Added: 3 years ago
From: Gunsnipe95
Views: 25,660
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (781)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • Mmm, i wouldn´t be sure about the war ending in any of these ways. I mean, in any scenary, it means that the losing side will put nearly no fight after the counterattacks to their territories... and i believe that the place of Middle East was subestimated. And so many many countries do not even enter the war. What about the resupply routes?, remember that Adolf lost the war because of that... among many other things. And of course, the always fundamental naval war. You don´t mention it.

  • Well, that settles it. I'm moving to central Greenland and live in an igloo until you idiots work things out.

  • TU MUY BIEN, ERES UN GRAN ANALISTA POLÍTICO MILITAR RECUERDA QUE MEXICO SE UNIRA A RUSSIA Y JUNTO A TODOS LOS PAÍSES DEL MUNDO SE VENGARA DE LAS CULERADAS QUE COMETE USA, MIRA QUE ORINAR CADÁVERES ESO SI ESTA MUY MAL, CONSIDERANOS ADMIRADORES TUYOS CAMARADA

    HECHO EN MEXICO

  • all i have to say is America and the UK would never surrender and less you totally wiped them out

  • I think in that situation that Mexico enters the war and help the U.S. to oust the Russians, and the United States would attempt to save England from collapse and to Canada and seek support from Latin American to drive the Russians out of Europe and Japan later help Australia

    and if they back to France, Germany, Italy, Spain and Poland could face together the response of Russia and Mexico, Canada and the U.S. would support Japan for his release

  • @soyunazarna your mouse brains could not comprehend the courage of people who have lived oppressed by false powers of the United States founded by brute force taking advantage of others, primarily Latin America including Mexico would not support United States, and instead will join with our friends the Russians and our Chinese brothers ass Head through the United States with a large penis tattooed with RUSSIA aND CHINA flag and with a piercing Iran's nuclear and the Mexican drug trade

    FU

  • And I TOTALLY agree with the gent below my post; Venezula "invade Miami?" Not bloody likely! Flordians are some of the MOST HEAVELY arm people in the country, on par with Los Angeles & New York.

  • While an interesting "GAME," the author forgot one very serious thing, which is a fatal flaw. 185 MILLION (at least) heavely armed, and pissed off Americans, AT HOME!! NEVER forget that America is THE MOST heavely armed citizenary IN THE WORLD! In the event of an attack, by ANYONE, we would all turn out, young & old, left & right, to stand side by side with our troops, AND we have the "home field advatage."

  • WTF!!! UK surrenders??? really??? UK would never surrender, even if there's only 1 soldier left, they would never surrender... and Venezuela invaded miami? the fucking V-E-N-E-Z-U-E-L-A invaded miami!!!

    sorry, that is just not possible...

  • Which means it will need to first engulf central asia, mongolia, As well as the rest of the CIS.

  • Second, russia would only have the power to fight a conventional war with europe and the west when its population is at least more than double of what they have now.

  • @jimmyjamesWang your mouse brains could not comprehend the courage of people who have lived oppressed by false powers of the United States founded by brute force taking advantage of others, primarily Latin America including Mexico would not support United States, and instead will join with our friends the Russians and our Chinese brothers ass Head through the United States with a large penis tattooed with RUSSIA aND CHINA flag and with a piercing Iran's nuclear and the Mexican drug trade

    FU

  • First of all, china doesnt need to "invade" the middle east to get oil, because it has great relationsip woth the muslim world.

  • 4:23 This would NEVER happen.

  • belgium here. I like part 2A the most because thats the one we are not killed in. I think though that it will never come to that because Russia and the USA got enough nuclear weapons to level the planet a few times. the choise will be to live in peace or to not live at all. thats something to think about for @davaipo100gram and geemoney558 and all the other fighting people

  • grow up bastard

  • u gotta be really stupid to think that the small US army would beat the huge enormous Soviet country, guys.

    and no nuclear would help - the Soviets had it to! what they also had - is terittory, so the could easily evade the nuclear attack.

    the biggest and technologicaly stongest army in the world - german nazis - tryied to occupy Soviet Union, but all the met was there deadth.

    now enough of this chit-chat. what i know is that the Soviets won WW2 and the americans helped them. we were 1 team.

