Panzerfaust Anti-Tank Weapon

[Trashcansam123]

The Panzerfaust could penetrate even the thickest of tanks,like the Iosif Stalin.

[snidelywhiplash]

George C. Scott narrating FTW.

[redreaper2020]

imagine if they were making the big ones en masse in 1940 and gave them out to the panzergrenadiers...

[HuskerSeaofRed]

Did the Germans give their "campers" the panzerfaust? Their lil prick grand kids now play Call of Duty. :-) peace

[Neovator69]

One argument: Panzerfaust - 30m, 60m, 120m. Problem solved! 

[karthikbans]

I heard panzerfaust were use and throw weapons but in the movie they seem to assembling it.

[RolfeynatoR]

@supersoviet8055 cuz the schreck was better i suppose

[slyrader1]

i shoved a panzerfaust up the enemys arse

[supersoviet8055]

If the Panzerfaust was so good then why was it replaced by the Panzerschrek?

[desertstormer96]

@supersoviet8055

The Panzerschreck had a better range.

[THEIRA21]

@supersoviet8055 it wasnt? they were produced simultaneously they were both very very effective panzerschreck had better range yes but the panzerfaust required only one man

[hogiesanKenobi]

@supersoviet8055 It was not replaced . They continued in parallel service . The shreck was a derivitive of the clumsy pupchen.

[Theakker3B]

@supersoviet8055 They're actually two different weapon types and the Panzerschreck actually came first. The Panzerschreck was a reloadable RGP, it fired a rocket. The Panzerfaust could only be used once and fired a grenade charge that wasn't rocket propelled. The Panzerfaust was more like a mortar than an RPG.

[redreaper2020]

@Theakker3B Panzerfaust and its predecessor, the Faustpatrone, were very small recoilless rifles firing what was basically a big rifle grenade.

[SpiroHrvoje1989]

This is a panzerfaust, it fausts panzers

[Kingcove1]

what does this extract come from

[a721402]

German always have some of highest tech in the world, Isn't it?

[kyoshiroma]

@a721402 and they always lose, isn't it?

[starsunlocked]

@kyoshiroma USA is also loosing every war. Vietnam, Golf, Iraq etc

[kyoshiroma]

@starsunlocked are you sure man? I think USA only lost in Vietman, and not due to military reasons, they just lost the political issues but not at the field

[jambiiii00]

@kyoshiroma USA had alot more casualties then vietnam... just becouse theres more of you dusnt mean you are winning. if a team of 100 charge 50 and eventualy win with 10 man standing... who was realy winning ?

anyways noone can deny the german's ingenuity during those times... alot of their technology is still being used today... they also took a daring kick on the medicalfields and we are alot further in that field now then we would have been without the all the war's going on.

[kyoshiroma]

@jambiiii00 at the end the most important thing in war is win the war at a reasonable cost. In Vietnam, US didnt lose at the field and Vietnam got more casualties, but Vietnam get the political goals and the war was far more expensive to US goverment and people over than Vietcong because of that te finally lose, but again not at the field mate. That i something that you should research about.

[SpiroHrvoje1989]

@starsunlocked HEY! the USA is very good at golf!

[Alphatier86]

@kyoshiroma u mean they "always" lose in outnumbered against hugh superior allied Countrys... the US, the Russian, the British or the French can´t even win 50% of their wars against waaaaay inferior opponents...

[kyoshiroma]

@Alphatier86 Part of the "hability" to fight a war is to calculate, the power of your enemy. Coz at the end good or bad the most important things is win the war. For instance Japan choose US even they know it that were economically weaker than US industry, but for many reasons they clash and lose. Germany was exactly the same, it doesnt matter in war how "nice" or "hi-tech"are your weapons but to be good enough, cheap and realiable are vitals. The other aspect are just anecdotical

[88Scatter]

@kyoshiroma Aside from whatever you say, economic and industrial power also play a very central role in winning wars - especially massive ones.

[redreaper2020]

Achtung! Feuerstrahl!!

[BigAndTall666]

@AdamSavage88 go google!

[diramonsky]

That last bit of footage was stoleb from a tankbattle and has nothing to do with the panzerfaust. Just sayin...

[BigAndTall666]

@diramonsky YUP; Pershing vs Panther!

[Citzen92]

What a simple and deadly weapon..

[Lucke189]

When you think about it, WW2 Germany had so many great innovations.

I mean, the MP44, which was the first Assault Rifle, or their tanks that just out-powered the Allied ones in most aspects. This Panzerfaust, that wasn't only cheap and easy to produce, but also very effective. Not to mention their skills in rockets, with the V2 Rocket and all that.

I mean, for one nation, they were truly a force to be reckoned with!

[mixindave1]

i got a shit pipe.

[armysoldierant1944]

comment on pershing is correct...was not hit by panzerfaust

[petrwarry72]

that panther at the end was hit 2 times from pershing , in town koln/cologne

[SStotenkopfgruppen]

nice movie i got a panzerfaust 60m

[thafreeworld]

Panzerfaust is teh shit!

[mihaelmartinovic]

it isnt you fool!! The RPG 2 AND 7 were bazed on pazerfaust and rpg 7 is an more inproved version!!

[11251309]

alot of more !!!!!

[renshammar]

I love your great uncle. :)

[11251309]

You shouldnt be prove of it he kill allied i hope he died today