Anyway I've a great respect for all the dead enemies or allies, I hope that in a future all european can cry all dead of the world wars togheter, no more brothers wars.
[3] English-France propaganda gave to Italy all the honour, we fough togheter and italians soldiers are bravest and strong, in WW2 we fought against UK and France and italians are all pussies and cowards. I accept a historical opinion that Italy officials, industry, army, equipment suck and Italy wasn't prepared to WW2 but imho for me is a great bullshit say that italian soldiers fough like pussies: el alamein, tobruk, tunisia, anzio, nettuno, cassino, long gothic lines in Italy.
why the Allies won??? well they had more of everything, and they were right when they made that quote "Who ever who controls the air, controls the war"
Von Tiesenhausen was a rat, when caught on the surface he used the white flag 'tactic' to buy time to dive down to safety.
He did this one too many times and a Fairey Albacore pilot ignored the flag and continued his attack which ultimately resulted in Von Tiesenhausen becoming a subject of the British Commonwealth (Canadian?).
la piu grande truffa della seconda guerra mondiale..........e lo hanno fatto pure comandante di betasom!!!!!!!onore al tazzoli e carlo fecia di cossato!
Not really embarassing. The capt. announced the sinking of a ship of the Marilynd class and one of the Mississipi class. After the war the US ammitted only the torpedoing of one cruiser (?) in the same period. So i think the capt. was thinking to have sunk a battleship, but it wasn't.
This is interesting because the impression we get in England is that the Italians were useless at everything and their navy never left port for fear of the Royal Navy . Here we see that the Italian navy did actually fight and make a contribution to the Axis war effort. Equally their air force helped in attcks on British convoys.
...but overall, the Italian navy and military in general was pretty impotent. The Royal Navy nad Air Force had unequivocal dominance of Italy's own front yard.
Untrue. The Littorio battleships class Roma and Littorio were more powerful and advanced than the Bismarck + the powder used in the shells was innovative.The only problems were the scarcity of oil and the ships' consumption compare to the old English fleet which was employed in the Med.Also don't forget Italians didn't have the RADAR and the competition amongst Navy staff and the regime's made every action an internal competition. The Airforce was never able to share operations with the Navy.
It is true because when you look at how the war went in the Med, the British practically had free reign of it's operations. IIRC, the Littorio was hit by only 3 torpedoes and settled it's hull on the shallow sea floor. Proof that Italy's navy was impotent was the fact that the German Afrika Corp ran out of supplies due to the Royal Navy's presence in the Med. You can't argue against that.
I guess you need to read more mate: Winston Churchill wrote a fantastic encyclopedia. Littorio wasn't hit at all. It was decommissioned and "melt". The Roma was sunk by German aircrafts with the fritz-X or FZ1400, the very first RC bomb hours before she was given to the allied.
The power of the allied in the Med was maintained thanks to the aircover not the fleet. The best of the British fleet was engaged in the Atlantic. They held only the pre WW1 ships in the Med.
@middxguy58 Italian navy was good and the most important success (for example Scirè u-boat) was on the sea for Italy. Italy haven't a decent equiment and good officials like Rommel, Montgomery or Patton and England+english empire pwned so hard Italy on land especially in Afrika. Anyway watch how italian soldiers fough in north afrika and in Italy, I'm italian and I'm honest, Italy isn't an "Axis power" and it isn't prepared to war like WW2, but I think that there are too many stereotypes [1]
@middxguy58 [2] about italian soldiers. English propaganda after Tobruk recapture gave the honour of the win to germans, now we know that this is totally false, was a italian victory under Rommel lead, so what I wanna say, english after marsa matruh don't accept any losses against italians, and ur propaganda build the stereotypes of italians cowards. In WW1 central empires fronts collapesed first on italian front against Austria, and Germany left the war for a new south front [...]
@middxguy58 Well yeah...In UK you also get the impression you won the war! MAy I remind you that the Italians did not have aircraft carriers and numerous resourceful colonies which also helped you having naval bases everywhere. It was our special forces "X MAS" which with great danger of their own life sank your Queemn Elizabeth right at the port of Alexandria! Without air cover, I do not know if you could always match our fire power. In the end I am not fascist so I am glad we did not win
@marcobagut BUt the truth needs to said! Should I also remind you that at El Alamein, the italians resisted to the last man and in Russia managed to block immense russian forces with equipment that did not match the russians' in any way...
Death to all Europeans!!!
HeiligesReich2 1 year ago
Anyway I've a great respect for all the dead enemies or allies, I hope that in a future all european can cry all dead of the world wars togheter, no more brothers wars.
p.s. sorry for my horrible english :D
QuadraroImp 1 year ago
[3] English-France propaganda gave to Italy all the honour, we fough togheter and italians soldiers are bravest and strong, in WW2 we fought against UK and France and italians are all pussies and cowards. I accept a historical opinion that Italy officials, industry, army, equipment suck and Italy wasn't prepared to WW2 but imho for me is a great bullshit say that italian soldiers fough like pussies: el alamein, tobruk, tunisia, anzio, nettuno, cassino, long gothic lines in Italy.
