The French instigated this revolution, stirred up the colonists. Everything the colonists demanded were given within a few weeks. They were already free - in the great British tradition. Like the French catholics in Quebec granted religious freedom when catholics in England were persecuted. It was a sibling quarrel with outside interference from the French dogs who only want to subverse British peoples and empire, Its only natural we should be friends with our siblings after the war is over,
@VioletDay3820 I know every other president is garbage.Im only 12,and as stupid as this may sound I hope to study his life,and discover many things we didnt know about him before.I think being the only kid in my class that does something educational is great!Its people like you who remind me people in the world are like me to actually still talk about him or make videos on him. :)
Thank you for helping me comment section now I know British were a country of europe that just wanted power over the american colonies and most people in the comment section are immature incest children that don't understand how people can change
@MrWeLikeYou only britain has kings, america is a bastard country incapable of producing royalty and russia killed their tsar....americans are also fat
@AngryBroomHandler. Sadly, in the US we too have people that breed with their cousins, aunts, uncles, mothers and fathers. The thing is, we don't call them royalty here. And, we certainly don't think that God gave them the right to rule over us.
north rules southerners are retarted, well then i guess im half retarted i live in northern minnesota but my mum and pop are from arkansaw but ya go north woot woot!!
I respect you yanks for fighting for independence, even if it was against my country. But for you guys out there who think we were stupid, think about how you'd like it if a country that had something you required revolted against you.
@hllbrngr1220 I hear you. Brits wore red coats along paths through the woods while Americans picked you guys off. In a sense the same thing is happening in afghanistan where the terrorists are hiding in villages with no uniforms. We are getting defeated there and the same thing happened to the Russians. One would think that they know this by now. Peace! From an American
Funny thing is though that the British withdrew! With the help of other superpowers such as the french and spanish. And i wont even mention what you did after the war!
i hate to be an ass....but at 1:05, where it says "intolerable acts" in quotations, the period is outside of the quotation.....the period goes inside the quotation marks, lol
@cherilemire01 canicatti massacre, biscari massacre,My Lai Massacre oh and who can't forget guantanamo bay all american war crimes and you can't call us brits sore losers when your country still claims it won the vietnam war
True, The brit trash is weak today. No longer does the brit empire exist, and they are sore losers which is why they complain and cry about it on youtube, Anyway great history Partner.
@TheLiberalKnight Be careful of what you wish for, we could easily fix the situation with the right President and people in congress. BTW, has a kabab lately?
@schaferhund11 Bullshit. You are bankrupt. And all of your money is owed to China. You are a sinking ship. And I'm happy that you are sinking, because you are always going on about how you are number one, always so fucking arrogant. I would want you to succeed, if you weren't so fucking arrogant and diplomatically rude.
@TheLiberalKnight We are going through hard times but we're not sinking. It's evil to wish harm to others and you will get it back ten fold. Plus, Europe is not doing to well either. Worry about your ownselves. The rudest, crudest and most arrogant people come from your country.
@schaferhund11 You are sinking. You are already bankrupt. All super powers have their downfalls. The Spanish empire, the French empire, the British empire. Now it is your turn, and China is taking over.
Europe is doing better than the USA is. The bankruptcy of Greece does not mean the bankruptcy of Europe, idiot. And I'm afraid the Americans are the most arrogant people on the earth. The British are too modest, actually. The French are more arrogant than us, you fat cow.
@TheLiberalKnight No, your markets are down 2.7% and your economy is sinking as well. You have debt as well but maybe your media doesn't tell you. British people are not modest, polite or have any manners. You have just proved it by calling me a fat cow. I've seen Brits on t.v. and you have nothing to be so haughty about, I'm afraid.
@schaferhund11 What the fuck, are you retarded or something? The British media is always reporting how badly the economy is doing 24/7, but actually we're doing a lot better than America is. For example, we've actually got a deficit reduction plan, that involved spending cuts rather than the failed keyesian methods of Obama. What you see on TV is not proof of anything, you stupid pratt. Read the figures. British obesity pales in comparision to the fat boys in the States!
@TheLiberalKnight I know the figures. Britain is the 2nd fattest country in Europe. And if you economy is so bad, why laugh at ours? Is is that it makes you feel better to demean others? That is another British trait that is really bad.
@schaferhund11 2nd fattest in Europe... that isn't saying much by todays standards. Our real health problem is our teeth, which is a correct stereotype, just like the Americans are fat correct stereotype.
Our economy is doing badly, but not nearly as badly as yours, relative to the sizes. You came within 100 hours of bankruptcy, and you are still bankrupt because of private sector debt. We have not come close to that position yet. The English are arrogant to the Scots, nobody else.
LOL. You wanna know WHY America won it's freedom? Because France helped you. They had Cornwallis surrounded at Yorktown and were supplying America with training and weapons. Not only that, but Britain was fighting France on the continent as well as maintaining colonies in India.
America did not "dominate" anything more americans died than british. They were inferior to the British army and that was demonstrated when you tried to invade Canada in 1812. We burned your capital to the ground.
the tide of the American revolution was turned by the Continental Army before the French arrived.
The fact that youre able to admit that you were defeated by a French army in the Americas is even funnier. Youd rather admit to loosing to them than Americans. I take pride in that.
@USMarineRifleman0311 Damn right, a nation that covered 1/3 of the world and the largest and best navy in the world isn't gonna be defeated by one with no structured navy
The tide turned once france joined in until that time britain was kicking your arse all over the place
You also had the Dutch republic and Spain helping you too :)
@USMarineRifleman0311 Simple fact is that America owes its independence to France. France bankrolled the revolution, bankrupted itself for American Independence, gave the Colonist the weapons and ammunition needed to fight a proper war, and tied up the Royal Navy around the world. Without that the Revolution would never have succeeded. So even though the French army didn't do much fighting in North America the French were still a major - if not the main - reason why the revolution succeeded.
@USMarineRifleman0311 Alright. So explain this me to me. If France hadn't paid for and provided the vast majority of the war material that the Colonists used to fight Britain how exactly could the Colonist's rebellion succeed? I dont doubt their desire to fight nor their ability once given the material to do but the capacity to aquire that material without French aid didn't exist. Without France the Colonist rebellion would have ended the same way as the Confederates rebellion, crushing failure.
@USMarineRifleman0311 It's like Britain in the Second World War. Britain wanted to fight on but lacked the means to provide itself with the material it needed to fight on so turned to American. Without American made material Britain could not have contintued to resist the Germans and would have had to negotiation a cease fire and capitulate. So American made material was a major reason why Britain could fight on in that war, not the only reason but a major reason.
@USMarineRifleman0311 According to you should I then completely disregard the contribution of the American's to WW2 prior to their entry to the conflict as a combatant as having no baring whatsoever on the war simply because they were only providing the means fight but weren't fighting themselves?
What a bunch of bullshit. This whole fucking senseless war could have been avoided if it weren't for Bush's incessant greed. WAKE UP, AMERICA. OIL SPEAKS. AND IT'S SAYING "DEMONS OF THE WORLD, START WARS OVER ME. HUMAN LIVES ARE EXPENDABLE AND MONEY IS HAPPINESS." God Damn America.
The forefathers of the United States of America, who fought so hard to put it on the map, would be disgusted to hear about what their country has become today.
The forefathers cared less about "putting the usa on the map" They cared about freedom, You are a scumbag for putting words in the Founding Fathers mouths, You should be spat on.
@PenkemperK9 Excuse me, you fucking peon? YOU'RE calling ME a scumbag? You're the scumbag for attacking me when I said nothing wrong to anybody. And, according to you're logic, you're the scumbag who is putting words into the forefathers' mouths, being so sure that they never cared about making a new country. Regardless of their motives, they fought to make a new country, a country where freedom could reign. So you're also wrong; you are a wrong, narcissistic, scumbag. YOU should be spat on.
Trenton, Princeton, Saratoga. The big three that turned the tide before the French ever considered fighting. Btw, the early US Navy never lost at sea, it even managed to raid English ports and capture a number of its HMS ships.
The French joined in for Yorktown and that was it. If you want to talk about a defeat, look up New Orleans 1815.
@USMarineRifleman0311 Don't try and twist history with your American bullshit propaganda because it only works with other yanks.The french funded the war for the Americans but the yanks was losing a lot more battles than they won till the french got involved and if we would of stopped that french fleet in the channel you would of remained a colony.The French troops on the ground out numbered you 4 to1.It was all their tactics, strategy on the battlefield by general Rochembeau .A French victory
@USMarineRifleman0311 The 1812-15 war you come real close to becoming a colony .We fighting Napoleon at the time so our main force was fighting in Europe and we still kicked your asses and burnt down the white house.The Yanks tried taking Canada but got their asses handed to them and when we finished beating up the French in Europe all eyes was focused on America with our main force.This is when America wanted peace.You came close to being recolonised
@USMarineRifleman0311 We did what we had to do our job was a success we won the hearts and minds.The British armed forces had been doing the same job for the last 30yrs in N.Ireland we knew what we was doing.The Yanks on the other hand were losing men left right and centre have no experience with places like that they were sitting ducks.The British Armed forces are small thats why we can train the to be top notch unlike the yanks which is that big it can't train it's troops properly there shit
Im sorry once again but hearts and minds were not won in 2007. Most of the people were pissed about your presence and tactics (remember the protests? the molotovs? lol) No experience yanks up north were surging, no experience yanks took and held the Sunni triangle, no experience yanks never trained in ireland against protesters. Neither did the Iraqi Army and they took Basrah back. You dont train tougher, thats a myth, your PFT is on par with our Navy's, 1.5mile run only.
poor quality us soldiers you speak of, took Basrah in 2003 and every other city in that country. Even poorer quality were the IA and their 4 divisions held it till present day. We just couldnt find hi quality troops to hold that place for us.
