This is pretty darned awesome!
It's like a 3-D television set which doesn't require those cumbersome glasses (of course, it looks 2D on my screen) since
there's a screen on both sides.
I hope this is the first step on the road to inventing true 3D holographic images that don't have to be reflected off of glass or water mist!
Lonsoleil 1 year ago
Have to agree with Jay...no evidence of actual 3D here (either steroscopic or volumetric).
A static 3D model on the display which the camera then moves about randomly would show it.
(well, ok, that could still be headtracked, but to go to that level itself to fake it would be cool in itself :P)
twdarkflame 3 years ago
I'm still not seeing a sense of real 3D, it would probably help if it didn't have just one window on each side. Maybe it looks better in real life, who knows
JayKeaton 3 years ago 2
indead nothing better than the real stuff
epoxycine 3 years ago 2
This is pretty darned awesome!
It's like a 3-D television set which doesn't require those cumbersome glasses (of course, it looks 2D on my screen) since
there's a screen on both sides.
I hope this is the first step on the road to inventing true 3D holographic images that don't have to be reflected off of glass or water mist!
Lonsoleil 1 year ago
Have to agree with Jay...no evidence of actual 3D here (either steroscopic or volumetric).
A static 3D model on the display which the camera then moves about randomly would show it.
(well, ok, that could still be headtracked, but to go to that level itself to fake it would be cool in itself :P)
twdarkflame 3 years ago
I'm still not seeing a sense of real 3D, it would probably help if it didn't have just one window on each side. Maybe it looks better in real life, who knows
JayKeaton 3 years ago 2
indead nothing better than the real stuff
epoxycine 3 years ago 2