QuadraroImp 1 year ago
why the Allies won??? well they had more of everything, and they were right when they made that quote "Who ever who controls the air, controls the war"
LangobardorumEtrusco 1 year ago
Von Tiesenhausen was a rat, when caught on the surface he used the white flag 'tactic' to buy time to dive down to safety.
He did this one too many times and a Fairey Albacore pilot ignored the flag and continued his attack which ultimately resulted in Von Tiesenhausen becoming a subject of the British Commonwealth (Canadian?).
NEEBLAMMERS 2 years ago
the germany gave to italy a weak help in ww2 .
6fletcher 2 years ago
la piu grande truffa della seconda guerra mondiale..........e lo hanno fatto pure comandante di betasom!!!!!!!onore al tazzoli e carlo fecia di cossato!
iosantosubito 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Hand Selected Introduction For Professional Local Singles (meetyourfling) c o m
hawk
8169678
kalanag123 3 years ago
... very embarassing: The USS Mississippi and USS Maryland were not sunk by the Italian sub Bararigo. Both ships survived the war.
jansmuts124 3 years ago
Not really embarassing. The capt. announced the sinking of a ship of the Marilynd class and one of the Mississipi class. After the war the US ammitted only the torpedoing of one cruiser (?) in the same period. So i think the capt. was thinking to have sunk a battleship, but it wasn't.
shortdiver 3 years ago
This is interesting because the impression we get in England is that the Italians were useless at everything and their navy never left port for fear of the Royal Navy . Here we see that the Italian navy did actually fight and make a contribution to the Axis war effort. Equally their air force helped in attcks on British convoys.
middxguy58 4 years ago 6
This has been flagged as spam show
...but overall, the Italian navy and military in general was pretty impotent. The Royal Navy nad Air Force had unequivocal dominance of Italy's own front yard.
BlueonGoldZ 4 years ago
Untrue. The Littorio battleships class Roma and Littorio were more powerful and advanced than the Bismarck + the powder used in the shells was innovative.The only problems were the scarcity of oil and the ships' consumption compare to the old English fleet which was employed in the Med.Also don't forget Italians didn't have the RADAR and the competition amongst Navy staff and the regime's made every action an internal competition. The Airforce was never able to share operations with the Navy.
hydroptere 3 years ago 4
It is true because when you look at how the war went in the Med, the British practically had free reign of it's operations. IIRC, the Littorio was hit by only 3 torpedoes and settled it's hull on the shallow sea floor. Proof that Italy's navy was impotent was the fact that the German Afrika Corp ran out of supplies due to the Royal Navy's presence in the Med. You can't argue against that.
BlueonGoldZ 3 years ago
I guess you need to read more mate: Winston Churchill wrote a fantastic encyclopedia. Littorio wasn't hit at all. It was decommissioned and "melt". The Roma was sunk by German aircrafts with the fritz-X or FZ1400, the very first RC bomb hours before she was given to the allied.
The power of the allied in the Med was maintained thanks to the aircover not the fleet. The best of the British fleet was engaged in the Atlantic. They held only the pre WW1 ships in the Med.
hydroptere 3 years ago 8
@middxguy58 Italian navy was good and the most important success (for example Scirè u-boat) was on the sea for Italy. Italy haven't a decent equiment and good officials like Rommel, Montgomery or Patton and England+english empire pwned so hard Italy on land especially in Afrika. Anyway watch how italian soldiers fough in north afrika and in Italy, I'm italian and I'm honest, Italy isn't an "Axis power" and it isn't prepared to war like WW2, but I think that there are too many stereotypes [1]
QuadraroImp 1 year ago
@middxguy58 [2] about italian soldiers. English propaganda after Tobruk recapture gave the honour of the win to germans, now we know that this is totally false, was a italian victory under Rommel lead, so what I wanna say, english after marsa matruh don't accept any losses against italians, and ur propaganda build the stereotypes of italians cowards. In WW1 central empires fronts collapesed first on italian front against Austria, and Germany left the war for a new south front [...]
QuadraroImp 1 year ago
@middxguy58 Well yeah...In UK you also get the impression you won the war! MAy I remind you that the Italians did not have aircraft carriers and numerous resourceful colonies which also helped you having naval bases everywhere. It was our special forces "X MAS" which with great danger of their own life sank your Queemn Elizabeth right at the port of Alexandria! Without air cover, I do not know if you could always match our fire power. In the end I am not fascist so I am glad we did not win
marcobagut 1 year ago
@marcobagut BUt the truth needs to said! Should I also remind you that at El Alamein, the italians resisted to the last man and in Russia managed to block immense russian forces with equipment that did not match the russians' in any way...
marcobagut 1 year ago
thats the true the thing is that the americans lie because by the moment they have the power, jajaja poor bush jajaja
wolfgangamdeus 4 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Funny the italian ace claims to have sunk USS Maryland and USS Mississippi. A la dolce vita... lol
crowbaer 4 years ago