LUNARCY: Yes Virginia, NASA Can Videotape STARS!

[staIkervisions]

What do you hope to prove with this video?

They're orbiting and taking video while being in the shadow of the Earth,(night) then they orbit around to the daylight side of the Earth, then the exposure of the camera closes to the point where you can't see any stars, much like our eyes do.

How does this prove anything other than what it really is?



[MrKandamo]

LOOK AT 5:52 , SOMETHING HIT THAT WEIRD LAYER - AND SKIP TO 6:03 AND 6:10 TO SEE THE INTERESTING STUFF.

[BlisterHiker]

Those "stars" can be seen between the Earth and the Shuttle.

Someone who believes this footage shows real stars, is either completely ignorant or delusional.

In addition, it is easy to notice those "stars" change position, and the camera was using high sensitivity and long shutter speed settings.

[nebnubs]

The cameras used at these times in the 90s were videoing in the ultraviolet range I believe. I'm not exactly sure about that, but fairly sure they are not in the visible range. That is why the stars stand out so much. Similar to night vision settings on modern cameras when pointed at the night sky. By the way, if you want to view better quality vids of these, see the secretnasaman channel, since Stubbs is the one who took the time to record a lot of this footage.

[un4g1v3n1]

@nebnubs "but fairly sure they are not in the visible range." YOU ARE FAIRLY SURE THE STARS ARE NOT IN THE VISIBLE RANGE? OMG, I nearly pissed myself? YOU DON'T THINK STARS STAND OUT IN THE BLACKNESS OF SPACE? BEYOND THE ATMOSPHERE WHICH SCATTERS THEIR LIGHT? You see, this is why people are now LAUGHING at you foolish pro-apollo nutters...You know that right? I guess you don't mind looking like a pack of complete imbeciles? Go back to a school that isn't PUBLIC!

[nebnubs]

@un4g1v3n1 Un, you've mistaken what I was trying to say. It may have been the way I worded it. By visible range, I was meaning that the camera, I believe, videoed in the ultraviolet range and not the visible spectrum range. I was stating that the video camera was not a normal visible spectrum camera. And also from all of this, you've mistaken me for what you call a nutter. Again, it may be because of my wording.

[un4g1v3n1]

@nebnubs watch?v=Es-HEsI6N0I The video the nutters hate to look at with some sense of critical thinking...Apollo wise that is....It's stars in the VISIBLE SPECTRUM range, using just an ordinary television camera....It's how they should have looked in the sky around the moon...You know, with no atmosphere to scatter the light!

[rogerpenna]

@un4g1v3n1

its clear that the imbeciles are the hoaxers. I mean, its pretty obvious NASA CAN film stars. What you CANT do is film stars AND the illuminated side of the moon, or Earth, at the same time. You need long exposure to film stars, and very short exposures to film the very bright illuminated moon or earth.

[un4g1v3n1]

@rogerpenna You are wrong. You have been lied to. The reason they couldn't film stars on the moon, was because they were on a MOONSET, with BLACK BACKDROPS. If you continue to buy into pro-apollo nutter lies, you'll end up looking like an imbecile yourself!

Peace, and Truth, if you can handle it that is!

[rogerpenna]

@un4g1v3n1

PROVE that I am wrong. Show me photos or videos, from NASA, from Russia/USSR, from Japan or from ESA... showing at the same time stars and the BRIGHT side of earth, or any satellite, astronaut, etc, illuminated by the sun.

[un4g1v3n1]

@rogerpen All I need to prove that you are wrong, is the fact you won't take the time to learn about the radiation in space which proves CONCLUSIVELY, that cislunar space is a death sentence to any human being trying to traverse it without the same type of shielding provided for by our magnetosphere, radiation belts within it, and ionosphere. Now, if you are dead set against LEARNING any fucking thing about space, then you will continue to be a complete idiot, who believes in Apollo Fairy Tales!

[rogerpenna]

@un4g1v3n1

wrong, you fool. I certainly know more about radiation in cislunar space than you do.

and more: there are THOUSANDS or even millions of scientists (physicists) around the world who understand much more about radiation than either of us... and NONE of them sees anything wrong with the Lunar missions.

If you disagree with millions of physicists because YOU cant understand radiation, that proves who is the complete idiot.

