lol at that guy talking about Chryslers have good reliability because of his 1993 Jeep. Yeah back in the day they were good but the newer ones are crap
@datboiwes333 Actually you are incorrect. I have 3 and none have had any issues. I would say the new ones are almost as good as the old ones. It is called routine maint, follow it and will be no problems.
@girlafraid88 I own a Chrysler also and haven't had many problems, but vehicles like later model Grand Cherokees most of the Dodge lineup were known for being unreliable. Also they have laughably cheap interiors. I had a 2010 Sebring as a rental last year and the car had cheap, hard to the touch plastics everywhere. That interior wont hold up well over time. Chrysler is improving with their 2011 models however, the Imported From Detroit thing...
@datboiwes333 Thank god they started with the imported from detriot thing, it finally makes all of the crazy people who are obsessed with 'imported' cars look rediculous. If we all supported the country and stoped with the imported mabye thus country wouldn't be in such a mess. Mabye the plastics were hard touch, but they are exactly the same on all of the imports. I had a honda pilot that was so unreliable, cost a fortune and has hard plastic throughout, samw with the civics - really cheap.
This is the only Chrysler I've ever driven that I like, though I hate Chryslers in general. Had an 07 Nitro nd that was the worst car I've ever owned. This is by far one of nicest driving full SUVs out there. My dad has one and everytime I come back to the states I love driving it.
my parents hav 1 bought it brand spankn nu back n 07 wen it first came out. top of line model limited. hemi power. 4x4 jus like the 1 n the video but n dark gray. it has 16,000 miles on it n its a beautiful chariet, for their very first suv.
i work in the rentalbuisiness end most off the rentalcars are trash because people have no respect! lucky for you that you dont have too drive in a rentalmercedes!
when you buy any new car its always a risk too get no trouble !
a S-class is something else, i am talking about a C-class end YES the price is still too much- the risk also!
on a sebring there are more options standard!! end when you want a mercedes with alot off options you pay much money end ooo yeah... a star on the front. i have driven with a c-class end a sebring-- the sebring is much bigger!
Sebring is a piece of trash. I drove it as a rental. It had this annoying noise. Plus the breaks were bad, the quality and feel of the car was bad. In conclusion, CHRYSLER SUCKS!!! Because of Chrysler, Mercedes began to have poor quality. Now MERCEDES IS ON THEIR WAY TO THE GOOD OLD DAYS!!!!
We arn't interested in your uneducated opinion. Get the facts straight before leaving these comments, and for the record Chrysler is far better then any import, any day. Chrysler had nothing to do with Mercedes quality issues, it was in fact Mercedes that drove Chrysler into the ground, they are complete fools who are running that company. Bought Chrysler, ran it to the ground, sold it. All 100% true.
@skbuoy Of course they are better, have you ever driven one ? Drive an import with the shitty ride quality and then try a Chrysler, no comparison. Imports have no class, and who cares if they are better on gas, if you can't afford gas then don't drive.
No point is arguing, you can't know much about real cars.
@Aaron77wil dont give me that crap. toyota had some issues, but then again white people made this new into a big shit. toyotas are still best cars. i brought a 2011 camry last week
yeah because white people always buy those butt ugly ass cars that kill people and try to make up for by putting dumb ass youtube videos on the internet thinking that people would trust them again. go fuck off you don't know anything.
@skbuoy If you bought a camry , you know nothing about cars - toyotas are pure shit and no respectable person would drive one, I guess we know where you stand !
@girlafraid88 No! It was Chrysler that made Mercedes bad! Chryslers are peices of crap that are chug gas, and aren't well made. All imported cars are better than Chrysler. Like the 300, it's a copy of a Rolls Royce but horribly flimsy plastics inside, and yet the designers managed to make it an incredibly heavy car!
@AdrianC12345 Are you telling me the facts, I think not. I have far more resources then you and can promise you Mercedes is in fact what ran Chrysler into the ground, you can use this information as you see fit however it is actually what happened and has been documented eveywhere you look. There isn't a thing about Chrysler that I don't know and they did in fact manufacture excellent cars until Mercedes decided to play games. The truth shall never change.
@AdrianC12345 Most all of Chrysler's cars were goo, I have them from the 80's into the 90's and 2000's and every one of themhas been as excellent machine. Mer is a poorly run company, the man responsible for running this company at the time whey owned Chrysler is nothing short of a complete fool. Because of him the bankrupcy happened and quality suffered. The quality on their Mer products suffered also, however that was nothing to do with Chrysler.
@Aaron77wil I've seen them. They really don't look like that much of a change from current chrysler. The 200 even looks more plain and boring than the Sebring. Which it looks nearly identicle to. And only the 300 holds a bit of promise. But I will admit that if the new 300 is about as good of a car as the new Gran Cherokee than Chrysler will hopefully be on its way to making devent cars again.
