Added: 2 years ago
From: GTAstuntman101
Views: 656
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (53)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • Like said Airbus computers prevent pilot from stalling and overbanking the plane, but it naturally doesnt detect ground and doesnt prevent him from flying to it. Thats called controller flight to terrain. Its GPWS that is made to warn pilot from terrain, not fly by wire.

  • 787 is here and now. A350 is still in development way behind Boeing......again.

    They're always copying and learning from Boeing. A380 is bigger and maybe better but 30yrs behind. It ought to better, they've had enough time to learn from the leader.

  • @djdonman Well 787 was delayed by many years, A350 wasnt even meant to be released near 787.

    Anyway last year Airbus sold more planes than Boeing, so airlines dont agree with you and GTA kid, and thats what matters.

  • rn how to make them from the better Manufacturer

  • Comment removed

  • I mean type 1 not type 90 a sorry

  • @GTAstuntman101 the last one meant that I'm with you on this topic

  • @GTAstuntman101

    Boeing is almost 100 years old; because they made type 90 back in world war 1.

  • Stop talking like this, They are both great airliner manufacturers.

  • @boeingdude1 but boeing is older and has more experience

  • @GTAstuntman101 True.

  • Airbus is better, fly by wire prevents pilot errors, more comfortable and economical flying, and A380 looks much better than 747.

  • @Pvjinflight blah blah

    i hate airbus

    i will NEVER make an airbus fam vid

  • @GTAstuntman101 Why do you hate Airbus, when boeings have killed more this year, Airbus is more economical and it have better safety history?

    Or do you hate it because its not USA trash? :D

  • Airbus only started by the time the 747 is there already, theyre NEW to the market

  • @GTAstuntman101 Yes i know that.

  • @Pvjinflight airbus SUCKS! go on wikipedia and see how many planes were built for each boeing aircraft. Aside from the 717 (that was essentially a McDonnell Douglas plane), EVERY boeing plane that isn't in production at the present time has had more than 1000 built. Only one airbus plane, the a320 has had more than 1000 built! And see how many boeing 777's have been built as opposed to a340s. If you say the a340 is great think again! It sucks! WORST PLANE EVER!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!­!!!!!

  • @compdude100 Shut up stupid retard and dont rape caps. Who cares how many Boeings have been built, ofc more of them have been built as Boeing has been around longer, but it doesnt mean that its better, and today Airbus sells BETTER than Boeing. Ofc more 777´s built as A340 is not made anymore as airlines want twinjets now. Look how many A330´s built, over 700, near as much as 777.

    Number of aircraft doesnt mean quality. Airbus fly by wire makes them safer, you stupid american.

  • @Pvjinflight the 777 hasn't been around as long as the a340 and more 777's have been built than a340s! I hate you!

  • @compdude100 Haha stupid american shit, more B777´s built because airlines want twin jets because they are more fuel economical, and thats why A340 is not ordered anymore. But A340 is not only competitor of 777, A330 is another and if we sum number of A340 and A330 together its over 1000 built, bigger than 777´s number, which means that Airbus is leading.

    Lol i like arguing with Boeing fanboys as they think that Boeing is so great just because its from their fatland.

  • @Pvjinflight "Number of aircraft doesnt mean quality." WRONG!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Number of aircraft = awesomeness of an airplane!

  • @compdude100 So you think that Concorde was very shitty?

    Number of aircraft tells nothing about it.

    Ang GTA stuntman knows just as much about aviation as he can learn from GTA.

  • @Pvjinflight no of course not, the concorde was a wonderful aircraft. Well, I do like airbus--I actually like the a380, but it can't beat the 747 :)

    I STILL LIKE BOEING---NOBODY CAN MAKE ME CHANGE MY MIND!!!!!!

  • @compdude100 Yeah nothing wrong about it, I like Boeing too but I dont dislike Airbus either, both of them are doing good planes.

  • @Pvjinflight Safer eh?

    why did i hear 3 crashes involving fly by wire technology

    2 a320s and a case combined with distracted pilots, an L1011 tristar

  • @GTAstuntman101 Only one A320 accident has happened with something to do with fly by wire, and it was pilot error, AF296. L1011 is not fly by wire plane.

    Why I have heard hundreds of crashes caused by pilot errors that fly by wire could have easily prevented?

