They interviewed a guy from the environmental movement who was also in the video Pickaxe. These anarchists get around. I'd never heard of the WTO or globalization until the battle in Seattle. A victory for the Left.
Anarchy is a nice idea but it wont work, there will be murders every day, and no one will stop the murderers, there will be killings and muggings and people will split into tribes and fight eachother, just look at afghanistan.
@TyrannisSicSemper I know full well how to protect my self you knavish rapscallion, I just am happy the way I am, its not perfect but its better then having people running through the streets doing what ever they want, be it rape or murder or looting, anyways whos going to work on roads when they break? whos going to work at the power plants? whos going to keep the water running? or the hospitals? When people dont have any incentive to work people wont work.
@OliieTheEpic Did you actually just call me a "knavish rapscallion" ..? I was impressed until you followed it up with the same old contrived argument about how you prefer a few creature comforts and trappings of so-called civilization.
The good news is, most of those things you mention have been privatized anyway and are no longer the domain of "government" exactly. That and/or suffering from such neglect as to barely notice the difference.
I didn't really question your happiness either ...
@TyrannisSicSemper Well alcohol does wonders to insults, but now that I think about it you are right, so thank you for your posts sir. It was a pleasure debating with you, I may not think full anarchism is right but we do need some freedom.
Anarchism might be the way to go, but we better send the niggers back to Africa and gas the rest of the Jews before we attempt it. White people are the only ones capable of handling the responsibility of freedom.
Rejected by the controllers, not rejected by the people. Multiculturalism has been forced onto white populations by jewish communists. (the same people who use idiot anarchists for their own ends).
@bmays002 Is there even such a thing as monoculturalism any more? I, for one, am both French and Portuguese. So should you gas me? What if I were of one nationality but nourish a strong affection for another culture (for example China)? People are different from each other, not only in personality but also in culture. That is something you have to accept, that societies are made of everything (at least nowadays).
Your a white European, in the face of white extinction there is no point in breaking it down further. Interest in other cultures is obviously normal and healthy. What i am against is obsession to the point of marrying a chink woman and having fucked up looking children that pollute Europe (or Asia for that matter). or simply rat like immigrants that out breed whites in white countries. This is all run by the jews as i see it. Non-whites are simply a weapon of the jews..
@bmays002 Bigots and brain dead people like you have no place in anarchism. NO SEXISTS RACIST OR BIGOTS ALLOWED. We should send you back to whatever Nazi planet you came from.
@ flaminglavaowl: It is obvious that you think that this usury banking world we live in can only be controlled by armies. You are wrong. If we all in every country took a stand against the banks, as one race: humanity, we could overthrow their system in one day. No violence would be needed, until they used the police on us. Which, technically they are peons subjecting peons. It's sad that people think we're savage, when it's these bankers and corporate slime who are. Inherently humans are good.
Last sunday, there was a small, non-violent, protest against closing of sosial center called "Satama" in Helsinki, Finland. Two protestors were arrested. Couple hours later Finland won the ice hockey world championship and thousand of people went to the streets, broked trafficsigns, swimmed on the fountains, stoled flag of the Finland from the president's castle (our "White House") and pissed from the house roof. Nobody were arrested.
I can see both sides of the anarchy arguement. But most people dont realize how hard it would be for them to surivive or prosper. Most of them think they know but they dont most of them havent seen or been to "war" or fight to survive.
@msiordie44 I don't think you know the anarchist arguments. Depends on what school you're looking at, but anarchism in general is "liberty". Therefore you could reasonably say that both schools of anarchy would exist, those being anarcho-communism and anarcho-capitalism. Thats the nice thing about anarchy, it's voluntary association. If you want to start a socialist or capitalist colony you can. You can also leave whenever. Theres various arguments as to why a militaristic state wouldn't form.
Anarcho-Punk (like in the movie SLC Punk) and CHaosism is retarded, Chaosism however is little better as its a post-workers fight destrctuion-selfsequence emancipationb.!
But ANarchism IS LEFT-WING Anarcho-CRapitalists are even changing name to Agorism bevcos ANarchism ahs NOTHING TO DO WHITH CRapitalism!
@MagnitudePerson Anarchism and Communism is the nearly-same thing, justk ick outtohse Stalinist fags and put more Trotskyists in, and Red Anarchism is a new time to radicalsie(e.i: REAL-Anarchists) ANARCHO-COMMUNISM FTW!!!!!!!!1111111111111111 Anarcho-Trotskyism is good too!!!
anarchy is stupid, you could see how well its doing in african countries, and how well it did during the dark ages, we need smaller government yes, but we still need a form of authority, every man for himself is fucking stupid. Anyways anarchy would never work because people would get together and create there own armies and governments and there would be paramilitaries and constant wars against eachother. It would be tribalism.
