I might be nitpicking, but I have to point out that the Juno 6 was not programmable, at least it did not have a patch memory to store sounds, that feature was introduced in its successor the Juno 60. But the Juno 6 was a great machine nevertheless. I have one of those babies in my studio and it is the puchiest polysynth I have ever heard.
@dudewhosaysarrh The Juno 6 was totally programmable. That's all it was. Just because it had no presets doesn't mean it wasn't programmable. That's like saying that modular synths are not programmable since they don't have presets. Anyway I have a 106 and would love to add a 6 or 60 to my studio because I agree that they sound more "punchy" than the 106.
@JimBobJrJackson I guess there was a misunderstanding concerning my use of the word "programmable" If you mean that it was possible to create a sound by tweaking the parameters, then yes, in that sense it is programmable. What I meant by "programmable" was "building a sound and storing it in a soundbank so that it can be recalled later" and that was oviously also Rolands definition because the word "programmable" is used on the control panel of the Juno 60 but not on the Juno 6
I have a question for any experienced keyboardist. I am starting a band with a style similar to Nine inch nails/ foster the people/ grouplove. I have no Idea when it comes to synths. Would this be something to consider taking in to effect price?
i want to buy the kbord..ive read the manual..the manual did not specify if you can use the split, layer and superlayer simultaneously..please answer me..thnks
@dnichols24 there is the E-09. it has almost the same voices as the juno di. but no knobs for editing patches and its a pretty old model (i think it was released in 2006)
So versatile, so light to carry around -- if ur a working musician. I like that Roland retained a lot of the great patch sounds and control buttons from the JV and XP models, altho some people say that the sound engine is identical to a Fantom. They keep touting this board as "entry level" but I can tell u as an experienced keyboardist whose played for nearly 40 years. This instrument, for it's price, is one of the most inspiring keyboards u will ever play. The patches alone are worth the price
PLEASE ! Help me ! I'm looking for a new synth, i already have a wk-210 but it's not a real synth ! So should i have to buy he Di or The GI ? I know the Gi is better but i don't want to spend a lot of money :s § So Is the Di can make trance leads, bass ? Dubstep ? Jean michel jarre like sounds ?
Hi Sonicstate, I feel almost dumb for asking this , but can the Juno do sounds as heared in 80's new wave/post punk tracks... Cure, Joy Division, Sisters of Mercy, etc... Type sounds? Thanks in advance.
I play in a club band and while we're not strictly and 80's band we do play a bunch of stuff from the 80s...Duran Duran, Howard Jones, Thompson Twins, Cars, Steve Winwood Modern English, Yaz, Madonna, Lover Boy, Psy-Furs, Don Henley, Motels, Michael Jackson, Peter Gabriel, Bon Jovi, Blondie, etc... and I can confidently say, with over 350 great synth patches alone, there's something closely resembling just about every type of syth sound that was popular in the 80s, "twin saws" patch is amazing!
Would anyone say this is a good synth for trance music, i mean i like trance music but i made the mistake of going out and getting a JP-8000 for trance and it didn't come with any piano sounds. I would just like a synth that is good with electro music and also does piano along side. If anyone knows a keyboard like it or has this one id really appreciate the help before spending money on something i won't appreciate.
I'm not a musician (okay, I dabble a little with drums) but my 7 year old son who is learning piano and has been doing so for nearly 2 years now really wants me to get him a synth.
He current has a full size key digital piano and I'm concerned that if I get him a synth with smaller keys, he'll struggle with playing a real piano due to differing key sizes.
Please can you give some advice on that because otherwise this seems like a good starter ???
Hi. Love your videos. I have just bought a Korg R3, and had it for a few months. However, iv just stumbled upon the Juno Di, and i am starting to think i would have been better off with that instead. What are your thoughts? the R3 only seems to have 128 presets onboard. I am a novice and wanted an entry level synth to play some vintage poly sounds etc. Would the Di be more suitable? the r3 doesnt have piano sounds or drum pads which is a let down.
I messed with this in the music store, and the achilles heel of it seemed to be the bass sounds, which seemed thin, but then again, I didn't use the layer, superlayer feature which would probably beef it up considerably.
