But it's NOT "chaos" that's the problem. Chaos is NOT usually the end result. The Founders feared something that believed MUCH worse than chaos.
"I would rather be exposed to the inconveniences attending too much liberty than those attending too small a degree of it."
-Thomas Jefferson
Histrionically, despotic regimes share in common a trait in that the government/dictator doesn't have to serve under a rule of law. They wanted the government UNDER a rule of law PREVENT despotism.
The proletariat was called the only truly revolutionary class! The industrial workers have been the driving force in working people's struggle for their liberties all around the world. The corporate elite in the North America and Europe have decided to pave their way to absolute unrestrained power. For that purpose they have shifted the industrial base to South-East Asia and thus rendered obsolete the only power able to resist them, that is the dictatorship of the proletariat. They have won now.
In the face of the corporate dictatorship, the only thing to stop it would be the dictatorship of the working people, first of all the industrial workers. In economics, as well as in politics, it is all about power in the final analysis. Absolute power, at that. Economic activity of the corporate elite is about who gets power, the position of supreme power and/or direct, or as close as possible, access to those in the position of power. Their advances are dictatorial by nature, they never stop.
Exactly, buy I would say.. no problem with women/blacks or fat people voting, but those who don't pay taxes, don't own any property (with mortgage paid off). They have no skin in the game.
These days when one in the U.S. says he's a "Constitutionalist", it doesn't necessarily mean he believes that the Constitution was perfect, & doesn't mean that he necessarily believes that the ideas in the days of the Constitution are "up to date", etc., it only means that he believes in government following a rule of law.
No matter how imperfect, out of date, etc., it is still a rule of law. If people disagree they can amend it, but a gov. not under the rule of law becomes LAWLESS
Hans, We here in Washington (state) are ready to caucus and become delegates for Ron Paul. Many have stood with me in 2008, but there are 4 times as many supporters this time around. The WSRP will have a much harder time cheating us out of our national delegate spots! We will be watching! We will be exposing the fraud! We will demand justice on those who break the rules and laws! They can't stop us this time!!! :)
This has been flagged as spam show
@Foldlet
"I maintain that
Chaos is the future
And beyond it is freedom
Confusion is next and next after that is the truth..."
.
-Sonic Youth from "Confusion is Next" 1983
.
RonPaulRevolution4u 4 months ago
Comment removed
RonPaulRevolution4u 4 months ago
@Foldlet
But it's NOT "chaos" that's the problem. Chaos is NOT usually the end result. The Founders feared something that believed MUCH worse than chaos.
"I would rather be exposed to the inconveniences attending too much liberty than those attending too small a degree of it."
-Thomas Jefferson
Histrionically, despotic regimes share in common a trait in that the government/dictator doesn't have to serve under a rule of law. They wanted the government UNDER a rule of law PREVENT despotism.
RonPaulRevolution4u 4 months ago
The proletariat was called the only truly revolutionary class! The industrial workers have been the driving force in working people's struggle for their liberties all around the world. The corporate elite in the North America and Europe have decided to pave their way to absolute unrestrained power. For that purpose they have shifted the industrial base to South-East Asia and thus rendered obsolete the only power able to resist them, that is the dictatorship of the proletariat. They have won now.
roneaone 4 months ago
In the face of the corporate dictatorship, the only thing to stop it would be the dictatorship of the working people, first of all the industrial workers. In economics, as well as in politics, it is all about power in the final analysis. Absolute power, at that. Economic activity of the corporate elite is about who gets power, the position of supreme power and/or direct, or as close as possible, access to those in the position of power. Their advances are dictatorial by nature, they never stop.
roneaone 4 months ago
Yes Hans, YES!!! I totally agree!
littlejeffmo 4 months ago
Exactly, buy I would say.. no problem with women/blacks or fat people voting, but those who don't pay taxes, don't own any property (with mortgage paid off). They have no skin in the game.
BlueSkies360 4 months ago
@farmanntv
These days when one in the U.S. says he's a "Constitutionalist", it doesn't necessarily mean he believes that the Constitution was perfect, & doesn't mean that he necessarily believes that the ideas in the days of the Constitution are "up to date", etc., it only means that he believes in government following a rule of law.
No matter how imperfect, out of date, etc., it is still a rule of law. If people disagree they can amend it, but a gov. not under the rule of law becomes LAWLESS
RonPaulRevolution4u 4 months ago
Hans, We here in Washington (state) are ready to caucus and become delegates for Ron Paul. Many have stood with me in 2008, but there are 4 times as many supporters this time around. The WSRP will have a much harder time cheating us out of our national delegate spots! We will be watching! We will be exposing the fraud! We will demand justice on those who break the rules and laws! They can't stop us this time!!! :)
sbeutler 4 months ago 4