He lost me when he said one or two or three hoaxer's. On youtube alone, there are thousands. How can you blame the media for not wanting to look silly again and again. Some good points, but that one does not hold water. Of all the evidence I have seen, I could rationally explain 99% of it as known misidentification. The other 1% keeps me hooked.
There are rumors that there is a human living in the house across the street from me. I've seen some tantalizing bits of anecdotal evidence and heard stories about him from some of the locals who claim to have had sightings, but as of yet, I have never actually seen him. I've certainly never seen any good photos or videos of him. Therefore, I must trust my skepticism and deny his very existence.
Highly informative and to the point. His interview is based on real world knowledge. He makes it plain and simple that this creature is not supernatural but flesh and blood.
I like hearing from Bindernagel and Meldrum because I feel like they're smart, genuinely curious and have no ego trips or big-game hunter wanting to bag a bigfoot attitudes. Hey, I admit, I live in the freaking desert and I hike a lot and have been doing so for 33 years here and never seen a javelina, but I know they exist. It's possible if I lived in the NW, I could hike in the woods for 33 years and never encounter a BF. I like his very open-minded interest.
Glad to see your posting again. I really liked these! A solid half an hour with Bindernagal relatively unedited is great! Your efforts are starting to grow on me. Although my habituation and general interest is for personal exploration and experience, i feel as if i should be sharing more myself like you so often do! Im working on some ideas for finger printing. Thanks for posting!
I wonder why the guy that shot and killed one didnt try to bring it out of the forest? I can understand him maybe not wanting to talk about it to people for fear of being labeled crazy or something. But to have an actual body of one and not try to get it out doesnt seem right to me for some reason. And the size of it wouldnt matter because he was hunting moose. They are a huge animal also. So I think if he could get a moose out the forest then I think he could have gotten the bf out too.
@clewi1091 Because it was during WWII and the guy was German, he did not want to draw attention to himself. I did ask john that question after the interview.
Chest beating? I don't think so, sorry. That is a biased remark because you assume it's an ape. It's a human type, that's why it does 'tree knocking' something you should have known as a researcher which has been repeatedly reported as one of it's behaviors. Sigh, until people drop their biases, there will be no science. THEY ARE NOT GORILLAS OR APES. That is your first bias (mistake).
@c1zx the important thing about John is he is addressing the issue regarding "acceptance of the evidence" which does constitute discovery. We are all on the same team at this point though yes I agree there are biases and different view points. Let's split hairs after discovery has been acknowledged.
@trailriderresearch I agree with accepting evidence. I disagree with comments that lack evidence (chest beating) and is a stereotype from preconceived notions about apes and how they behave. It would be better to examine the evidence, and not decide beforehand what you expect to see in behavior based on prejudice of what you already think big foot is. I'm not on the same page with any scientist who makes false statements. Might as well just read a good fiction.
@c1zx you don't know that for sure. Is it a primitive man? The missing link? A bi-pedal ape-like primate? WTH knows...until someone has a real photo that isn't a hoax of a blurry blob, or until someone produces an actual body...no one will be able to definitively prove this creature's existance must less it's exact placement in the animal kingdom. Heck, I'm still waiting for Melba Ketchum to produce results from the Erickson Project.
He lost me when he said one or two or three hoaxer's. On youtube alone, there are thousands. How can you blame the media for not wanting to look silly again and again. Some good points, but that one does not hold water. Of all the evidence I have seen, I could rationally explain 99% of it as known misidentification. The other 1% keeps me hooked.
craig79792000 1 month ago
The one I saw was right IN town, but near a greenway with hugh powerlines and train tracks.
rarebasses 2 months ago
There are rumors that there is a human living in the house across the street from me. I've seen some tantalizing bits of anecdotal evidence and heard stories about him from some of the locals who claim to have had sightings, but as of yet, I have never actually seen him. I've certainly never seen any good photos or videos of him. Therefore, I must trust my skepticism and deny his very existence.
