I had a customer that came in and had a flat plate that we cut for them recently and he wanted to make a "minor" change. he wanted to shift all the cutouts over 1.5" this amounted to over 40 cutouts. I had 3 options in Solid Edge. 1) go into each cutout and add 1.5" to the horizontal dimension. 2) within the history based features move all the faces 1.5" at one time 3) use ST to move all the features at once I did all of them and ST was easiest and fastest its about understanding what works best
Solid Works/ Waste leases parasolid kernel from siemens which owns and develops this kernel ... Solid Edge is siemens baby .. SW's direct editing is sketch driven ... Solid edge directly interact with the model... I know your marketing team rock's ..
I don't recall this AE mentioning that Siemens and Solid Edge own the Parasolids file that drives the Solid Works Software. Solid Works leases the parasolids file from Siemens Corp. Hmmmmm....For the same money...Why wouldn't you want the option of Solid Edge's Synchronous Technology. Have your cake and eat it too.
Absolutely no comparison. This is an attempt by Solid Works to discredit the time saving power of Solid Edge with Synchronous Technology. Why would anyone want to spend hours vs minutes in constructing a model? Give us a break. This video is an ad for Solid Edge if anyone with a brain watches it.
An experienced Solid Works Tech. admits that Solid Edge With ST would aid in the speed of making these changes. All you need to do is watch and see how long it takes this Solid Works Jockey to pick all the necessary related components and for the model to update...What he failed to mention is that if you don't pick every related feature, the model will fail and that the software will crash....In "Solid Edge" this move only takes 1 sec and 1 face only needs to be selected! Solid Edge Rules!
I had a customer that came in and had a flat plate that we cut for them recently and he wanted to make a "minor" change. he wanted to shift all the cutouts over 1.5" this amounted to over 40 cutouts. I had 3 options in Solid Edge. 1) go into each cutout and add 1.5" to the horizontal dimension. 2) within the history based features move all the faces 1.5" at one time 3) use ST to move all the features at once I did all of them and ST was easiest and fastest its about understanding what works best
vipergrim 5 months ago
Solid Works/ Waste leases parasolid kernel from siemens which owns and develops this kernel ... Solid Edge is siemens baby .. SW's direct editing is sketch driven ... Solid edge directly interact with the model... I know your marketing team rock's ..
gillvincy 2 years ago
It's very funny to watch this and then a Solid Edge ST video.
There's lost time, and a steeper learning curve with SW
QSQCaito 2 years ago
I don't recall this AE mentioning that Siemens and Solid Edge own the Parasolids file that drives the Solid Works Software. Solid Works leases the parasolids file from Siemens Corp. Hmmmmm....For the same money...Why wouldn't you want the option of Solid Edge's Synchronous Technology. Have your cake and eat it too.
azzato3 3 years ago
Yes, In conclusion....
Absolutely no comparison. This is an attempt by Solid Works to discredit the time saving power of Solid Edge with Synchronous Technology. Why would anyone want to spend hours vs minutes in constructing a model? Give us a break. This video is an ad for Solid Edge if anyone with a brain watches it.
azzato3 3 years ago
Comment removed
azzato3 3 years ago
An experienced Solid Works Tech. admits that Solid Edge With ST would aid in the speed of making these changes. All you need to do is watch and see how long it takes this Solid Works Jockey to pick all the necessary related components and for the model to update...What he failed to mention is that if you don't pick every related feature, the model will fail and that the software will crash....In "Solid Edge" this move only takes 1 sec and 1 face only needs to be selected! Solid Edge Rules!
azzato3 3 years ago