IF ATI wanted to make my card, it would be a card that focus's on FPS not Visual. You would get upwards of 300 to 1000fps but with low graphics (which no card does anyway). My card would be the ultimate "run the game smoothly" over "omg orgasmic visuals". A GAME IS A GAME and does NOT need to be realistic. Fin.
don't get me wrong, its not BAD to update the shit, but it shouldn't be the main focus. I was never a main focus back then for games to look more and more like real life. They just wanted to make a game that was fun to play. Today, they put "fun" into the secondary category where visuals used to be, and visuals is #1.
look at BioWare and their move on The Old Republic. THEY KNOW that FUN is better than VISUALS. And their game will showcase that fact (not realistic, stylized realism). The game is already being boasted as bigger than all of their previous games combined, and their old games were pretty big. I cant wait for it, and the great thing is, my friends who aren't computer nerds can play since they don't need to rush out and buy 1000 worth of new gear just to play it.
No, you can get 300 FPS... It's just totally useless since most monitors are built to display 60 FPS and you can't perceive anything much smoother than that..
I bought 2 ATI 4870 cards, AMD quad core 2.9, WD 250 HD, 4 gb DDR 2, SB Extreame gamer soundcard, Sony cdr/dvd/cdrw, Toughpower 1,000 w power supply, Thermaltake full tower gameing case all for around $1,100
They all talk about DX 10.1 while some of them haven't updated their comps for "5 years". Vista retailed in January 2007 meaning DX 10(and 10.1) wasn't capable of being done until 2007 meaning these guys are liars!!!
dudes if u wonna game at high resolutions you shouldint be looking at no shitty 4770.its a great card for 100$ no doubt,but for high resolutions,you better be looking at a gtx275 and above,who the fuck r they kidding.
not offending but nvidia is crap, AMD for ever AMD image quality>nvidia AMD memory architecture DDR 5>nvidia tell me... AMD has the lead in gta 4, with their 4870 x2 boosts max 60 fps with everything on maximum and res on max too.. even tho.. it is run by an I7 microprocessor but still.. ton of processor and no videocard is nothing.. Nvidia doesnt have dx 10.1 architecture support yet. Amd for ever. FREE HL2 DM AND LOST COAST.
that is all true but nvidia has the upper hand with crysis. but i do like both brands, its just i prefer phyz-x to DX10.1 as i don't notice too much difference
yeap, theres something special when you play crysis on a ati, I remember i played like at 30 fps but with tweaks i could make it run at 50, just disabled some crappy particles which appeared in the grass.
Either this people don't know what they are saying or paid to say it. They were willing to pay 300 to 600 dollars for a video card upgrade. It is true that if you pay that amount you'll get great framerates. They were suprised that you'll get good performance for 99 dollars but even before this card was priced at that amount they are existing cards that are priced similarly and well below the 300 dollar mark., offering decent performance. So what gives?
this is the fakest shit ever, dumb ass hoes, bahahahaha they all looked like they had no idea wtf they were talking about, "directx10.1? if it's newer why not right" bahaha
I have a 8800@9800GT, it's enough for me today, but I'm really impressed with ati's new technology, the 40nm cores with low power consumption. It's the future in videographics cards.
I changed from 775 to am2+ and I'm saving some money to get an AMD Ph II 720 940 or 955 BE, impressive records in Overclock!!
I never said I don't use it, I use it a lot, but may be in the future I'll upgrade it.
The market want us to buy every year new hardware, but this is not good, becouse there are more important things to buy. If you guys have money, just spend it but responsability.
Good choise for the future is performance+low power consumption+low prices= AMD ;)
lol, you can tell they were told what to say. There's only a select few amount of people who are actually willing to spend 300-500 dollars on a graphics card which is really only for computer enthusiast unless u actually need it for your line of work
He's got a point, the GT cards are legendary, but all good things come to an end. Screens are getting bigger and bigger, and the older cards just don't have enough memory to cope with that. You need at least 1GB to play the latest games, I'm using a 4850 X2 2GB, and that does the job for me.
