Anyone else notice that the fire inside the building during the DX11 run ( visible between 2:40 and 2:46 ) doesn't emit any ambient light while in DX 10 and 10.1, it does?
fags want to compare dx11 to shitty dx9 at 1080p youtube quality lol, god rays, water effects, no polygonal objects, lol stick to your shitty computers.
this video it cant show normally the differencem, because it has those little windows and if you'll watch it on HD it wouldnt change something anyway! there should be more videos on comparing those dxs just to people see the difference between them also if someon gonna read this comment and he will make a video like i said then listen "use 2 windows not more than 2,also use explosions on super high graphics games like bc2 bc2 vietnam NO CoD because it doesnt have something special effect" :)
btw guys ,you can't see in benchmarking that a lot DX, DX you can see in-game by your self playing it, in benchmark actually you can see only fps at many different view and places where fps can effect your video card settings on what fps shows, at bright light looks something like that, in dark places it is like that and so on. Better is to see it by your self, in this benchmark could e improved, should put stormy time to see changes in rain or lightning, DX changes that.
i only see between DX11 and 9 differences ,but if you go slowly trough 9 to 11 of course you cant see differences, it's ,too complicated to explain and difficult to explain ether, differences are visible watching only DX11 and only DX9, in-game i see differences when i had card only with DX9 as maximum available, and now i have with DX11, i see differences in-game, the sun rays are more detailed and smoky like almost in real life, not smoky, but dusty i think.
Right off the bat it looks to me like DX9 "for some reason :S" has less AA and less HDR, also seems to be less perceived depth in the picture...bottom line though is that the quality of the video make them nearly impossible to tell apart, also scenery is moving too fast, and the images are too small....at any rate draw distance for foliage is WAY too low in the game for this kind of demo
@McFlanker DX doesn't presents AA lol, you know what DX does ? the atmosphere is changing, DX makes differences not in quality ,but in atmosphere, all that you can see outside is atmosphere not quality or performance, and HDR the same ,it's nothing to do with DX, read and learn more ,you slowly learning my friend. DX makes more dynamics in-game, makes the realistic atmosphere not a quality ,you can put AA to 0, but it won't change DX settings, those are different thing.
i saw an game that Supports DX11 ! and i have it on High on my PC and on high on my brothers pc but dx11 system and there ! there i see the diference ! and Both pc's are on high Settings that i belive it ! i just dont belive the Bullshits settings like the Crysis or Stalker . lol what means you cant get very high on dx9 :p i just have it on very high with an Confing and i didnt saw any diference on Both Pc's :P
on dx10-11 you can get the graphics higher than dx9 ..... and that system i saw it on crysis too ! on DX9 you can get it on High only and on DX10 on very high but you know something ? i Think these is BULLSHIT !! Because the only way that it looks better on dx11 is because you can get the graphicks Higher ! and On Crysis i got an Comfing ! that have the Very High Settings and the game is Working !! is Working like i have an dx10 system so i dont belive this shits !
I'm getting this computer i built up. Could you tell me if it is worth it? Any problems cause this is my first build and i don't want to screw it up..thx! XD Phenom II AM3 x4 955 Black edition Gigabyt 790XT-USB3 2GBx2 Kingston DDR3 LG SATA EVGA GTX460 1GB SuperClocked DDR3 21.5" LED 650W GX Cooler Master Elite 310 Casing (nothing special) Windows 7 Home Premium 64-bit Now my only question is, how much space do i need in my HDD? I don't use up so much but I'd like it to be quite fast and cheap.
there's a big difference between DX10 and DX9 (not in this game though, U can see the differ. in Crysis), and very very minor difference between DX10 and DX11
Dear ive watched you VDo several times but havnt understood were is the difference??? u should have to mention the differences in each of the four VDOs, either Light quality,texure quality,shader quality etc which made difference among these four !!
I noticed some major differences in visuals from DX9 to DX10. not so much in DX11, But to be fair early DX10 games had no real improvments from DX9. We need to give it a while before it's optimized and developers use the features of DX. And FOR FUCK SAKE!!! stop putting "Song name Please"
X-Ray engine has its own physics engine and it does not need the DX11 rendering path to be implemented. You must be thinking of PhysX, which Stalker does not use. It does benefit from allowing AA, Tessellation, and Soft Shadows in DX11, but otherwise the game is identical to DX10. DX10 and DX11 allows wet surfaces, volumetric smoke + light and AA. DX9 does not feature those (due to deferred shading AA is not possible in DX9). DX9 does use vector based edge shading to simulate AA
Explain how DX11 offers better physics? DX11 is a a new API that offers many things (tessellation, API multi-threading, compute-shading, faster filtering options) but NOWHERE does DX11 have anything to do with physics. The X-Ray engine features its own physics engine. DX11 DOES NOT DO PHYSICS!
from a graphical point of view not much of a difference if you ask me , except the lightning and dx looks a lil just a lil bit better than dx 9...the physics are different ... but that are for the hard core gamers who want everything that this game can offer for the better experience...oh...where is the tesselation in dx 11 ?
