Added: 3 years ago
From: extremearts1
Views: 9,907
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (40)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • Take my money!

  • did the oil company buy you out? When will this be for sale to the public?

    thanks.

  • This guy is hilarious... he gets 20l/100km from his E85, but then he substracts the 85% of ethanol from the equation and argues that he gets 3l/100km in gasoline.

    When this difference between "fuel consumption" and "gasoline consumption" is pointed out to him he cries foul... And while what he is saying is strictly speaking true, covering up 85% of the fuel consumption by arguing that it's not gasoline is pure BS.

  • @kkyt543 So it does not get 110 MPG. What he is saying is the 15% of gasoline he has mixed in is what he gets the 110 MPG out of. That's stupid.

  • quite different technology and no mention of where or how these guys have been educated or glimpse of the power source.

    No wonder their stock is worthless!!!!!!!!!

  • Doug, you are such a lying sack of shit. Send me the $100 you and your wife stole from me. I cannot wait to tell Mark S. What a fucking thief you are. You have no idea how many people I know that can bring you down. Send me the money you stole from me. I cannot believe how many people you have conned. You know who I am, so get a hold of me soon and send me the money you stole. Do it quickly. I hate lying fuckers like you. I want my money you stole from me.

  • Type on Google: e85 fuel scam You will get everything you need to know on the subject, first link on top of google.

  • @luc59457 more misinformation for the masses. i can only surmise why the focus of independent energy production has centered on corn production, but the actual truth is that ethanol can be produced from any kind of bio-mass substance, even yard waste. let's ignore that fact however, and focus on the energy requirements to create the finished product; do you really have yourself convinced that production of ethanol can even begin to rival the energy requirements of gasoline production?

  • have you really thought about everything it takes to produce gasoline? let's ignore THAT aspect of the argument and focus on the most pivotal aspect of this debate; when you do the research, you will find that the greatest opponents to domestic ethanol production are all employed by or surreptitiously funded by big oil corporations. do you remember when cigarettes posed no significant health risk to panels of scientists tesifying to congressional grand juries? ethanol don't work? tell brazilians

  • @lezzunz4fR33 LOL, no, and my earlier comment explains this. Our current ethanol production represents only 3.5 percent of our gasoline consumption — yet it consumes twenty percent of the entire U.S. corn crop,

  • @luc59457 *sigh* i have to blame myself this time. i didn't take the time to make myself ABUNDANTLY clear. alchohol can be made from anything of cellulose structure; if a tree falls down in the city, the cleanup crew grinds it into pulp and guess what you have? instant mash. scrape the uneaten brocoli off your plate, know what you have? instant mash. cut the grass on your lawn and bag the mess, know what you have? instant mash. japanese scientists have figured out a way to refine alchohol from

  • @luc59457 old office paper for the love of god! office paper! the reality is that ethanol could be made from raw waste products that currently have no greater purpose in life than choking landfills. ethanol production could literally make bagging yard waste after you cut the grass profitable for the average homeowner. the fermentation process requires only enzymes and time and the resultant product only requires 180 degrees of sustained heat to boil off the mash(easily achieved using

  • @lezzunz4fR33 Electricity from Methane from landfills requires no enzymes, and time is not an issue when the landfill has already had years to grow. Same with agriculture. It burns much cleaner than gasoline. Unfortunately, This is more common in the small U.K than Canada and U.S.A.

  • @luc59457 sunlight concentrated by angled mirrors or exhaust heat from other manufacturing processes. the cost in raw materials and energy required are negligible at best(especially considering the difficulty of first pumping crude, refining it and all of the shipping/distribution methods necessary). why don't you hear about this? oil companies are so heavily invested in the status quo that anything so simple and economically viable are a very real threat to their continued monopolistic control

  • @lezzunz4fR33 I know, very true.. There is some information that I put on my channel frontpage, which was on the news months ago, which claimed B.P invested 15 million dollars against cleaner energy resources. How can they get any more obvious?!

