This looks interesting but I couldn't sit through it - let alone truly listen with the distracting background music. A shame. Hoping there is another version somewhere.
High Frequency Active Auroral Research Program (HAARP) has links between HAARP and the work of Nikola Tesla (particularly potential combinations of HAARP energy with Tesla's work on pneumatic small-scale earthquake generation).
A directed-energy weapon (DEW) emits energy in an aimed direction without the means of a projectile. It transfers energy to a target for a desired effect. Intended effects may be non-lethal or lethal. Some such weapons are real, or are under active research and development.
So where are all the youtube haters telling the poster of this video to go hang themself? Where are all the people who believe the planes took down the towers and why aren't they bombarding this video with their ignorance like in every other conspiracy video on youtube?
This must be one dangerous piece of information, why, you wouldn't want people to observe&listen and make up their very own minds about something now would you Won't tube?
Something appears to be terribly wrong here in the good ol' U.S.S.A. I've been trying and trying to e-mail this vid~No Chance. It's called censorship, Russia, China, now it's here in Amerika. It's pathetic to think that the system is so threatened by the simple act of sharing information in order for people to make up their own minds. This tyranical bullshit has never worked before......And it's NOT going to work this time either, so put THAT in your pipe and smoke it "Youtube" Father Fuckers!!!
@LOPRESTI68 There were so many camera's looking up at towers after the first tower was "struck" so I'd argue its irrefutable that a plane hit the SECOND tower. The clear evidence is how WTC1,2, and 7 fell. And how complete, symmetrical, they fell. As well as how much concrete was turned to dust. Just doesn't happen in any natural collapse
@godbluffvdgg Nice post.. But honestly, I get tired of of people expecting "experts" to tell them what they can readily see. It demoralizes regular civilians to being less than human. And people in NYC died like cattle b/c of those demolitions.
This is an extremely clever and rational woman. I like the fact that she doesn't seem completely comfortable speaking to a large audience. Means to me that she genuinely feels she has to be on there and not because she's a fast talker who just wants to be heard
Open for new ideals -to make this world we live in a better place.The time has come that we all pitch in an Help!! Not just stand back an look. Thank you - have a bless day.
I DO NOT BELIEVE PLANES HIT THE BUILDING I BELIEVE THEY USED HALLAGRAMS IF YOU LOOK AT PROJECT BLUE BEAM YOU START TO UNDERSTAND SOME OF THE GREAT TECHNOLOGY THEY HAVE.
Just because this woman has B.S. (Civil Engineering, 1981) (Structural Engineering), M.S. (Engineering Mechanics (Applied Physics), 1983), and Ph.D. (Materials Engineering Science, 1992). That doesn't qualify her to determine the reasons the towers collapsed on that day...OH WAIT... IT DOES.
@studmalexy My friend I was a member of ae911 when they only had 100 architects. So, I am well aware of those gentlemen. I have a bit of education myself. An architect i.e. Richard and Jones is a Mormon, dubious at best, isn't the same as a materials analysis engineer. If you look at her evidence, as I did, with an open mind, she makes very valid points that touch your truth chords. But, I wish you well and regardless of your position; 911 is still an inside job. peace
@spystyle Consider that, as Dr. Wood suggests, an explosion does not mean evidence of a "bomb," unless you consider an egg exploding in a microwave the equivalent of a bomb exploding.
Dr Judy Wood is a hero and a very blessed person. The entire country if not the world should congratulate her and demand a proper investigation. God knows there are so many people who have been offed, we all need to protect her and ensure she is safe. I am sending money for body guards and I hope others will do this too. We must stop the NWO and the pigs who are destroying our country. Why is there always a problem? Rumsfeld is the clue in this case.
I've sold over 1000 of dr wood's dvds on ebay...to all over the world...surely we must be approaching tipping point and its only a question when the mainstream media will succumb to this truth pressure...i'd like to see all the so called physics university professors be held to account for ignoring the 911 truth
23:19 "i can't tell exactly what" dr wood makes no claims, only suppresses the claims made by others and inspires free thinking in the country whose FIRST AMENDMENT is free speech.... Her point of view has cost her more in a decade then most of us will ever earn or even LEARN in a lifetime.
Fireworks display by Cai Guo-Qiang at the Arab Museum of Modern Art in Dohari demonstrates the lightning speed that detonation charges can be set off using computers. Notice how sound can appear to be one continuous roar. Much in the same way that the 3 WTC buildings were brought down by controlled demolition in Set 11, 2001 at near free fall speeds. Easy when you have the technology.
Dr Wood was fired for questioning the govt story. For pointing to evidence and asking - what accounts for these findings? What made these police cars on the bridge incinerate - located miles away from the towers. What left cars flipped over that day? And what would cause remaining rubble to produce heat weeks after the towers fell, that workers had to replace their boots every few hours.
@xvepicvx What about many cars being towed to further points of the city to clear the room for emergency veh's? Then after pics were taken of those cars as though they had melted there?
@masonfreeparty Is that all you have to say ? No counter points or anything ? Just straight to banging your head on the wall and crying names ? Use reason and logic my good man . Character assination only comforts you temporarily
If you listen to how she explains it through the same effects we see in tornado/hurricanes, then it would be simple science. Perhaps you should research Walter Russell before you go off.
@WAHsu It`s a pity is`nt it!.All of us should be on the same page,wanting to find out what happened,if someone of obvious intellegence says that they think a particular way was used then that possibility should be examined,not just blown off.
In 1945 a new weapon was unleashed on the world,very few people new of its existence, who is to say a newer weapon was not used on this day.All evidence needs to be looked at.Dr Wood`s book is BRILLIANTLY simplistic to read and understand.
Judy Wood is a dingbat for obsessing over all of the actual evidence - and then submitting it as a legal case against the NIST contractors.
Why can't she stick to doggedly defending a particular theory carefully weaved together from both evidence and assumption and then relentlessly preach it to the poor worn out 9/11 truth movement until it becomes a mantra, while making sure to stay well clear of the courts.
@theawecabinet I would have thought you need to look at all the "actual evidence" to get to the truth.
You`re second sentence sounds like you`re talking about some other people out there in the truth movement who will NOT look at all the evidence.
Dr Judy Wood is certainly no dingbat,she would not have held her teaching position for as long as she did if she was,and she would probably still be doing that if not for BRAVELY speaking out.
@theawecabinet Yeah YOU wrote it "actual evidence" in your previous comment,calling yourself names now hey!.I am merely saying look at ALL of it not just the parts YOU want to see.
Question,Did you even watch and listen to all of this video?.
OMG what if the majority of the resistance to the truth (and supporters of the official story) are actually people like me who are just being sarcastic?!
@theawecabinet your comment shows a large inability to articulate. I hope you can improve your argument. Evidence and Assumption? When evidence is examined properly it speaks for itself and no assumptions are necessary. Plenty of folks continue buying into the shoveled crap that is being labeled 'sugar' while Wood does not assert any theory. 'Obsessing over actual evidence' is as inherent to truth as visible light is to any seer. Further Judy IS in the courts last i checked, dingbat
My sarcasm was my way of exposing the unfounded and hypocritical ridicule and derision usually levelled at the people in society who are the most level headed and rational (in this case, Dr Wood).
But using sarcasm in youtube comments never works because everyone always takes you literally! ;)
Quick question. Is it really cointelpro when people argue about HOW the government took down the towers....I mean these people are not questioning the government's involvement. So whether you believe it was taken down by nanothermite, TNT, or leprachauns that chopped down the support beams, if you agree that the government did it, WE NEED A PROSECUTION, and then we can figure out EXACTLY HOW THEY DID IT. THIS BICKERING IS COINTELPRO. WHO CARES IF OJ USED A KNIFE OR SCISSORS? FIND OUT LATER.
@exxx247 > WHO CARES IF OJ USED A KNIFE OR SCISSORS?
Ummm.... but to bring a case, you need evidence to determine which of those it is. Typing in capitals does not make a case. And until you study the evidence, as Dr Judy Wood has, in relation to 9/11, you really will not know what you're dealing with. I didn't - until about 2007-by which time I HAD studied the evidence (and now I have had to write a book about it-in part due to comments like yours by people who THINK they know what happened)
I didn't mean it from that perspective. I was addressing the fact that people were accusing both sides of being cointelpro. As far as I know, and I think most others would agree, the main 'conspiracy theories' which are really a mishmash of possibilities for the most part, have either more or the same amount of validity with the limited available evidence as does Wood. And I used caps because I was pissed. So to accuse either side of COINTELPRO is counter-productive at least
@exxx247 by the way personally i think her theory is a bit 'out there' because this could have all been done using far more conventional means than she proposes, furthermore there is quite a bit of evidence supporting the usage of said means. although i have not read her book.
@exxx247 What conventional means though?.Please buy the book and read it,Dr Wood as you have heard from this recording is not specifically laying blame on anyone,all she says is look at the evidence that was around on that day and make up your own mind.For me,a controlled demolition does not explain upside down cars,many burnt and deformed cars over a block away.No controlled demo that we know of has EVER turned the buildings into DUST.
@DiabolicEntity You clearly didn't pay attention. The towers NEVER collapsed - if they had, there would have been corresponding, relevant seismic events and a severely damaged bathtub!
Oklahoma City: obvious culprits, tried and sentenced. It was a bomb, sorry to disappoint you. Burned up cars near a bombed building, not a surprise. Except to this dingbat. Ms. Wood, please look at how cars burn. Please ask firemen and fire experts--that'd be the easiest place to start.
