The AK-47 and M16 have help eachother evolve further trough the years
M16 has 30round magazines becuase thats what the AK uses,M16 have a bit loser desing because thats why the AK-47 is so reliable(M16/M4/AR-15 can also take a bit of abuse but no as mush as the AK,AKs canbe buried for year and run over with tanks but they will still work)AK developed muzzle breaks and later the AK74 in 5.45x39
I do not understand the ridiculous and stubborn American pride. Nobody says that the M16 is bad, in fact is ok and is a very good gun, but what all the whole world repeat is that the AK47 is much better. It is so hard to accept? hahahah xD
The AK can practically shoot no matter HOW you treat it (well, let's stay REALISTIC now shall we?). Things such as sand, water, mud, and even getting run over by a Humvee (NOT tank) won't affect it's capability of shooting. It may lose accuracy, but it still shoots.
@BMW9871 They haven't made a rifle yet that is completely impervious to sand and mud. The AK,however, is more tolerant to sand and mud then other rifles though.
u guys are wrong for 1 reason. power vs accuracy in guns. accuracy wins. both will kill you with one shot place in the right place. and its better to be accurate because u wont have much recoil and u will have a greater chance of hitting ur target. the only thing better about the ak 47 is that it is cheap and extremely reliable. RELIABLE IS THE BEST THING ABOUT IT
@noelmejia19 no ofense dude but this aint Call of Duty, it's REAL LIFE. And besides their both bullet weapons so either way they're gonna kill YOU for sure.
@TheChauChannel i kno its not i shoot guns including both of these. recoil isnt fake and both guns will kill u with a shot and the ak will shot almost always through any thing making it reliable u can be underwater and it would probaly shoot
@noelmejia19 why you think one bullet will do the job? 5,56 doesnt necessary take a guy down but 7,62 will surely break bones eaven if you have class 3 bulletproof on
Common sense m16 designed for control and accuracy 5.56 can reach 1000 yards with fine accurate groups with the 7.62 the farthest I've heard of was 700 yds with consistant grouping. at those ranges velocity and penetration is reduced dramatically giving the higher velocity projetile the cutting edge. both great rifles personaly I would take the rifle that would save my life.
@MrDip02 I know its not COD. Since when in COD were you able to smack a guy across the head with a magazine and load it in. And what part of the M16 that I said is inaccurate? U.S soldiers attach scopes, including sniper scopes, to take out insurgents from long distance. Last time I checked, soldiers prefer scopes over iron sights in the battlefield
@crossvariation the way you said and yes .223 is good for hunting (i know it's 5.56x45 but very similar calibers and people love .223) but define long rang
@MrDip02 Long range-- I don't have any numbers since its a broad term. But according to all the articles I read, "several hundred meters". I'm not a soldier so I wouldn't know how to represent that with real life examples.
and anyone who says it's not powerful enough, let's shoot you with a 5.56 and you let me know how that works out. (y)
oh, and i've personally seen people put a nice solid hole through a spent .50 bmg at 100 yards using an AK-47, so both rifles are fairly accurate, and powerful, just one is more tolerable, and easy to use, and the other is more accurate over better range, but less tolerable, more complexly constructed, and MUCH easier to sight a target
@INKOFORANGE An airgun can kill you, but nobody carries them into battle. I wouldn't want to be hit by any caliber. It's not a question of being able to kill, it's a question of how reliably they can kill.
@INKOFORANGE Ah, but hititng spent .50 BMG shells consistently with every shot? Cuz even a crappy clock can strike 12 o' clock once a day. I would never refer to the Ak-47 as an "accurate" weapon aside from a rare few variants and the occaisional "luck of the draw" Ak coupled with an extremely good shooter.
the m16 has changed since vietnam greatly. The A4 model is MUCH more reliable than it was 30 or 40 years ago. And what's more, back then a LOT of american troops would discharge whole magazines out of panic, and attempt to tamper with the weapon to reduce the rate of fire...so it's not fair to say the m16 wasn't a good weapon, it's less TOLERABLE than the AK-47, you can't bury it in mud and start shooting, but it's still a good rifle if you respect it.
@ricardomena45 No if you want something powerful, very accurate, low recoil, and reliable then go with the M16. The tumble effect of the 5.56 creates a cavity as large or larger than a 7.62x39. That's why the Russians switched to 5.45x39.
@TheMrkukulcan i dont really care wat ud choose i like them both for different reasons, its just these idiots talkin trash about other countries on a fucking GUN COMPARISON video....
@alexxx759 i love how u Europeans insult the usa. we dont get offened by uneducated like ur self ur countrys evil for making our country watch the royal wedding
@THE13EARJEW A lot of stuff about the 5.56x45 is exaggerated. It can do nasty wounds, but other times it won't.I have a report by an army doctor where he says the 5.56x45 would do wounds similar to that of a .22 LR. It would pass right through the chest of people without any type of tumbling or fragmenting.
@Thejeter5770 It's a terrible documentry all together. I've shot AK's to 200 yards and they do a lot better then that. The guy was a terrible shot or his sight adjustments were off. Plus they kept emphasizing far too much on the M16's reliability problems in Vietnam, rather then judging it by its reliability today.
@SuperMachinegunner i do not know whats pfc stand for cause in my country we only have 1 private rank. CPL stand for corporal, SGT stand for sergeant. I'm pretty sure when you are new to the rank you do not know all this right.
Man, to see Mikhail Kalashnikov and Eugene Stoner, the designers of the two most deadliest rifles sit next to each other!, sends chills up my back. ._.
@sergeikozin47 UR WRONG. Here's y. Power is no difference between these 2 guns. both will kill u when placed in the right spot. the m16 has better accuracy meaning it will hit ur target unlike the ak 47. no point of power if u cant hit ur target. the only thing the ak 47 has is reliability. RELIABILITY IS THE ONLY PERK
Plus, the reenactment looked pathetic. Hardly similar to what it was really like. You'd think with all those Vietnam vets they had there to interview, they'd make a more realistic set. Well, it really doesn't matter.
The NVA and Viet Cong may have used a few Russian or Czechoslovakian AK-47s, but the majority of the variants issued were Chinese Type-56. The 56 may be a copy of the AK, but you never know, it could have maintenance a little differently than the original Soviet model. So technically, this isn't the BEST comparison of the Kalashnikov and the AR's performances.
@Transformers2themax There is no such thing as a " Czechoslovakian AK-47", there is the VZ 58 made by the Czechoslovaks which is a completely different rifle, other then it's an assault rifle and it's in the same caliber. The Type 56 pretty much an identical copy of a Russian AK-47, other then it has hooded front sights and a spike bayonet. I have fired many Chinese AK's and they are quite good quality actually. The one in the accuracy test didn't appear to be Chinese anyways.
@3Runner95SRB So if you had the choice you would rather be shot with the M16 and feel the 5.56 tumble and fragment inside you creating a larger wound than a 7.62x39 and a better chance to hit a major organ or artery?