@USMarineRifleman0311 The British Military took Basra with ease.The British Military are superior trained but this is because it is small so they get round to given each high Quality training the American Military is big and either they are poorly trained or more likely it is that big they don't get round to training the all up to standard.You have finance,Man power and technology(All made by Europeans may i add) but in man to man combat the Yanks isn't all that good
Please shut the fuck up. You dont have quality. British soldiers run 1.5 miles for their fitness test = same as our sailors. They dont train in 120deg heat of the Mojave desert prior to being deployed. Numbers is what wins battles, thats exactly the reason your countrymen gave way to the taliban offensive of 2007.
The US spearhead was led by 7th Armored, they took Basrah in 2003, no UK forces were on point. Yanks took Basrah and left it in the hands of the Brits...
@USMarineRifleman0311 The British army is by far more superior trained and professional than the Yanks like most European armies are.Even in Our navy our Marines are by far more superior than the U.S marines but really we shouldn't compare because the Royal Marines are Commando's while the US marines are just infantry unless they are selected to Marine recon but The RM are already at that standard.Para's,Gurkha's,all the guards regiments are all elite infantry given superior training
oh yea elite super duper paratrooper training saves you from bullets? dream on kid.
Your troops dont train in the Mojave desert under 125 deg heat. You dont run as far as we do. You dont shoot as far as we do. And we....dont give ground to insurgent offensives.
Last time the british were in Iraq they surrendered a whole division to the ottomans, they came back to give up basrah to the ancestors of the same ottomans they lost to in 1915.
you can train all you want, but you lost ships and a whole country our early military. Right now 300 million US citizens learn annually about your loss in the New World. Same with a billion Indians.
@USMarineRifleman0311 We never lost the War of Independence to the Rebels we lost it to France plus Most people fighting on the American side we're British anyway it was more like a civil war
The British string of defeats started with Lexington and Concord....the tide turned during the Prussian surrender of Trenton. then went onto Princeton, Saratoga, Cowpens Monmouth...siege of Boston ending...it was all downhill before the French arrived.
@USMarineRifleman0311 You're really have been brainwashed by American propaganda haven't you.Well history shows that you was losing more battles than you won and you would of remained a COLONY if it wasn't for France.If you was winning the war why did you seek help from France??? because you was losing the fight that's why.Even the Spanish also claim their part in the war of independence
@USMarineRifleman0311 But Europe Canada and the Commonwealth are not so gullible than the brain washed Yanks and we have British,French and Spanish historians all in agreement
gullible? the french fuckers arrived during the last years of the war, helping us trap the last of the british troops at yorktown. Most of the troops they landed in 1780 were inactive.
The only thing they did better than we couldve was they blocked off the escape route to the sea. Worst of all is Yorktown wasnt even a battle. 75%+ of the british force surrendered. Look up the term turning point + Saratoga, see what comes up
@USMarineRifleman0311 LOL Stop twisting history with your American propaganda.The world knows without the French you would of remained a colony.Just be thankful we didn't stop that french fleet in the channel.Because if we did you'd never would never of gain independence they was even paying the American troops you became French mercenaries
I still think the most effective fleets ever assembled was the one at Dunkirk 1940. Its amazing how fast people will row with Stukas coming down on them.
@1stLordTheAdmiralty1 british were begging americans after battle of britain for money to rebuild their shitty isle -cuz the nazis owned them so much, even though they didnt invade -they made you eat shit and you went to USA as ALWAYS hahahahhahahahahahaha UK=FULL OF ISLAND IDIOTS HAHAHAHAHHAHAHA sorry !!!!!!!
@MrWeLikeYou Vietnam. Korea. American colonial wars in which the pathetic American army was humiliatingly destroyed by local natives, and ones which Britain or France had won for 300 years. The American army is a joke. Full of crybabies and wimps.
@TheLiberalKnight Vietnam us won that war, we won the Tet offensive after that the Vietcong was wiped out unlike this war where we outright defeated you and just like in Korea which was a stalemate the North Vietnamese promised not to attack South Vietnam and unlike Korea we never attempted to invade the north our goal was to defend it and we did only later when we pulled out the NVA then invaded the south and was successful. so no We won Vietnam, learn your history idiot
@VanOstrum No, you lost in Vietnam. You went in with the intention of unifying Korea under the South Korean republican regime. You left, a decade later, after thousands of US deaths, without achieving your goal. It doesn't matter how many battles you won- YOU LOST IN VIETNAM. Deal with it!
@TheLiberalKnight little history lesson. At first the VC like we in this war a great run with their hit and run tactics, but eventually the Americans and their allies had developed anti Guerrilla warfare teams which made it harder and harder fot the VC to fight in the jungle, So their plan was for the VC to fight in the open warfare, to attack 10 towns(They could not hold one town) and also to start a general up rising, non of these objectives did they accomplish
@TheLiberalKnight No the North Vietnamese did not achieve any of their goals in the tet offensive and they failed military as well because they could not hold one town both military and starting a general uprising they failed at we successfully defended South Vietnam and the North promised that they would not attack the South only later after the US already pulled out of Vietnam did the North about 2 years later did the North invade without our help. In no way is this a US defeat.
@VanOstrum What the fuck are you talking about here? Are you talking about Vietnam or Korea? A minute ago you were talking about Korea, in this comment you only talked about Vietnam.
@TheLiberalKnight i don't know why you bring up the Korean war that was a stalemate which pitted massive firepower vs massive numbers like in the eastern war in ww2 "American colonial wars? I seem to remember Battle of the Monongahela which was mainly a British fuck up given the fact they were to stubborn to adapt to the natives tactics which by the way the British were cowering about while the Virginia militia at least knew how the Indians fought.
@TheLiberalKnight As for the revolution 80 percent of the forces fighting the British were Americans, the French came later with only 10000 french troops in north america US won many key battles before the French joined in the fighting, France played a huge role but mostly because of their proxy war, the British forces counting British, Germans, and loyalists outnumbered us about 2 to one you also had better equipment supplies tech, training etc despite this the British failed failed
@TheLiberalKnight saying the French won this war would be like saying the British Americans won the European war in ww2 because we supplied the USSR even tho 93 percent of the Germans died in the eastern front. now yes we would of lost with out french support but it was mainly a US victory.despite outnumbering Americans 2 to 1 and and having a powerful army the British lost to an army Full of "crybabies and wimps" if you are gonna bash Americans at least know what your talking about.
@TheLiberalKnight And Korea was a stalemate its a surprise you do not know that, our main goal was to defend the South yes later it changed to uniting the Koreans but than the Chinese crossed the border and pushed us back the border, still they also had goals of uniting the Koreas and they failed, remember the war ended with the US and its allies pushing the Chinese and Koreans past the border, The war was a stalemate
@VanOstrum That's not the point, America should have won in Korea. It was a stalemate, but there was no reason why America, who had become a new super power, couldn't have won against the Chinese. The Chinese outnumbered you, but your technology was far superior. Any other country could have won it if they had access to the sort of military technology that the Americans had.
@TheLiberalKnight " The Chinese outnumbered you, but your technology was far superior" again idiot history you lack, Remember the Eastern war? you also had firepower vs numbers and in that case numbers proved better, so yes I think numbers compensate also in the beginning of the war and also when China joined our soldiers our supply lines were overstretched and our troops were not even prepared for a war in the winter by the time the Chinese joined in.
@TheLiberalKnight I know that i may seem to be saying the same thing over and over but that's only because you will not listen when we withdrew from Vietnam is was because we made the North promise not to attack the South again and they did than we left and then after we left and did not care so much to enforce it than the North Vietnamese invaded, so had nothing to do with us. you know nothing of history so do not bother debating either your dumb and can not read or just bias.
@TheLiberalKnight I this you should get over the fact that you were defeated in this war, both politically and military unlike Vietnam which was just a political loss, after we won the Tet offensive we should have just invaded the North. we also never had the goal to unite Vietnam, so unlike Korea this was a victory, still I do have to say it was a political loss but that's about it
@VanOstrum You're talking about the American revolution now?
No, I really don't care that the French and Spanish defeated us in the American revolution. Because your loss improved our economy. All of our money was coming from the Carribean; the American colonies were unproductive and hugely expensive.
You lost in Vietnam! You went there to remove communism in their political system! You FAILED! Get over it!
@TheLiberalKnight Do you know how to read? Vietnam was not a FAIL they LOST THE TET OFFENSIVE, THEY FAILED TO START A GENERAL UPRISING,THE VIETCONG WAS WIPED OUT, AND THEY FAILED TO HOLD ALL THE TOWNS THEY ATTACKED THAT = LOSS ON THEIR PART, ONLY LATER 2 YEARS AFTER WE LEFT, AND MADE THE NORTH VIETNAMESE PROMISE NOT TO ATTACK THE SOUTH AGAIN DID THEY INVADE IT WAS A SECOND CIVIL WAR NOT EVEN THE SAME WAR WE FOUGHT IN DID THE NORTH INVADE THE SOUTH, HAD NOTHING TO DO WITH US? HISTORY BOOK IDIOT.
@TheLiberalKnight like I said before, most of the forces fighting the British were Americans not French, we won many key battles before they fought with us, you outnumbered us and had better tech, supplies, equipment. does not matter if the British did not care to us under their control fact is they failed.
@TheLiberalKnight "You went there to remove communism in their political system!" no idiot we wanted to contain communism and only defend the South, nor did we ever invade the North, in defending Vietnam we did achieved that goal we won the tet offensive, and the North Vietnamese promised not to attack the south again, and then we left, than 2 years later with out US support then the South lost. so no Vietnamese becoming unified had nothing to do with us.
@VanOstrum Oh really? The Americans were merely defending themselves in the cold war? Your naiivity is hilarious. What do you think marshall aid was for? It was to rebuild capitalist economies in Europe before people became attracted to communism. Do you even know what the cold war was about? America was fighting for capitalism, and that meant going into Vietnam. You lost in Vietnam! Just accept it!