She didn't have time to retort that last lady that just ran her mouth endlessly for the last 5 minutes. Almost all the steel was gone so how can it be shipped anywhere? The rubble was 1 story high, there was nowhere for this molten metal to hide....and if it was actually there, no way dozens of people and rescue workers walk around it and through it to clean up and investigate. Would have simply been too hot and dangerous
"From it's inception, the 9/11 truth movement, and especially from the third year or so, became a controlled opposition and was deeply infiltrated/ penetrated by the co-intelpro.
The proof of this, is the response/ position taken by Stephen Jones, and Richard Gage regarding the work of Dr. Judy Wood. By the way that they respond to the evidence presented in her book; and the evidence is evidence- her book has more evidence about 9/11 than anything ever written, or probably ever will be.
She does not speculate. She does not theorize. She presents the evidence of what we actually see there, and they will not face that evidence.
And that proves that they are co-intelpro: they are part of a controlled opposition. So I would suggest, that when we correct our perception about 9/11, based on the fantastic work, and truly sober and scientific work of Judy Wood, we have a breakthrough towards the correction of our species. "
The idea of such an abundance of self similar thermite chips getting there from random interaction of rust and aluminium does not seem likely. One would expect intermediate or partly formed material. There is no report of powdered aluminium in the dust.
Are we to assume ALL this aluminium dust reacted with available rust.
The important thing is that they were intentionally destroyed one way or another.
Orbs did it. Programmed bioplasma orbs. There are orbs all over the place, the planes were orbs projecting holograms of planes, there were hologram helicopters, fake plasma people (jumpers), fake big black birds everywhere....all the stuff we are seeing now but people don't recognize what they are. Chemtrail planes are the same thing. The people who are involved with chemtrail planes are the ones who did this...Satanic New World Order.
Radio is completely back on the scene. The War of the Gods revisited. Now reality. Human beings, a small group of people acting as if they were gods, making decisions resulting in death, destruction and misery. The People of the USA gave these human beings the task to serve. Instead they became rulers and exploiters to their own benefit and to the benefit of members of their very tiny group.
The most important thing to remember about Wood's hypothesis is free energy.
The next question is where else have we seen evidence for free energy on a large scale?
How about Japan?
What other explanation is there for the tsunamis not resulting in wide-spread, & severe nuclear contamination?
Is it because Japan's utility companies were NOT using nuclear power (except at a minimum) but, essentially, as a facade to disguise the use of free-energy to ensure wide-scale, corporate profits?
The theory of directed energy weapons bringing down the Towers is the ONLY theory that explains it all, as far as I know. No wonder why the "truther" movement doesn't want to talk about it. Neither do they even want to allow a discussion of the no planes theory. They're controlled opposition, liars and hypocrites! They're not interested in open discussion of this subject.
An actual STARGATE/PORTAL-THING was captured on film. The footage can be found within the short-film entitled "SUDDEN PORTHOLE", which is currently parked at the PROJECT CAMELOT YouTube page (it's under the George Noory video).
I'm not selling anything...I'm just trying to spread the word about the unseen-dimensions we find ourselves embedded in.
My BLOG contains the peripheral data regarding the movie and is where I reply to the "debunkers" (use search words "Sam Zurick" & "BLOG"). THANKS!!
@Junglhorse: Your grandiloquence rates preposterous --- it is not about this or that political movement that is under consideration, it is determination of facts that Dr. Judy Wood et al strives to establish, re the 9 11 event(s); specifically, what became of a) the twin towers, b) building 7, c) what occurred with certain peripheral vicinity anomalies, d) what continued to occur at the site in the protracted aftermath of the event(s), e) evaluation of extant analysts' reports
South Park actually suggested exactly what Judy Wood is suggesting here. Except in a more comical sense. They said the conspiracy is really a conspiracy to make people afraid of an ineffectual and flatulent government.
@LordShivasServant check out the video I posted...start donating today...it will take 7 years to accumulate the money and start building. 7 years is going to go by anyway.
And this will be put on pay-perview....can you imagine.....Hey world, we have a identical WTC and we are going to fly a 767 airplane into it, want to watch!...and they will pay to watch....
Lets do something tanigable instead of just books and talking....get invovled!
If explosives or thermite or nukes, or any other type of conventional technology caused the towers to turn to dust as we so clearly saw, then the dust would be HOT. This was not the case, as we all clearly saw folks covered with dust, NOT BURNED. Ergo: ANY CONVENTIONAL TECHNOLOGY is by definition: REFUTED.
Add the fact that the dust particles were about the size of DNA, (the size of molecular structure of matter) and it is evident, irrefutable and conclusive that High Technology was used.
@HerDesher The way it was explained in another video was, the thermite was used to cut the core and support colums. It was shown in many videos and pictures that many of the colums in the lower levels were sliced at a 45 degree angle towards the center of the building. Thats something that is done in demo work. I think thats where the explaination of thermite comes in. The whole business of the conspiracy reflects away from the reason it happened, especially at the pentagon.
Emollition, indeed appears to occur, concurrently wafting of lighter than air micro powdery substance billows skyward, for most of, initially, the upper quarter segment of the South and final of the two, World Trade Center towers, corroborating Dr Judy Wood’s (just search her name on youtube) Dew Dust aka Ebullition Theory: DE-MATERIALIZATION; NO germane seismic THUDs recorded; see, too, newly post VID: 9/11 FOIA Release WPIX Dub4 17.avi
Additionally, consider this u-tube series: MIT 3.60 | Lec 20a: Symmetry, Structure, Tensor Properties of Materials: lots of calculations and simulations were run. ... Thanks Dr Judy Wood, intriguing perspective, re DEW DUST TOWERS 9 11; nano-analysis.
So no, no moron here -- just another set of less than obvious but all so germane observations, re avarice, maniac racial superiority deeply-seated in a derivative religiosity mythos ie, the Talmud, touted by a particular ilk of prognosticators, w fervent desires by same -- neo-TEMPLE cabal -- GOLD extraction, in accord w massively re-written PSALM 105: check eg, Bibles w pub dates pre 1950s verses vs recent pub dates; Hebrew, Eng etc. Education: facts available: Neo-Con-Artist-Manifest Destiny!
I love Dr. Judy but to answer where the Towers went, is exactly where she said...into dust. See all that dust when the towers collapse? That's all concrete dust! These were lightweight designed building made mostly of concrete. These buildings were made with a low ratio of steel. A lightweight design that turned to dust when collapsing from 1100 feet.
@mit26chell "The towers were designed and built in the mid-1960s through the early 1970s. They represented a new approach to skyscrapers in that they were to be very lightweight and involved modular construction methods in order to accelerate the schedule and to reduce the costs." - Thomas W. Eagar and Christopher Musso
REVIEW SERIES, re eg, nano-crystalline and quasi-crystalline structures, as per inert gas techniques for creation of nano-materials: preparation of nano-materials by divergent routes: see this Indian VID series on u-tube: Lec-3 Nano Crystalline Materials ... there are many illuminating relevant parts to this stellar series ..... Lec-17 Mechanical Alloying; Lec-16 Rapid Solidification Processing. Thanks Dr Wood, intriguing perspective, worthy, too, of nano-analysis.
TO ALL THE FAMILIES AFFECTED DIRECTLY BY THE ATTACKS, OR BY LOSING SOMEONE IN THE MILITARY, I AM SORRY FOR YOUR LOSS. GOD BLESS.
I WILL NEVER FORGET.
--->
WAIT: What is it that you will never forget: ... that your foregone conclusion is clearly conveyed by your operative adjective ATTACK; rather, it was an EVENT, whose actual factors are fully known, presently, only to those persons (clearly more than one person: that alone can be deemed FACT) whom perpetrated it.
@roquefortfiles: (I of II) Your snide remark can only be aptly construed for what it is: dork-doom. That said, redirect your mind ... consider this linkage – THE EVENT DID NOT OCCUR sans major bucks ... no simple Telsa hand-held oscillator used: necessitated, at least, was more than a modicum of sophisticated, complex and integrated ... err ... financial planning, so to speak. We have averted a leap of logic from on high but what energy “orbit“ could efficaciously comport such a transgression?
@CarCriticAssessor Open your eyes dude and stop defending a chick making ridiculous remarks. I know an idiot when i see one. PHD aside!! Her comments are ridiculous. You want to defend someone making idiotic observations? Go ahead.
@roquefortfiles: MIT here ... Additionally, consider this u-tube series: MIT 3.60 | Lec 20a: Symmetry, Structure, Tensor Properties of Materials: lots of calculations and simulations were run. ... Thanks Dr Judy Wood, intriguing perspective, re DEW DUST TOWERS 9 11; nano-analysis.
1) Peter Jennings correctly asks, "Where's all the rubble gone? ABC 9/12/01
watch? v=Bg4pEynzmTE (removed from Youtube)
2) Hutchisons's Ytube account was removed?
3) Part 3, 4 & 5 of "Spies Like Us" (removed from HDGilly)
Any ideas about the type of Tesla Weapon used in the movie "Spies Like Us", the General describing it as a "Pulse" of energy. General said he fooled congress in thinking the money was for more Stealth Bombers. Missing $2.3T Anyone?
