Added: 5 years ago
From: BigD822
Views: 379,918
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (4,944)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • Google architects and engineers for 911 truth.

  • It's amazing that people decide it was a controlled demolition just from watching videos. That's like looking out the window and deciding the Earth is flat because the ground looks flat.

    Yes, the collapse is remarkable, but there were no 130 db detonation charges, no detonation flashes, no trace of detonation charges in the seismic record. And what the video doesn't tell is that the FDNY said the building was unstable and likely to collapse.

  • Aaron Brown was reporting what he was told to report. He was used as a tool. He couldn't even face the camera after he turned around and saw for himself that building 7 was still standing.

  • 1.03..something enter and leave the building..watch it

  • It is so unbelievably ridiculous to suggest this building collapsed because of fires, a fire would need to be a 1000 degrees hotter than a fire could ever get it, unless oxygen was being pumped into it and then it wouldn't have collapsed the way it did, it would tilt or partially collapse.

    If the 'official' story was true then why doesn't my wood burning stove collapse every time I use it?

  • inside job

  • @goatscansing The only inside job is your retardation.

  • Ok first Im not some sheep blindly believing the government, but, I have asked this before with no answer. To do a controlled demolition you have to basically gut a building and saw almost through supports to weaken it. How could this major amount of work been done and no workers saw anything? No one noticed all the walls disappeared inside and the associated mess. And of course not one of the hundreds who actually planted the charges have come forward. They were all bought off right?

  • Inside job.Government planned. Time for a revolution. Jail all members of the CIA and make their files public.

  • @heartfire451 ~ "I am not a structural engineer" - THAT pretty much says it all , doesn't it !!!!!

  • I am not a structural engineer. I have however, seen building collapses. They do not look like wtc7. Fire damage could have caused a subsidence, but that would not have caused the building to implode like this. Whatever did this caused all the support columbs to fail in unison. fires would have to be perfectly located, burn at the exact same temp, and a thousand other factors be the same within the entire structure. Only in brainwashed dumbshit fairy land could that happen.

  • ha

  • ON 9/11 three buildings owned by the same man a total of 267 stories fell in 25 seconds total. It is a no brainer.

  • America has complete state run media. Former cia and politicians go to work for the state media. When people think they are free and are not that is the worst type of tyranny. The fact that there is no open forum on TV to discus 9/11 proves my point.

  • Comment removed

  • @PoetryHound You don't even live in America. And you say I am a nut job and BIG FOOT does exist.

  • @egderegor "BIG FOOT does exist."

    Take your meds.

  • Too bad he couldn't have told everyone an hour before the planes got there too.

  • 1:10 You see the Reporter staring out, The Smoke is just left of WTC7 It Didn't Fall yet.

  • Thank you for posting this.. it is the smoking gun..

  • The reporter says WTC 7 either collapsed or is collapsing, which is possible from fire. There's no doubt it fell by controlled demolishion, as Silverstein is on tape elsewhere saying fireman ordered the building "pulled." But could explosive charges be placed in strategic locations in a single day? Likely not, so it was probably planned in advance, to get insurance $ and perhaps to destroy govt office records.

    Hiding the truth on WTC 7 makes us suspicious that 9/11 was an inside job.

  • how does WTC7 fall when it was only hit with fire. Other steel structures have withheld larger fires than that which hit tower 7. A steel building just wouldnt fall only after a few hrs of fire.

  • @ellimist6 dude, cia owned wtc7. They thought they could take number 7 without me knowing. Forever not my friend. We caught them

  • @ellimist6 I'm not sure how building 7 could've even been "hit with fire", quite honestly. Maybe some debris hit the building. I dont know why this would cause fires though. I think the fires were caused by planted detonations INSIDE wtc 7.

  • @rog944 you don't see how burning debris could ignite fires in a building full of office equipment? are you retarded?

  • @Tommy4216 Apparently not as retarded as you, fuck wad!

  • @Tommy4216 Show me one instance, just ONE, of falling burning debris in the 9/11 videos as a result of the the 2 towers of falling. You can't! You know why? It was all pulverized steel, and girders falling. There was no burning debris after the collapses. Unless of course you count the molten metal found in the basements of all 3 towers!

  • @rog944 No your right, the fires were caused by super silent explosives + thermite, lmao

  • @Tommy4216 Yeah, and you're a walking abortion.

