We must allow human pops to increase naturally, as people have every God-given right to refuse the unnatural Big Pharma contraceptive potions and poisons
I agree very much with allowing human pops to rise naturally, "out of control," "unchecked," or whatever anti-life nuts might try to call it
However, do we need so many people in the big cities? I wish gov wasn't so corrupt, and somebody could promote economic opportunities in the countryside, so more people could stay rural, not crowd cities
@pronatalist You don't understand. There's simply not enough space for everyone. It's a simple idea that the economic growth of India is behind its population growth. We need to educate the people of India to delay the time at which they procreate. By doing so, we will reduce the phenomenon of population momentum, by which the population increases at a rapid rate. Perhaps not a one-child policy, but a delayed child policy, with limited children.
Of course there is enough space for everybody. What? Is the corrupt gov hoarding too much of the land?
"Educate" the people? Or do you mean, propagandize? There is no need to delay procreation, for human fertility is a fragile blessing that fades quickly with advancing age. Ability to conceive a child, is not certain, and we humans can't just "pop out a baby" on demand.
Pop momentum should be even higher, let pop expand at a rapid rate, so far more people can experience life.
@pronatalist Oh, by "experience life", are you referring to the slum-like conditions already experienced in India, or the soon -to-be exacerbated slum-like conditions? Land refers not only to square meter, but the ability to proved human conditions in a given space. Sure, there's space, if you want people to destroy all the forests, and ultimately live unsustainably in a manner that will surely lead to an increase in malnourishment and strife.
Try to open your mind. "Experience life" refers to a wide range of conditions. Large families continuing to grow naturally within overcrowded slum-like conditions. Large families continuing to grow naturally within spacious nice new homes. Parents who love children and refuse contraceptives due to practical or "religious" objections. Families of all sizes, because not everybody is all that fertile.
Yes, I welcome more billions, but it takes decades to grow, ample time to ADAPT
There's nothing wrong with encouraging "huge" pops like that of India, to increase demographic momentum, family size to rebound to as large as ever, as before in history before all the rampant contraceptive pushing, and allow massive human pops to grow more youthful and expand at a natural and rapid rate.
So more far people can experience life, all effort should go only to pop ACCOMMODATION, never imposing pop "control"
Build more huge cities, suburbs, whatever the people need
We must allow human pops to increase naturally, as people have every God-given right to refuse the unnatural Big Pharma contraceptive potions and poisons
I agree very much with allowing human pops to rise naturally, "out of control," "unchecked," or whatever anti-life nuts might try to call it
However, do we need so many people in the big cities? I wish gov wasn't so corrupt, and somebody could promote economic opportunities in the countryside, so more people could stay rural, not crowd cities
pronatalist 2 months ago
@pronatalist You don't understand. There's simply not enough space for everyone. It's a simple idea that the economic growth of India is behind its population growth. We need to educate the people of India to delay the time at which they procreate. By doing so, we will reduce the phenomenon of population momentum, by which the population increases at a rapid rate. Perhaps not a one-child policy, but a delayed child policy, with limited children.
Dzongka 1 week ago
@Dzongka
Of course there is enough space for everybody. What? Is the corrupt gov hoarding too much of the land?
"Educate" the people? Or do you mean, propagandize? There is no need to delay procreation, for human fertility is a fragile blessing that fades quickly with advancing age. Ability to conceive a child, is not certain, and we humans can't just "pop out a baby" on demand.
Pop momentum should be even higher, let pop expand at a rapid rate, so far more people can experience life.
pronatalist 1 week ago
@pronatalist Oh, by "experience life", are you referring to the slum-like conditions already experienced in India, or the soon -to-be exacerbated slum-like conditions? Land refers not only to square meter, but the ability to proved human conditions in a given space. Sure, there's space, if you want people to destroy all the forests, and ultimately live unsustainably in a manner that will surely lead to an increase in malnourishment and strife.
Dzongka 1 week ago
@Dzongka
Try to open your mind. "Experience life" refers to a wide range of conditions. Large families continuing to grow naturally within overcrowded slum-like conditions. Large families continuing to grow naturally within spacious nice new homes. Parents who love children and refuse contraceptives due to practical or "religious" objections. Families of all sizes, because not everybody is all that fertile.
Yes, I welcome more billions, but it takes decades to grow, ample time to ADAPT
pronatalist 1 week ago
@Dzongka
There's nothing wrong with encouraging "huge" pops like that of India, to increase demographic momentum, family size to rebound to as large as ever, as before in history before all the rampant contraceptive pushing, and allow massive human pops to grow more youthful and expand at a natural and rapid rate.
So more far people can experience life, all effort should go only to pop ACCOMMODATION, never imposing pop "control"
Build more huge cities, suburbs, whatever the people need
pronatalist 1 week ago