Added: 4 years ago
From: drfloyd9000
Views: 211,646
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (3,041)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • Nobody's talking to you, eminaidiot. Geekess.

  • You can't compare human anatomy to reported Bigfoot anatomy.

    This is the same as comparing human anatomy to the reported anatomy of one of Santa's elves. Talk about gullible.

  • Sure I can, we already have 2 genuine examples of the species on film & video, the PGF & Marble Mountain both show the real deal unlike the 100s of fake clips. Albert Ostman's story, laugh if you want to look dumb, supports both later encounters by his own detailed descriptions of the 8ft male and 7ft female Sasquatch. She waddled like a goose with her pendulous breasts much like Patty, he was barrelchested with a hump on his back like the MM male subject. Folks really should pay more attention.

  • I can't be scared of what does not exist.  Gullible is believing in something without evidence.

  • Comment removed

  • No, you're just gullible like your friend eminbozo there. Like any other little old lady sitting there in front of your TV sets, scared of monsters.

  • @reclaimerReclaimer

    Dodge # 953 komodidiot. You make claims but can't back em up! Typical geek. Ken Peterson? lol

  • @eminboztepe What claims, you tool? I've lined out nicely why it's no hoax via human vs. reported Bigfoot anatomy, explained that time and again and given examples. Not my fault you're a gullible fucked up Kamikaze individual. lol

  • @reclaimerReclaimer

    You claimed that Ken Peterson and cartoonists are costume experts, komodoidiot. This makes dodge #955. Back your claims up you geek. lol

  • @eminboztepe Never. Geek on, geekess. lol

  • @reclaimerReclaimer

    Dodge #963 komodidiot. Ken Peterson? LOL. Geek.

  • @eminboztepe Spam away, geekess. Andre the Giant? lol

  • @reclaimerReclaimer

    Spam away komododiot. Dodge #965. Ken Peterson? Geek. lol

  • @eminboztepe Leaving all spamming entirely to you, eminafruitcake.

  • @reclaimerReclaimer

    Dodge #567 komododiot.  Geek.

  • @eminboztepe And so you did again, eminaidiot.

  • @reclaimerReclaimer

    Dodge #968 komodoidiot. Geek.

  • Wow you Patty lovers are sensitive.  You can say I am dumber than driftwood but I still float better than any you turds that think the film is real.

  • The footage is a hoax.  The burden of proof is on you Patty lovers. Until a beast with saggy hairy breasts is in a zoo or dead on a slab for examination this remains a hoax. Costumes can be designed to distort human proportions. FX specialists have gone on the record saying this is a fur suit. They are probably just tired of being engaged by you crackpots. We are still waiting for your proof. Where is the wall with the writing? Are you guys attracted to big hairy women?

  • The footage is no hoax, there's been no head piece found because there never existed a mask. No person could reach the top, torso's too long and wide so no hoaxing's possible. Have you noticed how no serious f/x guy blows off his mouth about it being fake anymore? They'd be laughed at even more if they did, so only their fans like emin do it now. lol Not only have they probably realized it can't be done, they've likely also seen the writing on the wall announcing the species' imminent discovery.

  • @reclaimerReclaimer

    Dodge #934 komodidiot. Ken Peterson? Recreation? LOl, you fucking geek.

  • @eminboztepe Get lost, creepy geekess and take your latests lame troll account there with you. Shit, you're dumber than a piece of driftwood. lol

  • @reclaimerReclaimer

    dodge #935 komododiot. Geek.

  • The footage is fake. The man who financed the film, Al DeAtley, confessed in recent years. Plus the head piece used to build the costume has been found.

  • This video was NEVER proved fake by anyone. This was hype and bullshit video analysis in documentaries in the 90s. Also, so many people have come forward saying they were actually in costume and just because a fat elderly oaf can do a similar walk doesn't mean a thing. I've even heard from Don Post Jr. himself that his father was involved in the suits fabrication. I've seen Don Post mask companies film work in the 60s and it's terrible. This footage is real.

  • Fake or real, I love this footage!

  • I watch his video yesterday,in history channel in the program Monster Quest.I appreciate very much your video, you brought out of the TV, +1 and subscribe

  • i think its a fake,

    it was after all filmed at a place named "BLUFF CREEK"

  • Shut up eminaidiot, you're not that hot.

  • @reclaimerReclaimer

    Quit dodgin' komododiot. Thumbing up your own comments just makes you look like the geek you are, lol. dodge #901

  • Comment removed

  • @reclaimerReclaimer

    Dodge #854 komodidiot.

    Geek.

