Rain did cause the flooding, it was the tilting of the earth, waters was displaced from former oceans to early cities and civilization causing tsunamis and flooding. Rain and storm was weather anomaly during the tilting of the earth. The Grand Canyon maybe a barren land but it was an studies shows that is was an ocean few years ago.
I would simply beg you all to step outside the box of what the public schools and our Godless media has pumped down your throat since you were born, and do some real research. Starting with findings of antiquity (old books for you that are uneducated), then with archeology, then with history. There are more historical facts and findings that prove the Bible is the most accurate historical book in the history of mankind. But you and your Godless teachers will continue to spout lies.
@dirtyharrycallahan1 It is higly probable the biblical authors borrowed the Noah story from Sumeria (Shinar in the bible). We have the original clay writtings today. Sumer stories predate anything in the bible by thousands of years. What is the LOGICAL conclusion of this?
Internal Dark Lord has proven himself the king of the ignorant by claiming the "Bible never mentions mount Ararat." It clearly says in Genesis that the ark came to rest on Mount Ararat." So he's either a troll or an idiot. Sorry but true. And the rest of you must be young products of the public school indoctrination centers where they deny fact and distort history all so they can control the weak minded. And unfortunately, all of these replies prove they are succeeding. Enjoy being a slave.
This is so blasphemous. The ark was not made up by Jewish scribes. The Bible is a historic document with infinately more real evidence than even that of Julius Caesar. There are literally over 5,000 pieces of antiquity found that have scriptures on them that match ours today. #2 in history is Homer's Iliad with only 750 copies on antiquity. Not even close. This Bible is the most well documented piece of antiquity ever.
@dirtyharrycallahan1 The Bible is a cartoon book from the Iron Age that claims trees existed before the Sun ,and talking serpents made a rib woman eat a magic apple
You aren`t supposed to take it seriously. Read some science if you want to research mankind`s attempt to uncover objective truth. It is far more beautiful and compelling than some load of cobblers about a boat full of vegetarian T Rex`s
@ilikezappa HAHAHAHAAHAH you are SO ignorant! Don't you see how it actually happened? Read up on the old earth view, it's way more biblically supported than the young earth view, which always manages to put off rational people like you who realize science is merely observation of the facts, which CLEARLY does not match up with the young earth view.
@angryspidertv Does the "old Earth view" address the fact that the geological evidence is not there for a global flood . Neither is there any mechanism known to science that could produce anything like that amount of water. Where did it go ? Did God produce a giant plughole? I don`t care if something is "Biblically supported" The Bible is a load of Bronze age bollocks. Science does not support a global flood . Period.
@ilikezappa Hehe still haven't done your research, I see. The main point of an Old Earth is that the flood was NOT global. I acknowledge and argue that it's not scientifically supported X) I think the flood was local.
Well , lots of cultures have stories about great deluges ,but it`s hardly surprising if you never go more than twenty miles from your village , a large flood where you had to rescue the goats might cause a few stories. The problem is when grown men ,who have been to school (at least some of them) try to tell you that modern Biology should be ignored in favour the Noah Story. I agree with you in essence. The fundies are nutters
@angryspidertv ahahaha nice ignorant And the waters prevailed exceedingly upon the earth; and all the high hills, that were under the whole heaven, were covered.opps so much for it being local.Go ahead make something up like you always do.and they were destroyed from the earth: and Noah only remained alive, and they that were with him in the ark.don't sound local ta me.fail pal again
@alltiedup217 The word 'erets', which means 'Earth' to us, is used multiple times to mean the whole of the inhabited Earth instead. The Bible says people all over the world came to Solomon, that does not mean people from China or the Maya came to him. God would not need to flood his entire world if humans were only located in or around Mesopotamia. Instead he flooded the entire ERETS in water. 2 Peter 3:6 By these waters also the world of THAT TIME was deluged and destroyed. I think u fail :P
Bottomline, the world corrupt system does not want you to believe the Bible and has hidden all evidence they can. Scientists deny God even though Black matter and all the studies clearly point to God (but they are too blind to see it in front of their faces). Even the bible says, "a fool says in his heart, there is no God."
I found a whole story made out of Watermarks on Our Planet using Google Earth and I found them in something else to. I just posted my latest video- I found pictures of God! I've put the story together and made a video of it to share with you. When your finished tell someone what you saw this day !! He Lives ! Come see my Channel and look at the Amazing things I've found ! I even found the Garden of Eden - come see !!
After WWII 1945 (after killing jews, gypsies, gays), in 1949 US airforce plane photographed in the ice a boat structure (->there're no randoms). So the mountain is the same age with the boat... Volcanic mountain (wikipedia) and was under water... It only could be published in 1995 about the boat.
@MultiGakka Hogwash, the Ark was "discovered" many times, in different places, on different mountains, even in different countries. The Bible never even mentions Mount Ararat, that is the name of the range.
@InternetDarkLord ok tell me where are they discovered many times? The video is front of you. If you have eyes you can see. You didn't tell me the name of the mountains, countries. Do you read Bible? If not, please be quiet.
@InternetDarkLord ok tell me where are they discovered many times? The video is front of you. If you have eyes you can see. You didn't tell me the name of the mountains, countries. Do you read Bible? If not, please be quiet. That's the place where they found it and evidences show it like on the video if you have ears you can hear it. Next question?
@MultiGakka The bible says the "mountains of Ararat." "Mount Ararat" is a name from a later century, there is no evidence Agri Dag is the right mountain. The ark has also been found on Mount Judi in Iran. And glacier ice would have pushed anything wood off the summit a long time ago anyway.
@InternetDarkLord The Bible doesn't say that; only landed on a mountain. (But found it!!!! Thanx for the modern technology) cuz it didn't have a name of the mountain yet what under water had been formed during world flood as volcanic mountain. Is it clear now? The most important thing is they found it as an evidence.
@MultiGakka Bull Shit, none of your unsupported claims have evidence. And how do you know Mount Judi isn't the right one? People have found the ark there. "Evidence" is the same.
Whenever the rainbow appears in the clouds, I will see it and remember the everlasting covenant between God and all living creatures of every kind on the earth.”
@InternetDarkLord Who are humans to say God didn't do something if that thing is in the Bible.
God is not human, that he should lie, not a human being, that he should change his mind. Does he speak and then not act? Does he promise and not fulfill?
@InternetDarkLord ...... You for real, God never said anything In the Bible?
Genesis 1:3
And God said, “Let there be light,” and there was light.
Yes rainbows are God's handywork, the universe is God's handywork. If he did not make it, you and I would not be having this discussion, besides, God made the science we study today.
Nothing in all creation is hidden from God’s sight. Everything is uncovered and laid bare before the eyes of him to whom we must give account.
@CallofDutyVideos100 Hogwash, you are just citing the Bible as proof of the Bible, and there are many religions with many holy books claiming the same things. Your circular reasoning makes me dizzy.
Rainbows are caused by raindrops reflecting and refracting sunlight. They happened a billion years ago and have nothing to do with fictional divine promises.
Again you did not listen, God created everything We see today; ask yourself, are rainbows manmade? No then where do they come from, yes the raindrops reflecting and refracting sunlight with the different kinds of light in the air. Yes, now where did that all come from, the rain: from clouds built up, The clouds, from condensing and evaporation, who made evaporation and that. God. God made the things we study today and use, Therefore, We must give credit to God for these things
@InternetDarkLord ... I figured you could put 2 and 2 together but obviously not.
If you are christian, then you believe God made everything.
If you are jewish or muslim You still believe that.
The Bible is like a big history book, it was not made up; it gives specific dates and times of things that happened sometimes. Even major historians say this.
That is why you can relate back to the bible for information.
Proof the Bible doesn't lie- Records of Jesus's death from Romans. Israelites in exi
@InternetDarkLord Cherry picking facts? Or cherry pick the whole Bible, Major historians can back me up too. Theres a thing called carbon dating. Yes?
And I know you will say "that doesn't prove stories are real", yea sure it doesn't but it proves it somewhat, so again, I thought you could be logical, but again i must explain...sigh
It is a religion, a religion I believe, what does that make it? A faith, you must have faith to believe in a religion.
@CallofDutyVideos100 Carbon dating, and a hell of a lot of other dating methods, prove the universe is older than the Bible says, and no global flood ever happened: Chronostratigraphy, coral reef layering, bryozoan reef stratification, dendrochronology, fossil indexes, geomagnetic dating, lichenomtry, Milankovitch cycles, Mitochondrial DNA, ocean sediment cores, desert varnish, polar ice sheet cores, varves, written records, Y-chromosome DNA, want more?
@InternetDarkLord You know what's great? GOD he can do wondrous things, he tells us not scientifically how he made the earth but enough for faith. Who says God could not do all these things, who says carbon dating is right? Who says human reason is right, because it seems to be wrong a lot of the time. God can do what he wants, what if when God made the earth a day was a long time? He never says what a "day" is. It can be years! And your science cannot disprove Jesus, and that he preachedTheword
@CallofDutyVideos100 Damn are you Fanatical! You just cite the Bible over and over as proof. Meanwhile, I am debating a Muslim on another channel, who says exactly the same thing about another dumb book!
@InternetDarkLord Damn what a hypocrite! Is stating "your science" any more different from stating a book? Ask yourself this, you are stating from a source, Yes we all use sources for things, think 2 times before you say something like that again, where does science come from, well they study and put it in books and internet sources, isn't that the Bible but with science. I have nothing against science I love it, but view that God made all the components in it.
@CallofDutyVideos100 No, I THINK before I believe science books instead of blindly cherry picking them. Do you stone unruly children? Do you give all your money to the poor? Do you kill witches? Do you refuse to resist evil? Do you sell your daughters? Do you mark Hebrew slaves' ears with an awl? Do you never take oaths? Do you kill people who work on the Sabbath? Do you never marry a divorced woman? Do you kill women raped within the city walls? Do you think?
@InternetDarkLord Do You get the Bible because right now your quoting the Bible like you said I should not do again hypocrite. But Do you realize that was their culture, weren't they forced into exile and other stuff by God? They do a bad thing, they learn, no different from today. And do you think before you read science books, you talk mostly about killing there and stuff, does science think before it creates something? No science can't think, its the imperfect humans behind it.
@CallofDutyVideos100 Science is the result of people like me thinking. And everything you said about the Bible merely proves it is false, no different than people saying the earth was flat, because of their culture, or they were not forced to believe it. So we agree the Bible is full of nonsense.
@InternetDarkLord Obviously u cannot interpret me correctly so since u cannot even think for a moment the bible could be right i will fight fire with fire, or science with science and history proving the Bible.
About 85% of the rock surface around the world is made up of sedimentary rock, indicating that at some time in the past, the world was covered by water.
@CallofDutyVideos100 WRONG! That does not prove all that rock came from one global flood. And that is physically impossible, because of the heat of formation. Limestone (calcite) releases 11,290 joules per gram of energy when it sets. 5,600,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000 joules, plus all the magma in the earth's layers, plus the meteor impacts in the layers....the ocean would be red hot steam. Massive layers are only physically possible over long periods, nor do they have to form at once.
