"Ideologically"? "Ideologically"?? Are you some kind of commie? Mind you I got my lessons from a lady who danced on Broadway in those days. Was even busted for "lewdness" and wound up on the cover of the Herald. Her brother did the first jazz concert at Carnegie Hall in 1917. If you can find the tomtom music, you need to replace this ideology with factuality. That music needs foxtrotters.
hi EdFugg - 'ideologically sound' is a term that's used here both in the right and left wing press - maybe it means something more like 'Red' where you are - it's used just in australia to mean 'morally sound thinking' - and i was using it ironically. i like the original music (as far as i understand it was) but i must say an update is fine for me too - if acting was done in the way it was in the C19 (lawrence olivier aid 'it was like singing) we'd die with laughter. cheers from sydney
@nickwallacesmith "if acting was done in the way it was in the C19 (lawrence olivier aid 'it was like singing) we'd die with laughter". So would we? Or rather, would you? It's not shameful to be ignorant, but it certainly is shameful to laugh about things you are too lazy or too intellectually challenged to understand and enjoy. Olivier was but a pale imitation of Irving, and today's "actors" who talk like ordinary clerks aren't even that. Culture ended in 1918.
hi chrisz78 - acting styles change - even language changes - if we were to walk about speaking in the language of Shakespeare (declaring loudly that we were maintaining culture) people would die with laughter. having said this i still think John Gielgud (to whom Olivier was referring in that quote) was the greatest speaker of Shakespearean verse - but if his style was used in the theatre today it just wouldn't play.
hi EdFugg - LOL. yes she may well have been moving to tom toms but i like to think i've made an (interesting?) creative (and for her, ideologically sound) choice. cheers
hi EdFugg - rather than go the obvious path of using 'primitive' music with tom toms banging away (which was done originally for her at the Folies Bergère and which portrayed the dancer as a native or savage) i chose something that epitomised the Roaring Twenties which Josephine exemplified.
@cha53z - and funny to think that YT thought the other footage i uploaded of Josephine Baker dancing was 'lewd' and 'infringed our code of conduct' - it was removed! some things never change. cheers
hi TXejas19 - yes, it's hard to see it as sexually charged as it might have been when she first performed it in 1925 at the Folies Bergères in Paris - it was originally titled 'Danse sauvage'. cheers!
@TXejas19 - that was her thing, though, wasn't it? It wasn't about raw sexuality - it was about naughtiness and mischief. The others would be getting their sultry on, and she'd be crossing her eyes & sticking her tongue out. Give the suckers what they were never smart enough to want...
hi jlovebirch - me too -not sure more footage of this closeness and clarity exists in the public domain - though this may reflect on my exaggerated view of my research skills - LOL - there is a longer sequence which i uploaded as 'Josephine Baker Famous Banana Dance' but it's at a distance and much fussier - i'm sure you'll have seen this footage about. cheers from sydney
hi BalletBabyBoy - and i guess it was Prohibition too - all too much for a free spirit like Josephine Baker - good there's film to be able to see what she was like. cheers
LOL....she was shaking it wasn't she??? LOL....
Famfriass 1 month ago
@Famfriass - one of the best shakers!
nickwallacesmith 1 month ago
She was badass!
missasegei 1 month ago
hi missasegei - yep, and in such a good way!
nickwallacesmith 1 month ago
I am a banana.
trboslav 1 month ago 6
No description required... Lord, Love a bunch of bananas!!! ^..^
ridovem 1 month ago
@ridovem - yes, it speaks for itself!
nickwallacesmith 1 month ago
Amazing stuff! She has all those bananas and yet every guy in the audience is convinced that she needs one more.
MarcBrewer 1 month ago 8
@MarcBrewer - LOL!
nickwallacesmith 1 month ago
She was gorgeous and sexy......all that needs to be said!
brill068 2 months ago
@brill068 - absolutely!
nickwallacesmith 2 months ago
Sexy Josephine back in the days when she was young and beautifull, she knows how to shake that thing
Ebelientje 2 months ago
hi Ebelientje - she certainly did - shook it with the best of them!
nickwallacesmith 2 months ago
Where is @theRedScarebot when you need it? Anyway it's always more fun to connect the dancing with the original music. AND, more... ideological.
EdFugg 3 months ago
"Ideologically"? "Ideologically"?? Are you some kind of commie? Mind you I got my lessons from a lady who danced on Broadway in those days. Was even busted for "lewdness" and wound up on the cover of the Herald. Her brother did the first jazz concert at Carnegie Hall in 1917. If you can find the tomtom music, you need to replace this ideology with factuality. That music needs foxtrotters.