  • Comment removed

  • @reclaimerReclaimer

    Dodge #867 komodidiot. Geek.

  • Every loser and faget who thinks bigfoot is fake you can take it and shove it up your moms ass

  • @cmulder123 You're a fucking moron. This & MANY other videos are proved fakes. People are fucking lying to you & you're to god damn delusional to know it. Grow you pathetic little fuck.

    It's spelled "faggot", not "fagget". Maybe if you had a decent education you wouldn't be stupid enough to believe nonsense like this.

    Educate your sad, pathetic little self loser...

  • You're wrong then, sorry.

  • I think it's fake

  • So you did again, my oh my.

  • @reclaimerReclaimer

    dodge #840 komodoidiot. My oh my, lol.

  • Yep, you're a hoax alright eminbozo.

  • @reclaimerReclaimer

    dodge #803 komodidiot. Yep.

  • Yep.  A hoax.

  • go look for some panda shit in china see if you can find anything

  • YOU look like a man in a suit!

  • One of the greatest hoaxes on record.

  • It's called reality check, eminaidiot.

  • @reclaimerReclaimer

    dodge #750 komodidiot.  "Reality check" has nothing to do with Ken Peterson, ya geek! lol

  • Dodge #739 komodoidiot

    lol

  • See, you're not too smart to go with that Andre the Giant Bigfoot.

  • Dodge #731 komododiot aka reclaimer

    Ken Peterson?  Hmm?

  • Then you're not too smart.

  • Well said superfaw---i agree totally

  • Dodge #726 komodoidiot

  • Spam dodge #3456 eminaidiot. 

  • Dodge #712 komodoidiot

  • And all that we already have, actually.

  • If this thing was real, we would've found something by now. A live one, a dead one, some hair, some shit, but there's nothing to suggest that these creatures exist other than some blurry videos.

  • And you'll get you none either, you major geekess. Stuff it, as they say. lol

  • Dodge #710 komodidiot aka reclaimer

    Ken Peterson? Recreation?

    Still waiting for an answer, you geek.

  • You got all your answers years ago, dodgin' eminaidiot aka seymourbbest, and you lost the game of what's up and down in the world of Bigfoot. Only madmen stay to troll on at this point, so please do, we need more good 'n' ready clowns to slap around soon anyway. lol

  • Dodge #702 komodoidiot aka reclaimer

    Ken Peterson?  Answer please.

  • I didn't know which pixel to watch:)

  • Wow, another spamming bad excuse comment from uber troll eminaidiot aka sewerblob. Peter Kenson? No answer, yup. Geekess.

  • Dodge #693 komodidiot aka reclaimer

    Ken Peterson? Still no answer from you?

    Geek

  • Is it really 2012 already? My oh my, how time flies.

  • Its 2012. Still not a speck of proof for bigfoot. With each passing day the lemming come to realize they've been duped ---seperate the simpletons from their money--its been done since the beginning of time.

  • Thanks for the answer, eminaidiot aka sewerblob. Geekess. lol

  • Dodge #686 komododiot aka reclaimer

    Ken Peterson? Hmmm?

    Geek

  • Get lost, eminaidiot. Did you return just to continue spamming as usual? Total geekess.

  • Dodge #682 komodoidiot

    Ken Peterson? Recreation?

  • So you think checking & re-checking everything, writing & re-writing or adding to reports - plus - peers (worldwide?) co-working on this is something easily done? They underestimated it all gravely by setting last year as the date, if that's even what they did. This year seems a good bet, but who knows, maybe there's an overwhelming interest presently in science circles we know nothing of. U certainly don't. It looks like they indeed have the real thing this time, U really have to ask every day?

  • Its 2012. Anyone seen melba ketchum or her earth shattering dnA report? Both seem to have vanished like a fart in the wind. Both are as hard to find as bigfoot itself it seems.

  • Nice trolling job, sewerblob.

  • Comment removed

  • Nope still not able to understand you. You've got too many russian glans in your mouth.

  • Actually no, it's Danish bacon you git. Go educate yourself seyeytart, we're tired of doing the thinking for you.

  • I can't understand you. You've got russian meat in your mouth.

  • Love the bitterness of this jerk. lol Now eminaidiot/seyeybutt, go recreate Ken Peterson.

  • Dodge #564 komodidiot aka reclaimer

    Ken Peterson?

  • Go suck some russian cock. The danes are good at that.

  • You have her picture, what more do you need...?

  • Its 2012. Does anyone know where Melba Ketchum is???