1) Peter Jennings correctly asks, "Where's all the rubble gone? ABC 9/12/01
watch? v=Bg4pEynzmTE (removed from Youtube)
2) Hutchisons's Youtube account was removed?
3) Part 3, 4 & 5 of "Spies Like Us" (removed from HDGilly)
Any ideas about the type of Tesla Weapon used in the movie "Spies Like Us", the General describing it as a "Pulse" of energy. General said he fooled congress in thinking the money was for more Stealth Bombers. Missing $2.3T Anyone?
1) Peter Jennings correctly asks, "Where's all the rubble gone? ABC 9/12/01
watch?v=Bg4pEynzmTE (removed from Youtube)
2) Hutchisons's Youtube account was removed?
3) Part 3, 4 & 5 of "Spies Like Us" (removed from HDGilly)
Any ideas about the type of Tesla Weapon used in the movie "Spies Like Us", the General describing it as a "Pulse" of energy. General said he fooled congress in thinking the money was for more Stealth Bombers. Missing $2.3T Anyone?
1) Peter Jennings correctly asks, "Where's all the rubble gone? ABC 9/12/01
watch?v=Bg4pEynzmTE (removed from Youtube)
2) Hutchisons's Youtube account was (removed)?
3) Part 3, 4 & 5 of "Spies Like Us" (removed from HDGilly)
Any ideas about the type of Tesla Weapon used in the movie "Spies Like Us", the General describing it as a "Pulse" of energy. General said he fooled congress in thinking the money was for more Stealth Bombers. Missing $2.3T Anyone?
1) Peter Jennings correctly asks, "Where's all the rubble gone? ABC 9/12/01
watch?v=Bg4pEynzmTE (removed from Youtube)
2) Hutchisons's Youtube account was (removed)?
3) Part 3, 4 & 5 of "Spies Like Us" (removed from HDGilly)
Any ideas about the type of Tesla Weapon used in the movie "Spies Like Us", the General describing it as a "Pulse" of energy. General said he fooled congress in thinking the money was for more Stealth Bombers. Missing $2.3T Anyone?
Additionally, consider this u-tube series: MIT 3.60 | Lec 20a: Symmetry, Structure, Tensor Properties of Materials: lots of calculations and simulations were run. ... Thanks Dr Judy Wood, intriguing perspective, re DEW DUST TOWERS 9 11; nano-analysis.
REVIEW SERIES, re eg, nano-crystalline and quasi-crystalline structures, as per inert gas techniques for creation of nano-materials: preparation of nano-materials by divergent routes: see this Indian VID series on u-tube: Lec-3 Nano Crystalline Materials ... there are many illuminating relevant parts to this stellar series ..... Lec-17 Mechanical Alloying; Lec-16 Rapid Solidification Processing. Thanks Dr Wood, intriguing perspective, worthy, too, of nano-analysis.
The Movie "Spies Like Us" with Chevy Chase, Dan Aykroyd (R. Gage and S. Jones) studying for their 9/11 Department of Defense exam:
watch?v=FL9-7AeFD5w
"Spies Like Us" deptics a False-Flag attack against the U.S. using Tesla's Particle Beam Technology, and uses Decoy's, Patsy's, Cover Stories Etc to Deny that their Tesla Weapon Exists, in 1985.
Jesse Ventura -- Is he forever & a day ... artfully disseminating ... err ... clouding analysis ... always conjuring-up bin Laden bogey-man syndrome: GOLDSTIEN 1984; compounding already FULLY DISCOUNTED (non)linkages to purported Bin Laden crew ... he foists - drills it into gullible goyim, thereby, honoring sworn allegiance -- minion he: inculcation game -- for puppet masters: Jesse Ventura & Ron Paul are one & same op: fancy-pants-down-odd-play-angle NWO cleanup act: Kay Griggs; wondering
TO ALL THE FAMILIES AFFECTED DIRECTLY BY THE ATTACKS, OR BY LOSING SOMEONE IN THE MILITARY, I AM SORRY FOR YOUR LOSS. GOD BLESS.
I WILL NEVER FORGET.
--->
WAIT: What is it that you will never forget: ... that your foregone conclusion is clearly conveyed by your operative adjective ATTACK; rather, it was an EVENT, whose actual factors are fully known, presently, only to those persons (clearly more than one person: that alone can be deemed FACT) whom perpetrated it.
FYI: Yahweh -- recorded expressly & graphically -- appeared as a tiny odd looking putty aka cherub, w a facial profile akin to a lamb mated to a goat, & projected a fixed smirk grimace, whose short legs exhibited cloven feet akin to a piglet: of course, too; Ancient Greece: Titan mythology, parents to Zeus & two brothers, 1 of whom, tricked into creation of Kraken ... JEALOUS deities recorded in ancient India periods (predate former two): Visage XENO-TRANSFERENCE; RELIGIOUS books lie; ok
So, what if the people who support wood are not using there critical thinking skills, what if fluoride, mercury, dumbed down educational system, TV has effected our ability to think clearly, people are paid to obscure the truth, indoctrination has shaped our support rational, and some people are micro chiped? google /videoplay?docid=-558096240694803017
youtube /watch?v=pLYrSfnsqb0
What if the elites have duped even the masonic elect ?
@onefodderunit: couldn't agree more!! Just got dr. Judy wood's book not long ago! U can't argue with her findings the lady knows what she's talkin about!! ;-)
There is so much to learn from the September 11 false flag attack that would have fallen by the way were it not for this very courageous and honorable American scientist, Dr. Judy Wood.
Hogwash. Richard Gage and Steven Jones are disinfo. Dr. Judy Wood would happily debate either one of those traitors. Guaranteed neither would accept. Thermite creates intensely bright flames and sparks. If the steel in the Twin Towers had to be burnt through with thermite at every floor, they would have lit up like huge sparklers.
The Twin Towers turned to dust in mid air. All of the videos show it. Here's one in High Def, Slow Motion
@onefodderunit, Its one or the other... Either Judy Wood is the disinfo agent, or Richard Gage, Steven Jones and over 1,500 Architects and Engineers who have signed on to his campaign.
Nanothermite explosives can turn buildings to dust in mid-air too. You don't need some ridiculous and unproven undocumented scientific phenomenon to explain that.
Gage and Jones won't debate Judy Wood because it would be a ridiculous waste of time. Judy Wood is pure CoIntelPro, everyone with a brain knows it.
Nanothermite is an explosive in addition to being an incendiary. Google US Patent 5532449 and read the description.
Your lie: "Thermite would have to burn through [sic] every floor"
Why every floor? Why not every other floor? Why not just the floors we see explosions on which also happen to be the exact same floors which received fire-proofing upgrades in the 3 years before 9/11, where suspicious CIA connected companies worked.
Are you The David Atlee Philips, 'ex' CIA, or a pretender?
You advised "Google US Patent . . . "
From the patent "generating a plasma arc from the plasma torch of a plasma arc generator, mixing thermite powder with a supply gas for the plasma torch, "
Where does it say that plasma is an explosive, as you have claimed?
Are you suggesting plasma torches and nano thermite were used to turn the Twin Towers to dust in mid air, or only nano-thermite?
Excuse me. You didn't claim that plasma is an explosive. That was a typing error on my part.
The patent which you cited does not say that nano thermite is an explosive. Nano thermite is not an explosive and was not the energy which transformed the Twin Towers to dust.
@onefodderunit, The patent I cited shows how nanothermite can be used to demolish concrete at a high efficiency. I agree it uses another gas mixed with thermite and that this creates a plasma arc. The only scientific point I need to prove is that nanothermite technology could be used to create the phenomena observed on 9/11.
Now it's your turn to prove that your direct energy weapons could have done the same thing. Then make a testable prediction. That's how REAL science works.
@DavidAtleePhilips Another lie of yours: "unproven undocumented scientific phenomenon to explain that."
Unclassified DEW weapons in the form of High-Energy Radio-Frequency (HERF) are operational in the US and in the Izzie military.
>> Raytheon's experimentation with directed energy weapons began when its research labs' experiments had inadvertently produced the first microwave oven in 1958. -
They've been developing these weapons for over 50 years.
@onefodderunit, Show me an example of these weapons vaporizing steel, separating out the manganese and carbon from the alloy, then oxidizing the leftover iron and solidifying it in a nanoscale matrix similar to the nanothermites discovered in the WTC dust.
I'll be waiting for you to give me an example.
Judy Wood humiliates herself every time she speaks. She is the most unscientific spoken person with a Ph.D. in science that I have ever heard.
You were asked first. Where's an example of nano thermite turning any material to dust?
Please correct my grammar, since you have an issue: Thermite would have to burn through 2" thick steel walls of 47 box columns at every floor. Do you see a pancake demo of every floor, every other floor, or no pancaking at all?
@onefodderunit, uhm... That would be right where it says "an apparatus which can demolish a concrete structure at a high efficiency while preventing a secondary problem due to noise, flying dust and chips, and the like." ... which is right before it says "mixing thermite powder with a supply gas for the plasma torch, passing the mixture of thermite powder and supply gas to the plasma arc, directing the plasma arc at the surface of the concrete structure."
No, it's not my turn. Can you admit that you can't find a single example of thermite, or nano thermite turning any type of material into dust, Yes, or No?
Be clear. Are you reversing your previous claim that nano thermite alone is an explosive, Yes, or no?
You knew the patent which you've cited does not make the claim that nano thermite alone is an explosive, didn't you?