@InternetDarkLord Wrong or is God just cool like he can do whatever he wants, and sediment that deposited over 1000's of year would harden again...anyways, Researchers suggest that virtually all modern men—99% of them, says one scientist—are closely relatedgenetically and share genes with one male ancestor,dubbed "Y-chromosome Adam.
The Bible is the only Book in the world that has precise, specific predictions that were made hundreds of years in advance and that were "literally" fulfilled
@CallofDutyVideos100 It is possible for stone to harden over long periods as the heat would be dissipated over a long time. One Global flood was impossible. The Y-chromosome Adam lived over 60,000 years ago, nor was he the only man, just somebody in everyone's family tree. The INBREEDING and INCEST from Noah's Flood would be massive and obvious.
The Bible is full of false predictions, like Nile River drying up. When did that happen? I missed this amazing event, can you describe it?
@InternetDarkLord .....Dude, didn't I say If you were christian God could do anything he wanted, and even if you cannot believe in creationism...
"the universe and the laws of physics seem to have been specifically designed for us. If any one of about 40 physical qualities had more than slightly different values, life as we know it could not exist
Either atoms would not be stable, or they wouldn't combine into molecules
@InternetDarkLord No I didn't say that. I said WRITE IT DOWN HERE for me. Can you read what I wrote? I said write it down for me not about the ark. If u wanna argue with me go find someone else for that purpose. IF you THINK you are smarter than you are. (In whose eyes?)
@InternetDarkLord I got a lot to say, but since I am like a 5 years (like a child which i agree with you) you wouldn't believe in me. :P God bless you. Take care.
@uayfb1 I HAVE proven I am a green elephant with 17 arms, because I created everything. And just look at all of the world's creation!!n It's PROOF I am a green elephant with 17 arms.
IF....IF... you can see the absurdity of the above statement. THEN, you MUST (being honest) be able to see the problem with your statement that GOD's evidence is in creation.
Or is that Buddah's evidence, or Ganesh's evidence (also an elephant god), or Allah's proof, etc.
@Futureplanet All your statement shows is that the old sayinjg that those whom God will destroy He first makes mad is true. Your explanation of nature is it happened that way because it happened that way because it happened that way. No explanation at all. The Stuff Happens Law; why is there anything instead of nothing? Oh, you know, stuff happens. You see design, but insist it isn't. That is not only a logical fallacy, it's sad. Your fear of God is clouding your reasoning.
@uayfb1 If we had 100 foot blue trees, you would claim they exist by God's creation. If humans never had eyes, but flew on giant wings and used sonar, you would claim sonar is too sophisticed to have evolved and is proof of god's creation.
The fact is, you use "WHAT IS" as proof of God. You have decided to fail ever accepting a new idea which could be truth, you have decided God made everything, and therefore you don't want to learn science, due to fear of find out the real truth.
@Futureplanet This will come as a complete surprise to you, but many great scientists of the past were Christians; Kelper, Faraday, Newton, Agassitz, to name a few. They were not afraid of science at all; indeed it is because of their Christian faith they took up science. A world made by an intelligent God would be intelligible: they expected intelligible universe, and this is what they saw. Albert Einstein no Christian (cont)
"They were not afraid of science at all; indeed it is because of their Christian faith they took up science"
>You make it sound as if these men of science had any choise. Assertion that they took upon themselves to study natural phenomenon because of their faith, bypasses the fact that in those eras, they had no choise.
You try to use those scientists as tools against modern era secular scientific field, but leave out the Cultural demands of their eras.
@uayfb1 This is absolutely no surprise to me at all. I knew about these people. So, if I name another bunch of smart people that are atheists will that have some weight for God not existing?
These ancient people that didn't know about DNA, that didn't know about evolution, that didn't know about atomic structures, about galaxies, etc.
Some scientists were muslim, some were buddist. So what???
It's 2011, time to leave ancient myths and move into the future.
said: "Religion without science is lame, science without religion is blind." As I said, not a Christian, but he saw no problem with both being involved.
@Futureplanet You can't have it both ways. If caring is a result of natural selection, then so is genocide. If a caring marriage is due to natural selection, then so is rape. All our responses can be catergorized in that way. Nature as you understand it cares nothing whether it produces Disneyland or Hell on earth. It is totally indifferent (Richard Dawkins's own words), and to claim otherwise means you are arguing intelligent design.
@Futureplanet "Or is that Buddah's evidence"-Futuredunce
>Maya dreamed that a white elephant with six tusks entered her side, and ten months later gave birth. In any case, Buddhism doesn’t have a ‘savior’; Buddha is supposed to have shown the way to ‘Nirvana’, freedom from the endless reincarnational cycles of death and rebirth into a suffering world.
@DUNKDAEXCESS 9/11 hijackers were criminal. Yet they believed they were doing good. They were doing God's work. It takes religion for "good" people to do evil things.
@uayfb1 I understand nuclear fusion. Does that mean I want to blow up a nuclear bomb?
You make a huge mistake with believing understanding the process of suvival of the fittest, and somehow believing that means our behaviour needs to be immoral in some way.
The FACT is, evolution, and survival of the fittest has brought about love, caring and empathy. Those socities that didn't care, didn't survive. That's why we don't learn love, it's a natural biological and chemical process.
new version: "The Sheep Is Break Down - Noah's Ark in an Ice Cave: Fact or Fiction?" look for it under youtube channel "TravelBeam". Noah's Ark fraud by Parasut and the Chinese NAMI team. Fraud is a felony.
"Try 2 visualize this chance. Suppose we take 10 to the 17th power SilverDollars & lay them on theFaceOfTexas. They will coverAll of the state 2 ft deep. Now mark 1 of these SilverDollars & stir theWhole mass thoroughly. Blindfold a man & tell him he must PickUp 1 SilverDollar. What chance would he have of Getting the marked one? Just theSame chance that theProphets would've had of writing these 8 prophecies & having them All come true in any One man.
"The bible is truth? Give me one piece of evidence that the bible is true. You have none."-Futuredork
4. “There can be no doubt that archaeology confirmed the substantial historicity of the old Testament tradition.”“It may be stated categorically that no archaeological discovery has ever controverted a Biblical reference.” - Nelson Blueck, renowned Jewish archaeologist
The bible has no historical basis whatsoever. Jesus is not mentioned in any historical documents, and there is not a single writer who has alive during the "supposed" life of Jesus that mentioned him.
Everything points to the bible being just another work of fiction like every other religious book.
I don't understand why you are claiming I think the bible is true when it is clear that a book filled with unicorns, witches and 800 year old men is a fairytale.
@Futureplanet "I don't understand why you are claiming I think the bible is true when it is clear that a book filled with unicorns.."-Futuredunce
>Of course you "don't understand". Yes, there are unicorns in the Bible, but not in the sense of the modern fairy-tale variety which have been indoctrinated into your shallow mind.
The rendering of the Hebrew "reem" occurs seven times in the Bible and denotes the Bos primigenius ("primitive ox"), which is now extinct all over the world, silly.
@Futureplanet Listen dope, you have no idea of who you are dealing with and I'm one up on you in that i am aware of your "Game" and jesuitical purpose of trolling for minds on the Youtube social engineering network for the Jesuit cretins directing human society into a world without God for the Jesuit Order's centuries old quest of a satanic "Do As Thou Wilt" Society of despotic world tyranny under the Papal Caesar Dynasty Temporal Power of unHoly Rome.
@SpencerBenedict2nd Continue to believe what you want to believe. That's your failing. I will change my mind as evidence arrives, that is called learning and having an open mind.
Your mind is closed. Your belief has you by a strangle-hold, so claiming to be 1 up, or claming that truth is on your side, I find sad and pathetic. Since you don't search truth, you defend belief. You search for things that fit your pre-determined model.
As for your Jesuit rant, I think you need a padded room.
@Futureplanet "Since you don't search truth, you defend belief."-Futureplanet
>I believed a great many things most my life, till one day not long after 2001 i began peeling the scales from my eyes & realized most of the things i believed in turned out to be bullshit. Well, i took drastic measures and threw out everything i "thought" i knew and started from scratch. A proverbial 'defrag' & reboot of my personal computer if you will.
My mind is not "closed". I have been imbued w/Universal Truth.
@SpencerBenedict2nd Since you believed bullshit in the past, maybe you believe it now. Since it is well known to any psychologist that the greatest indicator of future behaviour is past behaviour.
What I think is poor of you, is to jump to insults immediately because I am expressing a different opinion. Not very Christian.
imagine a short-tempered, non-college educated male with problems at home. Why else are you so closed to science and so quick to insult.
@Futureplanet When have i ever insulted you? If your referring 2 you being a dunce, i call them like i see them. I mean no harm but appreciate truth and honesty.
"Religion is faith, not truth."-Futuredunce
The definition of theory is fine.
Evolution needs a change of definition to bypass the fact that there are no facts.
Then evolutionists can say "in spite of the lack of facts, evolution in in total, a fact".
Evolution is assertion, speculation. a fraud, a farce, a faith. It's a Religion.
@Futureplanet I'm not closed to science. I just abhor jesuit sponsored and created false-science hoaxes of lies and deception designed to manipulate minds to discount biblical gospel truth and undermine the existence of God in the minds and hearts of mankind. I deplore these jesuit cretins and there centuries old quest of reigning in their satanic 'Do As Thou Wilt' society in order to achieve dominion for the popish Caesar sitting upon his lofty thrown atop the Seven Hills of Rome.
@SpencerBenedict2nd Since you believed bullshit in the past, maybe you believe it now. Since it is well known to any psychologist that the greatest indicator of future behaviour is past behaviour.
What I think is poor of you, is to jump to insults immediately because I am expressing a different opinion. Not very Christian.
imagine a short-tempered, non-college educated male with problems at home. Why else are you so closed to science and so quick to insult.
@SpencerBenedict2nd Since you believed bullshit in the past, maybe you believe it now. Since it is well known to any psychologist that the greatest indicator of future behavior is past behavior.
What I think is poor of you, is to jump to insults immediately because I am expressing a different opinion. Not very Christian.
imagine a short-tempered, non-college educated male with problems at home. Why else are you so closed to science and so quick to insult.
@Futureplanet "As for your Jesuit rant, I think you need a padded room."-Futuredunce
Dictionary Definitions
Jesuit: one of the order or society of Jesus. One of a religious order belonging to the Roman catholic Church. founded by Ignatius Loyola in the 16th century; a crafty person ; an intriguer
Jesuitical, pertaining to the Jesuits or their principals and arts; designing; cunning; deceitful; prevaricating
@Futureplanet "As for your Jesuit rant, I think you need a padded room."-Futuredunce
The Jesuits offer the world at large a system of theology by which every law, Divine and human, may be broken with impunity, and by which the very Bulls of Popes may be defied. It is a ghastly religion; it is a religion to be abhorred by all honest and honorable men. — M. F. Cusack, Converted Nun of Kenmare, 1896, The Black Pope.
@Futureplanet "As for your Jesuit rant, I think you need a padded room."-Futuredunce
From The New Encyclopedia or Universal Dictionary of Arts and Sciences
(Loyola)... left his disciples two famous books 1. Spiritual Exercises; 2. Constitution or Rules of The Order. But thou these avowed institutes contain many privileges obnoxious to the welfare of society, the most diabolical are contained in the private rules entitled, Monita Secreta.
