Added: 3 years ago
From: ttinmysoup
Views: 21,164
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (342)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • Lol i love how it's only Muscle car fags that hate on tuners. Tuners NEVER hate back. What does that tell you? Jealous. :)

  • HELL YEAH AMERICAN MUSCLE ALL THE WAY!!!

    fuck that ugly overworshipped jap shitbox!

  • I see some lame comments. 07Z06SS, what the fuck is with this "rice burner" shit?

    Does the use of that term help you make up for the fact that you have NO Dick?

    Supra or corvette, regardless, A REAL MAN will have Respect for BOTH cars, matter of fact ALL cars. Pussy!!

  • How about burning a 700 hp baby Supra you fucking redneck? You CAN'T

  • i did check.toyota may have lost a percentage of sales.EVERY1 knows that.but that still didnt stop them from being number 1 WORLDWIDE.america doesnt always tell the WHOLE story.EVERY1 had recalls.go to wikipedia and look it up yourself if you dont believe me.its just like manufactureing.this govt would rather let asains make our clothes and electronics than pay americans.they allow toyota and others here because they know regardless theyre gunna make a profit.its greed.a

  • @07Z06ss so sad to think ppl like u STILL exist

  • saying japanese cars are rice burners is racist.what if i called american cars mcdonald burners?or fat sloppy pigs?

  • the supra didnt deserve all the crap it got in this video, its a very well made car. and all this crap about american vs japaneese vs european needs to stop. all countries have nice and crappy cars, you cant just say just because it american then its crap. i mean look at it, americans got the corvette zr1, european got mclaren f1/enzo, japan got skyline/supra/nsx.

    ive had fast japaneese cars, and now i got a fast american car. and they are both amazing cars

  • camera man sucks.

  • what times was the supra? I assume 13.99 ?

    the Z06? looks like 11 sec.

  • @choua01 supra was high 12s, z06 high 11s

  • american cars sucks import owns..

  • where you from dumbass american muscle is a lot better than all the other car

  • @11000corvette

    American car and you can su.ck my d.ck b.tch.

  • i gotta say that some other people make good cars but American muscle is the best u fucking idiot

  • @11000corvette Haha, you have no idea. Germans and Italians make much better cars than American does. The quality of American made cars will never compare to the quality of Italian or German cars. On another video you told a gay he was a dumb ass and to learn the facts, you should do the same.

  • are you like spying on mee or something mind your own business faggot stop stocking meee and im not always talking about speed like you american cars are better i was born here and thats what i grew up with go american muscle

  • @11000corvette You're on YouTube, there is no privacy. It's *stalking* you idiot. I was never talking about speed. Luxury, dependability, style, and performance. You don't get that in American cars. American muscle is my favorite, but I know enough to realize German and Italian cars are much more amazing. You're a fifteen year old kid with NO automotive experience and NO experience in life, talking about things you will never understand. Grow up and stop talking shit in every car video you see.

  • @11000corvette

    american car sucks compare to other cars, you fucking idiot.

  • @11000corvette if america was the BEST then they woulnt ve needed a bailout that they will NEVER repay.TOYOTA is number in sales around the entire world.honda is 6th.gm is only popular here

  • @lilfreeway21 Toyota hasn't been a in a high number of sales for the past 3 years.....look at how many recalls they had on almost all of their lineups...check your info

  • Ok the zr1 is faster than most of the other cars out there the mustang and camoro look a lot better those other piece of shit cars buts ur opinion that u think other cars are better than american Muscle but i think america makes better stuff and were smarter at it

  • @11000corvette They weren't smarter at it. After the oil crisis in the 80s, they changed muscle cars. They have never been the same, like they were in the 60s. The Viper was the rebirth of the muscle car era, but again, nothing like what they used to be. Italians never cared about going cheap, they kept their cars at $300k and still make some of the most luxurious cars in the world.