Thermite flames emit UV light and will give your eyes welder's burn.
@onefodderunit, Can you admit that you can't find a single example of DEW turning any material into dust? Why do you have double standards with strong bias towards your own hypothesis? Is this how science is done? No REAL science does experiments and publishes papers for peer review. Check Bentham Open for the nanothermite paper and let me know when Judy Wood publishes something substantial on her Hutchison Effect.
UV light is invisible... Are you retarded or something?
UV light will damage your eyes and exemplifies the brightness of thermite flames. Why isn't a thermite flame visible in a video of the Towers turning to dust?
No, you can't find a single example of thermite, or nano thermite turning any type of material into dust, because nano thermite is an incendiary, not an explosive, which you lied about.
You lie for the mass murderers.
Evidence is not hypothesis. Do you deny the evidence of all videos showing the Twin Towers turning to dust in mid air?
@onefodderunit, Even regular thermite can pulverize concrete... Wait a while and I will show you the experiments to prove it! Nanoscale reagents simply increase the surface area and therefor reaction rate, turning incendiaries into explosives. I didn't lie about anything you retard. Evidence is not hypothesis but you obviously don't understand the difference because Judy Wood gives BOTH, but like an unscientific unskeptical sheep you follow what she says without question. Easily mislead.
Thermite or 'nan-thermite' is an incendiary, not an explosive. It generates a lot of sparks and flames so intense they will give your eyes welder's burns. The flames emit ultra violet light, they are so intense.
There is no evidence of thermite flames or sparks in this youtube video:
What I don’t understand is how a massive conspiracy such as 9-11, which would have required literally hundreds of insiders to plan and execute, could happen and no one comes forth with the truth in the past decade. A vast number of people would have been required to complete such a broad ranged project. Included in the conspirators would be political, military, law enforcement, CIA, FBI and media. To hold such tight reign of information control, with such a broad ranged conspiracy is suspect.
@dueycrim Your assumption is pure bunk. I am aware some people say they think maybe someone should investigate further. Sorry, that doesn't count as "comming out". What I want is someone INVOLVED in the conspiracy who has the courage to tell all they know. I am not saying that there cannot be a conspiracy. For instance. who killed all those passengers who were on the airplanes that were diverted so the remote controlled planes collided with their targets?
3 NUKES 5 BOMBS A MISSILE A DEMOLITION CREW AND A LOT OF LIES = 911
dhudson369 3 days ago
This has been flagged as spam show
thanks for the upload
1111alien1111 5 days ago
This has been flagged as spam show
OATH ★ KEEPER: Military brass, CIA & FBI now reveal 9/11 lies & kept secrets. houmadabrave on both Facebook & MySpace
CLANSON®
Create Local Awareness Networks to Secure Our Nation
houmadabrave 5 days ago
This looks interesting but I couldn't sit through it - let alone truly listen with the distracting background music. A shame. Hoping there is another version somewhere.
212sillylilly 6 days ago
Idiot science/physics proves demolition + thousands experts. They responded good lol
Headshothorror4488 1 week ago
Dr. Judy Wood is a very courageous woman. We need more Americans like her.
uutttg 1 week ago
High Frequency Active Auroral Research Program (HAARP) has links between HAARP and the work of Nikola Tesla (particularly potential combinations of HAARP energy with Tesla's work on pneumatic small-scale earthquake generation).
HTexas1965 1 week ago
A directed-energy weapon (DEW) emits energy in an aimed direction without the means of a projectile. It transfers energy to a target for a desired effect. Intended effects may be non-lethal or lethal. Some such weapons are real, or are under active research and development.
HTexas1965 1 week ago
So where are all the youtube haters telling the poster of this video to go hang themself? Where are all the people who believe the planes took down the towers and why aren't they bombarding this video with their ignorance like in every other conspiracy video on youtube?
scheshire7 2 weeks ago
I hate how she pauses after evry couple words... Maybe shes doing it for effect but it makes it hard to follow and makes her seem confused..
cooliohernendez 2 weeks ago
@cooliohernendez She is on skype... Have you ever used it? Try it and you'll see why the pauses are occurring.
godbluffvdgg 6 days ago
This must be one dangerous piece of information, why, you wouldn't want people to observe&listen and make up their very own minds about something now would you Won't tube?
wat700son 3 weeks ago
wat700son, it' spelled Americka
saladfork8 3 weeks ago
@saladfork8 I'm sorry, you're right-I was misedumucated here in the U.S.S.A.
wat700son 3 weeks ago
Something appears to be terribly wrong here in the good ol' U.S.S.A. I've been trying and trying to e-mail this vid~No Chance. It's called censorship, Russia, China, now it's here in Amerika. It's pathetic to think that the system is so threatened by the simple act of sharing information in order for people to make up their own minds. This tyranical bullshit has never worked before......And it's NOT going to work this time either, so put THAT in your pipe and smoke it "Youtube" Father Fuckers!!!
wat700son 3 weeks ago
Youtube is censuring this vid-Youtube is STOPPING me from sending it! WHY?? Too Much Truth? Youtube, you look like a horses ass when you do this
wat700son 3 weeks ago
WHY can I NOT e-mail this vid? Huh Youtube?
wat700son 3 weeks ago
@LOPRESTI68 There were so many camera's looking up at towers after the first tower was "struck" so I'd argue its irrefutable that a plane hit the SECOND tower. The clear evidence is how WTC1,2, and 7 fell. And how complete, symmetrical, they fell. As well as how much concrete was turned to dust. Just doesn't happen in any natural collapse
TheSmittel 3 weeks ago
@godbluffvdgg Nice post.. But honestly, I get tired of of people expecting "experts" to tell them what they can readily see. It demoralizes regular civilians to being less than human. And people in NYC died like cattle b/c of those demolitions.
TheSmittel 3 weeks ago 2
And yes I do realise she has a book to sell
fiftypeehead 4 weeks ago
This is an extremely clever and rational woman. I like the fact that she doesn't seem completely comfortable speaking to a large audience. Means to me that she genuinely feels she has to be on there and not because she's a fast talker who just wants to be heard
fiftypeehead 4 weeks ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Open for new ideals -to make this world we live in a better place.The time has come that we all pitch in an Help!! Not just stand back an look. Thank you - have a bless day.
myplace4118 1 month ago
Judy Wood is a Hero to Humanity
YankeeClippa 1 month ago 2
I know this is hard to believe, but our goverment lies to us about ALOT thingS!!!!
kiki196571 1 month ago
People don't want to know the truth, use it at you'r advantage for exemple, before a war with Iran, invest in lock it and bomb it martin.
BarelyScientist 1 month ago
I DO NOT BELIEVE PLANES HIT THE BUILDING I BELIEVE THEY USED HALLAGRAMS IF YOU LOOK AT PROJECT BLUE BEAM YOU START TO UNDERSTAND SOME OF THE GREAT TECHNOLOGY THEY HAVE.
LOPRESTI68 1 month ago 2
Just because this woman has B.S. (Civil Engineering, 1981) (Structural Engineering), M.S. (Engineering Mechanics (Applied Physics), 1983), and Ph.D. (Materials Engineering Science, 1992). That doesn't qualify her to determine the reasons the towers collapsed on that day...OH WAIT... IT DOES.
godbluffvdgg 1 month ago 12
@godbluffvdgg despite her credentials..she is still wrong.
She is a disgrace to the 911 truth movement.
If you want the real story then i suggest you look up the work by people like Richard Gage, David Chandler and Steven Jones.
Credentials count for nothing.
Only the truth and evidence matter.
studmalexy 6 days ago
@studmalexy My friend I was a member of ae911 when they only had 100 architects. So, I am well aware of those gentlemen. I have a bit of education myself. An architect i.e. Richard and Jones is a Mormon, dubious at best, isn't the same as a materials analysis engineer. If you look at her evidence, as I did, with an open mind, she makes very valid points that touch your truth chords. But, I wish you well and regardless of your position; 911 is still an inside job. peace
godbluffvdgg 6 days ago
al-CIA-duh was made by the CIA, duh
spystyle 1 month ago
Workers reported explosions in the basement. So there were definitely bombs, but perhaps also an energy weapon ?
spystyle 1 month ago
@spystyle Consider that, as Dr. Wood suggests, an explosion does not mean evidence of a "bomb," unless you consider an egg exploding in a microwave the equivalent of a bomb exploding.
Crust218 1 month ago
There were no planes on 911. See Simon Shack's "September Clues". They were in fact JASSM missiles.
Until this interview I thought the building was "poofed" with super thermite.
Now I am confused LOL
spystyle 1 month ago
Dr Judy Wood is a hero and a very blessed person. The entire country if not the world should congratulate her and demand a proper investigation. God knows there are so many people who have been offed, we all need to protect her and ensure she is safe. I am sending money for body guards and I hope others will do this too. We must stop the NWO and the pigs who are destroying our country. Why is there always a problem? Rumsfeld is the clue in this case.
freidarulz 2 months ago
No planes hit the buildings.
GeoffreyBernardo 2 months ago
Comment removed
masonfreeparty 2 months ago
I've sold over 1000 of dr wood's dvds on ebay...to all over the world...surely we must be approaching tipping point and its only a question when the mainstream media will succumb to this truth pressure...i'd like to see all the so called physics university professors be held to account for ignoring the 911 truth
masonfreeparty 2 months ago
23:19 "i can't tell exactly what" dr wood makes no claims, only suppresses the claims made by others and inspires free thinking in the country whose FIRST AMENDMENT is free speech.... Her point of view has cost her more in a decade then most of us will ever earn or even LEARN in a lifetime.