@skbuoy You just are not understanding what I am telling you. First of all Mer were pieces of garbage well before they bought Chrysler, you wouldn't beleive the problems people were having with some models. Chryslers engines were always top, never any issues until Mer caused many people to screwed by defect engines, not to mention they declined almost all warranty work, the old Chrysler never declined any warranty work and was always easy to deal with. Look around for facts, you will find them.
too j40d-- do you realy think europeen cars are better? for my work i drive different new cars mostly europeen like mercedes,audi,bmw,vw etc they drive good but a sebring drives BETTER then a C-class. dont tell things if you have just your driverslicencens! mercedes has very bad complains end the S-class 320diesel is poor, always electronic problems. end the price is too much for what you GET!! that means also for bmw,audi end vw.
first let me say you lie. And the price is not too much for what you get. It cost Mercedes around $68,000 to build an s class, they sell them for about $87,000. Which means they make about $19,000 on each s class. It cost Chrysler about $12,000 to build a Sebring, and the sell for $23,000. Which means they make about $9,000 on each car. That proves that they are cheap, and that when it comes to a Mercedes you do get what you pay for, a nice car and the name. Neither with the Chrysler!
in my opinion, the exterior looks of most dodge chrysler and jeep cars look great. its only when you get inside it feels kinda cheap. but i think the exteriors of the cars look great!
I drive a Buick Enclave CXL, which is a little bit more money than this? So I can surely afford to buy this if I wanted too, but my question is why would I dumbass?. My comment was made because Chrysler has very cheap cars, and VERY plain and severely low quality interiors.
And your Buick is any better? Chrysler, GM, and Ford, all SUCK! If you enjoy driving a Canadian made re-badged lemon, be my guest. But if anyone ever wants a good car SUV or anything in between, find something from Japan or Europe. Even the new "Better" American cars are really designed by the Germans i.e. the Chevy volt was designed in Germany. I have a made in America 2008 Mercedes GL320 diesel, which kills any and all American SUVs.
Lol shut the fuck up, I can careless what you had to say since it had nothing to do with the aspen, let alone my comment? You drive a Mercedes? well good haha then all you paid for was the name, and a car that has horrible reliability, as I know from past experiences, get over yourself.
Mercedes has poor reliability because they are filled with advanced technology. GM has very poor reliability because they SUCK! What u get w/ a Mercedes is high quality; the name; the technology; and the resale value. What u get w/ a Buick is poor reliability; poor resale; low tech; and a brand synonymous with old men who where shorts in the winter.
Ok? That's why J.D powers has Buick as number one in dependability, and GM's Cadillac was rated number one with Lexus in customer satisfaction and Buick right after that? Stfu with shit that isn't fact, just your opinion. Don't comment me back either.
chryslers reliability is very good my 93 Jeep Cherokee has 215,860 miles on the stock motor nothing has been rebuilt and it still drives like a new car if that's not reliably than what is
I have a 1998 Chrysler Town & Country with 150,000 miles and NEVER HAD A PROBLEM. There is nothing wrong with that car......its the BEST car i ever had. My 2005 T&C with 66,000 miles never had a problem either!!
I'm thinking about a Journey......my neighbor loves his!!
lol just because you didn't have a problem doesn't mean its reliable. Overall they have the highest number of reported problems out of all other 21 top selling car companies. You can buy 10 Chrysler's every year for 10 years; and never have one problem. That still doesn't prove anything. Honda has the least number of problems reported annually out of all car companies.
if i dont have a problem with a car, that pretty much makes it reliable. My 1991 Plymouth Grand Voyager was perfect for 14 years and 200,000. My 1998 T&C with 150,000 is perfect. My 2005 T&C with 67,000 is perfect. By the way, when Chrysler & Benz were together, i remember reading from a Consumer Reports magazine, that a C-Class was rated lower than a Sebring for reliability. also it was what, $20,000 less?
I STILL HAVE THE ARTICLE, I'LL SCAN IT AND SEND IT TO YOU IF YOU DON'T BELIEVE ME.
Comparing a C-class to a Sebring is simply ridiculous. A C-class is a luxury sports sedan; with features like navigation, leather seats, RWD, traction control, disc brakes, just to name a few. All of the features listed above are NOT even available as options on the Sebring. Plus; I just checked, and the Sebring has one of the highest number of engine failure ratings due to unusual engine sludge buildup resulting in "catastrophic engine failure." Mercedes has no such warnings.
sorry for interupting. but a sebring has an opional navigation, standard anti lock b rakes, avialable leather seats, opional traction control. i think m-benz is still better. but hey, you were exagerating on a sebring. the sebring has less standard than mercades but how much cheaper is it?
Yea, my family had a 2000 Chevy Astro for about nine years with 100,000 miles with no problems & the Astro's reliability was rated well below average every year.
No my friend; Chrysler, Dodge, and Jeep all have poor reliability. The are in last place in terms of reliability out of a list of 21 top selling car companies. First place Honda then Toyota... 19th was Ford, 20th was GM, and 21st was Chrysler group.
Yeah, I wrote my comment before I had an experience with Jeep's "reliability." Step-father bought a brand new 09 Liberty. Within two weeks, fuckin' on-board computer is fried.
Despite the iffy interior, I think these are pretty under-rated as big SUVs go.
Too bad there won't be a redesigned model (the next Durango will be Dodge-only). Hope they make one that looks as appealing as the 2011 Jeep Grand Cherokee.