  • if only one russian soldier would step a single foot on american land in a war, the us would send thousands of nuclear weapons to russia. and this is also the other way round. no us or european soldier could step on russian ground without sending nuclear weapons.

    so your video, ecpecially the invasion is not logically

  • @xxobiwan11xx

    WTF r u talking about, asshole?! in 1945 US had ONLY 2 nuclear bombs and all of them were dropped on Japan! untill the US had built another nuclear bomb - Soviet Union already had one too.

  • If russia takes over the west coast of the USA they would actually be doing a favor. Those peeps on the west cost are crazy.

  • I respect countries like Switzerland, Austria, Sweden and others.. they don't get in others shit, they knew that russia is a great country and they can't fight those and refuses NATO's join.. The russian's then don't invade them and leave them alone.. they aren't pussies, but they think before doing anything.

  • Venezuela ? why the hell Venezuela ?

  • there were no russia, ukraine, belarus.

    we all lived in one country!

    we, who have won the 2 world war!

    we, who first sent a man to space!

    we, who fought and lost millions of our friends, sond, daughters!

    We were the greatest country of all time!

    and that country is called Soviet Union!

  • @davaipo100gram Please last time i remember afgastan beat the shit out of yall and yall got yall ass kick in the world wars please SIT

  • @geemoney558 i see u forgot about the vietnam war, bitch. should i remind how the small vietnamis kicked the shit out of u/ass/a?

    everybody! google /Operation Unthinkable/. the us and GB were planing to attac Soviet Union after the WW2, but they stoped, because they knew that the SU would have win!

  • @davaipo100gram Bitch it wasn't a war it was a conflict you stupid son of bitch.Who got there ass kick In WW 1 and 2 Not us you mongols

  • @geemoney558 u are just a nasty looser, baby) were talking about WW2, but u r changing the subject like a little sisy that has no arguments.

    shut the fuck up and stop humiliating youself.

  • @davaipo100gram No you stupid cock sucking bitch Clearly your retarded ass didn't see i had ww 2 in My comment Mongol.Second of all you need to sit and shut up and stop embarrassing youself mongol.

  • @geemoney558 Clearly u need to learn some history, bitch. Soviet Union WON the WW2. in fact the soviets kicked EVERYBODYS ass in their way. so dont just be jelaous, bitch. the american army cant even win the war in afganistan, not mentioning iraq though.

    by the way, i aint a mongol, u nazi bitch. at least i live on my motherland, not ocuppy someone elses country, like u did with the native americans.

    wish to kick ur ass, but ur a typical yank. only talking. bla bla bla, right nerd?

  • @davaipo100gram you stupid cock sucking bitch.That's after yall betray germany you down low hoe.Learn your history.Second were not really even fight in iraq and afganistan the muslim are fight amoung them self.Third you have nothing to occupy because the wack ass U.S.S.R didn't have there shit under control.

  • @geemoney558 admit, u r a dumb fuck with no brains, sence of history and knowledge. i even feel bad about ur future. ur classmates (yeah, pretty sure ur a schoolboy) must be beating u all day. and all u do - is run to the internet like a crybaby. arent u, bitch?

  • @davaipo100gram second i'm out of school you dumb hoe this is little brother account.Second i'm not going to sit here and argue with you.You have your opinions i have mine.@GOODBYE

  • @geemoney558 are you having your one little WW3?

  • @hotterminator1 sorry if i'm spamming the page.

