When I was quoting Quran 6:45 and 2Cor4:4 to PROVE that Allah is The LORD of the WORLDS and so SATAN, I did not realise that in fact 2Cor 4:4 is the same passage COPIED by Mohammad in that Quran verse.
Compare 2Cor4:4 with these two Quran verses and find proof that Mohammad copied the NEW TESTAMENT PAUL and was IGNORANT that the rest of the Bible (especially PAUL) uses this phrase “GOD of this WORLD” as another name for SATAN.
3 But if our gospel be hid, it is hid to them that are lost:
.
4 In whom “the god of this world hath blinded the minds of them” which believe not, lest the light of the glorious gospel of Christ, who is the image of God, should shine unto them.
' As to those who reject Faith, it is the same to them whether thou warn them or do not WARN THEM; they will not believe - ALLAH hath set a SEAL on their hearts and on their hearing, and on their eyes is a viel; GREAT is the PENALTY they (incur ). '
Mohammad read GOD of this world in 2Cor4:4 and assumed that the GOD mentioned there meant the TRUE GOD.
This is another GREAT irrefutable PROOF that Mohammad copied the Bible but with no INSPIRATION from God. Thus his INSPIRATION is of the DEMON, who possessed him on their 1st ENCOUNTER.
BUT MOST IMPORTANTLY, the greatest verse used by MUSLIMS to try to PROVE to us we are blinded by God (ALLAH) and are of the DEVIL is PAUL’s WRITING about people like MUSLIMS blinded by SATAN not God.
Everyone also note; my discuss ABOVE also proves that;
(1) the Bible read by Mohammad is the same Bible we have TODAY.
(2) as Mohammad COPIED Paul in 2Corinthians 4, he must have understood that the FAITH talked about is "The Glorious Gospel of Christ". However, he left this out but instead put FAITH which MUSLIMS and MOHAMMAD take to be ISLAM.
(3) Therefore the FAITH Islam = Anti-Christ Gospel = Anti-Christ.
The STOLEN writings of PAUL by Mohammad CONFIRMS 100% that Mohammad understood the GOSPELS but rejected it and REPLACED it with ISLAM - a new GOSPEL = a new FAITH.
So, while we were correct all along in identifying ISLAM as Anti-Christ, 2 Corinthians chapter 4 proves it beyond any SHADOW of DOUBT.
MOHAMMAD copied PAUL writings and TWISTED Paul's GOSPEL of CHRIST into GOSPEL of ISLAM.
Did QURAN say he did not die but was made to appear so and was REALLY replaced by whom? Angel jibreel a.k.a.Dhiya?
And, I gather QURAN (i.e. Mo-mad) did not talk about his man years, he remained a baby reciting "I am the Messiah" and was playing with his doll clay birds and turning them into live birds?
Just like the QURAN (Mo-mad) account of the GOLDEN (idol) CALF made by Aaron saying MOOOOOoooo.
hehehe
inanimate CLAY BIRDS and COWS flying & talking! WOW.
Excellent vid. Very eloquent, articulate, easy to understand & follow, & most importantly- explained with common sense & educated language. May Allah bless & reward u.
ALLAH = SATAN arising from MOHAMMAD'S COPYING OF PAUL'S GOD OF THE WORLD -SATAN.
And to bulk up this his understanding of ALLAH as a DECEIVER (SATAN), Mohammad fabricated many verses depicting ALLAH as the BEST DECEIVER and went as far as to claim that it was ALLAH that plotted the? CRUXIFICATION of JESUS but alas, ALLAH the cunning DECEIVER replaced JESUS with whom? Allah's PLOT was incomplete, so ALLAH CAN'T be the BEST PLOTTER or BEST anything except BEST BLUNDERER.
True islam is a bunch of nut cases following the deeds and words of a crazed murdering child rapist.
these nutters called muslimes do not even understand the koran themselves as they can not read it all the translations of the koran are false and just made up garbage.
Faith in Islam is based on evidence. Evidence is the rule of the true belief. Allah says bring evidence to determine the truth. Quran has the evidence, who ever follow the Quran in on the right path, and Quran says follow the prophet (peace be upon him). And, sahee hadeeth is based on evidence.Sahee haeeth is acceptable because it is backed by evidence up to the first generation Muslms.
Did QURAN say he did not die but was made to appear so and was REALLY replaced by whom? Angel jibreel a.k.a.Dhiya?
And, I gather QURAN (i.e. Mo-mad) did not talk about his man years, he remained a baby reciting "I am the Messiah" and was playing with his doll clay birds and turning them into live birds?
Just like the QURAN (Mo-mad) account of the GOLDEN (idol) CALF made by Aaron saying MOOOOOoooo.
hehehe
inanimate CLAY BIRDS and COWS flying & talking! WOW.
tawheed is indeed most important but I advice anyone to call thyemselves moslimoen and not sunni or shia or hanafi so the sect whom we belong is islam and we must follow the sunnah sunnah meaning habbits like beard etc and hadieth set Allah first then the prophet muhammad (puh) and then our mother 3 times then our father and be good to all humankind and animals and nature also and spread the truth and inshallah only by the Grace of Allah 3azza wadjall may we inshallah enter djannah
@JESUSISLORD223 jesusislord whu cant you leave these people alone? why dear brother are you saying that jesus (puh) is lord? he worshipped God so he is a prophet we muslims believe he had a miracle birth no father but he had a mother he was you can say like adam (puh) he had no father or mother so why do you call jesus a God or son of God? please brother or sister repent and think logically may Allah lead you and your beloved ones to the straight path
@azadam1000 Jesus is Lord God Almighty not just a prophet, quran denies the diety crucifixion and ressurection of the Lord Jesus Christ this is blasphemy against Almighty God. Jesus died for the Whole Worlds sins and ressurected the third day proving he was God Almighty. Jesus is The ONLY way to heaven No One else can save you not your works not muhammad not allah but Jesus. He said you shall know the truth and the truth shall set you free. Please watch my videos and come to the Truth of God.
@JESUSISLORD223 do you have any brains left brother? at his time jesus (puh) was indeed the only way to the truth as was mozes (puh) etc jesus (puh) was only there for soecific period and specific people (childeren of israel) are you child of israel? islam is universal listen dude youre scriptures are curupted you still believe in bible of these days? really? as for blasphemy you are commiting it by setting partners to God jesus was a very mighty prophet(the miracles he did)
@JESUSISLORD223 although he had no political power he is a prophet a messenger he worshipped God , jesus was not worshipped he worshipped God for himself j. Jesus (puh) is not God , neither has God a son neither does God have a beginning or an end . Jesus is a creation nd God is the creator , muslims pray 5 times a day , washing themselves before and are perfect monotheists as for christiantity its man made and you dont have to worship just believe jesus died for your sinns REALLY? please dude
@JESUSISLORD223 whats wrong with you? why dont you worship the Creator why do you (worship) a creation? jesus (puh) was a mighty prophet he was a messenger . God cant walk on earth be logical brother , come on!!!!! jesus(puh) he ate he drank, he got tired , he could only perform miracles by the permission of Allah why do you deny the truth? the quran prooves itself to be revelation of God as it is preserved and respected and no errors also if you compare the signs in it with established science
@JESUSISLORD223 muslims who follow true path of islam actually have more belief in jesus(puh) they believe he was born miracelousely , he had only a mother and no father, just like adam had no father and mother!!! Allah is capable to do anything!!! why dont christians believe that only they who convert to islam do and there are many many many of them seeing finally the truth and you will not see people making fun of jesus in their cartoons or movies :-)
@azadam1000 Plain and simple your quran denies the diety crucifixion and ressurection of the Lord Jesus Christ which is blasphemy against Almighty God. Like I said allah was a false pagan moon god that was worshipped at the kabba along with 360 false idols allah is an idol God hates idols.Jesus is Lord muhammad was a false prophet rapist murderer and a pedophile (9 year old Aisha) he was decieved by SATAN in Mecca and Medina for 23 years and he is burning in hell for eternity for his blasphemy
@JESUSISLORD223 Jesus is Lord, allah was a false pagan moon god that was worshipped at the kabba along with 360 false idols even before muhammad was born. muhammad then took this false god and worshipped it as the cheif god. Your satanic quran denies the crucifixion ressurection and diety of the Lord Jesus Christ this is blasphemy against Almighty God. Phillipians 2:10 Every knee shall bow and every tounge will confess that Jesus Christ Is Lord. JESUS IS GOD not a mere prophet GOD ALMIGHTY
@azadam1000 Galations 1:8 For if we or AN ANGEL from heaven preach ANY OTHER gospel than the Gospel of Christ let him be ACCURSED. Muhammad recieved his revelation from an ANGEL who preached a FALSE Jesus. Quran claims Jesus was only a prophet which is BLASPHEMY Quran denies the Diety Crucifixion and Ressurection of the Lord Jesus Christ which is BLASPHEMY. Jesus is the ONLY way to heaven because he paid the full price for our sins. Righteous deeds cannot save you, ONLY JESUS WILL the true JESUS
looool astegfur allah this white boy take the deen from saudi gov shikhs lol who have nooooo towaheed anyway the go against the underrstanding of the 5 schools that allah has body and form and place and many more stuff the salafis say about allah that ALL shia and sunni say but wahabis/salafyah go against lol may allah show the white shiekh the truth about saudi gov and the lies the made about shia and the rest of the madaheeb
Then ask yourself why did Fatima Zehra (the daughter of the Prophet) die so young? Why were no one from the family of the Prophet or his tribe appointed to any position of power? Why was the son of the arch enemy of the Prophet Muwavia bin Abu Sufyaan given the power to govern Syria. Why did Husain bin Ali the grandson of the Prophet slaughtered by a Muslim army in broad day light in 61 AH (680AD). In 20:25 keep reading the Dua' of Moosa a.s. who asks Allah to appoint who for support?
its a long story so i put it this way: the shia/sunni are trying to say their sect is better (true Islam) than sunni/shia. both are trying to proof that the other is wrong. but of course both are wrong because Allah (swt) commanded all muslims not to divide Islam (Quran: 3:103, 6:159), our early muslim fathers failed and the childeren will follow their footsteps. anyone who calls himself anything other than ''muslim''>against the Quran>against Allah (swt)>high chance that he will see hell fire.
@jijdom You're right brother. But welcome to the world of humanity, human nature will always corrupt the true teachings of truth. Sadly. Satan/Iblis had most effect on dividing believers, in Christianity. insane amount of division there.
@7khani I don't care if you are a Christian of not. but instead of saying stupid things about Islam, take care of your own faith and stop attacking others faith.
shia is a coalition of jew apostate abdulla ben saba' and persian magian abu lolo also known fairooz magian who killed sydina umar bcoz of loving and patriotic to his fallen persian empire..look the shia rafidi worship and sujuud on abu lolo shrine in iran...they worship shrine and tomb...and their imaam almahdi will come to as saviour will kill all muslim sunnah and implement jew law TALMUD king DAVID & solomon law...this is DAjjaL the liar of all time..DAJJAL is rafidi syiah
the beauty of islam is actually..democracy concept and syura...ali was there during discussion to appoint amirul mukminin...since it was voted by syura council and memberss consist of all muhajirin and ansar in medina ..sydina ali never complain on the issue but the persian infidel and jews convert abdulla ben saba made up fitnah to create hatred/misunderstanding among muslim
Both are true in some points. Shia extremists are WRONG. They others say so too. But Sunni extremists are wrong, too. For example, Shia are correct in saying that Muhammad (SAW) should have have been succeeded by Ali (AS) and not Abu Bakar. Sunni are correct in saying that Al-Masih ad-Dajjal will be killed by Jesus.