  • Comment removed

  • No addressing why humans can clearly photo bigger and deadlier animals than bigfoot but not bigfoot itself- just more personal attacks. To borrow a line from Emin

    That's dodge #541

  • Its seymourbbest's momma!

  • I thought this video is about the Patterson Gimlin film not Melba Ketchum.

    I reckon seymourbbest has the hots for Melba Ketchum. He can't stop thinking about her. I bet he masturbates to her picture.

  • Well goddamn we've captured rhinos hippos elephants grizzlies etc all of which are bigger and have killed humans so why couldn't we capture a bigfoot that would be smaller and that no human deaths have been attributed to?

  • That's dodge #543 komodoidiot aka reclaimer

  • I luv this video

  • Its 2012. Where is the Ketchum report? It was promised in 2011. Anyone who doubted such a report was called all manner of names by the bigfooters. Its 2012 where's the ketchum report? More name calling to come, I'm sure, but still no DNA report.

  • Will geek do? I think that fits it better. I don't see anyone calling you a faggot so cut the victim crap when it's what you've called others endlessly, so the main insulter is someone like you. The comments are there for all to find. As far as proof's concerned, you don't even believe they exist so what are you even here for. Daily, when you're well aware it's not coming quicker by asking for it and you'd probably hear the news somewhere else first, not on YT. More contradiction.

  • Personal insults aplenty from the bigfoot crowd---but still no proof. Here's a resolution for you bigfooter in the new year---forget the insults Emin and I have heard them all----and get some proof. Otherwise you're still the losers regardless of how many times you call me "faggot".

  • You're fooling no one with your dodges, eminaidiot aka seyeybob.

  • Dodge #538 komodoidiot aka reclaimer

  • Then why babble on? lol Again troll seyeyblob asks 'questions' he knows were already answered ages ago. -In short; they're no dumb apes, and in essence, smarter than the likes of seyeblob.

  • Yes Eugene why hasn't shit been found? Why hasn't bodies been found? Why hasn't fossils been found? Because bigfoot doesn't exist,never did. Nothing but babble from the bigfooters but babble doesn't feed the scientific requirements.

  • @seymourbbest Look, if you are walking in the woods then this monster came right at your face it's so big and strong and weigh so heavy tell me how are you gonna catch it? It can punch it can kick like humans but stronger they are real they're out 

  • Both answered, why repeat your crap excuses. A true idiot. lol

  • Dodge #533 komodoidiot aka reclaimer

    Ken Peterson? Recreation?

    geek

  • Bigfoot droppings have been found, apparently.

  • If Bigfoot exists then why hasn't anyone ever stumbled upon his shit!! Does he crap at 7-eleven!! By now a nice stool sample would have been found. Surely it would stand out from the usual doberman pinscher sample!!

  • This tornado blew it, I fear. I wasn't fake, the guy lied about it. There was no suit, ever. Only mother nature's hairy skin. Your babbling excuses have been addressed, eminaidiot. No point in your repeating yourself, even though you are crazy. Move on to answering our questions, please. 1940 suits looking like Patty? lol

  • It was a fake. I watched a Nat Geo documentary about Big Foot and they found the guy who was in the big foot suit.

  • Dodge #520 komododiot aka reclaimer

    Why are you babblin' now about 1940's suits? What does that have to do with Ken Peterson or me wanting a recreation (your claim)?

    Focus...stay on topic. Back up your babblin' BS you geek.

  • There is no topic here, eminaidiot. You need to focus on reality, and stop dodging D64's request for visual proof of 'all those great 1940s suits' you claim are out there, looking better than Patty. Get a grip, missy. lol

  • Dodge #516 komododiot aka reclaimer

    Why are you babblin' about anatomy? What does that have to do with Ken Peterson or me wanting a recreation?

    You're such a geek, komodidiot, lol. Focus on the topic and back up your babblin'.

  • Truth still hasn't quite sunk in yet, eh eminaidiot? Guess it never will, like psycho killers U deny your own crimes & the very facts. Nobody cares about your babble excuses, it's rock solid fact it can't be your bedfella BobH, simple anatomy facts told that. U just don't like reading it. lol So ignore these facts again; Patty's legs are visible & not resembling his in any shape/form, keep denying that. And deny this 2; upper body's too long so it can't be him. Explain that away & keep him 6ft.

  • Another long, babblin' bullshit post from our local clown, komodidiot aka reclaimer.

    No facts, no data, no dates, just worthless babble.

