Added: 3 years ago
From: TheRealNews
Views: 7,334
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (115)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • Ottoman right of return!

  • its all britains fault for making the new lines on the map

  • See Saddam and the Third Reich parts 1-11 for the full history channel version. LIke I said, if its not propaganda.

    Please share your info on this if you know of any falseness to this. I hate to believe everything I hear but for now its all I have to go on.

    Thanks

    Peace

  • The real question to the title of this video is.... What influences caused him to move to the right, if that is what in fact is happening.

    In that answer, you'll find the culprits.

  • This very same thinking turned the world against George Bush, and ruined America's image to the world. I know that the arab world has supported communism probably to accomplish their own goals against the UK,(Britain) and the West (USA). Hitler was allied with Syria, where the Bath/Baath party had originated, with Michelle Afluke, then The Grand Muftie, and Karalla Tufa (saddam's uncle) allied with Hitler. More history and facts from the History Channel..(if not more propaganda).....

  • The First Reich was the Holy Roman Empire, the german state.

    The Second Reich was the second rise of the German empire.

    The third Reich was Hitlers time.

    And I'm almost certain we are going through another rise of the German machine to conquer and spread their influences and gain control over the middle east, to once again gain control over oil.

    Britain was targeted for stealing oil from the middle east, which sparked the first war in the middle east against them.

  • no, 'idiots' are those who don't define their terms. I could call anyone a socialist and it wouldn't mean a thing until I explain.

  • im not sure the title suits the video... unless by "right" you mean dictatorship... (which it is not, it just means advocating non-governmental markets i.e. free market and private regulation. something more like "obama advocates undemocratic approaches for palestinians"

    great video btw, i really like this guy.

  • well obama fooled u all i knew it sob

  • Death to Israel! fuck obama.

  • All this posturing by McCain and Obama is just that...posturing. They're trying to satisfy their base while being moderate enough to appeal to swing voters.

    The thing to do is to look at a pols voting record to determine what he'll really do in office. But wait...Obama is so new he has no voting record. And when he has voted, he has a very high rate of "present" votes which means he's trying to hide his true position on some issues from the voters. Obama is an enigma.

  • " I Borack Hussain Obama do not like to pledge allegiance to the flag of the God Damn United States of America and to the republic for which it stands, one nation under Allah, indivisible, with humility and disgrace for all"

  • Swartznegger 4 president

  • who would you rather win?? McCain? im for obama, if only for the sole reason of pissing off the racist fucking rednecks who dont want him to make it

  • Fuck OBAMAAAAAA, He is a Neo-Con Zionist, OBAMA IS THE WHORE OF ISRAEL

  • lets hope not.

  • i agree, i dont think any president will ever have the courage to stand up to israel

  • This is about credibility..for me and a lot others, Obama's credibility is very low or nil.

  • looks like the real people in power have manipulated obama's point of views and now he is nothing but a pawn. I was hoping for change with him but i guess he'll move closer to the right as time goes on.

  • thats a damn good thing

  • I am very sad. I thought Obama was different. Instead, he is another George W. Bush with a different skin colour.

  • You should have known for years that Obama is just another political tool. He'll kneel publicly before his masters soon enough.

    Write-in Ron Paul!

  • this is hamas' fault. obama knows maccain will use the hamas endorsement against him. so, he needed to make hamas reject the endorsement. thus, obama panders to aipac.

  • So Obams plays the 'I don't support the war in the Middle East card', gets nominated and then steps in front on the podium to addrss the Jewish Lobby, who are essentially the reason we are at war in the Middle East, and tells them, "Oh I feel you Shadrach, Meshach and Abedinengo. I'll stand by your side and be ready to destroy more of your enemies even though it will lead the Goyim of my land to their doom because I believe that Israyel is more important than my own country." What a SOB!

  • obama..CFR...AIPAC ...

    whoever votes either of these clowns in office is a moron !

    kiss the USA's ass goodbye ...

  • obarm = more wars

  • Obama opposes democratic elections in general.

    The American people did not elect him.

    He was selected by the elite of superdelegates.

    Obama was always on the right. There is no democracy in the Democratic Party.

  • Obama received the majority of pledged (elected) delegates as well as the majority of superdelegates.

  • The remaining Dems superdelegates aligned themselves with Obama even before the tally of primary votes started. What rule do they respect and follow? Nothing ..they just abadoned Hillary, notwithstanding Obama's questionable association with anti-US, the Nation of Islam and gangsters. The Americans made a joke about Bill Clinton's not swallowing marijuana smoke while Obama was without a bit of regret, declared to the whole world, his enjoyment while smoking marijuana.