Both are true in some points. Shia extremists are WRONG. They others say so too. But Sunni extremists are wrong, too. For example, Shia are correct in saying that Muhammad (SAW) should have have been succeeded by Ali (AS) and not Abu Bakar. Sunni are correct in saying that Al-Masih ad-Dajjal will be killed by Jesus.
@Converted2Islam how do i respond to shia when they try to justify from Sahih Bukhari about a hadeeth by Rasulullah (SAW) about 12 leaders who come after him.
Well ofcourse I don't want to be Shia! I just want to know what the meaning of the narration is according to mainstream Islam.
I never said imam ali was god. Astagfitallah. I said the Shia version of tahweed is so pure. YouTube imam alis description of God. No creation can be compared to Allah. I hate the misconceptions that some
@a4fkntrippen im so sorry brother i thought you were one of those people who say shias believe imam ali was god, i agree the description is so pure unlike the salafi description which attributes body parts to god, shia is true islam!
becasue from what i read it was just something someone asked because a sunni told them shias do this far as us doing it no we dont most shrines are seperate male and female so at the most you can do is half a circle secondly if you see shias doing it, it's not done like we do the kaba they are simply kept moving to get in and out the room but for arguments sake say we do circumulate does this mean we worship them of course not my prayer rug is right infront of my bed when i make sujood
@islamistruth101 soo on circulambulation i do not need to explain....so you accepted it.fine. great second) ahzab ayah 32-33 they are said to be ahulbayt by Allah...so its not upto you to deny..you do.you just said that too..im replying to you but if my answers are not what you expect that does not mean im not replying....to see if shiites lie you can also see my video...and its not hidden they lie everyone knows they do...do they dare curse sahaba infront of muslims...nop!! thats called lie.
@schehry circumulation i told you already we dont do it, wives are not part of ahulul bayt in the verse the begining part of the verse was reveled for the wives but the later part was reveled about a different wheres my evidence? The verse "Verily Allah intends to ... (33:33)" was revealed to the Prophet (PBUH&HF) in the house of Umm Salama. Upon that, the Prophet gathered Fatimah, al-Hasan, and al-Husain, and covered them with a cloak, and he also covered Ali who was behind him.
@islamistruth101 ok lets start at after tawaf(which is shirk offcourse and those who do are not monthiestic..which itself s suffecient..) and I have even seen with my eyes and heard with my ears shiites ask from aima(now plz dont say they dont cause you know they d0)
So we will discuss if aisha r.a and wivs were ahlulbayt or not
If you know arabic ahlulbayt means man and his wives and his children so your ahlulbayt will mean your wife and children...so its the first logic
@schehry okay you bring up too many topics at once so lets just discuss 33:33 then we will move on to anything of your choice, true ahlul bayt does mean wife and children but in a previous message i proved prophets have general ahlul bayt and chosen ahlul bayt, the wife of ibrahim was called ahlul bayt but go 2 verses before it and allah tells her she will give birth to 2 prophets Isaac and Jacob so she became ahlul bayt when she was going to be the mother of a prophet not because she was a wife
@islamistruth101 I can believe that ayah is not suffecient for a shiite becoz he does not derive his guidance from the koran but history and shiite hadiths.about the hadith she did not ask if she was ahlul bayt becoz its Allah Who has included her,she merely says am ialso with you? and the prophet says 'you are one good and virtue".if she did not even ask about being ahlelbayt why are shiite even quoting this..prophet also included Salman Farsi as household
@schehry Then the Prophet said: "O' Allah! These are the Members of my House (Ahlul-Bayt). Keep them away from every impurity and purify them with a perfect purification." Umm Salama (the wife of Prophet) asked: "Am I also included among them O Apostle of Allah?" the Prophet replied: "You remain in your position and you are toward a good ending." Sahih al-Tirmidhi, v5, pp 351,663 if the verse was about the wives then why these 5 were in the cloak and a wife was denied entrance if shes ahlul bayt
@islamistruth101 2) Wife of ibraham was called his alul bayt in the Quran..
the ahazab ayahas goes like this(32. O wives of the Prophet! You are not like any other women. If you keep you have Taqwa, then be not soft in speech, lest he in whose heart is a disease should be moved with desire, but speak in an honorable manner.)
@islamistruth101 (33. And stay in your houses, and do not Tabarruj yourselves like the Tabarruj of the times of ignorance, and perform the Salah, and give Zakah and obey Allah and His Messenger. Allah wishes only to remove the Ar-Rijs from you, O members of the family, and to purify you with a thorough purification.) (34. And remember, that which is recited in your houses of the Ayat of Allah and Al-Hikmah. Verily, Allah is Ever Most Courteous, Well-Acquainted with all things.)
@islamistruth101 where is the indication that they are not talking to the Wives.Allah is talkign about them..its crystal clear it does not need to be furthur explained....but daughter and her husband are not necessarily part of the family that is why that was sepcifically told that they are also ahlul bayt.
Ahlussunnah have various hadith in which Aisha was referred to as ahlulbayt by the propeht s.a.w.
@schehry then you asked where is the indication that allah is not talking about the wives well for starters the switch to feminine to masculine words, now you say the verse is clear meaning no need to look at the hadith this is an injustice to the quran which btw says that the prophet will explain the veses wether or not the verse is clear if there is a hadith about the verse it must be used in the interpretation, now i will give you an example of a verse that looks clear but is really not
@schehry surah 12:29 "O Joseph! pass this over and ask forgiveness for your sin, for truly you have been at fault." from reading the verse you will think that allah is telling joseph to ask for forgivness but if you look a any tafsir you will know allah is telling the wife of Aziz to ask for forgivness, then you contradicted yourself by saying a daughter is not necessarily ahlu bayt when earlier you said ahlul bayt means wife and children but anyways your argument is simple the prophet put ali
@islamistruth101 Also if the verse is using masculine gender then fatima would also be exluded..Masculine could also be used for both masclune and feminie gathering (becoz he had sons too)
Now plz tell me how can wives still be excluded if the verse uses masuline gender it would justr add people not subtract.I never said Ali and his ahl are not the ahl of prophet I accept it but his wives were also hi ah
@schehry fatima hassan and hussein under the cloak and recited this verse was to let them know they were ahlul bayt but there is a few problems with this interpretation first the according to sunnis its preconditional meaning the wives have some things to do if done allah will purify them so if thats the case there is no reason for the prophet to recite this verse on them in the cloak for it was only for the wives if he wanted to tell them that they were ahlul bayt he would have said it instead
@schehry of using this verse which was according to sunnis not about them if you wanna argue it was about both then you will have to explain what these 4 will have to do toget purified because the conditions before it are only to the wives not to them, another reason why this interpretation of letting them know they were ahlul bayt is false because why did the prophet only do it to these members why not Abbas and his family? Why not Aqeel and his family? and lastly why was umm salama denied
@islamistruth101 And I have never even heard this general and special ahlbayt by shiites?Its not even there?plz specify......also give me the reference of the hadith you mentioned about Aisha r.a. saying that no verse was revealed except for innocence becoz it may not be in our haidths or if it is it could also translate to "not revelad just about me/us" so i need to check! i do not see what is there in the verse that excludes wives from ahlbayt becoz its in continuation...its the same verse.
@schehry salam bro sorry for the late response ive been quite busy but instead of posting a bunch of comments im going to inbox you so we have unlimited writing space i will eaither send you a message tomorrow or the next day inshallah most likely tomorrow thanks for remaining patient may allah guide us all ameen
@islamistruth101 don't pm me...just reply to this point here...I have had enough of shiite people resorting to abusive language so plz nop I am not gonna do that with any shiite whosoever....do it here or don't do it.
@schehry brother I would never use abusive language, the quran says not to abuse the idols of the idol worshipers so why would i abuse a fellow muslim? I can assure you I would never, the reason for pm is so I dont have to post 5-7 comments at a time but if you still wont agree will you move this to my channel comments its not unlimited text but its enough where I will only need to post about 2 comments
@schehry entrance into the cloak if she was part of this ahlul bayt being mentioned the prophet would have allowed her in so why was she denied entrance? then you said you have hadiths about aisha being ahlu bayt but shias dont have a propblem with such hadiths becaise as i explained a prophet has general ahlul bayt and chosen yes aisha is of the general but not the chosen and then ahlul bayt in 33:33 is about the chosen ahlul bayt, heres my proof everyone's son is part of their family but in
@islamistruth101 In arabic it does not change to any gender it would just as well read you ahlulbayt...And I did not contradicted myself daughter is ahlulbayt but her busband and children are not.so that is why they were to be specified to be also included in the family....now verse is very clear so is the hadith.Quran only uses ahlbayt only 2 times and both times for the wives.....and from where do you derive that Ali and his family are special ahlbayt and Aisha r.a. and all wives are general?
@schehry surah 11:45-46 allah told nuh his son was not part of his family meaning he is not part of the ahlul bayt allah chose but of course his son is of his general ahlul bayt then you said Thats your shiite hadith not our hadith so im not gonna talk about that. im not sure what your refering to here please explain now if you still dont believe me that surah 33:33 is not about the wives maybe you will believe the mother of the believers aisha Bukhari, V6, #352 'Aisha said from behind a screen
@schehry , "Allah did not reveal anything from the Qur'an about us except what was connected with the declaration of my innocence (of the slander)." so even mother of the believers aisha testifies this verse was not about her so why do you argue the opposite? you brought up many topics so for now lets stick to 33:33 and we will move on from there
@schehry why was she denied? also why the switch from masculine to feminine? furthermore if the purification is preconditional as sunnis say then the conditions are set for the wives so why would these 4 be brought into the cloak for this verse? because if its preconditional the reward is only for the wives not them, far as shias lieing im asking you for textual proof you cant base shiaism on individuals so show me textual proof that lieing is a part of shiaism can you? i explained to you
@islamistruth101 You know what after I will give you textual proof you will say I dont belive n so and so book...its not that important to our faith etc let me just say that before i give you textual evidence.
@schehry already we do not curse we place lanat which is a dua, you said we dont do it infront of muslims implying that we are not muslims which we are, we do not do it in front of sunnis because we dont want to start fitnah its not a lie, further more when i asked for textual proof look at my video about abu bakr i use quran and sahih buhkari so i expect you to do the same use our sources which are quran and shia hadith
It's funny salafis are so quick to say the prophet (saw) who was the greatest creation made
Errors. But when you say thngs like umar denied the prophet a pen. Or the 3 never attended his funeral. Or Mawyia waged war agiast ali (as) who was the caliph at the time. You are a Shia kafir. Salafis make me laugh. It's a
Branch of zionism. Islam = love salafis have turned it into this backward religion.
@a4fkntrippen shia islam is not what shias do, this reminds me of the islamphobes in america always calling muslims terrorist for 9/11 and whatnot but they have no textual evidence when saying so meaning they cannot prove from the quran or hadith that acts of terrorism is aloud in islam likewise when making a claim such as ali is god lacks any textual evidence at all i mean look at our beliefs he is the first of our imams not god, and read nahjul balagha and tell me if you have that same thought
shiite imam are infallible---->incapable of any error(has knowledge of everything)---->imam is lower level than prophet--->yet propeht didn't know he was surrounded by munafiqeen---->prophet has less knowledge than shiite imam---->shiite islam contradictions
I do not consider them muslims cause they don't follow Quran..if they are even shown the verses they start beating around the bush....yeah and even their ayatush shaytaans lie.