  • @geemoney558 your mouse brains could not comprehend the courage of people who have lived oppressed by false powers of the United States founded by brute force taking advantage of others, primarily Latin America including Mexico would not support United States, and instead will join with our friends the Russians and our Chinese brothers ass Head through the United States with a large penis tattooed with RUSSIA aND CHINA flag and with a piercing Iran's nuclear and the Mexican drug trade

    FU

  • @icaylza please stfu lets take a trip down russia history 1000-1800 Rule by monguls HAHA 1800-1950 yall had a little something going on but still worthless 1900-1950 getting your ass kick in both WW so sit 1950-2000 losing in the cold war and U.S.S.R Fell apart because yall didn't have yall shit together and got there ass kick by afagnastan .2000-2012 doing Nothing really

  • @geemoney558 Ruled by Mongols who, were it not for the death of the Khan, would've steamrolled Europe.

    Let's see how many countries can fight a world war when civil war strikes. The Soviet Union was the most valuable part of winning WWII, up there with American supply lines. With more trading partners, the Soviets would've won the Cold War.

    They were defeated by Afghanistan because the United States funded the opposition...which then turned against the US, and 'kicked ass'.

  • @Motive11331 Let me put you in place umm but yall were rule not europe.Second uhh you betray germany Can't even hold water.Second No one wants to trade with yall cause yall ain't got shit(well maybe gas).Second LAST TIME I REMEMBER WE BEAT AFGHANISTAN.

  • @geemoney558 Firstly, I'm American.

    No, Russia didn't rule Europe. They ruled half of it. Germany betrayed Russia first.

    America hasn't "beat" Afghanistan. Occupying a country and barely managing to keep it from crumbling isn't a victory. Worse yet, thousands of soldiers are dead, tens of thousands more are wounded, hundreds of thousands of civilians have died in Iraq and Afghanistan, more than one trillion dollars have been wasted, and the US's reputation is trash.

  • @Motive11331 And russia has a good reputation?o please your acting like russia hasn't kill people for trash talking the government.Second were done with afghanistan where focus on iran sorry to burst your bubble.Second i never said russia rule europe

  • @geemoney558 No, they didn't. Stalin and his successors, spurred on by 'tradition', slaughtered the Russian people. They were traitors to socialism, as a socialist friend of mine put it.

    We're definitely not done with Afghanistan just yet. But you think we should attack Iran? Sanction them? Diplomacy would go a long way to stopping whatever we find objectionable. Posturing and threatening Iran only endears the people to their leader, harming us in the long run.

  • @davaipo100gram are you having your one little WW3?

  • Greenland is a part of Denmark..

  • I think this was very inaccurate.

    as Trunkz said, America Would have launched their nukes as soon as they realized the other top military forces of the world started planning to conquer the planet...

    lol I like how it was just "Canada Surrendered" ... made a tear come to my eye.

  • This guy is on drugs, this simulation would never come to, because Washington D.C would launch it's nukes at Russia and China before surrendering to either country, fuck the world, if America can't be in it, might as well destroy the whole planet.

  • why would australia surrender also if australia gets invaded be sea china will ruine our beachs

  • nope new orleans has a natural defense i know because i live in louisiana the lands around it are nothing but marshes and swamps they wouldnt be able to push through

  • did you think of the population of each country and their strength in arms?

  • Lol thanks for helping Australia New Zealand

  • this is better ending

  • this will never happan

    I think russia against china

  • lol Russia jams the NORCOM

  • Why does everyone always think Russia and China are going to win WW3?

  • I think Bulgaria won't be attacked, and itself will join to Russia and other countries will go to NATO or Russia-China union. If there will be a war, only diplomatic where capture will be made by blackmail and payoff without military operations. Because M.A.D. has a chance to be.

    sorry my english, I'm russian

  • I love the way your Russian invasion of North America ignores all geographical features completely. Also you don't seem to know the american government very well. As soon as they feel really threatened they would launch every nuke they have available at the bad guys. China and Russia would both be radioactive wastelands much like chernobyl by the end of this war.

  • This one is more realistic than 2A, China/Russia won in this one.

  • Even from the standpoint of manpower this simulation is flawed. Even though China and Russia have large populations, Europe, India, and North America are a hell of a lot larger. From a materials standpoint, even with the ground covered at the start of the invasions, they would run of or materials pretty fast. The final thing I will mention is tactical bombings, they would happen. That is all.

