Interview with Greg Palast on #OWS, US Corporatocracy - Media Roots TV

[lughcious]

Not to presume a concern, but I have more respect for your integrity than your interviewee's.

[PNACATTACKdotCOM]

Great job Abby :)

[SirKnobofCheese]

Its all about money at the end of the day

[lughcious]

Did he finally admit that September 11 was a False Flag, and that he is part of the cover-up? Thought not.

[silvernail6]

@lughcious Spot on Lugh

[AbbyMediaRoots]

@lughcious Great way to pick your battles.

[lughcious]

@AbbyMediaRoots No apologies. He says he's mainstream, and he is. MIC

[mikecorbeil]

@lughcious Why do people like you constantly have to post stupid comments? Give the man the due credit that he deserves for what he does provide, and if you want videos on 9/11, then there are plenty. 9/11 is a very important topic, but everything he spoke of in this interview is also important.

Learn to appreciate good when we get it. If we were all like you, then we'ld be provided with no important information at all.

[lughcious]

@mikecorbeil

What did Palast say that was important? Maj. Gen. Smedley Butler exposed Standard Oil in his 1935 book War is a Racket.

Presently, an American scientist and expert in materials and engineering, Dr. Judy Wood, uses empirical evidence to link the transformation of the WTC Twin Towers into dust on September 11 to Free Energy. Her work is quite well known, and was endorsed by Jesse Ventura who was trained in demolitions.

Palast is a self involved lackey, and he's with the terrorists.

[mikecorbeil]

@lughcious I've heard of Judy Wood, but know nothing of her, so just did a web search.

911review . com/articles/green/PardonOurDu­st.html

That website is among the very best there is about 9/11, and the article, which isn't by the editor of the website, for that's Jim Hoffman, instead of Michael Green, is from 2009. According to Green, Judy Wood evidently isn't a reliable source for analysis on or of 9/11.

It's mainly re. John R. Moffett, but also mentions Judy Wood's quacky ideas.

[lughcious]

@mikecorbeil

There are many demolition videos on youtube. The structure is cut into sections with a precise rapid fire sequence of loud cracking detonations, There'd be no way to hide the noise and explosive flashes it would take to cut 110 stories up, and it would have taken many times longer to collapse, but most notably; They weren't cut up with cutter charges, the turned to dust.

If you claim they were burnt down with the incendiary nano-thermite, you'll be equally as off.

[lughcious]

@mikecorbeil

Dr. Judy Wood uses only empirical evidence. That's why Steven Jones and Richard Gage won't debate her. They're on the traitor list.

[mikecorbeil]

@lughcious Imo, you're sadly mistaken.

[lughcious]

@mikecorbeil

A topic regarding mass murder of Americans has you laughing your ass off? Are you Zionist?

[mikecorbeil]

@lughcious Who said I was LMAO?

[lughcious]

@mikecorbeil

As suspected, the article you posted is pushing nano-thermite. Do you understand that it is an incendiary? What specific *element* in the dust do you believe could not have come from the WTC?

[mikecorbeil]

@lughcious Rather, what evidence do you have that the nano-thermite or thermate theory is invalid?

Plenty of ae911truth and other video clips explain the nano-thermite's incendiary nature, clearly explaining that it isn't an explosive, but while also explaining how it is or is sometimes used for conducting demolitions of buildings.

[lughcious]

@mikecorbeil (edit)

How long do you imagine it would have taken to burn the Twin Towers down with nano-thermite? Thermite emits flame so bright it will give your eyes welder's burns. Where are the flames?

[lughcious]

@mikecorbeil

Dr. Judy Wood's evidence is empirical, not debatable. Her webpage drjudywood contains for more photographic evidence and explanation than the website you recommend.

[mikecorbeil]

@lughcious Bs, about Dr Wood.

"Judy Wood sent in her theory directly to NIST in the form of a legal document that energy weapons from space caused the destruction of the WTC Towers:"

911research.wtc7 . net/essays/patriots_question/i­ndex.html

There's a lot more at that Jim Hoffman website that mentions your Dr Wood.

That "energy weapons from space caused the destruction" is nonsense, for it's unprovable. Nano-thermate is proven though, along with demolition charges and implosions.

[onefodderunit]

@mikecorbeil

Judy Wood never said anything about space. She relies only on empirical evidence. The Twin Towers weren't burnt down or blown up. That would have been too obvious. All evidence is that they were turned to dust in mid air as you can see in every video of them turning to dust in mid air. Fourteen people trapped in Stairwell B in the center of the North Tower were able to walk away after it was turned to dust over their heads.

Nano-thermite is a red herring.

[mikecorbeil]

@onefodderunit wrote : "Judy Wood never said anything about space. ..."

Sorry, but she evidently did. People who wrote about this and other things she said didn't just dream this up.

And the WTC Towers, 1, 2 and 7, were destroyed using demolition techniques. The nano-thermate or thermite wasn't used as explosives; they were used to cut large steel beams as part of the demolition "exercise". Explosives were used and it's why tops of 1 and 2 blew, very explosively.

[onefodderunit]

@mikecorbeil

I recall someone quoting you as saying you're a Zionist hasbara pest pushing nano-thermite. I don't have the quote, but apparently that's what you said.

How do you like it?

The WTC wasn't blown up with with explosives or burnt down with nano-thermite.

Are you active IDF?

[onefodderunit]

@mikecorbeil

There is a campaign to discredit Dr Judy Wood, but no one will debate her because her evidence is all empirical. You try to defame her.

Anyone can watch highrises being demoed on youtube. The twin Towers were skyscrapers and they were not demoed - cut into pieces with explosives. Every video shows them turning to dust in mid air. That's how 14 people were able to walk away from inside the North Tower after it 'fell' on them.

[mikecorbeil]

@lughcious Jesse Ventura is an interesting fella, but isn't someone I'ld rely upon for the topic of 9/11. He might be right, but it's a bad idea to treat him as Godly about any topic. His training in demolitions doesn't make him a scientific expert.

The towers weren't destroyed with free energy. It was demolition. If Jesse agrees with anything contrary to this, then he isn't credible about this.

[WilhelmDrake]

I think the fatal flaw of today's mainstream journalism is its funding model based on corporate advertisement Chomsky & Herman lay this out brilliantly in their book "Manufacturing Consent".

[WilhelmDrake]

Simon Patten on Public Infrastructure and Economic Rent Capture

October 17, 2011

By Michael Hudson

[skaberu]

Really good job, i appreciate what u do

[conrad152]

A really interesting and depressing interview.

[sailfished]

There is not a single rule, law or regulation in the U.S. that is not selectively enforced. Know the rules well enough to know how to break them,We can beat them at their own game.

[solventTV]

Nice interview! Greg Palast is the shit.