Added: 4 years ago
From: riverdean7
Views: 2,627
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (31)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • I saw on an interview with john leer about moon bases that the engine recovered near wtc was a GE and the 757 uses p+w engines and i have seen nothing about this fact anywhere else i bet the military version used the p+w as a friend that used to work there said they had a lot of military contracts

  • It was a Fucken inside job, if you cant see that it was a controled demolition your a bloody idiot

  • being a new zealand citizen i get this magazine.awesome,covers everything a truthsekker wants to know

  • were and how do u get it?

  • @TheRapResurrection i get mine from countdown ,a handful of dairies have them they usually up the top back hidden away i grab about 5 and put them in the front spread along the bottom

  • I was in NewYork,vacation last week, and everyone(about 12-14 different people) I spoke too about 9/11 They r all convinced that Muslim Terrorists were the attackers! and more then half of these people were quick to insult me- 4 doubting my always honest USA goverment...P.S. beware of the Jewish community there, their very bitter and disrespectful!!!

  • He is right, 911 was a inside job, yes building 7 is a big givaway, the pentagon was a big givaway with no plane wreckage, shanksville (flight 93) was a big givaway....no wreckage, the media was in on all of it, thermite deposits on the steel frames of the two towers, the passenger lists that were all wrong, the terrorists who are still alive and kicking, the fireman who saw the explosions going off, the list goes on and on and on....................theres to much evidence!!!!!

  • anyone done the links on helen clark and the current government?

  • In 1999 22 army phyops members started working at CNN and god knows where else. Mediascum are drugged up to there eyeballs.

  • Listen to the way they report it like its some sort of wacky theory, the news media are a bunch of cowards and are obviously only interested in making their bosses happy. DO you not feel any necessity to inform the public of the big picture? the evidence is overwhelming and EXPOSES some of the most evil plotters in the world but no people you go watch shortland street or home and away and dont dare challenge what the media feeds you. If you wanna know as much as poss watch "Zeitgeist" online

  • Overwhelming, scientific, forensic, engineering, mathematical, video, photographic, expert opinion, whistle blower and survivor/witness testimony evidence exists as well as clear government deceptions. That provides beyond any slightest shadow of a doubt and can be proven in a court of law that 9/11 WAS AN INSIDE JOB. Anyone who believes otherwise is uninformed. KNOW THE TRUTH!

  • did u get your explanation for building 7s collapse from a bathroom wall,why did the us gov do it why do u think,the reasons are endless if u cant work this out for yourself then u need to do more research yeah i know about the first 93 wtc attack so what,u mean the 93 attack where the fbi cooked the bomb and trained the driver

  • okay building 7 collapsed with all the extra weight of the 2 fallen towers on top of it, plus the fires that weakend the structure. there were several other building that surrounded the WTC's that collapse. 2ndly, why would the american govt do this? and have u forgotten this is the 2nd attack, there was one back n 1993

  • gilbertneon wrote; "okay building 7 collapsed with all the extra weight of the 2 fallen towers on top of it,"

    HAHAHA OMG ROTFLMAO hehehe - gowon now tell us the world is flat, gowon, rofl!!!

    Silversteen quoted as saying they decided to "pull" building 7, his own words.

    You have visible key sheer line in the collapse that points too controlled demolition.

    You have molten pools of sulphurized steel/iron in the basement of 7 - same as towers (evidence of thermite use ie; explosives.)

  • wow great debate, now i beleive it was an inside job. kudos. [sarcasm]

    you should have been in one of those towers or in those planes instead of the innocent people who died bc the US gov't wanted to war. pfft. w/e

  • Wow, ignorance abounds - you're not going to try and rebuff any of those FACTS?

    You're just going to dismiss it all outright and cling to the fragile strands of fantasy that keep your imploding version of reality intact?

    Thanks for the nasty death wishes too, shows what a well balanced human being you are.

    Obama zombie by any chance ?

    Got any lil' Fox gems you'd like to ennounciate while your here? Maybe that I'm "unpatrotic" and "don't support the troops" doesn't really work does it?

  • 3 QUESTIONS 911 TRUTHERS DON'T WANT YOU TO ASK THEM:

    If explosions were heard in the basement of WTC 1, why did the building fail at the point of impact?

    If the WTC was destroyed in a controlled demolition, how did the nanothermite charges survive the plane impacts and how did the perpetrators know exactly where the planes would hit the building?

    How do you explain Khalid Sheikh Mohammed’s confession to planning 911 in an Al Jazeera interview back in 2002?

  • ctcole77 "If explosions were heard in the basement of WTC 1, why did the building fail at the point of impact?"

    They didn't fail at the point of impact. The buildings structures failed en mass. They collapsed in free fall speed, there was no resistance from the structure beneath it.

    There is plenty of visual evidence on tape from the day of many charges blowing out the floors in sequence as well as anecdotal evidence of firemen on site that saw/heard explosions attributed to controlled demo.

  • @LemmingHerda

    Oh really, then why didn't we hear a plethora of explosions? When each floor collapsed pressure forced air out of the windows. This is old news. Sure they heard transformers and electrical panels explode, but no controlled demolition.