  • dude this is so messed up u need stop playing risk kid

  • I don't think that Venezuela would participate with the military even with Chavez as president. I would say that Venezuela will sell oil to the winning side during the conflict (mainly either China or the US) while remaining in silence. That's what was done during the WW2. (Just my opinion)

  • Lol the comment section is filled with the communist anti-freedom people

  • Wait...... Greenland has an army?

  • Comment removed

  • @RAAFpatguy Technically it's Denmark's army

  • @RAAFpatguy That's what I was thinking too.  If they do have an army (i guess it makes sense) It couldn't be more than maybe 3 regiments or so and maybe a half an armored division. I don't know if they have an air force at all or if they rely on their allies support. But who would care enough to take greenland anyways? It's a useless chunk of frozen ground with next to no population.

  • @RAAFpatguy Denmark protects them

  • This guy is stupid usa has the most advanced military in the world even the world vs america america would still win

  • @TehKove My fellow American if the whole world went against us we would lose!

  • @darkobst117 not really we have a slight chance see the us ciztens has more weapons than some countries in some gangs in america does to so ita 50 50 chance

  • yay canada held out the longest :)

  • But Russians never think so. They would use the nuclear bombs if they will be attack.

  • Okayy , everyone thats fucking with usa, fuck off andd everone thats fucking with cannada ,fuckk off both of our men fought and DIED in ww1 and ww2 show some damn respect for both of these amazing countries .

  • USA suck china and russian pro and other is suck balls

  • Part 2B Is the most truth about World War III.

    Part 2A is normally the ussuall. People think U.S is the best.

  • ok here is some logic with the nuclearer weapons the us would of fucking blown the shit out of russia

  • @18375415 Ok here is some REAL logic witht he nuclear weapons. Russia has the most and best nuclear warheads in the world. Russia has a loot of SDIs or what ever how to spell it! SDI is a weapon that disables nukes in the air. RUssia will BLOW the shit out of the U.S that they will surrender!

  • @dar260 the usa has accuracy russia has brute force meaning they will blow mass amounts of land of the usa while usa destroys most important sections of military bases which = no winner simple logic few nuclear bombs goes off creates nuclear winter which then creates MASS extinction which ends the war in a draw

  • this is the best simulation i have ever seen :) i'm chinese

  • @18375415 **** you

  • The United Nations would step into this confilict the moment China invades any country in Europe, Australia/Oceanic, or Japan/South Korea. the U.N. can handle Russia and China on its own easily with Europeon, American, Canadian, and even Latin American (influenced by USA) help + U.S & Canada would not surrender so easily, they actually have battle plans in such an emergency to move to northern Canada and fight the enemy in winter conditions where theere soldiers excell.

  • ANALiteg :))))

  • as long china + russian is together it will be a problem. That your simulation showing. But remember if a nuclear country is pressed to much to defend freedom this country will launch atomic bombs as last step to survive. That like a cat is forced to the corner... same nature behaviour.

  • LoL @ North Korea Defeating South Korea on its own.

    LoL @ Russia having a military

    LoL @ WW3 not being nuclear

    LoL @ Any country or group of countries "winning" WW3

    Just LoL.

  • Canada won't be beaten that quickly. We have some of the best troops. When this countries armed forces get furious its not pleasing. Look at d-day we captured more ground then any other unit and the defences were almost as hard at Omaha which by the way was the hardest beach to capture. You should really do some research about countries armed forces. Also the U.n would have gotten involved.

  • @kingdude992 Uh Omaha beach wasn't ours dude. It was the Americans. We (Canadians) just had Juno. But we still kick ass. The first event in this stupid ww3 simulation fucked it all up. China and Pakistan are allies...

    LOL if you think Russia alone is going to take over the entire European Union. They won't ever take England, and America would join way earlier if the UK and Canada were already involved, this time around.