This is basically a casio with USB and other amenities. I used to hate this casio I had because the sounds were so cheap, but now I can appreciate it. Good fun to be had on a good preset machine. This isn't really a synth though IMO.
does the di i have LFO? i know the roland juno d does. but im not sure if im missing something or if its just not there. and what about the d beam? does it have settings for it, like volume, or ressance, crap like that? thanks
does the di i have LFO? i know the roland juno d does. but im not sure if im missing something or if its just not there. and what about the d beam? does it have settings for it, like volume, or ressance, crap like that? thanks
Привет из италии!!!!!! Мне очень понравилось видео! А Roland juno-Di ещё больше!!!!!!! Мне приятно видеть такой инструмент!!!!!!!!! Вы делаете хорошее дело когда снимаете такое видео и такой тестдрайв!!!!!!!!!!! A me stato piacere guardare questo video! Io voglio komprare subito questo instrument!!!!!!!! Sei GRANDE!!!!!!!!!!!!! Ciao!!!!!!
The Di actually is a synth. It's just set up different. It's more than a built in filter. The onboard patch modify options aren't as detailed as other synths (including the older Juno-D/Le).., but when you use the software editor the Juno-Di is every bit of a synth.... The software unlocks the synth engine.
You guys gotta look at it differently. When the old Juno's were on the shelves they were an affordable alternative to what was being used "IN THOSE DAYS". Much has changed in how keyboards produce sound today. The current Juno does EXACTLY what it did years ago. It provides a very cost effective unit based on where we are TODAY. It's pointless IMO to compare these modern Juno's to yester-year because VA and Modeling Synths are what you buy TODAY for retro sounds (or a real analogue unit).
Darn, I accidentally hit remove for the last comment - no are you sure? stage..
Sorry about that, it was saying that the Di didnt deserve the Juno tag - I would mention that the Juno range was always about affordable Roland technology rather than special analog- ness.
agree. imo all those post-2000 junos doesn't deserve to have a JUNO name on the panel. i ain't say it's a bad gear. it might be good for many. but it still have nothing to do with a juno series (except some of desing).
I know it's no Juno of the past.., but these modern Juno's are exactly what the Juno's from yester-year were. They're a cost effective unit based on today's standards. These modern Juno's are simply just "A sign of the times".
the juno's are somewhat iconic. To some it's easy to be offended by taking what is a well percieved iconic sound and character and tying it the new once rather unrelated in character and sound is a bit insulting. i'm nowhere near that i just believe it's a bit of a misnomer.
I can understand that.. but the way I look at it is that this is 2009 (almost 2010). Personally I can't understand the anger in some that a Juno in 2009 doesn't sound like a Juno from the 80's. There are other options out there to get that type of sound (affordable one's too). Roland just "updated" the Juno series. The new line's purpose is exactly what it was in the early to mid 80's. It's a cost effective unit based on "current" technology. I used to own several of the old Juno's too :)
This is very impressive. I was all set to get the Blofeld because it's neat as heck. That's now going to have to wait because I think I need a Juno Di first. It looks like an all around low cost board for some composition, especially if you haven't touched an instrument in years.
Actually one of the topics covered for the Juno-Di upon the initial release info was that (one) of its purposes is to provide a good synth for people who have played in the past, and are getting back into it :)
I sent a vid response to them to show what the Vocoder can do (audio only demo). I tweeked a patch (took all of 3 minutes) and even used a cheapo mic. It turned out fairly well too. The Di's Vocoder is actually pretty darn good. If you have a good quality mic the sound quality will be much better. Plus using the preset Vocoder patches won't get you far. You can use ANY of the presets as your source for the Vocoder. It's easy to make a user patch for the Vocoder too.
This synth is AMAZING! Great sounding presets.., looks great, and is built better than the previous Juno-D/Le. It sounds 1000 times bettter too. The software editor is awesome. The Juno-Di's patch mode is really a 4 osc structure (just like the Juno-G and Stage models). The software editor bumps the Di's patch editing up to a pro level.., the editing options are UNREAL. I've had mine for several weeks and LOVE IT. The Vocoder is much more capable than shown in this vid too.
Have you played one? If you have.., did you play it through a decent set of monitors? The pianos are not bad at all. the Concert Grand is amazing. For the price and how many sounds were compessed within the 64mb's of ROM the pianos are really quite good. The key is to adjust the velocity settings to your playing style.