51Wargs51 2 months ago
i love judy !
illba1 2 months ago 2
Excellent. Another theory that costs $40 to learn. This one must be right
Thund3rsmurf 2 months ago
Time for some CSI action.
jschrauwen 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Fireworks display by Cai Guo-Qiang at the Arab Museum of Modern Art in Dohari demonstrates the lightning speed that detonation charges can be set off using computers. Notice how sound can appear to be one continuous roar. Much in the same way that the 3 WTC buildings were brought down by controlled demolition in Set 11, 2001 at near free fall speeds. Easy when you have the technology.
watch?v=bR5NmbHdUUs
harryramma 2 months ago
Dr Wood was fired for questioning the govt story. For pointing to evidence and asking - what accounts for these findings? What made these police cars on the bridge incinerate - located miles away from the towers. What left cars flipped over that day? And what would cause remaining rubble to produce heat weeks after the towers fell, that workers had to replace their boots every few hours.
She is a brave soul, and I applaud her efforts.
xvepicvx 2 months ago 15
@xvepicvx What about many cars being towed to further points of the city to clear the room for emergency veh's? Then after pics were taken of those cars as though they had melted there?
yourboycal 2 months ago
@yourboycal listen bozzo...try engaging your brain before you write
masonfreeparty 2 months ago
@masonfreeparty Is that all you have to say ? No counter points or anything ? Just straight to banging your head on the wall and crying names ? Use reason and logic my good man . Character assination only comforts you temporarily
yourboycal 2 months ago
The clapping hands comment is so awkward i couldn't even listen to it. Poor old lady :S
MegaYeshua33 2 months ago
@DiabolicEntity
If you listen to how she explains it through the same effects we see in tornado/hurricanes, then it would be simple science. Perhaps you should research Walter Russell before you go off.
WAHsu 2 months ago
From 1:22:51 Dr Judy Wood speaks truth till 1:22:58 again! You cannot argue with fact.
WAHsu 2 months ago
I use quotes to emphasize words, mostly because I suck at the English language at best.
But...
An alternative question then would be how do we 'id' / 'identify' 'governments'? Which would in the end be simply people/persons?
WAHsu 2 months ago
From 38:20 Dr Judy Wood is damn honest with what she says to 38:45. This is FACT. Non negotiable folks!
WAHsu 2 months ago
Thanks for uploading this! I would have missed out, much like her other shows which are on 'pay to watch' subscriptions.
WAHsu 2 months ago
Funny how the 'insiders' or 'drones' all use "dingbat" and other names to subliminally discredit Dr Judy Wood further!
Its sad, and if you are part of it consciously then.... shame, shame on you.
WAHsu 2 months ago
@WAHsu It`s a pity is`nt it!.All of us should be on the same page,wanting to find out what happened,if someone of obvious intellegence says that they think a particular way was used then that possibility should be examined,not just blown off.
In 1945 a new weapon was unleashed on the world,very few people new of its existence, who is to say a newer weapon was not used on this day.All evidence needs to be looked at.Dr Wood`s book is BRILLIANTLY simplistic to read and understand.
2000tc88 2 months ago
@2000tc88 I thought we were. This is why we communicate right now no?
I seek truth as I assumed you did. :P
WAHsu 2 months ago
@WAHsu Yes thats right
2000tc88 2 months ago
Judy Wood is a dingbat for obsessing over all of the actual evidence - and then submitting it as a legal case against the NIST contractors.
Why can't she stick to doggedly defending a particular theory carefully weaved together from both evidence and assumption and then relentlessly preach it to the poor worn out 9/11 truth movement until it becomes a mantra, while making sure to stay well clear of the courts.
Totally unprofessional.
theawecabinet 2 months ago
Comment removed
jusbelli 2 months ago
@theawecabinet I would have thought you need to look at all the "actual evidence" to get to the truth.
You`re second sentence sounds like you`re talking about some other people out there in the truth movement who will NOT look at all the evidence.
Dr Judy Wood is certainly no dingbat,she would not have held her teaching position for as long as she did if she was,and she would probably still be doing that if not for BRAVELY speaking out.
2000tc88 2 months ago
@2000tc88 "....I would have thought you need to look at all the "actual evidence" to get to the truth...."
Another dingbat......Unbelievable!
(sarcasm) ;)
theawecabinet 2 months ago
@theawecabinet Yeah YOU wrote it "actual evidence" in your previous comment,calling yourself names now hey!.I am merely saying look at ALL of it not just the parts YOU want to see.
Question,Did you even watch and listen to all of this video?.
Question,Have you read her book?.
2000tc88 2 months ago
@2000tc88
My bad. Sarcasm not detected.
Please read my original comment with a large amount of sarcasm ;)
theawecabinet 2 months ago
@theawecabinet Right!,you know your being sarcastic,other people do not and when you get a reply you start name calling.Thats Brilliant.
2000tc88 2 months ago
@2000tc88
Sorry I really thought it was obvious.
OMG what if the majority of the resistance to the truth (and supporters of the official story) are actually people like me who are just being sarcastic?!
theawecabinet 2 months ago
@theawecabinet your comment shows a large inability to articulate. I hope you can improve your argument. Evidence and Assumption? When evidence is examined properly it speaks for itself and no assumptions are necessary. Plenty of folks continue buying into the shoveled crap that is being labeled 'sugar' while Wood does not assert any theory. 'Obsessing over actual evidence' is as inherent to truth as visible light is to any seer. Further Judy IS in the courts last i checked, dingbat
51Wargs51 2 months ago
@51Wargs51
I apologise (once again) for my misconstrued sarcasm.
Please read some of the other comments and exchanges for a full explanation.....
Yes, Dr Wood rocks :)
theawecabinet 2 months ago
@theawecabinet fair enough, but perhaps the sarcasm is being viewed as apathy. Dr. Wood does rock though, well said
51Wargs51 2 months ago
@51Wargs51
My sarcasm was my way of exposing the unfounded and hypocritical ridicule and derision usually levelled at the people in society who are the most level headed and rational (in this case, Dr Wood).
But using sarcasm in youtube comments never works because everyone always takes you literally! ;)
theawecabinet 2 months ago
Quick question. Is it really cointelpro when people argue about HOW the government took down the towers....I mean these people are not questioning the government's involvement. So whether you believe it was taken down by nanothermite, TNT, or leprachauns that chopped down the support beams, if you agree that the government did it, WE NEED A PROSECUTION, and then we can figure out EXACTLY HOW THEY DID IT. THIS BICKERING IS COINTELPRO. WHO CARES IF OJ USED A KNIFE OR SCISSORS? FIND OUT LATER.
exxx247 3 months ago
@exxx247 > WHO CARES IF OJ USED A KNIFE OR SCISSORS?
Ummm.... but to bring a case, you need evidence to determine which of those it is. Typing in capitals does not make a case. And until you study the evidence, as Dr Judy Wood has, in relation to 9/11, you really will not know what you're dealing with. I didn't - until about 2007-by which time I HAD studied the evidence (and now I have had to write a book about it-in part due to comments like yours by people who THINK they know what happened)
checktheevidence 2 months ago
@checktheevidence
I didn't mean it from that perspective. I was addressing the fact that people were accusing both sides of being cointelpro. As far as I know, and I think most others would agree, the main 'conspiracy theories' which are really a mishmash of possibilities for the most part, have either more or the same amount of validity with the limited available evidence as does Wood. And I used caps because I was pissed. So to accuse either side of COINTELPRO is counter-productive at least
exxx247 2 months ago
@exxx247 by the way personally i think her theory is a bit 'out there' because this could have all been done using far more conventional means than she proposes, furthermore there is quite a bit of evidence supporting the usage of said means. although i have not read her book.
exxx247 2 months ago
@exxx247 What conventional means though?.Please buy the book and read it,Dr Wood as you have heard from this recording is not specifically laying blame on anyone,all she says is look at the evidence that was around on that day and make up your own mind.For me,a controlled demolition does not explain upside down cars,many burnt and deformed cars over a block away.No controlled demo that we know of has EVER turned the buildings into DUST.
2000tc88 2 months ago
@exxx247
And how do you 'prosecute' a government?
WAHsu 2 months ago
@WAHsu
Not sure why the quotes, but that's a good question. Some may answer 'by any means necessary'
exxx247 2 months ago
@BrowserDoggie Not true. The effects occur only at the points of interference of the static field and RF waves. They can be controlled, and directed.
mit26chell 3 months ago
@DiabolicEntity You clearly didn't pay attention. The towers NEVER collapsed - if they had, there would have been corresponding, relevant seismic events and a severely damaged bathtub!
mit26chell 3 months ago
Oklahoma City: obvious culprits, tried and sentenced. It was a bomb, sorry to disappoint you. Burned up cars near a bombed building, not a surprise. Except to this dingbat. Ms. Wood, please look at how cars burn. Please ask firemen and fire experts--that'd be the easiest place to start.
belowthepovertyline 3 months ago
WE SUPPORT THE WORK OF JUDY WOOD......BUT LETS DO SOMETHING TAINGABLE....
SUPPORT THE SEPT 11TH, RESEARCH AND DISCOVERY PROJECT!