  • Well, 2b fits in with Nostradamus and the Chinese invasion of Australia with the U.S.A. being helpless. Also, the evils of Babylon The Great as depicted in the Bibles Revelations is definately the Israeli controlled United States and North Atlantic Terrorist Organisation, which is doomed by Geological, Financial and Waring upheaval. Sorry Folks.

  • the only thing i dont agree with is veneswala invading florida. the y wouldnt wvwn push a mile into our lines

  • Venezuela has an army?

  • As if Britain would surrender! We won WWI and WWII LOL!!!

  • There might not be another conventional war after NATO countries pull out of the middle east because battles aren't fought with thousands of soldiers and hundreds of planes. Instead with the push of a button a nuclear warhead will obliterate an entire country possibly ending a war.

  • I have a simple solution to wwIII. Russia destroys the world apart from britain. They invade Britain with overwhelming forces but Britain kick their ass because Britain rule the world

  • the seattle & west coast take over was HILARIOUS! know any us military contractors NOT GROWING EXPONENTIALLY during this recession? the only fear us has is of a political / financial nature... but mess with us & see the toys our gov't is confident about enough to cut troop needs. Put simply, our non-nuke Reagan era weapons can erase russia & make china a shallow beach for india.  Come find out so I can piss on your mass grave!

  • to Communism's triumph lead us on!

  • :-)

  • Russia could never hope to invade the US, why? 68% of US citizens are armed to the teeth.

  • Okay... I'm tired of this.

    To Americans saying Canada is useless: War of 1812. You burned down our parliament. We came back, burned down your parliament (which wasn't white until after we razed it) AFTER we took the food from it, then the war ended. I believe that constitutes as a victory for British North America. Also, when was the last time you were there at the beginning of a war you didn't start? Thanks for late arrival in WW1, you pricks.

  • @RespectMyCountry Your welcome for saving your Canadian ass in two world wars you ungrateful fuck!

  • @FalloutFanatic100 Lol. Okay, buddy. 1. You did fucking nothing in World War 1. Get your facts right. Propaganda made you forget you joined the war only to end it faster. The Commonwealth and France already did all the work needed, it was just forcing a surrender.

    2. If Canada got invaded by Germany, do you honestly think they would stop there once they had a land border with you? Besides, Russia was more important than the United States of Pompousness in the war overall. DUMMKOPF.

  • @RespectMyCountry 1. America helped the whole allied front by being such a huge power it caused intimidation among the axis countries, so if we wouldn't have come in they would have continued to pummel you.

    2. Yes, because they know they can stomp all over your Canadian ass, and all Canada can do is take the punishment because at the time of both world wars Germany had a stronger military force. Then America would have to help our ally, and fight back the Germans for you.

  • @FalloutFanatic100 If Americans had joined the war at the start instead of being a bunch of fucking neutral pussies for the majority of the two wars, lives would've been saved. Don't try to defend your country's idiocy.

  • @RespectMyCountry In WW1 it was Woodrow Wilson who decided what was to be done, in WW2 Franklin D Roosevelt decided to save all of your asses by joining the war and staying in it for 5 whole years, America forced the Germans and the Japanese surrender, without us all you other countries would have fallen.

  • @FalloutFanatic100 Goes right back to my original stetement. You weren't even present in World War 1, and if you had joined World War 2 at the start this whole thign never would have happened. Besides, if the U.S.A were the ones bordering Germany in 1939, you would have been steamrolled just like Europe did in reality.

  • @RespectMyCountry If your uneducated ass hasn't noticed we forced the Axis countries to surrender, Europe got steam rolled, the US steam rolled the axis.

  • @FalloutFanatic100 If you had bordered them in 1939 and hadn't had 2 years to hide your sorry faggot-asses in North America building up, you would have gotten your asses whooped, too. You don't seem to get it because as an Amerian you have the average IQ of someone who is mildly retarded, but I'll make it simple for you.

    You next to them, you die. You hide for two years, you win.

