Mike Gallagher speaks at the 9-11 Rally of Remembrance

[fivequotes]

so unussual but it's kinda amazing…

[Reinseug]

No Teenskate, you are the one out of touch, not Mike Gallagher. You are the enemy from within America's borders and Mike and those who agree with him are the True Patriots. Now pack your bags and move to the middle east where you belong!

[Teenskate]

Mike Gallagher is one out of touch freaking idiot.

[signawp]

He is putting a solution out there. You are just name calling to try to draw attention away from that solution. OO -oo using the race-card, calling him racist because he wants to profile a narrower class of people getting onto airplanes, and lately, the only class of people who have been blowing them up. What part of all this do you not get? Expand, dude. because you are narrow in your thinking.

[signawp]

So, we are ALL profiled, to keep certain peoples' feelings from being hurt. That is inefficient as well. It is called debate. Gets all sides out there, so solutions, efficient ones, not stupid ones which resulted from squashed debate (your attempt), are implemented.

[signawp]

Debate. He is getting debate out there. Pounding the point that the only people who have been blowing up planes are... by golly, Muslims! Yeah. He is right on there. As others have pointed out, there are converts who are not named Abdul, rare, but there, who can slip past general screening if people from countries overloaded with muslim extremists are the only ones concentrated all.

[signawp]

When you are stupid, it's forever. The Great Nina Koshetz.

[signawp]

Pharmeceutical companies lost billions in research and development before they focused on those with the knowledge to point out the plants that would narrow the search and yield the compounds that would aid in treating disease. etc., so the searches wouldn't be useless and research dollars could be used more effectively; the efficient allocation of scarce resources.

I got his point. I got the others' points, too.

[rmccay88]

@signawp

He wasn't taken out of context. He thinks racial profiling should happen and he said it repeatedly "who are you worrying about offending?" Forget that it is against the law....that is his position and he pounded it home throughout the interview. Furthermore, he has stated it on his radio show unequivocally before as well. Neocons like him use fear mongering as a excuse to hand over more power and control to the government so they can police the world and spy unlawfully here at home.

[signawp]

@rmccay88 Hate Crimes, Profiling... So what. I love the mentality of folks like you who want to scream hysterically, "ha ha, my heinous crime is worse than yours is, because of my racial profile, and my sexual profile, etc...." Cracks me up. Profiling is used all the time. Profiling is necessary, but not sufficient in itself, to keep terrorists off planes.

[rmccay88]

@signawp

"So what?" My mentality has to do with the rule of law, something the Bush and Obama administration could care less about. That entire statement you just said is the most absurd literature I have ever read. For you or anyone else who justifies illegal profiling shows how less you could care about the government obeying the law.

[signawp]

@rmccay88 Affirmative action... racial profiling.

[signawp]

His point was narrowing the screening for potential threats -- i.e., search for the gorilla if that is who you are searching for.

Like Ethnobotany-types targeting people with TBK (traditional Botanical Knowledge) to search for potential compounds in plants to target illness.

He got more narrow as the arguments got stronger. He argues like lots of people I know! He popped in the VIP line thing as things got more polemic and vocal. Do it like El Al.

[ytsqueezer]

More brave people like Robert Spencer, Pamela Geller and Mike Gallagher are desperately needed throughout Europe, Americas and Oceania.

[rmccay88]

@ytsqueezer

Gallagher is not brave, he is a Neocon chicken hawk. He thinks that we should have separate lines at airports in America just for Muslims and that anybody who was criticizing Bush should be imprisoned. That's what a call a lunatic

[signawp]

@rmccay88 You obviously are incapable of simple comprehension if you think that after watching the video.

[rmccay88]

@signawp

Everything I said he has said before, I never said he said it in this particular video. Look it up on Youtube, he has stated the exact same things I said below on his radio show and on Fox.

[signawp]

@rmccay88 Balogna. I have seen him on Fox and he has stated no such thing. Nice try.

[rmccay88]

@signawp

v=UjeJomD8RXI

There is your end link on Youtube.

[signawp]

@rmccay88 See above too.

it is a common style of argumentation. I will get more this way as you get more that way. We did it in graduate seminars all the time. Taken out of context, one can accuse just about anyone of anything.

It was pretty funny to watch everyone's argument style. They all had valid points and did their jobs in making sure they were all out there.

He did state the VIP muslim airport line, but clarified the specifics a few lines earlier. I like totalities, not selective snips

[signawp]

Argumentation styles.

[signawp]

@rmccay88 I actually did see that very show. I like the robust debate, where people aren't killed or threatened or beheaded for their beliefs. A forum for rational debate. It's always hilarious, to me, when the debates get heated and devolve into the lines of argumentation in simple.

I just didn't see it like you did, based on what I stated in prior posts.

[lyntonio]

talking of technicality , how many of you know how much of Islam is a religion

watch this and ask the obvious

.com/watch?v=tDs-hCIL_wM