  • @DarkZombieZ88 Last time I checked there were no Italian cars that even came close to the Nurburgring lap time of the 2012 ZR1 (7:19) or the 2010 Viper ACR (7:12)...just sayin

  • @07Z06ss It's not always about speed or handling. It's about what the vehicles are. And nothing can compared to something such as a Lamborghini o Ferrari. The MC12 has done 7:24.3, which is decently close compared to the hundreds of cars that attempted the infamous 'Ring. Luxury automobiles are more about the statement, not just about power or handling.

  • @DarkZombieZ88 7:24.3? that's it? the ZR1 Z06 and the ACR Viper all have better times than that

  • @07Z06ss I know that, kid. Like I said, it's not just about that. Those Italian cars are a statement. A Corvette is still a Corvette. You will get more looks in a Lamborghini. I love the Z06 and ZR1, but Italian cars are in their own league.

  • @DarkZombieZ88 Yes the Italian cars are in their own league, but the ZR1, z06 and ACR will outperform them in every way possible

  • @07Z06ss Nobody cares about that. So what? The ZR1 is still a Chevrolet. The Viper is still a Dodge. Granted Lamborghini helped build the Vipers block from an old truck engine, it's still a Dodge. Italian cars will always be better than American cars. We care too much about money while they care too much about perfection.

  • @DarkZombieZ88 and? Ferrari used technology from the Cadillac CTS-V to improve their suspension....bottom line is ACR Z06 and ZR1 are BETTER in performing than any italian car around the nurburgring

  • @07Z06ss Nobody cares about that though. Most people will still pick a Ferrari or Lamborghini over a Dodge and a Chevrolet.

  • @DarkZombieZ88 yeah they will, if they want to pay for car that has less performance

  • @07Z06ss No, they won't. Most people who has these cars know there is something better and faster out there. You have a lot to learn. You need to go learn about these cars and their owners before making more of us look bad.

  • @DarkZombieZ88 You just contradicted yourself, haha and the only thing that is making something look bad is the cars that the ZR1, Z06, and ACR eat up on the Nurburgring all day long :)

    case closed

  • Any cars made from Japan is RICE BURNER!!! Shut up and get over it! Another example sport cars that's made in America is called American Muscles. Accept these facts. For those who has been cussing and name calling are immature!

  • @samtheman222000 and all american cars are redneck mobiles right? lol figured. can't turn corners so you dis people who can ahhahaah. Learn to structure sentences before giving people shit.

  • @RXHardstyle labeling and stereotyping never ends. A lot of Americans are not rednecks. you need to do your homework before calling people redneck. you just made yourself sounds like a redneck. and no i'm not dissing imports. gets your facts straight before you open your mouth because you just made yourself look like an idiot. don't go around thinking you're all that and to me you're just embarrassing yourself so just cool it...

  • @samtheman222000 lol listen to yourself. Labeling and stereotyping never ends yep i agree with you there but umm in your previous comment you said ALL jap cars are rice burners. That point is exactly the same as me saying all americans are rednecks. Yet now you're saying you're not dissing imports? wtf i have feeling that you're the one whos not really understanding what they have just said.

  • @samtheman222000 Not all jap cars are rice burners. if you're gona have a go at me for stereotyping wrong then you probably should be looking at what your saying first coz your stereo typing of "rice burners" is probably as bad is my "rednecks"

  • Dude you talk S#!% about your own friends supra yet he still gives you a ride? I would've left your 2 face aS$ at the track.