  • @RespectMyCountry No, you dont see to get it chump, America was and is the most powerful country in the world, and your weak Canadian country is just gonna have to deal with that. enough said, no has or will defeat us in a war or conflict. We beat Nazis, Russians, Koreans, Japanese, British, Italians, Viet Cong, and any other countries i have missed, America is the highest power on the NATO chart, Canada is probably at the bottom, cause your country is filled with cowards, its a known fact.

  • @FalloutFanatic100 The War of 1812.

    I'm done arguing now, because I claim victory.

  • @FalloutFanatic100 Oh, you're in the U.S army, I saw your profile. That explains your idiocy further, because you're too stupid to qualify for post-secondary education or any job that doesn't require killing people in countries whose names you cannot pronounce!

  • @RespectMyCountry I graduated from West Point Military Academy with a 4.0 GPA. You on the other hand have probably not made it through college or haven't even finished high school, and I'm a green beret so 1. I'm obviously at a higher education level than you and 2. I have the skill to kill you and your family in the blink of an eye. So I refuse to continue a conversation with a 12 year old who constantly goes to Google to reply to my comments, and who feels the need to look at my account info.

  • @FalloutFanatic100 YouTube is Google? Interesting. You must not have been very good at English, as you can't seem to differentiate between a video hosting site's name and a search engine's name.

    I graduated from Harvard three times in two years with Doctorates in each degree. I have an IQ of 500. I have the ability to call in a tactical airstrike on your house in a nanosecond and kill every person on your city block...

    because what you say on the Internet is totally credible.

  • @RespectMyCountry DAMN... your a beast LOL

  • @FalloutFanatic100 Hah, the first half of comments on your page are ones calling you fake. Yeah, man, I believe your story 100%. Internet credibility for the win.

    Also, again, the War of 1812.

    Have fun dying in a war pointlessly against people in a country you essentially invaded. No point mentioning that the entire Eastern world hates you, though. As an American you should know that already.

  • @FalloutFanatic100 actually america did not force the germans to surrender its war RUSSIANS!!!!!!

  • @FalloutFanatic100 america is a total poor lazy jerk even is ww2 they were always using sherman that could be easily killed by tiger tank =the british tells the americans to use the sherman firefly and the said it was too "imported"

  • @fart99gayz what do you mean too imported? sherman firefly is a sherman just with a bigger gun. and why/ how can you possibly say the us is lazy because they used shermans? without them the british may have been fucked. they won most of the European front and the pacific front. btw in not american and "standing up for my country"

  • @RespectMyCountry what you call being a pussy i call strategy we will have to agree to disagree though cause i doubt we will see eye to eye

  • @ltsGangstaBob I don't understand what you're talking about.

  • @RespectMyCountry you said before you had an IQ of 500 and had done a few other things

  • @ltsGangstaBob No, I meant the "what you call being a pussy i call strategy" thing. I don't understand what you're replying to or what you're even talking about.

  • @RespectMyCountry i dont remember ever saying that

  • @ltsGangstaBob That comment down there? Just scroll down.

  • @RespectMyCountry yea i didnt say that lol someone else must have been on my account and said that

  • THIS IS FUCK BULLSHIT!!!!!!!!!

  • this simulation is half true half not. we (u.s.) would have been involved when middle east was attacked or at least when north korea attacked south korea and another thing if russia did successfully invade the western coast wich holds the vast majority of our navy we would have instantly annexed canada and slowly push south and later west to russia and by the way you were right, cuba coming in with russia but at an earlier time and Venezuela i doubt would join but mabey very late in the war

  • in a war Japan wouldn't surrender, it's just not in our nature, we fight to the death. no surrender. also, China is no where near that strong, nor is Venezuela and cuba. honestly, Russia is the only threat in this whole scenario. 

  • Ok 4 everyone saying canada woudnt surrender they have the most undicovered land in the world and the worst army so there.

  • @theValkyrieClan1 You are lying out your ass. Canada is rated as having one of the most elite armies in the world and far less cases of friendly fire on other countries or their own kin than the United States does. Also, no, all land is discovered, because we have man-made satellites. Maybe we have a small army, but it is most certainly not "the worst".

