thereof of the outcome. I'm talking about how shocking it was for me and folks like me -- and I think what this woman is saying goes to shedding some light on an aspect of our society that most of us live in ignorant bliss of. If you knew of literally 100s of cases where innocent people were sent to jail and had their lives ruined, you could maybe start to see that trial through the eyes of many of the jurors.
tallisonii 2 years ago
You're saying that because American black people may have suffered injustices in the past that, on any given occasion, a jury has the right to correct those injustices by overlooking the specifics of the individual case before their purview. Your argument is that sympathy is an excuse for injustice.
hankfletcher 2 years ago
Nope, I'm saying that watching people you know are innocent get railroaded into long prison terms by a colluding police and judicial system can make you MUCH more skeptical about what representatives from those two institutions tell you in a court of law. I'm saying that those of us on the "inside" who think the our officers don't behave this way have a hard time fathoming why anyone might doubt their word. I'm saying that what she's describing is less rare than you imagine.
tallisonii 2 years ago
Who did you know was innocent, how did you know they were innocent, and what did you do to present evidence of their innocence?
Or, in actuality, did you know nothing at all, and begin constructing your own reality based on what suited your interests?
hankfletcher 2 years ago
This is the dark underbelly of the U.S. justice system. If you are still baffled by the O.J. Simpson trial result, you *need* to pay attention to this. Prosecutors and the police are, on the whole, well motivated human beings, but given: tremendous pressures on them to get prosecutions + folks to whom they are accountable (the well-off, the majority) + folks over whom they have nearly absolute power (those on the margins for whatever reason). This can and does yield deeply entrenched injustice.
tallisonii 2 years ago
Leaving out whatever details there may be that lead to her charge and conviction doesn't bode well for Bukowski. It all kind of sounds like sour grapes to me. Why should a government agency be involved in investigating what, from her own account here, seems to be little more than her own shortcomings professionally and some ill-conceived personal vendetta?
hankfletcher 2 years ago