I really like this one too. I would say its right on par with GM suv's and is way better than anything you're going to get From Toyota....What does Toyota even have in this class? the Sequoia or whatever, yeah, huge splash that one made....
And you wonder why Chrysler is going bust yet again. Refinement and utility, Jesus f@":?<o Christ. It's the size of Montana, it barely, just barely does 13 mpg and it can't even get up a hill, so what is its purpose?
by the equipment provided, I think they are for ppl who bling, and pimp it out like a Caddy esclade. Look at the 115V plug! it's ready to fit useless 42" TVs, speakers and video game stuff in the boot so they can't put any luggage in.
Better than german SUV in design, exept the 'bmw X5, th VW Touareg, Porche Cayenne, Ford Kuga is so ugly! American atleast know how design of cars should be in many cases. Although this isn't the nicest example. My favourite SUV is the newest Lincoln Navigator, Nicest car ever must be 1959 Cadillac Eldorado and 1960 Chevrolet Impala. The 1960 Impala actually gets better/as good mileage than a Volvo V70 (1,3 mpg)
January 2008 Aspen 44000$ New. It is worth less then half that now (if you can sell it) December 2008. Next year...??? No matter what bling they put on it, IT IS a CHRYSLER People.
Once a Chrysler always a Chrysler. Spend a few extra bucks and buy Quality.
actually the aspen is a more luxurious version of a durango, thats why it costs more than the top of the line durango, and the quality of chrysler is great! i have a 2006 300 and the only thing that has gone wrong with is is a worn out bearing on the idler pulley.
read Don't laugh at this! Just do it Start thinking something you really really want cause this is astounding the person that sent this to me said their wish came true 10 mins after they read the mail so I thought what the heck You have just been visited by DrSuess's Cat in the Hat. He will grant you one wish Make your wish when the count down is over 10,9,8,7,6,5,4,3,2,1 MAKE A WISH Send this to 10 videos within the hour you read this. If you do, your wish will come true
Everyone does it with cars & trucks. Chevy Tahoe/Cadillac Escalade, Toyota Land Cruiser/Lexus LX, Ford Expedition/Lincoln Navigator, Honda Pilot/Acura MDX....and on and on....it's just how it's done.
Are u positive about the Honda Pilot/Acura MDX, cuz im not so sure about that because all i see them share or powertrains. My point was that GM use one platform and body for 5 brands and they're cars and call them selves "car designers". Same goes for Ford.
Absolutely positive, in fact the Pilot/MDX is based off the Odyssey minivan platform which itself is loosely based on the Accord platform. In fact all current Acuras are based off Honda cars. I agree with you on GM, but they all do it. Look at Nissan's FM platform and VQ engines, they put it in everything. The thing GM/most Americans do worse is they don't differentiate between the brands enough.
If there's a difference like the vans then the Aspen should be better. We had the Crysler van 2005 w/ the larger of the 2 engines for about 36k miles and we drove 2008 Dodge van for few thousand miles, the seats in the dodge gave me a back ache every time unlike the cryler and there many other small things which made the dodge version inferior to us. I guess be best to test them both.
your right, he sounds like he is being forced to speak as if he has a gun pointed to him. i showed my brother this same video and he said the excat thing you sail
Now tell some real Facts very late next year it is due to be Cancelled by Cerberus. The same plant that make the Durango I might add.I happen to live in what's left of the Detroit - Metro area. Though the Plant that makes it is not based here.
This is a pretty odd review considering most of the big guys say it is one of the least refined SUVs on the market and that it is less than impressive. . .
and this is why the american car makers are taking a giant duke. they fail to adapt and continue to employ plants full of people who make giant turds like this. then they shut the plants down and wonder, "whaaa happened?!?!"
chrysler aspen is better tougher and stronger than toyota sequoia and toyota land cruiser
maxthehulk 3 months ago
the 2007-2009 Chrysler Aspen was assembled in
Newark, Delaware, United States
Annihilator1111 6 months ago
i would love to see a 2012 version of the aspen on the new durango platform, that would probably be the BEST looking suv on the road:)
markmarshall39 6 months ago 9
@markmarshall39 I actually asked chrysler on their facebook wall, and they said there wasn't a confirmation on it yet, so it's very well possible!
cheesepie1011 4 months ago
@cheesepie1011 awesome, maybe it will happen, lets keep our fingers crossed:)
markmarshall39 4 months ago
Esa guagua esta cabrona yo la tengo praaa pero gasta gasolina pero es para dominguiar
toro1634 6 months ago
lol at that guy talking about Chryslers have good reliability because of his 1993 Jeep. Yeah back in the day they were good but the newer ones are crap
datboiwes333 9 months ago
@datboiwes333 Actually you are incorrect. I have 3 and none have had any issues. I would say the new ones are almost as good as the old ones. It is called routine maint, follow it and will be no problems.
girlafraid88 9 months ago
@girlafraid88 I own a Chrysler also and haven't had many problems, but vehicles like later model Grand Cherokees most of the Dodge lineup were known for being unreliable. Also they have laughably cheap interiors. I had a 2010 Sebring as a rental last year and the car had cheap, hard to the touch plastics everywhere. That interior wont hold up well over time. Chrysler is improving with their 2011 models however, the Imported From Detroit thing...