  • @Tommy4216 There's clear audio footage of explosions and visual footage of responders ducking when it went off at wtc 7

  • Al the idiots on here who are claiming that 9/11 was an inside job should visit wwwdotdebunking911dotcom It is an excellent website which explains away every conspiracy theory.

  • Comment removed

  • @ParagramTree Yeah and after it explains away every conspiracy theory, ask it for its lone nut theory.

  • I hope Bilderberg 2011

    doesn't

    Shutdown the Internet Next Year. 

  • Hanlon's Razor: "never attribute to malice that which is adequately explained by incompetence".

    Or was it "stupidity"? Whatever, either way works. The government failed to protect America on 9/11, that doesn't mean they did it.

  • pull it Larry Pull it!

  • they, cfr, will do anything to keep obama in, even though his long for b.c. is fake as hell. hahahah. look up KERNING. Learn like the masters. If Obama goes down the whole this goes down. It will show that the entire d.c. kept facts hid about obama and his being born in Kenya.  Hell yes he was born there. I saw his grandmother say she was present at the birth. I'm not guessing. Look up Michelle saying Kenya was baracks home country. Do it then make excuses. hahahahah. Bush did 911.

  • Please see september clues. It's only for the very intelligent. It shows EVERY film of the "planes" hahahahahaa, and shows the name of the "witness" who filmed it and shows the film. EVERY ONE of the films, EVERY ONE, was made by an employee of msm. hahahhahahaha. Nothing fishy. The film from the day show 3 different flight paths. Not just different but, hahahahah, insanely different.The reason only the brave say this is because this proves 100% media in on it. see how they attack truthers.

  • @poetryhound You need to stick to poetry and I'll stick to Metallurgy. 911 was an inside job. A master metallurgist did first notice the con. For one thing, think about the floors. Flooring from wall to wall. Steel reinforced concrete. The fuselage would have not only gone through outer beams, the mammoth inner beams but the task would be the fuselage going through the floors. It would span about 4 floors. But lets say 3 or even 2 floors. Plane can't plow floors come out other side fine.

  • 5.7.2011

    Alex Jones warns about the a potential false flag attack. Counter-terrorism

    expert Dr. Steve Pieczenik concurs with Alex’s outlook, urges the good men and

    women inside the system to say no to this shameful and dangerous tactic artice

    on InfoWarsDOTCOM "Official Government Disclosure Has Begun" article on

    front page of DivineCosmosDOTCOM Contains NSA + FBI files

  • @ the infamous Poetryhound, you are a tool and you will go down in history as a tool.

  • Thank goodness the NIST report officially debunks all the truther-9/11 kookery.

  • @BullToTheShit No way could a group of highly trained and experienced highrise structural engineers, fire protection engineers, metallurgists, etc. know more than some uneducated, government hating conspiracy theorists.

  • because of the 9/11 cover-up

    both parties are not trusted

    news media not trusted

    united states not united

  • @ryanshaunkelly Israel not trusted (DUH)

    UK not trusted

  • @Prancer1231 Agree.

  • @thi711 No one says fire alone brought down the twin towers. The jetliners used as missiles had a little something to do with it.

    WTC 7 was the first and only skyscraper to fall from fire alone. And so what? Are you claiming nothing can happen if it's never happened before? That's not very smart. Fire can weaken structural steel and fire has caused all kinds of steel structures to collapse. Nothing is suspicious about that.

  • @thi711 you watch too many films

  • @daveygravey123456

    Baby's Day Out is my favorite film!

  • @bananaphone83 that explains a lot!

  • @thi711 The only dumbshits are 9/11 conspiracy hacks.

  • @DontCancelThisAcctYT ,keep your blinders on, continue massive arrest on no charge,keep the spying on their own citizen ,dont question the 9/11 comission and soon you'll have a new SS ruled country.....ZEIG HAIL!

  • @thi711 dude.....other fires are normal fires...those in twin towers were fire from jet fuel which obviously has temperature beyond normal fire....and so steel would have melt slowly & easily causing the fall.......or why dint you crash a plane in a skyscraper and show the world that it stands

  • @thi711 dont know about the WTC 7......bt the other two could have fallen from fire....if u remember plane also crashed in the building causing the fire & the fire wasn't one caused by a burning cigarette

  • @ishanfication most of the fuel explod outside the buildings ,remember those huge fire balls....