@bazookajoethethird Read what Dr.Martin Fackler, a military surgeon, said about the M16 round in Vietnam. He said the wounds it produced were very minimal. I can send you the link if you want.
dont know about the accuracy, had absolutely no trouble hitting a man sized target at 400 yards, at this distance locating an enemy soldier in a military uniform is very difficult, shooting at him is stupid, if you miss, he will probably call in artillery, so the ak is accurate enough
@durgymp The one in the video didn't have hooded front sights like a Chinese AK-47. And if it were Chinese, it would still be a good rifle. I've fired lots Chinese AK's and they are quality rifles.
reason the ak didnt hit the paper was because he didnt have it set to 200 metres. it wasnt even 100metres. i love both guns but that was a silly mistake.
It's funny how Americans call the (AUSTRIAN) Glock "plastic junk", yet they love the (AMERICAN) AR-15 despite it having several plastic parts. Pure coincidence? I don't think so.
@Keichwoud357 because the glock is a cheap plastic piece of shit and most of them shoot a small piece of shit round, best pistol of all time, the browning .45, reliable and simple and shoots a good round
@Keichwoud357 no i m saying that the browning is super simple, u give that gun to a five year old and some vague directions and they can take it a part and put it back together easy
@demon07nd You're very ignorant. I suggest you fire a Glock and do more research before running your mouth. I have fired a Glock and while they aren't my favorite pistol, they are very reliable and I would bet my life on them. They aren't a pos. You can get a Glock 21 which fires .45 acp. It's not called a, "Browning .45" It's called a 1911.
@esh325 first of all i have shot glocks, i call it a browning .45, because there are companies that have copied the 1911, and i trust my life to my browning 1911, i have been around many .45s and i have never seen one jam, while i have seen a glock jam
@demon07nd I had a Colt 1911 in 9mm jam really bad on me with regular ammo. I had a Colt WW2 reproduction jam on me with regular ammo. The first 1911 I ever shot was a compact colt or some sort and that jammed with factory ammo. Springfield armory I had choked on some reloads. A WW2 remington rand I had choked on some reloads. Nothing is perfect. My glock hasn't jammed yet, but that doesn't mean it can't.
@Keichwoud357 You obviously have NO idea what you are talking about. Us Americans love the Glocks. EVERY gun fanatic in America loves Glocks! It is just like the M16. American soldiers in Vietnam called the M16 the "toy gun" because it is made with mostly armalite plastics and has few metal pieces. But the M16 caught on and became world renown.
@bazookajoethethird Not true the ak47 is responsible for the deaths of Millions its cheap and reliable, ak47 frames will soon out produced and out perform the m16 frame the m4 was a good gun but it will not be able to out perform the ak47.
@MrGkid5000 I know the AK-47 is the most widely used weapon. But what are you saying is not true? The M4 out performs the AK-47 in CQC, range, and accuracy. The M16 and M4's are reliable weapons, that's a fact. The M16 was not but since the 5.56 has been changed from M193 ball to 5.56 NATO and the barrel has been chromed it is unlikely to jam. However the M4 cannot out perform the RK-95 TP, the best AK-47 variant.
@bazookajoethethird Yes it can. The ak-47 is the only weapon that can compete with the next generation guns, scar/acr/xm8. M16, and the m4 are not fail safe weapons, especially for the U.S where we go to other continents to fight were they have climates that are not designed for these weapons. The 7.56 round has a range of 500yards while the 5.56 has a range of 380 yards. accuracy depends wildly on the shooter, all of it depends on the shooter and our rival armies training.
@MrGkid5000 You don't know anything COD kid. The AK-47 fires a 7.62x39. It has a range of 500 yards. The 5.56 NATO round has a range of 1000 meters. the AK-47's barrel wabbles on every shot and the 7.62x39 is alot less accurate and the rear sight is not close to the user also effecting accuracy. The first M16 would not shoot in cold climates, now they are able to go anywhere and fire without fail. The "tumble" of the 5.56 creates a larger cavity than the 7.62X39=easier kill shot. SEARCH IT!
@bazookajoethethird Yeah a 5.56x45 can fly to 1000 yards, but the majority of people using it are never going to shoot that far. Is your eyesight good enough to see an 1000 yard target with a M16? Let's see you post a video of you hitting an 1000 target with a M16.
@bazookajoethethird you are fucking retarded you just are completely retarded im ashamed to even say i looked at your retarded comment go kill yourself just kill yourself
@MrDip02 What? I am right about everything. Please tell me what the hell you are so mad about you fucking COD kid you don't know anything do your homework before you talk. I can show you how stupid you are if you tell me what I am "wrong" about.
@bazookajoethethird every gun barrel flexes EVERY just some more than others also the 7.62x39 as a bigger and thicker bullet making the damage ten times more and bigger bullets travel farther than smaller bullets especially knowing the 5.56x45 has less of a powder charge and a smaller bullet ALL bullets can achieve the range of 1000 even a .22LR but not effectively the the ak-47 is capable of hitting things at 400 yards yes less accurately but if you are a good shot its easily possible but
but who would shoot an assault rifle at that range and since the ak-47 is 10 times more durable it makes it more superior and it's cheap and if it you need to some reason field strip it the ak-47 is easier and faster light weight does not really matter and if the m-16 was SO much Superior others would not make so many variants of it and knowing the that marines have bullet proof armor the 5.56x45 would not be as painfull to be hit by than the 7.62x39 the 7.62x39 can brake ribs 5.56 cant
@MrDip02 You fucking idiot. You have never heard of ballistics have you? "uhh the 7.62x39 is bigger so it is more powerful." Stupid, look up what the tumble effect is, the 5.56 creates a larger cavity oops you don't know what that means...when you shoot someone with a 5.56 it makes a bigger hole in them than a 7.62x39 PLEASE DO NOT BOTHER ME WITH YOUR IDIOTIC THOUGHTS ABOUT THE 5.56 UNTIL YOU LOOK UP THE FACTS!!! Your on the internet. LOOK IT UP!!!
@bazookajoethethird the 7.62x39 hollow points would create a bigger cavity the 7.62x39 have thicker bullets meant to do more damage as in it could kill someone behind a wall the 5.56 was meant to fragment that's why it makes a bigger cavity and the 7.62 hollow point would do more damage than that but the only problem is since the 5.56 bullets were made for fragments it would not drop someone using bullet proof armor the 7.62x39 will they would survive but like i said it would brake ribs
@MrDip02 You don't know shit. Full Metal Jacket 5.56 NATO easily defeats body armor that's what it was DESIGNED FOR. To go through Soviet helmets at 500 yards. M855 green tips easily go through armor. They gave up stopping power with the lighter XM193 Vietnam era round that would tumble more reliably but didn't have enough penetration or accuracy. A slow 7.62 x 39 will not penetrate common body armor in usage. Go back to COD or shoot a real gun.