rmcdaniel423 3 months ago
his last name is a real hinderance, for any serious discussion...
onceANexile 3 months ago
Highly informative and to the point. His interview is based on real world knowledge. He makes it plain and simple that this creature is not supernatural but flesh and blood.
flycatchful 4 months ago
That was really interesting
OldJong 4 months ago
great post. thanks.
cunnidvd 7 months ago
I like hearing from Bindernagel and Meldrum because I feel like they're smart, genuinely curious and have no ego trips or big-game hunter wanting to bag a bigfoot attitudes. Hey, I admit, I live in the freaking desert and I hike a lot and have been doing so for 33 years here and never seen a javelina, but I know they exist. It's possible if I lived in the NW, I could hike in the woods for 33 years and never encounter a BF. I like his very open-minded interest.
psychic62 1 year ago
Glad to see your posting again. I really liked these! A solid half an hour with Bindernagal relatively unedited is great! Your efforts are starting to grow on me. Although my habituation and general interest is for personal exploration and experience, i feel as if i should be sharing more myself like you so often do! Im working on some ideas for finger printing. Thanks for posting!
Ehdubs 1 year ago
Nice to hear a man of Science expounding his belief in the Sasquatch, pity there aren,t more of his ilk, apart from Dr Meldrum et al !
brogs60 1 year ago
I wonder why the guy that shot and killed one didnt try to bring it out of the forest? I can understand him maybe not wanting to talk about it to people for fear of being labeled crazy or something. But to have an actual body of one and not try to get it out doesnt seem right to me for some reason. And the size of it wouldnt matter because he was hunting moose. They are a huge animal also. So I think if he could get a moose out the forest then I think he could have gotten the bf out too.
clewi1091 1 year ago
@clewi1091 Because it was during WWII and the guy was German, he did not want to draw attention to himself. I did ask john that question after the interview.
trailriderresearch 1 year ago
Chest beating? I don't think so, sorry. That is a biased remark because you assume it's an ape. It's a human type, that's why it does 'tree knocking' something you should have known as a researcher which has been repeatedly reported as one of it's behaviors. Sigh, until people drop their biases, there will be no science. THEY ARE NOT GORILLAS OR APES. That is your first bias (mistake).
c1zx 1 year ago
@c1zx the important thing about John is he is addressing the issue regarding "acceptance of the evidence" which does constitute discovery. We are all on the same team at this point though yes I agree there are biases and different view points. Let's split hairs after discovery has been acknowledged.
trailriderresearch 1 year ago
@trailriderresearch I agree with accepting evidence. I disagree with comments that lack evidence (chest beating) and is a stereotype from preconceived notions about apes and how they behave. It would be better to examine the evidence, and not decide beforehand what you expect to see in behavior based on prejudice of what you already think big foot is. I'm not on the same page with any scientist who makes false statements. Might as well just read a good fiction.
c1zx 1 year ago
@c1zx How would you classify them if not ape?
cunnidvd 7 months ago
@c1zx do you know what an ape is?
cunnidvd 6 months ago
@c1zx you don't know that for sure. Is it a primitive man? The missing link? A bi-pedal ape-like primate? WTH knows...until someone has a real photo that isn't a hoax of a blurry blob, or until someone produces an actual body...no one will be able to definitively prove this creature's existance must less it's exact placement in the animal kingdom. Heck, I'm still waiting for Melba Ketchum to produce results from the Erickson Project.
CityWideCharlotte 4 months ago
Very Nice! It was a refreshing break on my eyes too. I've been analyzing a lot of videos lately.
cryptozoology 1 year ago
Comment removed
cryptozoology 1 year ago
Comment removed
cryptozoology 1 year ago
Thanks for sharing. This is a wonderful interview. I am looking forward to reading Dr. Bindernagel's new book.
tagrr 1 year ago
thanks so much for posting this video. It's very good
MrRafter08 1 year ago