Gina Calmute at MNN w/John Gulino on Dr. Simoncini in Rome

[iiuva]

it is very incredible..how billions of dollars are spent every year on the research on cancer.. and they still don't have a cure??? I don't buy it!!!...out of the illnesses that are existant .. there is not one cure!!!.. offered by the medical industry... IT'S A LIE!!!.. THE GOAL IS TO CREATE CUSTOMERS FOR LIFE.. NOT MIRACLES.. THERE IS NO MONEY IN MIRACLES.. don't get swallowed in their lies.. hurray for Dr. Simoncini and his proven truth..

[dasgroovey]

He're another interesting quote by Dr.W.B. Clarke 1936 " I never saw a case of cancer in a unvacinated person."

[dasgroovey]

He're another interesting quote by Dr.W.B. Clarke 1936

" I never saw a case of cancer in a unvacinated person."

[qvocarlos]

Hey Quack, in your own words," She may have died from conventional (proven) treatments.." So what are you trying to say? Do you want to argue for no reason? What if you die before your parents. I'll be there with them to pray for you!

[markgg1]

@qvocarlos Im trying to give you a olive branch by saying she may have died regardless of any help.]

THe point I was making that this miracle cure, OBVIOUSLY isn't a miracle cure as someone just died from it. It is therefore fallible. I would like to see the precise success rates this guy has, as he claims 100% and from all the people I know treated by him (1) it is 0% success.

Not a good start.

Stick to a real trained doctor, stay away from charlatans. They will get you killed.

[markgg1]

And I would lile to add tat this woman from this video died.

Its not too important, as its one patient, so anecdotal.. she may have died from conventional (proven) treatments... but its tragic desperate people are seduced by these quack assholes like Dr Simunici and waste their last few moments of life chasing a cure which cannot , and does not work.

You guys are just as bad for propping this up.

[markgg1]

Im a little bit upset with you guys. Cancer scientists bust a gut to find these treatments. Because so many want to help people they are willing to wkr for less money, and lonegr hours then better paid science such as plant biotechnology. The reason big pharma owns most cancer drugs is because it costs millions to research, and small biotech firms just cannot afford it. Its common for a small firm to make a drug, run out of money and big pharma buys them. Its the only way to bring drugs to peopl

[paulagloria]

@markgg1 "Its the only way to bring drugs to peopl" if this is the only way perhaps it is time for another way

[markgg1]

@paulagloria Yeh I agree, maybe we need another method.

Maybe government offers more help to small firms to develop novel ideas, such as things like cannabis and even this sodium bicarb could be tested (as it hasn't yet).

Cancer Research UK funds research and does get a lot of money to fund research, so its not all doom and gloom!

its the quack cures we got to look out for.

[dasgroovey]

@markgg1 bust a gut? - look - if you look for your self - you will see that after 50 trillion dollars of investigation across decades of research everything that is known ( rather TAUGHT ) about cancer fills less then one side of one page in Guyton's Medical Physiology. And to boot - the fact - well researched and documented that cancer cures - natural and electrical were used successfully in the 1930's back to 1906...

[dasgroovey]

@markgg1 - and Rockerfeller owns it all

[markgg1]

The reaosn chemo is so horrible is simple: The proteins that are running riot in cancer tend to be essential proteins. Chemo can impede them, but if it stopeed them altogether (which would work at a very high dose) it would kill the patient.

The mere fact peoples hair falls out is PROVING that the drug is targetting cells that are copying themselves. Cancer is cells copying out of control (hair copies naturally, as well as intestine) .

Why is this so hard to understand?

[paulagloria]

@markgg1 "Why is this so hard to understand?"

because it might not be ture...please cite oncology textbooks like Dr. Simoncini has..perhaps I could then understand what now looks like mumbo jumbo double talk

[markgg1]

@paulagloria Yes of course. for simple explanations google 'chemotherapy' and cancer research UK (cancer charity) has good overall info on how it works. Macmillan, also and wikipedia if you trust it.,

There are hundreds of books, but maybe 'Physicians' Cancer Chemotherapy Drug Manual' for a start.

For more in depth science. 'Molecular Cell Biology' by Lodish has a good section on caner.