datboiwes333 9 months ago
@datboiwes333 Thank god they started with the imported from detriot thing, it finally makes all of the crazy people who are obsessed with 'imported' cars look rediculous. If we all supported the country and stoped with the imported mabye thus country wouldn't be in such a mess. Mabye the plastics were hard touch, but they are exactly the same on all of the imports. I had a honda pilot that was so unreliable, cost a fortune and has hard plastic throughout, samw with the civics - really cheap.
girlafraid88 9 months ago
@girlafraid88 yeah but a lot of American cars use a lot of parts from Japan also... The economy is messed up around the world not just the US.
datboiwes333 9 months ago
I like the man
coyotitaipod 10 months ago
The thing still looks like a mid-size.
SecularTechnology 11 months ago
They never want to mention that the 5.7 HEMI has 16 sparkplugs.
RaguelAngelofBalance 1 year ago
@RaguelAngelofBalance How is that possible? It has V8 so it should have 8 not 16.
GBraidi78 10 months ago
@GBraidi78 Believe me. My '89 Nissan pick up with the 2.4 4 cyl had 8 plugs. Intake and exhaust. To help with emissions.
RaguelAngelofBalance 10 months ago
@RaguelAngelofBalance I never knew that existed LOL, I take your word for it bro!!
GBraidi78 10 months ago
@GBraidi78 The wife has a 2005 Jeep Grand Cherokee with the 5.7....so, yeah, I was shocked too.
RaguelAngelofBalance 10 months ago
@GBraidi78 I have one too, it does have 2 plugs per cyl.
girlafraid88 9 months ago
@girlafraid88 Chrysler Aspen or something else if something else what kind of car is it?
GBraidi78 9 months ago
that Is my car and I love it! Great Luxury SUV
MauChaps 1 year ago
cant wait till i get mine on monday looks just like that one
daalpujr3 1 year ago
that suv look like a giant compared to him
therockandrollstar1 1 year ago
@therockandrollstar1 I think He is 5'-2"
MrSlicksnake 1 year ago
@MrSlicksnake oh lol
therockandrollstar1 1 year ago
god i love this suv
therockandrollstar1 1 year ago
OMG...I didn't look at the posted date and thought this was from 1990s.
DJTEVAdotCOM 1 year ago
0:00
JaSt321 1 year ago
this might be the replacement I'm looking for, to move up from my jeep grand cherokee limited.. (I've outgrown it)
mhatsko 1 year ago
DOES THIS THING HAVE A ROD ANTENNA?!
bg1379 1 year ago
I am a GM person, and always have been... but last year, I bought my wife an 09 Aspen, and have nothing but good things to say about it!
reeder77 1 year ago
It is sooo nice! too bad it was only produced for way too few years, was it 1 or 2 years?
CDTbossy 1 year ago
I used to like this car, but since I bought my Mercedes GL, the aspen is piece of shit for me !! lol
TheNasrii 1 year ago
@TheNasrii mercedes built this car ya dumbass
Aaron77wil 1 year ago
We have a fully loaded Durango but I wish my dad bought this car.
MUSlC1213 1 year ago
absolutely wonderful car. I own this along with a volvo xc90. go chrysler.
Kyle1996ish 1 year ago
holy shit, what a big car
youtunicu 1 year ago
When i was in S.F i rented it, so nice and good suv, i recomend it
MakINE16V 1 year ago
Dodge/Jeep/Chrysler>ford,gm products
MPLSTORM 1 year ago
This is the only Chrysler I've ever driven that I like, though I hate Chryslers in general. Had an 07 Nitro nd that was the worst car I've ever owned. This is by far one of nicest driving full SUVs out there. My dad has one and everytime I come back to the states I love driving it.
flatblackstrat 1 year ago
this car was a failure.
i like it though, but it ddnt come out at the right time...
jwatwater 1 year ago
Tha wheels are Flat :D
Kidrauhl96 1 year ago
it was only sold for two years, so it wasn't that great
somewhatlongdong 1 year ago
my parents hav 1 bought it brand spankn nu back n 07 wen it first came out. top of line model limited. hemi power. 4x4 jus like the 1 n the video but n dark gray. it has 16,000 miles on it n its a beautiful chariet, for their very first suv.
livz4speed86 1 year ago
looks like a cadillac ripoff to me.....in black the escalade and this thing looks similer...
gmman010983 1 year ago
whoa, you Americans call that truck something between a medium sized and a large suv?
it's a cool car and for a reasonable price, but I'm afraid it won't fit into my garage...
apache566 2 years ago
i work in the rentalbuisiness end most off the rentalcars are trash because people have no respect! lucky for you that you dont have too drive in a rentalmercedes!
when you buy any new car its always a risk too get no trouble !
teasy36 2 years ago
Comment removed
PunjabiShehenshaah 2 years ago
a S-class is something else, i am talking about a C-class end YES the price is still too much- the risk also!
on a sebring there are more options standard!! end when you want a mercedes with alot off options you pay much money end ooo yeah... a star on the front. i have driven with a c-class end a sebring-- the sebring is much bigger!