  • @luc59457 of the energy markets. the average man can't produce gasoline and will never be able to; but he CAN throw some yard waste into a still and cook up some fuel. how would the gas company ever profit from that? they can't. that's why it's illegal. don't let the robber barrons tell you what to think; they don't care about your well-being. they WANT you to tow their line, like a dutiful slave. free thinking humans could fix so many of the problems that exist in this world, be part of that.

  • @lezzunz4fR33 We can only do so much, money is in the way, and the ones who have profited most by these old outdated technologies. Like most technologies, they become outdated and upgraded to hopefully something better. Energy is no exception.

  • @lezzunz4fR33 I am part of it.. Check my channel, I promote and assist with electric bikes. I would like to see more on your behalf.

  • Sorry, e85 is not a practical fuel for the future, but perhaps CNG will be a bit more promising.

  • well i read today on a different website that this dude, got disqualified for the x competition, and lied that he left to help out our economy in need. lol, well truth was that the team didnt finish filling out the required information to enter the competition ( i can only wonder why ;) ) probably cuz its a hoax. this dude got laid off by ford, on the first round. u think ford would fire a genius that would make them a super gas engine that would make there suv market superior to all??? cmon.

  • ford is always involved, i'll have some videos posted in a few days that shows ford getting in and out in another venture

  • E85 is an alcohol fuel mixture that typically contains a mixture of up to 85% denatured fuel ethanol and gasoline or other hydrocarbon (HC) by volume. On an undenatured basis, the ethanol component ranges from 70% to 83%. E85 as a fuel is widely used in Sweden and is becoming increasingly common in the United States, mainly in the Midwest where corn is a major crop and is the primary source material for ethanol fuel production;

  • ALthough I like this idea, I would much Prefer to see CNG in vehicles or electric... Though you are still creating CO2, less amount than pure gas, I would rather see reducing another greenhouse gas in order to produce CO2, rather than simply the production of CO2.. Such as the reduction in methane.. Some CNG cars already exist and get some good MPG... I have one in my favorites from Germany. More....

  • Our current ethanol production represents only 3.5 percent of our gasoline consumption — yet it consumes twenty percent of the entire U.S. corn crop, causing the price of corn to double in the last two years and raising the threat of hunger in the Third World. And the increasing acreage devoted to corn for ethanol means less land for other staple crops, giving farmers in South America an incentive to carve fields out of tropical forests that help to cool the planet and stave off global warming

  • Most vehicles can't run on pure ethanol, but E85, a mix of eighty-five percent ethanol and fifteen percent gasoline, requires only slight engine modifications.

    But as a gasoline substitute, ethanol has big problems: Its energy density is one-third less than gasoline, which means you have to burn more of it to get the same amount of power. It also has a nasty tendency to absorb water, so it can't be transported in existing pipelines and must be distributed by truck or rail,

  • which is tremendously inefficient.

  • i think their not counting the 85% ethonol as fuel in the mpg estimates hence the 110 mpg

  • It says MPGe. E means equivilent?

  • Removed comment from 2012listo because of profanity

  • Comment removed

  • Well this guy was in my county paper on the front page because he lives in napoleon ohio and is about only 20miles from my house so he must have something going for him

  • Either this guy will be a household name next year or you'll never hear of him again... With oil being a multi-trillion dollar per year industry, I wouldn't be surprised if this is the last we ever hear of this guy.

  • @P8121 Boom!

  • This remids me so much of back in the 70's when people started comming up with gas saving inventions that unfortunately got crushed by big oil.

    Dough just be carefull if someone offers you money to sell your technology since probaly it will get boxed. The US needs this now more than ever.

    Best of Luck Dough

  • Sounds like 16.5 mpg on gas. Pretty lame.

  • equivalent mpg?

     sounds like small print to me.

  • Great if it's true.. but I doubt it is. If these guys could come up with it, why hasn't any car company before them? I'd love for it to be real, I'd be the first in line to have this engine setup swapped into my Mustang, but I'm afraid it's a load of BS.

  • It's call greed, companies kept solution shut and keep miles low so oil company can make more money.

  • i like this it sounds like the way to go

Loading...
Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more