How does someone get convicted of a murder in which he diced up the body, all of which was predicated by an incestuous affair, and then 20 years later is somehow eligible for parole?
its called a fucked up justice system. IMO, you either sentence a killer like that to life w/o parole, or you execute. I prefer the former, since the compensation required for a murder requires a lifetime in jail. and killing is wasteful financially.
@Albukhshi Giving the government the right to kill is what would be wrong.
Killing someone is financially cheap as sin. Hanging, gun to the head, or poison injection, or cutting someone's head off, is pretty cheap, even electrocution is relatively inexpensive. It costs hundreds of thousands of dollars for every prisoner every year. Monetarily keeping a killer alive is more expensive.
really? I keep getting conflicting reports about this matter; you and a couple of others say life in jail is more expensive, others say killing is more expensive.
now I is confused :(
well, thanks for the input; I'll bear that in mind.
@Albukhshi Well one of the things you need to keep in mind is that keeping a criminal alive is a constant cost, while killing someone is a one time deal.
@Mglosk usually the legal red tape is what makes killing they guy more expensive then keeping him alive for decades, most people fight with every legal resource to the death penalty and I can't blame them, I would probably do the same in that situation, t would be as bad if instead of locking people up we could rehabilitate them instead but that isn't what our system is focused on.
What's the name of the song at the end?
exacerbatedtaboo 1 year ago
@exacerbatedtaboo you would have to ask the orginal poster, i put a link to his video in the description
thisis3d 1 year ago
How does someone get convicted of a murder in which he diced up the body, all of which was predicated by an incestuous affair, and then 20 years later is somehow eligible for parole?
WeedGreenPowerRanger 1 year ago
@WeedGreenPowerRanger
its called a fucked up justice system. IMO, you either sentence a killer like that to life w/o parole, or you execute. I prefer the former, since the compensation required for a murder requires a lifetime in jail. and killing is wasteful financially.
Albukhshi 1 year ago
@Albukhshi Giving the government the right to kill is what would be wrong.
Killing someone is financially cheap as sin. Hanging, gun to the head, or poison injection, or cutting someone's head off, is pretty cheap, even electrocution is relatively inexpensive. It costs hundreds of thousands of dollars for every prisoner every year. Monetarily keeping a killer alive is more expensive.
Mglosk 1 year ago
@Mglosk
really? I keep getting conflicting reports about this matter; you and a couple of others say life in jail is more expensive, others say killing is more expensive.
now I is confused :(
well, thanks for the input; I'll bear that in mind.
Albukhshi 1 year ago
@Albukhshi Well one of the things you need to keep in mind is that keeping a criminal alive is a constant cost, while killing someone is a one time deal.
Mglosk 1 year ago
@Mglosk usually the legal red tape is what makes killing they guy more expensive then keeping him alive for decades, most people fight with every legal resource to the death penalty and I can't blame them, I would probably do the same in that situation, t would be as bad if instead of locking people up we could rehabilitate them instead but that isn't what our system is focused on.
thisis3d 1 year ago