@ipnhesbro Always download singleplayer games man, im not wasting my money on Metro 2033 either lol 60 dollars on a game that offers 10 hours of gameplay yeah right...
Its the best 60 bucks you'll spend all year. Metro is short, but completely worth it provided you have the gear - same goes for Cryostasis IMO, that was the best game of last year.
Last but not least - you are only giving credence and justification for publishers and developers to insist on utilizing absurd DRM if you just DL games. They may be full of BS half the time, but you're a thief most of the time.
I just dont want to pay 60 bucks for a game that you play in a few hours. I dont care how realistic it is or how strong the atmosfere is, I just think its crazy to pay 60$ for 4 hours of gameplay. Hell Im never going to support devellopers if there greedy enough to do that. I bought stalker call of prypjat just because it has a great atmosfere and you can play it for 30+ hours. Same with mass effect 2, fallout 3 and oblivion. Those game are worth paying $60+ for.
As someone who has grown up loving games all my life it really bugs me how much trash (game or content wise) some companies throw out, and more importnatly it appauls me how many people just lap it up like 4-5 hours of game is ok.
@WartyWarlock No it isnt, and bear in mind that companies make millions of dollars profit this way, but for me the time they spend on developing a short game like this, and the price I have to pay for it, man it just doesnt make any fucking sense..
@Alimannetje well...there are many different gameplay types, you can pay 60 for short but really awesome game (not talking in graphics),for example,MW2 is great but 6h of gameplay,i don't care because than i can play multiplayer, and stalker is great game too,you can play few hours of awesome gameplay with great story line and missions,so,if you want to play loong games,i don't see sense in it, you can play really boring and worst quality like from 199*year taken.
@Alimannetje and you gonna play only just because it is long playable game?that's stupid you know ,you don't get anything of games. Game is only if the story line is great and at least 6h playable. Or if you are so stupid that you never heard of torrents, download, check it, like it / don't like it , than buy it / don't buy simple as that, before spending money have to check it if the game is good to spend money ,sorry that i posted it 8months later :D
Thats not the point, my freakin point is that im not going to pay 60 dollars for a fucking game that is playable for only 6 hours. I downloading it then anyways cos its just too fucking expencive for only 6 hours, no matter how good the storyline is. Its just theft to pay 60 buks for a game that is playable for 6 h, after that u can trow it in a goddamn fire. I will only download games that are that short, no way in hell I buy those short expensive games.
Looks like shit, runs like shit, plays like shit (because of the bugs, not of the gameplay)... did I forget something?
Oh yeah, FUCK YOU GSC, YOUR GAMES FUCKING SUCK, QUIT YOUR DAY JOB ALREADY.
4A Games were spot on with their comments about that worthless franchise and the devs who can't code worth a shit. I'll have to wait and see how their Metro 2033 does first tho.
Just play CRYSIS on DX11 and than comparing DX9 with DX11 ,there you can see big differences. Becaus e stalker isn't big FPS game , on CRYSIS you can test FPS
Well, DX11 has Tessellation, but you have to really play it to notice.
Also, I noticed that DX11 has better HDR lighting (especially noticable on the Pripyat sign) and it has better colour correction. (Bushes don't stand out as much as in DX9 and shadows are darker)
Hmmm... I'm sure there's a difference when you're playing it in person. But I've heard the Stalker engine, even in CoP, cannot use more than one core. Is this true?
Thats why this game runs so smoothly on the i7 ;) because of the Hyperboost tech.. It makes ONE core go WAY faster.. and kinda shuts down the others ;)
Your absolutely right. There is no difference whatsoever. I have this game and have tried them. The much hyped DX11 (even dx10) visual-wise do little to nothing. What they do is offer easier, more streamlined ways for programmers to work with. Maybe when DX20 comes out, we'll start to see a real difference.
Hmm I noticed at 0:37 and other instances for all four DX's you can see the grass being drawn...not sure if that's part of Direct X per say or a drawback of the Stalker engine, but it looks terrible.
thats the point there trying to proove i think, but in there ignorance they jsut make themselves look dumb to be honest, the lvl design on this vid sucks ass and theres very low poli count and not a single hi res texture in sight
i have dx11 on windows 7,but seriously by the looks of it it doesnt really make a difference,only the grass is lighter and shadows are more realistic(judging from this clip),stalker got nice graphics btw
Yup, I checked some more and it seems it's PC Games deteriorating quality.
Watch the video with the ID: 6QpAMzTCDpg and see for yourself.
While the quality on that vid is low, you can still clearly see the lighting regardless. There is no difference, none at all. The description even says tessellation and CHS slows down the game.
So, in the end, I guess DX11 hardware is marketing fluff. The only things that are important are better multi-thread and DirectCompute, which also run on DX10 HW.
Hardware tessellation isnt really for current games though they wont see an improvement direct the entire idea is to make a game better looking wtihout a HUGE hit to performance, It will obviously slow the game down some but you can also pick it up if you make things efficiently. This Is one of the early games for Direct X 11 too keep that in mind and it wasnt really originally developed with it in mind or even with proper hardware available to the developers at the time of development.
