Bower 650-1300mm f/8-16- Review- Part 2. [HD]

[otografie]

Top notch bad review! Not one picture taken!

[dudedude8998]

Nice imovie

[chargerfun34]

@dudedude8998 What's wrong with iMovie.

[doran22]

why the hell would you put music in a video like this?

[mwethereld]

lol 3:41 "When I Shoot Alot!.... umm,,, I Shoot Alot!"

[chargerfun34]

@mwethereld You pretty much got that wrong, but it's okay. Haha the concept's there lol

[thehamza1296]

at the beginning of the video i got scared because i thought your was your pubic hair LOL

[noobie1890]

How much were the lens? I saw the same ones on Ebay for about $397. If that's their usual price then I'll just go to my local camera store

[noobie1890]

@mongosebmx It comes in a bag but that's pretty big too!

[picturepunk]

Dude, you reviewed the eye cup.

(tip- you dont have to narrate everything you do, just ramble about the image quality of the lens for a bit and there! You actually have a review.

And yes, a review does follow prerequisites for such terminology to apply. Okay now, byebye then

[SH1R3PRODUCT1ONS]

Think you have enough camera for that lens buddy? lol

[chargerfun34]

@mongosebmx A really, really big one.

[handsomelok]

one thing I really want to say is that you are doing a product review, and PRODUCTS REVIEW or how to shoot. you spend too much time talking about staff and not actually reviewing the lens, keep it simple

[chargerfun34]

@handsomelok Here's the problem I have with that. There's no set guidelines for "reviewing". That means, I can "review" a product however I so feel fits it best. It's not your judgement to decide if this was a good review or not. It's mine. I put the effort into, it is your job to watch the video (if so feels like it) and grab enough information as I'm putting out. No matter what the content is.

[doran22]

@chargerfun34 but if you want views and subscribers, you have to listen to your community.

then maybe you can get more than 10000 views in a year, and a better like/dislike ratio

[aidaja]

@chargerfun34 It's called constructive criticism. His comment isn't malicious in anyway, in fact his comments only intention is for you to progress, and improve. And so I am happy that you are content, and confident with your reviewing ability, but that's not to say you could improve, just as I could improve at many things I do. So rather then perceiving this negatively just say "thanks, I'll keep that in mind"

[BeExperienced]

Fuck that lens bends on that tri-pod... Not good....

[jooptothebeat]

can you send me a link with photos taken with this lens?

im still waiting on mine *sigh*

[omani1233]

please would you record a video and show us how far this lens can bring >> foucs on far object .

please please

[borozonx]

hi !! what about the quality of the pictures..and do you have pics on flickr...

[borozonx]

hi !! what about the quality of the pictures..

[jormis95]

that lens sucks

[Rezaroth]

wish to see some sample pics with the lens. and nikon d300 has a 95% viewfinder coverage and not 100%

great vid, I love it :)

thank you for the effort

[chargerfun34]

@Rezaroth I have some on Flickr. Would you like the link? And no, its 100%.

Thanks! I really appreciate it.

[GeorgeMaj15]

@chargerfun34 flickr link would be great!

[Pinnger]

useless video

[conory]

LOL at the nikon stickers.

[djkrissN]

where did you buy this lens ?

or do you know where i can find this cheap ?

[chargerfun34]

I have a question? Why does this video and Part 1 have such low ratings? Is this that bad of a series? I mean their both 1-Star??:(

[MosesChew777]

@chargerfun34

Hey Chargerfun34, you've got great vids on the specs and all...the only problem is...you need to include PHOTO SAMPLES from that lens!!!

People want to see the real, untempered results of that beast...and also what its like on Live View, as someone b4 me mentioned....so that they can make a decision to buy this guy or not.

That's the reason why your rating is so low.

[stubones]

@chargerfun34 It could be because its an absolutely awful lens... Nikon and Canon charge huge amounts of money for their supertele's because they have optimal lens (including glass) technology, VR or IS and AF (all the newer ones). If you're after a "cheaper than than a Nikon tele" then you're better off looking for a used nikon mount Tamron or Sigma. You mount a crap lens on an average to good body and you get crap IQ, you mount a decent lens on a decent body and you get good IQ......

[robinhood2167]

How's the quality?

[karthiksrichandra]

live view not shown. i hate it.show me the live view

[moosa1988]

whats the name of the track playing in the background

[canonsucks]

@moosa1988 Alone With You (Original Mix) by Deadmau5 (dead mouse)