Its not like im anti conspiracy but offcourse when a boeing filled with kerosine hits a huge scryscraper made of concrete and metal, you will hear somekind of 'boom'.
Im not saying there wernet any bombs cause I have trouble believing that within just nearly 60 minutes, the metal would metal and the whole building would fall down within few seconds like it was toys and never stood for almost 4 decades.
@cosmo7652002 t doesn't, the plane tipped sideways so it wouldn't miss the buldng, whch made it seem like it disappeared, but it didn't, and you could see that it tipped clearly in other videos
the audio somehow does not match the video. The sound is not of a plane nor the reaction of the observer i mean he reacts like 10 seconds before the impact??? and the plane engines doesnt really sound like a plane.. mhhh
@cramtoro It does, the camera is far away from WTC and sound is of course slower than light. You'll only hear it after some time. Well, the engines? I didn't hear any. Only an explosion. And I think you wanted to say AFTER the impact not BEFORE.
3. the front of the 'missile' pops out the other side and is clearly intact. some say this is to do with nose in nose out hoax etc. drives me mad. its clearly a missile tip. the nonbelievers who still insist airliners can do that choose to ignore that point wen you attempt to discuss it with them
@mvpool I am not attempting to bash any opinions or points of view. But think about this... 1st: Missiles are supersonic weapons, most travel at up to 3 times the speed of sound. (Look up the footage) You would be lucky to catch a glimpse of it if it when by. 2nd if you believe the plane was digitally edited over a "slow" flying missile then surely you yourself could agree that editing a wingtip out of exsistence on film is not impossible. this is theorist propoganda. Rise above friend.
@mvpool the missile being incorporated into the plane is possible. But then why use a missile? Missile warheads generally dont have a high amount of explosives. why not a bomb or crude bulk explosives in the cargo bay. The front landing assembly is made of Titanium. The forward enertia of a 500 Mph chunk of titanium surely would punch through a rather hollow building giving the effect that a projectile or missile warhead was punching out the other side.
@mvpool Can you tell its perfectly rounded in shape from this video? it may be... but lets be honest. from this view you cant tell if its a missile tip or beverage cart. besides when missiles impact a target the nose is the first thing destroyed... it doesnt retain its "Perfectly round "shape and the missile body wouldnt make it out the other side because it would have been destroyed my the burst charge. Missiles are unlikely. but its a nice observation.
@edgecrusher42483 it is 'round'. there is footage from other angles that also show this. it is uranium tipped and possibly shielded with quantum technology.
missiles travel at various speeds dependeding on the type.
whatever hit those buildings was not a passenger airliner.
@mvpool im interested in this theory, i havnt heard it before. I only have some questions if you dont mind. 1st why use a uranium tipped, quantum physics protected penetrator when the building is basically hollow. A warhead like that would be used for earth bunkers or targets burried in mountain caves. It makes no sense to use that on an office building. 2nd. What do you mean the illusion of a passenger Airline? are you suggesting no planes hit the towers?
@Sick3ninVend3tta Ok, i read that article and my conclusion is; "I have lost faith in all humanity's ability to retain common sense" that was a strait up fantasy novel. Explain to me why there is an aircraft shaped hole in the sides of the buildings (Clearly visible after impact) What of the countless amateur video clips and eye witnesses to aircraft hitting buildings? Missiles travel at 2-3 times the speed of sound and would have left a small hole. not an aircraft shilouhette shape. FAIL!
@edgecrusher42483, Edge, I can't explain on youtube the aircraft shaped holes in the sides of the buildings because I don't have the photographic evidence on here on me, only to suggest they were created by thermite, pre-plastered from the inside (particulary at WTC1)<<< Take note how "CLEAN CUT" the hole is, smooth edges. Again, I can't explain on here.
You can't give me one "credible" witness to any planes impacting. No missiles, No drones, no planes AT ALL 4 crash sites. I'm a no-planer.