@TheLiberalKnight Look you do not seem to get the point, yes the US wanted South Vietnam under their their realm of influence, but not the North, the US never declared war on the North, nor did it have any plans to invade the North ever heard of the policy of containment? we wanted to contain communism,We gave up fighting for capitalism after we won the tet offensive and North Vietnam promised not to attack the South again, than we withdrew, when North Vietnam won, we were gone for 2 years
@VanOstrum This is the biggest piss-take ever. Look, Britain was owned in Signapore. France was owned in Canada. America was owned in Vietnam! Just deal wih it!
You're making up the most hilarious lies in order to justify the Americans pulling out after 10 years without achieving a single military objective!
@TheLiberalKnight Uhh do you realize what this video is? Its about the American Revolution, not about the wars you are bitching about. Go on a tribute to the men who died in Nam and go bitch there.
@TheLiberalKnight We lost because of radical hippies and Nixions corruption not because of the milltary but phillies right is has nothing to do with the video.
@Mikelovesham90 How the hell did radical hippies and Nixions force defeat on the Americans? I didn't see them blocking the use of Napalm in Vietnam! Lol.
Thanks for the weapons and all but it was out of pure self interest obviously and we have paid for them now so shut up about it! Haha. I don't get the competition, there isn't one. Britain was the world super power but that was a long, long, long time ago. Now i'm happy the US is as it is our powerful ally. You know a lot of Europe and Asia is still a bit annoyed with us for the whole trying to take over the world thing. Seriously though, arguing over the revolutionary wars is so so silly.
Yes, US helped us immeasurably with weapons but it was QUITE CLEARLY in self interest, not because we're chums- you really didn't want Germany sweeping over everything. Some Americans talk about WWII like it was a big favour you did the world, it's ridiculous. Still, I don't get all these arguments about our two countries, I don't see how it relates now. We were the worlds primary super power, that has looooong gone. The US are now the super power, that is now fading too but I don't want it to
Though I have to say SOME Americans have an insufferably arrogant, ignorant and narrow minded view of WWII. I mean literally talking about it like some sill Hollywood film where the cavalry comes in right at the end, oh how fucking glorious. It is pretty harsh on the millions upon millions of people who died fighting the Nazis! Most of Europe fell and Britain stood alone, if we had been taken then the US would've had a right old fight on its hands and with no allies.
Idiots think of this as a war between the United States and The United Kingdom but it's a bit of a silly view. The colonies were mostly Brits, they quite rightly grew tired of King George and his tyrannical regime, unreasonable nature and lack of concessions. Generally the colonies had an affinity with their distant motherland but were pushed into this war- from which the United States was then born. Stop it with this stupid US vs UK mentality please! Even with WW2!? We were allies yeah?
Bizzare arguments between horrendously misinformed people- YEAH we kicked your asses in revolutionary war, yeah well were kicking your asses in 1812, yeah well saved the world in WWII.... JESUS, gimme a break will ya? Losing the 13 colonies wasn't that much of a hindrance, the UK wasn't making much money from it. There were far more benefits to be had from trading with the new nation, this then allowed Britain to concentrate of Europe, Africa and Asia. So what is with these arguments?
God, discussions on pages such as this are so silly! Americans seem to think Brits still care about these wars and the declaration of independence! Rather daft, it isn't even taught as standard in our schools, in history or any other lesson. It is a far, far, far more significant event for Americans obviously, bloody hell I bet if you asked a lot of Brits on the street, especially younger ones, they wouldn't even know America was born from British colonies. They should of course !
no the reason great britian lost is because the americans were being badasses and attacking in the forests and while they were asleep. so fuck you great britain stop crying about something that happend 250 years ago
It's amazing that the American's started the war with some big disadvantages like no navy, while Britain had the best navy in the world at the time, but America still ended up victorious.
@rudewolf89 if you knew anything the only reason the british lost was because of the french helping out the resistence, they came in from behind, the americans would of never taken us down, youd been fighting for independence for 200years and then ytou finally got it when the french came in behind us.
@SandNBones If you haven't noticed, it WAS a revolution because your British ancestors never learned how to respect their colonies and The United States of America became a independent country and nation, striving to be the absolute opposite of our old English government system run by a king or queen. And not even half of America today is English. Plus.. France got to America in the last 2 months of the war.. we were obviously winning then..
@RoyalRyno4 France aided the Americans as early as '76 via goods and arms thru the Dutch West Indies - by '78 the a treaty was signed after the defeat of the British at Saratoga - more money etc came our way -
Blame your loss on France or Spain, a victory is a victory, look at us now, we are more powerfuk than you and there isnt shit your country can do about it. Stop talking about what would have happend and just live with you horrible military skills. Even if we would have lost, your country would not keep this land for long, your army is weak and that will never change, you will forever be picked on by smaller countries, its the nature or being umskilled and weak.
@flamingaxe791 All i can say is you are a retard that thinks the USA has always been a great country and denies to believe the country's real history. I am British and i do not hate the USA.
Dont blame your loss on the French navy, while fighting on American soil, for every 1 American that you killed we killed 35 Brittish soldiers, it was a pretty pathetic loss. Not to mention the we are the worlds super power now and Brittian is only number 8. Just be glad we sided with you in WW1 because if we were enemies the nuclear bomb would have landed on British soil and you would belong to France.
The Brittish should be ashamed to have lost the way they did, you see the difference between our to countries is America takes war seriously, we fight for prosparity and freedom, you fight because you are paid to do so. We also dont see value in using tax payer money to pay for a "royal families" personal wedding. See bull shit like that is the reason why we kick your countries ass to become the most powerful and technically advanced country that this world has ever seen.
@flamingaxe791 I wanted to sit here and pick apart your arguments one by one by when I saw you claim that "for every 1 American that you killed we killed 35 Brittish soldiers" I realised it would be pointless.
@SandNBones You guys are the biggest dumbas on Earth. America was winning the war 3 years after Lexinton and Concord. The French never fought on American soil. NEVER. They provided blockades and naval bombardments of English forts. I don't know who you think you Brits are.. just because you controlled 1/4 of the world at one point, doesn't mean you are or were top shit, you lost all of you colonies anyways dipshit.
No matter who kicked who asses in whichever war way back when, it remains an undeniable fact that the modern day US Britain Alliance/Friendship is arguably the strongest alliance in existence. I personally bear no resentment whatsoever toward modern day Brits for actions that occurred hundreds of years ago.
That being said, asking for mutual understanding on a Youtube video is like asking for a small miracle. But whatever. You're awesome Britan/England/UK.
@DannyCro10 The only reason that that alliance is powerful is because the US supplies all the force. We could be without the UK and France and would hardly feel any difference in our military might, they need us to protect them, we dont need them for shit...
@stupidfleshmonkies the UK royal navy is the most highly trained and skilled mitary force in the world you dumb fuck and it is the US that keeps asking our country to help them at war eg. Gulf war, Afganistan, Iraq and Vietnam
The only war we rejected to help you in was Vietnam and you lost
@DaleWF10 Lol go on, keep deluding yourself into thinking that...Maybe 300 years ago the Royal Navy was all powerful, but in todays day and age, the US Navy Dominates the seas, and the US air force dominate the sky. We don't keep asking you to help, you tag along so you can reap what we sow you freaking leeches. Last, the "loss" in Vietnam was because there was not support at home, it was a political loss, militarily we won. Its the exact same in Afghanistan.
@stupidfleshmonkies Whatever retard, your marines come over to the UK gain more skiils on a regular basis and your army was in Vietnam 20 years and ended up loosing even though Vietnam was a third world country
In 1982 the UK won the falklands war on our own within 2 months right on the doorstep of the bigger nation Argentina
Asif you actually think the UK helps you in war on there own wishes by tagging along you must be on a whole different level of stupid
US Marines in UK for training? when? why would we ship our own to get 2nd rate EU training since we have more combat experience and a different infantry doctrine.
Please dont compare a little police action like the fuckin Falklands to an actual land war in Asia lol
Tagging with EU forces in Afghan and Iraq has brought nothing to us than the loss of Basrah and a stalemate in Helmand. We have recieved jack and shit in the cooperation, instead, we took over both AOs
@USMarineRifleman0311 Is there really a need for you to demean forces of a foreign country to praise your own? The US is a powerful nation & an effective military force on it own but you all seem to have this inferiority complex where you cant for one moment admit that any other nation at any point in history might have been even half as effective in battle as any American unit. You people wonder why even your own Allies dont like you when your insulting their people and spitting on their help.
@USMarineRifleman0311 How would like it if someone came here and start slagging of the American miltiary? Saying that no matter what help you provided them, no matter what the situations were in the conflict, no matter how many you troops died in a war that really had nothing to do with you but you joined to help and Allie that you contribution was worthless, you troops was useless did nothing to help out in anyway. You'd be deeply insulted wouldn't you? So grow up and be a little respectful.
Basrah fell under the pressure of the US spearhead, our forces were going northwards anyways. We left the British down there so they could get the occupying sooner. Which they did terribly to begin with. The militia in Basrah was paid off so the UK forces could get a safe passage to the airport alone. If you havent noticed, Iraq was a US war, we handled 95% of the fighting and occupying, we didnt evacuate hot zones, we stuck around and won..I was there
the US Marine Corps itself (my service) lost less troops in Iraq than the 11th Royal Marine battalion lost during three raids, Zeebrugge 1918, Tobruk 42 and Dieppe the next year.
Needless to say Dieppe was their last stop. The ones that werent killed were captured wounded on the beach, not by the SS but by foreign conscript Wehrmacht troops.