@Futureplanet "As for your Jesuit rant, I think you need a padded room."-Futuredunce
Encyclopedia Britannica
JESUITS, or the Society of Jesus; a famous religious order of the Romish church, founded by Ignatius Loyola. See Ignatius.--The plan which this fanatic formed of it's constitution and laws was suggested, as he gave out, and his followers still teach,..."; "... his design met at first with violent opposition."; "... a spirit of action and intrigue is infused into all its members."
If you're calling me a Jesuit, that's pretty odd. Maybe someone else will call me a Mongol, and someone else can call me an Islamic fighter, and someone can call me a Japanese Samurai.
I'm as much a Jesuit as I am a Mongol, Muslim or a Samurai
That's why I said rant.
Encyclopedia Britannica
1: to talk in a noisy, excited, or declamatory manner
@Futureplanet "If you're calling me a Jesuit, that's pretty odd."-F.D.
>I'll clarify. Im not calling you a jesuit priest. The word "jesuit" was around long before Loyola's nefarious Society reared its ugly head. Once people caught on to their diabolical corruptions they began 2B labeled 'jesuit' because of the manner. They were/are cunning; deceitful; prevaricating. Since they couldn't shake the derogatory label that had been affixed them, they took on the name and began changing dictionaries.
JESUITS, a religious body, w/a military constitution. Its superior was called its general; and his government was despotic. Its motive... benevolent ambition. Its object... universal empire.; "... by every private intrigue it sought to attain an imperious ascendancy over mankind. Its aim was to rectify every disorder in society;..The mean by which this was executed, was the possession of unlimited power "..the scourge of mankind
(4) JESUITS CONSTITUTION OF THE ORDER OF ...informing the members to not only take greater part in the affairs of the world than any other body of monks, but to acquire superior influence in the conduct of them. ; There is not in the annals of mankind, any example of such a perfect despotism exercised, not over monks shut up in a convent, but over men dispersed over all nations of the earth.
JESUITS, a monastic order, instituted by the Pope of Rome""remarkable for their activity and free intercourse with the world; and none were admitted... but persona of superior cunning and parts. ..by their subtle arts and intrigues, had obtained immense influence in all the popish kingdoms.; .seeking incessantly the aggrandizement of their order without regarding means, they became a most powerful and dangerous body.
from A FAMILY ENCYCLOPAEDIA OF, AN EXPLANATION OF WORDS AND THINGS
JESUITS. An order in the Romish church, political and religious, corresponding with the chief at Rome, and acting as spies in all countries where they are tolerated. In 1773, they were abolished as dangerous to the peace of nations, but restored in 1820.
from ENCYCLOPAEDIA AMERICANA A POPULAR DISCYIONARY
JESUITS, or SOCIETY OF JESUS; a religious order, which rose influence and power far above all the other orders, though strictly prohibiting its members to accept any office in the church, and which, in the art of ruling, excelled the governments of the world no less than its ecclesiastical rivals. No other religious order affords a parallel to this.;..
JESUITS,..A society which... extended its influence to the very ends of the earth, and proved the main pillar of the papal hierarchy, which not only wormed itself into almost absolute power, occupying the high places, and leading captive the ecclesiastical dictator of the world, must be an object of some curiosity to the inquisitive mind, especially as it has been recently restored by the present pope,.."
The Jesuits have been notorious for attempting the lives of princes. The reign of Queen Elizabeth presents a succession of plots. In her proclamation, dated Nov, 15, 1602, she says, that "Jesuits had fomented the plots against her person, excited her subjects to revolt, provoked foreign princes to compass her death, engaged in all affairs of state, and by their language and writings had undertaken to dispose of her crown.
Lucius enumerates five conspiracies of the Jesuits against James I. before he had reigned a year. They contrived the Gunpowder Plot. ; Henry III. of France, was assassinated by Clement, a Jesuit, in 1589. The Jesuits murdered William, prince of Orange, in 1584. They attempted the life of Louis XV for imposing silence on the polemics of their order, besides innumerable other atrocities.
from THE WORLD'S PROGRESS, AN INDEX TO UNIVERSAL HISTORY
JESUITS. -... Even in Romish countries, the intrigues and seditious writings of this order, have occasioned it to be discountenanced. The Jesuits were expelled in England by proclamation... ; Restored by Pius VII... and since tolerated in other states and even where not tolerated, the body, as now in England, possesses a secret and extensive existence.
JESUIT,..They have kept alive the spirit of persecution in the Church of Rome...They insinuate themselves into every society,..with persons of rank,..that they may..secure their co-operation in the various intrigues in which they are incessantly engaged;.. assert for the Church of Rome the most unlimited... and they justify the most atrocious crimes, if perpetrated for the good of the church.
A CYCLOPAEDIA OF ILLUSTRATIONS OF MORAL AND RELIGIOUS TRUTHS
JESUIT - A Jesuit may be shortly described as an empty suit of clothes, with another person living in them, who acts for him, thinks for him, decides for him..and moves him about wheresoever he pleases;..but leaves him..not even the power to refuse obedience when order to commit the most atrocious of crimes.... Obedience to the superior is his only idea of virtue,..- Dr. Southey
Jes'uits,..Its prin. object became the maintenance of the absolute dominion of the pope against anything which showed an independent tendency. ; In many countries they actually controlled all education. ; ... throughout Europe between 1815 and 1848 the Jesuits succeeded in penetrating all countries, with or without the acknowledgment of the govt.; -CLEMENS PETERSEN.
JESUITS, ...Their great principle of action is not so much the advance of Christianity, as the extension of the Papal power ; and in effecting this, their great maxim is "the end will justify the means." The Society is still flourishing, and has a power which is probably as little imagined as it is unknown to all but themselves.
from 5000 FACTS AND FANCIES, A Cyclopaedia of Important And Unique Information In History
Jesuits. A religious order in the Roman Catholic Church... ; The Jesuits acquired great influence in the Roman Catholic Church, and finally came to wield extensive political power. As a result, they were suppressed, or banished, from Portugal, Spain, France, Italy, and other European countries, as detrimental to the public interests.
@SpencerBenedict2nd Your CLEAR hostility shows everyone on youtube what an ugly little person you must be. I am sorry about your personal problems, obviously you are fighting some demons in your mind to be so tormented as to strike out with such rage and nonsense.
You use the word "Jesuit" in everyday language that I do not, and therefore you use that to claim some superior high ground. Again illustrating an enormous social weakness, which likely is the root of your personal issues.
@SpencerBenedict2nd Continue to believe what you want to believe. That's your failing. I will change my mind as evidence arrives, that is called learning and having an open mind.
Your mind is closed. Your belief has you by a strangle-hold, so claiming to be 1 up, or claiming that truth is on your side, I find sad and pathetic. Since you don't search truth, you defend belief. You search for things that fit your predetermined model.
As for your Jesuit rant, I think you need a padded room.
@SpencerBenedict2nd How are you delusions of grandeur coming along? You think you are so much above someone you don't even know. This is called paranoid delusion. Often associated with Schizophenria.
Listen dope, you have no idea of who you are dealing with and I'm one up on you in that i am aware of your "Game" and jesuitical purpose of trolling for minds on the Youtube social engineering network for the Jesuit cretins directing human society into a world without God for the Jesuit Order's centuries old quest of a satanic "Do As Thou Wilt" Society of despotic world tyranny under the Papal Caesar Dynasty Temporal Power of unHoly Rome.
"Unicorn is a mythical horse-like animal with a SINGLE horn, nothing like an ox."-Futuredunce
>You obviously read too many Brothers Grimm stories & grew up gazing hypnotically at Brothers Hildebrandt fairy-tale posters plastered on your bedroom walls, while you werent playing Dungeons & Dragons w/your butt-buddy's.
It's not been until recently the evidences of its existence have been confirmed by Rosenmuller, "Morgenland, ii. p. 269" & by Prof. Robinson "Calmet, pp. 908, 909."
"Unicorn is a mythical horse-like animal with a SINGLE horn, nothing like an ox."-Futuredunce
>The now extinct unicorn was a single horn oxen type animal and this is what's referred to in the Bible, seven times. This is not the modern-day mythical horse creature that flutters around in that wispy brain of yours, silly.
King James Bible
"God brought them out of Egypt; he hath as it were the strength of an unicorn."-Numbers 23-22
The strength of a unicorn - ראם reem is a wild ox.
"Yes, but what about the foo dogs? I'm still waiting."
>Aha. So, you have utterly lost it?
-We have never had any discussions on yor `FooDogs´, so you really can't wait for something which is not real...
While it is clear that you try to "amuse" yourself from the rather deep hole you have dug yourself into, (with all your assertions) this will not work.
@Futureplanet King James Bible God brought them out of Egypt; he hath as it were the strength of an unicorn. New International Version God brought them out of Egypt; they have the strength of a wild ox. Bible in Basic English It is God who has taken them out of Egypt; his horns are like those of the mountain ox. Young's Literal Translation God is bringing them out from Egypt, As the swiftness of a Reem is to him; Scofield Reference Notes unicorn i.e. the aurochs, or wild ox. Your so silly.
".. there is not a single writer who has alive during the "supposed" life of Jesus that mentioned him."-Futuredunce
>You simply don't know what you are talking about. Stop embarrassing yourself.
-Noah's grandfather Methuselah is historically documented as the longest lived human at 969 years. During the Antediluvian Age, both human and animal life-spans were vastly superior than post-Flood life expectancy due to the catastrophic changes in earths atmosphere and nutrient, silly.
@SpencerBenedict2nd SpencerBrainless, humans CANNOT live to 969. Our telemeres are like an internal genetic clock, and shorten with age. You MUST know this is absurd.
I can give you a new atmosphere in a special chamber for your whole life, I can recreate the conditions, and you must know (unless you are a complete moron) that no person is going to live past 150, even that is pushing it. 969 is complete fairytale material, let alone everything else.
@SpencerBenedict2nd Are you for real? Are you trying to fool me or yourself?
If I can a newborn, put them in a bubble, and exactly recreate the atmosphere (that you claim) and nutrients, that baby will live to 969?
What about telemere shortening? Huh? How do you get around that one wiseman?
What about ice cores from greenland and antartica which tell us about the atmosphere 5000 years ago, which were very similar to today. you complete liar or ignorant religous zealout.
"What about telemere shortening? Huh? How do you get around that one wiseman?"-Futuredunce
>There's nothing to get around, but it does supply support for the jesuit evolution theory hoax being complete bunkum as everything is slowly breaking down over time and loosing information and never gaining new.
"What about ice cores from greenland and antartica which tell us about the atmosphere 5000 years ago, which were very similar to today."-Futuredunce
>At least your very close on the "5000 years" age part, for the fact that the polar ice caps were a consequence of the catastrophic historic 2348 B.C. Deluge Event. So a more accurate figure would be 4,360 years ago.
And hence, the ice core "atmospheric" sample similarities are due to being post-Flood, silly.