@Sick3ninVend3tta Thermite does not leave clean cut holes! it is very volatile and melts metal in a liquid fashion. Do you really believe people would be sitting at their desks in the towers and not notice the tons of Thermite pods strapped to the walls? and the hole is instantly there after impact. Thermite would take at least 10 seconds to make the shape and sparks and smoke and flames would be raining out of the hole. There is a perfect clean cut silouhette because a PLANE hit the building!!!
@edgecrusher42483, Nope, I'm not referring to the photos of the liquid metal pouring out of the side of the building. I'm referring to the impact holes. Thermite pods not needed, just thermite paint. Marvin P. Bush, the president's younger brother, was a principal in a company called Securacom that provided security for the World Trade Center. This means they had full access to the building's throughout the night. At WTC1 smoke and flames did rain out of the hole on impact. It was thermite.
@Sick3ninVend3tta I see, your a "Nano-Thermite" believer. Thermite paint is possible in theory, However, even if you found a way to ignite it, it does not generate enough Killojoules to flash incinerate metal. Look it up. It is proven that thermite paint cannot transfer enough heat for long enough to cause the effect you explain. On a mythbusters episode they used 1,000 lbs of thermite in an attempt to cut through a car... and guess what . it barely made it through the roof. Your dreaming friend
@Sick3ninVend3tta im assuming you are refering to the photos of the liquid metal pouring out of the side of the building? i have seen these photos and video. Most suggest the use of thermite for the explaination due to Steel's low melting point. However, aluminum has a significantly lower melting point and there was tons of aluminum on site. The buildings outter frame, the AIRCRAFT fuselage, wings, engine parts... etc. No credible witnesses? all you need it eyes. and your credible. what else?...
@mvpool Im affraid Newton's laws are clearly shown. Acceleration, equal and opposite reactions, and objects in motion remain in motion until an external force acts upon it. If the Airliner flew right through the twin towers as you suggest, then yes, that would defy Newton, But if you look closely... the plane explodes and does not continue through the building. The buildings dissapear from the skyline yes, but from the 20th story down, the cores are still standing. Visible in some footage.
@edgecrusher42483 oh well, never mind, you are obviousy right and the laws of physics were altered that day. look up newtons laws and maybe you will grasp what i am saying.
@mvpool I have looked up newtons laws, many times. I looked them up once more after your last comment to try and see your standpoint. But i only found that netons laws were clearly seen. Im confused on your claim. Do you care to speculate or explain a little better why you think newton was defied? Your reason was not clear at all. I only see you throw outrageous claims with zero proof. You never replied to my question of your Uranium tipped penetrator theory either. Why would that be needed?
the uranium or the like tipped projectile has to be so because of newtons laws as normal planes don't slice through multiple construction grade steel columns and floor bars and reinforced concrete etc etc etc and then come out undamaged on the other side.
if a normal airliner hit it would have had impact and decelleration ultimately stopping with major front end damage.
i don't have the true answers to any of it, i didn't do it, but I know that what I see is illogical
@mvpool The plane did not make it out the other side undamaged... it exploded! The outside of WTC werent all steel, they were aluminum and glass with 'some' steel and concrete etc etc. The plane was unable to make it through the steel cores. A 500Mph aircraft would not just hit and stop, like an egg against a brick wall. cars can plow clear through homes made of brick steel concrete etc. Its clear we see things differently. Good luck in your pursuit of the truth. Take care my friend.
You hologram people are about as sharp as a wet loaf of bread. Search for September 11th 2001 Second Plane Crash Myers_clip6 posted by 911Crasting and tell me there aren't two wings.
@wonderboy2402 what the hell are you talking about? go to my profile and watch the footage slowed down and zoomed in you will see your explanation doesn't make sense.
@clayton9610 Maybe he wasn't looking at the point the plane hit just pointing his camera in the direction. Then he would turn around on hearing a bang; and one could easily think that that explosion is a bomb if you hadn't seen the plane. Even if he had seen the plane and said bomb, so what, does that make him 'in on it' and conclusive proof that there was a bomb? At the end of the day what people's reactions are to this is trivial and irrelevant in all the confusion and chaos of that day.