@bazookajoethethird im not saying the m-16 is shit it's still good but your facts are fucking stupidly inaccurate and the m-14 is better than the m-16
@MrGkid5000 you must be fucking retarded. first of all what the fuck is the 7.56 round and anyways 5.56 can reach out 1000 yards while the 7.62x39 round can get out to 500 but not really in an ak-47 that most terrorists group use and talking about skill of the shooters a lot of enemies of the united states have less training than american shooters
@TheEskimo21 No the akm frane of the ak-47 which is the most accurate can far surpass 1000 yards. it fires a 7.52 round. And before you randomly jump into a conversation how about you listen to both sides you fucking idiot. We were talking about gun frames, and the bullets they shoot. Are you fucking stupid american rivals such as Korea/Russia/china, they use the ak-47 frame weither it be the RKP or the AKM, and they train from the age of avrg minors.
to Russian: что б там не говорили про ак-47, практика показывает совсем другое. Даже в Ираке американцы бросали свои ультрапродвинутые пушки и брали Калашников. Ак-47 и АК-47М самые продвинутые автоматы в мире, чему доказательсвто любовь и предпочтение всех военных всего мира !!!
Here is my preference. AK: Big Bullet. Lots of Kinetic energy. Drops targets faster. Easy Gun. No jamming. Simple. M16: Low recoil. Different firing modes. Faster shooting.
@weatherallc05 5.56 isnt that much small compared to 7.62 and its also fast more accurate and the m16 has more fire rate. the main reason why ar15 or m16 or whateva beatup the cheap ak is because ak is so unaccurate and so slow rate of fire compared to ar15
i rather have two 5.56 bullets on my enemy and not one 7.62 bullet on the air
Even though they are communist, there is no denial of the effective killing power behind the AK-47, its just unfortunate that they could not do with their economy what they could with their assault rifles. O well, I guess when you take the power from the people and give it to bureaucrats in Moscow then you get problems.
So what you're using as an example of communism is actually not communism? So you really don't know what it is?! Wow. Well let me show you democracy. The Athenians went out to an island known as Melos. The Melosians begged for peace, but Athens made an example of them. The melosians did nothing to the athenians. The athenians killed all the men of age and sold the rest of the people into slavery. It's part of the peloponesian war.
@AnakNangTupa Hm perhaps. I suppose it's easier to argue by defacing one's character rather than by using actual facts. If there is a metaphor there it's about Trotskyism being obviously impractical. That's not true and you have no right to say that. You haven't seen it. You have no proof to support that. In fact if any government is practical it's socialism. Trotsky was murdered by Stalinists. So.
@AnakNangTupa Well it's never been practiced. So. I mean and what you're saying is spoken by a truly fearful man. Distrusting of his fellow man. You've shown to me over this entire argument I can't really argue with you. Can't argue with an ignorant person after all. So I'm going to be the better man. Goodbye Anak.
@StiftikBoliovich weaseled: "Well it's never been practiced" (communism)
You Communists have this common excuse that 'real Communism' has never been tried and true--then demonize those who criticize & oppose it.
What we analytical thinkers & other smart observers previewed so far, on the many attempts to push this horrible ideology are stunningly ugly--millions had already been killed, nations collapsed, just to make it happen.
So, no thanks, let's keep Communism a theory not a reality.
@StiftikBoliovich lectured: "Can't argue with an ignorant person after all. So I'm going to be the better man"
For a guy who is still standing for and defending a failed & seriously flawed ideology (Communism), and then calls those who had seen it for what it is, "ignorant"---is the epitome of a Useful Idiot.
Lenin and Marx would pat you in the head for leading the cause of Useful Idiots.
It's a funny story. Vladimir Ulyanov, the one you know as Lenin, did nothing for the revolution. Trotsky fought the russian revolution. He founded most modern military organizations in russia today. He was the first Kommissar. He was a real Kommissar. He didn't shoot people who retreated. He inspired them. With speeches. He inspired them to fight harder in WWI than any other russian soldiers had. They were deserters. They would've been shot had he not intervened.
The constitution says your government can tax you. Why shouldn't they? I admit the taxes should absolutely be used properly and not embezzled. However it's what makes a strong country. It's why the Union winning the Civil War was a good thing. The Confederates, more along a right wing persons line of thinking, would've set up a confederacy. The country would've been so weak. No ability to tax. People should pay back their society for what it's done for them.
Amendment 16 was an illegal act on the US Constitution by the few powers that be, at that time, that should have been passed by 2/3rds States majority--but, again the liberal left (your Komrades) manipulated it to be included to become law in the amendments, through deception, to be at least the foot at the door to Socialism
@AnakNangTupa Lol my comrades? I don't see the democrats as my comrades. Eh they have saved your country on a few occasions. Big business certainly hasn't done anything for it. Nothing too good anyways. Prosperity isn't worth the cost of human lives. Al Gore is one of the most ridiculous individuals I have ever heard. Although he did win the popular vote in the 2000 election. He lost the electoral. Which is ridiculous. You definitely have some phobia of leftists. As if we cause every problem.
@AnakNangTupa Well you must realize they've never founded a Utopia. Lenin was shot. Marx never even was the leader of a country. The CIA has very effectively put down communism. McCarthyism put it down in the US. Fear mongerers and selfish individuals have put down the revolution. Stalin has influenced many regimes. Which is a sad thing. He was a fascist. Communism would either have to be practiced in a small isolated community or in a worldwide system.
@AnakNangTupa Is it a myth? I believe that the US hasn't allowed room for Utopia to be founded. When the February Revolution occured US troops were deployed to Russia. Why? The Tsars were very oppressive. The communists preached power to the people. The US should've sympathized with that. They've always put down communism. It's taught to be this evil thing. It really isn't. Giving a jobless man a job isn't evil. Perfect equality isn't evil. Utopia doesn't profit the rich.
@AnakNangTupa Eh man lol. You actually think communism has been practiced in this world? On the surface of this planet? No. The children of the soviet and the soviet itself were in fact socialist countries. Money still existed. Money was created so business owners couldn't screw each other. Communism is an internationalist belief. Stalin practiced a nationalistic socialism. Therefore he was actually a Nazi. Thus is so for Fidel and all of Stalin's successors.
@AnakNangTupa Haha. I didn't know you were God? So because you say it will never work it will never work? Someday I'm going to get to throw you a very smug look. And you my friend are going to be eating your words. It has never been practiced. Nor has an actual attempt been made. You've seen a wave of two step method revolutions. Trotskyism holds high the idea of permanent revolution. Two step method requires a short period of dictatorship of the proletariot. That's the failure. The ruse.
@AnakNangTupa Haha you are a funny bastard. I suppose living in the US makes you cynical. You suspect that compassion comes with ulterior motives. I can't speak for those who have taken the name of communism in the past. I know myself as wanting less pay for politicians. The right to bare arms should be allowed. I'll never take that away from people. It shouldn't be taken away. I believe in a government that actually serves its people. You can say all you wish. Men have fought and died for this.
where can i find interview with Stoner and Kalashnikov?
give me a link please
AdminVA1 1 week ago
@BMW971 The AK and M16 had a one night stand and thus came the HK M416. It can take punishment and have the accuracy of the M16.
salvy51 1 week ago
The AK-47 and M16 have help eachother evolve further trough the years
M16 has 30round magazines becuase thats what the AK uses,M16 have a bit loser desing because thats why the AK-47 is so reliable(M16/M4/AR-15 can also take a bit of abuse but no as mush as the AK,AKs canbe buried for year and run over with tanks but they will still work)AK developed muzzle breaks and later the AK74 in 5.45x39
Galil is a AK with a rear M16 peep sight.