"The bible is truth? Give me one piece of evidence that the bible is true. You have none."-Futuredork
3. “Discovery after discovery has established the accuracy of innumerable details, and brought increased recognition to the value of the Bible as a source of history.” - William F. Albright, American archaeologist and educator known for his excavations of biblical sites, 1891-1971
"The bible is truth? Give me one piece of evidence that the bible is true. You have none."-Futuredork
2. "It may be stated categorically that no archaeological discovery has ever controverted a Biblical reference. Scores of archaeological findings (over 25,000) have been made which confirm in clear outline or exact detail historical statements in the Bible. And, by the same token, proper evaluation of Biblical descriptions has often led to amazing discoveries."
"The bible is truth? Give me one piece of evidence that the bible is true. You have none."-Futuredork
1. "I know of no finding in archaeology that`s properly confirmed which is in opposition to the Scriptures. The Bible is the most accurate history textbook the world has ever seen."
-Dr Clifford Wilson, director of the Australian Institute of Archaeology
Powered flight: 1890 = Theory / Wright Brothers: credited with inventing and building the world's first successful airplane and making the first controlled, powered and sustained heavier-than-air human flight, on December 17, 1903 = No Longer Theory.
Physical reality of flight based on the theory that air travels at a differing speed over the top of a curved wing than it does the lower, flat surface of the wing - unlike what occurs in the flight of a bird.
Why are christians so afraid of evolution =? Evolution means that gods creations can adapt to their environment ... this makes them MORE perfect. In fact by denying this they deny the perfection in gods creation. EVolution is adaption from information in your envirment. Lift something heavy , you got stronger! God is creating here and now.
@roffpoff If they were all - down to their very last molecule - created by the Father of Jesus, who was / is / and shall forever be PERFECT, how could they?
And exactly how did we end up with 400,000 species of beetles? Did the Lord have some kind of a strange bug fetish - or did the little buggers evolve AFTER Noah and his Big Boat to Turkey?
And who said species should not go extinct. Animals are not separate from nature , they are the nature itself, and nature is always changing. If not some species could disappear other new species could not take their place in the system.
@roffpoff ... And who said species should not go extinct ...
If you believe the Holy Bible - you did, as there was no death prior to Adam & Eve's FALL.
All the animal life that went extinct and laid down a fossil record prior shows evidence that the Lord allowed them to perish, no? If dinosaurs didn't inhabit the fringes of the Garden of Eden - eating ONLY plant life - when humans were first there, of course.
See how ridiculously stupid Bible interpretation and fantasizing can get.
Wow. That's quite a fetish you've got there. You over-reacted and made all those entries based on that site. You again reinforced my perspective that you can't actually function on your own and are simply a regurgitating drone.
You have my sympathy, SpencerBenedict2nd. Please seek mental help.
@fonna How can you see good without the evil(we see by contrasts). Satan is just as important as god, because he shows you the other side. God made satan , since he made everything, What is free will without chose? You always harvest the fruits of your choosing anyway. That how i have understood it , im happily non religious.
The planet’s deepest ocean trench is 36,168 feet deep.
That’s equivalent to 2,252,543.040 pounds of pressure per square foot at the bottom of that 6.85 mile deep water column.
Added to the water that was already there Pre-Flood, that works out to be a total of 4,066,014 pounds per square foot at the depth of 13.35 miles – from the surface of the water to the bottom of a known trench.
Isn’t The Lord truly wonderful?
(makes me wonder why there aren't fields of diamonds down there!)
is it the the fossil of noah's ark in turkey?
elmeron21 1 week ago
@elmeron21 No, it does not exist, nor is the current Mount Ararat ever named in the Bible.
InternetDarkLord 4 days ago in playlist Favorite videos
WHY so many dislikes for this video?
OMGitsSEVEN 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Photos were first suspected by Turkish military cartographer named Cournal Ilhan Durupınar in 1959 not by CIA you moron Americans...
MrDenocan 1 month ago
Comment removed
MrDenocan 1 month ago
it all seems to be centerd around middleast from what it always sounds like
littleone2813 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Rain did cause the flooding, it was the tilting of the earth, waters was displaced from former oceans to early cities and civilization causing tsunamis and flooding. Rain and storm was weather anomaly during the tilting of the earth. The Grand Canyon maybe a barren land but it was an studies shows that is was an ocean few years ago.
gregnibiru 2 months ago
I would simply beg you all to step outside the box of what the public schools and our Godless media has pumped down your throat since you were born, and do some real research. Starting with findings of antiquity (old books for you that are uneducated), then with archeology, then with history. There are more historical facts and findings that prove the Bible is the most accurate historical book in the history of mankind. But you and your Godless teachers will continue to spout lies.
dirtyharrycallahan1 2 months ago
@dirtyharrycallahan1 Prozac can do wonders for people like you.
InternetDarkLord 2 months ago
@dirtyharrycallahan1 It is higly probable the biblical authors borrowed the Noah story from Sumeria (Shinar in the bible). We have the original clay writtings today. Sumer stories predate anything in the bible by thousands of years. What is the LOGICAL conclusion of this?
thybigballs 2 months ago
Internal Dark Lord has proven himself the king of the ignorant by claiming the "Bible never mentions mount Ararat." It clearly says in Genesis that the ark came to rest on Mount Ararat." So he's either a troll or an idiot. Sorry but true. And the rest of you must be young products of the public school indoctrination centers where they deny fact and distort history all so they can control the weak minded. And unfortunately, all of these replies prove they are succeeding. Enjoy being a slave.
dirtyharrycallahan1 2 months ago
@dirtyharrycallahan1 No, the Bible says, "the mountains of Ararat." READ the book!
InternetDarkLord 2 months ago
This is so blasphemous. The ark was not made up by Jewish scribes. The Bible is a historic document with infinately more real evidence than even that of Julius Caesar. There are literally over 5,000 pieces of antiquity found that have scriptures on them that match ours today. #2 in history is Homer's Iliad with only 750 copies on antiquity. Not even close. This Bible is the most well documented piece of antiquity ever.
dirtyharrycallahan1 3 months ago
@dirtyharrycallahan1 Pure Hogwash. The Christians destroyed many pagan books like Mayan codices, so of course there fewer copies!
InternetDarkLord 3 months ago
@dirtyharrycallahan1 The Bible is a cartoon book from the Iron Age that claims trees existed before the Sun ,and talking serpents made a rib woman eat a magic apple
You aren`t supposed to take it seriously. Read some science if you want to research mankind`s attempt to uncover objective truth. It is far more beautiful and compelling than some load of cobblers about a boat full of vegetarian T Rex`s
ilikezappa 3 months ago
@ilikezappa HAHAHAHAAHAH you are SO ignorant! Don't you see how it actually happened? Read up on the old earth view, it's way more biblically supported than the young earth view, which always manages to put off rational people like you who realize science is merely observation of the facts, which CLEARLY does not match up with the young earth view.
angryspidertv 2 months ago
@angryspidertv Does the "old Earth view" address the fact that the geological evidence is not there for a global flood . Neither is there any mechanism known to science that could produce anything like that amount of water. Where did it go ? Did God produce a giant plughole? I don`t care if something is "Biblically supported" The Bible is a load of Bronze age bollocks. Science does not support a global flood . Period.
ilikezappa 2 months ago
@ilikezappa Hehe still haven't done your research, I see. The main point of an Old Earth is that the flood was NOT global. I acknowledge and argue that it's not scientifically supported X) I think the flood was local.
angryspidertv 2 months ago
@angryspidertv
Well , lots of cultures have stories about great deluges ,but it`s hardly surprising if you never go more than twenty miles from your village , a large flood where you had to rescue the goats might cause a few stories. The problem is when grown men ,who have been to school (at least some of them) try to tell you that modern Biology should be ignored in favour the Noah Story. I agree with you in essence. The fundies are nutters
ilikezappa 2 months ago
@angryspidertv ahahaha nice ignorant And the waters prevailed exceedingly upon the earth; and all the high hills, that were under the whole heaven, were covered.opps so much for it being local.Go ahead make something up like you always do.and they were destroyed from the earth: and Noah only remained alive, and they that were with him in the ark.don't sound local ta me.fail pal again
alltiedup217 2 months ago
@alltiedup217 The word 'erets', which means 'Earth' to us, is used multiple times to mean the whole of the inhabited Earth instead. The Bible says people all over the world came to Solomon, that does not mean people from China or the Maya came to him. God would not need to flood his entire world if humans were only located in or around Mesopotamia. Instead he flooded the entire ERETS in water. 2 Peter 3:6 By these waters also the world of THAT TIME was deluged and destroyed. I think u fail :P
angryspidertv 2 months ago
Bottomline, the world corrupt system does not want you to believe the Bible and has hidden all evidence they can. Scientists deny God even though Black matter and all the studies clearly point to God (but they are too blind to see it in front of their faces). Even the bible says, "a fool says in his heart, there is no God."
dirtyharrycallahan1 3 months ago
@dirtyharrycallahan1 Those dastardly scientists also do human immortality experiments. Want to bet your life on your talking donkey book?
InternetDarkLord 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
I found a whole story made out of Watermarks on Our Planet using Google Earth and I found them in something else to. I just posted my latest video- I found pictures of God! I've put the story together and made a video of it to share with you. When your finished tell someone what you saw this day !! He Lives ! Come see my Channel and look at the Amazing things I've found ! I even found the Garden of Eden - come see !!
downyourtube 3 months ago
After WWII 1945 (after killing jews, gypsies, gays), in 1949 US airforce plane photographed in the ice a boat structure (->there're no randoms). So the mountain is the same age with the boat... Volcanic mountain (wikipedia) and was under water... It only could be published in 1995 about the boat.
MultiGakka 5 months ago
@MultiGakka Hogwash, the Ark was "discovered" many times, in different places, on different mountains, even in different countries. The Bible never even mentions Mount Ararat, that is the name of the range.
InternetDarkLord 5 months ago
@InternetDarkLord ok tell me where are they discovered many times? The video is front of you. If you have eyes you can see. You didn't tell me the name of the mountains, countries. Do you read Bible? If not, please be quiet.
MultiGakka 5 months ago
@InternetDarkLord ok tell me where are they discovered many times? The video is front of you. If you have eyes you can see. You didn't tell me the name of the mountains, countries. Do you read Bible? If not, please be quiet. That's the place where they found it and evidences show it like on the video if you have ears you can hear it. Next question?
MultiGakka 5 months ago
@MultiGakka The bible says the "mountains of Ararat." "Mount Ararat" is a name from a later century, there is no evidence Agri Dag is the right mountain. The ark has also been found on Mount Judi in Iran. And glacier ice would have pushed anything wood off the summit a long time ago anyway.
InternetDarkLord 5 months ago
Comment removed
MultiGakka 5 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@InternetDarkLord The Bible doesn't say that; only landed on a mountain. (But found it!!!! Thanx for the modern technology) cuz it didn't have a name of the mountain yet what under water had been formed during world flood as volcanic mountain. Is it clear now? The most important thing is they found it as an evidence.
MultiGakka 5 months ago
@MultiGakka Bull Shit, none of your unsupported claims have evidence. And how do you know Mount Judi isn't the right one? People have found the ark there. "Evidence" is the same.
InternetDarkLord 5 months ago
@internetdarklord Before world flood it didn't exist that mountain. After worldflood it did asa volcanic mountain. Later it got a name that mountain.