@DannyCro10 Britain is the geographical name of island which contains the countries of England, Scotland and Wales the United Kingdom is a union of the countries England, Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland
@SandNBones dude, like i keep saying, if the english were kicking our asses so badly there would have been a surrender so please stop being bitter about the fact that u lost (twice) and france saving us? the french couldnt save themselves in WW1 or WW2 and the russians would not have won, they lost 26 million soldiers while America and England lost roughly 500,000 give or take, trust me they wouldnt have won.
What rly still gets me is why the UK just simply 'gave' Australia away It's easy to say they had learned their lesson from the US Rev War, but (I don't have any data to support this claim) the UK would have crushed any Australian reistance like a bug. Did they realise how much shit we have in the ground here? The British were too kind! I would've got hardcore! Conquering territory,expanding the empire.. that s*** gets me hard! and just give it all back? SCREW THAT!? lol
I am an old man who was raised with several brothers, me being the oldest. We used to fight each other, but woe unto the guy who picked on one of my brothers. I really think countries are a lot like that. The US, England, Wales, Scotland, Ireland, Canada, Australia and New Zealand have always seemed like brothers or at least cousins to me. I just hope we get along better in reality than what shows on these sites. We really need each other. You guys who want to pick fights think about that.
@SandNBones if the english were kicking our ass so bad then y wasnt there a surrender?..the french didnt really come into the equation untill 1781, 6 years after lexington! if the english military was so big and bad they would have crushed the rebelion, and in WW1 and WW2 we saved the french and basically europe we never treated them like shit.so if your gunna search american history vids i would appreciate it if you got your facts straight before you started talking shit u arrogant limy prick.
sorry, AMERICA saved France? WHEN DID THAT HAPPEN!?
America declared war on Japan, never attacked one german soldier (75% of entire army fighting USSR), and then, when Japan surrendered due to their entire army (NOT navy) crushed in China. Then, they had the nerve to atomic bomb a SURRENDERED nation.
That is downright despicable. Nothing in history compares to what America did.
@WolfytheWolf5667 are you some type of dumba** America declared war on japan and then Germany declared war on America to say America never fought against Germany is like saying America didn't beat the Russians in the 1980s Olympics hockey. U ever heard of D day. as for us bombing japan after they surrendered you clearly don't know history the atomic bomb was the thing that made japan surrender . i like how you say Americans don't know about history but you just got the entire war wrong
Actually after the bombing of Pearl Harbour, the Japanese sent the declaration of war.
Japan surrendered in China when their ARMY was destroyed by Chinese.
D-Day? so what? WE HAD THAT PLANNED OUT. America's trying to take the credit.
GRANTED, you did well in the pacific providing manpower to fight those disgusting Imperials, but the entire war was mainly won by Yugoslavia which slowed down Hitler with a million men, they died, but the USSR killed Germany afterwards.
the british plans for anything amphibious since Gallipoli to Dieppe convinced the world that an invasion of a hostile beachhead would never again be possible. You couldnt take a beachhead from Turks for fucks sake.
To make things worse, after the Arnhem fiasco, your contribution the western front were 3x smaller than that of the mobilized US forces.
To all the people who say the US didnt do anything(mainly birts) please get your facts right. Yes, France and Spain helped but thats because they hated England, and they didnt enter the war untill the end. And dont forget the war of 1812 there was no intervention from any other nation that was pure US vs. England and the US won. People say were arrogant but truth is you are, u search american revoloutionary vids. and then starty talking shit cuz ur sore losers. We won u lost get on with it.
@12qwas456 The War of 1812 was not won by the US, if anything it was a draw. The British didn't want war after almost 50 uninterupted year of conflict with France, the Canadians only wanted to protect their homes from a hostile invader, Tecumseh wanted an independent confederation of Indian tribes and America wanted some respect - only Tecumseh failed to get what he wanted so the clear outcome was that the Indians lost...big time.
@12qwas456 Britain did invade America in the War of 1812. Britain invaded Michigan and took control of Detroit for a year, invaded Maryland and burnt Washington DC, invaded New York several times and burnt Buffalo, invaded Alabama and captured Mobile, even the Battle of New Orleans was fought to oppose a British invasion of Louisiana.
Nice content!
Andj3w 1 week ago
This has been flagged as spam show
BRITISH XEBOPHOBES AGAINST VS ANGLO-JEWISH INTERNATIONALS
unfukkkmee 2 weeks ago
Comment removed
liamwitdre 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
The French instigated this revolution, stirred up the colonists. Everything the colonists demanded were given within a few weeks. They were already free - in the great British tradition. Like the French catholics in Quebec granted religious freedom when catholics in England were persecuted. It was a sibling quarrel with outside interference from the French dogs who only want to subverse British peoples and empire, Its only natural we should be friends with our siblings after the war is over,
L36Bruno 1 month ago
Haha America lost
Peppepoppldoppl 1 month ago
@VioletDay3820 Thank you so much!
Operation116 2 months ago
@VioletDay3820 I know every other president is garbage.Im only 12,and as stupid as this may sound I hope to study his life,and discover many things we didnt know about him before.I think being the only kid in my class that does something educational is great!Its people like you who remind me people in the world are like me to actually still talk about him or make videos on him. :)
Operation116 2 months ago
@VioletDay3820Seriously!Why would he be a cannible he was the only perfect human ever in my mind.
Operation116 2 months ago
Has anyone heard of George Washington being a cannible.Fucking lies!Who would say such a thing!
Operation116 2 months ago
Thank you for helping me comment section now I know British were a country of europe that just wanted power over the american colonies and most people in the comment section are immature incest children that don't understand how people can change
123eee555 2 months ago
this a 88, 6 6 6 veiws
ViralVideosVampire 2 months ago
hahaha they destroyed all their tea. take that british pussies
michiman57 2 months ago
i dont like how this writing in this video comes out one letter at a time as if u were typing it. it hurts the eyes.
moreruffles89 2 months ago
Comment removed
jake9789 3 months ago
the british build a country and the rebels steal it
AngryBroomHandler 4 months ago
@AngryBroomHandler hahhahahahahahhahahahhahaha good joke hahahahahahhahahaha who saved your asses in ww2 against the nazis ???AHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH :D
MrWeLikeYou 3 months ago
@MrWeLikeYou many thanks to our RUSSIAN allies for winning the war in europe HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA
AngryBroomHandler 2 months ago
@AngryBroomHandler russian and american are kings while british or french are BIGGEST PU****YS
MrWeLikeYou 2 months ago
@MrWeLikeYou only britain has kings, america is a bastard country incapable of producing royalty and russia killed their tsar....americans are also fat
AngryBroomHandler 2 months ago
@AngryBroomHandler. Sadly, in the US we too have people that breed with their cousins, aunts, uncles, mothers and fathers. The thing is, we don't call them royalty here. And, we certainly don't think that God gave them the right to rule over us.
TheTruepatriot1776 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@MrWeLikeYou many thanks to our RUSSIAN allies for winning the war in europe HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA
AngryBroomHandler 2 months ago
this sucks
huntbug1 4 months ago
north rules southerners are retarted, well then i guess im half retarted i live in northern minnesota but my mum and pop are from arkansaw but ya go north woot woot!!
MrDpms223 4 months ago
@MrDpms223 Don't generalize, not all people from the south are retarded. My Dad is from the south and he's smart.
schaferhund11 3 months ago
I respect you yanks for fighting for independence, even if it was against my country. But for you guys out there who think we were stupid, think about how you'd like it if a country that had something you required revolted against you.
Iraq..........
hllbrngr1220 5 months ago
@hllbrngr1220 I hear you. Brits wore red coats along paths through the woods while Americans picked you guys off. In a sense the same thing is happening in afghanistan where the terrorists are hiding in villages with no uniforms. We are getting defeated there and the same thing happened to the Russians. One would think that they know this by now. Peace! From an American
gkale1 5 months ago
“WE THE PEOPLE” HAVE LOST THEIR ONCE PROUD NATION TO A BUNCH OF ZIONIST CROOKS.
AMERICAN SECOND REVOLUTION NOW!!! BEFORE IT’S TOO LATE!!!
FantomasXZ7 5 months ago
@FantomasXZ7 KEEP THE MOVEMENT GOING GOD. REVOLUTIONARY STATUS.
maresasules 5 months ago
1:11
why are all the S'es F's?
stfuimpaul 5 months ago
@stfuimpaul Different font back then, the s's look like what we consider to be f's today.
triplebaseball 5 months ago
Funny thing is though that the British withdrew! With the help of other superpowers such as the french and spanish. And i wont even mention what you did after the war!
Symmonso96 6 months ago
Comment removed
NastyyRush 6 months ago
@NastyyRush
You're a nutcase lol, We're never going to face our government in our lifetime. But we might have to face the brit trash once again in the future.
RUPERTDOUGLAS90 6 months ago
i hate to be an ass....but at 1:05, where it says "intolerable acts" in quotations, the period is outside of the quotation.....the period goes inside the quotation marks, lol
dlawso77 6 months ago
@cherilemire01 canicatti massacre, biscari massacre,My Lai Massacre oh and who can't forget guantanamo bay all american war crimes and you can't call us brits sore losers when your country still claims it won the vietnam war
callumdcommunist 6 months ago
@cherilemire01 America does that all the time.
videowithmeaning 6 months ago
@cherilemire01
True, The brit trash is weak today. No longer does the brit empire exist, and they are sore losers which is why they complain and cry about it on youtube, Anyway great history Partner.
RUPERTDOUGLAS90 7 months ago
@RUPERTDOUGLAS90 Enjoy your 100 years of world dominance, you southern state cunt, because I can't wait until China takes over in about 20 years.