@schehry No infalibility or in arabic masoom means they don't sin and it doesnt mean they cant sin they wouldnt sin, for example can u go outside naked yes would you? no, our imams do not have knowlege of everything far as khomeni saying this i have never read it but the book he quoted is online please show me where and even if he did khomeni is not someone who we derive our religion from only the quran prophet and ahlul bayt gives us our religion, thank you, asalamalaykum
@islamistruth101 shiite imams are infallible its an article of shiite faith if you still haven't read it you are not a shiite...don't talk about Quran the one who believes in Quran leaves shiism.I think you should read usul.
@schehry read carefully infallible is an english word the arabic for it is masoom i told you the meaning in my last message, if you want a shia scholar to tell you the meaning go here al-islam . org /shiism/ now for the quran imam ali in Nahjul balagha sermon 176 And know that this Qur'an is an adviser who never deceives, a leader who never misleads and a narrator who never speaks a lie. I think you need to do a little more research before you tell me about my religion or just ask about it.
@islamistruth101 i know what shiites do they lie they dont do this they dont do that but they do everything...they lie...so dont tell me.Curse anyone you want.
@schehry It's sad to see someone so blinded by your people I showed you from nahjul balagha one of the top shia books that we do believe in quran how did i lie? Don't you know it's haram to claim people to be liars, did allah not say bring your proof if ye be truthful, you want to declare shias kafir atleast bring some proof to the table, also why did you bring cursing into this?
@islamistruth101 Becoz shiias cruse Aisha r.a.,abu bakr ,umar and uthman.even though Quran speaks good about them. They even say Aisha r.a. is not ummul mumineen..even though Quran says she is....They say she is not ahlelbayt even though Quran says it. they say curse be on abu bakr and Quran speaks good about him.
Yup and nomral shiite person even circumambulate around their imam's shrines (shiachat(.)com) and they debate its correct.
@schehry far as cursing goes its not aloud in shia islam what shias do is lanat which is a dua asking allah to remove his mercy from such individuals, now aisha was condemd by allah in surah 66 and far as umar abu bakr and uthman show me a verse that praises them and dont give me a verse that praises companions in general because allah says there are hypocrites, as far mothers of the believers go shias dont deny that she is, the verse doesnt mean it the way u think it does it means they cannot
@schehry be remarried in case of divorce or widowed That is why we read in the Quran: Nor is it right for you that ye should annoy Allah's Messenger, or that ye should marry his widows after him at any time. (33:53) also in Tafsir al-Qurtubi, Volume 14 page 228:Qatada said: ‘A man said: ‘If Allah's messenger (s) died, I would marry Ayesha’. Hence Allah revealed ‘{ Nor is it right for you that ye should annoy Allah's Messenger}’ then revealed ‘{ and his wives are their mothers}’.
@schehry the quran does not say she is ahlul bayt and shias say a prophet has two types of ahul bayt there are general and chosen general is all family members however chosen refers to thse whom allah chose this is supported in the quran by 11:45-46 noah said surely my son is apart of my family but allah said that hes not, everyones son is part of their ahlul bayt but not a prophets chosen ahlul bayt. far shias circumambulate around shrines maybe you should have read shia chat more carefully
@schehry does it mean im worshiping my bed of course not also i would like for you to show me in shia literature a hadith from eaither the prophet or the imams saying this is part of shia islam if you can not then you have no argument now please so i dont have to post so many comments stick to one of these topics at a time btw watch my video on abu bakr its about 4 minutes and you will see him condemed in the quran and also you never showed me that shias lie.
@schehry infallible means their actions are correct in context of them being an example. like the prophet was infallible. infallible doesnt mean all knowing. how are u going to teach about something u know nothing about.
@schehry infallible means their actions are correct in context of them being an example. like the prophet was infallible. infallible doesnt mean all knowing. how are u going to teach about something u know nothing about.
Many other commentaries also hold that this verse refers to Imam Ali including: Sunan al-Nisa΄i, Tafsir al-Kabir by Tha΄alibi, Musnad Ahmad ibn Hanbal,
Zamakhshari, Tafsir al-Kashif (See interpretation of ch. 5 v. 55
Wahidi, Asbab al-Nuzul, (See interpretation of ch. 5 v. 5
Verily Your Guardian can be only Allah; and His messenger and those who believe, who establish worship and pay the poordue (Zakah) in Ruku. (5:55)
al-Wahidi in his book on the commentary of the Quran entitled, Asbab al-Nuzul, cites Kalbi's narration, that the cause of this revelation was Imam Ali. Kalbi says, “The later part of this verse is in favor of Ali ibn Abi Talib (may Allah be gracious to him) because he gave his ring to a beggar while in the state of ruku during the prayers.”
Amirul muminin says 'I would have cast the rope of Caliphate on its own shoulders'
Ali is likening the decisions on which caliphate was distributed with a camel whose rein has been cast on its shoulders and and goes about randomly whereever it wants.There was no Quran based principle or criteria whatsoever which could support the three previous caliphates
Allah with the learned to the effect that they should not acquiesce in the gluttony of the oppressor and the hunger of the oppressed I would have cast the rope of Caliphate on its own shoulders, and would have given the last one the same treatment as to the first one. Then you would have seen that in my view this world of yours is no better than the sneezing of a goat.
This is extract from Sermon 3 of Ali A.S. also called ash-Shiqshiqiyyah regarding the caliphate
Yes, by Allah, they had heard it and understood it (Ali referring to Al Quran 28:83 mentioned in previous paragraph of sermon)but the world appeared glittering in their eyes and its embellishments seduced them. Behold, by Him who split the grain (to grow) and created living beings, if people had not come to me and supporters had not exhausted the argument (Hujjat)and if there had been no pledge of
Im sure Ayatollah didnt imply control of the grains of sand by the Imams as a sign of Godship, i think he implied it the same way as Solomon had control over the worlds or any of the miracles done by the prophets peace be on them all. I say this because even though they did all these things that amazed everyone it was not done with their own will but by the will of Allah
and even in your books there is a hadish that sayd profet muhammad said hussain is mine and im hussains then how can you show respect for a man who killed the third imam who profet loved him to deat, one of the companion of profet said once i saw the profet muammad is crying i asked him why and the profet said theye gonna kill my son somwere named karbala
your a kafir idiot, you guys i don't know what to say, like aisha told the womans to give theyre brest to the men's they don't even know, like omar changed the muta even profet muhammad sallalah can't chant change the word of allah how can a idiot like omar change it who even couldn't pray perfectly so tell me how can he be the true khalifa of all the muslims when he don't even know how to pray or how to red the quran,
you have been a muslim in like one day and come here and learn us somethign that you don't even know what it is, dude the prophet muhammad himself took ali's hand infront of 40 000 people and said menkonto mowla wa haza alion mowla, and somewere in your book sahih muslim sahih bukhari i read that muhammad said my ahle bait is like the profet nooh's boat if you get in it you will be safe if you don't you will drown like all kuffar did
as of Moses we do know Haron was his deputy .he was enforcer of Torah so he was both messenger and Imam.the Holy Prophet PBUH has referred to this in his famous Hadith meaning Ali is similar to him as haroon was to Musa
regarding the Imamate questions you raised ,Ayatollahs are not masoomeen so they can't be Imams and Imamte runs in the family of Rusul only.Ayatollahs can only be Deputies of Imams.the main reason for Imamate position is to continue to implement Sharia and Keep Hujjat Of Allah on People.
as of Moses and Jesus being Rusul they didn't need imamate for themselves.Jesus had no childern and whoever deputised him made a mess of shariah and Bible and thus carried out zulm.
Muawiyah bought the idea of late as the outcome of Jamal favoured Ali.Faced with threat of removal he then banked on this allegation to implicate Ali .he would have been at peace had Ali Not removed him but Ali couldn't stand his corruption and Muawiyah was not to abandon Emirate without fight.
the sermon unambiguously puts the blame of these people who first incited the killing and then demanded Qisas despited being implicit in killing that's what Ali was referring to when he said 'They are demanding of me a right which they have abandoned, and a blood that they have themselves shed'
this will expose you lies regarding the killing of uthman by so called sabiite shites? perhaps you were trying to assert the theory that shias were invented by ibn e saba and how interesting you found them in 35 AH?during the life of Ali?would Ali have allowed them to thrive in his name?
However unfortunate but these 3 great people of Islam including Ummal mominin had a direct role in organising and inciting the agitations which resulted in mob attack and ended in this sad event.
al-Mughirah ibn Shu`bah came to `A'ishah when she said, "O' Abu `Abdillah, I wish you had been with me on the day of Jamal; how arrows were piercing through my hawdaj (camel litter) till some of them stuck my body." al- Mughirah said, "I wish one of them should have killed you." She said, "Allah may have pity you; why so?" He replied, "So that it would have been some atonement for what you had done against `Uthman." (al-`Iqd al-farid, vol. 4, p. 294)
Historians have also state that az-Zubayr used to say "Kill `Uthman. He has altered your faith." People said, "Your son is standing at his door and guarding him," and he replied, "Even my son may be lost, but `Uthman must be killed. `Uthman will be lying like a carcass on Sirat tomorrow." (Sharh Nahj al-balaghah, vol.9, pp. 35-36)
How disappointing is this challenger (to battle)? Who is this challenger and for what is he being responded to? I am happy that the reasoning of Allah has been exhausted before them and He knows (all) about them.
Ibn Abi'l-Hadid writes that:
Those who have written the account of assassination of `Uthman state that on the day of his killing Talhah's condition was that in order to obscure himself from the eyes of the people he had a veil on his face
They are demanding of me a right which they have abandoned, and a blood that they have themselves shed.(1) If I were a partner with them in it then they too have their share of it. But if they did it without me they alone have to face the consequences. Their biggest argument (against me) is (really) against themselves. They are suckling from a mother who is already dry, and bringing into life innovation that is already dead.
This is what Amir ul Mominin has to say about the allegation of killing of Usman
sermon 22
Beware! Satan has certainly started instigating his forces and has collected his army in order that oppression may reach its extreme ends and wrong may come back to its position. By Allah they have not put a correct blame on me, nor have they done justice between me and themselves.
I've given you the reference from 13 books on account of Hujr bin Adi's killing and i didn't claim any of references was from sahihayn.but tons of sunni history books refer to this incident.these are the reliable sources of history at that time and you wouldn't believe in them?
do you think none of these historians quoted from reliable sources really?
How does anyone say RA after Muawiyahs name! Nauzubillah
Musnad Ahmad Ibn Hanbal 6 p33
Whoever curses Ali, then he has cursed me, and whoever has cursed me, then he has cursed Allah (SWT), and whoever has cursed Allah (SWT), then Allah (SWT) will throw him into the hellfire.