Yeah, I know early DX11 games are not noteworthy, but I was complaining about the difference in "lighting", which was actually a contrast and brightness trick done by PC Games to suggest that DX11 is better and the quality ups gradually, which is BS.
The only benefit HW tessellation would provide is bigger environments, as you don't have to load the entire environment into memory at once (the tactic is called Divide et Impera) and probably slightly faster speed. Still, I don't see why HW > SW.
@KLASIKALL if you know the differnece you will se them the difference between dx10and 9 is dx10can make almoste evry object unique but dx11 makes everything real 3d so if you see a stair than it is a real stair not a star made out of shadows just look for dx10 benchmarks and you will see it
only improvment you will ever see from dx10 to 11 is tessellation.. and this game doesnt even have that i think -.- which doesnt make it imo a dx11 game..
this is probably a commercial stunt.. to get hardware freaks to buy the game and test it on their new dx11 cards :p
and engine of stalker games have always been shit.. shit pops up and goes away ..buggy as hell man.
@Vleesball but it has one of the best atmospherics it is shitty but it has a really good atmospheric but thats al to bad it is so buggy if it wasn't than it was a very good game
@Vleesball it has a good story but a crappy engine it is a good idea but they just don't have the money like big corporations have if they had that than it would be 5 times better than fallout atleast it is more scary you feel you no where safe in stalker cs and soc but you feel you almost everywhere save in fallout
@Vleesball or just work whit a larger company or hope that moders make good mods for the game so it gets stable i heard it will be more stable whit the dx11 and they first sell it to germany and russia to get money and get the bugs out of it before the world release
Regardless of what video camparison you look at the only difference you'll be able to see is the textures looking like they should, a stone wall actually looks like a stone wall now and character models look more rounded and less blocky.
Poor opinion - are you color blind by any chance? It's clear to see that the lighting and vibrance as well as sharpness of shadows is well improved over the other versions.
Is it me, or does the DX9 render look incredibly aliased? (esp. @
*Checks*
No, it's not just me, and I don't think the game did this automatically either, so that leaves PC Games...
... And if they did that with AA, it won't surprise me if they also resorted to tricks to deteriorate lightning as the DX version got lowered. I don't think DX10 or 9 could have such blurry and foggy graphics. Less colored (lighting), maybe, but not blurry and foggy.
what exactly is the purpose of showing us four screens with little to no difference? Ive seen other comparisons that showed a major improvement with Tessellation
I don't see a damn difference. I mean a big one, the game looks the same in all versions, I won't buy a 300$ car for blurred shadows or anything like this.
The problem with stalker is that its based on the old x-ray engine that is so old it even still supports dx8. And as you can imagine it has allot of bottlenecks when using it in dx10 or dx11. its just a feature they implented but doesn't really hold anything (big) new thing in it. I frequently still have lag in stalker soc because of the engine. when I look a way it lags and the other way I have over 66 fps and more in some cases. nevertheless its still a great gamegreat game
the biggest change i did see was between direct X 8 and 9..... to my opinion microsoft holds the key with DX they are keeping the performance low on windows machines.... ill bet ya a linux system will win from a windows vista machine with the same hardware for years now windows keeps your pc in a comatic state...
Radiation pills? Ready. Ok, I can watch this.
t1czer 1 month ago
hahahahaahahah, stupid console asshole RIP
TheKwod 1 month ago
Tbh i didnt see the difference
ImAKillZoneFan 2 months ago
Anyone else notice that the fire inside the building during the DX11 run ( visible between 2:40 and 2:46 ) doesn't emit any ambient light while in DX 10 and 10.1, it does?
Dhomochev 4 months ago
@Dhomochev yeah! your right i saw it!!! even dx9 has ambient!!! :D
fobosq3 3 months ago
I see a difference, in that DX9 looks a lot clearer than DX11, which just seems blurry
BunkerFox 4 months ago
what i don't like about X-ray engine is the popping out detail and textures
63Jax 5 months ago
1. Enable 1080p
2. Enable Fullscreen
3. Watch video
4. Lol @ people who see no difference
5. ?????
6. PROFIT!
TheSeventiethSeven 6 months ago 2
fags want to compare dx11 to shitty dx9 at 1080p youtube quality lol, god rays, water effects, no polygonal objects, lol stick to your shitty computers.
spartan1081990 6 months ago
@spartan1081990 STFU, DX11 is a wank for wankers.
TheKwod 1 month ago
@TheKwod wanker? lol poor pommy detected lol
spartan1081990 1 month ago
@spartan1081990 aussie with DX11 and it's a wank supported by wankers.
TheKwod 1 month ago
@TheKwod >implying im white
say hello to the queen for me
spartan1081990 1 month ago
can any1 tell me if you ANY difference???
mongini1 6 months ago
My FPS goes down at 11 and I really dont see any difference :P
elel70 7 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
DX9 is the winner
rockstar1720003 7 months ago
Comment removed
rockstar1720003 7 months ago
Существенной разницы нет.