  • 9/11 twoofers rely on delusion to keep their failed “movement” alive in the good company of other fantasy movements like UFOs and Bigfoot. At least there are plenty of dirt-dumb neoNazis around to keep the failed ideas alive in paranoid, biased and bigoted minds. They exonerate the 19 terrorists as they try to manufacture evidence that turns out to be hearsay, lies and junk science. It’s a comedy show of ignorance.

  • Responsible people around the world are waking up to the fact that the WTC complex was destroyed by controlled demolition.

    Once people have access to the facts, it’s pretty hard for them to keep swallowing the party line.

    Welcome, Kevin Bracken, Australian Trades Union President.

    watch?v=tE3pMPObcGU

    It’s a fact that 75% of our friends down under agree with Kevin on this issue. It’s time for a no-holds-barred investigation of 9/11.

  • fuckin CNN why your reporters are never got injured or died while reporting you know why you fucking reporters always report after the aftermath, or keep distance from the real event when taking place, but when you report when things get safe and sound you fuckers report like you know whole lot of shit which means CNN = corrupt news network... fuck you assholes...

  • Ten years later and the conspiracy tards still can't come up with evidence of a controlled demolition.

    They can't even decide among themselves who did it, how it was done, what sort of explosives or incendiaries might have been used, what the purpose of blowing up buildings would have been, or anything.

    They're all running around in different directions screaming, "Wake up!" like unorganized, paranoid lunatics.

    At least they're good for comedy.

  • The WTC Complex was brought down by controlled demolition, that’s a scientific fact

    If you want all the facts, and a comprehensive analysis of the evidence, go to A&E911Truth

    If you want fiction, read the official conspiracy theory, which is nothing more than an obscene fairytale

    Most people understand that you can’t knock down 3 massive skyscrapers with 2 airplanes

    Welcome Senator Mike Gravel to the long list of concerned citizens now onboard with the truth

    watch?v=9b5DBFd9tVw

  • So many people still don't know this building went down on 9/11

  • Well why do people need to spend millions on controlled demolition ??

    JUST SET FIRE TO THE FURNITURE on a few random floors here and there and.....

    BINGO !! .....It collapses neatly into it's own footprint ......

    Why waste money on explosives ?

    Duh !

  • NIST engineer John Gosh was caught in the act of denial and cover-up regarding the presence of molten steel due to active thermate.

    Youtube search engine: "9/11: NIST engineer John Gross denies WTC molten steel (extended)"

    Fires due to alleged airplane-fuelled fires may weaken ,but are not even close to providing the heat to "melt" steel....however thermate creates a chemical reaction that melts through steel.. Thermate reactions create liquid molten steel.

  • BTW. flt93 was supposed to hit bldg7 so that idiots would have an easier time in believing a bldg would collapse. Actually fuel at impact was vaporized & mostly burned off within a few minutes & as such didnt have nough tme to deform steel supports. In fact, there are vids of survivors looking out the impact site hole. If it was so hot how did they get there looking for rescue? Why would flt93 fly all the way to DC if the intent to crash was already known? It was supposed to go to nearer NYC

  • @morttodd "flt93 was supposed to hit bldg7 so that idiots would have an easier time in believing a bldg would collapse"

    What luck that WTC 1 fell on it and started the fires. And what luck that the firefighters reported that the building was unstable and likely to collapse. And what luck that at the time of collapse no detonation charges were seen or heard.

  • @bagintree Perhaps they thought the bldg would collapse from the numerous explosions they reported in lower levels after impacts in 1 & 2 and in 7 by the late bldg manager who was curiously enough getting more and more vocal about the whole affair, raising disturbing questions, Pity his mysterious death at so young an age, yes? Cant be because of fires as fires have never collapsed a skyscrapter bldg before, or since, so firefighters had no more reason to think fire would do it than UFO's might

  • @morttodd Ah, so the firefighters who said WTC 7 was unstable were lying, eh?

    Good theory!

  • @bagintree I haven't seen video of firefighters on 9/11 saying the building was unstable. please tell me the titles of those videos so i can look them up. I Have, however, seen the videos of firefighters on 911 saying there were explosions in the WTC lobbies, basements, etc. look those up urself.

  • WOnderfull, the only towers that have ever collapsed due to smoke or fire in history of the world.

    WOW lookie all the big flames! Smoke means whatever fuel dsnt getting enough oxygen and is having difficulty burning, resulting in a flame far too cool to recrystalize steel, too cool to even combust fuel resulting in hydrocarbon particulate smoke/ash.