  • As a Canadian, our surrender does make sense. I mean, most of Canada had been captured at that point, and Canada is generally a peacful country. That's why we are generally seen as peacekeepers.

  • Canada has never surrendered a war -.-

  • @lulzwecare you mean that one war were yall gave us a hand full of forces and we were like "sigh" ok this is gunna have to do

  • @KillNSpillOj First of all I'm not Canadian, I just have respect for their army because they saved my own country, as well as many countries in Europe by making Germany unocuppy while the US and UK did nothing on the matter.

    And as far as I have learnt, Canada has won every war they have participated in, the only wars the US have lost that come to mind(Vietnam) are the only time Canada didn't have troops alongside you.

  • @lulzwecare the innacuraccy made me laugh. us fought canada in war 1812 and revolutionary war at parts. how about the mexican US war, where was mexico? and btw the allies under an american leadership and fought mostly by americans saved your country. we love canada and all their help, but seriously, they werent the reason we won

  • This got stupid when India just rolled over and died to china.

  • im sure we would just bomb the shit outta russia

  • well, im happy to say my country was NOT invaded -.-

  • The united kingdom and america has never surrendered so I doubt theyd do that now.

  • @chaziboi12345 Not true... The UK puled out of America in 1776 if you had forgotten...

    U.S.A! And I doubt China would break the nations peace thready over oil for god sake...

    China is in debt to its ass and doesn't have the funds to start a WWIII. So basicly; The war would be over before it ever REALLY started.

  • Yeah few things are wrong here firstly russia wouldnt assist china because russia is now a democracy :o omg not commies anymore. China invading the middle east wouldnt start ww3 because america already did it (iraq wasnt even involved in 9/11) u went off the goal of the war which was oil so whats the point in china invading like random ass poor countries with no actual reason, countries like the uk, australia and america wouldnt simply give up and believe it or not canida has an army. too flawed

  • @JusticeBladeOfBabalo i agree and russia and china hate each other which means they would DEFINITELY not team up

  • @iDominatemkwii

    Russia and China don't hate each other

  • lmao America surrendering. Thats about as likely as my ass coming off my body and flying away.

    Plus 971QKE is right you never thought about nuclear weapons which would have been used if not by Russia or China surely by North Korea

  • This scenario is seriously flawed. You've totally ruled out the use of any nuclear weapons, and I'm sure North Korea if not China as well would use them. Based on that, the United States would launch theirs in retaliation and defense of NATO, and then Russia would launch theirs. Thus WWIII ends in a Nuclear Holocaust.

  • the U.S would never be the last to fall, what cause of their history of fighting on in resistance? Because they're famed for their persistance and if the whole washington area got nuked your telling me that someone in Michigan would stand up and say i'm going to go and fight the people who just raped my country... I don't think so

  • if the Uk went down we'd just use our nuclear subs- its all we got

  • china invading the middle east for oil would not lead to ww3 because when the USA invaded Iraq for oil, it didnt spark of ww3

  • that simulation is bullshit! watch to other!

  • lol japan surrenders to china? your forgetting the japanese have the most battle hardened soldiers on this planet and they will surrender to NO ONE, the pacific theatre in ww2 says it all.

  • @lemonboy53 errrr your watching to much manga, the japanese army is limited currently to defense and hasnt fought since WWII i believe

  • Comment removed

  • @lemonboy53 im pretty sure the japanese surrendered then too

  • how the hell does russia invade seattle ? like d-day ?! that would be ridicolous because they do not even have a good navy . it seems to me like all those ww3 simulations are eastern propaganda !

  • Russia have several high tech icbm missiles (nukes) tanks (new t-90) jets (mig 35 su 35 soon su t-50 pakfa) infantry weapons (an 94) they only don't have so much money to spend on them but to research them and in case of war mas produce them (see ww2) they are a highly modern army maybe not as modern as US like an extra flash light on a helmet. but they smarter then US so they don't spend all on weapons. so stop say Russia using outdated weapons. they don't need the high tech ones! (yet)

  • WTF?

    retard.