FroziS1 8 months ago 3
dx 9 ownzzzzz have you seen Crysis 2??? OMG
71GA 9 months ago
this video it cant show normally the differencem, because it has those little windows and if you'll watch it on HD it wouldnt change something anyway! there should be more videos on comparing those dxs just to people see the difference between them also if someon gonna read this comment and he will make a video like i said then listen "use 2 windows not more than 2,also use explosions on super high graphics games like bc2 bc2 vietnam NO CoD because it doesnt have something special effect" :)
2010Nodari 9 months ago 2
am i supposed to be seeing a difference?
866152 10 months ago
music name pls?
meetajhu 10 months ago
Dx11 is way better (Normal)
Pedroxpvista 11 months ago
btw guys ,you can't see in benchmarking that a lot DX, DX you can see in-game by your self playing it, in benchmark actually you can see only fps at many different view and places where fps can effect your video card settings on what fps shows, at bright light looks something like that, in dark places it is like that and so on. Better is to see it by your self, in this benchmark could e improved, should put stormy time to see changes in rain or lightning, DX changes that.
BIOSHOCKFOXX 11 months ago
what is the name of this background music ? and artist ? :D sounds good.
BIOSHOCKFOXX 11 months ago
i only see between DX11 and 9 differences ,but if you go slowly trough 9 to 11 of course you cant see differences, it's ,too complicated to explain and difficult to explain ether, differences are visible watching only DX11 and only DX9, in-game i see differences when i had card only with DX9 as maximum available, and now i have with DX11, i see differences in-game, the sun rays are more detailed and smoky like almost in real life, not smoky, but dusty i think.
BIOSHOCKFOXX 11 months ago
Right off the bat it looks to me like DX9 "for some reason :S" has less AA and less HDR, also seems to be less perceived depth in the picture...bottom line though is that the quality of the video make them nearly impossible to tell apart, also scenery is moving too fast, and the images are too small....at any rate draw distance for foliage is WAY too low in the game for this kind of demo
McFlanker 1 year ago
@McFlanker DX doesn't presents AA lol, you know what DX does ? the atmosphere is changing, DX makes differences not in quality ,but in atmosphere, all that you can see outside is atmosphere not quality or performance, and HDR the same ,it's nothing to do with DX, read and learn more ,you slowly learning my friend. DX makes more dynamics in-game, makes the realistic atmosphere not a quality ,you can put AA to 0, but it won't change DX settings, those are different thing.
BIOSHOCKFOXX 11 months ago
@BIOSHOCKFOXX I know that DX doesn't change AA levels etc....I just said that it "looks" that way, which is why I also said: "for some reason :S"
;)
McFlanker 11 months ago
@McFlanker and this is video ,you won't see better ,download or buy the game, only than you can see and say what on your mind.
BIOSHOCKFOXX 11 months ago
me2 cant see a different, but maybe little, soft shadow.
Sa1tant 1 year ago
i can´t see a different
akoya14 1 year ago
There is a difference. DX11 has a DX11 sign, DX10.1 has a DX10.1 sign, DX10 has a DX10 sign and DX9 has a DX9 sign.
psychonaut25 1 year ago 42
@psychonaut25 but can it blend??
oops.. wrong.. i mean:
but are you sure?
therealwouter 1 year ago
@therealwouter That is the question :D
psychonaut25 1 year ago
@psychonaut25 Hahahaha! XD Nice! XD Well said.
Oh,and sorry to bother you,but I had to comment.
didi89s 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
The lightning is different!
Stop at 0:42 an look at the sculpture-lightning. Dx9 & Dx10 looks pretty the same.
WeKillandDie 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
The lightning is different!
Stop at 0:42 an look at the sculpture-lightning. Dx9 & Dx10 looks pretty the same.
WeKillandDie 1 year ago
Comment removed
WeKillandDie 1 year ago
i saw an game that Supports DX11 ! and i have it on High on my PC and on high on my brothers pc but dx11 system and there ! there i see the diference ! and Both pc's are on high Settings that i belive it ! i just dont belive the Bullshits settings like the Crysis or Stalker . lol what means you cant get very high on dx9 :p i just have it on very high with an Confing and i didnt saw any diference on Both Pc's :P
TheDarkman21 1 year ago
on dx10-11 you can get the graphics higher than dx9 ..... and that system i saw it on crysis too ! on DX9 you can get it on High only and on DX10 on very high but you know something ? i Think these is BULLSHIT !! Because the only way that it looks better on dx11 is because you can get the graphicks Higher ! and On Crysis i got an Comfing ! that have the Very High Settings and the game is Working !! is Working like i have an dx10 system so i dont belive this shits !
TheDarkman21 1 year ago
i look again with DX 23 xD
DJHazzard 1 year ago
pretty same :-D
leejordan001 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
andoi9292 1 year ago
I can only see difference between DX 10 and DX 9 but even if I could max it out on dx 9 that would be awesome.
Jamirofan89 1 year ago
dx 10.1 looks cooler than Dx 11
terorvlad 1 year ago
on DX9 You have good rays ? You must using russian DX9 then xD
Provokattor34 1 year ago
The DX11 run looks very washed out compared to the rest.
pcnthuziast 1 year ago
there's a big difference between DX10 and DX9 (not in this game though, U can see the differ. in Crysis), and very very minor difference between DX10 and DX11
deadmanavir 1 year ago
DX10 looks like DX9 and DX11 looks like DX10.1 no differ.