    Ask a welder if you can heat steel enough to melt, recrystalize or fail with a reducing atmsphere (ie oxygen starved) flame. (HINT:It can be done)

  • “It’s hard for me to believe building seven came down by itself, I was gratified to see Geraldo Rivera investigating it, and I’m gratified to see that people across the board are interested … 9/11 couldn’t possibly have been done the way the government told us”

    Judge Andrew Napolitano (Fox News Legal Correspondent)(Infowars 11/23/10)

    Wake up folks, the WTC complex was destroyed by controlled demolition to an absolute certainty.

    Truth deniers are irresponsible cowards and traitors.

  • Zionist Judaics did 9/11 and World Wars.

    Google: 911 missing links

  • The script went out a little too early i think.

    Not every plan goes perfect, just like the JFK conspirators were not expecting for the zapruder film.

  • @rhodes1986

    A "script?" Telling the reporter to say what she would have said anyway? Sure, that makes a lot of sense.

  • @bagintree I'm pretty sure reporters always read from a script. Its called a teleprompter.

  • One would have to be out of his mind or a true republican to think this wasn't done by the hand of the illuminati...NWO....This opened the door to what is today. Bushes kill their own people to gain money and power. They should have been swinging next to Sadom.

  • has anyone ever seen a video of the building from the other side? NO.. know why.. cause you couldn't see it because of the smoke and FIRE. It had a huge hole in the base. I saw it with my own eyes.

  • The conspiracy believers still have not come up with any evidence of any inside job. All their paranoid claims were destroyed long ago and now they act like creationists and alien abduction believers, endlessly repeating their tired old nonsense to any gullible morons who still might be listening.

    The world's highrise structural engineers, metallurgists, fire protection engineers, etc. have moved on. Almost no one takes the parnoid 911 conspiracy nutcases seriously.

  • Refusing to deal with the reality of 9/11 is by far the worst threat to world peace. Don’t pretend to care about the 3000 victims and countless other dead, if you won‘t face the truth.

    We need to uncover the absolute truth of what happened on 9/11 or forever cease to exist as a free people. If you think you’re a Christian, yet refuse to deal with the truth, you’re in for a rude awakening.

    Millions of people are dead as a result of 911. It’s the most important issue we will ever face.

  • Mother Plane : Define, Explore, Discuss ]1 The Mother Plane was made to destroy this world of evil and to show the wisdom and mighty power of the 1MAN AND THE INVINCIBLE ALIENS AND IMANDAY HIS NAME I CAN TELL...Children chant "with our blood, with our souls, we sacrifice for ... THE WORK OF THE 1MAN THE HOLY GHOST AND THE MIGHTY ONE.... THE MOTHER PLANE.....CNN International: 'Global Office' Topical Promo (2006

  • By any rational assessment, 911 twoof is in decline. Hits on 911 conspiracy sites continue to plummet from their highs in 2006. Attendance at 911 conspiracy rallies has likewise plummeted. In 2009, the widely publicized Sept 11 rally in Manhattan barely drew 100 people. In 2010, they didn't bother holding one. No highrise structural engineers buy into any of the zany demolition theories. Neither do metallurgists or fire protection engineers, & most importantly, neither do hardly any Americans.

  • @PoetryHound your so wrong, the truth movement continues to grow with the aid of the internet. Why do you think Obama is so concerned with getting control of the internet? Its how the truth gets out.

    The people who debunk the questions posed by the truth movement are the ones who see it as a threat to their career or are on the payroll. These unanswered questions only create more disbelief in the official story.

    Im no scientist nor do I claim to be any political expert, but I know common sense.

  • @killersbhoy "the truth movement continues to grow"

    Nope, no evidence of that. Statistics show the opposite.

  • You think the people who hold banners in protesters groups are the only ones contributing? There are many who have wakened up to the lies & corruption who are willing to contribute in other ways. Funny thing is, you are naive enough to think that families and relatives and supporters will actually forget all this and go quietly.

  • @killersbhoy "There are many who have wakened up to the lies & corruption who are willing to contribute in other ways."

    You can make any claim you like. But it's not believable if there's no evidence to support it.

  • @PoetryHound theres absolutely ENDLESS evidence to support it. ENDLESS. I would first challenge you to explain why no vids of the pentagon crash have been released, why there was molten steel pouring out of and pooling below the WTCS, and how WTC7 imploded at freefall speed (admitted by NIST). I encourage you to actually consider the evidence presented everywhere, rather than just watch debunker vids full of pseudo science.