MultiGakka 5 months ago
@MultiGakka The global flood never happened, and the Bible never mentions which mountain. the names have changed over time.
InternetDarkLord 5 months ago
@InternetDarkLord Why would God make a covenant with Moses never to flood the earth again if a flood didn't happen?
CallofDutyVideos100 4 months ago
@CallofDutyVideos100 That never happened either. Rainbows just happen naturally.
InternetDarkLord 4 months ago
@InternetDarkLord If that never happened...then your saying God lied to us about a covenant? Last time I checked God doesn't lie.
I have set my rainbow in the clouds, and it will be the sign of the covenant between me and the earth.
Genesis 9:13
Whenever the rainbow appears in the clouds, I will see it and remember the everlasting covenant between God and all living creatures of every kind on the earth.”
Genesis 9:16
CallofDutyVideos100 4 months ago
@CallofDutyVideos100 God never said that. The whole thing is a fairy tale. Rainbows are natural.
InternetDarkLord 4 months ago
@InternetDarkLord Who are humans to say God didn't do something if that thing is in the Bible.
God is not human, that he should lie, not a human being, that he should change his mind. Does he speak and then not act? Does he promise and not fulfill?
Numbers 23:19
in the hope of eternal life, which God, who does not lie, promised before the beginning of time,
Titus 1:2
Rainbows may happen naturally, but it was God who created them first, and the way they looked and happened.
CallofDutyVideos100 4 months ago
@CallofDutyVideos100 There is not one shred of evidence God said anything in the Bible.
Yes, rainbows are formed by light shining through rain. They have happened for billions of years.
InternetDarkLord 4 months ago
@InternetDarkLord ...... You for real, God never said anything In the Bible?
Genesis 1:3
And God said, “Let there be light,” and there was light.
Yes rainbows are God's handywork, the universe is God's handywork. If he did not make it, you and I would not be having this discussion, besides, God made the science we study today.
Nothing in all creation is hidden from God’s sight. Everything is uncovered and laid bare before the eyes of him to whom we must give account.
Hebrews 4:13
CallofDutyVideos100 4 months ago
@CallofDutyVideos100 Hogwash, you are just citing the Bible as proof of the Bible, and there are many religions with many holy books claiming the same things. Your circular reasoning makes me dizzy.
Rainbows are caused by raindrops reflecting and refracting sunlight. They happened a billion years ago and have nothing to do with fictional divine promises.
InternetDarkLord 4 months ago
@InternetDarkLord
Again you did not listen, God created everything We see today; ask yourself, are rainbows manmade? No then where do they come from, yes the raindrops reflecting and refracting sunlight with the different kinds of light in the air. Yes, now where did that all come from, the rain: from clouds built up, The clouds, from condensing and evaporation, who made evaporation and that. God. God made the things we study today and use, Therefore, We must give credit to God for these things
CallofDutyVideos100 4 months ago
@CallofDutyVideos100 No, you still gave NO EVIDENCE God did anything. The bible says blah blah blah is not evidence.
InternetDarkLord 4 months ago
@InternetDarkLord ... I figured you could put 2 and 2 together but obviously not.
If you are christian, then you believe God made everything.
If you are jewish or muslim You still believe that.
The Bible is like a big history book, it was not made up; it gives specific dates and times of things that happened sometimes. Even major historians say this.
That is why you can relate back to the bible for information.
Proof the Bible doesn't lie- Records of Jesus's death from Romans. Israelites in exi
CallofDutyVideos100 4 months ago
@CallofDutyVideos100 Records of Jesus death etc, don't prove anything. There are many religions that can say the same thing. Stop cherry picking.
Yes, much of the Bible was made up, Read "The Bible Unearthed." Major Historians will back me up.
InternetDarkLord 4 months ago
@InternetDarkLord Cherry picking facts? Or cherry pick the whole Bible, Major historians can back me up too. Theres a thing called carbon dating. Yes?
And I know you will say "that doesn't prove stories are real", yea sure it doesn't but it proves it somewhat, so again, I thought you could be logical, but again i must explain...sigh
It is a religion, a religion I believe, what does that make it? A faith, you must have faith to believe in a religion.
See now? or must I explain further for You?
CallofDutyVideos100 4 months ago
@CallofDutyVideos100 Carbon dating, and a hell of a lot of other dating methods, prove the universe is older than the Bible says, and no global flood ever happened: Chronostratigraphy, coral reef layering, bryozoan reef stratification, dendrochronology, fossil indexes, geomagnetic dating, lichenomtry, Milankovitch cycles, Mitochondrial DNA, ocean sediment cores, desert varnish, polar ice sheet cores, varves, written records, Y-chromosome DNA, want more?
InternetDarkLord 4 months ago
@InternetDarkLord You know what's great? GOD he can do wondrous things, he tells us not scientifically how he made the earth but enough for faith. Who says God could not do all these things, who says carbon dating is right? Who says human reason is right, because it seems to be wrong a lot of the time. God can do what he wants, what if when God made the earth a day was a long time? He never says what a "day" is. It can be years! And your science cannot disprove Jesus, and that he preachedTheword
CallofDutyVideos100 4 months ago
@CallofDutyVideos100 Damn are you Fanatical! You just cite the Bible over and over as proof. Meanwhile, I am debating a Muslim on another channel, who says exactly the same thing about another dumb book!
InternetDarkLord 4 months ago
@InternetDarkLord Damn what a hypocrite! Is stating "your science" any more different from stating a book? Ask yourself this, you are stating from a source, Yes we all use sources for things, think 2 times before you say something like that again, where does science come from, well they study and put it in books and internet sources, isn't that the Bible but with science. I have nothing against science I love it, but view that God made all the components in it.
CallofDutyVideos100 4 months ago
@CallofDutyVideos100 No, I THINK before I believe science books instead of blindly cherry picking them. Do you stone unruly children? Do you give all your money to the poor? Do you kill witches? Do you refuse to resist evil? Do you sell your daughters? Do you mark Hebrew slaves' ears with an awl? Do you never take oaths? Do you kill people who work on the Sabbath? Do you never marry a divorced woman? Do you kill women raped within the city walls? Do you think?
InternetDarkLord 4 months ago
@InternetDarkLord Do You get the Bible because right now your quoting the Bible like you said I should not do again hypocrite. But Do you realize that was their culture, weren't they forced into exile and other stuff by God? They do a bad thing, they learn, no different from today. And do you think before you read science books, you talk mostly about killing there and stuff, does science think before it creates something? No science can't think, its the imperfect humans behind it.
CallofDutyVideos100 4 months ago
@CallofDutyVideos100 Science is the result of people like me thinking. And everything you said about the Bible merely proves it is false, no different than people saying the earth was flat, because of their culture, or they were not forced to believe it. So we agree the Bible is full of nonsense.
InternetDarkLord 4 months ago
@InternetDarkLord Obviously u cannot interpret me correctly so since u cannot even think for a moment the bible could be right i will fight fire with fire, or science with science and history proving the Bible.
About 85% of the rock surface around the world is made up of sedimentary rock, indicating that at some time in the past, the world was covered by water.
CallofDutyVideos100 4 months ago
@CallofDutyVideos100 WRONG! That does not prove all that rock came from one global flood. And that is physically impossible, because of the heat of formation. Limestone (calcite) releases 11,290 joules per gram of energy when it sets. 5,600,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000 joules, plus all the magma in the earth's layers, plus the meteor impacts in the layers....the ocean would be red hot steam. Massive layers are only physically possible over long periods, nor do they have to form at once.
InternetDarkLord 4 months ago
@InternetDarkLord Wrong or is God just cool like he can do whatever he wants, and sediment that deposited over 1000's of year would harden again...anyways, Researchers suggest that virtually all modern men—99% of them, says one scientist—are closely relatedgenetically and share genes with one male ancestor,dubbed "Y-chromosome Adam.
The Bible is the only Book in the world that has precise, specific predictions that were made hundreds of years in advance and that were "literally" fulfilled
CallofDutyVideos100 4 months ago
@CallofDutyVideos100 It is possible for stone to harden over long periods as the heat would be dissipated over a long time. One Global flood was impossible. The Y-chromosome Adam lived over 60,000 years ago, nor was he the only man, just somebody in everyone's family tree. The INBREEDING and INCEST from Noah's Flood would be massive and obvious.
The Bible is full of false predictions, like Nile River drying up. When did that happen? I missed this amazing event, can you describe it?
InternetDarkLord 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@InternetDarkLord .....Dude, didn't I say If you were christian God could do anything he wanted, and even if you cannot believe in creationism...
"the universe and the laws of physics seem to have been specifically designed for us. If any one of about 40 physical qualities had more than slightly different values, life as we know it could not exist
Either atoms would not be stable, or they wouldn't combine into molecules
CallofDutyVideos100 4 months ago
@CallofDutyVideos100 In a universe without stable atoms or molecules, there is nobody to worry about it. No fine tuning is needed.
InternetDarkLord 2 months ago
@InternetDarkLord Also read the Bible this and if you really read it write it here for me what it said: 2. Timothy 4,3-4. Thank you!!!!! :DDDDDDDD
MultiGakka 5 months ago
@MultiGakka If you mean 2 Timothy, Chapter 4, verse 3-4, it says nothing at all about an ark or Mount Ararat. Read "Alice in Wonderland."
InternetDarkLord 5 months ago
@InternetDarkLord No I didn't say that. I said WRITE IT DOWN HERE for me. Can you read what I wrote? I said write it down for me not about the ark. If u wanna argue with me go find someone else for that purpose. IF you THINK you are smarter than you are. (In whose eyes?)
MultiGakka 5 months ago
@MultiGakka Stop spouting bull shit like retarded 5 year old. If you have nothing to say, don't say it.
InternetDarkLord 5 months ago
@InternetDarkLord I got a lot to say, but since I am like a 5 years (like a child which i agree with you) you wouldn't believe in me. :P God bless you. Take care.
MultiGakka 5 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@MultiGakka You have nothing to say.
InternetDarkLord 5 months ago
Stop fighting in youtube for godsake. Watch the video, and if you don't like just close the whole internet browser. Stop whining here and GTFO!
paulraj5 5 months ago
@uayfb1 I HAVE proven I am a green elephant with 17 arms, because I created everything. And just look at all of the world's creation!!n It's PROOF I am a green elephant with 17 arms.
IF....IF... you can see the absurdity of the above statement. THEN, you MUST (being honest) be able to see the problem with your statement that GOD's evidence is in creation.
Or is that Buddah's evidence, or Ganesh's evidence (also an elephant god), or Allah's proof, etc.
Nature existing is NOT proof of god.
Futureplanet 5 months ago 2
@Futureplanet All your statement shows is that the old sayinjg that those whom God will destroy He first makes mad is true. Your explanation of nature is it happened that way because it happened that way because it happened that way. No explanation at all. The Stuff Happens Law; why is there anything instead of nothing? Oh, you know, stuff happens. You see design, but insist it isn't. That is not only a logical fallacy, it's sad. Your fear of God is clouding your reasoning.
uayfb1 5 months ago
@uayfb1 If we had 100 foot blue trees, you would claim they exist by God's creation. If humans never had eyes, but flew on giant wings and used sonar, you would claim sonar is too sophisticed to have evolved and is proof of god's creation.