[un4g1v3n1]

@rogerpenna I always find it funny when you PAN's pretend to speak for physicists...Millions of them eh? And you have a personal relationship where they have confided to you that Apollo was real? You are truly a fucking loon, like the rest of your PAN buddies. Guess you missed all of my radiation series, in which many solar and astrophysicists are quoted mentioning how deadly space radiation is within and beyond the Van Allen Radiation Belts. Guess you just can't take a fucking hint!

[rogerpenna]

@un4g1v3n1 yes, I DO have physicist friends. Including ASTROPHYSICISTS. And yes, they all believe in the Apollo missions. And NONE of them think the radiation would make it difficult a voyage to the moon.

Your radiation series are full of MISQUOTES and QUOTES OUT OF CONTEXT.

Radiation in space is deadly depending on time of exposure and the protection you have. And dont forget there is particle and wave radiation.

Its clearly you who cant take a hint.

[un4g1v3n1]

@rogerpenna Keep cluthing at those same straws little kids clutch at when trying to explain how Santa uses magic dust to make his pal Rudolph fly.....Trying to explain away the zero radiation damage to apollo astronuts, is the astrophycial equivalent of trying to explain how Santa gets to all those houses around the world in one night.

You've been duped....

Get over it already!

[rogerpenna]

@un4g1v3n1

obviously, you cant argue with scientific facts, so you must resort to Santa Claus references. Congratulations, you are a moron.

[un4g1v3n1]

@rogerpenna Santa Claus, Superman, and Milli Vanilli make up the three aspects of Apollo astronuts.

They defy physics, are radiation proof, and fooled millions with their fakery!

How does it feel to be a fool?

[rogerpenna]

@un4g1v3n1

you answer me. Its clear here who is the fool. You keep resorting to nonsense alegories since you cant back your stupid words with science.

[un4g1v3n1]

@rogerpenna I always find it funny when you PAN's pretend to speak for physicists...Millions of them eh? And you have a personal relationship where they have confided to you that Apollo was real? You are truly a fucking loon, like the rest of your PAN buddies. Guess you missed all of my radiation series, in which many solar and astrophysicists are quoted mentioning how deadly space radiation is within and beyond the Van Allen Radiation Belts. Guess you just can't take a fucking hint!

[GUARDIANtrooper]

THIS COMPLETELY BUST THE NO STARS BULLSHIT THEORY, LMAO!! The reason why NASA wanted to do the no star backdrop, is because the meteoroids (not meteorites, lol!) are too hard to deal with. And I see people writing, they aren't stars, they are debris, even if the woman is saying shooting stars, lol! Ok, lets say they aren't stars... So why in the FUCK didn't they show up in the videos and pictures during the Apollo missions with no FUCKING atmosphere? The end was killa, love you man, LMAO!!!

[leblancguillaume]

These are NOT stars, they are space debris and satellites, you can see that they are moving. They are close to the earth.

[un4g1v3n1]

@leblancguillaume So let me see if I get this straight. According to you, space debri is easy to record in space, and STARS are invisible? Are you sure you are qualified to use your eyes, and have access to a working brain?

Last I heard, that was all that is required to see and understand what you are seeing on this video.

[leblancguillaume]

@un4g1v3n1 Where did I say that stars are invisible ? You can see and film stars in space but THESE are NOT stars. THEY are between the camera and the earth THESE are space debris and satellite. Use YOUR brain.

stars are to far away to see them move like that.

[zambi007i]

@un4g1v3n1

they're not stars. if only stars could be filmed at a frame rate even assuming 15fps. stars could be captured even in ccd only if the frame rate was much lesser than 15fps. that's the bare minimum exposure needed (in ccd). of course using films, the exposure period of a single frame becomes even less to a minimum of 1 film frame per 5s.

but i can't say they're space debris because honestly i don't know. we've only got to agree. if these are stars then why are they in relative motion?

[GUARDIANtrooper]

@zambi007i Wikipedia will keep you dumb ass hell...

[zambi007i]

@un4g1v3n1 leblancguillaume is right. if they're stars then they should be point sources of light not big torch-like objects. star photographs from any astronomy related site will confirm. moreover, starlight is too faint to leave trails when the recorder is in motion.

[un4g1v3n1]

@zambi007i Wow, another moron that thinks STARS are faint. Where do you morons breed? Someone should destroy your nest before more intellectually vacant minds are released into society!