TheLiberalKnight 6 months ago
@TheLiberalKnight Be careful of what you wish for, we could easily fix the situation with the right President and people in congress. BTW, has a kabab lately?
schaferhund11 5 months ago
@schaferhund11 Bullshit. You are bankrupt. And all of your money is owed to China. You are a sinking ship. And I'm happy that you are sinking, because you are always going on about how you are number one, always so fucking arrogant. I would want you to succeed, if you weren't so fucking arrogant and diplomatically rude.
TheLiberalKnight 5 months ago
@TheLiberalKnight We are going through hard times but we're not sinking. It's evil to wish harm to others and you will get it back ten fold. Plus, Europe is not doing to well either. Worry about your ownselves. The rudest, crudest and most arrogant people come from your country.
schaferhund11 5 months ago
@schaferhund11 You are sinking. You are already bankrupt. All super powers have their downfalls. The Spanish empire, the French empire, the British empire. Now it is your turn, and China is taking over.
Europe is doing better than the USA is. The bankruptcy of Greece does not mean the bankruptcy of Europe, idiot. And I'm afraid the Americans are the most arrogant people on the earth. The British are too modest, actually. The French are more arrogant than us, you fat cow.
TheLiberalKnight 5 months ago
@TheLiberalKnight No, your markets are down 2.7% and your economy is sinking as well. You have debt as well but maybe your media doesn't tell you. British people are not modest, polite or have any manners. You have just proved it by calling me a fat cow. I've seen Brits on t.v. and you have nothing to be so haughty about, I'm afraid.
schaferhund11 5 months ago
@schaferhund11 What the fuck, are you retarded or something? The British media is always reporting how badly the economy is doing 24/7, but actually we're doing a lot better than America is. For example, we've actually got a deficit reduction plan, that involved spending cuts rather than the failed keyesian methods of Obama. What you see on TV is not proof of anything, you stupid pratt. Read the figures. British obesity pales in comparision to the fat boys in the States!
TheLiberalKnight 5 months ago
@TheLiberalKnight I know the figures. Britain is the 2nd fattest country in Europe. And if you economy is so bad, why laugh at ours? Is is that it makes you feel better to demean others? That is another British trait that is really bad.
schaferhund11 5 months ago
@schaferhund11 2nd fattest in Europe... that isn't saying much by todays standards. Our real health problem is our teeth, which is a correct stereotype, just like the Americans are fat correct stereotype.
Our economy is doing badly, but not nearly as badly as yours, relative to the sizes. You came within 100 hours of bankruptcy, and you are still bankrupt because of private sector debt. We have not come close to that position yet. The English are arrogant to the Scots, nobody else.
TheLiberalKnight 5 months ago
LOL. You wanna know WHY America won it's freedom? Because France helped you. They had Cornwallis surrounded at Yorktown and were supplying America with training and weapons. Not only that, but Britain was fighting France on the continent as well as maintaining colonies in India.
America did not "dominate" anything more americans died than british. They were inferior to the British army and that was demonstrated when you tried to invade Canada in 1812. We burned your capital to the ground.
DaleWF10 7 months ago
@DaleWF10
the tide of the American revolution was turned by the Continental Army before the French arrived.
The fact that youre able to admit that you were defeated by a French army in the Americas is even funnier. Youd rather admit to loosing to them than Americans. I take pride in that.
USMarineRifleman0311 7 months ago
Comment removed
DaleWF10 7 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@USMarineRifleman0311 Damn right, a nation that covered 1/3 of the world and the largest and best navy in the world isn't gonna be defeated by one with no structured navy
The tide turned once france joined in until that time britain was kicking your arse all over the place
You also had the Dutch republic and Spain helping you too :)
DaleWF10 7 months ago
@USMarineRifleman0311 Simple fact is that America owes its independence to France. France bankrolled the revolution, bankrupted itself for American Independence, gave the Colonist the weapons and ammunition needed to fight a proper war, and tied up the Royal Navy around the world. Without that the Revolution would never have succeeded. So even though the French army didn't do much fighting in North America the French were still a major - if not the main - reason why the revolution succeeded.
11nytram11 5 months ago
@11nytram11
according to you, America won the Soviet Afghan war eventough the Afghans did most of the dying.
USMarineRifleman0311 5 months ago
@USMarineRifleman0311 Alright. So explain this me to me. If France hadn't paid for and provided the vast majority of the war material that the Colonists used to fight Britain how exactly could the Colonist's rebellion succeed? I dont doubt their desire to fight nor their ability once given the material to do but the capacity to aquire that material without French aid didn't exist. Without France the Colonist rebellion would have ended the same way as the Confederates rebellion, crushing failure.
11nytram11 5 months ago
@USMarineRifleman0311 It's like Britain in the Second World War. Britain wanted to fight on but lacked the means to provide itself with the material it needed to fight on so turned to American. Without American made material Britain could not have contintued to resist the Germans and would have had to negotiation a cease fire and capitulate. So American made material was a major reason why Britain could fight on in that war, not the only reason but a major reason.
11nytram11 5 months ago
@USMarineRifleman0311 According to you should I then completely disregard the contribution of the American's to WW2 prior to their entry to the conflict as a combatant as having no baring whatsoever on the war simply because they were only providing the means fight but weren't fighting themselves?
11nytram11 5 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
What a bunch of bullshit. This whole fucking senseless war could have been avoided if it weren't for Bush's incessant greed. WAKE UP, AMERICA. OIL SPEAKS. AND IT'S SAYING "DEMONS OF THE WORLD, START WARS OVER ME. HUMAN LIVES ARE EXPENDABLE AND MONEY IS HAPPINESS." God Damn America.
xDecemberFlower 7 months ago
Comment removed
tk291100 8 months ago
Comment removed
tk291100 8 months ago
The forefathers of the United States of America, who fought so hard to put it on the map, would be disgusted to hear about what their country has become today.
bjpw1234 8 months ago
@bjpw1234
The forefathers cared less about "putting the usa on the map" They cared about freedom, You are a scumbag for putting words in the Founding Fathers mouths, You should be spat on.
PenkemperK9 7 months ago
@PenkemperK9 Excuse me, you fucking peon? YOU'RE calling ME a scumbag? You're the scumbag for attacking me when I said nothing wrong to anybody. And, according to you're logic, you're the scumbag who is putting words into the forefathers' mouths, being so sure that they never cared about making a new country. Regardless of their motives, they fought to make a new country, a country where freedom could reign. So you're also wrong; you are a wrong, narcissistic, scumbag. YOU should be spat on.
bjpw1234 7 months ago
Traitors and criminals that was losing every battle till the French decided to poke there nose in
1stLordTheAdmiralty1 8 months ago
@1stLordTheAdmiralty1
Trenton, Princeton, Saratoga. The big three that turned the tide before the French ever considered fighting. Btw, the early US Navy never lost at sea, it even managed to raid English ports and capture a number of its HMS ships.
The French joined in for Yorktown and that was it. If you want to talk about a defeat, look up New Orleans 1815.
USMarineRifleman0311 7 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@USMarineRifleman0311 Don't try and twist history with your American bullshit propaganda because it only works with other yanks.The french funded the war for the Americans but the yanks was losing a lot more battles than they won till the french got involved and if we would of stopped that french fleet in the channel you would of remained a colony.The French troops on the ground out numbered you 4 to1.It was all their tactics, strategy on the battlefield by general Rochembeau .A French victory
1stLordTheAdmiralty1 7 months ago
@USMarineRifleman0311 In 1815 we kicked your ass and burnt down the whitehouse you cried for peace
1stLordTheAdmiralty1 7 months ago
@1stLordTheAdmiralty1
nobody cried for peace, nobody won the war, it was a global draw
the only asses being kicked in 1815 were british
USMarineRifleman0311 7 months ago
@USMarineRifleman0311 The 1812-15 war you come real close to becoming a colony .We fighting Napoleon at the time so our main force was fighting in Europe and we still kicked your asses and burnt down the white house.The Yanks tried taking Canada but got their asses handed to them and when we finished beating up the French in Europe all eyes was focused on America with our main force.This is when America wanted peace.You came close to being recolonised
1stLordTheAdmiralty1 7 months ago
@1stLordTheAdmiralty1
I stopped reading at "real close"
explain to me the british withdrawal of al basrah in 2007, is that what the world's best do in a tight spot?
this is fresh history not 300yr old firefights in colonized territories
USMarineRifleman0311 7 months ago
@USMarineRifleman0311 We did what we had to do our job was a success we won the hearts and minds.The British armed forces had been doing the same job for the last 30yrs in N.Ireland we knew what we was doing.The Yanks on the other hand were losing men left right and centre have no experience with places like that they were sitting ducks.The British Armed forces are small thats why we can train the to be top notch unlike the yanks which is that big it can't train it's troops properly there shit
1stLordTheAdmiralty1 7 months ago
@1stLordTheAdmiralty1
Im sorry once again but hearts and minds were not won in 2007. Most of the people were pissed about your presence and tactics (remember the protests? the molotovs? lol) No experience yanks up north were surging, no experience yanks took and held the Sunni triangle, no experience yanks never trained in ireland against protesters. Neither did the Iraqi Army and they took Basrah back. You dont train tougher, thats a myth, your PFT is on par with our Navy's, 1.5mile run only.
USMarineRifleman0311 7 months ago
@1stLordTheAdmiralty1
poor quality us soldiers you speak of, took Basrah in 2003 and every other city in that country. Even poorer quality were the IA and their 4 divisions held it till present day. We just couldnt find hi quality troops to hold that place for us.
USMarineRifleman0311 7 months ago
@USMarineRifleman0311 The British Military took Basra with ease.The British Military are superior trained but this is because it is small so they get round to given each high Quality training the American Military is big and either they are poorly trained or more likely it is that big they don't get round to training the all up to standard.You have finance,Man power and technology(All made by Europeans may i add) but in man to man combat the Yanks isn't all that good
1stLordTheAdmiralty1 7 months ago
@1stLordTheAdmiralty1
Please shut the fuck up. You dont have quality. British soldiers run 1.5 miles for their fitness test = same as our sailors. They dont train in 120deg heat of the Mojave desert prior to being deployed. Numbers is what wins battles, thats exactly the reason your countrymen gave way to the taliban offensive of 2007.