For even more complexity look at scientific journals themselves. Go to nature and tap in 'chemotherapy'

[qvocarlos]

@paulagloria Wow Paula, I remember Gina like it was yesterday. That was so sad, but on the other hand, I am happy to hear about your wedding! You are a good person and deserve to be happy. I'm going to contact you on your direct email.

[msquestionmark]

the interviewer lady has an artificially soothing and zen-like woo-y voice! it's irritating! very hard to listen to! use your real voice, lady! act normal!

[hunkydoryorder]

I agree entirely @msquestionmark

[apachejunction1]

does anyone know if the doctor is still practicing ?

[AAAninja]

these people aren't mentioning the yeast. the sodium bicarbonate does not kill the tumor or cancer. It kills the yeast fungus. watch the "cancer is a fungus" videos 1-3

[paulagloria]

@AAAninja this was before I read the book

[rare1walking]

Leukemia was helped in studies, by feeding the body iron, and then wormwood. A doc was searching for answers for his son with leukemia.

Chemo was invented to use the chemical warfare products made for the Wars. Check out Sloan Kettering's history via Eustace Mullins.

[paulagloria]

@rare1walking I was honored to have Eustace as a guest some months before he died.

[rare1walking]

@paulagloria He was such a dear man, and so knowledgeable. I believe he had cancer? Did you make a video of him as a guest?

Thank you...

[paulagloria]

@rare1walking he really was a dear man. I have three great interviews but now is not the time to release them.

[markgg1]

@rare1walking Please point me to the evidence for this storey as I doubt it

[1madaboutguitar]

She looks VERY ill. If shes alive in 5 years then thats all the proof people need that Simoncini is the dogs bits!

[paulagloria]

@1madaboutguitar Gina did die but she also did not do what Dr Simoncini told her to do. She was already very advanced. It is too bad she really wanted to live. I wish I knew then what I knew now...but part of the reason I know what I know today is because of people like her...god rest her beautiful soul.

[1madaboutguitar]

@paulagloria Arr, Im sad to hear that, Bless her. She deserved to live. I just seen your other tribute video. I want to thank you for paying her respect but also stating that she did not undergo Simoncini's treatment (except for oral baking soda). On a selfish level im disappointed also because I wanted to see what would happen. I believe in alternative treatments but there is also alot of crap out there as well. Simoncini is real though, Im just currently investigating him (without prejudice.)

[paulagloria]

@1madaboutguitar good for you...he has been taken through hell but he did get a great book out there. Hope the world hears more from him.

[1madaboutguitar]

@paulagloria Just to clarify, Im not ill myself.

Yes he has been to hell and back. My gut tells me hes totally genuine and it fits perfectly that he would be demonized in this way when you look at the way they supress every other truth.

I know someone personally who cured his cancer twice with enzymes and Limu . I think cancer can be cured in so many different ways. The 'elite' have had a cure for years but its just never been allowed to the public. As for them, Cancer= population control

[paulagloria]

@1madaboutguitar don't yo think we all have some form of "population control" wishes in us? We don't really know or understand the rich therefore it is easy for us to say it is a plan of theirs to eliminate us even though if we are honest we carry within ourselves murderous thoughts. Freud called this thanatos - the destructive, aggressive drive. Learning how to live with it is the art of living.

[1madaboutguitar]

@paulagloria Well, although we all have a reptilian brain that likes to judge, condemn, punish and even murder, I believe humans were given its gift of perception to evolve away from that.

The destructive, aggressive drive that you described has been manipulated to be at the forefront of he we live our lives through religion and social engineering but it is not normal. Humans are capable of so much more than this. I have no problem with "rich" people when i said Elite, I mean the manipulators

[rare1walking]

@1madaboutguitar There's a new population control with GMO foods. Dr. Mercola posted a great video and article on what this stuff does to each generation. Beware corn, soy, etc. I look for non-GMO products, but corn is in almost everything. The organic veggies etc. are also being polluted by the GMO crops. Some movement in Europe is beginning to speak out against Monsanto. Their greed and agenda in owning the seed bank, etc. is pretty clear.