There opposite but they help eachothe develop
dasdew2 2 weeks ago
AK, single shot, rifle scope ultimate killing machine
vileloxter62 3 weeks ago
This has been flagged as spam show
I do not understand the ridiculous and stubborn American pride. Nobody says that the M16 is bad, in fact is ok and is a very good gun, but what all the whole world repeat is that the AK47 is much better. It is so hard to accept? hahahah xD
kyoshiroma 4 weeks ago
AK is powerful, fairly accurate if handled well, cheap and reliable.
M16 is somewhat powerful and accurate.
xzxCHIPxzx 1 month ago
ak all the way go russha you can yous the ak with out looking after it >.< m 16 :p
snoop1260 1 month ago
The AK can practically shoot no matter HOW you treat it (well, let's stay REALISTIC now shall we?). Things such as sand, water, mud, and even getting run over by a Humvee (NOT tank) won't affect it's capability of shooting. It may lose accuracy, but it still shoots.
BMW9871 1 month ago
@BMW9871 They haven't made a rifle yet that is completely impervious to sand and mud. The AK,however, is more tolerant to sand and mud then other rifles though.
esh325 1 month ago
u guys are wrong for 1 reason. power vs accuracy in guns. accuracy wins. both will kill you with one shot place in the right place. and its better to be accurate because u wont have much recoil and u will have a greater chance of hitting ur target. the only thing better about the ak 47 is that it is cheap and extremely reliable. RELIABLE IS THE BEST THING ABOUT IT
noelmejia19 1 month ago
@noelmejia19 no ofense dude but this aint Call of Duty, it's REAL LIFE. And besides their both bullet weapons so either way they're gonna kill YOU for sure.
TheChauChannel 1 month ago
@TheChauChannel i kno its not i shoot guns including both of these. recoil isnt fake and both guns will kill u with a shot and the ak will shot almost always through any thing making it reliable u can be underwater and it would probaly shoot
noelmejia19 1 month ago
@noelmejia19 why you think one bullet will do the job? 5,56 doesnt necessary take a guy down but 7,62 will surely break bones eaven if you have class 3 bulletproof on
Lapinmiez 1 month ago
Swap the calibers and see which one is throwing itself around. Besides one is an automatic rifle and one is a pistol.
EngineeringFun 1 month ago
Common sense m16 designed for control and accuracy 5.56 can reach 1000 yards with fine accurate groups with the 7.62 the farthest I've heard of was 700 yds with consistant grouping. at those ranges velocity and penetration is reduced dramatically giving the higher velocity projetile the cutting edge. both great rifles personaly I would take the rifle that would save my life.
mazdaturbo7 2 months ago
Accuracy test notice windage adj on ak
mazdaturbo7 2 months ago
AK47 - Unleash 30 rounds with a swamp. Smack someone's head across the head with a spare mag and load that mag in and unleash another 30 rounds.
M16- Pick people off quickly from a distance with a sniper scope attachment.
crossvariation 2 months ago
@crossvariation this is not COD
MrDip02 1 month ago
@MrDip02 I know its not COD. Since when in COD were you able to smack a guy across the head with a magazine and load it in. And what part of the M16 that I said is inaccurate? U.S soldiers attach scopes, including sniper scopes, to take out insurgents from long distance. Last time I checked, soldiers prefer scopes over iron sights in the battlefield
crossvariation 1 month ago
@crossvariation the way you said and yes .223 is good for hunting (i know it's 5.56x45 but very similar calibers and people love .223) but define long rang
MrDip02 1 month ago
@MrDip02 Long range-- I don't have any numbers since its a broad term. But according to all the articles I read, "several hundred meters". I'm not a soldier so I wouldn't know how to represent that with real life examples.
crossvariation 1 month ago
ive never shot an m16, ar15, or m4 but i shot the ak a few times and i really like it, its easy to strip and clean and shoot too
desertboy7212 2 months ago
i vote ak-47. cus i love it
dodlaisdodla 2 months ago
and anyone who says it's not powerful enough, let's shoot you with a 5.56 and you let me know how that works out. (y)
oh, and i've personally seen people put a nice solid hole through a spent .50 bmg at 100 yards using an AK-47, so both rifles are fairly accurate, and powerful, just one is more tolerable, and easy to use, and the other is more accurate over better range, but less tolerable, more complexly constructed, and MUCH easier to sight a target
INKOFORANGE 2 months ago 4
@INKOFORANGE An airgun can kill you, but nobody carries them into battle. I wouldn't want to be hit by any caliber. It's not a question of being able to kill, it's a question of how reliably they can kill.
esh325 2 months ago
@INKOFORANGE Ah, but hititng spent .50 BMG shells consistently with every shot? Cuz even a crappy clock can strike 12 o' clock once a day. I would never refer to the Ak-47 as an "accurate" weapon aside from a rare few variants and the occaisional "luck of the draw" Ak coupled with an extremely good shooter.
wigon 2 months ago
the m16 has changed since vietnam greatly. The A4 model is MUCH more reliable than it was 30 or 40 years ago. And what's more, back then a LOT of american troops would discharge whole magazines out of panic, and attempt to tamper with the weapon to reduce the rate of fire...so it's not fair to say the m16 wasn't a good weapon, it's less TOLERABLE than the AK-47, you can't bury it in mud and start shooting, but it's still a good rifle if you respect it.
Only a poor workman blames his tools
INKOFORANGE 2 months ago
in russia whe buy 2 ak-47 instead of one m16 for the same price.
thats how to make every russian happy.
and as always have a nice day.
ghostleycaspey 2 months ago
The AK47 is reliable and powerful, but the M16 is more accurate. I prefer the AK47.
Ludoisdaman 3 months ago
Or you get the AR in a different caliber, such as the 6.8 SPC. Accuracy and range of the AR, while hitting much harder than the 5.56.
nickma71 3 months ago
his last lame is stoner hahahahahaha nice
luv3z2p00p 3 months ago
The "Standard Rifle Bullet" is a 7.62x54mmR right?