The US spearhead was led by 7th Armored, they took Basrah in 2003, no UK forces were on point. Yanks took Basrah and left it in the hands of the Brits...
USMarineRifleman0311 7 months ago
@USMarineRifleman0311 The British army is by far more superior trained and professional than the Yanks like most European armies are.Even in Our navy our Marines are by far more superior than the U.S marines but really we shouldn't compare because the Royal Marines are Commando's while the US marines are just infantry unless they are selected to Marine recon but The RM are already at that standard.Para's,Gurkha's,all the guards regiments are all elite infantry given superior training
1stLordTheAdmiralty1 7 months ago
@1stLordTheAdmiralty1
oh yea elite super duper paratrooper training saves you from bullets? dream on kid.
Your troops dont train in the Mojave desert under 125 deg heat. You dont run as far as we do. You dont shoot as far as we do. And we....dont give ground to insurgent offensives.
Last time the british were in Iraq they surrendered a whole division to the ottomans, they came back to give up basrah to the ancestors of the same ottomans they lost to in 1915.
USMarineRifleman0311 7 months ago
@1stLordTheAdmiralty1
you can train all you want, but you lost ships and a whole country our early military. Right now 300 million US citizens learn annually about your loss in the New World. Same with a billion Indians.
USMarineRifleman0311 7 months ago
@USMarineRifleman0311 We never lost the War of Independence to the Rebels we lost it to France plus Most people fighting on the American side we're British anyway it was more like a civil war
1stLordTheAdmiralty1 7 months ago
@1stLordTheAdmiralty1
civil war? lol
ever heard of the declaration of independence?
loyalist colonials were one thing
The British string of defeats started with Lexington and Concord....the tide turned during the Prussian surrender of Trenton. then went onto Princeton, Saratoga, Cowpens Monmouth...siege of Boston ending...it was all downhill before the French arrived.
USMarineRifleman0311 7 months ago
@USMarineRifleman0311 You're really have been brainwashed by American propaganda haven't you.Well history shows that you was losing more battles than you won and you would of remained a COLONY if it wasn't for France.If you was winning the war why did you seek help from France??? because you was losing the fight that's why.Even the Spanish also claim their part in the war of independence
1stLordTheAdmiralty1 7 months ago
@1stLordTheAdmiralty1
yea so do the iroquois indians and the japanese
USMarineRifleman0311 7 months ago
@USMarineRifleman0311 But Europe Canada and the Commonwealth are not so gullible than the brain washed Yanks and we have British,French and Spanish historians all in agreement
1stLordTheAdmiralty1 7 months ago
@1stLordTheAdmiralty1
gullible? the french fuckers arrived during the last years of the war, helping us trap the last of the british troops at yorktown. Most of the troops they landed in 1780 were inactive.
The only thing they did better than we couldve was they blocked off the escape route to the sea. Worst of all is Yorktown wasnt even a battle. 75%+ of the british force surrendered. Look up the term turning point + Saratoga, see what comes up
USMarineRifleman0311 7 months ago
@USMarineRifleman0311 LOL Stop twisting history with your American propaganda.The world knows without the French you would of remained a colony.Just be thankful we didn't stop that french fleet in the channel.Because if we did you'd never would never of gain independence they was even paying the American troops you became French mercenaries
1stLordTheAdmiralty1 7 months ago
@1stLordTheAdmiralty1
you? stop the french fleet?
you? lol thats funnier
your worst mistake was misunderestimating us.
I still think the most effective fleets ever assembled was the one at Dunkirk 1940. Its amazing how fast people will row with Stukas coming down on them.
USMarineRifleman0311 7 months ago
@1stLordTheAdmiralty1 who begged the americans when nazis kicked your ugly british asses????????WE KNOW IT BRITISH MONKEY
MrWeLikeYou 2 months ago
@MrWeLikeYou We won the battle of Britain Hitler abandoned operation sea lion.You helped liberate Europe
1stLordTheAdmiralty1 2 months ago
@1stLordTheAdmiralty1 british were begging americans after battle of britain for money to rebuild their shitty isle -cuz the nazis owned them so much, even though they didnt invade -they made you eat shit and you went to USA as ALWAYS hahahahhahahahahahaha UK=FULL OF ISLAND IDIOTS HAHAHAHAHHAHAHA sorry !!!!!!!
MrWeLikeYou 2 months ago
@MrWeLikeYou Vietnam. Korea. American colonial wars in which the pathetic American army was humiliatingly destroyed by local natives, and ones which Britain or France had won for 300 years. The American army is a joke. Full of crybabies and wimps.
TheLiberalKnight 1 week ago
@TheLiberalKnight Vietnam us won that war, we won the Tet offensive after that the Vietcong was wiped out unlike this war where we outright defeated you and just like in Korea which was a stalemate the North Vietnamese promised not to attack South Vietnam and unlike Korea we never attempted to invade the north our goal was to defend it and we did only later when we pulled out the NVA then invaded the south and was successful. so no We won Vietnam, learn your history idiot
VanOstrum 6 days ago
@VanOstrum No, you lost in Vietnam. You went in with the intention of unifying Korea under the South Korean republican regime. You left, a decade later, after thousands of US deaths, without achieving your goal. It doesn't matter how many battles you won- YOU LOST IN VIETNAM. Deal with it!
TheLiberalKnight 6 days ago
Comment removed
VanOstrum 6 days ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@TheLiberalKnight little history lesson. At first the VC like we in this war a great run with their hit and run tactics, but eventually the Americans and their allies had developed anti Guerrilla warfare teams which made it harder and harder fot the VC to fight in the jungle, So their plan was for the VC to fight in the open warfare, to attack 10 towns(They could not hold one town) and also to start a general up rising, non of these objectives did they accomplish
VanOstrum 6 days ago
@TheLiberalKnight No the North Vietnamese did not achieve any of their goals in the tet offensive and they failed military as well because they could not hold one town both military and starting a general uprising they failed at we successfully defended South Vietnam and the North promised that they would not attack the South only later after the US already pulled out of Vietnam did the North about 2 years later did the North invade without our help. In no way is this a US defeat.
VanOstrum 6 days ago
@VanOstrum What the fuck are you talking about here? Are you talking about Vietnam or Korea? A minute ago you were talking about Korea, in this comment you only talked about Vietnam.
TheLiberalKnight 6 days ago
Comment removed
VanOstrum 6 days ago
@TheLiberalKnight i don't know why you bring up the Korean war that was a stalemate which pitted massive firepower vs massive numbers like in the eastern war in ww2 "American colonial wars? I seem to remember Battle of the Monongahela which was mainly a British fuck up given the fact they were to stubborn to adapt to the natives tactics which by the way the British were cowering about while the Virginia militia at least knew how the Indians fought.
VanOstrum 6 days ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@TheLiberalKnight As for the revolution 80 percent of the forces fighting the British were Americans, the French came later with only 10000 french troops in north america US won many key battles before the French joined in the fighting, France played a huge role but mostly because of their proxy war, the British forces counting British, Germans, and loyalists outnumbered us about 2 to one you also had better equipment supplies tech, training etc despite this the British failed failed
VanOstrum 6 days ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@TheLiberalKnight saying the French won this war would be like saying the British Americans won the European war in ww2 because we supplied the USSR even tho 93 percent of the Germans died in the eastern front. now yes we would of lost with out french support but it was mainly a US victory.despite outnumbering Americans 2 to 1 and and having a powerful army the British lost to an army Full of "crybabies and wimps" if you are gonna bash Americans at least know what your talking about.
VanOstrum 6 days ago
@TheLiberalKnight And Korea was a stalemate its a surprise you do not know that, our main goal was to defend the South yes later it changed to uniting the Koreans but than the Chinese crossed the border and pushed us back the border, still they also had goals of uniting the Koreas and they failed, remember the war ended with the US and its allies pushing the Chinese and Koreans past the border, The war was a stalemate
VanOstrum 6 days ago
@VanOstrum That's not the point, America should have won in Korea. It was a stalemate, but there was no reason why America, who had become a new super power, couldn't have won against the Chinese. The Chinese outnumbered you, but your technology was far superior. Any other country could have won it if they had access to the sort of military technology that the Americans had.
TheLiberalKnight 6 days ago
@TheLiberalKnight " The Chinese outnumbered you, but your technology was far superior" again idiot history you lack, Remember the Eastern war? you also had firepower vs numbers and in that case numbers proved better, so yes I think numbers compensate also in the beginning of the war and also when China joined our soldiers our supply lines were overstretched and our troops were not even prepared for a war in the winter by the time the Chinese joined in.
VanOstrum 6 days ago
@TheLiberalKnight I know that i may seem to be saying the same thing over and over but that's only because you will not listen when we withdrew from Vietnam is was because we made the North promise not to attack the South again and they did than we left and then after we left and did not care so much to enforce it than the North Vietnamese invaded, so had nothing to do with us. you know nothing of history so do not bother debating either your dumb and can not read or just bias.
VanOstrum 6 days ago
@TheLiberalKnight I this you should get over the fact that you were defeated in this war, both politically and military unlike Vietnam which was just a political loss, after we won the Tet offensive we should have just invaded the North. we also never had the goal to unite Vietnam, so unlike Korea this was a victory, still I do have to say it was a political loss but that's about it
VanOstrum 6 days ago
@VanOstrum You're talking about the American revolution now?
No, I really don't care that the French and Spanish defeated us in the American revolution. Because your loss improved our economy. All of our money was coming from the Carribean; the American colonies were unproductive and hugely expensive.