  • Hahahahhahahhahaha at the guy with the accent at the end of the video

  • 3:02 LMAO @ "poopra"

  • gotta love the stock c6 z06 naturally aspirated beast running stock low-mid 11s or high 11s if your bad

  • @Soulscarz Actually if your really good you can get them in the 10's... look around on here. :)

  • @twztd28 yeah low-mid 11s if your decent and high 10s if your like jesus. Makes me wounder why the ZR1 with a supercharger cant 10s that often. Thats why i like the Z06 because if you were to put the same supercharger, it would probably get better then 638 hp since it already starts off with a bigger motor and 505 hp

  • @Soulscarz all the Z06's I've seen run mid to high 10's on Drag radials, I've seen a ZR1 run the same time with normal street tires. :) Its mostly because the ZR1 doesn't get traction, I was in a 610 horse Z06 this weekend and I spun the tires through 1st and 2nd with barely any force at all hahaha

  • Corvettes are slow poorly made death traps.

  • @exBMRguy Whaaaat!?!?!?

  • @exBMRguy sure thing buddy! your cool!

  • All american "sport cars" need like v8 or v10 engines with atleast 8.0l in them. Along comes a german 2.5l V5 car with a tiny turbo in and smokes teh living crap out of em.

    Not in this clip though, but overall :P

  • @kungthomas

    Like you said 2.5L v5 car... WITH A TURBO!

    You can have a thousand fucking cylinders it's all about compression, and compression puts out power , Example ! Forced induction! dumb ass.

  • @Roger0416 No shit assface. Need to explain to the retard here i guess, what i meant was that the pure volume is so much more then needed for making it go fast. And i rly do <3 cocky 3 year olds behind a computer screen, go slit your wrists or something while your at it dickhead

  • @kungthomas

    Aw, your mad I proved you wrong? Ha, Cocky, na, I actually gave you facts , and shut you up :)

  • @Roger0416 Cocky? yes... u called me a dumbass for no reason. Thats why i went emo. I can atleast admit it. 99% of all users on youtube finds this place to be a place to call ppl names for no damn reason instead of correcting them like normal ppl would.

  • @kungthomas v5's don't exist

  • @theguythatcould nope but a 5 cylinder does.

  • @caniwatchavidplz yes i know inline 5 or in otherwords srtaight 5

  • @kungthomas you sound so dumb right now haha. respect all car culture.

  • @KLOEBGUITAR I do, and other ppl

  • @airsofter431 Z06 looks way better, it performs better on track and on a drag strip.

  • @airsofter431 hahaha then do some upgrades to the vette and bang..the vette has it again. lol the hp to weight ratio cant be beat on the vette. thats why it will always be better then the supra. it doesnt matter if you try weight reduction either. because every part on a supra you can lighten. the already lighter vette, still has a part out there you can buy even lighter

  • I don't know why people think a BPU Supra is running near a C6 ZO6. The C6Z with drag radials is a 10 second car at 128 mph with only tires. No BPU Supra is running 10s on straight 93 octane. I am older than most people in those post probably and I went through the entire Supra era in my 20s and remember them quite well.

  • Dude a supra is definitely NOT a riceburner. Those Supras still go for $20,000+, While a corvette at that age doesnt.

  • @xGodlyxTapoutx Grand Nationals are older and still go for that kind of money and forget about touching a GNX for under 75K that has low miles. I had a 87 Grand national that was modded with 52K original and I sold it for $17,500 in less than a week. I agree the Supra is definitely no rice burner.

  • The person who posted this video should die for calling the MKIV Supra a rice burner...

  • damn supras are so sexyy !! and the guy at the end LOL 1st he cant say mercedes and 2nd its a infinity xD

  • you would be fairly dissapointed if your 6 litre engined vette could`nt out run a 3 litre supra , turbo or not they can be made quick, they are a decent car and they don`t fall to bits, credit where credit is due.

  • @jowiggy916 um NO! Did you hear that wheel hop out of the supra. BPU/more power would have made it worse. Supra's are the hardest cars to make quik in the 1/4 mile. For the power their making they should be faster. And don't go and link me to video of John Woon or what ever his name is. He barely ran a 8.99 sec ET but with a trap of 164 he should have went 7.8. Supra's are only good from a 100 roll with 1000+ rwhp (.) BTW I don't think the Supra's appreciate you swinging from their nuts.