SUBSCRIBE TODAY!
Sept11Discovery 3 months ago
She didn't have time to retort that last lady that just ran her mouth endlessly for the last 5 minutes. Almost all the steel was gone so how can it be shipped anywhere? The rubble was 1 story high, there was nowhere for this molten metal to hide....and if it was actually there, no way dozens of people and rescue workers walk around it and through it to clean up and investigate. Would have simply been too hot and dangerous
TSMPimpDaddyPain 3 months ago
"From it's inception, the 9/11 truth movement, and especially from the third year or so, became a controlled opposition and was deeply infiltrated/ penetrated by the co-intelpro.
The proof of this, is the response/ position taken by Stephen Jones, and Richard Gage regarding the work of Dr. Judy Wood. By the way that they respond to the evidence presented in her book; and the evidence is evidence- her book has more evidence about 9/11 than anything ever written, or probably ever will be.
HerDesher 3 months ago
She does not speculate. She does not theorize. She presents the evidence of what we actually see there, and they will not face that evidence.
And that proves that they are co-intelpro: they are part of a controlled opposition. So I would suggest, that when we correct our perception about 9/11, based on the fantastic work, and truly sober and scientific work of Judy Wood, we have a breakthrough towards the correction of our species. "
HerDesher 3 months ago
Why not thermite as well as the "energy weapons".
The idea of such an abundance of self similar thermite chips getting there from random interaction of rust and aluminium does not seem likely. One would expect intermediate or partly formed material. There is no report of powdered aluminium in the dust.
Are we to assume ALL this aluminium dust reacted with available rust.
The important thing is that they were intentionally destroyed one way or another.
MrRobtwothirds 3 months ago
Orbs did it. Programmed bioplasma orbs. There are orbs all over the place, the planes were orbs projecting holograms of planes, there were hologram helicopters, fake plasma people (jumpers), fake big black birds everywhere....all the stuff we are seeing now but people don't recognize what they are. Chemtrail planes are the same thing. The people who are involved with chemtrail planes are the ones who did this...Satanic New World Order.
ella5024 3 months ago
Radio is completely back on the scene. The War of the Gods revisited. Now reality. Human beings, a small group of people acting as if they were gods, making decisions resulting in death, destruction and misery. The People of the USA gave these human beings the task to serve. Instead they became rulers and exploiters to their own benefit and to the benefit of members of their very tiny group.
eskatee 3 months ago
The most important thing to remember about Wood's hypothesis is free energy.
The next question is where else have we seen evidence for free energy on a large scale?
How about Japan?
What other explanation is there for the tsunamis not resulting in wide-spread, & severe nuclear contamination?
Is it because Japan's utility companies were NOT using nuclear power (except at a minimum) but, essentially, as a facade to disguise the use of free-energy to ensure wide-scale, corporate profits?
bondurango 4 months ago
The theory of directed energy weapons bringing down the Towers is the ONLY theory that explains it all, as far as I know. No wonder why the "truther" movement doesn't want to talk about it. Neither do they even want to allow a discussion of the no planes theory. They're controlled opposition, liars and hypocrites! They're not interested in open discussion of this subject.
Sion6 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
An actual STARGATE/PORTAL-THING was captured on film. The footage can be found within the short-film entitled "SUDDEN PORTHOLE", which is currently parked at the PROJECT CAMELOT YouTube page (it's under the George Noory video).
I'm not selling anything...I'm just trying to spread the word about the unseen-dimensions we find ourselves embedded in.
My BLOG contains the peripheral data regarding the movie and is where I reply to the "debunkers" (use search words "Sam Zurick" & "BLOG"). THANKS!!
peopledick 4 months ago
I can see maybe concrete turning to dust as it fell, but i cant wrap my head around where all the steel went ..the pile didnt match the debri
2020starman 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@Junglhorse: Your grandiloquence rates preposterous --- it is not about this or that political movement that is under consideration, it is determination of facts that Dr. Judy Wood et al strives to establish, re the 9 11 event(s); specifically, what became of a) the twin towers, b) building 7, c) what occurred with certain peripheral vicinity anomalies, d) what continued to occur at the site in the protracted aftermath of the event(s), e) evaluation of extant analysts' reports
CarCriticAssessor 4 months ago
South Park actually suggested exactly what Judy Wood is suggesting here. Except in a more comical sense. They said the conspiracy is really a conspiracy to make people afraid of an ineffectual and flatulent government.
LordShivasServant 4 months ago
Lets stop talking about....it is time for action. Lets expose the False Flag Event.
SUPPORT THE SEPTEMBER 11th, 2001 DISCOVERY PROJECT!
Contact us for Information!
Sept11Discovery 4 months ago
@Sept11Discovery lol How do you plan on doing that, mind I ask?
LordShivasServant 4 months ago
@LordShivasServant check out the video I posted...start donating today...it will take 7 years to accumulate the money and start building. 7 years is going to go by anyway.
And this will be put on pay-perview....can you imagine.....Hey world, we have a identical WTC and we are going to fly a 767 airplane into it, want to watch!...and they will pay to watch....
Lets do something tanigable instead of just books and talking....get invovled!
Sept11Discovery 4 months ago
@Sept11Discovery Your comment my friend is absolute fu*king genius ! best regards :)
trouzercoff 1 month ago
If explosives or thermite or nukes, or any other type of conventional technology caused the towers to turn to dust as we so clearly saw, then the dust would be HOT. This was not the case, as we all clearly saw folks covered with dust, NOT BURNED. Ergo: ANY CONVENTIONAL TECHNOLOGY is by definition: REFUTED.
Add the fact that the dust particles were about the size of DNA, (the size of molecular structure of matter) and it is evident, irrefutable and conclusive that High Technology was used.
HerDesher 4 months ago
@HerDesher The way it was explained in another video was, the thermite was used to cut the core and support colums. It was shown in many videos and pictures that many of the colums in the lower levels were sliced at a 45 degree angle towards the center of the building. Thats something that is done in demo work. I think thats where the explaination of thermite comes in. The whole business of the conspiracy reflects away from the reason it happened, especially at the pentagon.
dominic150 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Emollition, indeed appears to occur, concurrently wafting of lighter than air micro powdery substance billows skyward, for most of, initially, the upper quarter segment of the South and final of the two, World Trade Center towers, corroborating Dr Judy Wood’s (just search her name on youtube) Dew Dust aka Ebullition Theory: DE-MATERIALIZATION; NO germane seismic THUDs recorded; see, too, newly post VID: 9/11 FOIA Release WPIX Dub4 17.avi
CarCriticAssessor 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Additionally, consider this u-tube series: MIT 3.60 | Lec 20a: Symmetry, Structure, Tensor Properties of Materials: lots of calculations and simulations were run. ... Thanks Dr Judy Wood, intriguing perspective, re DEW DUST TOWERS 9 11; nano-analysis.
CarCriticAssessor 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
So no, no moron here -- just another set of less than obvious but all so germane observations, re avarice, maniac racial superiority deeply-seated in a derivative religiosity mythos ie, the Talmud, touted by a particular ilk of prognosticators, w fervent desires by same -- neo-TEMPLE cabal -- GOLD extraction, in accord w massively re-written PSALM 105: check eg, Bibles w pub dates pre 1950s verses vs recent pub dates; Hebrew, Eng etc. Education: facts available: Neo-Con-Artist-Manifest Destiny!
CarCriticAssessor 4 months ago
Comment removed
CarCriticAssessor 4 months ago
Comment removed
CarCriticAssessor 4 months ago
explain the damage to the vehicles please someone ok & planes that have no windows one minute next news report they have some does not add up ok rq
& an aircraft that was supposed the to hit the pentagon with no wings funny ok
rquick7 5 months ago
explain the damage to the vehicles please someone ok & planes that have no windows one minute next news report they have some does not add up ok rq
rquick7 5 months ago
I love Dr. Judy but to answer where the Towers went, is exactly where she said...into dust. See all that dust when the towers collapse? That's all concrete dust! These were lightweight designed building made mostly of concrete. These buildings were made with a low ratio of steel. A lightweight design that turned to dust when collapsing from 1100 feet.
1971SuperLead 5 months ago
@1971SuperLead Somehow you've been misinformed. Each WTC tower weighed appx half a million tons, including over 230,000 tons of steel.
mit26chell 4 months ago
@mit26chell "The towers were designed and built in the mid-1960s through the early 1970s. They represented a new approach to skyscrapers in that they were to be very lightweight and involved modular construction methods in order to accelerate the schedule and to reduce the costs." - Thomas W. Eagar and Christopher Musso
For there size....they were "very lightweight".
1971SuperLead 4 months ago
REVIEW SERIES, re eg, nano-crystalline and quasi-crystalline structures, as per inert gas techniques for creation of nano-materials: preparation of nano-materials by divergent routes: see this Indian VID series on u-tube: Lec-3 Nano Crystalline Materials ... there are many illuminating relevant parts to this stellar series ..... Lec-17 Mechanical Alloying; Lec-16 Rapid Solidification Processing. Thanks Dr Wood, intriguing perspective, worthy, too, of nano-analysis.
CarCriticAssessor 5 months ago
FYI, re typical 9 II postings:
TO ALL THE FAMILIES AFFECTED DIRECTLY BY THE ATTACKS, OR BY LOSING SOMEONE IN THE MILITARY, I AM SORRY FOR YOUR LOSS. GOD BLESS.