Typical Nawasib Thinking.In order to defend Muawiyya you implicated Amir ul mominin in Uthman's Murder ,that he was harboring the culprits.you know better that it was mob attack and had Muawiyya presented evidence there was no one more judicious than Amir ul Mominin
so did Muawiyya apprehend culprits when he came into power?
don't you think it was only a political gimmick and when he took control the question of Uthman killing was totally forgotton
@yasirabbas1 You didn't answer the question, like thousand other question I have asked you. You are calling me a nasabi and change the subject again. If some extremists from shiat Muawiyya killed caliph Ali (ra) and Muawiyya (ra) became caliph but rejected that he was related to the killing Ali (ra). Would you shias believe Muawiyya (ra) like we sunnis are 100% sure Ali (ra) didn't have anything at all to do with the killing of Uthman (ra)!?!
cut it off plp .the Ahlo Al Bayet are known except ,the arrogant ignorant jealous ones deny their rights..
no others nations before you have done so..every people of the book have respected and understood the Ahlo AL bayet of Jacob and Ishaq
except this sect of sick haters ..let me give you a news that you should keep inn heart by Allah's Name ,you are dying in the state of ignorant and rejection ..Prophet sw will deny you as you've denied his rights through his kinship ..die as a jew or christ
We sunni can give proof of our faith in islam salah sawm kalima zakah hajj.....can shia do same of their faith by explaining thru quran imamate maatam muta???
@yasirabbas1 Thank you very much, but you didn't do what I said. I don't have those books so show me the text that says Muawiyya (ra) killed them >because they refused to curse Ali (ra)<.
Ahadeth maaan? look prophet sw indeed talked about it and profecized about و قال لعلي و لابناء علي ستقتلك الفئة الباغية
قاتلك شقي في النار
الخ...
whether he ordered or it was your advocacy ..maaan look let's just turn off this scene you do what you can in order to rebuild islam ..if u can ......Assalamu Alaykum
you're not that bright are you.i told you again and again this verse is only related to imamate and the verse confirms the Imamate continued in holy Prophet's progency ,period.No ayatollah claimed to be one of 12 imams and besides there are different levels of Adl as well .Sure no ayatollah has level of Adl Imams possess and they are NOT included in convenent as this covenent only pertains to imamate and nothing else
@yasirabbas1 Try just to thin logical. If you think about your argument, than ayatollahs are the zalimun and the rest of Umma except of 12 imams, because otherwise we would also be able to be leaders. My point is that the verse doesn't say people has to be masum to be leaders, but they can't be wrong-doers.
Weren't Musa (as) and Isa (as) descends from Ibrahim (as)? Do shias believe they were amongst the zalimin because they weren't imams? Subhanallah, your interpretaion doesnt make sence
what argument you have for killing of Hujr Bin Adi who was only martyred by Muawiyya for Not Cursing Ali A.S. alongwith his other 6 companions including his own son? What argument you have for Muawiyya Declaring Bastard Ziyad his brother?
the Bastard referred to In Imam Hussain's famous quote
Innad Daee (Ubaidullah Ibn e Ziyad) Ibn ad Daee (Ziyad the bastard) Qad Rakazanee Baina isnatain Bain as sillat e wa zzilla wa Haihaat Minaz zilla
@yasirabbas1 you're welcome to show me the reliable sunni ahadith that say Muawiyya (ra) ordered them to be killed because they refused to curse Imam Ali (ra). And don't just show me the references but also the texts. Remember, the ahadith should include the part which says Muawiyya (ra) killed them because they refused to curse Ali (ra).
as far as killing of Imam Nasai is concerned you're lying again.you better know kharjis were against Muawiyya as well and they could no way have killed Nasai for not quoting Hadith in honour of Muawiyya or the one mentioned in the reference.these were sunnin ulema of syria who killed their own scholar for compiling 'Khsais e Ali' and do you know were he asked to be buried (and is buried)? between Safa and Marwa which overlooks Mohallah Bani Hashim where Rasulullah and Ali A.S. walked
@yasirabbas1 You're the liar, because you're accusing sunnis for killing Imam Nasa'i. What a grave mistake and it's very disgusting. You think sunni ulema would kill a person who wants to make a book about sayyiduna Ali (ra) and because they couldn't accept Ali (ra) has a higher rank? lol. Sayyiduna Muawiyya (ra) himself said that Ali (ra) was better than him! You could prove that it was sunni ulema, although you sounded so sure.
the verse quoted is clearly for comparison of families of Ibrahim A.S. and Rasulullah SAW (and Allah has mentioned several times the families of Prophets with continuation of prophethood in their families) and is strictly confined to the Imamate .every Imam is infallible and is essentially Adil as well therefore they are all Aaimma tul Huda appointed by God.The ayatollahs and marajay are not discussed in this verse.This verse is only for Imamate and you don't include muminin in it.
@yasirabbas1 You claim that Allah doesn't include anyone who isn't infallible in his covenant, which according to your logic means everybody who isn't infallible is zalimun. So according to your logic your own ayatollahs and past scholars all are amongst the zalimin because they aren't infallible. If you deny then they could also be leaders.
According to sunnis the verse say Allah doesn't include the wrong-doers/sinners/unjust in his covenant. He only includes the good-doers/just/righteous.
Sunni Islam is the pure Islamic teachings
Iran is not Islamic cause it's shia country
Shia is a persian Turkish cult to destroy Islam
AlAinJinn 1 week ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@4islam3
WHO the FUCKING HELL told you that JESUS did not die?
The same BLUNDERING Mohammad QURAN that claimed Marian (Moses and Aaron sister) is the Mother of JESUS
and that proclaimed that
GOD of this WORLD (SATAN) is ALLAH (2Cor 4;4, QURAN 6:045)?
And that also SPOKE and PRAISED 3 she gods and kissed an idol STONE and advised you that you can FUCK angels in HEAVEN?
You are a BIGGER WANKER that Mohammad.
7khani 1 week ago
This has been flagged as spam show
5
Marian (Aaron sister) = JESUS Mum = QURAN error
QURAN 19: 27 - 28;
At length she brought the babe to her people, carrying him in her arms.
They said : "O Mary! Truly an amazing thing hast thou brought!
O sister of Aaron (Harun)!
Thy father was not a man of evil nor thy mother a woman unchaste!"
Sahih Muslim 5326- Mughira b. Shuba reported:
When I came to Najran, the Christians asked me:
you read "O sister of Aaron (Harun) in the QURAN, whereas Aaron was born much before Jesus"
7khani 1 week ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@BOOooMO
MOHAMMAD is not a SPIRIT. I agree he was possessed by a SPIRIT DEMON as he himself CONFESSED.
He also CONFIRMED his DEMON POSSESSION by uttering MESSAGES from SATAN.
What EVER ELSE do you want the poor TORMENTED man to do or say before you ACCEPT he was from SATAN?
Resurrect with 2 DEVIL horns and say Booooooooo to you?
7khani 1 week ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@CopyMad
hehehe
copy cat copy cat, what are you copying?
I am COPYING Paul and getting confused.
what does PAUL mean by GOD of the WORLDS who deceives and BLINDS people Could that be really the same God these Jews talk about?
Anyway as it is their VERY BEST SCHOLAR that wrote it it must be true.
hehehe- I have discovered another NAME of ALLAH and will build it up in QURAN.
QURAN -Praise be to ALLAH, the Lord of the WORLDS (6:45)
2 COR4:4 GOD of the WORLD = SATAN
ALLAH = SATAN
7khani 1 week ago
Comment removed
7khani 1 week ago
This has been flagged as spam show
COPY-CAT Mohammad COPIED PAUL
hehehe
Mohammad COPIED PAUL == The Secret MUSLIMS have being trying to HIDE.
Mohammad COPIED PAUL
I have FOUND The REASON why Muslims Vilify PAUL
It is to distract us/ prevent us from reading / quoting PAUL with regards to PAUL’s writings STOLEN by Mohammad.
Mohammad COPIED PAUL
Mohammad COPIED PAUL
READ all about it in my Short Assay titled “PAUL Crucified MOHAMMAD” -P1 - 4 below:
7khani 1 week ago
This has been flagged as spam show
PAUL Cruxified MOHAMMAD
P1
EVERYONE, God is Great.
When I was quoting Quran 6:45 and 2Cor4:4 to PROVE that Allah is The LORD of the WORLDS and so SATAN, I did not realise that in fact 2Cor 4:4 is the same passage COPIED by Mohammad in that Quran verse.
Compare 2Cor4:4 with these two Quran verses and find proof that Mohammad copied the NEW TESTAMENT PAUL and was IGNORANT that the rest of the Bible (especially PAUL) uses this phrase “GOD of this WORLD” as another name for SATAN.
7khani 1 week ago
This has been flagged as spam show
P2
Bible 2Corinthians 4 :
.
3 But if our gospel be hid, it is hid to them that are lost:
.
4 In whom “the god of this world hath blinded the minds of them” which believe not, lest the light of the glorious gospel of Christ, who is the image of God, should shine unto them.
.
7khani 1 week ago
This has been flagged as spam show
P3
.
QURAN 6 : 045:
Praise be to Allah -The LORD of The WORLDS.
.
Quran 2:6-7
' As to those who reject Faith, it is the same to them whether thou warn them or do not WARN THEM; they will not believe - ALLAH hath set a SEAL on their hearts and on their hearing, and on their eyes is a viel; GREAT is the PENALTY they (incur ). '
7khani 1 week ago
This has been flagged as spam show
P4
Mohammad read GOD of this world in 2Cor4:4 and assumed that the GOD mentioned there meant the TRUE GOD.
This is another GREAT irrefutable PROOF that Mohammad copied the Bible but with no INSPIRATION from God. Thus his INSPIRATION is of the DEMON, who possessed him on their 1st ENCOUNTER.
BUT MOST IMPORTANTLY, the greatest verse used by MUSLIMS to try to PROVE to us we are blinded by God (ALLAH) and are of the DEVIL is PAUL’s WRITING about people like MUSLIMS blinded by SATAN not God.
.
7khani 1 week ago
(A)
Everyone also note; my discuss ABOVE also proves that;
(1) the Bible read by Mohammad is the same Bible we have TODAY.
(2) as Mohammad COPIED Paul in 2Corinthians 4, he must have understood that the FAITH talked about is "The Glorious Gospel of Christ". However, he left this out but instead put FAITH which MUSLIMS and MOHAMMAD take to be ISLAM.
(3) Therefore the FAITH Islam = Anti-Christ Gospel = Anti-Christ.
7khani 1 week ago
This has been flagged as spam show
(B)
The STOLEN writings of PAUL by Mohammad CONFIRMS 100% that Mohammad understood the GOSPELS but rejected it and REPLACED it with ISLAM - a new GOSPEL = a new FAITH.
So, while we were correct all along in identifying ISLAM as Anti-Christ, 2 Corinthians chapter 4 proves it beyond any SHADOW of DOUBT.
MOHAMMAD copied PAUL writings and TWISTED Paul's GOSPEL of CHRIST into GOSPEL of ISLAM.
7khani 1 week ago
(C)
So the whole QURAN - the Majestic NOBLE QURAN that CANNOT be challenged? is in fact PAUL's "QURAN".
It is in FACT Paul that CANNOT be Challenged.
hehehe
hohoho
HAHAHA
7khani 1 week ago
@MOOooMad
heheehehe
Did QURAN say he did not die but was made to appear so and was REALLY replaced by whom? Angel jibreel a.k.a.Dhiya?
And, I gather QURAN (i.e. Mo-mad) did not talk about his man years, he remained a baby reciting "I am the Messiah" and was playing with his doll clay birds and turning them into live birds?
Just like the QURAN (Mo-mad) account of the GOLDEN (idol) CALF made by Aaron saying MOOOOOoooo.
hehehe
inanimate CLAY BIRDS and COWS flying & talking! WOW.
7khani 1 week ago
feel sorry for that idiots kids
aldismews 2 weeks ago
Excellent vid. Very eloquent, articulate, easy to understand & follow, & most importantly- explained with common sense & educated language. May Allah bless & reward u.