Destroy EVerything, It affects them, Their Mindless Possesions, their Shitty Land, that they STOLE from many people, wreck their shit, they cant touch us....
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
have no fear, 95% of these bearded dreadlock-wearing "revolutionaries" will be doing well-paid 9-5 jobs, bringing their kids to mcdonalds and wondering where they'll go for their holidays inside of ten years!
It's more of a slogan than anything else. I use it to hook people into the conversation that I use to explain the idea. More accurately, I suppose I could also say "Violence against property isn't violence in the traditional way that you think of the idea of violence." But, that's not good as hook because it's too long.
And killing cops changes what, exactly? Smashing the windows at least does some financial damage to corporations which may cause them to change their tune. It surely collapsed this meeting(in combination with other things).
And does any anarchist say they are standing up for "the People"? No, that's Marxist rhetoric. Anarchists incite people to stand up for themselves as happened at the Seattle riots. If they wanted to break the window, they would have. It was a peaceful protest atm.
I agree, at least they weren't violent with other people...but the amount of "damage" hardly makes any kind of dent in these huge corporations' piles of cash
That's true. But, the smashing of the windows in the riot is just one part of property destruction against corporations. Some "Green Anarchists" have had a pretty successful campaign using property destruction and other tactics against a company called Huntington because of it's animal cruelty. I could link you to an extensive report on it if you'd like.
This is an amazing documentary even if you do not agree with the people in it. Thanks for uploading this to help others understand these people before judging them.
Violence is the exertion of force with the intent to injure (psychologically or physically) or kill. (taken from wikipedia). Violence against property as you claim is generally called "vandalism".
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
The entrance music lasts forever... it started to get annoying after the first 13 seconds why make it last 6 minutes? An anarchist society is hippocritical in it's very name. Fight for liberty not for anarchy.
Which iiissss the purpose of government... to keep foriegn powers, corporations, and organized societies which arise naturally in human society (if you don't have a clear understanding of that you have downs) from controlling us and taking away our freedoms. Many of our current politicians have made the claim that freedom isn't free, but it most certainly is, people and organizations take it away. Government is or at the least should be the institution that insures our freedoms.
He says let's give them their space, and keep this a peaceful demostration, that means that there is a form of collective governance and as a result this WAS NOT by definition an anarchist demonstration because anarchy requires the lack of governance... People organize, people form themselves in societies, anarchy is as impossible a realization as true communism.
In my opinion that is absurd. Why would you want a middle-man (the gov't) who is known for murdering masses of people, lying to them, promising them things it never gives them, imprisoning you and your friends - to be in charge of your life?
That is insane.
There have been alot of tribes in the past (like now) who used 'war' to keep other individuals or groups from GAINING power over them. And that's how I think a society should behave.
Your being speculative and completely skipped over the fact that though you call yourselves anarchists you are not anarchists by definition and if you are planning to start a revolution shouldn't you all have a clear vision of what your revolting against, what will result afterward and generally where your headed? There is no unanimity is just unorganized chaos. I think anarchists are worse than marxists because at least marxists have peace, quality, and unanimity as their root motivators.
So you want tribalism where the weak get killed and its everyman for himself, paramilitaries at war with eachother for control and power, that's all government is. So you can never get rid of government because one group and armie will always get ahead and take control. So that's why we need small government and authority that is actually ran by the people instead of a select few. So yes we need authority, but authority we control.
so what are u going to do when a brigade of trained killers shows up on ur step. asking for ur spleen? u are going to die as all "rugged individuals" would in such a situation. u may not need a master but u need organization. and organization needs leadership. no getting around that. for as long as caeser has his legions,such will be the case. and its not so much a catch 22 as a call for leaps of creativity and intelligence. ... liberations happen in numbers.
Believe it or not. Perhaps you need a leader, but WE do not need a fucking leader, we can make decisions amongst ourselves, for ourselves. Learn some fucking responsibility and take care of your own life.
u sound like a pretty misguided. and possibly deranged person. what did i say to u that made u cures and spew venom over a old thread? my point was succinct and well thought out. no pie in the sky feel good nonsense in it. so what ur problem? oh.i see WE SIMPLY DISAGREE. ur a good example why anarchy is simply impossible if we want a sane from of human development to take hold. be at peace.