  • Russia & China would win. America can't produce enough oil to sustain it's daily consumption of it. Russia has a vast surplus-production ( and can support China with it ). And we all know that without oil today's war-machines would grind to a halt.

    An army is only as good as it's logistics and production capability's. Although America is quite good at both of these critical points, a combined Russian / Chinese effort would be better.

  • ok i jus watched part 1 part2a and part2b and i went through 12 pages of comments and came up with this: the people that say that russia will suceed in the invasion may be rite but if they do invade jus like other ppl said civilians will make a very strong resistenceand they will slowly retake america and rebuild the army, navy,airfore,etc. and they will probably liberate there allies that surrendered and they will bring the war back to russia and and their allies

  • @ncip007 You honestly believe the civilians with hand held guns can fight and beat a professional Russian army? The Russians will have tanks, air planes and artillery! They will be organized much better than the civilians, they will have much better equipment and one hell of a better training! USA is a bunch of fatty's, cod gamers and idiots. The only smart people in US will be dragged down by the corrupt and the stupid. And you believe you can win that war alone. LOL!

  • @GeneralBlackNorway Well, seeing as there are a massive amount of the American people that are armed, the likelyhood of the russians winning are not good. What with the Americans have knowledge of the terrain and the x factor of defending their homes from a foriegn aggressor, the Russians would be forced to fight an insurgency that would be worse then Iraq ever was. Add to that the massive amount of American veterens and ya the war would bleed the Russians dry.

  • @JimmieDeMarco oh so you were thinking of guerilla warfare. Literary it means that the Russian takeover already has happened. Whether you will make the Russians leave or not depends solely on the Russians. You can fight them, but the only way to win is by making them leave and that is their choice. You must also know that the Russian military can be a lot more brutal than the US army ever have been on invasion. So that is a hard question to answer. Russians would still have won the War though

  • @GeneralBlackNorway Ya the Russian military can be more brutal, but that did not stop the afghans from fucking them up in the 80's. Not to mention that in this simulation the U.S.A. was one of the last countries to fall. Russia would have already lost how many men before finally fighting America. ya I still don't think Russia would win no matter what. their country is so broke that they can't even afford their own weapons. now the china part I could see that being the real problem.

  • @JimmieDeMarco who are you calling broke?!!!

  • @GeneralBlackNorway Russia duh

  • @GeneralBlackNorway russia is worse of economicly then America. the sad part is they blame america for it. now honestly America is probable at fault for letting its corporations get to stupid.

  • @JimmieDeMarco well I'm looking forward to Russia's oil adventure as we Norwegians help them out for a nice 10% share :D While you In america are having problems paying your debts and making financial crisis at an accelerating rate!

  • @GeneralBlackNorway lol you do realize that the whole thing is a simulation and chances are norway you get dragged in in a real life world war 3. not to mention that norway kind of owes America for taking out germany from world war 2

  • @JimmieDeMarco yes I know that ww3 would be devastating to about everybody. But that weren't the discussion. The one nation Germany could not have been defeated without (said by historians) was Russia. And btw US. were kind enough to build a radar station in Norway to monitor Russia. If anyone would drag us into ww3 it would be the Americans. Last war Britain dragged us into war. We don't owe you Americans shit!

  • @JimmieDeMarco btw I just read in the news paper that Norwegian and Russian troops will start training together, just like our air force and navy.

  • @GeneralBlackNorway you know, an American militia fighting one of the most powerfull millitary forces in the world has already happend during the American revolution. At the time, the British probably thought that civilians stood no chance against their armies, but in the end we still won

  • @captowne You can't really compare a war of today with a war of the 1800. Fighting as militia against Russians today would be very different. However as I've said earlier, it all depends how far the invader and the defender is willingly to go. Usually too far. But having the Russians leave would not be a victory for the Americans in my mind. Would take at least 20-30 years to get the country going again after such a war.

  • @captowne and the Russians would after that with China be the new USA, while USA is in ruin and probably never have the chance to catch up and become the leading super power.