  • For starters, if you live in the United States, YOU DO NOT LIVE IN A 'DEMOCRACY.'

    You do, however, live in a CONSTITUTIONAL REPUBLIC, a modified and limited democracy based on the rule of law and natural rights.

    Superdelegates are elected mostly officials, and party primaries are functions of the private-entity political parties and subject to state law and party rules. Don't like it, find another party ... which is not to say both parties don't suck. They absolutely do.

  • well said ....

  • There is nothing left or right about war and empire. I cannot say that I am not extremely disappointed in Obama, but really, why should anyone be surprised?

    Here's a novel idea: How about the US and its presidents just bug out of the affairs of foreign states that have not attacked us and present no present danger to us? Why do we borrow money from China to give it to foreign states?

  • Jive,

    You've got to be careful with phrases like "present no present danger" or "imminent threat." Its throwing around loose definitions like this that get us into trouble over and over again and sometimes are used to justify wars.

    "imminent threat" is one thing that me and other Constitutionally minded people are working to change in the Republican Party of Texas platform at our upcoming convention.

  • Obama flip flops on every issue. He just tells the the group he is speaking to what they want to hear. Rev. Wright told us this about him. He will say and do what ever he has to say to get elected. He can not be trusted.

  • it depends on how you define the right.

    if the right is defined as conservative, with focus on limited government, civil liberties, and the constitution, THEN NO.

    OBAMA SEEMS TO MOVING TO NEO-CAPITAL LIBERALISM.

    his ideas of big government, globalization, and other neocon agendas are worrisome.

    his words point to a nice, well-to-do, person-for-the-people.

    but to implement positive change, when looking at his previous ACTIONS & experience, seems quite unlikely.

    BUT MCSAME IS FAR WORSE!!!

  • A week ago Obama was the darling of The Real News. Today they despise him as much as they despise Hillary and McCain. Where has the love gone?

  • I guess the real news is just faux news with a different name.

    So much for defeating the machine.

  • spoken like a true Jew

  • LOL

  • welcome to politics

  • Real News can have a slight slant on things like "right to health care" and man-made global warming, but I find it extraordinarily objective in comparison to just about anything mainstream, and very similar to PBS/NPR.

  • Hamas was elected by the majority of Palestians and nothing can change that. So those of you calling it a terrorist organization consign the majority of Palestinians to being terrorists. Should we be surprised? Nah, a large portion of the American people find it convenient to call anyone who refuses to see things their way terrorists or a terrorist state. Violence isn't even a prerequisite.

  • That's not true.

    The reason that the Palestinians voted for HAMAS was because they actually do positive things for the Palestinian people (building schools and hospitals, etc.), however, HAMAS is still a terrorist organization.

  • spoken like a true Jew

  • Obama and McCain: Different words, same objective. They're not the only choices, vote third party or independent.

  • The Palestinians have Jordan as a homeland where they make up 50% of it's population. It is ten times larger than Israel. Jerusalem and the West bank are the eternal capital and land of Israel. Once those boundaries are clearly established, that will provide much greater stabilty and a resolution of the Palestinian Israeli issue.

  • You don't get to decide that, so it's just your opinion which is of no consequence at all.

  • So much for "change"

  • yeah, so much for "hope"

  • Great report once again; I hope the mainstream media are paying attention.

    Everyone: please watch, share, rate highly and 'favorite' these videos so we can send a message that this is the kind of reporting we want from our news organizations.

  • There is only ONE race, the Human Race.

    Greed, violence, looting, abuse comes in all colors and religions.

    I would agree that for as much history as we know, white european christians are in the lead for the asshole greed prize. They have competion though.

    Calling for the destruction of people based on their skin color is harldly a step forward.

  • How much worse can it get than a candidate publically opposing elections?

  • by the time the election is over fox news will be kissing his ass for taking "moderate" (ie centre-right) positions.

  • This is a good news source. It's very direct and easy to follow without patronising the viewer. A lot of news organisation fail to put stroies in their proper context and fail to stand alone in their obsession with immediacy. Immediacy is overrated.

  • Welcome to the occupied territories of the United States of America.

    The American election is a shame, the real election for the american president is in tell Aviv.

  • Of course he has, he's a typical politician...what did you Obamabots expect?

  • They should have know when Obama met with Bloomberg.

  • Obama says he will not get around a table and negociate with murdering terrorists... That's it... I wouldn't ether. It has nothing to do with a party he dislikes! If they weren't terrorists, he wouldn't give a shit if they were ellected. It's their right after all. By the way, it has been proven that hamas keeps hostile presure on it's own people to stay in power. Why wouldn't they have been elected ?

  • Consider that the suffering of the Palestinians at the hands of Israel is what prompted the election of a group such as Hamas. Desperate times call for desperate measures.