    Dodge #517 komodidiot. Ken Peterson? Hmmm? lol

  • Yes you're a clumsy guy alright gullible seyey, must be tiring to be so desperate like you are. It's been found to be a likely 8ft tall, at least the branch its head touched was that high. Be my guest and recreate that, smarty. The audio's totally natural, you don't seem to realize the distance between the witnesses and the BF, can't remember right now the exact distance but it's far. The joking talk is actually because they think it's real, they are both surprised and feel safe where they are.

  • Az---i can't believe you guys are still harping about marble mt footage. Have you watched that with the audio? The people in the background are laughing and joking. The people working the camera are PRETENDiNG this thing is a bigfoot. Listen to the audio--no one there really thinks this is a bigfoot. Would people be laughing and joking if they thought it was real? Would a real bigfoot be so clumsy walking down the slope? Afraid not. Its a guy.

  • legit

  • maybe he just doesnt GIVE A EFFF YOU CEE KAY thats why he just 'STROLLED' his big fat hairy A ZZ away

  • Yeah Emin how could you not know the average height of a nonexistent creature is 8 feet? Duh!

  • @seymourbbest I'am just saying seymour, the guy in the memorial day footage is little over 5 feet tall, even if all the sightings are fake, most people say they saw something over 8 feet tall.

  • More morons believing in a non existent creature.

  • Mermaids 56lbs? Man I like my mermaids with some meat on the bone. 56 lbs is puny!

  • Semourbbest, it has been thought that they may be nocturnal and not many Nature Photographers go out at nidnight to get some photo's. Also, it obvious that they are elusive, possibly sensing humans from miles away. In most sightings, the creature runs away from the human at first sight if the creature does not sense the human. Many people ask, "why wouldnt this be the case for the Patterson film", well, all animals are unpredictible.

  • So its 2011. Every animal on earth can be photographed and videoed clearly except bigfoot because no professionals have went out to photo bigfoot only amateurs? Riiiiight. You're ignoring the fact that a 5 year old with a phone video camera can make a crystal clear movie but we can't seem to video a giant monster roaming the uSa with literally millions of trail and security and personal cam. Riiiight.

  • now really if i saw that thing i would chase it and camera man didn't

    Fake!

  • @taylorcam321 he is scared shitless, he had just fallen on his knees out of shock and is unstable, therefore in no running condition, and lastly, these creatures reports have shown great strength and capibilities, so why risk your life/golden evidence you have just for a closer look...ignorance at its finest ladies and gentelmen

  • @taylorcam321 really..you'd chase something like that..i'd be scared shittless.

  • No that doesn't answer why every film or photo is grainy or blurry. Its 2011. Every other animal on earth can be photo'd clearly except a giant 8 ft tall primate roaming the USA. Why?

  • @seymourbbest because the clear animals we see in pictures and movies are filmed by professionals for the sole purpose of clear definition for out viewing pleasure and standards, however bigfoot sightings are more spiratic and home video made, as in not planned or intended, just an incounter. So everyday people have to use the materials they have on them at that moment to capture the footage. Also this was captured in the 60's

  • Had any good Bigfoot conversations lately, eminaidiot? No? Thought not. Not even some loser biting your hoax bait? Thought so. Well, we knew none of that's been going on for ages anyway, you've been way too busy spamming lame excuses again haven't you. lol

  • Dodge #463 komoididiot aka reclaimer

  • And yet the BF deniers go on despite them saying it's all boloney, haha, gotta love the contradiction going on here. lol

  • That's dodge #460 komodidiot aka reclaimer.

    Keep dodging, ya geek, lol.

  • Click bang...please please please , will someone shoot this prick

  • Well Emin when a bigfooter can't even explain why bigfoot can't be photographed like every other animal on earth you know pretty much anything else they say is malarky.

  • No, but we know that you're just about everyone else here eminaidiot, you're basically talking to yourself when responding to seyeybutt in your lonely desperate denial. It's literally impossible to find another poster that'll change the subject, as much as you (two/three) do. Hop, hop and away from the reality that smashes your nonexisting case to bits, most people don't even debate your mad beliefs but see right through them. You love a hoax? You're one yourself, the biggest of them all. lol

  • All bigfooters are related in the fact that they can't discuss any scientific proof so they resort to bullsh!t. I've still not had one bigfooter answer why bigfoot can't be photographed! Pathetic.

  • @seymourbbest I can answer that. The Patterson-Gimlin Film. Patterson's is the only one that's real. Freeman Footage, Memorial Day Footage, Marble Mountain Footage, Redwoods, Ivan Marx Films, Ray Wallace Films, all the other one's can be thrown out the window. Patterson's film is real.