teasy36 2 years ago
Sebring is a piece of trash. I drove it as a rental. It had this annoying noise. Plus the breaks were bad, the quality and feel of the car was bad. In conclusion, CHRYSLER SUCKS!!! Because of Chrysler, Mercedes began to have poor quality. Now MERCEDES IS ON THEIR WAY TO THE GOOD OLD DAYS!!!!
skbuoy 2 years ago
We arn't interested in your uneducated opinion. Get the facts straight before leaving these comments, and for the record Chrysler is far better then any import, any day. Chrysler had nothing to do with Mercedes quality issues, it was in fact Mercedes that drove Chrysler into the ground, they are complete fools who are running that company. Bought Chrysler, ran it to the ground, sold it. All 100% true.
girlafraid88 1 year ago
Chrslyer is far better than any import? In what way you educated idiot?
skbuoy 1 year ago
@skbuoy Of course they are better, have you ever driven one ? Drive an import with the shitty ride quality and then try a Chrysler, no comparison. Imports have no class, and who cares if they are better on gas, if you can't afford gas then don't drive.
No point is arguing, you can't know much about real cars.
girlafraid88 1 year ago
@skbuoy the cars that they make aren't killing people like toyota and lexus.
Aaron77wil 1 year ago
@Aaron77wil dont give me that crap. toyota had some issues, but then again white people made this new into a big shit. toyotas are still best cars. i brought a 2011 camry last week
skbuoy 1 year ago
Comment removed
Aaron77wil 1 year ago
Comment removed
Aaron77wil 1 year ago
yeah because white people always buy those butt ugly ass cars that kill people and try to make up for by putting dumb ass youtube videos on the internet thinking that people would trust them again. go fuck off you don't know anything.
Aaron77wil 1 year ago
@Aaron77wil If your referring to this vehicle, go buy yourself a toyota and then see how long you will live !
girlafraid88 9 months ago
@skbuoy If you bought a camry , you know nothing about cars - toyotas are pure shit and no respectable person would drive one, I guess we know where you stand !
girlafraid88 9 months ago 3
@girlafraid88 agree with you, but a Sebring but not Camry
thegmcar 9 months ago
@skbuoy and you said educated enstead of uneducated
Aaron77wil 1 year ago
@girlafraid88 No! It was Chrysler that made Mercedes bad! Chryslers are peices of crap that are chug gas, and aren't well made. All imported cars are better than Chrysler. Like the 300, it's a copy of a Rolls Royce but horribly flimsy plastics inside, and yet the designers managed to make it an incredibly heavy car!
AdrianC12345 1 year ago
@AdrianC12345 Are you telling me the facts, I think not. I have far more resources then you and can promise you Mercedes is in fact what ran Chrysler into the ground, you can use this information as you see fit however it is actually what happened and has been documented eveywhere you look. There isn't a thing about Chrysler that I don't know and they did in fact manufacture excellent cars until Mercedes decided to play games. The truth shall never change.
girlafraid88 1 year ago
@girlafraid88 Really? What great cars did chrysler have? How would a company bought by another ruin the owner company?
AdrianC12345 1 year ago
@AdrianC12345 Most all of Chrysler's cars were goo, I have them from the 80's into the 90's and 2000's and every one of themhas been as excellent machine. Mer is a poorly run company, the man responsible for running this company at the time whey owned Chrysler is nothing short of a complete fool. Because of him the bankrupcy happened and quality suffered. The quality on their Mer products suffered also, however that was nothing to do with Chrysler.
girlafraid88 1 year ago
@AdrianC12345 check out the 2011 chrysler 200 and 300 you'll change your mind completely
Aaron77wil 1 year ago
@Aaron77wil I've seen them. They really don't look like that much of a change from current chrysler. The 200 even looks more plain and boring than the Sebring. Which it looks nearly identicle to. And only the 300 holds a bit of promise. But I will admit that if the new 300 is about as good of a car as the new Gran Cherokee than Chrysler will hopefully be on its way to making devent cars again.
AdrianC12345 1 year ago
@girlafraid88 right on that's true
Aaron77wil 1 year ago
@skbuoy Mercedes is a terribly run comapny, Now Chrysler is back on track - not the other way around.
girlafraid88 1 year ago
@girlafraid88 really? because chrysler is doing terrible, losing money and potentially going to go out of biz, however mercedes is doing just fine
skbuoy 1 year ago
@skbuoy You just are not understanding what I am telling you. First of all Mer were pieces of garbage well before they bought Chrysler, you wouldn't beleive the problems people were having with some models. Chryslers engines were always top, never any issues until Mer caused many people to screwed by defect engines, not to mention they declined almost all warranty work, the old Chrysler never declined any warranty work and was always easy to deal with. Look around for facts, you will find them.
girlafraid88 1 year ago
@skbuoy chrysler is never going to go out of biz get your facts straight you shit head
Aaron77wil 1 year ago
@skbuoy Beauty fades, dumb is forever.
girlafraid88 9 months ago
too j40d-- do you realy think europeen cars are better? for my work i drive different new cars mostly europeen like mercedes,audi,bmw,vw etc they drive good but a sebring drives BETTER then a C-class. dont tell things if you have just your driverslicencens! mercedes has very bad complains end the S-class 320diesel is poor, always electronic problems. end the price is too much for what you GET!! that means also for bmw,audi end vw.
teasy36 2 years ago
first let me say you lie. And the price is not too much for what you get. It cost Mercedes around $68,000 to build an s class, they sell them for about $87,000. Which means they make about $19,000 on each s class. It cost Chrysler about $12,000 to build a Sebring, and the sell for $23,000. Which means they make about $9,000 on each car. That proves that they are cheap, and that when it comes to a Mercedes you do get what you pay for, a nice car and the name. Neither with the Chrysler!