DX10.1 and DX11 has better shadows thats all, quality and texture ar the same.
zappload 1 year ago
That's why I do prefer to spend money on a HD 4890 Crossfire steup than on a single 5870.
vitaobatera 1 year ago
the diference is nothing but sky colour,
rafakragspikedrunk 1 year ago
no difference , just marketing hype
fahast 1 year ago
Dear ive watched you VDo several times but havnt understood were is the difference??? u should have to mention the differences in each of the four VDOs, either Light quality,texure quality,shader quality etc which made difference among these four !!
khaqansaleemchanner 1 year ago
yeah have diffrents some but all almost was same :D
Dragon4830 1 year ago
marketing only :| no diference
autopsiemorga 1 year ago
@autopsiemorga agreed
moomyn 1 year ago
isnt this the music of 3dGamingMan?
eladbari 1 year ago
I noticed some major differences in visuals from DX9 to DX10. not so much in DX11, But to be fair early DX10 games had no real improvments from DX9. We need to give it a while before it's optimized and developers use the features of DX. And FOR FUCK SAKE!!! stop putting "Song name Please"
Get A fucking life.
187781jason 1 year ago
Get some fucking anger management, you bag of rage.
MoaiMaea 1 year ago
@MoaiMaea
LoL
ARRRRRRRRRRGGGGGGHHH ARRRRGGGGG GRRRRRRRRRRRR ARRRRRRRRRRRRRRRR AAAAGGGGGGGRRRRRREEEERRRRRRR.
Thats all the anger managment I need.
187781jason 1 year ago
In that case, enjoy your mid-fifty-heart-attack ...
MoaiMaea 1 year ago
dx 11 has much better lighting, try to focus on that, also distat objects look different, but you have have to watch in 1080p to see it well
jestern001 1 year ago
don't see any difference
K86bG 1 year ago
song name please?
dbosnic 1 year ago
I couldn't stop staring at the shitty pop-in grass that I missed the difference.
irelevent127 1 year ago
i'll be waiting for the fourth stalker game!
Angelslayer007 1 year ago
i cant see any difference between DX10 DX11
Willd86 1 year ago
What music that plays in the back? Does anyone know?
meetajhu 1 year ago
No difference. Even the light rays which i thought were dx10 and higher only appear to also be in dx9? :|
oXIdizzyIXo 1 year ago
@kanal3
X-Ray engine has its own physics engine and it does not need the DX11 rendering path to be implemented. You must be thinking of PhysX, which Stalker does not use. It does benefit from allowing AA, Tessellation, and Soft Shadows in DX11, but otherwise the game is identical to DX10. DX10 and DX11 allows wet surfaces, volumetric smoke + light and AA. DX9 does not feature those (due to deferred shading AA is not possible in DX9). DX9 does use vector based edge shading to simulate AA
spankthru101 1 year ago
I dont see big differences between dx11 and dx9. Its just more polygons, little better shadows and better HDR. Pff...
yowie1991 1 year ago
@kanal3
Explain how DX11 offers better physics? DX11 is a a new API that offers many things (tessellation, API multi-threading, compute-shading, faster filtering options) but NOWHERE does DX11 have anything to do with physics. The X-Ray engine features its own physics engine. DX11 DOES NOT DO PHYSICS!
spankthru101 1 year ago
wtf is the diffrence
bylligamekid 1 year ago
@bylligamekid
It's harder to see the difference when it is just a flyby comparison, close up is better
Kissrocks1000 1 year ago
@Alimannetje u fucking dick head...what about not playing them if you dont wanna spend money on 'em?you freaking rejected retard...
Oh btw...iam not going to pay ur mother to suck my dick anymore since she does a terrible job and its only for 20 minutes :(
P.S. you do notice the fine analogy i did here?pretty cool right?
Valy2valy 1 year ago
from a graphical point of view not much of a difference if you ask me , except the lightning and dx looks a lil just a lil bit better than dx 9...the physics are different ... but that are for the hard core gamers who want everything that this game can offer for the better experience...oh...where is the tesselation in dx 11 ?
Sadornicus 1 year ago
Stalker Call of Pripyat is awesome, much improved from the first Stalker
ThePanzerBattalion 1 year ago
yeah this isnt gonna make me spend atleast 200 buck on a new card for no diffrence at all..
dudeical4 1 year ago
i don't like stalker call of pripyat i just bought it and to be honest i want my money back :(
ipnhesbro 1 year ago
@ipnhesbro Always download singleplayer games man, im not wasting my money on Metro 2033 either lol 60 dollars on a game that offers 10 hours of gameplay yeah right...
Alimannetje 1 year ago
@Alimannetje
Its the best 60 bucks you'll spend all year. Metro is short, but completely worth it provided you have the gear - same goes for Cryostasis IMO, that was the best game of last year.