  • @BigfootInternational i am in agreement and fully believe in this primate species as my other comments strongly support that, but i do have some questions, simply for conversation about our common believe not a disagreement or argument. What makes the Memorial Day Footage fake? A doccumenary id happily send had a Washington State track runner mimic the route as fast as he could, and could hardly match the speed of creature that was calculated..and at the end of the footage the (continued next)

  • bigfoot grows about 8 inches taller...they are still contemplating the reason but guess it is a youngling that hopped on the shoulders...just some food for thought. Thanks for responding and im glad to finally have a logical discussion with someone about this topic

  • @bballer1919 In the Memorial day footage the 8 inches is a mask being lifted up above the head.

  • @BigfootInternational interesting! is that proven or just assumed?

  • @bballer1919

    If you listen to the audio track on the Memorial Day Footage you can hear them laughing about how it's a small white boy running and how they are going to make money off it selling it as a bigfoot.

  • @eminboztepe YES! I agree! they were also obviously intoxicated, here's a nice quote from the video "I've had one too many". The height was shown to be little over 5 feet! funny when the average sasquatch is 8 feet tall.

  • @BigfootInternational

    How can you make the claim that "the average sasquatch is 8 feet tall" when there is no hard evidence that they exist to start with?

    The average wingspan of fairies is 5 inches. The average mermaid weighs 56 lbs. Gnomes can run an average of 5 mph. See how silly that sounds?

  • @eminboztepe Because that is the average height recorded in the sightings, real or not, the average sighting reports a creature that stands 8 feet tall

  • @BigfootInternational

    Ok, LOL.

  • Ohhhhhh...disiccitation ridges. You must be referring to that anonymous person that questioned Chilcutt's work but didn't use his name at the beginning & end of the article. Yeah, I read it. What was the authors name again?

  • Yeah Huckster bobby has real trouble with changing around what someone actually posts. He can't counter what is said so he changes what was said and then responds to that. Common bigfooter tactic.....

  • @seymourbbest

    Glad that I wasn't the only one to notice this. Bobby makes a BS claim, you call her out on it, then she changes the subject.

    Just like Komodoidiot aka reclaimer. Maybe they are related? ;)

  • Speaking of horseshit, that reminds me of the Peter Byrnes Bob Titimus Bigfoot toilet story. That about sums it all up.

  • Bigfoot DNA will continue to surface all over the place, we're still waiting for this latest bit of news.

  • Well? Who is this person that "schooled" Chilcutt?

  • @Hucksterfoot - LMAO! you're disclaiming Chilcultt's analysis and you don't know what dermal ridges are?

  • @bobbybittmanrocks "LMAO! you're disclaiming Chilcultt's analysis and you don't know what dermal ridges are?"

    I said desiccation ridges, and you (dishonestly) changed desiccation to dermal.

    Chilcutt wasn't aware of desiccation ridges either, until it was pointed out to him.

    This is just another example of the the methods used by footers; they either build straw man arguments or move the goal posts because they lack everything they need (conclusive evidence) for their beloved Bigfoot.

  • This is real cause best hoaxer of that time said if that was a costume every bit of hair so every piece would of had to off been stiched on by hand and recently confirmed by scientitsts the shoulders elbows hands mucle are all in different places toa human meaning longer arms if you dont belive that this is real ur oviously just some fagg that cant execpt the fact we aint alone

  • Don't worry JR, at this point it's obvious seymour's just trying to get attention. Nobody can actually be that stupid.

  • Ahhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh­hhhh click bang click bang click bang.....

  • Well said Huckster! Notice the room is quiet...no one will address the Ketchum wild goose chase. She doesn't have any Bigfoot dna but these bigfooters won't even acknowledge questions about the issue. But they want to pretend that bob H not being able to remember how many cups of java he had that morning is major!

  • @seymourbbest "Notice the room is quiet."

    They'll all be out in the woods doing their confirmation bias, Bigfoot tree knocking, adventure stuff. I am surprised they're not seeing a pipe smoking, spitting mad ghost that is still looking for the damn thing; that ghost being Rene Dahinden.

  • Huckseed, what's the name of this guy that "schooled" Chilcutt on dermal ridges? This should be good.....

  • @bobbybittmanrocks "dermal ridges?"

    What dermal ridges? Who said anything about dermal ridges?

  • That's one of the dumbest things I've ever heard. Two out of three of those people were skeptics before they examined the evidence. Now these scientists are hurting for money so they put their reputations on the line proclaiming the evidence is real if they know it's fake? lol...what a crock of horse shit.

  • @sterlingtate - you're 100% wrong, but thanks for playing.