    Also who gets to decide who the terrorists are?

    Who has a worse record for terrorism - the US and Israel or Hamas and Palestine?

  • Well, i would consider a terrorist one who kills people in large numbers and terrorises populations. From that logic, i would consider Hamas and Bush as terrorists. On the other hand, Obama did say he would engage tough negociations following the exemple of JFK, instead of going to play War as Bush has done. If the US government becomes a better one, one could consider that Hamas are terrorists in comparaison. My point is, if Hamas want's to be ellected the right way, killing must stop.

  • I would say mass murderers who terrorise the people are terrorists. Starting from that, i would say the Bush administration and Hamas are. Now Bush is leaving and the world is better off without him. The question now is, who will make this world a less shitty place ? Obama or McCain ?

  • Neither of them, you can be sure!

  • That's not true.

    That Palestinians have suffered, but under their so-called leaders like Mahmood Abbas and Yasser Arafat. These men are nothing but lying, cheating charlatans.

    My sympathy goes out to the Palestinians. One day they will be free from the lies of their so-called "leaders".

  • I've just heard Obama's complete speech at AIPAC. It's terrible! How shameful! How much impotence and shame must true good will Americans feel about this. Another puppet of Israel. Another liar biasing info or turning reality around. Omitting apartheid, the wall, torture, thousands of civilians captured and taken prisoners, stolen land. Who are the bloody terrorists? God DAMN you Nazi Zionist America! Jesus was always for the weak, for the oppressed!

  • Spoken like a true liberation theologian.

    You should look more into this Jesus fellow. He maybe not be what you try to make him into.

  • Wow, what a dramatic CHANGE in our foreign policy!! He will continue to demonize Iran just like all the others. Everyone, keep telling yourself that you don't live in a one-party state.

  • so much for Obama's speeches of "change." I guess Rev. Wright was right when he called Obama a "Politician who says what he has to say to get elected."

  • Look out Hugo Chavez.

    Your next!

    I <3 CFR *psyke*

  • Obama didn't come to free America of slavery, but instead he chose to backstab his supporters and drag them into another era of slavery!

  • nice video man

  • Just as a warning to all posters I find ignoring ColonialismisEvil as the best course of action :P

  • guess you've never read United Nations General Assembly Resolution 3379 - cos if u did, it'd give u an idea on who the rest of the world consider as "savage barbarians"!!!!!

    BiYatCH!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

  • Yep,

    That's what they are supposed to do in the general.

  • Hello, shouldn't Israel abide by its past agreements as well? They violate them every day.

  • It really would make sense if the videos were labled in such a manner (ie numbered) so that one could find the second part of the series. I have already made this suggestion but I guess such simplicity to help finding follow-up articles is too much a bother.

  • yeah, Americans will vote for change...change for the same.

  • I love how all the Obama-crazed Loonies are now whining about Obama being Pro-Israel. What did you idiots think he was going to do then?! Of course he's pro-Israel, he has to be.

  • What ever happened to Obama being an under cover Islamic extremist?

  • Or his speech to AIPAC is an act to get into the white out. You may never know.

  • out=House

  • I guess Obama is finding out the political realities. You cant run for president of the united states unless you suck quite a few jewish d**ks apparently.

  • lol

  • Obama - the candidate most likely to fool the most Democrats into voting for a false sense of change.

  • Obama is a warmonger like all the rest

  • Obama has made a fool of himself, I guess Mccain would still be worse

  • Some choice, heh?

    Bad and Worse

  • I'd say it's just the race to the center, at least I hope...

  • Believing we have the right to tell another nation that they can't have elections because we don't like the leading party is CENTER?

    WTF have we come to?

  • "Believing we have the right to tell another nation that they can't have elections because we don't like the leading party is CENTER?

    WTF have we come to?"

    We've always been there, at least since the cold war started, the US has installed and propped up more dictators in the name of fighting communism than I care to recall.

  • The proper way to understand it is to quash your conception of the political spectrum, because its all bullshit.

    On the left you have bloated federal government, foreign interventionist A, and on the right you have bloated federal government, foreign interventionist B.

    So what really is left and right? What is nowhere between that left and right is non-intervention, and constitutionally sized government.

    The lesser of two evils is still evil. Vote away!

  • Exactly!

    And those of us who work for a living have paid for it all.

    The big problem is most people really don't even know what the US gov't has done.

  • As a commenter stated earlier AIPAC owns the United States just like Halliburton. War makes money and peace doesn't. As long as Congress allows money from these corporations and others the will of the people, by the people and for the people will falter to the will of the corporations. Hence, the reasons why we have high energy cost, high food prices, no national health care, high taxes, lower wages, high telecommunications, and slave like labor.