Last but not least - you are only giving credence and justification for publishers and developers to insist on utilizing absurd DRM if you just DL games. They may be full of BS half the time, but you're a thief most of the time.
spankthru101 1 year ago
@spankthru101
I just dont want to pay 60 bucks for a game that you play in a few hours. I dont care how realistic it is or how strong the atmosfere is, I just think its crazy to pay 60$ for 4 hours of gameplay. Hell Im never going to support devellopers if there greedy enough to do that. I bought stalker call of prypjat just because it has a great atmosfere and you can play it for 30+ hours. Same with mass effect 2, fallout 3 and oblivion. Those game are worth paying $60+ for.
Alimannetje 1 year ago
@Alimannetje *cheer*
As someone who has grown up loving games all my life it really bugs me how much trash (game or content wise) some companies throw out, and more importnatly it appauls me how many people just lap it up like 4-5 hours of game is ok.
It's not! Not in any way!
WartyWarlock 1 year ago 5
@WartyWarlock No it isnt, and bear in mind that companies make millions of dollars profit this way, but for me the time they spend on developing a short game like this, and the price I have to pay for it, man it just doesnt make any fucking sense..
Alimannetje 1 year ago
@Alimannetje well...there are many different gameplay types, you can pay 60 for short but really awesome game (not talking in graphics),for example,MW2 is great but 6h of gameplay,i don't care because than i can play multiplayer, and stalker is great game too,you can play few hours of awesome gameplay with great story line and missions,so,if you want to play loong games,i don't see sense in it, you can play really boring and worst quality like from 199*year taken.
BIOSHOCKFOXX 11 months ago
@Alimannetje and you gonna play only just because it is long playable game?that's stupid you know ,you don't get anything of games. Game is only if the story line is great and at least 6h playable. Or if you are so stupid that you never heard of torrents, download, check it, like it / don't like it , than buy it / don't buy simple as that, before spending money have to check it if the game is good to spend money ,sorry that i posted it 8months later :D
BIOSHOCKFOXX 11 months ago
@BIOSHOCKFOXX
Thats not the point, my freakin point is that im not going to pay 60 dollars for a fucking game that is playable for only 6 hours. I downloading it then anyways cos its just too fucking expencive for only 6 hours, no matter how good the storyline is. Its just theft to pay 60 buks for a game that is playable for 6 h, after that u can trow it in a goddamn fire. I will only download games that are that short, no way in hell I buy those short expensive games.
Alimannetje 11 months ago
@spankthru101 What??? lol if you can WW then OD when they DFU and RSO for PSA all the time... :P
linkirrius 1 year ago
Comment removed
Alimannetje 1 year ago
Comment removed
Alimannetje 1 year ago
Comment removed
Alimannetje 1 year ago
soooo wats the difference?
mikej5337 1 year ago 2
короче до конца 2010 нехер покупать карту с поддержкой ДХ 11
cubaostrov 1 year ago 2
most of the stuff thats in 10.1 and 11 is physics stuff like particles and smoke reacting to stuff hitting it etc...
Rilliden 1 year ago 3
This has been flagged as spam show
Download this and more at FREEGAMERELEASE . C(0)M
Nauss18 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Download this and more at FREEGAMERELEASE . C(0)M
Nauss18 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Looks like shit, runs like shit, plays like shit (because of the bugs, not of the gameplay)... did I forget something?
Oh yeah, FUCK YOU GSC, YOUR GAMES FUCKING SUCK, QUIT YOUR DAY JOB ALREADY.
4A Games were spot on with their comments about that worthless franchise and the devs who can't code worth a shit. I'll have to wait and see how their Metro 2033 does first tho.
NeoXF 1 year ago
@NeoXF, I played through Call of Pripyat without it crashing once.
Clear Sky, maybe not. But still, they're great games. Quit bitching.
imaenith 1 year ago 3
I'm sorry but you seem to be a retard, this game runs very well, it looks good, and it plays well. And this version has none of the old bugs.
borisjake 1 year ago
CANT SEE enny difference cuz we AINT close uP!
MrFrederiktorp 1 year ago 2
DX 11 in this video has less framerate. Might have something to do with Youtube,
I notice that DX 11, 10.1 and 10 have slightly brighter lighting effects.
That's all I notice.
killslim 1 year ago
i honestly don't see a difference in any of them
karstinpk 1 year ago 60
@karstinpk videos dont make difference but you notice in game
TheMJGaming 1 year ago
@karstinpk buy the game to see for yourself!
spartand001 1 year ago
@karstinpk I see difference in a FPS! ;P
XBoXzMoDz 1 year ago
Just play CRYSIS on DX11 and than comparing DX9 with DX11 ,there you can see big differences. Becaus e stalker isn't big FPS game , on CRYSIS you can test FPS
BIOSHOCKFOXX 11 months ago
@BIOSHOCKFOXX Crysis doesn't support DX11. Crysis 2 i think will.
gagetmorris 11 months ago
@gagetmorris after it`s patched in, yeah
purplenumberF 10 months ago
@karstinpk bcoz the resolution of this video is tiny ....
woollerland 11 months ago
@karstinpk the xray engine which is what this game uses only support dx11 lightings but not tessalation
pieflyNERD 9 months ago
Well, DX11 has Tessellation, but you have to really play it to notice.