  • @PoetryHound "most importantly, neither do hardly any Americans" Ha! talk about being misinformed, most Americans now recognise the official story don't add up .

  • @killersbhoy "most Americans now recognise the official story don't add up"

    If you actually read the poll results instead of making shit up, you'll understand that most people thought the Bush Administration was not revealing everything and was trying to cover up its incompetence and lack of preparedness. That's very different from believing there were pre-planted bombs in the buildings. You'd be lucky to get 2% who believe that.

  • @PoetryHound Actually, the latest angus reid poll found that about a third of americans (if you split the unsure) agree with this statement “The Sept. 11 incident was a big fabrication as a pretext for the campaign against terrorism and a prelude for staging an invasion against Afghanistan." (26% agree, 12% unsure). Theres also a strong pollster bias against agreeing to the statment so its fair to say the numbers are probably a low-ball figure of those who agree.

  • @BBBWWWVVV From the Angus Reid poll, just 15% of respondents believe two allegations about 9/11 (controlled demolition at WTC, United 93 shot down) are credible. That's consistent with the 15% who believe Obama wasn't born in the USA. You'd probably find at least 15% who still say they believe the hijackers were Iraqi. A year after 911, it was 89%. Meanwhile, 40% of Americans believe in ghosts.

  • @PoetryHound Wow didn't realize you were a 9/11 troll.................

  • @PoetryHound Everyone in the rest of world knows 9/11 was an inside job. There's just no results when you fight the government so people have given up. The polls show that less than 50% of people around the world believe the official government story. Most of those just haven't heard anything to the contrary, particularly in the states where your news is filtered like no other. Really, I don't know how you can deny the inside job, the evidence is overwhelming.

  • @BBBWWWVVV "Everyone in the rest of the world knows 9/11 was an inside job"

    No they don't. You made that up. You're full of shit, and the proof is that you can't back up your claim. No wonder truther koo koo rallies can't attract anyone except a few unemployed white kids.

  • @bagintree Just google opinion polls on 9/11 genius. And while your at it you can tell me why no footage of the pentagon attack was released, why molten steel poured out of the wtcs, and how wtc 7 imploded from office fires. good luck!

  • @BBBWWWVVV I've already looked at the opinion polls. Turns out you're wrong.

    "Everyone in the rest of the world knows 9/11 was an inside job"

    Pure bullshit.

  • @bagintree Turns out ur lieing. I went and checked again, just to be sure, and wikipedia says that only 46% of people polled worldwide believe the official story. Also of interest, the most recent poll (2010) in the US says that 1/3 of americans believe the whole 9/11 story was a fabrication. thats 100 million people in the states alone.

  • @BBBWWWVVV "only 46% of people polled worldwide believe the official story"

    Yeah, but you first said "Everyone in the rest of the world knows 9/11 was an inside job"

    So it turns out that YOU were the one who was lying.

    You also forgot to mention that only 15% said they thought the US caused 911, 7% said Israel, and 25% said they didn't know who was responsible. That last number may be due less to a conspiracy belief than to just being uninformed.

  • @bagintree "everyone in the rest of the world knows 9/11 was an inside job" <-- thats called a blatant exaggeration, a hyperbole, to make a point. To attack this one point, and say that it is "lying", is very weak of u. Why don't u try addressing the rest of my comments, the facts, the evidence, etc. u douchcock.

  • @BBBWWWVVV

    Thanks for admitting your exaggeration.

    I wonder how many Americans still think Saddam Hussein was behind 9/11. Lots of people got that wrong. Guess we can't rely on polling results alone for an accurate view of reality, can we?

  • @bagintree u r extremely retarded. do u not know wut a hyperbole is? the fact that most americans think saddam hussein was behind 9/11 only highlights the bush administrations misinformation. Somehow the iraq war was justified through 9/11 and that is why americans believe this. now stop being a douch and answer the real questions.

  • @BBBWWWVVV "do u not know wut a hyperbole is?"

    Thanks for admitting you were engaging in hyperbole. Not only do not most people in the world thin 911 was an inside job, the MAJORITY of people don't think so.

    "the iraq war was justified through 9/11'

    Actually, the main reason given for the invasion was WMD. That turned out to be false, but at the time, that was the justification.