  • That's anarchist rubbish you're talking. No reality. With Love From a Finnish anarchist.

  • If it is; so be it.

  • So help yourself

  • The things you describe are symptoms of the problem, and not the problem itself, namely, unconstitutional government.

    Corporations are a manifestation of the 1st Amendment's right to organize and assemble, and is a legal business entity recognized in 50 states.

    Federal Government officials and elected office holders swear an oath to preserve and protect the Constitution, and bow to pressure on all fronts daily. This is the criminality: your bloated, whoring, unconstitutional federal gov't.

  • Well corporations are not citizens. By giving a corporation the rights of the citizen, you enable a situation in which the pursuit of profit ecclipses the pursuit of life liberty and happiness. Remember corporations are sociopathic...to allow corporations to rule, lead, influence politcs or set behavioral examples in any way shape or form is to submit to the rule and will of The Beast. The problem is that we've allowed our politics to be subverted by the global marketplace and its proponents.

  • Corporatism is the natural affect of large, unlawful, federal government. What do you expect when a country with 300 mil sends hundreds of billions in taxes to Capitol Hill? Greed is part of the human condition. The founders knew as much, which is why we have a Constitutional republic with an emphasis on state and local governments.

    Out of curiosity, elaborate on corporations having the rights of people and how this somehow detriments our system of government.

  • A corporation is interested in profit and will subvert all it's decisions and actions to that end and will seek to subvert the law and the will of a lawful body to that end as any organization of sociopathic gansters will. A corporation is allowed to lobby and petition the government as only a citizen should but I am not allowed enough characters to fully explain such. I would argue though that corporatism is the failure of good government whether large and unlawful or small and ineffective.

  • You make it sound as if in the absence of corporations, none of those things would otherwise occur. A corporation is a group of people contractually bound into a business organization. What is it specifically about that business entity that gives it a worse connotation than a single entrepreneur paying off a government official for favors?

  • Well I meant to imply nothing of the sort. Ultimately the act of bribery is the same whether committed by an individual or a board of officers and it is the result of the lack of self-respect, dignity, honor, consideration and a host of other virtues which all should value more than coin. The danger is that a corporation has access to a collective wealth apart from the personal wealth of an individual thus making it both more powerful and more apt to use that wealth in the pursuance of intrigue.

  • And allow me to make clear that I don't necessarily argue that corporations are inherently wicked or should not be allowed to pursue legitimate business endeavors, only that when it comes to lobbying or petitioning the government, such a thing should be the sole right of a human being. If they need to, let the officers of a company petition themselves humbly as citizens rather than bulldozing over everyone while riding in the seat of a juggernaut.

  • It's no use voting! All the major candidates, legislation, and election results are under the thumb of AIPAC & co. The public have been in zombie mode even b4 the campaigns began. Read between the lines & Listen with ur third ear. Iran will be attacked very soon. By the way, AIPAC has Uncle Sam by the balls & he's coughing seriously.

  • I thought he had a pretty good reason for not liking Hamas. Don't they engage in terrorist acts?

    As to the title of this, yes he has to move somewhat to the right in order to win a general election. However, you seem to be reading into a lot Obama's words, and perhaps making interpretations that were not actually intended. Will he or won't he meet with Hamas? I don't know what the future will bring, but I do know that if he says he will he'll lose the election. Be patient, guy.

  • So if he doesn't like Hammas, the people are not allowed to have an election?

    Where is your logic?

    Who the hell is he, or the US, or anyone to tell people they don't have the right to hold an election, or they can't include ceratin parties?

    I think both of our candidates are war mongering whores. Can I cancel the election?

  • Anyone at war engages in terrorism. If you don't understand that, you are a chode. When men fight, women and children die, things get blown up and tempers flare, vengeance is sought and any sort of 'rules of war' go out the window. To call someone a terrorist when you are at war with them is to engage in propaganda in an attempt to label your enemy a 'criminal' in order to undermine the legitimacy of their reasons for fighting you in the first place. Ultimately you are just fooling yourself.

  • A solid analysis

  • OMG~...*Stop-It* let the Sen. candidate become Predz befor further allegation you Media pundit are utterly impossible!!

  • "allegation" wtf? did you miss Obama's words to AIPAC?

  • Let him become president before we point out what a lying, pandering, war-mongering, sell-out he is?

    WHY?

  • The problem is that Obama supporters don't have a clue about anything REAL. How do we get one of them to start thinking for themselves long enough to start to understand?

  • amen, that's precisely what I was thinking when he said that at the aipac. I do believe it may help his campaign, it isn't the wisest decision

Loading...
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more