Keichwoud357 3 months ago
if u want something powerful then go with an ak47
if u want something that is accurate go with the m16
i tell u the truth both guns are good in there own ways
ricardomena45 3 months ago 12
@ricardomena45 what do you think of the l85a2
biggeridiotthanu 1 month ago
@ricardomena45 No if you want something powerful, very accurate, low recoil, and reliable then go with the M16. The tumble effect of the 5.56 creates a cavity as large or larger than a 7.62x39. That's why the Russians switched to 5.45x39.
bazookajoethethird 1 month ago
AK-47 IS THE BEST GUN IN THE FUKING WORLD...FUCK CAPITALISM AND FACK YOUR GAY AMERICA!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
alexxx759 4 months ago
@alexxx759 cause ur country is probably just soooooo much better....lmao..
beefcakes42 3 months ago
@beefcakes42 is better haa why there are to much homelees then hah
TheMrkukulcan 3 months ago in playlist m16
Comment removed
beefcakes42 3 months ago
@beefcakes42 DID YOU GOT WHAT I MEAN HAHAHAHHAHAH
TheMrkukulcan 3 months ago
lol idk what ur talking about
beefcakes42 3 months ago
@beefcakes42 just let it go brother i will choose an ak47
TheMrkukulcan 3 months ago
@TheMrkukulcan i dont really care wat ud choose i like them both for different reasons, its just these idiots talkin trash about other countries on a fucking GUN COMPARISON video....
beefcakes42 3 months ago
@alexxx759 i love how u Europeans insult the usa. we dont get offened by uneducated like ur self ur countrys evil for making our country watch the royal wedding
iceberg931 3 months ago
any AK any day!!!
MrJugoG4life 4 months ago
I like both, but in combat I'd like the M16/M4. Accuracy, and stopping power. Don't hate on the round, it'll tear you apart on the inside.
THE13EARJEW 4 months ago
@THE13EARJEW A lot of stuff about the 5.56x45 is exaggerated. It can do nasty wounds, but other times it won't.I have a report by an army doctor where he says the 5.56x45 would do wounds similar to that of a .22 LR. It would pass right through the chest of people without any type of tumbling or fragmenting.
esh325 4 months ago
Comment removed
Dwnshifter 4 months ago
AK SUCKS
domthebomhammer 4 months ago
I love how they didn't do a test on reliability. That would make the M16 look like shit.
Thejeter5770 4 months ago
@Thejeter5770 It's a terrible documentry all together. I've shot AK's to 200 yards and they do a lot better then that. The guy was a terrible shot or his sight adjustments were off. Plus they kept emphasizing far too much on the M16's reliability problems in Vietnam, rather then judging it by its reliability today.
esh325 4 months ago in playlist ak47 vs m16
Whats LT stand for ?
ranger0504 4 months ago
@ranger0504 you call yourself "ranger" but dont know what LT stands for ?
SuperMachinegunner 4 months ago
@SuperMachinegunner obviously, when you are young you have never seen power "ranger".
ranger0504 4 months ago
@ranger0504 i used to watch power ranger, but even they knew what LT stands for do you at least now what PFC CPL or SGT stands for ?
SuperMachinegunner 4 months ago
@SuperMachinegunner i do not know whats pfc stand for cause in my country we only have 1 private rank. CPL stand for corporal, SGT stand for sergeant. I'm pretty sure when you are new to the rank you do not know all this right.
ranger0504 4 months ago
@ranger0504 when youre watching videos about military weapons you should know ranks, what country you from ?
SuperMachinegunner 4 months ago
@SuperMachinegunner singapore.....
ranger0504 4 months ago
@ranger0504 another country i havnt been to yet, i think i should travel more
SuperMachinegunner 4 months ago
@ranger0504 LT is lieutanent
Acekiller29 4 months ago
Man, to see Mikhail Kalashnikov and Eugene Stoner, the designers of the two most deadliest rifles sit next to each other!, sends chills up my back. ._.
WarriorDragon567 4 months ago
Aye i met with some RAF Intel guys at the Waddington airshow, he tells me with the AK, you could with controlled fire hit targets at 400m pretty good
MRWALKER500000 4 months ago
WAW cutscene...but yes this is something totally different called...REAL LIFE
SWI0001 4 months ago
I love both these guns in real life and in cod
ShadedVirus 5 months ago
If you want to conquer and invade M16
If you want to defend and protect Ak 47
look at whos using each weapon...
elrockerchido 5 months ago
I think the m16 is better!!
SKUALOP 5 months ago
fuck that im sticking with my mosin nagant :P
MrDip02 5 months ago
it depends on a soldier who shoots, both weapons are good....
sergeikozin47 5 months ago 15
@sergeikozin47 UR WRONG. Here's y. Power is no difference between these 2 guns. both will kill u when placed in the right spot. the m16 has better accuracy meaning it will hit ur target unlike the ak 47. no point of power if u cant hit ur target. the only thing the ak 47 has is reliability. RELIABILITY IS THE ONLY PERK
noelmejia19 1 month ago
@noelmejia19 say what you wanna say...
sergeikozin47 1 month ago
Whats the fat guys name
JoseppiTV 5 months ago
@JoseppiTV Eric Cartmen
DEADZOMBIE118 5 months ago
Plus, the reenactment looked pathetic. Hardly similar to what it was really like. You'd think with all those Vietnam vets they had there to interview, they'd make a more realistic set. Well, it really doesn't matter.
Transformers2themax 5 months ago
The NVA and Viet Cong may have used a few Russian or Czechoslovakian AK-47s, but the majority of the variants issued were Chinese Type-56. The 56 may be a copy of the AK, but you never know, it could have maintenance a little differently than the original Soviet model. So technically, this isn't the BEST comparison of the Kalashnikov and the AR's performances.
Transformers2themax 5 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@Transformers2themax There is no such thing as a " Czechoslovakian AK-47", there is the VZ 58 made by the Czechoslovaks which is a completely different rifle, other then it's an assault rifle and it's in the same caliber. The Type 56 pretty much an identical copy of a Russian AK-47, other then it has hooded front sights and a spike bayonet. I have fired many Chinese AK's and they are quite good quality actually. The one in the accuracy test didn't appear to be Chinese anyways.
esh325 5 months ago
Im sticken to the THOMPSON and the PPSH-41
funnycatzz123 5 months ago
i preffer the m16
Drdeathmaster12 5 months ago
AK47 is better
3Runner95SRB 5 months ago
@3Runner95SRB So if you had the choice you would rather be shot with the M16 and feel the 5.56 tumble and fragment inside you creating a larger wound than a 7.62x39 and a better chance to hit a major organ or artery?
bazookajoethethird 5 months ago
@bazookajoethethird Read what Dr.Martin Fackler, a military surgeon, said about the M16 round in Vietnam. He said the wounds it produced were very minimal. I can send you the link if you want.
esh325 5 months ago
@esh325 I don't mind being proved wrong but according to every other source it has excellent killing capability. Send me the link.
bazookajoethethird 5 months ago
Comment removed
joshkkv 6 months ago
Comment removed
fontanaman13 6 months ago
AR ROCKS!!!