DebaterTron 2 weeks ago
@DebaterTron
ALLAH = SATAN arising from MOHAMMAD'S COPYING OF PAUL'S GOD OF THE WORLD -SATAN.
And to bulk up this his understanding of ALLAH as a DECEIVER (SATAN), Mohammad fabricated many verses depicting ALLAH as the BEST DECEIVER and went as far as to claim that it was ALLAH that plotted the? CRUXIFICATION of JESUS but alas, ALLAH the cunning DECEIVER replaced JESUS with whom? Allah's PLOT was incomplete, so ALLAH CAN'T be the BEST PLOTTER or BEST anything except BEST BLUNDERER.
7khani 1 week ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@MUSLIMfools
Illiterate BUFFOONS like MOHAMMAD.
That's why MOHAMMAD copied PAUL and mis-interpreted "GOD of The WORLD" -SATAN as ALLAH.
The whole QURAN and ISLAM is BASED ON THIS COPY-CAT ERROR.
IDIOTS, calling God SATAN and a DECEIVER - all arising from MOHAMMAD'S COPYING of PAUL.
How can an illiterate BUFFOON copy the BEST LITERATE SCHOLAR without making an EARTHQUAKE BLUNDER?
THE BLUNDER is ISLAM.
7khani 1 week ago
True islam is a bunch of nut cases following the deeds and words of a crazed murdering child rapist.
these nutters called muslimes do not even understand the koran themselves as they can not read it all the translations of the koran are false and just made up garbage.
philipofportugal 3 weeks ago
Faith in Islam is based on evidence. Evidence is the rule of the true belief. Allah says bring evidence to determine the truth. Quran has the evidence, who ever follow the Quran in on the right path, and Quran says follow the prophet (peace be upon him). And, sahee hadeeth is based on evidence.Sahee haeeth is acceptable because it is backed by evidence up to the first generation Muslms.
alfatourist 3 weeks ago
@alfatourist
@MOOooMad
heheehehe
Did QURAN say he did not die but was made to appear so and was REALLY replaced by whom? Angel jibreel a.k.a.Dhiya?
And, I gather QURAN (i.e. Mo-mad) did not talk about his man years, he remained a baby reciting "I am the Messiah" and was playing with his doll clay birds and turning them into live birds?
Just like the QURAN (Mo-mad) account of the GOLDEN (idol) CALF made by Aaron saying MOOOOOoooo.
hehehe
inanimate CLAY BIRDS and COWS flying & talking! WOW.
7khani 1 week ago
@alfatourist
hehehe
copy cat copy cat, what are you copying?
I am COPYING Paul and getting confused.
what does PAUL mean by GOD of the WORLDS who deceives and BLINDS people? Could that be really the same God these Jews talk about?
Anyway as it is their VERY BEST SCHOLAR that wrote it it must be true.
hehehe- I have discovered another NAME of ALLAH and will build it up in QURAN.
QURAN -Praise be to ALLAH, the Lord of the WORLDS (6:45)
2 COR4:4 GOD of the WORLD = SATAN
ALLAH = SATAN
7khani 1 week ago
tawheed is indeed most important but I advice anyone to call thyemselves moslimoen and not sunni or shia or hanafi so the sect whom we belong is islam and we must follow the sunnah sunnah meaning habbits like beard etc and hadieth set Allah first then the prophet muhammad (puh) and then our mother 3 times then our father and be good to all humankind and animals and nature also and spread the truth and inshallah only by the Grace of Allah 3azza wadjall may we inshallah enter djannah
azadam1000 3 weeks ago
CONVERTED2ISLAM PLEASE WATCH MY VIDEOS AS WELL AS MUSLIMS AND RESPOND
JESUSISLORD223 3 weeks ago
@JESUSISLORD223 jesusislord whu cant you leave these people alone? why dear brother are you saying that jesus (puh) is lord? he worshipped God so he is a prophet we muslims believe he had a miracle birth no father but he had a mother he was you can say like adam (puh) he had no father or mother so why do you call jesus a God or son of God? please brother or sister repent and think logically may Allah lead you and your beloved ones to the straight path
azadam1000 3 weeks ago
@azadam1000 Jesus is Lord God Almighty not just a prophet, quran denies the diety crucifixion and ressurection of the Lord Jesus Christ this is blasphemy against Almighty God. Jesus died for the Whole Worlds sins and ressurected the third day proving he was God Almighty. Jesus is The ONLY way to heaven No One else can save you not your works not muhammad not allah but Jesus. He said you shall know the truth and the truth shall set you free. Please watch my videos and come to the Truth of God.
JESUSISLORD223 3 weeks ago
@JESUSISLORD223 do you have any brains left brother? at his time jesus (puh) was indeed the only way to the truth as was mozes (puh) etc jesus (puh) was only there for soecific period and specific people (childeren of israel) are you child of israel? islam is universal listen dude youre scriptures are curupted you still believe in bible of these days? really? as for blasphemy you are commiting it by setting partners to God jesus was a very mighty prophet(the miracles he did)
azadam1000 3 weeks ago
@JESUSISLORD223 although he had no political power he is a prophet a messenger he worshipped God , jesus was not worshipped he worshipped God for himself j. Jesus (puh) is not God , neither has God a son neither does God have a beginning or an end . Jesus is a creation nd God is the creator , muslims pray 5 times a day , washing themselves before and are perfect monotheists as for christiantity its man made and you dont have to worship just believe jesus died for your sinns REALLY? please dude
azadam1000 3 weeks ago
@JESUSISLORD223 whats wrong with you? why dont you worship the Creator why do you (worship) a creation? jesus (puh) was a mighty prophet he was a messenger . God cant walk on earth be logical brother , come on!!!!! jesus(puh) he ate he drank, he got tired , he could only perform miracles by the permission of Allah why do you deny the truth? the quran prooves itself to be revelation of God as it is preserved and respected and no errors also if you compare the signs in it with established science
azadam1000 3 weeks ago
@JESUSISLORD223 muslims who follow true path of islam actually have more belief in jesus(puh) they believe he was born miracelousely , he had only a mother and no father, just like adam had no father and mother!!! Allah is capable to do anything!!! why dont christians believe that only they who convert to islam do and there are many many many of them seeing finally the truth and you will not see people making fun of jesus in their cartoons or movies :-)
azadam1000 3 weeks ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@azadam1000 Plain and simple your quran denies the diety crucifixion and ressurection of the Lord Jesus Christ which is blasphemy against Almighty God. Like I said allah was a false pagan moon god that was worshipped at the kabba along with 360 false idols allah is an idol God hates idols.Jesus is Lord muhammad was a false prophet rapist murderer and a pedophile (9 year old Aisha) he was decieved by SATAN in Mecca and Medina for 23 years and he is burning in hell for eternity for his blasphemy
JESUSISLORD223 3 weeks ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@JESUSISLORD223 Jesus is Lord, allah was a false pagan moon god that was worshipped at the kabba along with 360 false idols even before muhammad was born. muhammad then took this false god and worshipped it as the cheif god. Your satanic quran denies the crucifixion ressurection and diety of the Lord Jesus Christ this is blasphemy against Almighty God. Phillipians 2:10 Every knee shall bow and every tounge will confess that Jesus Christ Is Lord. JESUS IS GOD not a mere prophet GOD ALMIGHTY
JESUSISLORD223 3 weeks ago
Comment removed
JESUSISLORD223 3 weeks ago
@azadam1000 Galations 1:8 For if we or AN ANGEL from heaven preach ANY OTHER gospel than the Gospel of Christ let him be ACCURSED. Muhammad recieved his revelation from an ANGEL who preached a FALSE Jesus. Quran claims Jesus was only a prophet which is BLASPHEMY Quran denies the Diety Crucifixion and Ressurection of the Lord Jesus Christ which is BLASPHEMY. Jesus is the ONLY way to heaven because he paid the full price for our sins. Righteous deeds cannot save you, ONLY JESUS WILL the true JESUS
JESUSISLORD223 3 weeks ago
looool astegfur allah this white boy take the deen from saudi gov shikhs lol who have nooooo towaheed anyway the go against the underrstanding of the 5 schools that allah has body and form and place and many more stuff the salafis say about allah that ALL shia and sunni say but wahabis/salafyah go against lol may allah show the white shiekh the truth about saudi gov and the lies the made about shia and the rest of the madaheeb
Alsayedmustaffa 4 weeks ago
Then ask yourself why did Fatima Zehra (the daughter of the Prophet) die so young? Why were no one from the family of the Prophet or his tribe appointed to any position of power? Why was the son of the arch enemy of the Prophet Muwavia bin Abu Sufyaan given the power to govern Syria. Why did Husain bin Ali the grandson of the Prophet slaughtered by a Muslim army in broad day light in 61 AH (680AD). In 20:25 keep reading the Dua' of Moosa a.s. who asks Allah to appoint who for support?
meyou222222 4 weeks ago
This guy is just bursting with noor, mashallah.
DarthP90 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
its a long story so i put it this way: the shia/sunni are trying to say their sect is better (true Islam) than sunni/shia. both are trying to proof that the other is wrong. but of course both are wrong because Allah (swt) commanded all muslims not to divide Islam (Quran: 3:103, 6:159), our early muslim fathers failed and the childeren will follow their footsteps. anyone who calls himself anything other than ''muslim''>against the Quran>against Allah (swt)>high chance that he will see hell fire.
jijdom 1 month ago
@jijdom You're right brother. But welcome to the world of humanity, human nature will always corrupt the true teachings of truth. Sadly. Satan/Iblis had most effect on dividing believers, in Christianity. insane amount of division there.
Blake4014 3 weeks ago
@alfatourist
hehehheheh
PAUL wrote QURAN
Mohammad COPIED Paul
PAUL is the REVERSE Author of QURAN
Without PAUL, there would be no QURAN
no "i challenge you to present a similar SURA"
The whole SURA of QURAN are PAULS
Hehehhehehehehe
7khani 1 week ago
@7khani I don't care if you are a Christian of not. but instead of saying stupid things about Islam, take care of your own faith and stop attacking others faith.
roseandsakura 6 days ago in playlist My Views on Islam
shia is a coalition of jew apostate abdulla ben saba' and persian magian abu lolo also known fairooz magian who killed sydina umar bcoz of loving and patriotic to his fallen persian empire..look the shia rafidi worship and sujuud on abu lolo shrine in iran...they worship shrine and tomb...and their imaam almahdi will come to as saviour will kill all muslim sunnah and implement jew law TALMUD king DAVID & solomon law...this is DAjjaL the liar of all time..DAJJAL is rafidi syiah
aidil389 1 month ago 4
the beauty of islam is actually..democracy concept and syura...ali was there during discussion to appoint amirul mukminin...since it was voted by syura council and memberss consist of all muhajirin and ansar in medina ..sydina ali never complain on the issue but the persian infidel and jews convert abdulla ben saba made up fitnah to create hatred/misunderstanding among muslim
aidil389 1 month ago
Mashallah Brother Wonderful Answers!! May Allah reward your dedication :)
aMiNaB3LLA 1 month ago
And yes, the extremists make Imams greater (almost) than Prophets. (IT'S WRONG)
TheBestttesttt 1 month ago 3
This has been flagged as spam show
Both are true in some points. Shia extremists are WRONG. They others say so too. But Sunni extremists are wrong, too. For example, Shia are correct in saying that Muhammad (SAW) should have have been succeeded by Ali (AS) and not Abu Bakar. Sunni are correct in saying that Al-Masih ad-Dajjal will be killed by Jesus.