[zambi007i]

@un4g1v3n1

i can only say 'may god bless you enough to rest your soul in peace!'

if you think stars are not faint and you could capture them in a film just as you take fotos in normal daylight or even during night, then i'd welcome you to provide evidence. otherwise your comments might be enjoyable to like-minded 'educated' people like yourself, but would hold no ground in the scientific community.

oh, &btw, we morons breed at the same place as you. difference is education! you don't have any!

[un4g1v3n1]

@zambi007i Ah, another troll spewing nonsense, instead of providing evidence that doesn't exist to support his Apollo Fairy Tales.

Still waiting for the tooth fairy to drop a quarter under your pillow as well?

[edward892]

@un4g1v3n1 They are bred from the gubbament school system and millions of hours of tv brainwashing.

[GUARDIANtrooper]

@zambi007i First of all, watch the whole video before you submit your ignorance. Did you hear what the lady is said that working for NASA FOOL? She is actually telling you they are stars and you still don't believe it, WTF? LMAO! You can even see the meteoroids shooting though space, is that debris too? These people don't seem to know much about astronomy, they are calling "meteoroids" meteors and meteorites? But that's ok, because NASA is alway correct and you will ride that dick to the end...

[lmusho]

This is an infrared camera. but im still having trouble believing we went to the moon. the evidence is just not there.

[Riyun72]

i just farted,,,,,

[un4g1v3n1]

@Riyun72 No, that was your brain releasing the mythological gas that NASA injected into it with their Apollo, and star LIES!

Enjoy the freedom, and extra room it has provided for the possibility of intelligent, and logical thought now!

Peace and Truth. Apollo Truth!

[Riyun72]

@un4g1v3n1 Lol, thx good to know.

[BadBunnyRides]

This explains it ALL!

Unless you know ANYTHING about cameras AT ALL, then you know it's just another lame Con-Job-Spiracy atempt to get attention. And thats exactly what this is, you don't put this much time and effort into something without even TRYING to find out why. So you have to know why the stars are not shown in pictures and videos yet, you just post the LIE and let the sheep follow.

You get the special fail stamp of failure

#FAIL

[un4g1v3n1]

@BadBunnyRides Why don't you try explaining why NASA only shows photos and video with the stars missing, when it's clearly possible, as can be seen in the very video you are commenting on, to take incredible video of the stars around our planet! Now, I dare you to source more than one other video on YT, or elsewhere, that shows stars around the Earth. Don't you think American Taxpayers have the right to see space as it really is, to justify the expenditure of their hard-earned wage deductions?

[BadBunnyRides]

@un4g1v3n1 Wow, no way you just said NASA dosn't show stars. When did you think "Google Sky" came from? Do you even know how many scopes in orbit and on the Eather were used or even exist??? How's that for winning your Dare.

[BjornPalmen]

@un4g1v3n1 On the left you see the curve of the Earth and some "stars" are clearly visible against the Earth.

So they must be very small objects associated with the shuttle, NOT stars.

[un4g1v3n1]

@BjornPalmen Let me see if I get this straight...Are you trying to say that what we are seeing is not stars? Please do clarify what you are trying to say!

[BjornPalmen]

@un4g1v3n1 I am saying that they cannot be stars as they are between the Earth and the shuttle. The "stars" are visible against the Earth.

[elvisinpersonator]

@un4g1v3n1

Those ain’t no stars as BjornPalmen mentioned, if they were stars they would not appear between the camera and the earth. Most, will tell you it’s debris by other space missions which they are not either. Others will say they are UFOS, others that they are critters. I don't know what they are but I am sure what they are not.

[datzfast]

i have waited all my life to see this thank you. i always new you could see stars in earth orbit and i always new you could photogragh them. why NASA didnt look at stars was just to weird. so when they videotaped moon where were the stars those men said they couldnt see them.

[un4g1v3n1]

@datzfast watch?v=Es-HEsI6N0I Done in 1982 with a regular ole TV camera according to the narrator! Sorry, I figured you would have seen that one already...

[CT2507]

@datzfast the stars were to complex to put in the moon landing videos... so they left them out.

[un4g1v3n1]

@CT2507 EXACTLY...It's why parents leave out explanations for flying sleds, and getting to every house in one night details for the other ficitional tale....