  • sorry but how is a exotic sports car (the supra) a rice burner?

  • And on you're right you see a DAILY DRIVEN supra giving a vette a head start and smoke it's ass running a 8.7 at 161mph.

  • why would u race a corvette with a shitty supra there crap. the vette will smoke any import any day.

  • @bhenrichs30 : You are so God damn stupid it hurts.

  • Supras are overated. They need 100000000000000000000000000000­000000000000000000000000000000­000000000000000000000000000000­000000000000000000000000000000­000000000000000000000000000000­000000000000000000000000000000­000000000000000000000000000000­000000000000000000000000000000­000000000000000000000000000000­000000000000000000000000000000­000000000000000000000000000000­000000000000000000000000000000­000000000000000000000000000000­000000000000000000000000000000­000000hp against a stock exotic car to win.

  • @vfIskullangel supras need 1000hp over a stock exotic car to beat it.you say...yet its still half a milliion dollars less and you put your own work into it which gets you respect....what you think gets more respect, being a rich asshole with a lambo knowing nothing about cars or spenging 800k less on supra you put work into and building a 1000hp car?

  • @chris12123212 So your going to sit here and argue price?. You realise that to build one of those big hp Supras that your going to spend roughly six figures on the car itself like about 100k not including the cost of the Supra. In the end you should have bought the exotic anyways.

  • @vfIskullangel i wasnt just arguing price...its still about respect of building a 1000hp car...you can go ahead and be that asshole with money and buy a lambo or ferrari, yeah theyre fast but u bought it like that...u pull into a car meet yeah people will be like oooohhhh niceee then a 1000hp supra pulls in and pops the hood next to you...whos gonna have more poeple around?? whos gonna have more to say what is done to their car?? the supra

  • @chris12123212 Just because someone buys an Exotic over a Tuner doesn't make them an asshole. You know something a Lamborghini Countach will draw MUCH more attention than a 1000hp Supra or Skyline does regardless of what you say the girls will wanna hit up the guy with a Lamborghini because thats bank, thats status where as the Supra is just a Toyota.

  • @vfIskullangel i agree 100% i would rather drive a slow lamborghini than a super fast toyota any day when i see a supra i think about eating rice.

  • @chris12123212 wrong more people would be very impressed with the lambo or ferrari because 1.They r very exclusive cars 2.most people dont know anybody with a exotic and will be very intrigued about the car 3.Its a exotic supercar need i say more at the end of the day a supra is nothing more than a toyota in a different suit so know matter how much horsepower it has it still is a outdated toyota nothing more nothing less.

  • @chris12123212 If the person can afford a lambo im quite sure they can afford a supra but choose not to because at the end of the day in their driveway it still is a toyota.

  • @vfIskullangel You r definetly right they r over rated thats why u dont see rich people at barret jacksons auto auction looking to plunk down good money to buy a supra why buy a supra when you can afford a ferrari enzo or bugatti veyron thats just common sense most rich peoples kid wouldnt even want a supra when they can have a viper remember the scene in fast and the furious when the guy said to the guy in the supra more than u can afford FERRARI.

  • that supra is not rice stupid redneck hillbillies !

  • how is that a rice burner... i dont see no euro lights big wheels..

    JDM FTW

  • Hands down a Hooked up supra will take any V8 if it is built properly that block was built to take the pounding of up to 1000 horses man

  • toyota quit building the supra because it was a fail, way too much warranty repair

  • lmao!! "poopra"

  • your dad bought a GNX for 5500? lmao sure buddy.....you find my a grand national for 5grand and ill buy 5 of them

  • haha

    toyota supra - the only car that can have more than 700 rwhp and still run 12s

  • hope you are being sarcastic

  • @zabcod

    Do you know that TOP Fuel Dragsters have 8000 rwhp as same as torque, and still run 4-5 secs???

    Fastest Celica with 2JZ-GTE modded engine running about 6 sec with 4X less power, hm.. EPIC FAIL.