[1madaboutguitar]

@rare1walking Everything you say about GMO is true. Monsato GMO crops cause multiple organ failure in small animals. Plus, im not sure your aware or not, but Monsanto is the company that provides the pharmaceutical industry with chemo drugs. But I will say something positive - its not in everything. Its not in fruit and veg its really processed food and ingredients you gott watch or buy organic.

And...this control system is going to come down ut it will get worse before it gets better

[markgg1]

@1madaboutguitar Monsanto GMOs do not cause organ failure. This is not true. No disrespect, but it shows you lack understanding on what GMOs acutally are. Its simply a case of putting a insecticide gene into a plant, to save spraying them. It is neither safer or more dangerous for animals/humans to eat but saves the farmer money.

If you are against GMOs on ethical grounds that people should not mess with nature, then thats fine... but its not true to claim they are somehow unsafe.

[markgg1]

@rare1walking Im not really into this GMO debate, more interested in trying to stop misinformation on cancer going around as I think its dangerous but Monsanto are a big corporate company and frankly are quite aggresive, but it is sture that many many farmers are using their seeds without permission, hence why they take farmers to court all the time.

Im no big fan of big corporations, but there is no evidence Monsanto are trying to kil people, and no evidence that the GMOs harm animals

[paulagloria]

7:25 "nothing is incurable"

for the best description of "cure" go to Jen Rog's blog:

420jen.wordpressDOTcom/2010/01­/11/truth-is-a-girls-best-frie­nd/

[qvocarlos]

Paula, I didn't know that Gina Camuti had passed away. She was a trouper, a woman on a quest. Jane Goldberg was also the bomb! Why is it that women know all of these things? I love all of you! My friends are doing well with Gina's advice from Dr. Simoncini thanks to your videos.

[paulagloria]

what do you mean "the bomb"?

[qvocarlos]

That's a term used by young people. It means Jane is the best and so are you. I wish that Gina had continued with Simoncini's treatments. Whether you believe me or not, my friends are doing well with the oral non aluminum baking soda. I learned that from Gina and God rest her soul. She is living on through your show and giving her testimony on the internet about Dr. Simoncini's treatments. I have personally tried this treatment and it gets my body into an alkaline PH in one day. I'll call you!

[1madaboutguitar]

@qvocarlos Im sorry but this doesn't look good now that shes dead

[rare1walking]

@1madaboutguitar The damage, especially 'collateral damage' to tissue and organs with the burning and poison used in this poor country, and the fact that many don't know how to build the immune with nutrients or that they have to kill parasites also, and quit feeding the cancer with sugar, is unfortunately in the equation. What doesn't look good, is the number of deaths and suffering with conventional treatment.

[1madaboutguitar]

@rare1walking Absolutely, well the world is controlled by interlocking industries where one creates the problem and and the other solves it (supposively). So what you mentioned is no accident. Thats just what happens when human beings are viewed as no more than cattle in the eyes of people like David Rockerfellow

[markgg1]

@rare1walking Eating sugar doesnt help cancer because the blood sugar level is kept within strict limits controlled by Insulin levels. Being overweight does increase your risk, but that is unknown. Probably due to lack of exercise, or maybe because you have more body material to become cancerous.

Conventional treatment is very harsh, but they work to stop dividing cells. This targets cancer, but does target normal dividing cells such as the intestines, and hair (hence horrible side-effects)

[redhead6258]

What really irks me is that doctors are supposed to be brilliant & I tend to think that brilliant people would be full of questions, inquiries, curiosities but big Pharma teaches them & brainwashes them to forget to ask questions & defy! Dr. Simoncini seems to be the only brilliant doctor in existence today. This says plenty for the medical profession as it has only become an establishment!

[paulagloria]

there are many good doctors and they have great difficulty getting their message out or lining up with what look to be successful strategies vs walking into machine gun fire. The more the common man studies the easier the job of the good doctors becomes

[qvocarlos]

Doctors are pretty much handcuffed to the status quo. Simoncini strayed from that, and that's why Big Pharma is after him. "What, there can't be something as simple as baking soda?" But there is, and so is hydrogen peroxide. Even eating raw organic vegetables. Then again, I'm sad because my own family didn't believe me. They chose the brainwash of radiation and chemotherapy. Go figure? I do have new people with positive results from the baking soda treatment. It costs under $5. Oh well!