  • @bagintree thanks for not refuting anything ive sed or answering the questions i presented to you. let me reiterate: Tell me why video of the pentagon crash has not been released, tell me why pictures of the crash site in penn show no plane debris, tell me why molten metal poured out of the wtc 1 and 2 and pooled in the basement, tell me how wtc 7 imploded because of office fires. tell my explosive residue was found in several samples of wtc dust collected from different areas of the city.

  • @BBBWWWVVV "I have only scene scholarly articles and videos by scientists, architects and engineers in support of demolition theories."

    How could you see any if none exist? In which reputable journals would I find these imaginary scholarly articles? The jUrinal of 911 Studies? I suppose you consider that a source of "scholarly articles." Or how about Bentham Open, which accepts pretty much anything sent to it? This is a basic problem for the truthers - all they have is junk science.

  • @BBBWWWVVV "Turns out ur lieing

    Actually, it turns out I was telling the truth. You were the one lying - exaggerating, actually. And it was a pretty big exaggeration. Not everyone in the rest of the world knows 9/11 was an inside job. Not even a majority believes that.

    Why do you suppose none of the demolition theories are having any impact in the scientific community? How come almost no scientists or engineers take it seriously? Are they all afraid of being assassinated by the CIA?

  • @bagintree u r sooo stupid! a "pretty big exaggeration"? its enourmous, u can't take the word "everyone" literally u moron. Please show me the evidence that scientists and engineers do not take demolition theories seriously. I have only scene scholarly articles and videos by scientists, architects and engineers in support of demolition theories.

  • @BBBWWWVVV

    show me the evidence that scientists and engineers do not take demolition theories seriously"

    The evidence is the silence. None of the various demo theories are presented in scholarly papers. None are taught in any engineering schools in the world. None are presented at engineering conferences. No construction codes have been changed in response to them.

    The only place they're discussed is on internet conspiracy forums. Steven Jones & Richard Gage are laughingstocks.

  • @bagintree turns out ur a troll

  • @PoetryHound

    Naturaly time passes interest wanes. This is what the conspirators knew would happen. That does not mean that it did not happen the way Truthers say. You fail to see the progress Truthers have made by their efforts. We are not involved in a war in Iran that was looming when 911 was still fresh. Dissent is strong all over the country. Look at the largest marches in Washington in history & The Tea party movement. People are not trusting the Gov & that‘s what Truthers want. Dissent!

  • @PoetryHound well, that explains why America is in decline, too many naive idiots in America! USA! USA! USA!

  • @kingnek I think he's saying that to try and make it look like people are giving up. He could be a paid troll whose job it is is to make people feel helpless. There are in reality millions of people who still don't buy into the results of the first inquest.

  • @PoetryHound Ur an idiot please explain to me how building 7 collapsed. Because the arguments for WTC 1 and 2 collapsing are not viable to 7 there is no explanation look at the fucking video idiot and use ur brain if you don't scratch your head you're a fucking ignorant moron.

  • @NosoCOMINSOON Yea ya gotta agree i guess.

  • @PoetryHound I agree with most what your saying because people forget and move on with there life and unfortunately as humans this is just how we go about life, whether we know were lied to or not we realise theres not much we can do or simply cant be bothered. There are many credible engineers who would still challenge the nist reports findings so i disagree with you there. numbers fall on conspiracies because its interesting for a while then go back to normal life regardless of the reality.

  • @PoetryHound I look forward to seeing you in your nearest FEMA camp soon :D

  • @magicalhearingman

    I've already been in the FEMA camps. They weren't as bad as I thought they'd be. But the sushi selection wasn't very good and the line for the full body massages was too long.

  • @PoetryHound Lmao comedy and sarcasm fail

  • 911 truth is on a roll.

    Over 1400 architects and engineers, numerous scientists, family members, military and ex-military, professionals from every walk of life, and most importantly, about 84% of the American people don’t buy all or part of the official conspiracy theory, which is nothing more than an obscene fairytale.

    The law requires a legitimate investigation, which even the 911 Commission admits never happened.

    Only **CRIMINALS** do not want a real investigation.

  • That and only 3 steel reinforced buildings have EVER collapsed in the HISTORY of the world, all on 9/11. And building 7 without any jet fuel. Absurd. Like I said, if you believe it, you're just afraid of reality.

  • @deathprophet311 "The only 3 steel reinforced buildings have EVER collapsed in the HISTORY of the world"

    Wrong. Scroll back. I listed some others. BTW, no one says WTC 1 & 2 collapsed only from fire. There was another major factor in their collapse. Can you guess what it was?