And I forgot, I get 25 FPS average on all HIGH setting in crysis. And i can play every other game just fine on 1080p resolution on very high setting. THE 8800GT has been out for more than a year and half and its still competitive towards other cards, so theres no reason to upgrade.
You sir, or mam, are an idiot. I CAN play crysis on HIGH setting 1680 1050 no AA without ANY problems with my 8800GT. and buying NEW card and spending an extra $250 to play crysis on VERY high setting IS THE DUMBEST SUGGESTION EVER. 8800GT is $100.00 (if you know where to look, since its discontinued). The ONLY problem with 8800GT is the fan sound, which in most cases is the problem with EVERY recent video card. So sir please shut your pig face, and stop babbling like you know something.
why is AMD comparing their new card for a 2 years old card ?? it is unfair AMD should compare it to GTS 250 GTX 260 not the 2 year old card the 8800gt/9800gt
hmm i got a 9800gt and i can play the latest game without lag
$300-600? wtf what time period is he living in? were in a freaking recession. for me $200 TOPS. even at $200 i would wait and think about it. And if they cant make that GPU be good enough, guess what? I will wait.
Oh and i have an 8800GT, which still runs the latest games on everything high, or nearly high setting just fine. So ATi PLEASE make some affordable cards for the future that are better than 8800GT!
My friend has a 4870 that along with his Phenom II X4 2.8GHz CPU maxed Crysis out with 8x anti-aliasing, and it wasn't even lagging a lot, and then I told him for the best performace use 2x as there's too much geo in Crysis.
HD4850 and HD4870 is really affordably and kicks Nvidia in every single respect for that money. So today 8800GT is kind of bogus for the money as the red team delivers a significant punch for hat money.
While nVidia has PhysX I prefer ATI because overall it has simple Display Driver installation and separate Catalyst Control Center installation... With nVidia you must download the whole Driver Suite which takes resources... So for a Single Card Setup which I run I always choose ATI with Simple Display Drivers! ATI FTW!!!
Or just run PhysX on the CPU..... of course it'll be intensive, but whatever. It's a bunch of new innovations called quad-core and overclocking. Most games don't even max out a dual-core.
Plus AMD is working with Havok to cook up some GPU-based physics calculations too - so there is competition brewing in that areas as well. The Nvidia PhysX is kind of flawed too - there is times where the GPU-physX gets a significant performance drop compared to the CPU method as the GPU becomes a bottleneck.
Depending their CPU is not the bottleneck.
SeekerTruth2012 4 months ago
scripted
MissMan666 1 year ago
just how many "gamers" have 5 year old gaming pcs.
rayright15 1 year ago
Comment removed
rayright15 1 year ago
@ativus222
ЛОл Gamer не значит Entusiast,а Игральшик lol!
halfpol 2 years ago
What the fuck? They call themself "gamers", only invest <700 dollars? You kidding me?
nativus222 2 years ago
Ничего
halfpol 2 years ago
@nativus222 Yes, problem?
Until games become more demanding, I am not willing to spend tons of money for something that grows obsolete the next year.
Suburbankidd 1 year ago
These answers seem rigged imo.
DaemonAnt 2 years ago 2
lame video. sorry. so lame.
MovingUpp 2 years ago
I second this. That video was completely stupid.
disophisis 2 years ago
IF ATI wanted to make my card, it would be a card that focus's on FPS not Visual. You would get upwards of 300 to 1000fps but with low graphics (which no card does anyway). My card would be the ultimate "run the game smoothly" over "omg orgasmic visuals". A GAME IS A GAME and does NOT need to be realistic. Fin.
bastec666 2 years ago
well , if developers did not focus in making game realistic , then every game that we would be playing today will have the graphic of the first doom.