I WILL NEVER FORGET.
--->
WAIT: What is it that you will never forget: ... that your foregone conclusion is clearly conveyed by your operative adjective ATTACK; rather, it was an EVENT, whose actual factors are fully known, presently, only to those persons (clearly more than one person: that alone can be deemed FACT) whom perpetrated it.
CarCriticAssessor 5 months ago
@roquefortfiles: (I of II) Your snide remark can only be aptly construed for what it is: dork-doom. That said, redirect your mind ... consider this linkage – THE EVENT DID NOT OCCUR sans major bucks ... no simple Telsa hand-held oscillator used: necessitated, at least, was more than a modicum of sophisticated, complex and integrated ... err ... financial planning, so to speak. We have averted a leap of logic from on high but what energy “orbit“ could efficaciously comport such a transgression?
CarCriticAssessor 5 months ago
@CarCriticAssessor Open your eyes dude and stop defending a chick making ridiculous remarks. I know an idiot when i see one. PHD aside!! Her comments are ridiculous. You want to defend someone making idiotic observations? Go ahead.
roquefortfiles 5 months ago
@roquefortfiles: MIT here ... Additionally, consider this u-tube series: MIT 3.60 | Lec 20a: Symmetry, Structure, Tensor Properties of Materials: lots of calculations and simulations were run. ... Thanks Dr Judy Wood, intriguing perspective, re DEW DUST TOWERS 9 11; nano-analysis.
CarCriticAssessor 5 months ago
@roquefortfiles: Weaponry update; see this youtube VID::
- Directed Energy Weapons used in Iraq (Part 1 of 3)
Thanks Dr Judy Wood; intriguing perspective worthy of incisive nano-analysis!
CarCriticAssessor 5 months ago
@CarCriticAssessor Nonsense update!!
A floor with a load limit of 1500 tons. Being asked to contain 180,000 tons falling on it.
Put down your Buck Rogers DC comic books and step in to the REAL world.
roquefortfiles 5 months ago
Comment removed
CarCriticAssessor 5 months ago
Comment removed
CarCriticAssessor 5 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Censors are busy:
1) Peter Jennings correctly asks, "Where's all the rubble gone? ABC 9/12/01
watch? v=Bg4pEynzmTE (removed from Youtube)
2) Hutchisons's Ytube account was removed?
3) Part 3, 4 & 5 of "Spies Like Us" (removed from HDGilly)
Any ideas about the type of Tesla Weapon used in the movie "Spies Like Us", the General describing it as a "Pulse" of energy. General said he fooled congress in thinking the money was for more Stealth Bombers. Missing $2.3T Anyone?
watch? v=raWZraPHLqM
disney9139 5 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Censors are busy:
1) Peter Jennings correctly asks, "Where's all the rubble gone? ABC 9/12/01
watch? v=Bg4pEynzmTE (removed from Youtube)
2) Hutchisons's Youtube account was removed?
3) Part 3, 4 & 5 of "Spies Like Us" (removed from HDGilly)
Any ideas about the type of Tesla Weapon used in the movie "Spies Like Us", the General describing it as a "Pulse" of energy. General said he fooled congress in thinking the money was for more Stealth Bombers. Missing $2.3T Anyone?
watch? v=raWZraPHLqM
disney9139 5 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Censors are busy:
1) Peter Jennings correctly asks, "Where's all the rubble gone? ABC 9/12/01
watch?v=Bg4pEynzmTE (removed from Youtube)
2) Hutchisons's Youtube account was removed?
3) Part 3, 4 & 5 of "Spies Like Us" (removed from HDGilly)
Any ideas about the type of Tesla Weapon used in the movie "Spies Like Us", the General describing it as a "Pulse" of energy. General said he fooled congress in thinking the money was for more Stealth Bombers. Missing $2.3T Anyone?
watch?v=raWZraPHLqM
disney9139 5 months ago
Censors are busy:
1) Peter Jennings correctly asks, "Where's all the rubble gone? ABC 9/12/01
watch?v=Bg4pEynzmTE (removed from Youtube)
2) Hutchisons's Youtube account was (removed)?
3) Part 3, 4 & 5 of "Spies Like Us" (removed from HDGilly)
Any ideas about the type of Tesla Weapon used in the movie "Spies Like Us", the General describing it as a "Pulse" of energy. General said he fooled congress in thinking the money was for more Stealth Bombers. Missing $2.3T Anyone?
watch?v=raWZraPHLqM
disney9139 5 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Censors are busy:
1) Peter Jennings correctly asks, "Where's all the rubble gone? ABC 9/12/01
watch?v=Bg4pEynzmTE (removed from Youtube)
2) Hutchisons's Youtube account was (removed)?
3) Part 3, 4 & 5 of "Spies Like Us" (removed from HDGilly)
Any ideas about the type of Tesla Weapon used in the movie "Spies Like Us", the General describing it as a "Pulse" of energy. General said he fooled congress in thinking the money was for more Stealth Bombers. Missing $2.3T Anyone?
watch?v=raWZraPHLqM
disney9139 5 months ago
Comment removed
CarCriticAssessor 5 months ago
Additionally, consider this u-tube series: MIT 3.60 | Lec 20a: Symmetry, Structure, Tensor Properties of Materials: lots of calculations and simulations were run. ... Thanks Dr Judy Wood, intriguing perspective, re DEW DUST TOWERS 9 11; nano-analysis.
CarCriticAssessor 5 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
REVIEW SERIES, re eg, nano-crystalline and quasi-crystalline structures, as per inert gas techniques for creation of nano-materials: preparation of nano-materials by divergent routes: see this Indian VID series on u-tube: Lec-3 Nano Crystalline Materials ... there are many illuminating relevant parts to this stellar series ..... Lec-17 Mechanical Alloying; Lec-16 Rapid Solidification Processing. Thanks Dr Wood, intriguing perspective, worthy, too, of nano-analysis.
CarCriticAssessor 5 months ago
Comment removed
CarCriticAssessor 5 months ago
The Movie "Spies Like Us" with Chevy Chase, Dan Aykroyd (R. Gage and S. Jones) studying for their 9/11 Department of Defense exam:
watch?v=FL9-7AeFD5w
"Spies Like Us" deptics a False-Flag attack against the U.S. using Tesla's Particle Beam Technology, and uses Decoy's, Patsy's, Cover Stories Etc to Deny that their Tesla Weapon Exists, in 1985.
Jennings & Stephanopoulos correctly asks, "Where's all the rubble gone? ABC 12:44 pm 9/12/01
watch?v=Bg4pEynzmTE
disney9139 5 months ago
@disney9139: Well ... intriguing, yet again. Thanks for that.
CarCriticAssessor 5 months ago
perhaps is was harrp??...and...discuss..
hencan99 5 months ago
i love coast to coast am!
yvetteaonmyown 5 months ago
This is EXPLOSIVE.
This lady is BRILLIANT.
2000tc88 5 months ago
I find it kinda stupid to think that free energy destroyed the WTC. But I guess it's possible?
redsoul888 5 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Jesse Ventura -- Is he forever & a day ... artfully disseminating ... err ... clouding analysis ... always conjuring-up bin Laden bogey-man syndrome: GOLDSTIEN 1984; compounding already FULLY DISCOUNTED (non)linkages to purported Bin Laden crew ... he foists - drills it into gullible goyim, thereby, honoring sworn allegiance -- minion he: inculcation game -- for puppet masters: Jesse Ventura & Ron Paul are one & same op: fancy-pants-down-odd-play-angle NWO cleanup act: Kay Griggs; wondering
CarCriticAssessor 5 months ago
Comment removed
CarCriticAssessor 5 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
FYI, re typical 9 II postings:
TO ALL THE FAMILIES AFFECTED DIRECTLY BY THE ATTACKS, OR BY LOSING SOMEONE IN THE MILITARY, I AM SORRY FOR YOUR LOSS. GOD BLESS.
I WILL NEVER FORGET.
--->
WAIT: What is it that you will never forget: ... that your foregone conclusion is clearly conveyed by your operative adjective ATTACK; rather, it was an EVENT, whose actual factors are fully known, presently, only to those persons (clearly more than one person: that alone can be deemed FACT) whom perpetrated it.
CarCriticAssessor 5 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
FYI: Yahweh -- recorded expressly & graphically -- appeared as a tiny odd looking putty aka cherub, w a facial profile akin to a lamb mated to a goat, & projected a fixed smirk grimace, whose short legs exhibited cloven feet akin to a piglet: of course, too; Ancient Greece: Titan mythology, parents to Zeus & two brothers, 1 of whom, tricked into creation of Kraken ... JEALOUS deities recorded in ancient India periods (predate former two): Visage XENO-TRANSFERENCE; RELIGIOUS books lie; ok
CarCriticAssessor 5 months ago
The towers were vaporized by energy beams.
Oh, thanks Dr.
LLLLLLOOOOOOOLLLLLL.
oogrooq 5 months ago
So, what if the people who support wood are not using there critical thinking skills, what if fluoride, mercury, dumbed down educational system, TV has effected our ability to think clearly, people are paid to obscure the truth, indoctrination has shaped our support rational, and some people are micro chiped? google /videoplay?docid=-558096240694803017
youtube /watch?v=pLYrSfnsqb0
What if the elites have duped even the masonic elect ?
letsgomd 5 months ago
@onefodderunit: couldn't agree more!! Just got dr. Judy wood's book not long ago! U can't argue with her findings the lady knows what she's talkin about!! ;-)
TheJJM80 5 months ago
@TheJJM80
There is so much to learn from the September 11 false flag attack that would have fallen by the way were it not for this very courageous and honorable American scientist, Dr. Judy Wood.
onefodderunit 5 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@letsgomd : u talk utter shit!!!