The fact is, you use "WHAT IS" as proof of God. You have decided to fail ever accepting a new idea which could be truth, you have decided God made everything, and therefore you don't want to learn science, due to fear of find out the real truth.
Futureplanet 5 months ago
@Futureplanet This will come as a complete surprise to you, but many great scientists of the past were Christians; Kelper, Faraday, Newton, Agassitz, to name a few. They were not afraid of science at all; indeed it is because of their Christian faith they took up science. A world made by an intelligent God would be intelligible: they expected intelligible universe, and this is what they saw. Albert Einstein no Christian (cont)
uayfb1 5 months ago
@uayfb1
"This will come as a complete surprise to you, but many great scientists of the past were Christians"
>Downplaying others is not wise, especially with an obvious assertion as you presented.
-Of course Western scientists of that era werre christians, naturally there was no alternative.
The Sphere of Culture during the eras of these men assured that they had to be christians, or face a wide variety of persecutions.
ArmaFennica 5 months ago
@uayfb1
"They were not afraid of science at all; indeed it is because of their Christian faith they took up science"
>You make it sound as if these men of science had any choise. Assertion that they took upon themselves to study natural phenomenon because of their faith, bypasses the fact that in those eras, they had no choise.
You try to use those scientists as tools against modern era secular scientific field, but leave out the Cultural demands of their eras.
ArmaFennica 5 months ago
@uayfb1 This is absolutely no surprise to me at all. I knew about these people. So, if I name another bunch of smart people that are atheists will that have some weight for God not existing?
These ancient people that didn't know about DNA, that didn't know about evolution, that didn't know about atomic structures, about galaxies, etc.
Some scientists were muslim, some were buddist. So what???
It's 2011, time to leave ancient myths and move into the future.
Futureplanet 5 months ago 4
@Futureplanet (cont)
said: "Religion without science is lame, science without religion is blind." As I said, not a Christian, but he saw no problem with both being involved.
uayfb1 5 months ago
@Futureplanet You can't have it both ways. If caring is a result of natural selection, then so is genocide. If a caring marriage is due to natural selection, then so is rape. All our responses can be catergorized in that way. Nature as you understand it cares nothing whether it produces Disneyland or Hell on earth. It is totally indifferent (Richard Dawkins's own words), and to claim otherwise means you are arguing intelligent design.
uayfb1 5 months ago
@uayfb1
"You can't have it both ways. If caring is a result of natural selection, then so is genocide."
>You described nature. Caring is needed for a group to survive, genocide is a reaction to the limited resources which two groups both want/need.
"If a caring marriage is due to natural selection, then so is rape."
>Marriage is not natural thing, rape actually happens in nature (dolphins). Marriage is a Cultural rule.
Funny enough, bible promotes and demands genocide.
ArmaFennica 5 months ago
@Futureplanet "Or is that Buddah's evidence"-Futuredunce
>Maya dreamed that a white elephant with six tusks entered her side, and ten months later gave birth. In any case, Buddhism doesn’t have a ‘savior’; Buddha is supposed to have shown the way to ‘Nirvana’, freedom from the endless reincarnational cycles of death and rebirth into a suffering world.
Hope this helps. peace
SpencerBenedict2nd 5 months ago
@DUNKDAEXCESS 9/11 hijackers were criminal. Yet they believed they were doing good. They were doing God's work. It takes religion for "good" people to do evil things.
Futureplanet 5 months ago
@Futureplanet I'm talking about devoutly religious people in general. Not the 9/11 hijackers, who are of course, criminal.
DUNKDAEXCESS 4 months ago
@uayfb1 I understand nuclear fusion. Does that mean I want to blow up a nuclear bomb?
You make a huge mistake with believing understanding the process of suvival of the fittest, and somehow believing that means our behaviour needs to be immoral in some way.
The FACT is, evolution, and survival of the fittest has brought about love, caring and empathy. Those socities that didn't care, didn't survive. That's why we don't learn love, it's a natural biological and chemical process.
Futureplanet 5 months ago
new version: "The Sheep Is Break Down - Noah's Ark in an Ice Cave: Fact or Fiction?" look for it under youtube channel "TravelBeam". Noah's Ark fraud by Parasut and the Chinese NAMI team. Fraud is a felony.
TravelBeam 5 months ago
"Try 2 visualize this chance. Suppose we take 10 to the 17th power SilverDollars & lay them on theFaceOfTexas. They will coverAll of the state 2 ft deep. Now mark 1 of these SilverDollars & stir theWhole mass thoroughly. Blindfold a man & tell him he must PickUp 1 SilverDollar. What chance would he have of Getting the marked one? Just theSame chance that theProphets would've had of writing these 8 prophecies & having them All come true in any One man.
-mathematician and scientist, Peter Stoner
SpencerBenedict2nd 5 months ago
@Futureplanet Your silly, silly.
SpencerBenedict2nd 5 months ago
@Futureplanet
"The bible is truth? Give me one piece of evidence that the bible is true. You have none."-Futuredork
4. “There can be no doubt that archaeology confirmed the substantial historicity of the old Testament tradition.”“It may be stated categorically that no archaeological discovery has ever controverted a Biblical reference.” - Nelson Blueck, renowned Jewish archaeologist
SpencerBenedict2nd 5 months ago
@SpencerBenedict2nd Hey???????
The bible has no historical basis whatsoever. Jesus is not mentioned in any historical documents, and there is not a single writer who has alive during the "supposed" life of Jesus that mentioned him.
Everything points to the bible being just another work of fiction like every other religious book.
I don't understand why you are claiming I think the bible is true when it is clear that a book filled with unicorns, witches and 800 year old men is a fairytale.
Futureplanet 5 months ago
@Futureplanet "I don't understand why you are claiming I think the bible is true when it is clear that a book filled with unicorns.."-Futuredunce
>Of course you "don't understand". Yes, there are unicorns in the Bible, but not in the sense of the modern fairy-tale variety which have been indoctrinated into your shallow mind.
The rendering of the Hebrew "reem" occurs seven times in the Bible and denotes the Bos primigenius ("primitive ox"), which is now extinct all over the world, silly.
SpencerBenedict2nd 5 months ago
@SpencerBenedict2nd WHat about 800 year old men, talking snakes, witches, demons, SpenscerSpazhead.
Well? BenedictBoob? Where is your evidence for those fairytales?
Unicorn is a mythical horse-like animal with a SINGLE horn, nothing like an ox. SpencerShithead.
(by the way, is name calling something that gives you comfort? BenedictDickforBrains?
Is the movie "The Hurt Locker" true? It contains historical events (Iraq war). Mentioning any historical event doesn't make fairytales true.
Futureplanet 5 months ago
@Futureplanet Listen dope, you have no idea of who you are dealing with and I'm one up on you in that i am aware of your "Game" and jesuitical purpose of trolling for minds on the Youtube social engineering network for the Jesuit cretins directing human society into a world without God for the Jesuit Order's centuries old quest of a satanic "Do As Thou Wilt" Society of despotic world tyranny under the Papal Caesar Dynasty Temporal Power of unHoly Rome.
Given all that, TRUTH is a tuff opponent.
SpencerBenedict2nd 5 months ago
@SpencerBenedict2nd Continue to believe what you want to believe. That's your failing. I will change my mind as evidence arrives, that is called learning and having an open mind.
Your mind is closed. Your belief has you by a strangle-hold, so claiming to be 1 up, or claming that truth is on your side, I find sad and pathetic. Since you don't search truth, you defend belief. You search for things that fit your pre-determined model.
As for your Jesuit rant, I think you need a padded room.
Futureplanet 5 months ago
@Futureplanet "Since you don't search truth, you defend belief."-Futureplanet
>I believed a great many things most my life, till one day not long after 2001 i began peeling the scales from my eyes & realized most of the things i believed in turned out to be bullshit. Well, i took drastic measures and threw out everything i "thought" i knew and started from scratch. A proverbial 'defrag' & reboot of my personal computer if you will.
My mind is not "closed". I have been imbued w/Universal Truth.
SpencerBenedict2nd 5 months ago
@SpencerBenedict2nd Since you believed bullshit in the past, maybe you believe it now. Since it is well known to any psychologist that the greatest indicator of future behaviour is past behaviour.
What I think is poor of you, is to jump to insults immediately because I am expressing a different opinion. Not very Christian.
imagine a short-tempered, non-college educated male with problems at home. Why else are you so closed to science and so quick to insult.
Religion is faith, not truth.
Futureplanet 5 months ago
@Futureplanet When have i ever insulted you? If your referring 2 you being a dunce, i call them like i see them. I mean no harm but appreciate truth and honesty.
"Religion is faith, not truth."-Futuredunce
The definition of theory is fine.
Evolution needs a change of definition to bypass the fact that there are no facts.
Then evolutionists can say "in spite of the lack of facts, evolution in in total, a fact".
Evolution is assertion, speculation. a fraud, a farce, a faith. It's a Religion.
SpencerBenedict2nd 5 months ago
@Futureplanet I'm not closed to science. I just abhor jesuit sponsored and created false-science hoaxes of lies and deception designed to manipulate minds to discount biblical gospel truth and undermine the existence of God in the minds and hearts of mankind. I deplore these jesuit cretins and there centuries old quest of reigning in their satanic 'Do As Thou Wilt' society in order to achieve dominion for the popish Caesar sitting upon his lofty thrown atop the Seven Hills of Rome.
Alright? Ok?
SpencerBenedict2nd 5 months ago
@SpencerBenedict2nd Since you believed bullshit in the past, maybe you believe it now. Since it is well known to any psychologist that the greatest indicator of future behaviour is past behaviour.
What I think is poor of you, is to jump to insults immediately because I am expressing a different opinion. Not very Christian.
imagine a short-tempered, non-college educated male with problems at home. Why else are you so closed to science and so quick to insult.
Religion is faith, not truth.
Futureplanet 5 months ago
@SpencerBenedict2nd Since you believed bullshit in the past, maybe you believe it now. Since it is well known to any psychologist that the greatest indicator of future behavior is past behavior.
What I think is poor of you, is to jump to insults immediately because I am expressing a different opinion. Not very Christian.
imagine a short-tempered, non-college educated male with problems at home. Why else are you so closed to science and so quick to insult.
Religion is faith, not truth.
Futureplanet 5 months ago
@Futureplanet "As for your Jesuit rant, I think you need a padded room."-Futuredunce
Dictionary Definitions
Jesuit: one of the order or society of Jesus. One of a religious order belonging to the Roman catholic Church. founded by Ignatius Loyola in the 16th century; a crafty person ; an intriguer
Jesuitical, pertaining to the Jesuits or their principals and arts; designing; cunning; deceitful; prevaricating
Jesuitically, In a Jesuitical manner; craftily
SpencerBenedict2nd 5 months ago
@Futureplanet "As for your Jesuit rant, I think you need a padded room."-Futuredunce
The Jesuits offer the world at large a system of theology by which every law, Divine and human, may be broken with impunity, and by which the very Bulls of Popes may be defied. It is a ghastly religion; it is a religion to be abhorred by all honest and honorable men. — M. F. Cusack, Converted Nun of Kenmare, 1896, The Black Pope.