MrUtubegunner 6 months ago
dont know about the accuracy, had absolutely no trouble hitting a man sized target at 400 yards, at this distance locating an enemy soldier in a military uniform is very difficult, shooting at him is stupid, if you miss, he will probably call in artillery, so the ak is accurate enough
georgewashington92 6 months ago
To bad they compare the m16 with some cheapass Chinese Type trololol AK47...
durgymp 6 months ago
@durgymp The one in the video didn't have hooded front sights like a Chinese AK-47. And if it were Chinese, it would still be a good rifle. I've fired lots Chinese AK's and they are quality rifles.
esh325 6 months ago
reason the ak didnt hit the paper was because he didnt have it set to 200 metres. it wasnt even 100metres. i love both guns but that was a silly mistake.
joshkkv 6 months ago
@joshkkv Yes, it is really a retarded mistake for a supposed "expert" or it was intentionally done.
esh325 6 months ago
@esh325 id say intentionally.
joshkkv 6 months ago
i hate when i come on a video and all the comments i see are replys
ermaslv44 6 months ago 13
This has been flagged as spam show
Zapraszam na Jastrzebski Serwer : ( Nazwa): Cs-Series Jastrzebie (IP):213.189.52.63:27309 Serwer (4FuN) STEAM / NONSTEAM NIE MA CZITEROW !
19TiMi62 6 months ago in playlist m16
It's funny how Americans call the (AUSTRIAN) Glock "plastic junk", yet they love the (AMERICAN) AR-15 despite it having several plastic parts. Pure coincidence? I don't think so.
Keichwoud357 6 months ago
Comment removed
esh325 6 months ago
@Keichwoud357 because the glock is a cheap plastic piece of shit and most of them shoot a small piece of shit round, best pistol of all time, the browning .45, reliable and simple and shoots a good round
demon07nd 6 months ago
@demon07nd Are you saying that the Glock is not simple?
Keichwoud357 6 months ago
@Keichwoud357 no i m saying that the browning is super simple, u give that gun to a five year old and some vague directions and they can take it a part and put it back together easy
demon07nd 6 months ago
@demon07nd You're very ignorant. I suggest you fire a Glock and do more research before running your mouth. I have fired a Glock and while they aren't my favorite pistol, they are very reliable and I would bet my life on them. They aren't a pos. You can get a Glock 21 which fires .45 acp. It's not called a, "Browning .45" It's called a 1911.
esh325 6 months ago
@esh325 first of all i have shot glocks, i call it a browning .45, because there are companies that have copied the 1911, and i trust my life to my browning 1911, i have been around many .45s and i have never seen one jam, while i have seen a glock jam
demon07nd 6 months ago
@demon07nd I've had plenty of 1911's malfunction on me. Every gun can jam. I have two Glocks a 26 and 21 and they have yet to jam.
esh325 6 months ago
@esh325 well first when was the 1911 made, and what company made it, i have had plenty of glocks jam on me and never a .45
demon07nd 6 months ago
@demon07nd I had a Colt 1911 in 9mm jam really bad on me with regular ammo. I had a Colt WW2 reproduction jam on me with regular ammo. The first 1911 I ever shot was a compact colt or some sort and that jammed with factory ammo. Springfield armory I had choked on some reloads. A WW2 remington rand I had choked on some reloads. Nothing is perfect. My glock hasn't jammed yet, but that doesn't mean it can't.
esh325 6 months ago
@esh325 well did y clean them? you have to clean them once in a while, i have never had one jam case closed
demon07nd 6 months ago
@demon07nd I cleaned and lubed most of them regularly.
esh325 6 months ago
@esh325 ok i have never had one jam me, i just like the 1911 a lot better then all most all other pistols,
demon07nd 6 months ago
@Keichwoud357 You obviously have NO idea what you are talking about. Us Americans love the Glocks. EVERY gun fanatic in America loves Glocks! It is just like the M16. American soldiers in Vietnam called the M16 the "toy gun" because it is made with mostly armalite plastics and has few metal pieces. But the M16 caught on and became world renown.
bazookajoethethird 5 months ago
@bazookajoethethird Not true the ak47 is responsible for the deaths of Millions its cheap and reliable, ak47 frames will soon out produced and out perform the m16 frame the m4 was a good gun but it will not be able to out perform the ak47.
MrGkid5000 5 months ago
@MrGkid5000 I know the AK-47 is the most widely used weapon. But what are you saying is not true? The M4 out performs the AK-47 in CQC, range, and accuracy. The M16 and M4's are reliable weapons, that's a fact. The M16 was not but since the 5.56 has been changed from M193 ball to 5.56 NATO and the barrel has been chromed it is unlikely to jam. However the M4 cannot out perform the RK-95 TP, the best AK-47 variant.
bazookajoethethird 5 months ago
@bazookajoethethird Yes it can. The ak-47 is the only weapon that can compete with the next generation guns, scar/acr/xm8. M16, and the m4 are not fail safe weapons, especially for the U.S where we go to other continents to fight were they have climates that are not designed for these weapons. The 7.56 round has a range of 500yards while the 5.56 has a range of 380 yards. accuracy depends wildly on the shooter, all of it depends on the shooter and our rival armies training.
MrGkid5000 5 months ago
@MrGkid5000 You don't know anything COD kid. The AK-47 fires a 7.62x39. It has a range of 500 yards. The 5.56 NATO round has a range of 1000 meters. the AK-47's barrel wabbles on every shot and the 7.62x39 is alot less accurate and the rear sight is not close to the user also effecting accuracy. The first M16 would not shoot in cold climates, now they are able to go anywhere and fire without fail. The "tumble" of the 5.56 creates a larger cavity than the 7.62X39=easier kill shot. SEARCH IT!
bazookajoethethird 5 months ago
@bazookajoethethird Yeah a 5.56x45 can fly to 1000 yards, but the majority of people using it are never going to shoot that far. Is your eyesight good enough to see an 1000 yard target with a M16? Let's see you post a video of you hitting an 1000 target with a M16.
esh325 5 months ago
@esh325 OF COURSE NOBODY SHOOTS THAT FAR. I'm just stating the facts.
bazookajoethethird 5 months ago
@bazookajoethethird you are fucking retarded you just are completely retarded im ashamed to even say i looked at your retarded comment go kill yourself just kill yourself
MrDip02 5 months ago
@MrDip02 What? I am right about everything. Please tell me what the hell you are so mad about you fucking COD kid you don't know anything do your homework before you talk. I can show you how stupid you are if you tell me what I am "wrong" about.
bazookajoethethird 5 months ago
@bazookajoethethird everything you're fact are just horribly retarded and inaccurate
MrDip02 5 months ago
@bazookajoethethird every gun barrel flexes EVERY just some more than others also the 7.62x39 as a bigger and thicker bullet making the damage ten times more and bigger bullets travel farther than smaller bullets especially knowing the 5.56x45 has less of a powder charge and a smaller bullet ALL bullets can achieve the range of 1000 even a .22LR but not effectively the the ak-47 is capable of hitting things at 400 yards yes less accurately but if you are a good shot its easily possible but
MrDip02 5 months ago
but who would shoot an assault rifle at that range and since the ak-47 is 10 times more durable it makes it more superior and it's cheap and if it you need to some reason field strip it the ak-47 is easier and faster light weight does not really matter and if the m-16 was SO much Superior others would not make so many variants of it and knowing the that marines have bullet proof armor the 5.56x45 would not be as painfull to be hit by than the 7.62x39 the 7.62x39 can brake ribs 5.56 cant
MrDip02 5 months ago
@MrDip02 You fucking idiot. You have never heard of ballistics have you? "uhh the 7.62x39 is bigger so it is more powerful." Stupid, look up what the tumble effect is, the 5.56 creates a larger cavity oops you don't know what that means...when you shoot someone with a 5.56 it makes a bigger hole in them than a 7.62x39 PLEASE DO NOT BOTHER ME WITH YOUR IDIOTIC THOUGHTS ABOUT THE 5.56 UNTIL YOU LOOK UP THE FACTS!!! Your on the internet. LOOK IT UP!!!