I have a friend that lived by there ..she told me it was just like it showed..no BS..sorry your all nuts..this happen to US..THE USA ..we go fucked by some assholes out for blood
@conceptual0theorist Swet heart..you must not live here in the USA..I know this did happen to out world,,or would you like something like this to happen in your world?? the number of CHILDREN that died is not right..but most sick Mother F**KERS don't give a shit about life..or even a child..yes mulims extremists would kill there own mother..just becouse..life doesn't mean athing
@conceptual0theorist ..please look how the rest of the world feels about extremists. killing a child is not right,,but muslim extremists would put a boom on a child to kill anyone else up.
@conceptual0theorist@conceptual0theorist ..please look how the rest of the world feels about extremists. killing a child is not right,,but muslim extremists would put a boom on a child to kill anyone else up.
I've zoomed in and slowed down the wing dissapearing. It's uploading now. When it's done I'll post a link here. It took me over an hour to find a program that would let me convert the .flv to enhance it lol.
hmmm wings dissapearing ...i see it as well...makes u wonder tho and bare with me just a second..u have all heard of project bluebeam yes? holograms? now how can a wing just dissapear on a real plane? it cant but suppose it was a hologram, and say a building got in the way of this holographic projection? that cud make a wing suddenly vanish? then boom!!! off go the bombs..just a thought
I for one think that what happened that day is NOT what has been fed to us by the media.
But as for this wing I believe what we are seeing is the plane in the shadow of a building and that shadow moving further down the wing as it moved forward.
If you look at the :06 mark you can see the sun's reflection off the tip as it's in the sunlight now.
also... after the *Plane* hits.. watch the birds go across the screen...These birds are speeding!!! They look as if they're going as fast as a missile does... as the rest of the video proceeds the birds look like they're back to flying at normal speed.... anyone else?
@tracehd1 its because at that time the birds are flying the opposite direction that the car is going so it looks like they are flying. the next set of birds is going with the car so obviously they will look slower since they are keeping up
omg... that's incredible! wow It really does disappear. I cannot see where you would get Camera Glare to the point it could wipe out a whole wing! Great catch
I didnt believe the "wing disappearing" comments until I paused it for myself before impact. I cannot help but ask, where DOES the right wing go just before impact? It visually fades out at first, and then in frames before impact it disappears completely!! Never noticed that before. Very odd.
@clayton9610 Excellent troll. Because anyone without a nutsack for a brain would know that if this was some kind of hologram or post-video work that was done on a frame by frame basis, there's no fucking way they would miss including part of the wing for *multiple frames*. All of you are assholes.
@clayton9610 So are you implying that it was a bomb? and not a plane that made the explosion? What of the tons of other footage that shows planes hitting them? this was shot from a moving vehicle, its not impossible to think the person was focusing on the road or the absolute chaos around them for that moment the plane hit. If i looked at abuilding with a fireball comming out of it, I would likely assume bomb as well
It is also not even close to impossible to be able to edit a plane into a video. And even if the person was somehow not focusing on a fucking burning skyscraper, its funny how he manages to say that three times without hearing anyone say "um actually a plane just crashed into the building, did you not see it?"
@clayton9610 Hes in a moving car! how many people do you think are around to correct him? hes not on a city bus, or standing in a crowd of people. Like i said, its possible they werent watching the building when the plane hit, only heard the sound and looked over to see nothing but a fireball!
@edwargo Don't fighter planes get that turbulence / airflow effect on their wings when they do a hard turn... Might explain why the wing fades out into the background.
HOLOGRAPHIC TECHNOLOGY!! its gonna be hard for some to phatham what kinds of technology it took to do this.. soon this truth will be revealed to all....
@01241923
01241923 1 day ago
very very very scary almost pied on myself but anyway i am 9
01241923 1 day ago
Who knows, it could have been a reflection of water or something. Conspiracy or not, planes flew into the buildings that day. It's irrefutable.
beabercj 2 months ago
stop @ 0:06 - no right wing
2009korte 5 months ago
Was Iceman who record the video?
hugoenoki 5 months ago
I had never seen this video before. It really shows the size of the plane, most of the videos seem to make the plane look very small.