deadmanavir 2 years ago
don't get me wrong, its not BAD to update the shit, but it shouldn't be the main focus. I was never a main focus back then for games to look more and more like real life. They just wanted to make a game that was fun to play. Today, they put "fun" into the secondary category where visuals used to be, and visuals is #1.
bastec666 2 years ago
well , everyone has their opinion
deadmanavir 2 years ago
well, yeah....
look at BioWare and their move on The Old Republic. THEY KNOW that FUN is better than VISUALS. And their game will showcase that fact (not realistic, stylized realism). The game is already being boasted as bigger than all of their previous games combined, and their old games were pretty big. I cant wait for it, and the great thing is, my friends who aren't computer nerds can play since they don't need to rush out and buy 1000 worth of new gear just to play it.
bastec666 2 years ago
No, you can get 300 FPS... It's just totally useless since most monitors are built to display 60 FPS and you can't perceive anything much smoother than that..
cyborgtroy 2 years ago
bullshit ,, 8800gts is 60 buxx ,well its jus 320mb of gddr3 but im sure it perfoms same as 4770 ,, bull il go for 4770 cuz t eats less energy
bigdima3 2 years ago
LOLOLOLOL this is sooooooooooo staged
ninjaseven 2 years ago
Lol this looks really, really staged, but the 4770 is a great deal. Even I got one lol and planning on getting another one to set up crossfire.
Zayras7 2 years ago
500 dollars? That kid was smoking crack!
im1greatman 2 years ago
im looking for the best
GPU ever for the price of 0 pounds and 0 pence!
burberrybedroom 2 years ago
0 pounds and 0 pence ?
Just close your eyes and use your imagination.
There you see great graphics for free :o)
halo2pc 2 years ago
burberrybedroom you can suck my dick for that price
bigdima3 2 years ago
look out of the window XD
pyrotechnican24 2 years ago
I bought 2 ATI 4870 cards, AMD quad core 2.9, WD 250 HD, 4 gb DDR 2, SB Extreame gamer soundcard, Sony cdr/dvd/cdrw, Toughpower 1,000 w power supply, Thermaltake full tower gameing case all for around $1,100
Poco1997 2 years ago
fake -.-
They are talking just if they memorized something and trying to remember it.
AMD should start asking real gamers...
gla300 2 years ago
Comment removed
unknowndudewak 2 years ago
woooo AMD!!!! <3
Heartagramerz 2 years ago
They all talk about DX 10.1 while some of them haven't updated their comps for "5 years". Vista retailed in January 2007 meaning DX 10(and 10.1) wasn't capable of being done until 2007 meaning these guys are liars!!!
doghairr 2 years ago 2
There is a substantial difference between having dx10.1 and knowing about it.
If your going to pick on this ad, use a better argument (lord knows, there are many of them)
NPSF3000 2 years ago
I dont wanna sound eh hem ***ist, but theres a female, this is fake.
GundamTotema 2 years ago 7
@GundamTotema Shut up, females game.
RainbowRoan 7 months ago
Lolz @ DX 10.1 - couldn't be more obvious this is scripted.
dev0lution 2 years ago 8
dudes if u wonna game at high resolutions you shouldint be looking at no shitty 4770.its a great card for 100$ no doubt,but for high resolutions,you better be looking at a gtx275 and above,who the fuck r they kidding.
taker254isback 2 years ago
or 4870 x 2
maxsianforce 2 years ago
colistro 2 years ago
that is all true but nvidia has the upper hand with crysis. but i do like both brands, its just i prefer phyz-x to DX10.1 as i don't notice too much difference
ninjaseven 2 years ago
yeap, theres something special when you play crysis on a ati, I remember i played like at 30 fps but with tweaks i could make it run at 50, just disabled some crappy particles which appeared in the grass.
colistro 2 years ago
Either this people don't know what they are saying or paid to say it. They were willing to pay 300 to 600 dollars for a video card upgrade. It is true that if you pay that amount you'll get great framerates. They were suprised that you'll get good performance for 99 dollars but even before this card was priced at that amount they are existing cards that are priced similarly and well below the 300 dollar mark., offering decent performance. So what gives?