TheJJM80 5 months ago
wood is 100% gov DISINFORMATION AGENT
Thermite & explosives did it ! AE911Truth d.o.t. org
Barbara aho at: watch.pair d.o.t. com /audio.html
has dissected much of the conspiracy.
It seems primarily the Oligarchy from Great Britain is behind the apocalypse (depopulation by the elite).
Also the world wide secret societies hierarchical structure (much of which are duped) are tools.
AUDIO ( Rik Clay ): the Olympic 2012 conspiracy on Red Ice radio.
youtube d.o.t /watch?v=4-mu-GcCvG8
letsgomd 5 months ago 2
@letsgomd
Hogwash. Richard Gage and Steven Jones are disinfo. Dr. Judy Wood would happily debate either one of those traitors. Guaranteed neither would accept. Thermite creates intensely bright flames and sparks. If the steel in the Twin Towers had to be burnt through with thermite at every floor, they would have lit up like huge sparklers.
The Twin Towers turned to dust in mid air. All of the videos show it. Here's one in High Def, Slow Motion
/watch?v=dueVm1UGvXo&feature
Irrefutable.
onefodderunit 5 months ago
@onefodderunit, Its one or the other... Either Judy Wood is the disinfo agent, or Richard Gage, Steven Jones and over 1,500 Architects and Engineers who have signed on to his campaign.
Nanothermite explosives can turn buildings to dust in mid-air too. You don't need some ridiculous and unproven undocumented scientific phenomenon to explain that.
Gage and Jones won't debate Judy Wood because it would be a ridiculous waste of time. Judy Wood is pure CoIntelPro, everyone with a brain knows it.
DavidAtleePhilips 5 months ago
@DavidAtleePhilips
Your need for dishonesty is self defeating.
Yes, Architects & Engineers has 1500 members who don't believe that fire & gravity could have turned the WTC into dust in mid air.
Your lie: "Nanothermite explosives can turn buildings to dust in mid-air too"
Thermite or "nano-thermite" is an incendiary, not an explosive. Thermite would have had to burn through
2" thick steel walls of 47 box columns at every floor.
Post an example of "nano-thermite" burning any material to dust.
onefodderunit 5 months ago
@onefodderunit,
Nanothermite is an explosive in addition to being an incendiary. Google US Patent 5532449 and read the description.
Your lie: "Thermite would have to burn through [sic] every floor"
Why every floor? Why not every other floor? Why not just the floors we see explosions on which also happen to be the exact same floors which received fire-proofing upgrades in the 3 years before 9/11, where suspicious CIA connected companies worked.
DavidAtleePhilips 5 months ago
@DavidAtleePhilips
Are you The David Atlee Philips, 'ex' CIA, or a pretender?
You advised "Google US Patent . . . "
From the patent "generating a plasma arc from the plasma torch of a plasma arc generator, mixing thermite powder with a supply gas for the plasma torch, "
Where does it say that plasma is an explosive, as you have claimed?
Are you suggesting plasma torches and nano thermite were used to turn the Twin Towers to dust in mid air, or only nano-thermite?
onefodderunit 5 months ago
@DavidAtleePhilips wrote: "Nanothermite is an explosive . . . "
Excuse me. You didn't claim that plasma is an explosive. That was a typing error on my part.
The patent which you cited does not say that nano thermite is an explosive. Nano thermite is not an explosive and was not the energy which transformed the Twin Towers to dust.
onefodderunit 5 months ago
@onefodderunit, The patent I cited shows how nanothermite can be used to demolish concrete at a high efficiency. I agree it uses another gas mixed with thermite and that this creates a plasma arc. The only scientific point I need to prove is that nanothermite technology could be used to create the phenomena observed on 9/11.
Now it's your turn to prove that your direct energy weapons could have done the same thing. Then make a testable prediction. That's how REAL science works.
DavidAtleePhilips 5 months ago
@DavidAtleePhilips
You are demonstrating how you thermite pushers need to lie for the for mass murderers you serve.
onefodderunit 5 months ago
@DavidAtleePhilips Another lie of yours: "unproven undocumented scientific phenomenon to explain that."
Unclassified DEW weapons in the form of High-Energy Radio-Frequency (HERF) are operational in the US and in the Izzie military.
>> Raytheon's experimentation with directed energy weapons began when its research labs' experiments had inadvertently produced the first microwave oven in 1958. -
They've been developing these weapons for over 50 years.
Dr. Judy Wood would humiliate Richard Gage.
onefodderunit 5 months ago
@onefodderunit, Show me an example of these weapons vaporizing steel, separating out the manganese and carbon from the alloy, then oxidizing the leftover iron and solidifying it in a nanoscale matrix similar to the nanothermites discovered in the WTC dust.
I'll be waiting for you to give me an example.
Judy Wood humiliates herself every time she speaks. She is the most unscientific spoken person with a Ph.D. in science that I have ever heard.
DavidAtleePhilips 5 months ago
@DavidAtleePhilips
You were asked first. Where's an example of nano thermite turning any material to dust?
Please correct my grammar, since you have an issue: Thermite would have to burn through 2" thick steel walls of 47 box columns at every floor. Do you see a pancake demo of every floor, every other floor, or no pancaking at all?
onefodderunit 5 months ago
@onefodderunit, uhm... That would be right where it says "an apparatus which can demolish a concrete structure at a high efficiency while preventing a secondary problem due to noise, flying dust and chips, and the like." ... which is right before it says "mixing thermite powder with a supply gas for the plasma torch, passing the mixture of thermite powder and supply gas to the plasma arc, directing the plasma arc at the surface of the concrete structure."
Pancake Theory was debunked years ago.
DavidAtleePhilips 5 months ago
@DavidAtleePhilips
No, it's not my turn. Can you admit that you can't find a single example of thermite, or nano thermite turning any type of material into dust, Yes, or No?
Be clear. Are you reversing your previous claim that nano thermite alone is an explosive, Yes, or no?
You knew the patent which you've cited does not make the claim that nano thermite alone is an explosive, didn't you?
Thermite flames emit UV light and will give your eyes welder's burn.
Where is the light in the videos?
onefodderunit 5 months ago
@onefodderunit, Can you admit that you can't find a single example of DEW turning any material into dust? Why do you have double standards with strong bias towards your own hypothesis? Is this how science is done? No REAL science does experiments and publishes papers for peer review. Check Bentham Open for the nanothermite paper and let me know when Judy Wood publishes something substantial on her Hutchison Effect.
UV light is invisible... Are you retarded or something?
DavidAtleePhilips 5 months ago
@D
UV light will damage your eyes and exemplifies the brightness of thermite flames. Why isn't a thermite flame visible in a video of the Towers turning to dust?
No, you can't find a single example of thermite, or nano thermite turning any type of material into dust, because nano thermite is an incendiary, not an explosive, which you lied about.
You lie for the mass murderers.
Evidence is not hypothesis. Do you deny the evidence of all videos showing the Twin Towers turning to dust in mid air?
onefodderunit 5 months ago
@onefodderunit, Even regular thermite can pulverize concrete... Wait a while and I will show you the experiments to prove it! Nanoscale reagents simply increase the surface area and therefor reaction rate, turning incendiaries into explosives. I didn't lie about anything you retard. Evidence is not hypothesis but you obviously don't understand the difference because Judy Wood gives BOTH, but like an unscientific unskeptical sheep you follow what she says without question. Easily mislead.
DavidAtleePhilips 4 months ago
@DavidAtleePhilips
Thermite or 'nan-thermite' is an incendiary, not an explosive. It generates a lot of sparks and flames so intense they will give your eyes welder's burns. The flames emit ultra violet light, they are so intense.
There is no evidence of thermite flames or sparks in this youtube video:
High Def, Slow Mo Clip of WTC Turning to Dust
/watch?v=dueVm1UGvXo
onefodderunit 4 months ago
See: Dimitri Khalezov.
TheJbach 5 months ago
What I don’t understand is how a massive conspiracy such as 9-11, which would have required literally hundreds of insiders to plan and execute, could happen and no one comes forth with the truth in the past decade. A vast number of people would have been required to complete such a broad ranged project. Included in the conspirators would be political, military, law enforcement, CIA, FBI and media. To hold such tight reign of information control, with such a broad ranged conspiracy is suspect.
romanmel1 5 months ago
@romanmel1 ummm...people come out all the time..You ignore them.
dueycrim 5 months ago
@dueycrim Your assumption is pure bunk. I am aware some people say they think maybe someone should investigate further. Sorry, that doesn't count as "comming out". What I want is someone INVOLVED in the conspiracy who has the courage to tell all they know. I am not saying that there cannot be a conspiracy. For instance. who killed all those passengers who were on the airplanes that were diverted so the remote controlled planes collided with their targets?
romanmel1 5 months ago
During 9/11 Un-Reported HURRICANE ERIN stood Still 90 miles away, then after the TOWERS disintegrated Hurricane ERIN turned Right and went out to SEA
Some How ERIN was Providing Energy for the WEAPON used on 9/11
deadadelta 5 months ago