Thanks for the upload.
slaction 5 months ago
Its not like im anti conspiracy but offcourse when a boeing filled with kerosine hits a huge scryscraper made of concrete and metal, you will hear somekind of 'boom'.
Im not saying there wernet any bombs cause I have trouble believing that within just nearly 60 minutes, the metal would metal and the whole building would fall down within few seconds like it was toys and never stood for almost 4 decades.
miriamuSama 5 months ago
incredible, speechless
wildwolves8 5 months ago
Comment removed
wildwolves8 5 months ago
look really closely at the right wing right before it hits the tower, who else noticed that it dissappears?
Spitfire995 7 months ago 2
@Spitfire995 I also noticed it. But then how does every video have the sound of engines?
ParamoreVzla 5 months ago
@Spitfire995
some missile was covered with a plane put on the video
2009korte 5 months ago
President Bush planned that out just for war
He planned it out with the Terrorists PS: Bombs were at the very bottom(basement)of the buildings
Some survivors
ExpIice 10 months ago
I am sared
TJDark45 10 months ago
0: 14 Somebody Said ''Thats a Bomb!!''
TheJannie5 11 months ago
i think its ridicolous!!!!! more than thousands of lives were lost and its just horrifying! my prayers
Ex7phEnoM 11 months ago
the wing disappears.
xcited4vids 11 months ago
this video is faked 911 is a inside job
bushbasher46 1 year ago
Comment removed
XxCeltics34xX 1 year ago
I stoped the vid at 0:6 and see that an entire wing is missing, just disappears. whats with that?
cosmo7652002 1 year ago 10
@cosmo7652002 No clue but there is apperantly alot of conspiracy theories on it.
SomeRusher 1 year ago
@cosmo7652002 un the exact same frame there is a white ´plane/helicopter on the left
HDRtour 1 year ago
@cosmo7652002 t doesn't, the plane tipped sideways so it wouldn't miss the buldng, whch made it seem like it disappeared, but it didn't, and you could see that it tipped clearly in other videos
Guzluvtaco8 5 days ago
The plane's wing disappears just before impact
CokeSupply 1 year ago
THE WING OF THE FAKE PLANES DISAPPEARED!! HAHAHA
yetaca 1 year ago
@yetaca it wasn't a fake plane,just watch "wtc second plane"
descontroladoxelrock 1 year ago
the audio somehow does not match the video. The sound is not of a plane nor the reaction of the observer i mean he reacts like 10 seconds before the impact??? and the plane engines doesnt really sound like a plane.. mhhh
cramtoro 1 year ago 2
@cramtoro It does, the camera is far away from WTC and sound is of course slower than light. You'll only hear it after some time. Well, the engines? I didn't hear any. Only an explosion. And I think you wanted to say AFTER the impact not BEFORE.
LithuanianGuitar 1 year ago
They certainly hired a very shit video editor to doctor this video. There's no fucking right wing.
richehh 1 year ago 2
1.the wing disappears
2. why is the underneath in shadow??
3. the front of the 'missile' pops out the other side and is clearly intact. some say this is to do with nose in nose out hoax etc. drives me mad. its clearly a missile tip. the nonbelievers who still insist airliners can do that choose to ignore that point wen you attempt to discuss it with them
mvpool 1 year ago
@mvpool I am not attempting to bash any opinions or points of view. But think about this... 1st: Missiles are supersonic weapons, most travel at up to 3 times the speed of sound. (Look up the footage) You would be lucky to catch a glimpse of it if it when by. 2nd if you believe the plane was digitally edited over a "slow" flying missile then surely you yourself could agree that editing a wingtip out of exsistence on film is not impossible. this is theorist propoganda. Rise above friend.
edgecrusher42483 1 year ago
@edgecrusher42483
why can't the missile be incorporated into a flying 'plane' ? quantum physics etc comes into it too
mvpool 1 year ago
@mvpool the missile being incorporated into the plane is possible. But then why use a missile? Missile warheads generally dont have a high amount of explosives. why not a bomb or crude bulk explosives in the cargo bay. The front landing assembly is made of Titanium. The forward enertia of a 500 Mph chunk of titanium surely would punch through a rather hollow building giving the effect that a projectile or missile warhead was punching out the other side.