  • @zabcod

    Supra have problem with weight on front end and it's very light at rear, that's mean bad traction. MR layout is best for 1/4 mile, of course with light-weighted car, and some good drag radials. Also AWD cars have best traction, but it's so expensive.

  • the supra isnt that ricy

  • my 2 fav cars, getin a z06 next month hopefully :D

  • Rice burner? You dork! That statement is for those ugly honda chick cars with pep boys body kits, what are you gonna call the skyline... one too? The title is very specific ( STOCK SUPRA ) vs Z06 corvette, that's an uneven match to begin with. The supra has proven itself against all car makers of the world, so anything said after that is just angry meat heads wich probably got stomped by one.

  • Man people are retarded. If most of you people praising the supra knew or even understood what it has you would realize that they really aren't impressive at all. Then this one being modded, and obviously still lost goes to show you.

  • what makes you think this is modded? if it was right behind the zo6 and he bogged 2nd gear, thats a mid 13 sec run given the zo6 ran its near stock time, not too bad for a car thats more than a decade older. one more thing, i dont see ls blocks handling the power 2jzs can

  • Because the MK4's are high 13's stock, and if you've actually ever seen one at the track, the turbo's don't tend to be that loud, granted it seems like a pretty cold enviroment. And there are plenty of stock block LS engine's making over 1k hp. Where supra's normaly require a swap on the bottom end, and that's considering inline six's tend to be alot more durable (not just Supra motors).

  • wrong wrong wrong, stock mk4 supra out of the factory is a 13.4, which isnt high, there is a supra in my garage, i know what they are capable of.  wrong on the bottom end idiot, its usually the top end if anything, go look at those 9 or 8 sec supras, they have head upgrades if anything, supras bottom end can handle 1000hp EASILY, its been done, but i have yet to see any other motor do that consecutively and reliably such as the supra does

  • Lol your last sentence there shows that you are obviously and simply bias. And why is it in your garage? =P. Pointing out "9 or 8" second supra's has nothing to do with what I said. Any car can be fast. If you had a Supra I doubt your name would be b18tuner, most Supra guys I've met hate Honda's and other ricerburners (I still call Supra's rice but they think of themselves as "tuners"). There are plenty of cars that break 1000hp and stil even come with warranties.

  • its fact, google it, i hope you know what that is, its the most overbuilt engine to date. its in my garage, its my stepfather's, we work on it togther, its a mk3 and still eats up any car at the drag, and its only a low 10 sec car. you consider the supra a ricer, since it holds records that alot of muscle cant come close to? you are a little computer troll, since you post halo videos to your profile, so damn cool.

  • mkiv.supras,org Say's it's 13.8 @ 162kph/100mph, with 320bhp. Keep in mind HP is only achieved after the turbos spool and VVT is engaged. Thus 13.8 makes perfect sense. I'll use an SS camaro as a comparison: 325bhp with far more tq then a supra, also a couple hundred lbs. lighter then a supra, and like I pointed out the camaro doesn't have to wait to achieve it's HP... And it runs low 13's...Oh and I was speaking of the LS1 camaro's Or 4th Generation. Guess I should have mentioned that.

  • hahaha you moron! thats the jdm supra! hence the RZ model name! thats 40 hp less than the USDM! look it up at a real website, even on wikipedia it says low 13s! if supras were that slow, i would have a chance agaisnt them in my mr2! and saying they are slower than lt1 camaros? you are a moron. VVT doesnt add hp either, its vvtl or vvtl-i that does, vvt saves fuel mileage, and only 98 models had that! please learn something before you argue with an expert

  • Can you not read? I wrote LS1 not LT1. And Wikipedia is a user influenced. And an MR2? Lmao. VVT = Variable Valve Timing, V-tec is a good example of VVT. It's essentially the same thing as a larger cam but only at certain RPM's (4500RPM's for Honda's). Lol VVT doesn't add HP...F*ckin' ricers don't even know their own sh*t lol.