SpencerBenedict2nd 5 months ago
@Futureplanet "As for your Jesuit rant, I think you need a padded room."-Futuredunce
From The New Encyclopedia or Universal Dictionary of Arts and Sciences
(Loyola)... left his disciples two famous books 1. Spiritual Exercises; 2. Constitution or Rules of The Order. But thou these avowed institutes contain many privileges obnoxious to the welfare of society, the most diabolical are contained in the private rules entitled, Monita Secreta.
SpencerBenedict2nd 5 months ago
@Futureplanet "As for your Jesuit rant, I think you need a padded room."-Futuredunce
Encyclopedia Britannica
JESUITS, or the Society of Jesus; a famous religious order of the Romish church, founded by Ignatius Loyola. See Ignatius.--The plan which this fanatic formed of it's constitution and laws was suggested, as he gave out, and his followers still teach,..."; "... his design met at first with violent opposition."; "... a spirit of action and intrigue is infused into all its members."
SpencerBenedict2nd 5 months ago
@SpencerBenedict2nd @SpencerBenedict2nd Yeah, I've heard of the Jesuits and visited many of their forts and castles in Spain and Central America.
If you're calling me a Jesuit, that's pretty odd. Maybe someone else will call me a Mongol, and someone else can call me an Islamic fighter, and someone can call me a Japanese Samurai.
I'm as much a Jesuit as I am a Mongol, Muslim or a Samurai
That's why I said rant.
Encyclopedia Britannica
1: to talk in a noisy, excited, or declamatory manner
Futureplanet 5 months ago
@Futureplanet "If you're calling me a Jesuit, that's pretty odd."-F.D.
>I'll clarify. Im not calling you a jesuit priest. The word "jesuit" was around long before Loyola's nefarious Society reared its ugly head. Once people caught on to their diabolical corruptions they began 2B labeled 'jesuit' because of the manner. They were/are cunning; deceitful; prevaricating. Since they couldn't shake the derogatory label that had been affixed them, they took on the name and began changing dictionaries.
SpencerBenedict2nd 5 months ago
@Futureplanet "As for your Jesuit rant,.."-F.D
POCKET ENCYCLOPEDIA
JESUITS, a religious body, w/a military constitution. Its superior was called its general; and his government was despotic. Its motive... benevolent ambition. Its object... universal empire.; "... by every private intrigue it sought to attain an imperious ascendancy over mankind. Its aim was to rectify every disorder in society;..The mean by which this was executed, was the possession of unlimited power "..the scourge of mankind
SpencerBenedict2nd 5 months ago
@Futureplanet "As for your Jesuit rant,.."-F.D.
ENCYCLOPEDIA PERTHENSIS VOL.XI
(4) JESUITS CONSTITUTION OF THE ORDER OF ...informing the members to not only take greater part in the affairs of the world than any other body of monks, but to acquire superior influence in the conduct of them. ; There is not in the annals of mankind, any example of such a perfect despotism exercised, not over monks shut up in a convent, but over men dispersed over all nations of the earth.
SpencerBenedict2nd 5 months ago
@Futureplanet "As for your Jesuit rant,.."-F.D.
from An HISTORICAL DICTIONARY
JESUITS, a monastic order, instituted by the Pope of Rome""remarkable for their activity and free intercourse with the world; and none were admitted... but persona of superior cunning and parts. ..by their subtle arts and intrigues, had obtained immense influence in all the popish kingdoms.; .seeking incessantly the aggrandizement of their order without regarding means, they became a most powerful and dangerous body.
SpencerBenedict2nd 5 months ago
@Futureplanet "As for your Jesuit rant,.."-F.D.
from A FAMILY ENCYCLOPAEDIA OF, AN EXPLANATION OF WORDS AND THINGS
JESUITS. An order in the Romish church, political and religious, corresponding with the chief at Rome, and acting as spies in all countries where they are tolerated. In 1773, they were abolished as dangerous to the peace of nations, but restored in 1820.
SpencerBenedict2nd 5 months ago
@Futureplanet "As for your Jesuit rant,..."-F.D.
from ENCYCLOPAEDIA AMERICANA A POPULAR DISCYIONARY
JESUITS, or SOCIETY OF JESUS; a religious order, which rose influence and power far above all the other orders, though strictly prohibiting its members to accept any office in the church, and which, in the art of ruling, excelled the governments of the world no less than its ecclesiastical rivals. No other religious order affords a parallel to this.;..
SpencerBenedict2nd 5 months ago
@Futureplanet "As for your Jesuit rant,..."-F.D.
A CHURCH DICTIONARY BY VICAR OF LEEDS
JESUITS,..A society which... extended its influence to the very ends of the earth, and proved the main pillar of the papal hierarchy, which not only wormed itself into almost absolute power, occupying the high places, and leading captive the ecclesiastical dictator of the world, must be an object of some curiosity to the inquisitive mind, especially as it has been recently restored by the present pope,.."
SpencerBenedict2nd 5 months ago
@Futureplanet "As for your Jesuit rant,.."-F.D.
A CHURCH DICTIONARY
The Jesuits have been notorious for attempting the lives of princes. The reign of Queen Elizabeth presents a succession of plots. In her proclamation, dated Nov, 15, 1602, she says, that "Jesuits had fomented the plots against her person, excited her subjects to revolt, provoked foreign princes to compass her death, engaged in all affairs of state, and by their language and writings had undertaken to dispose of her crown.
SpencerBenedict2nd 5 months ago
@Futureplanet "As for your Jesuit rant,..."-F.D.
A CHURCH DICTIONARY BY VICAR OF LEEDS
Lucius enumerates five conspiracies of the Jesuits against James I. before he had reigned a year. They contrived the Gunpowder Plot. ; Henry III. of France, was assassinated by Clement, a Jesuit, in 1589. The Jesuits murdered William, prince of Orange, in 1584. They attempted the life of Louis XV for imposing silence on the polemics of their order, besides innumerable other atrocities.
SpencerBenedict2nd 5 months ago
@Futureplanet "As for your Jesuit rant,..."-F.D.
from THE WORLD'S PROGRESS, AN INDEX TO UNIVERSAL HISTORY
JESUITS. -... Even in Romish countries, the intrigues and seditious writings of this order, have occasioned it to be discountenanced. The Jesuits were expelled in England by proclamation... ; Restored by Pius VII... and since tolerated in other states and even where not tolerated, the body, as now in England, possesses a secret and extensive existence.
SpencerBenedict2nd 5 months ago
@Futureplanet "As for your Jesuit rant,.."-F.D.
THE ECCLESIASTICAL CYCLOPAEDIA
JESUIT,..They have kept alive the spirit of persecution in the Church of Rome...They insinuate themselves into every society,..with persons of rank,..that they may..secure their co-operation in the various intrigues in which they are incessantly engaged;.. assert for the Church of Rome the most unlimited... and they justify the most atrocious crimes, if perpetrated for the good of the church.
SpencerBenedict2nd 5 months ago
@Futureplanet "As for your Jesuit rant,.."-F.D.
A CYCLOPAEDIA OF ILLUSTRATIONS OF MORAL AND RELIGIOUS TRUTHS
JESUIT - A Jesuit may be shortly described as an empty suit of clothes, with another person living in them, who acts for him, thinks for him, decides for him..and moves him about wheresoever he pleases;..but leaves him..not even the power to refuse obedience when order to commit the most atrocious of crimes.... Obedience to the superior is his only idea of virtue,..- Dr. Southey
SpencerBenedict2nd 5 months ago
@Futureplanet "As for your Jesuit rant,.."-F.D.
from NEW GENERAL CYCLOPAEDIA
Jes'uits,..Its prin. object became the maintenance of the absolute dominion of the pope against anything which showed an independent tendency. ; In many countries they actually controlled all education. ; ... throughout Europe between 1815 and 1848 the Jesuits succeeded in penetrating all countries, with or without the acknowledgment of the govt.; -CLEMENS PETERSEN.
SpencerBenedict2nd 5 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@Futureplanet "As for your Jesuit rant,"
from THE CHURCH HANDY DICTIONARY
JESUITS, ...Their great principle of action is not so much the advance of Christianity, as the extension of the Papal power ; and in effecting this, their great maxim is "the end will justify the means." The Society is still flourishing, and has a power which is probably as little imagined as it is unknown to all but themselves.
SpencerBenedict2nd 5 months ago
@Futureplanet "As for your Jesuit rant,.."-F.D.
from 5000 FACTS AND FANCIES, A Cyclopaedia of Important And Unique Information In History
Jesuits. A religious order in the Roman Catholic Church... ; The Jesuits acquired great influence in the Roman Catholic Church, and finally came to wield extensive political power. As a result, they were suppressed, or banished, from Portugal, Spain, France, Italy, and other European countries, as detrimental to the public interests.
SpencerBenedict2nd 5 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@Futureplanet
"As for your Jesuit rant, I think you need a padded room."-Futuredunce
>And you keep pissing all over yourself, and as you stand there drying and looking stupid, try to reason why you do it, dumb ass.
SpencerBenedict2nd 5 months ago
@SpencerBenedict2nd Your CLEAR hostility shows everyone on youtube what an ugly little person you must be. I am sorry about your personal problems, obviously you are fighting some demons in your mind to be so tormented as to strike out with such rage and nonsense.
You use the word "Jesuit" in everyday language that I do not, and therefore you use that to claim some superior high ground. Again illustrating an enormous social weakness, which likely is the root of your personal issues.
Go away
Futureplanet 5 months ago 3
@Futureplanet Not bloody likely going to happen any time soon.
Hope this helps. peace
SpencerBenedict2nd 5 months ago
@SpencerBenedict2nd Continue to believe what you want to believe. That's your failing. I will change my mind as evidence arrives, that is called learning and having an open mind.
Your mind is closed. Your belief has you by a strangle-hold, so claiming to be 1 up, or claiming that truth is on your side, I find sad and pathetic. Since you don't search truth, you defend belief. You search for things that fit your predetermined model.
As for your Jesuit rant, I think you need a padded room.
Futureplanet 5 months ago
@SpencerBenedict2nd How are you delusions of grandeur coming along? You think you are so much above someone you don't even know. This is called paranoid delusion. Often associated with Schizophenria.
Hope that helps. peace.
Futureplanet 5 months ago 5
@Futureplanet
Listen dope, you have no idea of who you are dealing with and I'm one up on you in that i am aware of your "Game" and jesuitical purpose of trolling for minds on the Youtube social engineering network for the Jesuit cretins directing human society into a world without God for the Jesuit Order's centuries old quest of a satanic "Do As Thou Wilt" Society of despotic world tyranny under the Papal Caesar Dynasty Temporal Power of unHoly Rome.
Given all that, TRUTH is a tuff opponent.
SpencerBenedict2nd 5 months ago
@Futureplanet
"Unicorn is a mythical horse-like animal with a SINGLE horn, nothing like an ox."-Futuredunce
>You obviously read too many Brothers Grimm stories & grew up gazing hypnotically at Brothers Hildebrandt fairy-tale posters plastered on your bedroom walls, while you werent playing Dungeons & Dragons w/your butt-buddy's.