conyo985 2 years ago 2
2:20 BEAVER!!!!!!!!!!!
bitchslapper12 2 years ago 2
haha
Krichlov 2 years ago
this is the fakest shit ever, dumb ass hoes, bahahahaha they all looked like they had no idea wtf they were talking about, "directx10.1? if it's newer why not right" bahaha
unokilo321 2 years ago
i guess one lil piece a' fan would lower the price
madzane94 2 years ago
so wish they used that cooler that ati uses...that sexc one at the ending...
madzane94 2 years ago
I have a 8800@9800GT, it's enough for me today, but I'm really impressed with ati's new technology, the 40nm cores with low power consumption. It's the future in videographics cards.
I changed from 775 to am2+ and I'm saving some money to get an AMD Ph II 720 940 or 955 BE, impressive records in Overclock!!
strikerhiryu 2 years ago
if u wont use it can you send it to me? i hae a 8600gts256mb :(
skaterride2 2 years ago
I never said I don't use it, I use it a lot, but may be in the future I'll upgrade it.
The market want us to buy every year new hardware, but this is not good, becouse there are more important things to buy. If you guys have money, just spend it but responsability.
Good choise for the future is performance+low power consumption+low prices= AMD ;)
strikerhiryu 2 years ago
HD 4770 scores P8086 on vantage..
gamerL33T 2 years ago 2
The 8800s play Crysis fine. They're great cards. Just a slightly underclocked 9800 card.
FortunexenutroF 2 years ago
lol, you can tell they were told what to say. There's only a select few amount of people who are actually willing to spend 300-500 dollars on a graphics card which is really only for computer enthusiast unless u actually need it for your line of work
LiquidFriction 2 years ago
lol this is all staged
dunlrock 2 years ago 2
He's got a point, the GT cards are legendary, but all good things come to an end. Screens are getting bigger and bigger, and the older cards just don't have enough memory to cope with that. You need at least 1GB to play the latest games, I'm using a 4850 X2 2GB, and that does the job for me.
minimoke8394 2 years ago
idiots... graphics card looses about 80% of value in 3 year
its cheaper just to buy yesterdays tech,,, e.g u can get a 9600GT that will outperforme a 3870 for about £50
1337ASM 2 years ago
Comment removed
CRAKIZGOOD 2 years ago
And I forgot, I get 25 FPS average on all HIGH setting in crysis. And i can play every other game just fine on 1080p resolution on very high setting. THE 8800GT has been out for more than a year and half and its still competitive towards other cards, so theres no reason to upgrade.
deepakm 2 years ago
The 8800GT was a great card, yes, but it's reign came to an end.
worshipme213 2 years ago
But it will be remembered as a legend.
oc5nsli341nforce4 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
You sir, or mam, are an idiot. I CAN play crysis on HIGH setting 1680 1050 no AA without ANY problems with my 8800GT. and buying NEW card and spending an extra $250 to play crysis on VERY high setting IS THE DUMBEST SUGGESTION EVER. 8800GT is $100.00 (if you know where to look, since its discontinued). The ONLY problem with 8800GT is the fan sound, which in most cases is the problem with EVERY recent video card. So sir please shut your pig face, and stop babbling like you know something.
deepakm 2 years ago
Comment removed
deepakm 2 years ago
The card is now out in Newegg, get it while it lasts!
Yoda8232 2 years ago
why is AMD comparing their new card for a 2 years old card ?? it is unfair AMD should compare it to GTS 250 GTX 260 not the 2 year old card the 8800gt/9800gt
hmm i got a 9800gt and i can play the latest game without lag
maxnanabas09 2 years ago
um probably because they all have the same architecture, the only difference is the die shrink...
