Further Conversations With Dr. Jack Sarfatti -- 3/18/09 -- Pt1

[DrFruedienslip]

Vocabulary has everything to do within explaining anything true' are we attempting to define reality? How can anyone follow anyone elses spiel unless they have a firm preceptual connection within how anything becomes pertinent' any true physical intelligence which can and does exists should have a very consice exemplification, one cannot teach another anything which cannot be construaled within anyones own mind set.

[LendMeYourHand]

I like standard quantum particle theories. When they start going gravity & string theory, they fuck it all up. Its funny how the ancients keep ending up right about it all. The freemasonic secret is free energy. The EM field is direct proof that gravity does not exist. By switching vortexes spoken of in modern physics clockwise/counter. Now the old model that outlined polarity attributes was finally buried. Quantum theorists should have no problem throwing the gravity model out of the equation.

[DrFruedienslip]

@LendMeYourHand Most but not all dont take enough time in thinking through anything these days,

[LendMeYourHand]

@DrFruedienslip What ideas do you have about quantum merging with physics? I have been deeply interested in Neutrino particles on a biochemistry standpoint & brainwave frequencies. Thats been my kick lately, as a lot of new theories are surfacing on this phenomenon. Just interested to hear your views.

[DrFruedienslip]

@LendMeYourHand I guess the question is what are we looking at first to accomplish when it comes to any science within any regards within exemplification. What does quantum merging actually represent within any hypothetical sense? Any sense for any constual takes what can be known while at the same time asking any question of any goal. Is the question a matter within expanding any sense for consciousness? I'll give you an example in this next paragraph regarding any concept to gravity.

[DrFruedienslip]

@DrFruedienslip Gravity has more to do with any bouyancy factor and barametric pressure, which Newton did not exemplfy, so his ideals are only theoritical rather than anything being exemplified within any metaphysical dialog. Construal is within the mind not brain wave functions as the mind is separate whereas persons are often fixated upon the brain rather than any potential of the minds unlimited capabilities. I dont know where Im going with this yet give me some feed back

[apacheramsey]

hey, energy has to have an opposing particle.

[ehswan]

There is no "dark matter" only dark energy. Dark energy pushed non gravitationally bound entities apart, BUT presses in upon gravitationally entities. Hence our the galaxy does not fly apart. As the dark energy of the vacuum presses in upon it while pressing non gravitationally bounded entities apart. Hence the accelerating expansion of the universe.

[JackSarfatti]

I made a slip of the tongue. At present time, dark energy to dark matter ratio is approximately 3 to 1 not 2 to 1.

[TheBigCollapse]

So the dark matter halo would have to be in a disk or spherical shape, according to the shape of the galaxy, allowing for perturbation shapes of galaxies in collision, right?

[AlienScientist]

Thank you Dr. Jack Sarfatti!

Disclosure is coming soon!

[lensman137]

Yes, it is -- one way or the other.

[ronblue2]

Jack is giving us a real possibility of achieving our Stargate and Star Trek dream during our life time. Do not dismiss what he is saying listen and learn. Ron Blue