@skyjuiceification that's good. that's upholding free speech. i want a world of differences of opinion. my close friends and i don't agree on everything, yet we are friends. i believe if i have free speech then those that have speech i disagree with should as well. everyone thinking exactly the same thoughts would be boring. i want a rich and diverse social existence. and that is why i am an anarchist.
Believe it or not. Perhaps you need a leader, but WE do not need a fucking leader, we can make decisions amongst ourselves, for ourselves. Learn some fucking responsibility and take care of your own life.
nice piece of work :)
fringeaudioreads 1 month ago
They interviewed a guy from the environmental movement who was also in the video Pickaxe. These anarchists get around. I'd never heard of the WTO or globalization until the battle in Seattle. A victory for the Left.
TheForwardGaze 3 months ago
the cool thing is that in an anarchism, they could totally coexist. lol
the capitalists and the communists.
just don't do the communist thing if you don't like it.
darris321 4 months ago
What's that silly song called in this film?
The one all the krusty punk kids sing when they get drunk?
The chorus goes "like a pot of ... simmering stew!"
TyrannisSicSemper 4 months ago
Anarchy is a nice idea but it wont work, there will be murders every day, and no one will stop the murderers, there will be killings and muggings and people will split into tribes and fight eachother, just look at afghanistan.
OliieTheEpic 5 months ago
@OliieTheEpic
See, what you do is, you learn how to protect yourself loser.
Stop relying on others to do it for you. and yeah, people will continue to fight amongst themselves, like always.
They're people, they kill each other for stupid reasons every day since the dawn of time. deal with it.
TyrannisSicSemper 4 months ago
@TyrannisSicSemper I know full well how to protect my self you knavish rapscallion, I just am happy the way I am, its not perfect but its better then having people running through the streets doing what ever they want, be it rape or murder or looting, anyways whos going to work on roads when they break? whos going to work at the power plants? whos going to keep the water running? or the hospitals? When people dont have any incentive to work people wont work.
OliieTheEpic 4 months ago
@OliieTheEpic Did you actually just call me a "knavish rapscallion" ..? I was impressed until you followed it up with the same old contrived argument about how you prefer a few creature comforts and trappings of so-called civilization.
The good news is, most of those things you mention have been privatized anyway and are no longer the domain of "government" exactly. That and/or suffering from such neglect as to barely notice the difference.
I didn't really question your happiness either ...
TyrannisSicSemper 4 months ago
@TyrannisSicSemper Well alcohol does wonders to insults, but now that I think about it you are right, so thank you for your posts sir. It was a pleasure debating with you, I may not think full anarchism is right but we do need some freedom.
OliieTheEpic 4 months ago
@OliieTheEpic So let's drink to that! One rapscallion to another! cheers
TyrannisSicSemper 4 months ago
Does anyone remember that old British documentary about the WTO protests? What was that called?
veganjoshua 6 months ago
5:47 Zerzan?
miserbastard 6 months ago
Anarchism might be the way to go, but we better send the niggers back to Africa and gas the rest of the Jews before we attempt it. White people are the only ones capable of handling the responsibility of freedom.
bmays002 8 months ago
@bmays002 Poor attempt at discrediting an ideology by associating it with stupid and rejected-in-the-past ideals.
mainmenu895 5 months ago
@mainmenu895
Rejected by the controllers, not rejected by the people. Multiculturalism has been forced onto white populations by jewish communists. (the same people who use idiot anarchists for their own ends).
bmays002 5 months ago
@bmays002 Is there even such a thing as monoculturalism any more? I, for one, am both French and Portuguese. So should you gas me? What if I were of one nationality but nourish a strong affection for another culture (for example China)? People are different from each other, not only in personality but also in culture. That is something you have to accept, that societies are made of everything (at least nowadays).
mainmenu895 5 months ago
@mainmenu895
Your a white European, in the face of white extinction there is no point in breaking it down further. Interest in other cultures is obviously normal and healthy. What i am against is obsession to the point of marrying a chink woman and having fucked up looking children that pollute Europe (or Asia for that matter). or simply rat like immigrants that out breed whites in white countries. This is all run by the jews as i see it. Non-whites are simply a weapon of the jews..
bmays002 5 months ago
@bmays002 charming ... feel free to kill yourself scumbag. Pretty please? Aw come on ...
TyrannisSicSemper 4 months ago
@TyrannisSicSemper
mmmhmm, you should go live in Africa where there is no government, it is basically true Anarchy there so you should love it.