J40d 2 years ago
in my opinion, the exterior looks of most dodge chrysler and jeep cars look great. its only when you get inside it feels kinda cheap. but i think the exteriors of the cars look great!
encino78 2 years ago
Chrysler makes horrible cars, and very cheap. Look at the interior! I don't like them at all, and Ford is the same.
fp3shb 2 years ago
Don't hate what you can't afford.
th3ha1og0d 2 years ago
I drive a Buick Enclave CXL, which is a little bit more money than this? So I can surely afford to buy this if I wanted too, but my question is why would I dumbass?. My comment was made because Chrysler has very cheap cars, and VERY plain and severely low quality interiors.
fp3shb 2 years ago
And your Buick is any better? Chrysler, GM, and Ford, all SUCK! If you enjoy driving a Canadian made re-badged lemon, be my guest. But if anyone ever wants a good car SUV or anything in between, find something from Japan or Europe. Even the new "Better" American cars are really designed by the Germans i.e. the Chevy volt was designed in Germany. I have a made in America 2008 Mercedes GL320 diesel, which kills any and all American SUVs.
J40d 2 years ago
Lol shut the fuck up, I can careless what you had to say since it had nothing to do with the aspen, let alone my comment? You drive a Mercedes? well good haha then all you paid for was the name, and a car that has horrible reliability, as I know from past experiences, get over yourself.
fp3shb 2 years ago
Mercedes has poor reliability because they are filled with advanced technology. GM has very poor reliability because they SUCK! What u get w/ a Mercedes is high quality; the name; the technology; and the resale value. What u get w/ a Buick is poor reliability; poor resale; low tech; and a brand synonymous with old men who where shorts in the winter.
J40d 2 years ago
Ok? That's why J.D powers has Buick as number one in dependability, and GM's Cadillac was rated number one with Lexus in customer satisfaction and Buick right after that? Stfu with shit that isn't fact, just your opinion. Don't comment me back either.
fp3shb 2 years ago
All Mercedes were poor, but they are improving now, according to Consumer Reports. Most of them are now average.
rnorred86 2 years ago
YOU'RE STUPID
th3ha1og0d 2 years ago
thats a really plain interior. thats why i love my 08 GX
smartkid1985 2 years ago
come on its suck....
go home man...
therock701 2 years ago
chryslers reliability is very good my 93 Jeep Cherokee has 215,860 miles on the stock motor nothing has been rebuilt and it still drives like a new car if that's not reliably than what is
jeepluv76 2 years ago 8
That's only because Chrysler put Jeep at the head of the company. Chrysler and Dodge cars got the shaft and have shit reliability
stopxthisxfall 2 years ago
FALSE!!
I have a 1998 Chrysler Town & Country with 150,000 miles and NEVER HAD A PROBLEM. There is nothing wrong with that car......its the BEST car i ever had. My 2005 T&C with 66,000 miles never had a problem either!!
I'm thinking about a Journey......my neighbor loves his!!
Chrysler1998 2 years ago
lol just because you didn't have a problem doesn't mean its reliable. Overall they have the highest number of reported problems out of all other 21 top selling car companies. You can buy 10 Chrysler's every year for 10 years; and never have one problem. That still doesn't prove anything. Honda has the least number of problems reported annually out of all car companies.
J40d 2 years ago
if i dont have a problem with a car, that pretty much makes it reliable. My 1991 Plymouth Grand Voyager was perfect for 14 years and 200,000. My 1998 T&C with 150,000 is perfect. My 2005 T&C with 67,000 is perfect. By the way, when Chrysler & Benz were together, i remember reading from a Consumer Reports magazine, that a C-Class was rated lower than a Sebring for reliability. also it was what, $20,000 less?
I STILL HAVE THE ARTICLE, I'LL SCAN IT AND SEND IT TO YOU IF YOU DON'T BELIEVE ME.
Chrysler1998 2 years ago
Comparing a C-class to a Sebring is simply ridiculous. A C-class is a luxury sports sedan; with features like navigation, leather seats, RWD, traction control, disc brakes, just to name a few. All of the features listed above are NOT even available as options on the Sebring. Plus; I just checked, and the Sebring has one of the highest number of engine failure ratings due to unusual engine sludge buildup resulting in "catastrophic engine failure." Mercedes has no such warnings.