TheBestttesttt 1 month ago
Both are true in some points. Shia extremists are WRONG. They others say so too. But Sunni extremists are wrong, too. For example, Shia are correct in saying that Muhammad (SAW) should have have been succeeded by Ali (AS) and not Abu Bakar. Sunni are correct in saying that Al-Masih ad-Dajjal will be killed by Jesus.
TheBestttesttt 1 month ago
@TheBestttesttt the shia saying is not correct..xD
Dengkaidou 1 month ago
@Converted2Islam how do i respond to shia when they try to justify from Sahih Bukhari about a hadeeth by Rasulullah (SAW) about 12 leaders who come after him.
Well ofcourse I don't want to be Shia! I just want to know what the meaning of the narration is according to mainstream Islam.
manray254 1 month ago
I never said imam ali was god. Astagfitallah. I said the Shia version of tahweed is so pure. YouTube imam alis description of God. No creation can be compared to Allah. I hate the misconceptions that some
People have of Shia it's pure ignorence
a4fkntrippen 1 month ago
@a4fkntrippen im so sorry brother i thought you were one of those people who say shias believe imam ali was god, i agree the description is so pure unlike the salafi description which attributes body parts to god, shia is true islam!
islamistruth101 1 month ago
becasue from what i read it was just something someone asked because a sunni told them shias do this far as us doing it no we dont most shrines are seperate male and female so at the most you can do is half a circle secondly if you see shias doing it, it's not done like we do the kaba they are simply kept moving to get in and out the room but for arguments sake say we do circumulate does this mean we worship them of course not my prayer rug is right infront of my bed when i make sujood
islamistruth101 1 month ago
@islamistruth101 soo on circulambulation i do not need to explain....so you accepted it.fine. great second) ahzab ayah 32-33 they are said to be ahulbayt by Allah...so its not upto you to deny..you do.you just said that too..im replying to you but if my answers are not what you expect that does not mean im not replying....to see if shiites lie you can also see my video...and its not hidden they lie everyone knows they do...do they dare curse sahaba infront of muslims...nop!! thats called lie.
schehry 1 month ago
@schehry circumulation i told you already we dont do it, wives are not part of ahulul bayt in the verse the begining part of the verse was reveled for the wives but the later part was reveled about a different wheres my evidence? The verse "Verily Allah intends to ... (33:33)" was revealed to the Prophet (PBUH&HF) in the house of Umm Salama. Upon that, the Prophet gathered Fatimah, al-Hasan, and al-Husain, and covered them with a cloak, and he also covered Ali who was behind him.
islamistruth101 1 month ago
@islamistruth101 ok lets start at after tawaf(which is shirk offcourse and those who do are not monthiestic..which itself s suffecient..) and I have even seen with my eyes and heard with my ears shiites ask from aima(now plz dont say they dont cause you know they d0)
So we will discuss if aisha r.a and wivs were ahlulbayt or not
If you know arabic ahlulbayt means man and his wives and his children so your ahlulbayt will mean your wife and children...so its the first logic
schehry 1 month ago
@schehry okay you bring up too many topics at once so lets just discuss 33:33 then we will move on to anything of your choice, true ahlul bayt does mean wife and children but in a previous message i proved prophets have general ahlul bayt and chosen ahlul bayt, the wife of ibrahim was called ahlul bayt but go 2 verses before it and allah tells her she will give birth to 2 prophets Isaac and Jacob so she became ahlul bayt when she was going to be the mother of a prophet not because she was a wife
islamistruth101 1 month ago
@islamistruth101 I can believe that ayah is not suffecient for a shiite becoz he does not derive his guidance from the koran but history and shiite hadiths.about the hadith she did not ask if she was ahlul bayt becoz its Allah Who has included her,she merely says am ialso with you? and the prophet says 'you are one good and virtue".if she did not even ask about being ahlelbayt why are shiite even quoting this..prophet also included Salman Farsi as household
schehry 1 month ago
@schehry Then the Prophet said: "O' Allah! These are the Members of my House (Ahlul-Bayt). Keep them away from every impurity and purify them with a perfect purification." Umm Salama (the wife of Prophet) asked: "Am I also included among them O Apostle of Allah?" the Prophet replied: "You remain in your position and you are toward a good ending." Sahih al-Tirmidhi, v5, pp 351,663 if the verse was about the wives then why these 5 were in the cloak and a wife was denied entrance if shes ahlul bayt
islamistruth101 1 month ago
@islamistruth101 2) Wife of ibraham was called his alul bayt in the Quran..
the ahazab ayahas goes like this(32. O wives of the Prophet! You are not like any other women. If you keep you have Taqwa, then be not soft in speech, lest he in whose heart is a disease should be moved with desire, but speak in an honorable manner.)
schehry 1 month ago
@islamistruth101 (33. And stay in your houses, and do not Tabarruj yourselves like the Tabarruj of the times of ignorance, and perform the Salah, and give Zakah and obey Allah and His Messenger. Allah wishes only to remove the Ar-Rijs from you, O members of the family, and to purify you with a thorough purification.) (34. And remember, that which is recited in your houses of the Ayat of Allah and Al-Hikmah. Verily, Allah is Ever Most Courteous, Well-Acquainted with all things.)
schehry 1 month ago
@islamistruth101 where is the indication that they are not talking to the Wives.Allah is talkign about them..its crystal clear it does not need to be furthur explained....but daughter and her husband are not necessarily part of the family that is why that was sepcifically told that they are also ahlul bayt.
Ahlussunnah have various hadith in which Aisha was referred to as ahlulbayt by the propeht s.a.w.
schehry 1 month ago
@schehry then you asked where is the indication that allah is not talking about the wives well for starters the switch to feminine to masculine words, now you say the verse is clear meaning no need to look at the hadith this is an injustice to the quran which btw says that the prophet will explain the veses wether or not the verse is clear if there is a hadith about the verse it must be used in the interpretation, now i will give you an example of a verse that looks clear but is really not
islamistruth101 1 month ago
@schehry surah 12:29 "O Joseph! pass this over and ask forgiveness for your sin, for truly you have been at fault." from reading the verse you will think that allah is telling joseph to ask for forgivness but if you look a any tafsir you will know allah is telling the wife of Aziz to ask for forgivness, then you contradicted yourself by saying a daughter is not necessarily ahlu bayt when earlier you said ahlul bayt means wife and children but anyways your argument is simple the prophet put ali
islamistruth101 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@islamistruth101 Also if the verse is using masculine gender then fatima would also be exluded..Masculine could also be used for both masclune and feminie gathering (becoz he had sons too)
Now plz tell me how can wives still be excluded if the verse uses masuline gender it would justr add people not subtract.I never said Ali and his ahl are not the ahl of prophet I accept it but his wives were also hi ah
schehry 1 month ago
@schehry fatima hassan and hussein under the cloak and recited this verse was to let them know they were ahlul bayt but there is a few problems with this interpretation first the according to sunnis its preconditional meaning the wives have some things to do if done allah will purify them so if thats the case there is no reason for the prophet to recite this verse on them in the cloak for it was only for the wives if he wanted to tell them that they were ahlul bayt he would have said it instead
islamistruth101 1 month ago
@schehry of using this verse which was according to sunnis not about them if you wanna argue it was about both then you will have to explain what these 4 will have to do toget purified because the conditions before it are only to the wives not to them, another reason why this interpretation of letting them know they were ahlul bayt is false because why did the prophet only do it to these members why not Abbas and his family? Why not Aqeel and his family? and lastly why was umm salama denied
islamistruth101 1 month ago
@islamistruth101 And I have never even heard this general and special ahlbayt by shiites?Its not even there?plz specify......also give me the reference of the hadith you mentioned about Aisha r.a. saying that no verse was revealed except for innocence becoz it may not be in our haidths or if it is it could also translate to "not revelad just about me/us" so i need to check! i do not see what is there in the verse that excludes wives from ahlbayt becoz its in continuation...its the same verse.
schehry 1 month ago
@schehry salam bro sorry for the late response ive been quite busy but instead of posting a bunch of comments im going to inbox you so we have unlimited writing space i will eaither send you a message tomorrow or the next day inshallah most likely tomorrow thanks for remaining patient may allah guide us all ameen
islamistruth101 1 month ago
@islamistruth101 don't pm me...just reply to this point here...I have had enough of shiite people resorting to abusive language so plz nop I am not gonna do that with any shiite whosoever....do it here or don't do it.
schehry 1 month ago
@schehry brother I would never use abusive language, the quran says not to abuse the idols of the idol worshipers so why would i abuse a fellow muslim? I can assure you I would never, the reason for pm is so I dont have to post 5-7 comments at a time but if you still wont agree will you move this to my channel comments its not unlimited text but its enough where I will only need to post about 2 comments
islamistruth101 1 month ago
@islamistruth101 I have seen how much Quran you follow.You have no answers.end it here!
schehry 1 month ago
@schehry entrance into the cloak if she was part of this ahlul bayt being mentioned the prophet would have allowed her in so why was she denied entrance? then you said you have hadiths about aisha being ahlu bayt but shias dont have a propblem with such hadiths becaise as i explained a prophet has general ahlul bayt and chosen yes aisha is of the general but not the chosen and then ahlul bayt in 33:33 is about the chosen ahlul bayt, heres my proof everyone's son is part of their family but in
islamistruth101 1 month ago
@islamistruth101 In arabic it does not change to any gender it would just as well read you ahlulbayt...And I did not contradicted myself daughter is ahlulbayt but her busband and children are not.so that is why they were to be specified to be also included in the family....now verse is very clear so is the hadith.Quran only uses ahlbayt only 2 times and both times for the wives.....and from where do you derive that Ali and his family are special ahlbayt and Aisha r.a. and all wives are general?
schehry 1 month ago
Comment removed
schehry 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@schehry surah 11:45-46 allah told nuh his son was not part of his family meaning he is not part of the ahlul bayt allah chose but of course his son is of his general ahlul bayt then you said Thats your shiite hadith not our hadith so im not gonna talk about that. im not sure what your refering to here please explain now if you still dont believe me that surah 33:33 is not about the wives maybe you will believe the mother of the believers aisha Bukhari, V6, #352 'Aisha said from behind a screen
islamistruth101 1 month ago
@schehry , "Allah did not reveal anything from the Qur'an about us except what was connected with the declaration of my innocence (of the slander)." so even mother of the believers aisha testifies this verse was not about her so why do you argue the opposite? you brought up many topics so for now lets stick to 33:33 and we will move on from there
islamistruth101 1 month ago
@islamistruth101 Thats your shiite hadith not our hadith so im not gonna talk about that.
schehry 1 month ago
@schehry why was she denied? also why the switch from masculine to feminine? furthermore if the purification is preconditional as sunnis say then the conditions are set for the wives so why would these 4 be brought into the cloak for this verse? because if its preconditional the reward is only for the wives not them, far as shias lieing im asking you for textual proof you cant base shiaism on individuals so show me textual proof that lieing is a part of shiaism can you? i explained to you
islamistruth101 1 month ago
@islamistruth101 You know what after I will give you textual proof you will say I dont belive n so and so book...its not that important to our faith etc let me just say that before i give you textual evidence.
schehry 1 month ago
@schehry already we do not curse we place lanat which is a dua, you said we dont do it infront of muslims implying that we are not muslims which we are, we do not do it in front of sunnis because we dont want to start fitnah its not a lie, further more when i asked for textual proof look at my video about abu bakr i use quran and sahih buhkari so i expect you to do the same use our sources which are quran and shia hadith
islamistruth101 1 month ago
@islamistruth101 so now you lanat is a dua..why dont you say then khumaini lanat ullah?
schehry 1 month ago
@schehry in my third comment i meant to say why the switch from feminine to masculine
islamistruth101 1 month ago
Comment removed
islamistruth101 1 month ago
It's funny salafis are so quick to say the prophet (saw) who was the greatest creation made
Errors. But when you say thngs like umar denied the prophet a pen. Or the 3 never attended his funeral. Or Mawyia waged war agiast ali (as) who was the caliph at the time. You are a Shia kafir. Salafis make me laugh. It's a
Branch of zionism. Islam = love salafis have turned it into this backward religion.
a4fkntrippen 1 month ago
Bro just YouTube imam ali god. And see how pure the Shia version of tawheed is.
a4fkntrippen 1 month ago
@a4fkntrippen shia islam is not what shias do, this reminds me of the islamphobes in america always calling muslims terrorist for 9/11 and whatnot but they have no textual evidence when saying so meaning they cannot prove from the quran or hadith that acts of terrorism is aloud in islam likewise when making a claim such as ali is god lacks any textual evidence at all i mean look at our beliefs he is the first of our imams not god, and read nahjul balagha and tell me if you have that same thought
islamistruth101 1 month ago
%100 true .