Also, I noticed that DX11 has better HDR lighting (especially noticable on the Pripyat sign) and it has better colour correction. (Bushes don't stand out as much as in DX9 and shadows are darker)
But really, there is not a lot of difference.
PSPmaster321 1 year ago 4
BAH NO DIFFERENCE
XenoPhobic321 1 year ago
@XenoPhobic321
+1
BadNinja16 1 year ago
the video moved to fast.. and the pictures where way to small...
Acer0c 1 year ago
1080p And Full Screen = Good Quality video and each video yare good
gami323 1 year ago
@gami323
eh i guess i didnt do it on 1080p, my monitor is 1080p but my internet takes forever to load 1080p video, even with youtubes botched quality
Acer0c 1 year ago
10.1 and 11 look identical.
CoolKabbage 1 year ago
Hmmm... I'm sure there's a difference when you're playing it in person. But I've heard the Stalker engine, even in CoP, cannot use more than one core. Is this true?
christpunchers 1 year ago
@christpunchers yea , its sad but true , it only uses one core , the other cores run at idle , and one core is on 100%... :(
Tromi1986 1 year ago
@ mine 2 cores run on 25% and the third one runs @ 98%..
No idea of the 25% is from Stalker or something else xD but yup.. its by default made for 1 core.
D4NG3R03S 1 year ago
well u can say that those 25% are idle , so as u said , it only uses one core ... Such a shame ... :(
Tromi1986 1 year ago
Thats why this game runs so smoothly on the i7 ;) because of the Hyperboost tech.. It makes ONE core go WAY faster.. and kinda shuts down the others ;)
D4NG3R03S 1 year ago
Damn! Just as in DiRT2 I dont see any difference... And DX11 performance leaves much to be desired ...
DeckerBens 2 years ago
@DeckerBens
Your absolutely right. There is no difference whatsoever. I have this game and have tried them. The much hyped DX11 (even dx10) visual-wise do little to nothing. What they do is offer easier, more streamlined ways for programmers to work with. Maybe when DX20 comes out, we'll start to see a real difference.
rodzandz 1 year ago
DiRT 2 only used the basic stuff of DX11, if you look @ benchmarks like the UniEngine (heaven) you can CLEARLY see the difference...
D4NG3R03S 1 year ago
is difficult see the diferences with the HD D:!
kokichman 2 years ago 3
The light render in dx11 is really better...
iRyusa 2 years ago
the "1080p" video quality is so poor, it's impossible to notice a difference :(
XtheLOLflashlightX 2 years ago 42
if you want to see dx 11 search for this,
DX11 Demo in Action
grumm70 2 years ago
D U M B vidio
your not going to see much diference at those speeds who ever made this vid is a numb scull
grumm70 2 years ago
Hmm I noticed at 0:37 and other instances for all four DX's you can see the grass being drawn...not sure if that's part of Direct X per say or a drawback of the Stalker engine, but it looks terrible.
djphatd 2 years ago
@djphatd agreed this engine is so out dated with little patches of hi rez tec here and there.
ZR0SuM 2 years ago
shadows are the best on dx 9 and bloom is slightly better on dx11 or worse if you don't like ENB style bloom
kubampower 2 years ago
Maybe iam blind, but where are the differences?
DieWalze 2 years ago 6
you wont see any on this vidio mate,
thats the point there trying to proove i think, but in there ignorance they jsut make themselves look dumb to be honest, the lvl design on this vid sucks ass and theres very low poli count and not a single hi res texture in sight
grumm70 2 years ago
even on dx11 the grass looks bad, you dont have long view distance and the grass dont looks natural
sokolel 2 years ago
i have dx11 on windows 7,but seriously by the looks of it it doesnt really make a difference,only the grass is lighter and shadows are more realistic(judging from this clip),stalker got nice graphics btw
SilentShotV 2 years ago
dx9 rulez -10/10.1/11/ fack
ozon671 2 years ago 3
wow! Huge Difference between 9 and 11!!!
cwbh10 2 years ago
Yup, I checked some more and it seems it's PC Games deteriorating quality.
Watch the video with the ID: 6QpAMzTCDpg and see for yourself.
While the quality on that vid is low, you can still clearly see the lighting regardless. There is no difference, none at all. The description even says tessellation and CHS slows down the game.
So, in the end, I guess DX11 hardware is marketing fluff. The only things that are important are better multi-thread and DirectCompute, which also run on DX10 HW.
Cloud7337 2 years ago
Hardware tessellation isnt really for current games though they wont see an improvement direct the entire idea is to make a game better looking wtihout a HUGE hit to performance, It will obviously slow the game down some but you can also pick it up if you make things efficiently. This Is one of the early games for Direct X 11 too keep that in mind and it wasnt really originally developed with it in mind or even with proper hardware available to the developers at the time of development.
linadragon 2 years ago
Yeah, I know early DX11 games are not noteworthy, but I was complaining about the difference in "lighting", which was actually a contrast and brightness trick done by PC Games to suggest that DX11 is better and the quality ups gradually, which is BS.
The only benefit HW tessellation would provide is bigger environments, as you don't have to load the entire environment into memory at once (the tactic is called Divide et Impera) and probably slightly faster speed. Still, I don't see why HW > SW.