bazookajoethethird 5 months ago
@bazookajoethethird the 7.62x39 hollow points would create a bigger cavity the 7.62x39 have thicker bullets meant to do more damage as in it could kill someone behind a wall the 5.56 was meant to fragment that's why it makes a bigger cavity and the 7.62 hollow point would do more damage than that but the only problem is since the 5.56 bullets were made for fragments it would not drop someone using bullet proof armor the 7.62x39 will they would survive but like i said it would brake ribs
MrDip02 5 months ago
@MrDip02 Ok an easy way to end this, the cavity from the 5.56 and 7.62x39 are about the same size...
bazookajoethethird 5 months ago
@bazookajoethethird hahah fine it's the same if the 7.62 is a hollow point
MrDip02 5 months ago
@MrDip02 You don't know shit. Full Metal Jacket 5.56 NATO easily defeats body armor that's what it was DESIGNED FOR. To go through Soviet helmets at 500 yards. M855 green tips easily go through armor. They gave up stopping power with the lighter XM193 Vietnam era round that would tumble more reliably but didn't have enough penetration or accuracy. A slow 7.62 x 39 will not penetrate common body armor in usage. Go back to COD or shoot a real gun.
THEKINGOFMETROPOLIS 3 months ago
@THEKINGOFMETROPOLIS i own guns retard -__-
MrDip02 3 months ago
Comment removed
esh325 5 months ago
and the 5.56 was meant to cleanly fire through enemies the 7.62 was meant to blow massive holes into enemies
MrDip02 5 months ago
@bazookajoethethird im not saying the m-16 is shit it's still good but your facts are fucking stupidly inaccurate and the m-14 is better than the m-16
MrDip02 5 months ago
@MrGkid5000 you must be fucking retarded. first of all what the fuck is the 7.56 round and anyways 5.56 can reach out 1000 yards while the 7.62x39 round can get out to 500 but not really in an ak-47 that most terrorists group use and talking about skill of the shooters a lot of enemies of the united states have less training than american shooters
TheEskimo21 5 months ago
@TheEskimo21 No the akm frane of the ak-47 which is the most accurate can far surpass 1000 yards. it fires a 7.52 round. And before you randomly jump into a conversation how about you listen to both sides you fucking idiot. We were talking about gun frames, and the bullets they shoot. Are you fucking stupid american rivals such as Korea/Russia/china, they use the ak-47 frame weither it be the RKP or the AKM, and they train from the age of avrg minors.
MrGkid5000 5 months ago
@bazookajoethethird well i guess it matters what bullet you use for the 5.56
MrDip02 5 months ago
@bazookajoethethird but you're right about most just not the whole ak-47s part i guess
MrDip02 5 months ago
I prefer M16...hehehe
paulosemifusa 6 months ago
to Russian: что б там не говорили про ак-47, практика показывает совсем другое. Даже в Ираке американцы бросали свои ультрапродвинутые пушки и брали Калашников. Ак-47 и АК-47М самые продвинутые автоматы в мире, чему доказательсвто любовь и предпочтение всех военных всего мира !!!
Dmitriy3434 7 months ago
Comment removed
DinoHunter2 7 months ago
Here is my preference. AK: Big Bullet. Lots of Kinetic energy. Drops targets faster. Easy Gun. No jamming. Simple. M16: Low recoil. Different firing modes. Faster shooting.
Solution: AK+M16= AKM-63
Biker95Fly 7 months ago
the m16 is a bad joke look wise, the ak47 is an absolute tank
weatherallc05 7 months ago
@weatherallc05 5.56 isnt that much small compared to 7.62 and its also fast more accurate and the m16 has more fire rate. the main reason why ar15 or m16 or whateva beatup the cheap ak is because ak is so unaccurate and so slow rate of fire compared to ar15
i rather have two 5.56 bullets on my enemy and not one 7.62 bullet on the air
EranFuchsDesigns 7 months ago
@weatherallc05 sure if you want to miss me about 15 times and me shotting you about 27 times then yeah go ak
crypto727 7 months ago
btw guys dont comment on this video if u bring any game reference in. seriously dont, it pisses people off
weatherallc05 7 months ago
@weatherallc05 Ak47 is better than M16 on CoD because its fully automatic!
smanks12 7 months ago
@smanks12 fair dos
weatherallc05 7 months ago
@smanks12 Yeah i agree but the ak47 shoots like a fn fal on semi but a m16 has 3 round burst on semi m16 is the best assult rifle
DJ182100 6 months ago
Even though they are communist, there is no denial of the effective killing power behind the AK-47, its just unfortunate that they could not do with their economy what they could with their assault rifles. O well, I guess when you take the power from the people and give it to bureaucrats in Moscow then you get problems.
davedavedaveannoy1 7 months ago
8:00 he starts using his friend for cover. O_O
Bingbling16 7 months ago
@Bingbling16 why not?
TehBloodyYank556 7 months ago
ак 47 рулит м16 гавно
makas461 7 months ago
I have business to tend to. I'll continue this tomorrow.
StiftikBoliovich 8 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@StiftikBoliovich excused: "I have business to tend to. I'll continue this tomorrow."
So, you must be a capitalist pig!
AnakNangTupa 8 months ago
So what you're using as an example of communism is actually not communism? So you really don't know what it is?! Wow. Well let me show you democracy. The Athenians went out to an island known as Melos. The Melosians begged for peace, but Athens made an example of them. The melosians did nothing to the athenians. The athenians killed all the men of age and sold the rest of the people into slavery. It's part of the peloponesian war.
StiftikBoliovich 8 months ago
You're spinning history to support your capitalist beliefs. = )
StiftikBoliovich 8 months ago
@StiftikBoliovich
I think your Trotskyite psychological makeup is doing the reverse--but more transparent and going against common sense
AnakNangTupa 8 months ago
@AnakNangTupa Show me an example. What is going against common sense? How am I doing the reverse? Explain it to me. I'll listen.
StiftikBoliovich 8 months ago
@StiftikBoliovich
You didn't get the metaphor? that's you're problem.
AnakNangTupa 8 months ago
@AnakNangTupa What metaphor is that? I see no metaphor.
StiftikBoliovich 8 months ago
@StiftikBoliovich
You beginning to sound like Lucy Arnaz--always confused.
You'll figure it out--in no time.
AnakNangTupa 8 months ago
@AnakNangTupa Hm perhaps. I suppose it's easier to argue by defacing one's character rather than by using actual facts. If there is a metaphor there it's about Trotskyism being obviously impractical. That's not true and you have no right to say that. You haven't seen it. You have no proof to support that. In fact if any government is practical it's socialism. Trotsky was murdered by Stalinists. So.