  • @Pvjinflight thers another one dude

    Air Inter 148

    pilot error WORSENED by a safety feature

    in that case, instead of preventing the crash, the fly by wire MADE the plane crash

    cuz if it were pilot error alone, it wud hav missed the mountain

  • @GTAstuntman101 Bullshit. Pilot setted negative vertical speed to be much bigger than normally, and because that plane didnt have GPWS (now probably every commercial airliner has it), and there was some clouds pilot just flew plane to mountain. That could have happened on Boeing with no GPWS too, they have just same kind of vertical speed system and everything.

    So your comment is completely false, and you dont know more about aviation than you learn from GTA.

  • @Pvjinflight thats because it was confused with descent angle u rick that always slips and cant stand up!

  • @GTAstuntman101 It was pilots fail, he left autopilot to vertical speed mode instead of Flight path angle mode, and entered 33 for 3.3 descent angle, but because he forgot vertical speed mode on it was descent rate of 3300 feet per minute.

    So it was 100% pilot error, nothing to do with fly by wire or autopilot malfunction.

    Thats fact. And btw more Boeings have crashed in last years.

  • @Pvjinflight nope, not 100%

    investigators tested if that alone could cause the crash, but it didn't

    the flybywire has contributed to the crash dude

    and u never admitted it

  • @GTAstuntman101 Rubbish from your own stupid brains, plane just descended to mountain and it had nothing to do with fly by wire. It was controlled flight to terrain, nothing else. If you set plane to descend it will descend until it hits the ground, currently no plane has system that automatically prevents it from flying to ground if pilots do nothing. Of course GPWS would have prevented this accident, but Air Inter was one of last carriers with no GPWS on their planes.

  • @GTAstuntman101 So even anyone with no knowledge from anyone can understand that making plane to descend to the clouds over mountains with no GPWS onboard can cause accident without anything else.

    This was fault of pilots for wrong setting, and Air Inter for not getting GPWS (which is in pretty much every commercial airliner today).

    Thats also what official investigators said, you are just lying about everything as you cant defend Boeing any other way.

  • @Pvjinflight if the vertical speed display is different from flight angle display, we wudnt be arguing right now

    and it's Air Inter's fault if they are money minded and not safety minded

  • @GTAstuntman101 Well its still pilots fault, there is many more buttons in airplane that have more than one position, and setting it to wrong position can cause accident, so I dont see how flight angle should be different.

    And yeah Air Inter and pilots of that flight are ones to be blamed from this accident.

  • @Pvjinflight why not hook up the GPWS with the fly by wire so that the plane dont crash into mountain

  • @GTAstuntman101 Nah, GPWS is meant to be system that warns and informs pilot, it can sound also when making steep approach and stuff like that, its not really possible to make plane to react right way to warning that can come both from making little too steep approach to airport and from approaching side of mountain.

  • @Pvjinflight but what can pilot do when his GPWS sounds when its not hin who flys the plane?

    pushing a button can waste precious time to save people

  • @GTAstuntman101 He just needs to pull up from sidestick, autopilot will automatically disconnect just like if you pull yoke in Boeing when autopilot is on.

    Fly by wire doesnt fly the plane, and pilot can fly it manually (not only autopilot), fly by wire just prevents him from going behind safe zone like stalling or overbanking the plane, but pilot still has full manual controlinside safe area.

  • @Pvjinflight ah, come on

    i heard of an A320 crashing into mountains because of this fly by wire thingy

    and another........

    and another........

  • 1:27-- yaay! it's alaska airlines

  • Boeing rules, today, tomorrow, 4-ever. And what history has Airbus except building planes that are shit ugly (A-380) or just crash and fall apart.

  • @Sooksawaspakdee961 true, very well said

  • Nice vid

  • there is actually one plane missing,

    boeing's earliest plane, the Boeing 247

  • Fail

  • why? what is wrong? did this lack info?

  • the quality is abysmal, even with HQ on

  • did u learn something?

  • nothing i wasn't already aware of...make a new vid with higher quality pictures and other people will appreciate it much more

  • then i need to pay for Vegas Pro 8!!!!!

  • Comment removed

  • @GTAstuntman101 no you don't. when you save a movie in Movie maker, make sure that the quality selected is "hi quality video." Then maybe it will save in a better quality. :)

  • is kind the same just a little bit better

  • it's WMV

  • nice video but bad quality

  • press the HQ button

Loading...
Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more