  • HAHAHA YOU CANT READ! "Keep in mind HP is only achieved after the turbos spool and VVT is engaged." dont be such a hypocrite. vvt is continuous, constantly changing the cam profile to save gas, while v-tec switches only once, to a more powerful profile, and higher end to get more hp out, two different systems, moron. and like i said, only the 98 supras had vvt! what? and i said lt1 because 13.8 is what they run, not what supras do. no more excuses from you?

  • Lol dude...you know so little about cars it's amazing. Why would VVT be continuous? What's the point of seperate arms running the whole time? To save gas? lmao.. And TT supra's get like 13mpg...Yah they obviously save gas so well. And Appearantly you're the only one talking about LT1's here, so why even mention that? It only makes you look stupider.

  • did you even read my comment. first of all, vvt is continuous, meaning that it changes profile to suit the driving condition, while v-tec engages and disengages at the same time, only once during the rpm band, not more than once. you really need to reread the statement, you are a ricer.

  • Putting a tire on one during your employement at Discount Tire doesn't mean you helped build one =P. Dude, you're on the internet, look it up for F's sake...Unless you did and that's why you think it's "constant" Not "continuous", dumb ass. Two stroke engine's tend to have a constant lift vs lobe set up, so lower RPM's won't effect the motor...Lol

  • first you give me wrong info and you have trouble finding the correct specs, now you call me wrong? i have proof of my statements, please reread yours. you dont believe i helped build a supra? i have pics of the build. you dont believe supras can run 13s flat stock? i have a handful of websites along with videos. you are on youtube, use it retard

  • I found multiple sites saying the sames specs you moron, just cause ONE site says they run low 13's doesn't mean they do. As an example, there are mustang sites that say the GT500 runs high 11's stock...Which is bull sh*t. So where is your proof? One site saying you're right where many others say you're wrong isn't what most people would call proof...

  • you are too lazy to look it up! just look on youtube, moron! you cannot honestly be that dumb, you just dont wanna deny your ignorance!

  • Lol look it up on Youtube? Dude. how many stock Supra's are on Youtube?

  • enough! because i found it within one search page!

  • OK now you just opened the can. MK IV Supras are low 13 second cars. Many drivers have gotten low 13s and very few even got into the high 12s with them (Ryan Woon on a six speed manual). The supra in this video only has an exhaust which is only a 25hp upgrade if that. The fact that you call this car rice truly shows your ignorance and the fact that you say it can only achieve a high 13 in stock form further shows that. Driver skill is part of everything.

  • Lol ignorance? Dude multiple sites say you're wrong, one says you're right...It's amazing how often ignorant people call other people ignorant on Youtube. And yes EVERY site says they get 13-15mpg cty. And yah driver factor has something to do with it, but when it's a good driver vs. a pro driver, there won't be a very big difference.

  • Thats funny it says 13mpg city because I get more like 16mpg and I my Supra is modded. As far as times on the magazines I have always seen cars perform better than the magazine specs say. Look at the C6 Z06, its advertised at doing 11.7 and there are good drivers doing low 11s and pro drivers like Ranger doing 10s with drag radials. Like I said I have seen many people get low 13s on Supras. The only production American car faster than it in 1993 was the Dodge Viper.

  • You seem like a smart guy who can atleast argue a valid point and stats, I'm only argueing the experience side of it. My every day driver is bone stock, it's ok fast but nothing special, and I've kept up with very lightly modded MK4's, granted they usually tend to pull away pretty good at about 70mph I can only assume that's VVT kicking in hard.

  • @TiKondaRoga All turbos have lag but production cars have very little lag. A stock supra makes 90% of its torque at 2000 rpms. If you ever see a well built BPU Supra on the track and put it up against a big turbo supra making the same power the Single turbo supra will lose. Another thing to mention is that the Supra was released during the LT1 Camaro and was only around for 1 year in America when the LS1 Camaro came out (1998).