edgecrusher42483 1 year ago
@edgecrusher42483 why is the 'thing' that punches through the other side perfectly rounded in shape?
mvpool 1 year ago
@mvpool Can you tell its perfectly rounded in shape from this video? it may be... but lets be honest. from this view you cant tell if its a missile tip or beverage cart. besides when missiles impact a target the nose is the first thing destroyed... it doesnt retain its "Perfectly round "shape and the missile body wouldnt make it out the other side because it would have been destroyed my the burst charge. Missiles are unlikely. but its a nice observation.
edgecrusher42483 1 year ago
@edgecrusher42483 it is 'round'. there is footage from other angles that also show this. it is uranium tipped and possibly shielded with quantum technology.
missiles travel at various speeds dependeding on the type.
whatever hit those buildings was not a passenger airliner.
just the illusion of one
mvpool 1 year ago
@mvpool im interested in this theory, i havnt heard it before. I only have some questions if you dont mind. 1st why use a uranium tipped, quantum physics protected penetrator when the building is basically hollow. A warhead like that would be used for earth bunkers or targets burried in mountain caves. It makes no sense to use that on an office building. 2nd. What do you mean the illusion of a passenger Airline? are you suggesting no planes hit the towers?
edgecrusher42483 1 year ago
@edgecrusher42483, Google: 911 close up
The article will tell you, Why they didn't use planes.
Sick3ninVend3tta 1 year ago
@Sick3ninVend3tta Ok, i read that article and my conclusion is; "I have lost faith in all humanity's ability to retain common sense" that was a strait up fantasy novel. Explain to me why there is an aircraft shaped hole in the sides of the buildings (Clearly visible after impact) What of the countless amateur video clips and eye witnesses to aircraft hitting buildings? Missiles travel at 2-3 times the speed of sound and would have left a small hole. not an aircraft shilouhette shape. FAIL!
edgecrusher42483 1 year ago
@edgecrusher42483, Edge, I can't explain on youtube the aircraft shaped holes in the sides of the buildings because I don't have the photographic evidence on here on me, only to suggest they were created by thermite, pre-plastered from the inside (particulary at WTC1)<<< Take note how "CLEAN CUT" the hole is, smooth edges. Again, I can't explain on here.
You can't give me one "credible" witness to any planes impacting. No missiles, No drones, no planes AT ALL 4 crash sites. I'm a no-planer.
Sick3ninVend3tta 1 year ago
@Sick3ninVend3tta Thermite does not leave clean cut holes! it is very volatile and melts metal in a liquid fashion. Do you really believe people would be sitting at their desks in the towers and not notice the tons of Thermite pods strapped to the walls? and the hole is instantly there after impact. Thermite would take at least 10 seconds to make the shape and sparks and smoke and flames would be raining out of the hole. There is a perfect clean cut silouhette because a PLANE hit the building!!!
edgecrusher42483 1 year ago
@edgecrusher42483, Nope, I'm not referring to the photos of the liquid metal pouring out of the side of the building. I'm referring to the impact holes. Thermite pods not needed, just thermite paint. Marvin P. Bush, the president's younger brother, was a principal in a company called Securacom that provided security for the World Trade Center. This means they had full access to the building's throughout the night. At WTC1 smoke and flames did rain out of the hole on impact. It was thermite.