Lots of nigger animals running wild as well. If you are lucky a witchdoctor might use your organs in a soup to cure their aids. lmao.
bmays002 4 months ago
@bmays002 Bigots and brain dead people like you have no place in anarchism. NO SEXISTS RACIST OR BIGOTS ALLOWED. We should send you back to whatever Nazi planet you came from.
AusdemLicht 5 days ago
@AusdemLicht
why don't you go kill some cops, make yourself useful
bmays002 3 days ago
@ flaminglavaowl: It is obvious that you think that this usury banking world we live in can only be controlled by armies. You are wrong. If we all in every country took a stand against the banks, as one race: humanity, we could overthrow their system in one day. No violence would be needed, until they used the police on us. Which, technically they are peons subjecting peons. It's sad that people think we're savage, when it's these bankers and corporate slime who are. Inherently humans are good.
thatdamnpunk 9 months ago
Last sunday, there was a small, non-violent, protest against closing of sosial center called "Satama" in Helsinki, Finland. Two protestors were arrested. Couple hours later Finland won the ice hockey world championship and thousand of people went to the streets, broked trafficsigns, swimmed on the fountains, stoled flag of the Finland from the president's castle (our "White House") and pissed from the house roof. Nobody were arrested.
Fair isn't it?
Kaalifornia 9 months ago 2
(A)
RebellingGeneration 9 months ago
(A) (///) RED SKIN FOR EVER !
MARKO8885VTC 10 months ago
Completely awesome
So much respect to all the protesters
(A) from Denmark
SuperAcab666 1 year ago
I can see both sides of the anarchy arguement. But most people dont realize how hard it would be for them to surivive or prosper. Most of them think they know but they dont most of them havent seen or been to "war" or fight to survive.
msiordie44 1 year ago
@msiordie44 y wud we b fighting?
LAXluva27 1 year ago
@msiordie44 I don't think you know the anarchist arguments. Depends on what school you're looking at, but anarchism in general is "liberty". Therefore you could reasonably say that both schools of anarchy would exist, those being anarcho-communism and anarcho-capitalism. Thats the nice thing about anarchy, it's voluntary association. If you want to start a socialist or capitalist colony you can. You can also leave whenever. Theres various arguments as to why a militaristic state wouldn't form.
zoogle1 10 months ago
@skyjuiceification
an organisation doesn't need a leader
maybe a spokesman but no leader
only peoples working together!
one cause
no gods no managers
type :
french revolution (youtube)
it brought us ,europe, freedom (a bit of it at least lol)
mrej1234567890 1 year ago
mr babylon with your uniform on
come on to our side its more fun.
horlock91 1 year ago
I am a PROUD believer in Anarchism! Up this if u agree!
IAnarchia 1 year ago 41
Anarcho-Punk (like in the movie SLC Punk) and CHaosism is retarded, Chaosism however is little better as its a post-workers fight destrctuion-selfsequence emancipationb.!
But ANarchism IS LEFT-WING Anarcho-CRapitalists are even changing name to Agorism bevcos ANarchism ahs NOTHING TO DO WHITH CRapitalism!
MagnitudePerson 1 year ago
@MagnitudePerson Anarchism and Communism is the nearly-same thing, justk ick outtohse Stalinist fags and put more Trotskyists in, and Red Anarchism is a new time to radicalsie(e.i: REAL-Anarchists) ANARCHO-COMMUNISM FTW!!!!!!!!1111111111111111 Anarcho-Trotskyism is good too!!!
MagnitudePerson 1 year ago
@MagnitudePerson It's called "Insurrectionism"
destructicon500 1 year ago
anarchy is stupid, you could see how well its doing in african countries, and how well it did during the dark ages, we need smaller government yes, but we still need a form of authority, every man for himself is fucking stupid. Anyways anarchy would never work because people would get together and create there own armies and governments and there would be paramilitaries and constant wars against eachother. It would be tribalism.
FlamingLavaOwl 1 year ago
@FlamingLavaOwl No, that's not what Anarchism is.
destructicon500 1 year ago 3
Fail
dubified89 1 year ago
4:21 Did that cop just say "Fuck you"?
SupremeMaggot 1 year ago 4
@SupremeMaggot
He totally did!!
SkunkyAngry 1 year ago
@SkunkyAngry I thought so. :(
SupremeMaggot 1 year ago
Destroy EVerything, It affects them, Their Mindless Possesions, their Shitty Land, that they STOLE from many people, wreck their shit, they cant touch us....