J40d 2 years ago 2
sorry for interupting. but a sebring has an opional navigation, standard anti lock b rakes, avialable leather seats, opional traction control. i think m-benz is still better. but hey, you were exagerating on a sebring. the sebring has less standard than mercades but how much cheaper is it?
vipermoon64 2 years ago
Yea, my family had a 2000 Chevy Astro for about nine years with 100,000 miles with no problems & the Astro's reliability was rated well below average every year.
rnorred86 2 years ago
No my friend; Chrysler, Dodge, and Jeep all have poor reliability. The are in last place in terms of reliability out of a list of 21 top selling car companies. First place Honda then Toyota... 19th was Ford, 20th was GM, and 21st was Chrysler group.
J40d 2 years ago
Yeah, I wrote my comment before I had an experience with Jeep's "reliability." Step-father bought a brand new 09 Liberty. Within two weeks, fuckin' on-board computer is fried.
stopxthisxfall 2 years ago
Chrysler Dodge trucks are the most reliable trucks you can buy
MPLSTORM 1 year ago
@MPLSTORM ha wow That's the biggest bullshit I've ever heard.
olverafam 1 year ago
I didn't say cars I said trucks. Jeeps and Dodges are indeed the most reliable, I own Fords and GMs and I will tell you that!
MPLSTORM 1 year ago
@MPLSTORM i agree i have had a ram for 6 years and it has 375,466 miles on it with the same motor there pretty good trucks.
Aaron77wil 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Rebadged Durango epic FAIL.
IndefinateOutcomes 2 years ago
get laid...
spreckops 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
offer your mother or sister
IndefinateOutcomes 2 years ago
Despite the iffy interior, I think these are pretty under-rated as big SUVs go.
Too bad there won't be a redesigned model (the next Durango will be Dodge-only). Hope they make one that looks as appealing as the 2011 Jeep Grand Cherokee.
TheNewMrCool 2 years ago 3
I own one of these and coming off of GMC, Denali and Envoy and my 3 cadillacs, I love this suv
cigarmikey1 2 years ago 10
I really like this one too. I would say its right on par with GM suv's and is way better than anything you're going to get From Toyota....What does Toyota even have in this class? the Sequoia or whatever, yeah, huge splash that one made....
stuwip839 2 years ago 3
I have actually never heard these guys talk bad about a single car they have covered!
althafs 2 years ago 3
And you wonder why Chrysler is going bust yet again. Refinement and utility, Jesus f@":?<o Christ. It's the size of Montana, it barely, just barely does 13 mpg and it can't even get up a hill, so what is its purpose?
87FranZ 2 years ago
by the equipment provided, I think they are for ppl who bling, and pimp it out like a Caddy esclade. Look at the 115V plug! it's ready to fit useless 42" TVs, speakers and video game stuff in the boot so they can't put any luggage in.
TangoR34 2 years ago
You don't want a chrysler...
horrorfreak889 2 years ago
are all chyslers/dodges,jeep's that bad?If so whats so bad about them all
chrisiztheman1618 2 years ago
everything
horrorfreak889 2 years ago
essentially I guess this is meant to be Chrysler's answer to the Lincoln Navigator and Cadillac Escalade in marketing terms
iainthornton 3 years ago
I would much rather try out the new Borrego with the V8.
PROgoth121 3 years ago
that thing looks like its from 1999 not 2009
VIRAJ818 2 years ago 2
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Nah, I don't think so. But whatever. Kia still wins over Chrysler because Chryslers reliability and quality has been suffering for quite awhile now.
PROgoth121 2 years ago
hahahahaha,
NoRednecks 2 years ago
this one is big lol
baipc1983 3 years ago
Ugly,Uglyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyy.USa cars are uglyyyyyyyyyyyy
alansilvestri 3 years ago
Better than german SUV in design, exept the 'bmw X5, th VW Touareg, Porche Cayenne, Ford Kuga is so ugly! American atleast know how design of cars should be in many cases. Although this isn't the nicest example. My favourite SUV is the newest Lincoln Navigator, Nicest car ever must be 1959 Cadillac Eldorado and 1960 Chevrolet Impala. The 1960 Impala actually gets better/as good mileage than a Volvo V70 (1,3 mpg)
CDTbossy 3 years ago
terrible piece of American crap
jarzadze 3 years ago 2
January 2008 Aspen 44000$ New. It is worth less then half that now (if you can sell it) December 2008. Next year...??? No matter what bling they put on it, IT IS a CHRYSLER People.
Once a Chrysler always a Chrysler. Spend a few extra bucks and buy Quality.
powerhouse2112 3 years ago 2
Does it have a low gear?
buickboy92 3 years ago
yes it does
gfudge76 3 years ago
Thanks
buickboy92 3 years ago
My brother has this truck and I was surprised with the build quality. It's up there with the Escalades and Lincolns.
Charles2337 3 years ago 2
CHRYSLER IS NOT BAD
VintageChevyCamaro 3 years ago 3
excellent
VintageChevyCamaro 3 years ago
actually the aspen is a more luxurious version of a durango, thats why it costs more than the top of the line durango, and the quality of chrysler is great! i have a 2006 300 and the only thing that has gone wrong with is is a worn out bearing on the idler pulley.