I might be nitpicking, but I have to point out that the Juno 6 was not programmable, at least it did not have a patch memory to store sounds, that feature was introduced in its successor the Juno 60. But the Juno 6 was a great machine nevertheless. I have one of those babies in my studio and it is the puchiest polysynth I have ever heard.
dudewhosaysarrh 2 weeks ago
@dudewhosaysarrh The Juno 6 was totally programmable. That's all it was. Just because it had no presets doesn't mean it wasn't programmable. That's like saying that modular synths are not programmable since they don't have presets. Anyway I have a 106 and would love to add a 6 or 60 to my studio because I agree that they sound more "punchy" than the 106.
JimBobJrJackson 1 week ago
@JimBobJrJackson I guess there was a misunderstanding concerning my use of the word "programmable" If you mean that it was possible to create a sound by tweaking the parameters, then yes, in that sense it is programmable. What I meant by "programmable" was "building a sound and storing it in a soundbank so that it can be recalled later" and that was oviously also Rolands definition because the word "programmable" is used on the control panel of the Juno 60 but not on the Juno 6
dudewhosaysarrh 1 week ago
I have a question for any experienced keyboardist. I am starting a band with a style similar to Nine inch nails/ foster the people/ grouplove. I have no Idea when it comes to synths. Would this be something to consider taking in to effect price?
Vamp10988 2 months ago
i want to buy the kbord..ive read the manual..the manual did not specify if you can use the split, layer and superlayer simultaneously..please answer me..thnks
lampitoklive 3 months ago
For £750 I want some knobs. What's the fun in editing hardware synth on the pc. The reason you buy hardware is 'cause of its tactile nature.
coolshit28 3 months ago
flawless synth ! its very hard nowadays to find amazing affordable keyboards, this and the microkorg and also the micro X, break that boundary
francaisemusique 3 months ago
I can't edit the patches on the software. I plued this into the m aduio fastrack pro. Help
numanuma20 3 months ago
AWESOME!!! is there a cheaper version of this? like $300
dnichols24 4 months ago
@dnichols24 there is the E-09. it has almost the same voices as the juno di. but no knobs for editing patches and its a pretty old model (i think it was released in 2006)
MrPlaystationboy 1 week ago
So versatile, so light to carry around -- if ur a working musician. I like that Roland retained a lot of the great patch sounds and control buttons from the JV and XP models, altho some people say that the sound engine is identical to a Fantom. They keep touting this board as "entry level" but I can tell u as an experienced keyboardist whose played for nearly 40 years. This instrument, for it's price, is one of the most inspiring keyboards u will ever play. The patches alone are worth the price
wildnites558 4 months ago
My sister says she wants to play with his bottom.
eggbertsmith 5 months ago
PLEASE ! Help me ! I'm looking for a new synth, i already have a wk-210 but it's not a real synth ! So should i have to buy he Di or The GI ? I know the Gi is better but i don't want to spend a lot of money :s § So Is the Di can make trance leads, bass ? Dubstep ? Jean michel jarre like sounds ?
aazrtdfg 5 months ago
Hi Sonicstate, I feel almost dumb for asking this , but can the Juno do sounds as heared in 80's new wave/post punk tracks... Cure, Joy Division, Sisters of Mercy, etc... Type sounds? Thanks in advance.
Littleloner 6 months ago
I play in a club band and while we're not strictly and 80's band we do play a bunch of stuff from the 80s...Duran Duran, Howard Jones, Thompson Twins, Cars, Steve Winwood Modern English, Yaz, Madonna, Lover Boy, Psy-Furs, Don Henley, Motels, Michael Jackson, Peter Gabriel, Bon Jovi, Blondie, etc... and I can confidently say, with over 350 great synth patches alone, there's something closely resembling just about every type of syth sound that was popular in the 80s, "twin saws" patch is amazing!
wildnites558 4 months ago
i want to see this guy sing poker face covered in grease with a colinder on his head
ThePoorhillbilly 7 months ago
Is it better than the microkorg xl? Ive been looking for something to replace it and saw this on craigslist
METALHEAD4556 8 months ago
Its great starter keyboard. but somehow i still prefer the Juno 60
haikousei 10 months ago
Do I need an electronic amplifier for this Synthie?
FreakyMeDown 11 months ago
Would anyone say this is a good synth for trance music, i mean i like trance music but i made the mistake of going out and getting a JP-8000 for trance and it didn't come with any piano sounds. I would just like a synth that is good with electro music and also does piano along side. If anyone knows a keyboard like it or has this one id really appreciate the help before spending money on something i won't appreciate.