Sick3ninVend3tta 1 year ago
@Sick3ninVend3tta I see, your a "Nano-Thermite" believer. Thermite paint is possible in theory, However, even if you found a way to ignite it, it does not generate enough Killojoules to flash incinerate metal. Look it up. It is proven that thermite paint cannot transfer enough heat for long enough to cause the effect you explain. On a mythbusters episode they used 1,000 lbs of thermite in an attempt to cut through a car... and guess what . it barely made it through the roof. Your dreaming friend
edgecrusher42483 1 year ago
@Sick3ninVend3tta im assuming you are refering to the photos of the liquid metal pouring out of the side of the building? i have seen these photos and video. Most suggest the use of thermite for the explaination due to Steel's low melting point. However, aluminum has a significantly lower melting point and there was tons of aluminum on site. The buildings outter frame, the AIRCRAFT fuselage, wings, engine parts... etc. No credible witnesses? all you need it eyes. and your credible. what else?...
edgecrusher42483 1 year ago
@edgecrusher42483
the concept of a standard smaller sized passenger airliner flying right through the twin towers, twice, goes against Newton's Laws of Motion.
So does the disappearance of the towers
mvpool 1 year ago
@mvpool Im affraid Newton's laws are clearly shown. Acceleration, equal and opposite reactions, and objects in motion remain in motion until an external force acts upon it. If the Airliner flew right through the twin towers as you suggest, then yes, that would defy Newton, But if you look closely... the plane explodes and does not continue through the building. The buildings dissapear from the skyline yes, but from the 20th story down, the cores are still standing. Visible in some footage.
edgecrusher42483 1 year ago
@edgecrusher42483 oh well, never mind, you are obviousy right and the laws of physics were altered that day. look up newtons laws and maybe you will grasp what i am saying.
mvpool 1 year ago
@mvpool I have looked up newtons laws, many times. I looked them up once more after your last comment to try and see your standpoint. But i only found that netons laws were clearly seen. Im confused on your claim. Do you care to speculate or explain a little better why you think newton was defied? Your reason was not clear at all. I only see you throw outrageous claims with zero proof. You never replied to my question of your Uranium tipped penetrator theory either. Why would that be needed?
edgecrusher42483 1 year ago
@edgecrusher42483
the uranium or the like tipped projectile has to be so because of newtons laws as normal planes don't slice through multiple construction grade steel columns and floor bars and reinforced concrete etc etc etc and then come out undamaged on the other side.
if a normal airliner hit it would have had impact and decelleration ultimately stopping with major front end damage.
i don't have the true answers to any of it, i didn't do it, but I know that what I see is illogical
mvpool 1 year ago
@mvpool The plane did not make it out the other side undamaged... it exploded! The outside of WTC werent all steel, they were aluminum and glass with 'some' steel and concrete etc etc. The plane was unable to make it through the steel cores. A 500Mph aircraft would not just hit and stop, like an egg against a brick wall. cars can plow clear through homes made of brick steel concrete etc. Its clear we see things differently. Good luck in your pursuit of the truth. Take care my friend.
edgecrusher42483 1 year ago
You hologram people are about as sharp as a wet loaf of bread. Search for September 11th 2001 Second Plane Crash Myers_clip6 posted by 911Crasting and tell me there aren't two wings.
Unbelievable people... get a clue.
ehole7 1 year ago
@ehole7
Get a clue? There are thousands of clues showing that this was a set-up. You are an ignorant bastard
clayton9610 1 year ago
it was just the wing coming out of the shadows of the smoke dumbasses. look at other videos and youll see.
jaymcd84 1 year ago
I'm fairly certain that they're saying "It's gone" as in, it didn't withstand the impact and will soon fall.
AngryOBrien 1 year ago
@wonderboy2402 what the hell are you talking about? go to my profile and watch the footage slowed down and zoomed in you will see your explanation doesn't make sense.
shakeycamerafilms 1 year ago
0:15 "That's a bomb"
0:17 :That's a bomb"
0:21 "That's a bomb"
clayton9610 1 year ago 9
@clayton9610 Maybe he wasn't looking at the point the plane hit just pointing his camera in the direction. Then he would turn around on hearing a bang; and one could easily think that that explosion is a bomb if you hadn't seen the plane. Even if he had seen the plane and said bomb, so what, does that make him 'in on it' and conclusive proof that there was a bomb? At the end of the day what people's reactions are to this is trivial and irrelevant in all the confusion and chaos of that day.