Cloud7337 2 years ago
check out Dirt 2's hardware tesselated water... :P
Hellknight3d 2 years ago
Comment removed
Cloud7337 2 years ago
Comment removed
Cloud7337 2 years ago
Comment removed
Cloud7337 2 years ago
Comment removed
Cloud7337 2 years ago
Comment removed
Cloud7337 2 years ago
Comment removed
Cloud7337 2 years ago
Comment removed
Cloud7337 2 years ago
Comment removed
Cloud7337 2 years ago
i didnt expect any changes in graphics between these 4. Its all a marketing gimmick imo.
simonmitchellbird 2 years ago
Is this a joke? There's no difference whatsoever.
Slimebeast 2 years ago
@Slimebeast then you should sit down with your nintendo 64 and play that instead.
ggeeiirr1100 2 years ago
cant see difference
KLASIKALL 2 years ago
@KLASIKALL if you know the differnece you will se them the difference between dx10and 9 is dx10can make almoste evry object unique but dx11 makes everything real 3d so if you see a stair than it is a real stair not a star made out of shadows just look for dx10 benchmarks and you will see it
themassau 2 years ago
i think 9 has most fps
SexuelleCurrywurst 2 years ago
the only difference...
textures and DX10.1 will be better performance than DX10
DX11 tessellation... cant see any here
invisible0tom 2 years ago
only improvment you will ever see from dx10 to 11 is tessellation.. and this game doesnt even have that i think -.- which doesnt make it imo a dx11 game..
this is probably a commercial stunt.. to get hardware freaks to buy the game and test it on their new dx11 cards :p
and engine of stalker games have always been shit.. shit pops up and goes away ..buggy as hell man.
Vleesball 2 years ago
@Vleesball
Also compute shader.
dvdhny 2 years ago
@Vleesball but it has one of the best atmospherics it is shitty but it has a really good atmospheric but thats al to bad it is so buggy if it wasn't than it was a very good game
themassau 2 years ago
@Vleesball ow yea the shy is different and the gasmasks are finely round just look on the internet it has smal differences in stalker
themassau 2 years ago
Ive seen it.. but this game is horrible thou :p
Vleesball 2 years ago
@Vleesball it has a good story but a crappy engine it is a good idea but they just don't have the money like big corporations have if they had that than it would be 5 times better than fallout atleast it is more scary you feel you no where safe in stalker cs and soc but you feel you almost everywhere save in fallout
themassau 2 years ago
yeah i know its budget game ..
thats why they should sell their company... or atleast this IP..
Vleesball 2 years ago
@Vleesball or just work whit a larger company or hope that moders make good mods for the game so it gets stable i heard it will be more stable whit the dx11 and they first sell it to germany and russia to get money and get the bugs out of it before the world release
themassau 2 years ago
Regardless of what video camparison you look at the only difference you'll be able to see is the textures looking like they should, a stone wall actually looks like a stone wall now and character models look more rounded and less blocky.
MichaelBradley1988 2 years ago
no difference... poor dx11 game...
tehhalders 2 years ago
Poor opinion - are you color blind by any chance? It's clear to see that the lighting and vibrance as well as sharpness of shadows is well improved over the other versions.
XI0Corporations 2 years ago
wheres the tessellation, all these textures look 2d.
jasonf81 2 years ago
Is it me, or does the DX9 render look incredibly aliased? (esp. @
*Checks*
No, it's not just me, and I don't think the game did this automatically either, so that leaves PC Games...
... And if they did that with AA, it won't surprise me if they also resorted to tricks to deteriorate lightning as the DX version got lowered. I don't think DX10 or 9 could have such blurry and foggy graphics. Less colored (lighting), maybe, but not blurry and foggy.
Cloud7337 2 years ago
@Cloud7337
When will people learn that the Direct X version is just the API and has no effect on the "brightness" or contrast...
dvdhny 2 years ago
DX11 has better lighting...
macca1088 2 years ago
It does not looks like the developers know how to implement dx11 in their games.
orrekorre 2 years ago
what exactly is the purpose of showing us four screens with little to no difference? Ive seen other comparisons that showed a major improvement with Tessellation
stinkey1217 2 years ago 2
I don't see a damn difference. I mean a big one, the game looks the same in all versions, I won't buy a 300$ car for blurred shadows or anything like this.
66xXJOKERXx99 2 years ago 2
The problem with stalker is that its based on the old x-ray engine that is so old it even still supports dx8. And as you can imagine it has allot of bottlenecks when using it in dx10 or dx11. its just a feature they implented but doesn't really hold anything (big) new thing in it. I frequently still have lag in stalker soc because of the engine. when I look a way it lags and the other way I have over 66 fps and more in some cases. nevertheless its still a great gamegreat game
SchaapjeDeluxe 2 years ago
the biggest change i did see was between direct X 8 and 9..... to my opinion microsoft holds the key with DX they are keeping the performance low on windows machines.... ill bet ya a linux system will win from a windows vista machine with the same hardware for years now windows keeps your pc in a comatic state...