[markgg1]

@qvocarlos Its because there is zero evidence these treatments work.... im glad your family are not brainwashed with quack nonsense as well.

[davenyc222]

Ok ..the outro really sucked too...But th einterview was excellent and many truths about the medical profession were openly discussed. That's a breath of FRESH AIR

So back to REALITY. Where is Gina today. Its nearly 1 year! Where is the followup on this brave soul? Did it work or didn't it? Hope it did.

[paulagloria]

here is the follow up...the last I talked to her she was in a relationship where she didn't want to hurt the person's feelings who loved her and was talking care of her but couldn't talk openly to him. I said "Gina you gotta do it ...it will kill you if you don't express this truth " well I got the call from the guy that she died. I misplaced his number as I would have liked to follow this up.he psychological level is CRITICAL...hence my faith in Jane G Goldberg, Ph.D.

[paulagloria]

oh yes after this was shot she actually had gained weight and improved tremendously but as I said she didn't get to the deeper levels of her psyche...wish she saw Jane who specializes in cancer patients and most of them LIVE

[davenyc222]

What a frustrating "video". intro. Is this supposed to be "artistic"... or Standard Public Access BS.

[AStarSister]

Hi Paula, Thank you for the interview with Gina. With August soon here, can you please give us an update on her treatment progress? I too have been researching Dr. Simoncini on the internet and have read his book, looking for answers to my health challenges. Bad rumours abound, and I have been looking for a way to know whether his is a safe and effective treatment. I applaud Gina for speaking with oncology professors in Rome.

[Sixpak192]

Hello Paula, Do you have a follow up on how Gina is going with her treatment. I would be very interested as I've been studying Simoncici's treatment for a few months now since my Father was diagnosed with Stomach Cancer.

[marilynnblock]

Thank-you Paula and Gina for the info.  Please note that it's baking POWDER rather than baking soda. "Bob's Red Mill" baking powder is free of aluminum and available at Wholefoods.

[paulagloria]

bicarbonate of soda is not powder...you want only that in it which is commonly known as baking soda....even arm and hammer has aluminum in it

[Owleyes888]

This stupid guy should not use the name shaman. His name should be 911chowmein or MNNdroppedcompletelymyballs or 911lostsoul-

and why is this host dragging him to MNN, he has no balls,- or perhaps she can continue using diappers-

he wants to be the center of attention- narcissistic and totally ignorant. Bull- HAHAHAHAHA!

[paulagloria]

gotta love those new accounts! Welcome to the YouTube community...it will be a better place for your keen and helpful attention

[hypnofan35]

There is a kind of social behavior that is non acceptance or "witch burning". That might be the best metaphor for non acceptance of something or someone. People usually like to stay with popular belief, or "other people bad". Drs. like to work withing group acceptability. The most important element of medical practice is going to be the "cash" or the "status" or the "school prizes". Patients might like speedy results, but Drs. might like slow steady results, cause it makes their wallet fat.

[paulagloria]

she likes them...40 yrs experience with cancer patients has taught he a lot...most of which she is quiet about as people think it is "crazy'. Many of her patients live

[hypnofan35]

There are some very simple "first compound" that have existed for a very long time. Na2CO3, is probably earthly, but CO2 is likely older than the solar system and a precursor to life along with methane CH4. Probably sodium bicarb will be found in space or on other planets and moons at some point. Maybe astronomers have already found it. i don't know that. Sodium does not like to exist as an element but likes to react with other things. Na (sodium) and K (potassium) basic to nerve chemistry.

[paulagloria]

Cathie I said that he is mostly saying the scientific method is dismantled whether is is allopathetic or alternative. He is saying MORE work needs to be done in microbiology and studies not suppressed or written up in such a way the important discovery goes unnoticed whereby MANY far more effective methods could work. This is not about one "miracle" cure but certainly is about deep criticism of the logic of chemo and radiation. He specifically moved the discovery to NOT be a "miracle" cure