Thankyou.
TechnoTranceRM 11 months ago
dose any one know If I can use juno Di as audio interface as well like juno Gi?
webncyber 1 year ago
Wait...so you can't plug it in? Is that true? If that's the case, they just lost a buyer.
CriticsConfession 1 year ago
can ny one help me select between yamaha mm6 and mm6???
plzz a reply wud b appreciated...
9322002898 1 year ago
I would like to see a vid just about the synth patches
GHstLyHanDZ 1 year ago
the acoustic guitar settings on this thing are so realistic, and so boss.
AdrienChaos 1 year ago
I loved your review, thanks.
I'm not a musician (okay, I dabble a little with drums) but my 7 year old son who is learning piano and has been doing so for nearly 2 years now really wants me to get him a synth.
He current has a full size key digital piano and I'm concerned that if I get him a synth with smaller keys, he'll struggle with playing a real piano due to differing key sizes.
Please can you give some advice on that because otherwise this seems like a good starter ???
Thanks.
Jez
Jez2008UK 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
excellent reviewer
hermano1383 1 year ago
Hi. Love your videos. I have just bought a Korg R3, and had it for a few months. However, iv just stumbled upon the Juno Di, and i am starting to think i would have been better off with that instead. What are your thoughts? the R3 only seems to have 128 presets onboard. I am a novice and wanted an entry level synth to play some vintage poly sounds etc. Would the Di be more suitable? the r3 doesnt have piano sounds or drum pads which is a let down.
purplemf 1 year ago
I messed with this in the music store, and the achilles heel of it seemed to be the bass sounds, which seemed thin, but then again, I didn't use the layer, superlayer feature which would probably beef it up considerably.
djilyaz 1 year ago
hi can tell me does this juno di only work on rechargeable batteries ? can it be plugged into mains socket ?
DOOMSDAY2078 1 year ago
I just ordered mine today, I'm so excited ^_^
AstraVex 1 year ago
Cool
Thewordsr4u 1 year ago
Does anyone know if the Juno Di will recognize the aftertouch from another midi keyboard?
Thanks
TheBigGuppy 1 year ago
This is basically a casio with USB and other amenities. I used to hate this casio I had because the sounds were so cheap, but now I can appreciate it. Good fun to be had on a good preset machine. This isn't really a synth though IMO.
sheatheman 1 year ago
hi! great review it helped me a lot, i´m deciding if i get this model or a casio privia as my 1st piano..
i just wanted to ask you.. do you know if this model works with any of the following softwares? Cubase, Fruity Loops, Protools, Reaktor, Abbleton..
thanks! :)
luzdbv 1 year ago
The difference between this and a real Juno is that in 30 yrs time this will be long forgotten.
maccagrabme 1 year ago
@maccagrabme
AMEN to that! This thing has nothing to do with the juno series at all.
It's not even a synth, it's a ROMpler!!
SPAZZOID100 1 year ago
does the di i have LFO? i know the roland juno d does. but im not sure if im missing something or if its just not there. and what about the d beam? does it have settings for it, like volume, or ressance, crap like that? thanks
yousuckcorp 2 years ago
does the di i have LFO? i know the roland juno d does. but im not sure if im missing something or if its just not there. and what about the d beam? does it have settings for it, like volume, or ressance, crap like that? thanks
yousuckcorp 2 years ago
can the superlayer be split/layer by range and velocity?
zzzxtreme 2 years ago
good price value keyboard , excellent reviewer
tiotomtom 2 years ago 16
yeah, i like the sahara string patch too :)
sturmtigerDMW 2 years ago
Привет из италии!!!!!! Мне очень понравилось видео! А Roland juno-Di ещё больше!!!!!!! Мне приятно видеть такой инструмент!!!!!!!!! Вы делаете хорошее дело когда снимаете такое видео и такой тестдрайв!!!!!!!!!!! A me stato piacere guardare questo video! Io voglio komprare subito questo instrument!!!!!!!! Sei GRANDE!!!!!!!!!!!!! Ciao!!!!!!
GryshkovVil 2 years ago
this is not a juno nor even a synth!
It's a ROMpler with a built in filter......