    Again, ABSOLUTELY NO BUILDING COLLAPSED AT FREEFALL ON 911.

    And freefall isn't even a speed Mr. Science.

    911 TRUTH DEBUNKED (yet again)!

  • @ctcole77 how did the nanothermite charges survive the plane impacts, how did the perpetrators know exactly where the planes would hit?

    The thermite charges were obviously throughout the building to yield the massive failure and freefall of the buildings structure. The planes damaged a relatively small area of each building. Theres experienced skilled pilot testimony on record that the manouvers some of the planes made were beyond their ability and conjecture on them being autopiloted

  • @LemmingHerda

    What video did you watch? The buildings CLEARLY failed at the point of impact. Nice try LIAR.

    Absolutely no building collapsed at freefall on 911.

    Despite Hanjour's poor reviews, he did have some ability as a pilot, said chief flight instructor Marcel Bernard of Freeway Airport. "There's no doubt in my mind that once that [hijacked jet] got going, he could have pointed that plane at a building and hit it."

    911 TRUTH DEBUNKED!

  • @ctcole77 "How do you explain Khalid Sheikh Mohammed’s confession to planning 911 in an Al Jazeera interview back in 2002?"

    How do you explain Osama Bin Ladens immediate and constant claim of no involvement? He was keen enough to step forward and claim ownership for other bombings and terrorist atrocities?

    How do you explain Anwar Al-Awlaki (a known terrorist organiser) dining at the pentagon as a guest of top brass a few months AFTER the 911 "attacks". (Mainstream info' even)

  • @LemmingHerda

    This isn't a game show. There's no need to phrase your "answers" in the form of an unrelated question.

    ANSWER THE QUESTION! NO 911 TWOOFER QUESTION DODGING ALLOWED!

    How do you explain Khalid Sheikh Mohammed’s confession to planning 911 in an Al Jazeera interview back in 2002?

    Before you give some stupid answer like "torture", you might want to make a note that Al Jazeera doesn't water board their interviewees.

    911 TRUTH DEBUNKED (once again)!

  • @ctcole77

    KSM can claim/say what he wants to who he wants, doesn't mean it is so, doesn't mean it even happened.

    Hell, s'posedly at their own admissions GW Bush bought "peace" to Iraq and Al Gore invented the internet, doesn't make either so.

  • @LemmingHerda

    Al Gore NEVER said he invented the internet. That's just partisan attackers taking his words out of context.

    Bush brought democracy to Iraq, albeit at at high cost.

    What kind of moron admits to killing 3000 people if he didn't do it? He confessed to planning 911 NUMEROUS times. Deal with it. You're just mad because his confession doesn't fit into your magical theories. :(

    And you still haven't answered the question. SURPRISE!

    911 TRUTH DEBUNKED!

  • @ctcole77

    Oh god, you're an Al Gore sycophant and you believe all that crap GW Bush rhetoric about democratic Iraq, notice I actually said "...bought peace to Iraq", ... I expect you have you Fox mantras confused there for a second.

    Have a Merry Christmas whilst you ignore your heros carbon tax ponsi-scheme and one million dead Iraqi's - is that where they get their "peace" from ? Doh!

    Why would I bother answering you anymore? You just return your obtuse "911 debunked" rhetoric.

  • 3 QUESTIONS 911 TRUTHERS DON'T WANT YOU TO ASK THEM:

    If NORAD was told to “stand down” how do you explain F-15 fighters ordered to intercept the high-jacked planes 6 minutes after WTC 1 was hit?

    How can Dick Cheney order NORAD to “stand down” if he was never in charge of NORAD?

    If WTC 7 was destroyed via controlled demolition, how do you explain firefighters predicting the building's collapse 7 hours in advance?

  • @ctcole77

    You know I was giving you the benefit of the doubt and answering your questions.

    However if you are going to pose a question and then "qualify" it immediately as "debunked" just by merit of asking it, ... theres no point talking to a wall.

    Thanks for attempting to put words in my mouth.

    You haven't "debunked" anything.

    How about instead of tagging your posts "911 Truth debunked" you just sub-in Howard Sterns monicker "BabaBooey" or something that is more befitting your style.

  • w w w . you tube . com / watch ?v = o MyrF Y45 NN8

    w w w . you tube . com / watch ?v= 7WY dAJQ V100

  • w w w . you tube . com / watch ?v= 7WYd AJQV 100

    w w w . you tube . com / watch ?v= nY- 0OMAqN qI

    w w w . you tube . com / watch ?v= oMyr FY4 5NN8

    Anyone that still thinks steal framed buildings free fell on 911 Without the help of thermite is insane.

  • This guy is smart and has looked at the evidence, coming to the only real conclusion possible: 9/11 was an inside job.

    Thanks for posting this video riverdean7. Now you can expect two kinds of "debunkers" posting nasty comments: oblivious right-wing morons who'd support Bush and Cheney even if they ate aborted fetuses for breakfast every morning, and LYING SHILLS WORKING TO MAINTAIN THE ONGOING COVERUP FOR THE MASS MURDERERS.

    .

  • bump

Loading...
Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more