StiftikBoliovich 8 months ago
@StiftikBoliovich warned: "That's not true (about Communism) and you have no right to say that"
Spoken like a true Communist, huh Ivan?
AnakNangTupa 8 months ago
@AnakNangTupa Well it's never been practiced. So. I mean and what you're saying is spoken by a truly fearful man. Distrusting of his fellow man. You've shown to me over this entire argument I can't really argue with you. Can't argue with an ignorant person after all. So I'm going to be the better man. Goodbye Anak.
StiftikBoliovich 8 months ago
@StiftikBoliovich weaseled: "Well it's never been practiced" (communism)
You Communists have this common excuse that 'real Communism' has never been tried and true--then demonize those who criticize & oppose it.
What we analytical thinkers & other smart observers previewed so far, on the many attempts to push this horrible ideology are stunningly ugly--millions had already been killed, nations collapsed, just to make it happen.
So, no thanks, let's keep Communism a theory not a reality.
AnakNangTupa 8 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@StiftikBoliovich lectured: "Can't argue with an ignorant person after all. So I'm going to be the better man"
For a guy who is still standing for and defending a failed & seriously flawed ideology (Communism), and then calls those who had seen it for what it is, "ignorant"---is the epitome of a Useful Idiot.
Lenin and Marx would pat you in the head for leading the cause of Useful Idiots.
AnakNangTupa 8 months ago
It's a funny story. Vladimir Ulyanov, the one you know as Lenin, did nothing for the revolution. Trotsky fought the russian revolution. He founded most modern military organizations in russia today. He was the first Kommissar. He was a real Kommissar. He didn't shoot people who retreated. He inspired them. With speeches. He inspired them to fight harder in WWI than any other russian soldiers had. They were deserters. They would've been shot had he not intervened.
StiftikBoliovich 8 months ago
The constitution says your government can tax you. Why shouldn't they? I admit the taxes should absolutely be used properly and not embezzled. However it's what makes a strong country. It's why the Union winning the Civil War was a good thing. The Confederates, more along a right wing persons line of thinking, would've set up a confederacy. The country would've been so weak. No ability to tax. People should pay back their society for what it's done for them.
StiftikBoliovich 8 months ago
@StiftikBoliovich
Amendment 16 was an illegal act on the US Constitution by the few powers that be, at that time, that should have been passed by 2/3rds States majority--but, again the liberal left (your Komrades) manipulated it to be included to become law in the amendments, through deception, to be at least the foot at the door to Socialism
AnakNangTupa 8 months ago
@AnakNangTupa Lol my comrades? I don't see the democrats as my comrades. Eh they have saved your country on a few occasions. Big business certainly hasn't done anything for it. Nothing too good anyways. Prosperity isn't worth the cost of human lives. Al Gore is one of the most ridiculous individuals I have ever heard. Although he did win the popular vote in the 2000 election. He lost the electoral. Which is ridiculous. You definitely have some phobia of leftists. As if we cause every problem.
StiftikBoliovich 8 months ago
@StiftikBoliovich : "You definitely have some phobia of leftists. As if we cause every problem"
From Marx to Stalin, from Castro to Che, From East Berlin to the collapse of the USSR, why did they all failed?
You see Utopia is just a figment of one Communist mind's imagination--cause it will never work.
AnakNangTupa 8 months ago
@AnakNangTupa Well you must realize they've never founded a Utopia. Lenin was shot. Marx never even was the leader of a country. The CIA has very effectively put down communism. McCarthyism put it down in the US. Fear mongerers and selfish individuals have put down the revolution. Stalin has influenced many regimes. Which is a sad thing. He was a fascist. Communism would either have to be practiced in a small isolated community or in a worldwide system.
StiftikBoliovich 8 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@StiftikBoliovich uttered: "Well you must realize they've never founded a Utopia"
It's because it doesn't exist, cause it's a MYTH!
AnakNangTupa 8 months ago
@AnakNangTupa Is it a myth? I believe that the US hasn't allowed room for Utopia to be founded. When the February Revolution occured US troops were deployed to Russia. Why? The Tsars were very oppressive. The communists preached power to the people. The US should've sympathized with that. They've always put down communism. It's taught to be this evil thing. It really isn't. Giving a jobless man a job isn't evil. Perfect equality isn't evil. Utopia doesn't profit the rich.
StiftikBoliovich 8 months ago
@StiftikBoliovich cluless: "Perfect equality isn't evil.
So who lives in sheer luxury in Cuba's 'Utopia'? I believe his name is Fidel and his brother Raul.
And have you heard how Mao lives during his reign of terror?
So the communist politburo party bigwigs lives in a tiny cramp apartments too?
Equality my ass!
AnakNangTupa 8 months ago
@AnakNangTupa Eh man lol. You actually think communism has been practiced in this world? On the surface of this planet? No. The children of the soviet and the soviet itself were in fact socialist countries. Money still existed. Money was created so business owners couldn't screw each other. Communism is an internationalist belief. Stalin practiced a nationalistic socialism. Therefore he was actually a Nazi. Thus is so for Fidel and all of Stalin's successors.
StiftikBoliovich 8 months ago
@StiftikBoliovich asks: "You actually think communism has been practiced in this world? "
You're too slow--how many times have I reiterated that Utopia will not work cause it's a myth?
Ergo, Sherlock, that translates that communism has never happened and it'll never happen based on that fact!
only communist boneheads like you exists, and just keep trying to make it work and failing for centuries.
AnakNangTupa 8 months ago
@AnakNangTupa Haha. I didn't know you were God? So because you say it will never work it will never work? Someday I'm going to get to throw you a very smug look. And you my friend are going to be eating your words. It has never been practiced. Nor has an actual attempt been made. You've seen a wave of two step method revolutions. Trotskyism holds high the idea of permanent revolution. Two step method requires a short period of dictatorship of the proletariot. That's the failure. The ruse.
StiftikBoliovich 8 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@StiftikBoliovich smugly: "Someday I'm going to get to throw you a very smug look. And you my friend are going to be eating your words"
Sounds like threat.
And I supposed you'll be leading the 'revolution'?
Better read Che Guevarra's SHORT life, Komrade you might learn a valuable lesson there on survival.
I wonder what the future holds for you, my little proletariat komrade?
AnakNangTupa 8 months ago
@StiftikBoliovich Yells: "Power to the People" (before and during the 'struggle')
After the 'struggle" Like Fidel, and Mao, they sequestered all the mansions and lives on them, with young women of course!!
Form one oligarch to another---that's how Communism works!!
AnakNangTupa 8 months ago
@AnakNangTupa Haha you are a funny bastard. I suppose living in the US makes you cynical. You suspect that compassion comes with ulterior motives. I can't speak for those who have taken the name of communism in the past. I know myself as wanting less pay for politicians. The right to bare arms should be allowed. I'll never take that away from people. It shouldn't be taken away. I believe in a government that actually serves its people. You can say all you wish. Men have fought and died for this.
StiftikBoliovich 8 months ago