War123Machine 1 year ago 2
Give these citizens AK47s!!
TheMaster926 2 years ago
if they want to use so, they will build some ;)
Nutzername36 2 years ago
im just wondering why are they so against WTO????
jesselakerr 2 years ago
zerzan is everywhere
gerwin0 2 years ago
FIGHT THE POWER!!!
JuggalocodeChile1988 2 years ago 14
viva la resistencia!
Hoch lebe der Widerstand!
Worldwide Resistance!
Krieg dem Krieg
War against War
Ya basta! a las barricadas, que se vayan todos
viva la anarchia -(A)-
MannoMagic 2 years ago 3
This comment has received too many negative votes show
have no fear, 95% of these bearded dreadlock-wearing "revolutionaries" will be doing well-paid 9-5 jobs, bringing their kids to mcdonalds and wondering where they'll go for their holidays inside of ten years!
cheapy2006 2 years ago
WOW u people need to do research before u post things about this. I was there and most of u people have it all wrong
broses456 2 years ago
I drink my own piss.
ElectricSexPants 2 years ago
nasty
mauriceh01 2 years ago
xD
lol
GloriaGore 2 years ago
Those peaceful protestors are a bunch of gimps.
colombian18 3 years ago
Violence against property isn't violence... then why call it violence?
UnhealthySalad 3 years ago 4
It's more of a slogan than anything else. I use it to hook people into the conversation that I use to explain the idea. More accurately, I suppose I could also say "Violence against property isn't violence in the traditional way that you think of the idea of violence." But, that's not good as hook because it's too long.
MississippiMosher 2 years ago
HAHAH can't break the window at 6:29...
What a bunch of pussies, this so-called documentary shows how weak these anarchist really are. They dont even kill any cops???
Here's a tip for all you pussies out there who think because you destroy something you are standing up for "the people".
1. Smear vasiline under yours eyes to avoid the affects of pepper spray.
2. instead of spray paint that can easily be painted over or scrubed off, try using concrete filler and tiles for stencils.
zombiejon 3 years ago
And killing cops changes what, exactly? Smashing the windows at least does some financial damage to corporations which may cause them to change their tune. It surely collapsed this meeting(in combination with other things).
And does any anarchist say they are standing up for "the People"? No, that's Marxist rhetoric. Anarchists incite people to stand up for themselves as happened at the Seattle riots. If they wanted to break the window, they would have. It was a peaceful protest atm.
MississippiMosher 2 years ago 2
I agree, at least they weren't violent with other people...but the amount of "damage" hardly makes any kind of dent in these huge corporations' piles of cash
Fragilexflame 2 years ago
That's true. But, the smashing of the windows in the riot is just one part of property destruction against corporations. Some "Green Anarchists" have had a pretty successful campaign using property destruction and other tactics against a company called Huntington because of it's animal cruelty. I could link you to an extensive report on it if you'd like.
MississippiMosher 2 years ago
R u serious Vaseline?! all that does it trap the pepperspray on your skin. It does not work.
broses456 2 years ago
This is an amazing documentary even if you do not agree with the people in it. Thanks for uploading this to help others understand these people before judging them.
brainphreak 3 years ago
did I hear someone say "violence against property isn't violence"? yeah, that would be a pretty absurd principle to base a moral system off of.
DeraJa 3 years ago
Do you understand what property is?
Solechnaya 3 years ago
I guess I don't. why don't you explain it to me.
DeraJa 3 years ago
I would love to. Property, by definition, is any one thing used to exploit something else. For example:
A musket may be used to take down a bison for food. By shooting said animal with the musket, you are exploiting the animal.
Solechnaya 3 years ago
and all forms of exploitation are wrong, and should be abolished?
DeraJa 3 years ago
Moralistically. Exploitation that harms other beings.
Solechnaya 3 years ago
Violence is the exertion of force with the intent to injure (psychologically or physically) or kill. (taken from wikipedia). Violence against property as you claim is generally called "vandalism".
brainphreak 3 years ago
thank you for putting it on youtube.
rOromfue 3 years ago
this is a very good documentary that i first saw in 2006. thanks for putting it up on youtube, it can be quite difficult to find.
deliriumlb 3 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
The entrance music lasts forever... it started to get annoying after the first 13 seconds why make it last 6 minutes? An anarchist society is hippocritical in it's very name. Fight for liberty not for anarchy.