[CT2507]

@un4g1v3n1 :)... lol

[Aurinkohirvi]

To someone who says it's not possible to see stars when on the Moon because the Moon ground or Sun or Earth creates too strong contrast to see the stars, here's my reply:

The Moon ground doesn't reflect light into your eyes, when looking up. Neither Sun or Earth shine light into your eyes if they are behind your helmet - or if you stand in a shadow (of LEM for example). Neil and Buzz climbed ladders in LEM's shadow - how could they not SEE the stars?

[potrodsas]

@Aurinkohirvi Yes there are no particles of a gaseous atmosphere on which the light will be reflecting and scattered around as it does here on Earth.The sun light on the Moon is visible only once and that is direct from its source but never again as it bounces off back to space .Here on Earth we see the same light reflected a zillion trillion times because we have atmosphere.On a day on the moon ,only the part of the sky with the Sun is bright yellow,and the rest is black and stars are visible.

[Aurinkohirvi]

@potrodsas

Yeah you can eliminate them strong light sources (Sun, Earth, Moon surface) behind your helmet - and then it's just the deep space and the stars. And best case: stand in a shadow.

[BlisterHiker]

"To someone who says it's not possible to see stars when on the Moon ..... The Moon ground doesn't reflect light into your eyes, when looking up."

@Aurinkohirvi

You are wrong.

After exposing human eyes to sun lit surface and brightly lit objects, it takes at least several minutes for eyes to get dark adapted. Learn something about characteristics of optical instruments you use every day after you wake up.

[BlisterHiker]

@Aurinkohirvi

The astronauts didn't have time to get their eyes dark adapted on the Moon. Light and sun lit objects were all around them. That's why they couldn't see the stars from the lunar surface.

[DeadOriginal]

Just looks like a sperm sample on a black background under UV light.. ;-)

[un4g1v3n1]

@DeadOriginal Remind me never to hang out with you under a UV light!

[DeadOriginal]

@un4g1v3n1 , shiit,...yer' don't think I'm talking from experience...would it make you feel better if I said I'd had the snip ;-)

[un4g1v3n1]

@DeadOriginal Did you kill all the stars? Oh my!

[DeadOriginal]

@un4g1v3n1 , what stars? ..I did'nt see any stars.. How come when NASA do video footage, they pick the worst possible quality resolution available.. almost as if "to make it look authentic, it needs to be shot in B/W and on rapidly decaying celluloid... on a wind up cine camera".. why not just use a 6m pixel mobile phone like everyone else? Or sommat?

[Damienf77]

Ya know, it's even strange to me how armstrong worded his response at the press conference. "I don't recall seeing any stars" don't recall?... mankind's first landing on the moon and you weren't even paying attention to your surroundings? I would be gazing off into the distance and looking all around, highly focused and I would come back excited and proud, not looking like I had just attended a funeral. And "buzz" has a look on his face as if to say "c'mon neil, just lie... its not that hard"

[Aurinkohirvi]

@Damienf77

You are right, it is strange. And I hear people suggesting all the time that these Apollo astronauts would have been MKULTRA manchurian candidats. For one reason or another. Mind control was practiced at that time. One person would say it is ridiculous, another would say it is likely - but regardless of the opinion, it is POSSIBLE.

[BlisterHiker]

"Mind control was practiced at that time."

@Aurinkohirvi

I thought you were above the level displayed by some of the most paranoid conspiracy believers, but it seems I was wrong.

[un4g1v3n1]

@BlisterHiker The mind cotnrol has worked on your gullible ass just fine BH! You'd believe in Santa Claus if NASA told you he was real!

Talk about a level of stupidity you PAN's are mired in!

[BlisterHiker]

Wrong, un4!

No mind control never worked on me brain. My parents put tin hat on me head. Me protected! ;-)

[un4g1v3n1]

@Damienf77 Even ole Buzzy looked a little concerned that they might be outed for the fraud...I'm slowly working on a post-flight conference video...but it's slow going...There are lots of edits in it....

[datzfast]

@Damienf77 well, regan didnt recall selling guns to the contas either. that way if he reall did sell the guns he still didnt lie under oath. get it now?

[awe130]

Again proof that NASA is not always telling the truth. Keep up the good work brother, the whisper is getting louder.

Peace to you

[un4g1v3n1]

@awe130 Thanks! Same to you!