AryanNationAFG 1 month ago
shiite imam are infallible---->incapable of any error(has knowledge of everything)---->imam is lower level than prophet--->yet propeht didn't know he was surrounded by munafiqeen---->prophet has less knowledge than shiite imam---->shiite islam contradictions
I do not consider them muslims cause they don't follow Quran..if they are even shown the verses they start beating around the bush....yeah and even their ayatush shaytaans lie.
schehry 1 month ago
@schehry No infalibility or in arabic masoom means they don't sin and it doesnt mean they cant sin they wouldnt sin, for example can u go outside naked yes would you? no, our imams do not have knowlege of everything far as khomeni saying this i have never read it but the book he quoted is online please show me where and even if he did khomeni is not someone who we derive our religion from only the quran prophet and ahlul bayt gives us our religion, thank you, asalamalaykum
islamistruth101 1 month ago
@islamistruth101 shiite imams are infallible its an article of shiite faith if you still haven't read it you are not a shiite...don't talk about Quran the one who believes in Quran leaves shiism.I think you should read usul.
schehry 1 month ago
@schehry read carefully infallible is an english word the arabic for it is masoom i told you the meaning in my last message, if you want a shia scholar to tell you the meaning go here al-islam . org /shiism/ now for the quran imam ali in Nahjul balagha sermon 176 And know that this Qur'an is an adviser who never deceives, a leader who never misleads and a narrator who never speaks a lie. I think you need to do a little more research before you tell me about my religion or just ask about it.
islamistruth101 1 month ago
@islamistruth101 i know what shiites do they lie they dont do this they dont do that but they do everything...they lie...so dont tell me.Curse anyone you want.
schehry 1 month ago
@schehry It's sad to see someone so blinded by your people I showed you from nahjul balagha one of the top shia books that we do believe in quran how did i lie? Don't you know it's haram to claim people to be liars, did allah not say bring your proof if ye be truthful, you want to declare shias kafir atleast bring some proof to the table, also why did you bring cursing into this?
islamistruth101 1 month ago
@islamistruth101 Becoz shiias cruse Aisha r.a.,abu bakr ,umar and uthman.even though Quran speaks good about them. They even say Aisha r.a. is not ummul mumineen..even though Quran says she is....They say she is not ahlelbayt even though Quran says it. they say curse be on abu bakr and Quran speaks good about him.
Yup and nomral shiite person even circumambulate around their imam's shrines (shiachat(.)com) and they debate its correct.
schehry 1 month ago
Comment removed
islamistruth101 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@schehry far as cursing goes its not aloud in shia islam what shias do is lanat which is a dua asking allah to remove his mercy from such individuals, now aisha was condemd by allah in surah 66 and far as umar abu bakr and uthman show me a verse that praises them and dont give me a verse that praises companions in general because allah says there are hypocrites, as far mothers of the believers go shias dont deny that she is, the verse doesnt mean it the way u think it does it means they cannot
islamistruth101 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@schehry be remarried in case of divorce or widowed That is why we read in the Quran: Nor is it right for you that ye should annoy Allah's Messenger, or that ye should marry his widows after him at any time. (33:53) also in Tafsir al-Qurtubi, Volume 14 page 228:Qatada said: ‘A man said: ‘If Allah's messenger (s) died, I would marry Ayesha’. Hence Allah revealed ‘{ Nor is it right for you that ye should annoy Allah's Messenger}’ then revealed ‘{ and his wives are their mothers}’.
islamistruth101 1 month ago
@schehry the quran does not say she is ahlul bayt and shias say a prophet has two types of ahul bayt there are general and chosen general is all family members however chosen refers to thse whom allah chose this is supported in the quran by 11:45-46 noah said surely my son is apart of my family but allah said that hes not, everyones son is part of their ahlul bayt but not a prophets chosen ahlul bayt. far shias circumambulate around shrines maybe you should have read shia chat more carefully
islamistruth101 1 month ago
@schehry does it mean im worshiping my bed of course not also i would like for you to show me in shia literature a hadith from eaither the prophet or the imams saying this is part of shia islam if you can not then you have no argument now please so i dont have to post so many comments stick to one of these topics at a time btw watch my video on abu bakr its about 4 minutes and you will see him condemed in the quran and also you never showed me that shias lie.
islamistruth101 1 month ago
@schehry i forgot to mention in the book thats on that link chapter 6 is the chapter about infallibility
islamistruth101 1 month ago
@schehry infallible means their actions are correct in context of them being an example. like the prophet was infallible. infallible doesnt mean all knowing. how are u going to teach about something u know nothing about.
0feedmeplz 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@schehry infallible means their actions are correct in context of them being an example. like the prophet was infallible. infallible doesnt mean all knowing. how are u going to teach about something u know nothing about.
0feedmeplz 1 month ago
BarakAlah feek ya akhi
syrianpitbull 1 month ago
the ture islam is sunni
SuhaiBzx 1 month ago
Comment removed
lifeiznexperience 1 month ago
Comment removed
lifeiznexperience 1 month ago
Comment removed
lifeiznexperience 1 month ago
Comment removed
lifeiznexperience 1 month ago
Comment removed
lifeiznexperience 1 month ago
Comment removed
lifeiznexperience 1 month ago
Comment removed
lifeiznexperience 1 month ago
Comment removed
lifeiznexperience 1 month ago
Comment removed
lifeiznexperience 1 month ago
Many other commentaries also hold that this verse refers to Imam Ali including: Sunan al-Nisa΄i, Tafsir al-Kabir by Tha΄alibi, Musnad Ahmad ibn Hanbal,
Zamakhshari, Tafsir al-Kashif (See interpretation of ch. 5 v. 55
Wahidi, Asbab al-Nuzul, (See interpretation of ch. 5 v. 5
Vol. 6, Hadith 391 and 5991
yasirabbas1 1 month ago
Verily Your Guardian can be only Allah; and His messenger and those who believe, who establish worship and pay the poordue (Zakah) in Ruku. (5:55)
al-Wahidi in his book on the commentary of the Quran entitled, Asbab al-Nuzul, cites Kalbi's narration, that the cause of this revelation was Imam Ali. Kalbi says, “The later part of this verse is in favor of Ali ibn Abi Talib (may Allah be gracious to him) because he gave his ring to a beggar while in the state of ruku during the prayers.”
yasirabbas1 1 month ago
Amirul muminin says 'I would have cast the rope of Caliphate on its own shoulders'
Ali is likening the decisions on which caliphate was distributed with a camel whose rein has been cast on its shoulders and and goes about randomly whereever it wants.There was no Quran based principle or criteria whatsoever which could support the three previous caliphates
yasirabbas1 1 month ago
ash-Shiqshiqiyyah Continued....
Allah with the learned to the effect that they should not acquiesce in the gluttony of the oppressor and the hunger of the oppressed I would have cast the rope of Caliphate on its own shoulders, and would have given the last one the same treatment as to the first one. Then you would have seen that in my view this world of yours is no better than the sneezing of a goat.
yasirabbas1 1 month ago
This is extract from Sermon 3 of Ali A.S. also called ash-Shiqshiqiyyah regarding the caliphate
Yes, by Allah, they had heard it and understood it (Ali referring to Al Quran 28:83 mentioned in previous paragraph of sermon)but the world appeared glittering in their eyes and its embellishments seduced them. Behold, by Him who split the grain (to grow) and created living beings, if people had not come to me and supporters had not exhausted the argument (Hujjat)and if there had been no pledge of
yasirabbas1 1 month ago
hey, its the guy from Homeland!!!!
delaney12 1 month ago
Im sure Ayatollah didnt imply control of the grains of sand by the Imams as a sign of Godship, i think he implied it the same way as Solomon had control over the worlds or any of the miracles done by the prophets peace be on them all. I say this because even though they did all these things that amazed everyone it was not done with their own will but by the will of Allah
AlexBausman 1 month ago
and even in your books there is a hadish that sayd profet muhammad said hussain is mine and im hussains then how can you show respect for a man who killed the third imam who profet loved him to deat, one of the companion of profet said once i saw the profet muammad is crying i asked him why and the profet said theye gonna kill my son somwere named karbala
sonofnoone9 1 month ago
dude take your shit somewere else, how can you believe in yazid as a khalifa who killed imam hussain
sonofnoone9 1 month ago
your a kafir idiot, you guys i don't know what to say, like aisha told the womans to give theyre brest to the men's they don't even know, like omar changed the muta even profet muhammad sallalah can't chant change the word of allah how can a idiot like omar change it who even couldn't pray perfectly so tell me how can he be the true khalifa of all the muslims when he don't even know how to pray or how to red the quran,
sonofnoone9 1 month ago
you have been a muslim in like one day and come here and learn us somethign that you don't even know what it is, dude the prophet muhammad himself took ali's hand infront of 40 000 people and said menkonto mowla wa haza alion mowla, and somewere in your book sahih muslim sahih bukhari i read that muhammad said my ahle bait is like the profet nooh's boat if you get in it you will be safe if you don't you will drown like all kuffar did
sonofnoone9 1 month ago
hahahahhahaha dude i was born a muslim i will die a muslim, go and read about ghadir e khom
sonofnoone9 1 month ago
as of Moses we do know Haron was his deputy .he was enforcer of Torah so he was both messenger and Imam.the Holy Prophet PBUH has referred to this in his famous Hadith meaning Ali is similar to him as haroon was to Musa
yasirabbas1 1 month ago
@Dakosovali
regarding the Imamate questions you raised ,Ayatollahs are not masoomeen so they can't be Imams and Imamte runs in the family of Rusul only.Ayatollahs can only be Deputies of Imams.the main reason for Imamate position is to continue to implement Sharia and Keep Hujjat Of Allah on People.
as of Moses and Jesus being Rusul they didn't need imamate for themselves.Jesus had no childern and whoever deputised him made a mess of shariah and Bible and thus carried out zulm.
yasirabbas1 1 month ago
@Dakosovali
Muawiyah bought the idea of late as the outcome of Jamal favoured Ali.Faced with threat of removal he then banked on this allegation to implicate Ali .he would have been at peace had Ali Not removed him but Ali couldn't stand his corruption and Muawiyah was not to abandon Emirate without fight.
yasirabbas1 1 month ago
@ Dakosovali
the sermon unambiguously puts the blame of these people who first incited the killing and then demanded Qisas despited being implicit in killing that's what Ali was referring to when he said 'They are demanding of me a right which they have abandoned, and a blood that they have themselves shed'
yasirabbas1 1 month ago
@Dakosovali
this will expose you lies regarding the killing of uthman by so called sabiite shites? perhaps you were trying to assert the theory that shias were invented by ibn e saba and how interesting you found them in 35 AH?during the life of Ali?would Ali have allowed them to thrive in his name?