  • there were many stock 12´s and even 11´s production cars long time before this supra even came out

  • There were, but honestly how many of them came within $20,000 of the Supra's Price range? Most of the cars making times like those back in 1993 were Lambos, Ferraris and Super cars that were in excess of $100,000.

  • well - you could buy a ZL1 Camaro (high 11´s-low 12´s car w/ drag radials) in 1969 for just around 7200$ but the money was worth much more back then so Im not quite sure

    in the 60´s you could buy the same stuff for 7200$ which costs around 20.000$ today

    well - the supra is a great car for its price range no doubt

    but isn´t the supra a bit heavy ?

    I´ve heared those stock supras weigh around 1640Kg

    so much weight kills the power to weight ratio :S

  • @3O2MuStAnG That's a classic right there. Thats sort of similar to me saying that today the fastest car I can buy for less than $25,000 is a C5 Z06. When I meant fastest car in its price range I was referring to fastest new car in its price range. If I referred that to the example I just put it would make the fastest NEW car that I can get today for under $25,000 a Cobalt SS.

    Supras are Heavy cars. If you think its heavy you should see a 3000GT VR4 or some of these new muscle cars. :)

  • bah dude - the new muscle car generation sucks

    the only new american V8 sports-/musclecar which is actually great for its price is the chevy vette C6 Z06 [505Hp&640Nm TQ @ 1420Kg] for just around 60.000€

    I was damn disappointed when I saw the new challenger ... a 2ton fatass with 425Hp - even a N/A civic with just 300Hp can kill the srt8 chally :S

    hemi´s are become a joke :S

    btw r u going to get a Supra ? - cuz it seems like you love this car as well

  • I acutally own one. If you look at my videos you will see a walk through and a run of my car. I will post some CGI races in Mexico soon.

  • more than 570rwhp - impressive

    you will probably run low 11´s ?

    pls inform me when u´ve got a vid of a 1/4 mile run

  • in 1969 $7200 is like 50000 2day. But a supra is a great car =D

  • @kageryu311 or shelbys, or camaros, or trans ams, or corvettes, or some monte carlos, what the hell are you talking about dude?

  • what are you talking about? If you are talking about cars that were as fast in that price range, remember I am referring to 1993. out of all of the cars you listed the only one that did 13s of the same year model was the Corvette (ZR-1, the LT1 Corvette did low 14s stock)

  • there were factory cars back in the 60's that would pull 12's! The superstock factory cars were mental pulling 11's and quicker! muscle all the way

  • One more thing to leave you off with. Not many vids of stock Supras but here you go.

    /watch?v=VlEb22iWkY8

  • As I compared it to an SS camaro: more hp, alot more torque, and less weight, is rated @13.3 in the 1/4. So hows does a heavier car with less power and power lag (turbo's and VVT) run the same time? Please explain this...

  • OK now lets put out the facts: 1994 Toyota Supra (2JZ-GTE) 320 hp @5600rpms 315 torque @ 4000rpms curb weight 3,417 lbs 0-60 4.6 seconds 1/4 mile 13.3 (2002 JDM Supra does 13.1) 2000 Camaro SS (LS1) 320hp @5500rpms 345 torque @4400rpms curb weight 3,439 lbs 0-60 4.6 seconds 1/4 mile 13.3 seconds
  • Ok, you looked up the wrong camaro appearantly. GM has the SS hard top weighing in @ 3,306lbs and rated @ 13.2 with 325bhp and 350 ft. lbs....that's GM's listing. You may have looked up the V6 or the convertible, cause both are heavier then the SS. And yes, VVT and Turbo's both have a lag... I see MK4's at my local track all the time, and I've never seen a stock or semi stock one even break into the 13's (keep in mind I live in Arizona where the atmospheric pressure is crap).

