If journalists would know in deep about his life history as well as his reputation as a scholar they would ask better questions. I would for sure, encourage people to read his books as well as other scholars before stating no truths about his person.
Just listen to his lectures in french and english, read his articles (and books) and think again who is """controversial""" when consistency and values REALLY matter:
Google Tariq Ramadan and visit his website.
Amanpour managed to go SO low in less then 3 minutes...
It's desperate to see so many people criticizing him without reading any of his books, or calling him an Islamist without providing any proof. First, he's not a part of the Muslim Brotherhood, and then, If he was an 'Islamist' as you say, he wouldn't be banned from six Arab countries (Egypt, Saudi Arabia, etc).. so get your facts right please.
He's an integrist, I should have said integrist maybe not islamist, if by islamist you only mean salafists. He's a salafi reformer.
Ramadan is a member of the Muslim Brotherhood, that's a fact, just because he doesn't say he is doesn't mean he isn't: it's a secret brotherhood and most members don't actually say they are. However, the fact that Ramadan teaches Hassan Al Banna's doctrine, quotes Qaradawi and has even written a preface for one of his books, shows he's one.
"Myself, in my position, It is all against implementing, not only stoning"
2nd time - 2:25:
"My position is quite clear, I'm against implementing them"
Patrickemin, you might want to learn english before posting stupid comments, Tariq Ramadan has always said the same thing, he's against it, but calls for a moratorium intra-muslims ulamas because muslims countries follow the holy quran. It's as simple as that.
She not only starts with a debate seven years late, she also describes what happened so misleading.
This 3' were really UNBELIEVABLE, it`s as if the interviewer knew nothing about his work, just very worn rumors that were debunked many times already...
Anyway, his position was very consistent and clear.
If journalists would know in deep about his life history as well as his reputation as a scholar they would ask better questions. I would for sure, encourage people to read his books as well as other scholars before stating no truths about his person.
magabema 1 year ago
Mince, se serait bien de nous traduire en français ?!?!
captainman01 1 year ago
Christiaon Amanpoor tried to ambush..got ambushed instead!
mrizvi0121 1 year ago
Is there anywhere i can watch the whole of this interrogation?
Oo786oO 1 year ago
@Oo786oO
Check your profile please, I responded to your question there.
MythF 1 year ago
tariq ramadan is very intelligent and very calm machALLAH
people must read his books they mustn't listen what they say about him on tv
he is a good man and he represents the good muslims
don't follow like sheeps !!! read his book and you can see yourself what do you think about him
misschalha1 1 year ago
tariq ramadan is very intelligent and very calm machALLAH
people must read his books they mustn't listen what they say about him on tv
he is a good man and he represents the good muslims
don't follow like sheeps !!! read his book and you can see yourself what do you think about him
salam tariq ramadan all muslims are with you
allah y3awnak
misschalha1 1 year ago
Just listen to his lectures in french and english, read his articles (and books) and think again who is """controversial""" when consistency and values REALLY matter:
Google Tariq Ramadan and visit his website.
Amanpour managed to go SO low in less then 3 minutes...
vitor1271 1 year ago
@DanaWhite0
and others..
It's desperate to see so many people criticizing him without reading any of his books, or calling him an Islamist without providing any proof. First, he's not a part of the Muslim Brotherhood, and then, If he was an 'Islamist' as you say, he wouldn't be banned from six Arab countries (Egypt, Saudi Arabia, etc).. so get your facts right please.
MythF 1 year ago
He's an integrist, I should have said integrist maybe not islamist, if by islamist you only mean salafists. He's a salafi reformer.
Ramadan is a member of the Muslim Brotherhood, that's a fact, just because he doesn't say he is doesn't mean he isn't: it's a secret brotherhood and most members don't actually say they are. However, the fact that Ramadan teaches Hassan Al Banna's doctrine, quotes Qaradawi and has even written a preface for one of his books, shows he's one.
Sokaku 1 year ago
1st time - 1:50:
"Myself, in my position, It is all against implementing, not only stoning"
2nd time - 2:25:
"My position is quite clear, I'm against implementing them"
Patrickemin, you might want to learn english before posting stupid comments, Tariq Ramadan has always said the same thing, he's against it, but calls for a moratorium intra-muslims ulamas because muslims countries follow the holy quran. It's as simple as that.
MythF 1 year ago 2
Ok so give us the exact time (minutes:seconds) when Tarik Ramadan says he is opposed to women stoning (just for a laugh)
Patrickemin 1 year ago
@Patrickemin i think that you do not understand English !!!
fariiid2950 1 year ago
Patrick, you simply can't grasp the wide range and complexity of transnational reaching out we all need, you seem to be the perfect cnn viewer.
And yes, he answered VERY clearly, just listen again.
vitor1271 1 year ago
She not only starts with a debate seven years late, she also describes what happened so misleading.
This 3' were really UNBELIEVABLE, it`s as if the interviewer knew nothing about his work, just very worn rumors that were debunked many times already...
Anyway, his position was very consistent and clear.
vitor1271 1 year ago
his position sound pretty clear to me and straigh-forward, why always try to over-complicate things?
libexzz 1 year ago