You lost in Vietnam! You went there to remove communism in their political system! You FAILED! Get over it!
TheLiberalKnight 6 days ago
@TheLiberalKnight Do you know how to read? Vietnam was not a FAIL they LOST THE TET OFFENSIVE, THEY FAILED TO START A GENERAL UPRISING,THE VIETCONG WAS WIPED OUT, AND THEY FAILED TO HOLD ALL THE TOWNS THEY ATTACKED THAT = LOSS ON THEIR PART, ONLY LATER 2 YEARS AFTER WE LEFT, AND MADE THE NORTH VIETNAMESE PROMISE NOT TO ATTACK THE SOUTH AGAIN DID THEY INVADE IT WAS A SECOND CIVIL WAR NOT EVEN THE SAME WAR WE FOUGHT IN DID THE NORTH INVADE THE SOUTH, HAD NOTHING TO DO WITH US? HISTORY BOOK IDIOT.
VanOstrum 6 days ago
@TheLiberalKnight like I said before, most of the forces fighting the British were Americans not French, we won many key battles before they fought with us, you outnumbered us and had better tech, supplies, equipment. does not matter if the British did not care to us under their control fact is they failed.
VanOstrum 6 days ago
@TheLiberalKnight "You went there to remove communism in their political system!" no idiot we wanted to contain communism and only defend the South, nor did we ever invade the North, in defending Vietnam we did achieved that goal we won the tet offensive, and the North Vietnamese promised not to attack the south again, and then we left, than 2 years later with out US support then the South lost. so no Vietnamese becoming unified had nothing to do with us.
VanOstrum 5 days ago
@VanOstrum Oh really? The Americans were merely defending themselves in the cold war? Your naiivity is hilarious. What do you think marshall aid was for? It was to rebuild capitalist economies in Europe before people became attracted to communism. Do you even know what the cold war was about? America was fighting for capitalism, and that meant going into Vietnam. You lost in Vietnam! Just accept it!
TheLiberalKnight 5 days ago
@TheLiberalKnight Look you do not seem to get the point, yes the US wanted South Vietnam under their their realm of influence, but not the North, the US never declared war on the North, nor did it have any plans to invade the North ever heard of the policy of containment? we wanted to contain communism,We gave up fighting for capitalism after we won the tet offensive and North Vietnam promised not to attack the South again, than we withdrew, when North Vietnam won, we were gone for 2 years
VanOstrum 5 days ago
@VanOstrum This is the biggest piss-take ever. Look, Britain was owned in Signapore. France was owned in Canada. America was owned in Vietnam! Just deal wih it!
You're making up the most hilarious lies in order to justify the Americans pulling out after 10 years without achieving a single military objective!
TheLiberalKnight 5 days ago
@TheLiberalKnight Uhh do you realize what this video is? Its about the American Revolution, not about the wars you are bitching about. Go on a tribute to the men who died in Nam and go bitch there.
PhilliesPhanDM5 5 days ago
@TheLiberalKnight We lost because of radical hippies and Nixions corruption not because of the milltary but phillies right is has nothing to do with the video.
Mikelovesham90 4 days ago
@Mikelovesham90 How the hell did radical hippies and Nixions force defeat on the Americans? I didn't see them blocking the use of Napalm in Vietnam! Lol.
TheLiberalKnight 4 days ago
@1stLordTheAdmiralty1 Funny how this USMArineKid0311 believe that first "americans" could resist to the full might of the British Empire..........
If the redcoats concentrate all their forces at the American continent ........ it would be fast defeat for so called americans.
ViciousCritique 7 months ago
@ViciousCritique
New Orleans 1815, US forces were outnumbered 5 to 1, look up the casualties.
We'll sell you each hill at the price of Bunker Hill, we're ok with that. You can have our entire continent at that price.
USMarineRifleman0311 7 months ago
@USMarineRifleman0311 The only asses being kicked in 1812 were the Americans.
lolatmyaccounts 7 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
dont argue about something that happen 200 years ago :D
xxKOZTRAxx 8 months ago
Comment removed
sonnenlicht87 8 months ago
fuck the USA
manbearpig309 8 months ago
Thanks for the weapons and all but it was out of pure self interest obviously and we have paid for them now so shut up about it! Haha. I don't get the competition, there isn't one. Britain was the world super power but that was a long, long, long time ago. Now i'm happy the US is as it is our powerful ally. You know a lot of Europe and Asia is still a bit annoyed with us for the whole trying to take over the world thing. Seriously though, arguing over the revolutionary wars is so so silly.
VeritasEngine 9 months ago
Yes, US helped us immeasurably with weapons but it was QUITE CLEARLY in self interest, not because we're chums- you really didn't want Germany sweeping over everything. Some Americans talk about WWII like it was a big favour you did the world, it's ridiculous. Still, I don't get all these arguments about our two countries, I don't see how it relates now. We were the worlds primary super power, that has looooong gone. The US are now the super power, that is now fading too but I don't want it to
VeritasEngine 9 months ago
Though I have to say SOME Americans have an insufferably arrogant, ignorant and narrow minded view of WWII. I mean literally talking about it like some sill Hollywood film where the cavalry comes in right at the end, oh how fucking glorious. It is pretty harsh on the millions upon millions of people who died fighting the Nazis! Most of Europe fell and Britain stood alone, if we had been taken then the US would've had a right old fight on its hands and with no allies.
VeritasEngine 9 months ago
Idiots think of this as a war between the United States and The United Kingdom but it's a bit of a silly view. The colonies were mostly Brits, they quite rightly grew tired of King George and his tyrannical regime, unreasonable nature and lack of concessions. Generally the colonies had an affinity with their distant motherland but were pushed into this war- from which the United States was then born. Stop it with this stupid US vs UK mentality please! Even with WW2!? We were allies yeah?
VeritasEngine 9 months ago
Bizzare arguments between horrendously misinformed people- YEAH we kicked your asses in revolutionary war, yeah well were kicking your asses in 1812, yeah well saved the world in WWII.... JESUS, gimme a break will ya? Losing the 13 colonies wasn't that much of a hindrance, the UK wasn't making much money from it. There were far more benefits to be had from trading with the new nation, this then allowed Britain to concentrate of Europe, Africa and Asia. So what is with these arguments?
VeritasEngine 9 months ago
God, discussions on pages such as this are so silly! Americans seem to think Brits still care about these wars and the declaration of independence! Rather daft, it isn't even taught as standard in our schools, in history or any other lesson. It is a far, far, far more significant event for Americans obviously, bloody hell I bet if you asked a lot of Brits on the street, especially younger ones, they wouldn't even know America was born from British colonies. They should of course !
VeritasEngine 9 months ago
@tinchystryderfan101 Yeah, and the USA actually used it...
RoyalRyno4 9 months ago
no the reason great britian lost is because the americans were being badasses and attacking in the forests and while they were asleep. so fuck you great britain stop crying about something that happend 250 years ago
KaIanari 9 months ago
Thank you the video man.
UnHolyFurBall 9 months ago
the americans are all imigrants from England,Africa and loads more the real americans are the natives
thegodfather204 9 months ago
EVERYONE SEEMS TO BE FORGETING WE RULED AMERICA FOR 174 YEARS.
IT TOOK YOU GUYS OVER 100 YEARS TO DEFEAT US,with help from the frogs
savethebrits91 9 months ago
It's amazing that the American's started the war with some big disadvantages like no navy, while Britain had the best navy in the world at the time, but America still ended up victorious.
rudewolf89 9 months ago
@rudewolf89 if you knew anything the only reason the british lost was because of the french helping out the resistence, they came in from behind, the americans would of never taken us down, youd been fighting for independence for 200years and then ytou finally got it when the french came in behind us.
00rouchy00 9 months ago
@SandNBones If you haven't noticed, it WAS a revolution because your British ancestors never learned how to respect their colonies and The United States of America became a independent country and nation, striving to be the absolute opposite of our old English government system run by a king or queen. And not even half of America today is English. Plus.. France got to America in the last 2 months of the war.. we were obviously winning then..
RoyalRyno4 9 months ago
@RoyalRyno4 France aided the Americans as early as '76 via goods and arms thru the Dutch West Indies - by '78 the a treaty was signed after the defeat of the British at Saratoga - more money etc came our way -
nsdtr01 9 months ago
Blame your loss on France or Spain, a victory is a victory, look at us now, we are more powerfuk than you and there isnt shit your country can do about it. Stop talking about what would have happend and just live with you horrible military skills. Even if we would have lost, your country would not keep this land for long, your army is weak and that will never change, you will forever be picked on by smaller countries, its the nature or being umskilled and weak.
flamingaxe791 9 months ago
@flamingaxe791 All i can say is you are a retard that thinks the USA has always been a great country and denies to believe the country's real history. I am British and i do not hate the USA.
RossKerr255 8 months ago
Dont blame your loss on the French navy, while fighting on American soil, for every 1 American that you killed we killed 35 Brittish soldiers, it was a pretty pathetic loss. Not to mention the we are the worlds super power now and Brittian is only number 8. Just be glad we sided with you in WW1 because if we were enemies the nuclear bomb would have landed on British soil and you would belong to France.
flamingaxe791 9 months ago
The Brittish should be ashamed to have lost the way they did, you see the difference between our to countries is America takes war seriously, we fight for prosparity and freedom, you fight because you are paid to do so. We also dont see value in using tax payer money to pay for a "royal families" personal wedding. See bull shit like that is the reason why we kick your countries ass to become the most powerful and technically advanced country that this world has ever seen.
flamingaxe791 9 months ago
@flamingaxe791 I wanted to sit here and pick apart your arguments one by one by when I saw you claim that "for every 1 American that you killed we killed 35 Brittish soldiers" I realised it would be pointless.