L0ND0NITE 10 months ago 2
@clayton9610 Yeah.... because some random person on the street with a camera is an expert. Get your head out of your ass.
zimmyzimgir2 1 week ago
I have a friend that lived by there ..she told me it was just like it showed..no BS..sorry your all nuts..this happen to US..THE USA ..we go fucked by some assholes out for blood
CaSurfLady 1 year ago
@CaSurfLady yea your own government. or do u still believe it was some muslim extremists like you were told?
conceptual0theorist 1 year ago
@conceptual0theorist Swet heart..you must not live here in the USA..I know this did happen to out world,,or would you like something like this to happen in your world?? the number of CHILDREN that died is not right..but most sick Mother F**KERS don't give a shit about life..or even a child..yes mulims extremists would kill there own mother..just becouse..life doesn't mean athing
CaSurfLady 1 year ago
@CaSurfLady i dont really understand ur ramblings. i said taht the usa government and insiders were responsible for nine eleven. thats all.
conceptual0theorist 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@conceptual0theorist ..please look how the rest of the world feels about extremists. killing a child is not right,,but muslim extremists would put a boom on a child to kill anyone else up.
CaSurfLady 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@conceptual0theorist @conceptual0theorist ..please look how the rest of the world feels about extremists. killing a child is not right,,but muslim extremists would put a boom on a child to kill anyone else up.
CaSurfLady 1 year ago
it also looks like a missile when the wing disappears
The wing does disappear and lighting is not the factor it is gone??
JohnKillrory 1 year ago
If you go to my account I've uploaded the video. I can't post it cus youtube doesn't let you post links in comments.
shakeycamerafilms 1 year ago
@shakeycamerafilms The tail fin also disappears and now it is so strange
The fullness of my dispensation has come because of the evil that our own government did to its own people.EVIL,EVIL,EVIL.6 6 6
JohnKillrory 1 year ago
I've zoomed in and slowed down the wing dissapearing. It's uploading now. When it's done I'll post a link here. It took me over an hour to find a program that would let me convert the .flv to enhance it lol.
shakeycamerafilms 1 year ago
hmmm wings dissapearing ...i see it as well...makes u wonder tho and bare with me just a second..u have all heard of project bluebeam yes? holograms? now how can a wing just dissapear on a real plane? it cant but suppose it was a hologram, and say a building got in the way of this holographic projection? that cud make a wing suddenly vanish? then boom!!! off go the bombs..just a thought
supastaaa100 1 year ago
I for one think that what happened that day is NOT what has been fed to us by the media.
But as for this wing I believe what we are seeing is the plane in the shadow of a building and that shadow moving further down the wing as it moved forward.
If you look at the :06 mark you can see the sun's reflection off the tip as it's in the sunlight now.
castro928 1 year ago
Don't forget the footage where you can clearly see the nose of the plane emerge out of the other side of the tower.
PopolVuh3 1 year ago
also... after the *Plane* hits.. watch the birds go across the screen...These birds are speeding!!! They look as if they're going as fast as a missile does... as the rest of the video proceeds the birds look like they're back to flying at normal speed.... anyone else?
tracehd1 1 year ago
@tracehd1 its because at that time the birds are flying the opposite direction that the car is going so it looks like they are flying. the next set of birds is going with the car so obviously they will look slower since they are keeping up
jmen1333 1 year ago
omg... that's incredible! wow It really does disappear. I cannot see where you would get Camera Glare to the point it could wipe out a whole wing! Great catch
tracehd1 1 year ago
focus in 0:06.
the wing is gone.
coolglock19 1 year ago
I didnt believe the "wing disappearing" comments until I paused it for myself before impact. I cannot help but ask, where DOES the right wing go just before impact? It visually fades out at first, and then in frames before impact it disappears completely!! Never noticed that before. Very odd.
SargentBlah 1 year ago
Once again "That's a bomb" at 0:20
clayton9610 1 year ago
OK at 0:18 I can hear someone saying "That's a bomb".
Now why would he say this when apparently a plane just flew into the building?