EdFugg 3 months ago
hi EdFugg - 'ideologically sound' is a term that's used here both in the right and left wing press - maybe it means something more like 'Red' where you are - it's used just in australia to mean 'morally sound thinking' - and i was using it ironically. i like the original music (as far as i understand it was) but i must say an update is fine for me too - if acting was done in the way it was in the C19 (lawrence olivier aid 'it was like singing) we'd die with laughter. cheers from sydney
nickwallacesmith 3 months ago
@nickwallacesmith "if acting was done in the way it was in the C19 (lawrence olivier aid 'it was like singing) we'd die with laughter". So would we? Or rather, would you? It's not shameful to be ignorant, but it certainly is shameful to laugh about things you are too lazy or too intellectually challenged to understand and enjoy. Olivier was but a pale imitation of Irving, and today's "actors" who talk like ordinary clerks aren't even that. Culture ended in 1918.
chrisz78 1 month ago
hi chrisz78 - acting styles change - even language changes - if we were to walk about speaking in the language of Shakespeare (declaring loudly that we were maintaining culture) people would die with laughter. having said this i still think John Gielgud (to whom Olivier was referring in that quote) was the greatest speaker of Shakespearean verse - but if his style was used in the theatre today it just wouldn't play.
nickwallacesmith 1 month ago
Revisionist! She was moving to those drums. That's quickstep or foxtrot music.
EdFugg 3 months ago
hi EdFugg - LOL. yes she may well have been moving to tom toms but i like to think i've made an (interesting?) creative (and for her, ideologically sound) choice. cheers
nickwallacesmith 3 months ago
@EdFugg tell us more sir. you must know a great deal.
TheSunIsBlack 3 months ago
@TheSunIsBlack Yes, my child, I know many things. Many, many things. Which things do you want to know?
EdFugg 3 months ago
This music is all wrong.
EdFugg 3 months ago
hi EdFugg - rather than go the obvious path of using 'primitive' music with tom toms banging away (which was done originally for her at the Folies Bergère and which portrayed the dancer as a native or savage) i chose something that epitomised the Roaring Twenties which Josephine exemplified.
nickwallacesmith 3 months ago
hahahaha its quite funny to think this was sexual in 1925... they should see what sexual is In 2011. loll Artist practically have sex on stage.
cha53z 3 months ago
@cha53z - and funny to think that YT thought the other footage i uploaded of Josephine Baker dancing was 'lewd' and 'infringed our code of conduct' - it was removed! some things never change. cheers
nickwallacesmith 3 months ago
That gal could really shake her booty!
kangadillo 3 months ago
@kangadillo - she could seriously do that!
nickwallacesmith 3 months ago
wow
TXejas19 4 months ago
@TXejas19 very wow, cheers!
nickwallacesmith 4 months ago
@nickwallacesmith I love it, it doesn't feel as sexual as it looks though. Do you know what this dance is for?
TXejas19 4 months ago
hi TXejas19 - yes, it's hard to see it as sexually charged as it might have been when she first performed it in 1925 at the Folies Bergères in Paris - it was originally titled 'Danse sauvage'. cheers!
nickwallacesmith 4 months ago
@nickwallacesmith awesome, thank you! :)
TXejas19 4 months ago
@TXejas19 - that was her thing, though, wasn't it? It wasn't about raw sexuality - it was about naughtiness and mischief. The others would be getting their sultry on, and she'd be crossing her eyes & sticking her tongue out. Give the suckers what they were never smart enough to want...
cinnamonbrandylite 4 months ago
@cinnamonbrandylite your words have expressed my thoughts, where I have failed to do so :)
TXejas19 4 months ago
Comment removed
cinnamonbrandylite 4 months ago
@TXejas19 Why, thank you kind sir! (flutter) (cross eyes) (tongue)!
cinnamonbrandylite 4 months ago
@cinnamonbrandylite lol I'm a woman. Everyone assumes I'm a man, I guess my YT tag name must look manish
TXejas19 4 months ago
@TXejas19 ooops - then, thank you kind - nope, doesn't work, does it. (cross eyes) (tongue!)
cinnamonbrandylite 4 months ago
A nice snippet, but still searching for a longer clip that does her justice.
jlovebirch 5 months ago
hi jlovebirch - me too -not sure more footage of this closeness and clarity exists in the public domain - though this may reflect on my exaggerated view of my research skills - LOL - there is a longer sequence which i uploaded as 'Josephine Baker Famous Banana Dance' but it's at a distance and much fussier - i'm sure you'll have seen this footage about. cheers from sydney
nickwallacesmith 5 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
AHH WAY-2-SH0RT WHAT A RUBBER M0VES SHE G0T!! UNIQUE!! BUT THNX!!
fuelyournews 5 months ago
Comment removed
fuelyournews 5 months ago
She had her boobs out in Paris...the Puritans couldn't take it here.
BalletBabyBoy 6 months ago
hi BalletBabyBoy - and i guess it was Prohibition too - all too much for a free spirit like Josephine Baker - good there's film to be able to see what she was like. cheers
nickwallacesmith 6 months ago
@BalletBabyBoy Don't you mean the "psuedo-puritans"?
Ozone04p 5 months ago
amazing
bobo4890 7 months ago
hi bobo4890 - yes, thank goodness someone saw to it that this footage was taken, glad ou liked it.
nickwallacesmith 7 months ago
nick l am surprised how can you post a this ,some children could watch ,really would be shoked all life jajajaja
pediatrapaola 11 months ago
hi pediatrapaola - jajaja - maybe children these days should be required to wear blindfolds ... when they watch you tube!
nickwallacesmith 11 months ago