    Hint: They fly through the air.

  • And we SHOULD becasue it IS quite diabolical. When you hear the government publicly say that it is going to focus as much effort as it did overseas in the last 10 years, HERE IN the U.S. over the next 10 years, it is an alarming thing. That and Obamas CIA hitlist for American citizens that is public knowledge. Man is it coming down.

  • @deathprophet311 "Obamas CIA hitlist for American citizens"

    See? None of you conspiracy believers are sane. All of you believe in a whole host of conspiracies, from Obama's hitlist to fake moon landings to the N. American Union. But I have a suggestion. Since your brain-dead "movement" is in precipitous decline, why not join forces with your brothers-in-arms in the holocaust denial and alien abduction camps? Then you might be able to get a decent turnout at your cute little rallies.

  • @PoetryHound Ignore the idiot conspiracy kooks and focus on the evidence.

  • Well, if you don't believe that 1400 architects and engineers AND some of the 9/11 commisioners THEMSELVES are asking for a new investigation, then you're just not living in reality. I woke up 2 years ago and was mad it took me so long to realize such an OBVIOUS truth. But I understand people not wanting to face the facts and reality. Knowing that it WAS done by elements of our own gov't is a scary thought. And unfortunately means we have to question everything SINCE 9/11.

  • Jesse Ventura Conspiracy Theory 9/11: The Pentagon

    Just came out aired :12/17/10

    watch?v=f9tvrYg85qU

    Yeah and as you watch Jesse Ventura Conspiracy Theory 9/11: The Pentagon

    Watch a section of the below video at 7:30 minutes to 8:35 minutes as it adds more info to what Jesse has covered there.

    watch?v=iW23PuBKiA0#t=7m30s

    Pay attention to what he says there for the next 65 seconds.

    The only backup for the files lost at the Pentagon was in WTC 7.

  • “Whereas many disturbing facts were consciously ignored by the 9/11 Commission; be it resolved, therefore, that the Colorado Democratic Party calls for the establishment of a truly independent Grand Jury and public investigation … in order to find the truth of 9/11/2001, so that we have a greater probability of preventing attacks of this nature in the future”

    A legitimate investigation is required by law and even the 911 Commission admits that never happened.

  • What a piece of shit this media reporter really is. Fuck him! Notice how he mistakenly was anticipating the collapse of WTC 7 and just milking the commentary? "Yeah this building has been on fire since 4:15pm and it may collapse."  Go fuck yourself! We're not stupid anymore! Government fucked up!

  • This is proof beyond doubt! If that women had reported the building collapsing 20 minutes before and the building had stood, then you could call it an error.

    However, since it DID collapse this is incontrovertible proof that someone had foreknowledge. Wow.

  • @shackle5 Nah, she made a mistake. Everyone was anticipating the collapse and she got her wires crossed and thought it already had collapsed. Lots of reporting errors that day. Big deal.

    Why do the conspiracy kooks keep misinterpreting everything and making a big deal out of innocuous things?

    Answer: Because they're clowns.

  • @PoetryHound No actually. It's because anybody with a modicum of intelligence knows that buildings don't collapse into their own footprint in demolition fashion as a result of fire. Especially, buildings that were only set alight by falling debris. You couldn't convince us here of that kind of poorly thought out lie but for some reasons Americans are kind of stupid, or at least most of them are.

  • @zebbedi Who says any of the WTC buildings collapsed in their footprints? No one who was there. Only conspiracy kooks who have no qualms about making up shit. What's so hard about believing falling debris started fires? It did in other buildings. According to the FDNY, the fires were really going. The truly stupid people are those who believe there were silent, flash-free explosives that left no trace in the seismic record. Yes, futuristic magical explosives were used. Sure, makes perfect sense.

  • @PoetryHound You're an idiot. We have video footage of the buildings falling into their own footprint. Also, no-one is disputing that WTC7 was on fire because there is video evidence of that too. What is disputable however, is that a building can just collapse from being on fire. Because, if that really is the truth the architect and contractors that designed and built them need to be sued. The buildings fall just like controlled demolitions and there really is no explaining that.

  • @zebbedi "We have video footage of the buildings falling into their own footprint"

    No you don't. Because none exists. You're just regurgitating bullshit you've been spoonfed by other conspiracy kooks.

    Who says a building can't fall from fire? That's right - exactly who says that?

    Answer: Only kooks with conspiracy on the brain.