It's not been until recently the evidences of its existence have been confirmed by Rosenmuller, "Morgenland, ii. p. 269" & by Prof. Robinson "Calmet, pp. 908, 909."
SpencerBenedict2nd 5 months ago
@Futureplanet
"Unicorn is a mythical horse-like animal with a SINGLE horn, nothing like an ox."-Futuredunce
>The now extinct unicorn was a single horn oxen type animal and this is what's referred to in the Bible, seven times. This is not the modern-day mythical horse creature that flutters around in that wispy brain of yours, silly.
King James Bible
"God brought them out of Egypt; he hath as it were the strength of an unicorn."-Numbers 23-22
The strength of a unicorn - ראם reem is a wild ox.
SpencerBenedict2nd 5 months ago
@SpencerBenedict2nd
"The now extinct unicorn was a single horn oxen type animal and this is what's referred to in the Bible, seven times."
>I did not notice this new assertion of yours, let's see.
-Do you have any evidence on this `Unicorn´, apart from biblical claims?
Any bones, fossils etc?
"This is not the modern-day mythical horse creature that flutters around in that wispy brain of yours, silly."
>No, it's your mythical being, appearing like an oxen.
As usual, you have nothing to show.
ArmaFennica 5 months ago 2
@ArmaFennica "cypress"
SpencerBenedict2nd 5 months ago
@SpencerBenedict2nd
"cypress"
>I'm guessing you somehow think this is an answer... To what exactly?
-You have not been able to present your case with `Cypress´, other than biblical quotes.
-You cannot offer any evidence on your assertion on `Unicorn´.
So what do we have on the premise, made so long ago?
-You could not present yourself in the very first topic.
You even appealed to your deity when met obstacle which you could not go around.
What do we have, then?
-Your assertions, nothing more.
ArmaFennica 5 months ago 3
@ArmaFennica "What do we have, then? -Your assertions, nothing more."-ArmaFoolica
>Yes, but what about the foo dogs? I'm still waiting.
SpencerBenedict2nd 5 months ago
@SpencerBenedict2nd
"Yes, but what about the foo dogs? I'm still waiting."
>Aha. So, you have utterly lost it?
-We have never had any discussions on yor `FooDogs´, so you really can't wait for something which is not real...
While it is clear that you try to "amuse" yourself from the rather deep hole you have dug yourself into, (with all your assertions) this will not work.
Answer plainly, don't try to act like a clown.
ArmaFennica 5 months ago 5
@ArmaFennica I've got a lovely bunch of cocoanuts.
SpencerBenedict2nd 5 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@SpencerBenedict2nd
"I've got a lovely bunch of cocoanuts."
>Yea, you still act like a clown.
-But I went back on your posts, on numerous videos..
You have not been able to present yourself at all, in any field of debate.
On top of all that, failed to answer.
-You use biblical quotes, and few biblical studies to back up your assertions but offer nothing solid, real or studied information.
-Worst of all, you have appealed to your deity on a number of occasions.
so, care to present yourself?
ArmaFennica 5 months ago
SpencerBenedict2nd 5 months ago
@SpencerBenedict2nd WHat about 800 year old men, talking snakes, witches, demons, SpenscerSpazhead.
Well? BenedictBoob? Where is your evidence for those fairytales?
Unicorn is a mythical horse-like animal with a SINGLE horn, nothing like an ox. SpencerShithead.
by the way, is name calling something that gives you comfort? BenedictDickforBrains?
Is the movie "The Hurt Locker" true? It contains historical events (Iraq war). Mentioning any historical event doesn't make fairytales true.
Futureplanet 5 months ago
@Futureplanet
".. there is not a single writer who has alive during the "supposed" life of Jesus that mentioned him."-Futuredunce
>You simply don't know what you are talking about. Stop embarrassing yourself.
-Noah's grandfather Methuselah is historically documented as the longest lived human at 969 years. During the Antediluvian Age, both human and animal life-spans were vastly superior than post-Flood life expectancy due to the catastrophic changes in earths atmosphere and nutrient, silly.
SpencerBenedict2nd 5 months ago
@SpencerBenedict2nd SpencerBrainless, humans CANNOT live to 969. Our telemeres are like an internal genetic clock, and shorten with age. You MUST know this is absurd.
I can give you a new atmosphere in a special chamber for your whole life, I can recreate the conditions, and you must know (unless you are a complete moron) that no person is going to live past 150, even that is pushing it. 969 is complete fairytale material, let alone everything else.
Besides, drowning the world is evil.
Futureplanet 5 months ago
@SpencerBenedict2nd Are you for real? Are you trying to fool me or yourself?
If I can a newborn, put them in a bubble, and exactly recreate the atmosphere (that you claim) and nutrients, that baby will live to 969?
What about telemere shortening? Huh? How do you get around that one wiseman?
What about ice cores from greenland and antartica which tell us about the atmosphere 5000 years ago, which were very similar to today. you complete liar or ignorant religous zealout.
Stop talking crap
Futureplanet 5 months ago 11
@Futureplanet
"What about telemere shortening? Huh? How do you get around that one wiseman?"-Futuredunce
>There's nothing to get around, but it does supply support for the jesuit evolution theory hoax being complete bunkum as everything is slowly breaking down over time and loosing information and never gaining new.
SpencerBenedict2nd 5 months ago
@Futureplanet
"What about ice cores from greenland and antartica which tell us about the atmosphere 5000 years ago, which were very similar to today."-Futuredunce
>At least your very close on the "5000 years" age part, for the fact that the polar ice caps were a consequence of the catastrophic historic 2348 B.C. Deluge Event. So a more accurate figure would be 4,360 years ago.
And hence, the ice core "atmospheric" sample similarities are due to being post-Flood, silly.
What else you got?
SpencerBenedict2nd 5 months ago
@Futureplanet
"The bible is truth? Give me one piece of evidence that the bible is true. You have none."-Futuredork
3. “Discovery after discovery has established the accuracy of innumerable details, and brought increased recognition to the value of the Bible as a source of history.” - William F. Albright, American archaeologist and educator known for his excavations of biblical sites, 1891-1971
SpencerBenedict2nd 5 months ago
@Futureplanet
"The bible is truth? Give me one piece of evidence that the bible is true. You have none."-Futuredork
2. "It may be stated categorically that no archaeological discovery has ever controverted a Biblical reference. Scores of archaeological findings (over 25,000) have been made which confirm in clear outline or exact detail historical statements in the Bible. And, by the same token, proper evaluation of Biblical descriptions has often led to amazing discoveries."
-Dr. Nelson Glueck
SpencerBenedict2nd 5 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@Futureplanet
"The bible is truth? Give me one piece of evidence that the bible is true. You have none."-Futuredork
1. "I know of no finding in archaeology that`s properly confirmed which is in opposition to the Scriptures. The Bible is the most accurate history textbook the world has ever seen."
-Dr Clifford Wilson, director of the Australian Institute of Archaeology
SpencerBenedict2nd 5 months ago
Science = Theory
Bible = Not theory
-----
is it to hard to understand, if it cannot be backed by evidence = not a fact.
Nothing in the bible is signed by god almighty, but humans. The only word written by god himself is the 10 commandments.
roffpoff 5 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@roffpoff ... The only word written by god himself is the 10 commandments ...
If that's true then is it: Thou shall not "KILL" or thou shall not "MURDER?"
DarwinsFriend 5 months ago
@roffpoff ... Science = Theory ...
Powered flight: 1890 = Theory / Wright Brothers: credited with inventing and building the world's first successful airplane and making the first controlled, powered and sustained heavier-than-air human flight, on December 17, 1903 = No Longer Theory.
Physical reality of flight based on the theory that air travels at a differing speed over the top of a curved wing than it does the lower, flat surface of the wing - unlike what occurs in the flight of a bird.
DarwinsFriend 5 months ago
Why are christians so afraid of evolution =? Evolution means that gods creations can adapt to their environment ... this makes them MORE perfect. In fact by denying this they deny the perfection in gods creation. EVolution is adaption from information in your envirment. Lift something heavy , you got stronger! God is creating here and now.
roffpoff 5 months ago
@roffpoff ... this makes them MORE perfect ...
Not necessarily. That ignores the reality of extinction. If they were "perfect" they wouldn't go extinct.
DarwinsFriend 5 months ago
@DarwinsFriend But if they could not adapt , would not they go extinct much faster ?
roffpoff 5 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@roffpoff If they were all - down to their very last molecule - created by the Father of Jesus, who was / is / and shall forever be PERFECT, how could they?
And exactly how did we end up with 400,000 species of beetles? Did the Lord have some kind of a strange bug fetish - or did the little buggers evolve AFTER Noah and his Big Boat to Turkey?
DarwinsFriend 5 months ago
And who said species should not go extinct. Animals are not separate from nature , they are the nature itself, and nature is always changing. If not some species could disappear other new species could not take their place in the system.
roffpoff 5 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@roffpoff ... And who said species should not go extinct ...
If you believe the Holy Bible - you did, as there was no death prior to Adam & Eve's FALL.
All the animal life that went extinct and laid down a fossil record prior shows evidence that the Lord allowed them to perish, no? If dinosaurs didn't inhabit the fringes of the Garden of Eden - eating ONLY plant life - when humans were first there, of course.
See how ridiculously stupid Bible interpretation and fantasizing can get.
DarwinsFriend 5 months ago
antichristconspiracy cont.
Wow. That's quite a fetish you've got there. You over-reacted and made all those entries based on that site. You again reinforced my perspective that you can't actually function on your own and are simply a regurgitating drone.
You have my sympathy, SpencerBenedict2nd. Please seek mental help.
DarwinsFriend 5 months ago 4
@fonna How can you see good without the evil(we see by contrasts). Satan is just as important as god, because he shows you the other side. God made satan , since he made everything, What is free will without chose? You always harvest the fruits of your choosing anyway. That how i have understood it , im happily non religious.
roffpoff 5 months ago
@Draugh39 do you mean , they walked by themselves ?
roffpoff 5 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@roffpoff
"do you mean , they walked by themselves ?"
Which post are you refering to?
Draugh39 5 months ago
The planet’s deepest ocean trench is 36,168 feet deep.
That’s equivalent to 2,252,543.040 pounds of pressure per square foot at the bottom of that 6.85 mile deep water column.
Added to the water that was already there Pre-Flood, that works out to be a total of 4,066,014 pounds per square foot at the depth of 13.35 miles – from the surface of the water to the bottom of a known trench.
Isn’t The Lord truly wonderful?
(makes me wonder why there aren't fields of diamonds down there!)
DarwinsFriend 5 months ago 7
All the mountains on Earth were covered with the waters of “The Flood”, including Mt. Everest – at over 29,000 feet in elevation above sea level.
That column of water had to weigh about 1,813,470 pounds – per cubic foot, as one cubic foot weighs 62.428 pounds.
That's simply physical reality. 5,000 years ago, or 3 seconds ago.
That's just the way it is. (sorry)
That's 12,593.548 pounds of pressure - per square inch - at the bottom of that column. That's the weight of (3) Cadillac cars.
DarwinsFriend 5 months ago 7