MARANTZamp 2 years ago
The Di actually is a synth. It's just set up different. It's more than a built in filter. The onboard patch modify options aren't as detailed as other synths (including the older Juno-D/Le).., but when you use the software editor the Juno-Di is every bit of a synth.... The software unlocks the synth engine.
squeakD 2 years ago
oh it's a synth. look at the editor software.
tekkentool 2 years ago
excellent overview.. thanks!
iamwong 2 years ago
You guys gotta look at it differently. When the old Juno's were on the shelves they were an affordable alternative to what was being used "IN THOSE DAYS". Much has changed in how keyboards produce sound today. The current Juno does EXACTLY what it did years ago. It provides a very cost effective unit based on where we are TODAY. It's pointless IMO to compare these modern Juno's to yester-year because VA and Modeling Synths are what you buy TODAY for retro sounds (or a real analogue unit).
squeakD 2 years ago
Darn, I accidentally hit remove for the last comment - no are you sure? stage..
Sorry about that, it was saying that the Di didnt deserve the Juno tag - I would mention that the Juno range was always about affordable Roland technology rather than special analog- ness.
Anyhow, sorry about the delete
sonicstate 2 years ago
this ain't no juno.....it's not even a synth like the old ones were
MARANTZamp 2 years ago
agree. imo all those post-2000 junos doesn't deserve to have a JUNO name on the panel. i ain't say it's a bad gear. it might be good for many. but it still have nothing to do with a juno series (except some of desing).
michal23pl 2 years ago
sorry squeak i'm agreeing wth this guy, great synth. just not juno.
tekkentool 2 years ago
I know it's no Juno of the past.., but these modern Juno's are exactly what the Juno's from yester-year were. They're a cost effective unit based on today's standards. These modern Juno's are simply just "A sign of the times".
squeakD 2 years ago
the juno's are somewhat iconic. To some it's easy to be offended by taking what is a well percieved iconic sound and character and tying it the new once rather unrelated in character and sound is a bit insulting. i'm nowhere near that i just believe it's a bit of a misnomer.
tekkentool 2 years ago
I can understand that.. but the way I look at it is that this is 2009 (almost 2010). Personally I can't understand the anger in some that a Juno in 2009 doesn't sound like a Juno from the 80's. There are other options out there to get that type of sound (affordable one's too). Roland just "updated" the Juno series. The new line's purpose is exactly what it was in the early to mid 80's. It's a cost effective unit based on "current" technology. I used to own several of the old Juno's too :)
squeakD 2 years ago
This is very impressive. I was all set to get the Blofeld because it's neat as heck. That's now going to have to wait because I think I need a Juno Di first. It looks like an all around low cost board for some composition, especially if you haven't touched an instrument in years.
Consolefan 2 years ago
Actually one of the topics covered for the Juno-Di upon the initial release info was that (one) of its purposes is to provide a good synth for people who have played in the past, and are getting back into it :)
squeakD 2 years ago
I sent a vid response to them to show what the Vocoder can do (audio only demo). I tweeked a patch (took all of 3 minutes) and even used a cheapo mic. It turned out fairly well too. The Di's Vocoder is actually pretty darn good. If you have a good quality mic the sound quality will be much better. Plus using the preset Vocoder patches won't get you far. You can use ANY of the presets as your source for the Vocoder. It's easy to make a user patch for the Vocoder too.
squeakD 2 years ago
haha, the vocoder sounds really great in this video.
filmakerjamiefilmz 2 years ago
This synth is AMAZING! Great sounding presets.., looks great, and is built better than the previous Juno-D/Le. It sounds 1000 times bettter too. The software editor is awesome. The Juno-Di's patch mode is really a 4 osc structure (just like the Juno-G and Stage models). The software editor bumps the Di's patch editing up to a pro level.., the editing options are UNREAL. I've had mine for several weeks and LOVE IT. The Vocoder is much more capable than shown in this vid too.
squeakD 2 years ago 7
it has a bad piano sound.
idleminds1 2 years ago
Have you played one? If you have.., did you play it through a decent set of monitors? The pianos are not bad at all. the Concert Grand is amazing. For the price and how many sounds were compessed within the 64mb's of ROM the pianos are really quite good. The key is to adjust the velocity settings to your playing style.
squeakD 2 years ago
hmmm, you could pick up a secondhand fantomX6 for only a few extra pennies. Much more functionality if you can live without mp3 support
boswell255 2 years ago
No, I dont think it was actually, well spotted.
sonicstate 2 years ago
juno 6 was programmable?
openchallenge 2 years ago