Hawkskill818 3 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
This car is junk don't buy it!
DrCadillacV 3 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
that man must have not saw the ford expeditions 3rd row seat. and fords interior is nicer
parkeredge 3 years ago
Not as nice as the X5
anatainu 3 years ago
BMW has nothing in the Aspen class of suv.
blackdubsociety 3 years ago
the only thing good about the Aspen/Durango cheap
crazyloc187123 3 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
WoWmaster101 3 years ago
im sure itd yield AT LEAST 25mpg, if it were driven right. most ppl dont know how to drive though. im getting 45mpg in my non hybrid civic btw.
ihavesomethingforyou 3 years ago
it would proably do better if it wasen't a full time awd
rangerover06sc 3 years ago
this is soo heavily biased by chrysler
fuzzzymaine2 3 years ago 3
Great suv, i had an 06 300c now i have an 08 aspen great upgrade. if you can afford one who cares about gas. remember you gotta get a Hemi...
omegaprofclean 3 years ago 6
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Try The New 2009 Kia Borrego
Muriness1 3 years ago
18 mpg is dat all omg us europeans would have a heart attack nearly all our cars are 30mpg 2 55mpg
onzlot92 3 years ago
We need some of those cars over here cuz 18 MPG Is BS
Muriness1 3 years ago
but in europe there also cars that only get 10mpg there as well
rangerover06sc 3 years ago 2
yes but they are usually expensive
onzlot92 3 years ago
lamborghinis 10/16
smartkid1985 3 years ago
depending on how they are driven
rangerover06sc 3 years ago
the interior is PPPPLLLLAAAAIIINNN!
smartkid1985 3 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
And horrible quality.
TheJabHattEnt 3 years ago
The Mercedes-Benz GL550 have lot of plastic in it's interior, also!
BklynJayL 3 years ago
this car is garbage. especially inside all plastic. plus spends lot of gas... its a fact europeans make much better cars.
tarikboss 3 years ago
I liked the old durango better.
GhostofRazors 3 years ago
Whats up with the reviewer? Sounds like he's reciting his lines...
Nice looking truck though...
redboyj15 3 years ago
i mean said
smartkid1985 3 years ago
Sharing platforms and bodies is just so plain. I mean how the its also use as a Dodge Durango.
MaxPayne19146 3 years ago
Everyone does it with cars & trucks. Chevy Tahoe/Cadillac Escalade, Toyota Land Cruiser/Lexus LX, Ford Expedition/Lincoln Navigator, Honda Pilot/Acura MDX....and on and on....it's just how it's done.
ageasaywhat 3 years ago
Are u positive about the Honda Pilot/Acura MDX, cuz im not so sure about that because all i see them share or powertrains. My point was that GM use one platform and body for 5 brands and they're cars and call them selves "car designers". Same goes for Ford.
MaxPayne19146 3 years ago
Absolutely positive, in fact the Pilot/MDX is based off the Odyssey minivan platform which itself is loosely based on the Accord platform. In fact all current Acuras are based off Honda cars. I agree with you on GM, but they all do it. Look at Nissan's FM platform and VQ engines, they put it in everything. The thing GM/most Americans do worse is they don't differentiate between the brands enough.
ageasaywhat 3 years ago
If there's a difference like the vans then the Aspen should be better. We had the Crysler van 2005 w/ the larger of the 2 engines for about 36k miles and we drove 2008 Dodge van for few thousand miles, the seats in the dodge gave me a back ache every time unlike the cryler and there many other small things which made the dodge version inferior to us. I guess be best to test them both.
VRWCcapitalist 3 years ago
your right, he sounds like he is being forced to speak as if he has a gun pointed to him. i showed my brother this same video and he said the excat thing you sail
smartkid1985 3 years ago 2
the aspen is ok though but never liked chrysler
bimmer881 3 years ago
Now tell some real Facts very late next year it is due to be Cancelled by Cerberus. The same plant that make the Durango I might add.I happen to live in what's left of the Detroit - Metro area. Though the Plant that makes it is not based here.
paulstewartcrane 3 years ago
the aspen is ok but an tahoe ltz or a denali is a better buy.
daeladub 3 years ago 5
the sequia is way better cause its japanise heck even ma Infiniti Qx56 is better
aku181 3 years ago
Suprised by a good review of this truck
notthehulk442 3 years ago 5
This has been flagged as spam show
AMERICANS CANT MAKE CARS!
sidekick3iskool 3 years ago
I want one..
kayyouman 3 years ago
booorrrrriiiinnnnnggggg
jpersing2007 3 years ago
these guys are located in virginia?
belmontst 3 years ago
This is a pretty odd review considering most of the big guys say it is one of the least refined SUVs on the market and that it is less than impressive. . .
bg1379 3 years ago
and this is why the american car makers are taking a giant duke. they fail to adapt and continue to employ plants full of people who make giant turds like this. then they shut the plants down and wonder, "whaaa happened?!?!"
sdijnfpo0jaisf 3 years ago
I totally agree mate...mammoth cars just don't do anymore..
ratonL 3 years ago
kooooooooooool
wassup123abc 3 years ago