11nytram11 9 months ago
@SandNBones You guys are the biggest dumbas on Earth. America was winning the war 3 years after Lexinton and Concord. The French never fought on American soil. NEVER. They provided blockades and naval bombardments of English forts. I don't know who you think you Brits are.. just because you controlled 1/4 of the world at one point, doesn't mean you are or were top shit, you lost all of you colonies anyways dipshit.
RoyalRyno4 9 months ago
No matter who kicked who asses in whichever war way back when, it remains an undeniable fact that the modern day US Britain Alliance/Friendship is arguably the strongest alliance in existence. I personally bear no resentment whatsoever toward modern day Brits for actions that occurred hundreds of years ago.
That being said, asking for mutual understanding on a Youtube video is like asking for a small miracle. But whatever. You're awesome Britan/England/UK.
Respectfully,
An American
DannyCro10 9 months ago 20
@DannyCro10 Hear, hear
hotboyclarence 6 months ago
@DannyCro10 The only reason that that alliance is powerful is because the US supplies all the force. We could be without the UK and France and would hardly feel any difference in our military might, they need us to protect them, we dont need them for shit...
stupidfleshmonkies 5 months ago
@stupidfleshmonkies the UK royal navy is the most highly trained and skilled mitary force in the world you dumb fuck and it is the US that keeps asking our country to help them at war eg. Gulf war, Afganistan, Iraq and Vietnam
The only war we rejected to help you in was Vietnam and you lost
DaleWF10 5 months ago
@DaleWF10 Lol go on, keep deluding yourself into thinking that...Maybe 300 years ago the Royal Navy was all powerful, but in todays day and age, the US Navy Dominates the seas, and the US air force dominate the sky. We don't keep asking you to help, you tag along so you can reap what we sow you freaking leeches. Last, the "loss" in Vietnam was because there was not support at home, it was a political loss, militarily we won. Its the exact same in Afghanistan.
stupidfleshmonkies 5 months ago
@stupidfleshmonkies Whatever retard, your marines come over to the UK gain more skiils on a regular basis and your army was in Vietnam 20 years and ended up loosing even though Vietnam was a third world country
In 1982 the UK won the falklands war on our own within 2 months right on the doorstep of the bigger nation Argentina
Asif you actually think the UK helps you in war on there own wishes by tagging along you must be on a whole different level of stupid
DaleWF10 5 months ago
@DaleWF10
US Marines in UK for training? when? why would we ship our own to get 2nd rate EU training since we have more combat experience and a different infantry doctrine.
Please dont compare a little police action like the fuckin Falklands to an actual land war in Asia lol
Tagging with EU forces in Afghan and Iraq has brought nothing to us than the loss of Basrah and a stalemate in Helmand. We have recieved jack and shit in the cooperation, instead, we took over both AOs
USMarineRifleman0311 5 months ago
@USMarineRifleman0311 Is there really a need for you to demean forces of a foreign country to praise your own? The US is a powerful nation & an effective military force on it own but you all seem to have this inferiority complex where you cant for one moment admit that any other nation at any point in history might have been even half as effective in battle as any American unit. You people wonder why even your own Allies dont like you when your insulting their people and spitting on their help.
11nytram11 5 months ago
@USMarineRifleman0311 How would like it if someone came here and start slagging of the American miltiary? Saying that no matter what help you provided them, no matter what the situations were in the conflict, no matter how many you troops died in a war that really had nothing to do with you but you joined to help and Allie that you contribution was worthless, you troops was useless did nothing to help out in anyway. You'd be deeply insulted wouldn't you? So grow up and be a little respectful.
11nytram11 5 months ago
@DaleWF10
UK navy? it still exists?
last I heard they were selling us the last of their harriers lmao
US only asks for diplomatic support nothing more. 600 troops that you sent to loose the battle of Basrah isnt considered winning anything.
USMarineRifleman0311 5 months ago
@USMarineRifleman0311 It's spelt Basra.. And 10,000 British royal navy took part in Iraq and Britain won the 2003 battle of Basra you idiot!
Killed in action in Iraq stands at 4,792 U.S 179 UK... That says alot your marines suck!!!
DaleWF10 5 months ago
@DaleWF10
good god...
where do I start?
Basrah fell under the pressure of the US spearhead, our forces were going northwards anyways. We left the British down there so they could get the occupying sooner. Which they did terribly to begin with. The militia in Basrah was paid off so the UK forces could get a safe passage to the airport alone. If you havent noticed, Iraq was a US war, we handled 95% of the fighting and occupying, we didnt evacuate hot zones, we stuck around and won..I was there
USMarineRifleman0311 5 months ago
@DaleWF10
the US Marine Corps itself (my service) lost less troops in Iraq than the 11th Royal Marine battalion lost during three raids, Zeebrugge 1918, Tobruk 42 and Dieppe the next year.
Needless to say Dieppe was their last stop. The ones that werent killed were captured wounded on the beach, not by the SS but by foreign conscript Wehrmacht troops.
USMarineRifleman0311 5 months ago
@DannyCro10 Britain is the geographical name of island which contains the countries of England, Scotland and Wales the United Kingdom is a union of the countries England, Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland
DaleWF10 5 months ago
@SandNBones dude, like i keep saying, if the english were kicking our asses so badly there would have been a surrender so please stop being bitter about the fact that u lost (twice) and france saving us? the french couldnt save themselves in WW1 or WW2 and the russians would not have won, they lost 26 million soldiers while America and England lost roughly 500,000 give or take, trust me they wouldnt have won.
12qwas456 9 months ago
What rly still gets me is why the UK just simply 'gave' Australia away It's easy to say they had learned their lesson from the US Rev War, but (I don't have any data to support this claim) the UK would have crushed any Australian reistance like a bug. Did they realise how much shit we have in the ground here? The British were too kind! I would've got hardcore! Conquering territory,expanding the empire.. that s*** gets me hard! and just give it all back? SCREW THAT!? lol
hawker39 10 months ago
England is such a weak country, If France with a low level army can defeat england than the United States could wipe the floor with them.
PenkemperK9 10 months ago
I am an old man who was raised with several brothers, me being the oldest. We used to fight each other, but woe unto the guy who picked on one of my brothers. I really think countries are a lot like that. The US, England, Wales, Scotland, Ireland, Canada, Australia and New Zealand have always seemed like brothers or at least cousins to me. I just hope we get along better in reality than what shows on these sites. We really need each other. You guys who want to pick fights think about that.
farmmur 10 months ago
@SandNBones if the english were kicking our ass so bad then y wasnt there a surrender?..the french didnt really come into the equation untill 1781, 6 years after lexington! if the english military was so big and bad they would have crushed the rebelion, and in WW1 and WW2 we saved the french and basically europe we never treated them like shit.so if your gunna search american history vids i would appreciate it if you got your facts straight before you started talking shit u arrogant limy prick.
12qwas456 10 months ago
@12qwas456
sorry, AMERICA saved France? WHEN DID THAT HAPPEN!?
America declared war on Japan, never attacked one german soldier (75% of entire army fighting USSR), and then, when Japan surrendered due to their entire army (NOT navy) crushed in China. Then, they had the nerve to atomic bomb a SURRENDERED nation.
That is downright despicable. Nothing in history compares to what America did.
WolfytheWolf5667 10 months ago
@WolfytheWolf5667 are you some type of dumba** America declared war on japan and then Germany declared war on America to say America never fought against Germany is like saying America didn't beat the Russians in the 1980s Olympics hockey. U ever heard of D day. as for us bombing japan after they surrendered you clearly don't know history the atomic bomb was the thing that made japan surrender . i like how you say Americans don't know about history but you just got the entire war wrong
Poey85 8 months ago
@Poey85
Actually after the bombing of Pearl Harbour, the Japanese sent the declaration of war.
Japan surrendered in China when their ARMY was destroyed by Chinese.
D-Day? so what? WE HAD THAT PLANNED OUT. America's trying to take the credit.
GRANTED, you did well in the pacific providing manpower to fight those disgusting Imperials, but the entire war was mainly won by Yugoslavia which slowed down Hitler with a million men, they died, but the USSR killed Germany afterwards.
WolfytheWolf5667 8 months ago
@WolfytheWolf5667
you planned D-day? lmao
the british plans for anything amphibious since Gallipoli to Dieppe convinced the world that an invasion of a hostile beachhead would never again be possible. You couldnt take a beachhead from Turks for fucks sake.
To make things worse, after the Arnhem fiasco, your contribution the western front were 3x smaller than that of the mobilized US forces.
USMarineRifleman0311 7 months ago
@SandNBones They didnt beat the brits, they helped. It was a joint effort.
12qwas456 10 months ago
To all the people who say the US didnt do anything(mainly birts) please get your facts right. Yes, France and Spain helped but thats because they hated England, and they didnt enter the war untill the end. And dont forget the war of 1812 there was no intervention from any other nation that was pure US vs. England and the US won. People say were arrogant but truth is you are, u search american revoloutionary vids. and then starty talking shit cuz ur sore losers. We won u lost get on with it.
12qwas456 10 months ago
@12qwas456 The War of 1812 was not won by the US, if anything it was a draw. The British didn't want war after almost 50 uninterupted year of conflict with France, the Canadians only wanted to protect their homes from a hostile invader, Tecumseh wanted an independent confederation of Indian tribes and America wanted some respect - only Tecumseh failed to get what he wanted so the clear outcome was that the Indians lost...big time.
11nytram11 9 months ago
@11nytram11 ok if it wasnt won by the us how come england didnt invade america?....
12qwas456 9 months ago
@12qwas456 Britain did invade America in the War of 1812. Britain invaded Michigan and took control of Detroit for a year, invaded Maryland and burnt Washington DC, invaded New York several times and burnt Buffalo, invaded Alabama and captured Mobile, even the Battle of New Orleans was fought to oppose a British invasion of Louisiana.
11nytram11 9 months ago