Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)
- Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
or sign in to load a different list.
Loading...Saving...
Loading...Saving...
very nice
kheder91 2 months ago
oh i think i get it so o+(-21) would be +21?
lindxey2 5 months ago
Great videos!
gradeahaze 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
This guy is FAKE! It's all wrong....
SH0TTYMAD 2 years ago
Please,keep doing this videos!
Alpaccino007 3 years ago 6
still hate math tho. thanx for the vid.
fukyocar 3 years ago
you cant solve for y.. there isnt enough given information to solve for it. Thats the answer in its simplest of terms.
gstylez0107 3 years ago 3
how come you don't solve for y in your last problem ? You left the answer 7y+10 ?
brownbug007 3 years ago
ok thanks gstylez :)
brownbug007 3 years ago
Note that the last component "7y +10" is an expression, not an equation. What you have done is generate an equivalent expression (equivalent for all real numbers y) to the original expression. You cannot solve for y here as this is not an equation such as 7y + 10 = 17
sleeper2345 3 years ago
7y +10 is already the answer. This lecture is about performing equations not solving for the variables. Get it?
emostranger15 2 years ago
OK I got it thanks
brownbug007 2 years ago
Thank you sir
Leny1777 3 years ago
nice!well explained and clear. This is simple, but I hate math when it gets harder.
Killa8 4 years ago
nuff love for the info appreciated
leagav 4 years ago