Anyone else hear it?
clayton9610 1 year ago 16
@clayton9610
It is more precisely at 0:17
clayton9610 1 year ago
@clayton9610 I think he said, "it's gone" - referring to the plane.
klax89 1 year ago
Comment removed
clayton9610 1 year ago
@clayton9610 The most plausible explanation is that the plane flew into the building so fast that they missed it.
lectrick 1 year ago
@lectrick
what the hell? No one has any common sense any more. Just like how my cock disappeared from pounding your mom too fast.
clayton9610 1 year ago
@clayton9610 Excellent troll. Because anyone without a nutsack for a brain would know that if this was some kind of hologram or post-video work that was done on a frame by frame basis, there's no fucking way they would miss including part of the wing for *multiple frames*. All of you are assholes.
lectrick 1 year ago
@lectrick
Shit son why don't you become a physics teacher? You seem to know all about it...
clayton9610 1 year ago
Comment removed
lectrick 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@clayton9610 Well, I majored in it. Owned?
lectrick 1 year ago
@clayton9610 So are you implying that it was a bomb? and not a plane that made the explosion? What of the tons of other footage that shows planes hitting them? this was shot from a moving vehicle, its not impossible to think the person was focusing on the road or the absolute chaos around them for that moment the plane hit. If i looked at abuilding with a fireball comming out of it, I would likely assume bomb as well
edgecrusher42483 1 year ago
@edgecrusher42483
It is also not even close to impossible to be able to edit a plane into a video. And even if the person was somehow not focusing on a fucking burning skyscraper, its funny how he manages to say that three times without hearing anyone say "um actually a plane just crashed into the building, did you not see it?"
clayton9610 1 year ago
@clayton9610 Hes in a moving car! how many people do you think are around to correct him? hes not on a city bus, or standing in a crowd of people. Like i said, its possible they werent watching the building when the plane hit, only heard the sound and looked over to see nothing but a fireball!
edgecrusher42483 1 year ago
@clayton9610 Probably wasn't looking and only heard the boom.
636Castle 1 year ago
@clayton9610
he wasn't looking at the building when the plane hit
utubenamex 1 year ago
at six seconds, the wing disappears.
pause it and look for yourself.
suedeslounge 1 year ago 2
Did someone walk in front of the hologram projector before the crash? God that's so annoying!
andrewh23 1 year ago
Strange, it seems to disappear a second before impact....
The right wing...
Project Blue beam... And where does this footage come from... Never seen it before!
gunkgrifter 1 year ago
Comment removed
gunkgrifter 1 year ago
I bet the "pilots" got a big surprise when they looked at the right wing just before impact.
"Oh great, now we're fsckd! This was not in my training manual."
lol, nice editing freaks...
edwargo 1 year ago 3
@edwargo Don't fighter planes get that turbulence / airflow effect on their wings when they do a hard turn... Might explain why the wing fades out into the background.
wonderboy2402 1 year ago
HOLOGRAPHIC TECHNOLOGY!! its gonna be hard for some to phatham what kinds of technology it took to do this.. soon this truth will be revealed to all....
NIKAREED 1 year ago
Doesn't sound like a jet airliner at all. Where the fuck does it's wing disappear to.
stig781 1 year ago
Has anyone noticed all the fake birds? watch them closely...edited in?
ant5681 1 year ago
@ant5681 they don't seem fake to me.. they are just coming from an area below the camera, they seem pretty real to me :)
pye333 1 year ago
Wow!! Yea what is up with the wings dissapearing???
911 Crasting - Where are all of these new vids coming from? Most people have never seen these differnt views before
Mildgreenwow 1 year ago
Huh?...
Where does the left wing & tail go before impact?.
Eh.
Sick3ninVend3tta 1 year ago
Comment removed
Crimee 1 year ago
@Sick3ninVend3tta same in this video recorded by someone else...wing disappears before impact. it is not because of tilting anything of the sort.
/watch?v=F-3-FE3-pio
it looks like the hologram failed before impact, lol.
Crimee 1 year ago
Fake ass stuff, man.
1. The wingtip is gone before the crash.
2. North face of the 1st tower is in sunlight. It's impossible. As most live shots showed.
LithuanianGuitar 1 year ago