Jackk516 3 years ago
Yes, the entrance music is annoying, when you say 'fight for liberty, not for anarchy' - well, I see them as 1 in the same.
Living under someone's boot is not my idea of liberty.
m0bi 3 years ago 4
Which iiissss the purpose of government... to keep foriegn powers, corporations, and organized societies which arise naturally in human society (if you don't have a clear understanding of that you have downs) from controlling us and taking away our freedoms. Many of our current politicians have made the claim that freedom isn't free, but it most certainly is, people and organizations take it away. Government is or at the least should be the institution that insures our freedoms.
Jackk516 3 years ago
He says let's give them their space, and keep this a peaceful demostration, that means that there is a form of collective governance and as a result this WAS NOT by definition an anarchist demonstration because anarchy requires the lack of governance... People organize, people form themselves in societies, anarchy is as impossible a realization as true communism.
Jackk516 3 years ago
In my opinion that is absurd. Why would you want a middle-man (the gov't) who is known for murdering masses of people, lying to them, promising them things it never gives them, imprisoning you and your friends - to be in charge of your life?
That is insane.
There have been alot of tribes in the past (like now) who used 'war' to keep other individuals or groups from GAINING power over them. And that's how I think a society should behave.
No gods, no masters.
I don't need anyone to liberate me.
m0bi 3 years ago 26
Your being speculative and completely skipped over the fact that though you call yourselves anarchists you are not anarchists by definition and if you are planning to start a revolution shouldn't you all have a clear vision of what your revolting against, what will result afterward and generally where your headed? There is no unanimity is just unorganized chaos. I think anarchists are worse than marxists because at least marxists have peace, quality, and unanimity as their root motivators.
Jackk516 3 years ago
We're not politicians or dictators with a party program that everyone must follow.
Anarchism is the revolutionary idea that no one is more qualified than you are to decide what your life will be.
People will organize their lives as they see fit with whom they want.
Anarchism brings everything into question, even continuing to live in 'mass society', some people may live more like tribes than as a mass society.
I can't predict what will happen nor, unlike politicians, give any false promises.
m0bi 3 years ago 4
So you want tribalism where the weak get killed and its everyman for himself, paramilitaries at war with eachother for control and power, that's all government is. So you can never get rid of government because one group and armie will always get ahead and take control. So that's why we need small government and authority that is actually ran by the people instead of a select few. So yes we need authority, but authority we control.
FlamingLavaOwl 1 year ago
@FlamingLavaOwl i prefer x calling Anarchy as "NO LAWS! But Rules!"
MagnitudePerson 1 year ago
@m0bi
so what are u going to do when a brigade of trained killers shows up on ur step. asking for ur spleen? u are going to die as all "rugged individuals" would in such a situation. u may not need a master but u need organization. and organization needs leadership. no getting around that. for as long as caeser has his legions,such will be the case. and its not so much a catch 22 as a call for leaps of creativity and intelligence. ... liberations happen in numbers.
skyjuiceification 1 year ago
@skyjuiceification
Believe it or not. Perhaps you need a leader, but WE do not need a fucking leader, we can make decisions amongst ourselves, for ourselves. Learn some fucking responsibility and take care of your own life.
m0bi 1 year ago
@m0bi
u sound like a pretty misguided. and possibly deranged person. what did i say to u that made u cures and spew venom over a old thread? my point was succinct and well thought out. no pie in the sky feel good nonsense in it. so what ur problem? oh.i see WE SIMPLY DISAGREE. ur a good example why anarchy is simply impossible if we want a sane from of human development to take hold. be at peace.
skyjuiceification 1 year ago
@skyjuiceification that's good. that's upholding free speech. i want a world of differences of opinion. my close friends and i don't agree on everything, yet we are friends. i believe if i have free speech then those that have speech i disagree with should as well. everyone thinking exactly the same thoughts would be boring. i want a rich and diverse social existence. and that is why i am an anarchist.
Pomeray8 11 months ago
Comment removed
skyjuiceification 1 year ago
@skyjuiceification
Believe it or not. Perhaps you need a leader, but WE do not need a fucking leader, we can make decisions amongst ourselves, for ourselves. Learn some fucking responsibility and take care of your own life.
m0bi 1 year ago
The message on the wall reads thus:
IF WE DO NOT QUESTION WHAT'S ACCEPTABLE...
WE LOOSE OUR RIGHT TO PROTEST....
WHEN THE ACCEPTED BECOMES QUESTIONABLE.
scopeophile 3 years ago 4
thab=nks for putting it.
otakuloco13 3 years ago