Feircejaguar 2 years ago
on what lcd 17? 9800gt sux
eduardxwx 2 years ago
The GTX 250 is the exact same card as a 9800. NVIDIA just renamed it to get some attention :P
8800 65nm > 9800 (8800 with a die shrink) > GTX 250 (exact same card as 9800)
Way to innovate NVIDIA :P
DeadFredVideo 2 years ago 2
lol. they just slapped a better fan on it =D
chaosrealm93 2 years ago
GTS 250 is renamed 9800gt/8800gt x
or X+ correct me if im wrong
maxnanabas09 2 years ago
Go see AMD's HD 4770 slide, it's hilarious.
worshipme213 2 years ago
Hehe, i've seen it, hilarious xD
DeadFredVideo 2 years ago
LOL............... this is an entry level video card ( for an excellent price!!! )
do the math stupid
defragen1 2 years ago
i will stil buy nvidia chipset rather than choosing ATI chipset
maxnanabas09 2 years ago
Your loss.
SSEi02 2 years ago
because you are dumbass
maxnanabas09 2 years ago
Compelling argument.
SSEi02 2 years ago
No, this is a mid-range card at an awesome price.
FortunexenutroF 2 years ago
oh i guess i was thinking
entry, high, enthusiast
and you were thinking
entry, mid-range, enthusiast?
w/e i meant mid range
and being at 40nm this is a create card for overclocking it probably to perform as good as a 260
defragen1 2 years ago
No, it won't perform that well. OC'd, it may perform a little better than a 4850, but certainly not in the 4870/GTX260 area.
FortunexenutroF 2 years ago
can see there acting, 10.1 to 10 for a real gamer has no difference if a cheaper card is more powerful.
hord 2 years ago
$300-600? wtf what time period is he living in? were in a freaking recession. for me $200 TOPS. even at $200 i would wait and think about it. And if they cant make that GPU be good enough, guess what? I will wait.
deepakm 2 years ago
Oh and i have an 8800GT, which still runs the latest games on everything high, or nearly high setting just fine. So ATi PLEASE make some affordable cards for the future that are better than 8800GT!
deepakm 2 years ago
well for your information the very card u have can be out performed by the 4770 for $99. the 8800 is a good card, but for 2 years ago
GamerGnome 2 years ago
My friend has a 4870 that along with his Phenom II X4 2.8GHz CPU maxed Crysis out with 8x anti-aliasing, and it wasn't even lagging a lot, and then I told him for the best performace use 2x as there's too much geo in Crysis.
Don't forget the 4870 is less than $200.
TheAssailant6661 2 years ago
HD4850 > 8800GT.
HD4870 > 8800GT.
HD4850 and HD4870 is really affordably and kicks Nvidia in every single respect for that money. So today 8800GT is kind of bogus for the money as the red team delivers a significant punch for hat money.
BorkaBonum 2 years ago
People who bought the 8800GT back then have no need for those cards. The 8800GT card still suffices for next generation gaming.
deepakm 2 years ago
While nVidia has PhysX I prefer ATI because overall it has simple Display Driver installation and separate Catalyst Control Center installation... With nVidia you must download the whole Driver Suite which takes resources... So for a Single Card Setup which I run I always choose ATI with Simple Display Drivers! ATI FTW!!!
NorthwindKazeTora 2 years ago 3
nice idea but not to hate on ati but if u want to get the eye candy [physx] just get the physx card i did its worth it only got it for 45$ brand new]
jack720ass 2 years ago
Or just run PhysX on the CPU..... of course it'll be intensive, but whatever. It's a bunch of new innovations called quad-core and overclocking. Most games don't even max out a dual-core.
TheAssailant6661 2 years ago
Plus AMD is working with Havok to cook up some GPU-based physics calculations too - so there is competition brewing in that areas as well. The Nvidia PhysX is kind of flawed too - there is times where the GPU-physX gets a significant performance drop compared to the CPU method as the GPU becomes a bottleneck.
BorkaBonum 2 years ago
OMG I been waiting for this!!! its in stores ? i dont see it in new egg...
radkilla 2 years ago