  • @TiKondaRoga VVT is really a feature placed in the car to allow it to straighten out the torque curve. Now if you look at its newest decendant the Lexus IS-F now that is an impressive car for today. It is a 5.0 V8 that does 12.7 stock in the 1/4. The reason I mention the IS-F is because it is one of the concepts from Toyota on how they were going to build the new Supra.

  • Ok...what does the LT1 have to do with anything we are talking about? And VVT is a hp peice not torque...

  • @TiKondaRoga The LT1 has to do with it because that the Camaro that was around for most of the MKIV Supra's lifespan. Everyone keeps comparing the MKIV Supra to the newer Camaro and forget to realize this car was built in America for only a year when the LS1 Camaro came out.

  • @TiKondaRoga All I am saying about the Supra is that stock for stock its power band is similar to that of the LS1 Camaro. They both make Peak torque at 4 grand and make peak horsepower at 5500 rpms. They are both top end cars with long gears. The VVT is what allows the Supra to achieve such top end.

  • The only advantage the SS has on the Supra is 30ft lbs of torque. And why are you talking about turbo lag and VVT on the Supra when both cars make peak torque and hp at the same time? Where did you get your facts from?

  • Stock Supras get 13mpg? you are a fucking idiot and you really know nothing about cars.I love how you act like you know it all but you really don't.

  • @TiKondaRoga Man TiKondaRoga u know your car stuff.

  • @b18tuner5875 HA HAAA, Computer Troll

  • @TiKondaRoga i call them ricers too they r the GOD FATHER of RICE they r so much RICE that they should be the mascot of all chinese restaraunts.

  • And you should look up the definition of "hypocrit". Cause I don't even see where anything I said could be taken as being hypocritical...

  • are you just acting stupid so i look wrong? i quoted you!

  • you idiot, i praise it because i HELPED BUILD ONE, I obviously know way more about it than you!

  • @TiKondaRoga Hey NAVY buddy i recognize a name like that i agree with you 100% their is no replacement for displacement.

  • very true my friend

  • yea these guy dont even know what they are talking about if they are giving all the ppl that do know whats goin on thumbs down that vette is fast but the supra is faster if it did have the same power not even close comparison supra is best end of story noobs

  • yeah supras are the shit and american muscle is well fast but made very shitty

  • yeah the stock supra is def gona loose to astock vette its logic it also has 200 less hp if the cars both had the same hp then the supra would kill the vette no problem casue supras are the best and ussually the fastest

  • @pilot420 wow what a dumb opinion... you do know the supra still has 500lbs on a z06?

  • But the Vette was stock. and it wonnnnnnnnnn..Hmmmm

  • yea buddy at least jowiggy knows what heis talking about cause the rest of ya just sound retarted there is no comparison in stock vs stock

  • first race would of been close..if the driver shifted right..stock vs stock...corvette should take the supra..but with a t88 single turbo..its too easy..

  • Oh yeah it was the shifting. The fact that is was not as fast had nothing at all to do with it.

  • Lol the end is so funny.

  • Best run of the day was when that SYCLONE pwnd the poopra

  • Ricer got raped big time as usual. Not surprised.

  • Vetts don't always win....Just take a look at some of the vids on here and on google of them getting beaten by Supras.

  • it no contest vettes always WIN WASTE OF A VIDEO

  • always?

  • supra are not a ricer. supra is a legend of a super car.

  • they're good..but they're no legend..they're boats and stock are not all that trackable..there are several better cars out there from japan..RX7 and GTR being two of them..there are better 4 doors from japan even..

  • bov for turbo surge and all i think is that his supra on the video here is just having an intake, dp,exhaust, and a little of boost or maybe he need a new grip of clutch to scratch off a bit. and what the heck is that mercede??? is a infinit g35.. omg..lol.. "ES MAI MAK SAY DEE"

  • its from japan so by definition it sure as hell is a rice burner

  • If the (same car) was from us then it would be?