However unfortunate but these 3 great people of Islam including Ummal mominin had a direct role in organising and inciting the agitations which resulted in mob attack and ended in this sad event.
yasirabbas1 1 month ago
About `A'ishah, Ibn `Abd Rabbih writes:
al-Mughirah ibn Shu`bah came to `A'ishah when she said, "O' Abu `Abdillah, I wish you had been with me on the day of Jamal; how arrows were piercing through my hawdaj (camel litter) till some of them stuck my body." al- Mughirah said, "I wish one of them should have killed you." She said, "Allah may have pity you; why so?" He replied, "So that it would have been some atonement for what you had done against `Uthman." (al-`Iqd al-farid, vol. 4, p. 294)
yasirabbas1 1 month ago
@Dakosovali
continued
and was shooting arrows at `Uthman's house.
Historians have also state that az-Zubayr used to say "Kill `Uthman. He has altered your faith." People said, "Your son is standing at his door and guarding him," and he replied, "Even my son may be lost, but `Uthman must be killed. `Uthman will be lying like a carcass on Sirat tomorrow." (Sharh Nahj al-balaghah, vol.9, pp. 35-36)
yasirabbas1 1 month ago
@Dakosovali
continued sermon 22 Nahjul Balagha
How disappointing is this challenger (to battle)? Who is this challenger and for what is he being responded to? I am happy that the reasoning of Allah has been exhausted before them and He knows (all) about them.
Ibn Abi'l-Hadid writes that:
Those who have written the account of assassination of `Uthman state that on the day of his killing Talhah's condition was that in order to obscure himself from the eyes of the people he had a veil on his face
yasirabbas1 1 month ago
@Dakosovali
continued Nahjul Balagha sermon 22
They are demanding of me a right which they have abandoned, and a blood that they have themselves shed.(1) If I were a partner with them in it then they too have their share of it. But if they did it without me they alone have to face the consequences. Their biggest argument (against me) is (really) against themselves. They are suckling from a mother who is already dry, and bringing into life innovation that is already dead.
yasirabbas1 1 month ago
@Dakosovali
This is what Amir ul Mominin has to say about the allegation of killing of Usman
sermon 22
Beware! Satan has certainly started instigating his forces and has collected his army in order that oppression may reach its extreme ends and wrong may come back to its position. By Allah they have not put a correct blame on me, nor have they done justice between me and themselves.
yasirabbas1 1 month ago
@Dakosovali
I've given you the reference from 13 books on account of Hujr bin Adi's killing and i didn't claim any of references was from sahihayn.but tons of sunni history books refer to this incident.these are the reliable sources of history at that time and you wouldn't believe in them?
do you think none of these historians quoted from reliable sources really?
yasirabbas1 1 month ago
How does anyone say RA after Muawiyahs name! Nauzubillah
Musnad Ahmad Ibn Hanbal 6 p33
Whoever curses Ali, then he has cursed me, and whoever has cursed me, then he has cursed Allah (SWT), and whoever has cursed Allah (SWT), then Allah (SWT) will throw him into the hellfire.
143ea 1 month ago
@ Dakosovali
Typical Nawasib Thinking.In order to defend Muawiyya you implicated Amir ul mominin in Uthman's Murder ,that he was harboring the culprits.you know better that it was mob attack and had Muawiyya presented evidence there was no one more judicious than Amir ul Mominin
so did Muawiyya apprehend culprits when he came into power?
don't you think it was only a political gimmick and when he took control the question of Uthman killing was totally forgotton
yasirabbas1 1 month ago
@yasirabbas1 You didn't answer the question, like thousand other question I have asked you. You are calling me a nasabi and change the subject again. If some extremists from shiat Muawiyya killed caliph Ali (ra) and Muawiyya (ra) became caliph but rejected that he was related to the killing Ali (ra). Would you shias believe Muawiyya (ra) like we sunnis are 100% sure Ali (ra) didn't have anything at all to do with the killing of Uthman (ra)!?!
DaKosovali 1 month ago
@yasirabbas1 ups, I thought you were naqvmohsin
DaKosovali 1 month ago
mashaAllah nice lecture.
iffi0014 2 months ago
cut it off plp .the Ahlo Al Bayet are known except ,the arrogant ignorant jealous ones deny their rights..
no others nations before you have done so..every people of the book have respected and understood the Ahlo AL bayet of Jacob and Ishaq
except this sect of sick haters ..let me give you a news that you should keep inn heart by Allah's Name ,you are dying in the state of ignorant and rejection ..Prophet sw will deny you as you've denied his rights through his kinship ..die as a jew or christ
tonikdasa 2 months ago
@yasirabbas1 Killers?who killed who?
Iranshit 2 months ago
We sunni can give proof of our faith in islam salah sawm kalima zakah hajj.....can shia do same of their faith by explaining thru quran imamate maatam muta???
Iranshit 2 months ago
@Dakosovali
continued
7-Shadharat ul Dhahab, Volume 1 page 57 Dhikr 51 Hijri
8-Tabaqat al Kubra, Volume 6 page 217 Dhikr Hujr ibn Adi
9-Mustadrak al Hakim, Volume 3 page 468-470 Dhikr Hujr ibn Adi
10-Akhbar al Tawaal, page 186 Dhikr Hujr ibn Adi
11-Tarikh Abu'l Fida, page 166 Dhikr 51 Hijri
12-Muruj al Dhahab, Volume 3 page 12 Dhikr 53 Hijri
13-Tarikh Yaqubi, Volume 2 page 219
a detailed account is also in Abul Aa'lah modudi's caliphs and kings ch4 'elimination of freedom of speech
yasirabbas1 2 months ago
@Dakosovali
References in relation to the killing of Hujr bin Adi al-Adbar can be located in the following Sunni texts:
1-al Bidaya wa al Nihaya, Volume 8 page 53 Dhikr 51 Hijri
2-Tarikh Kamil, Volume 3 page 249 Dhikr 51 Hijri
3-Tarikh ibn Asakir, Volume 12 page 227 Dhikr Hujr ibn Adi
4-Tarikh ibn Khaldun, Volume 3 page 13 Dhikr 51 Hijri
5-al Isaba, Volume 1 page 313 Dhikr Hujr ibn Adi
6-Asad'ul Ghaba, Volume 1 page 244 Dhikr Hujr ibn Adi
yasirabbas1 2 months ago
@yasirabbas1 Thank you very much, but you didn't do what I said. I don't have those books so show me the text that says Muawiyya (ra) killed them >because they refused to curse Ali (ra)<.
DaKosovali 2 months ago
Ahadeth maaan? look prophet sw indeed talked about it and profecized about و قال لعلي و لابناء علي ستقتلك الفئة الباغية
قاتلك شقي في النار
الخ...
whether he ordered or it was your advocacy ..maaan look let's just turn off this scene you do what you can in order to rebuild islam ..if u can ......Assalamu Alaykum
tonikdasa 2 months ago
@Dakosovali
you're not that bright are you.i told you again and again this verse is only related to imamate and the verse confirms the Imamate continued in holy Prophet's progency ,period.No ayatollah claimed to be one of 12 imams and besides there are different levels of Adl as well .Sure no ayatollah has level of Adl Imams possess and they are NOT included in convenent as this covenent only pertains to imamate and nothing else
yasirabbas1 2 months ago
@yasirabbas1 Try just to thin logical. If you think about your argument, than ayatollahs are the zalimun and the rest of Umma except of 12 imams, because otherwise we would also be able to be leaders. My point is that the verse doesn't say people has to be masum to be leaders, but they can't be wrong-doers.
Weren't Musa (as) and Isa (as) descends from Ibrahim (as)? Do shias believe they were amongst the zalimin because they weren't imams? Subhanallah, your interpretaion doesnt make sence
DaKosovali 2 months ago
You say sayiduna and RADIALLAH ANHU to killers .well we have a problem of Justice and Adl as 2nd pillar of islam so we don't
yasirabbas1 2 months ago
@Dakosovali
what argument you have for killing of Hujr Bin Adi who was only martyred by Muawiyya for Not Cursing Ali A.S. alongwith his other 6 companions including his own son? What argument you have for Muawiyya Declaring Bastard Ziyad his brother?
the Bastard referred to In Imam Hussain's famous quote
Innad Daee (Ubaidullah Ibn e Ziyad) Ibn ad Daee (Ziyad the bastard) Qad Rakazanee Baina isnatain Bain as sillat e wa zzilla wa Haihaat Minaz zilla
Daee means low life
yasirabbas1 2 months ago
@yasirabbas1 you're welcome to show me the reliable sunni ahadith that say Muawiyya (ra) ordered them to be killed because they refused to curse Imam Ali (ra). And don't just show me the references but also the texts. Remember, the ahadith should include the part which says Muawiyya (ra) killed them because they refused to curse Ali (ra).
DaKosovali 2 months ago
as far as killing of Imam Nasai is concerned you're lying again.you better know kharjis were against Muawiyya as well and they could no way have killed Nasai for not quoting Hadith in honour of Muawiyya or the one mentioned in the reference.these were sunnin ulema of syria who killed their own scholar for compiling 'Khsais e Ali' and do you know were he asked to be buried (and is buried)? between Safa and Marwa which overlooks Mohallah Bani Hashim where Rasulullah and Ali A.S. walked
yasirabbas1 2 months ago
@yasirabbas1 You're the liar, because you're accusing sunnis for killing Imam Nasa'i. What a grave mistake and it's very disgusting. You think sunni ulema would kill a person who wants to make a book about sayyiduna Ali (ra) and because they couldn't accept Ali (ra) has a higher rank? lol. Sayyiduna Muawiyya (ra) himself said that Ali (ra) was better than him! You could prove that it was sunni ulema, although you sounded so sure.
DaKosovali 2 months ago
couldn't*
DaKosovali 2 months ago
@dakosovali
the verse quoted is clearly for comparison of families of Ibrahim A.S. and Rasulullah SAW (and Allah has mentioned several times the families of Prophets with continuation of prophethood in their families) and is strictly confined to the Imamate .every Imam is infallible and is essentially Adil as well therefore they are all Aaimma tul Huda appointed by God.The ayatollahs and marajay are not discussed in this verse.This verse is only for Imamate and you don't include muminin in it.
yasirabbas1 2 months ago
@yasirabbas1 You claim that Allah doesn't include anyone who isn't infallible in his covenant, which according to your logic means everybody who isn't infallible is zalimun. So according to your logic your own ayatollahs and past scholars all are amongst the zalimin because they aren't infallible. If you deny then they could also be leaders.
According to sunnis the verse say Allah doesn't include the wrong-doers/sinners/unjust in his covenant. He only includes the good-doers/just/righteous.
DaKosovali 2 months ago