I'm not an acoustician. This was a great concept, and maybe with proper mike placement or something, it could have challenged Barenboim/Solti. Still, "A" for effort
What a delight to hear one of my favorite pieces of music extended to include other music makers. I say Bravo to the players and also to Hallwaypro for sharing. Thanks
it was "raw" but it was simply beautiful. in tune (for the most part), rhythmic and to see young people of so many diverse backgrounds contributing to something so beautiful...it is simply breathtaking. thank you very much for uploading this.
i agree with newbiguy. no orchestra in the original score. i was shocked that there are two conductors. whow! there must be one conductor. an orchestra conductor can also conduct the choir too for an orchestra and choral piece.
There is no choral in this work. It's just for orchestra.
There is however a stunning choral arrangement made of this work, named "lux eterna".
I agree, it's much too fast.
But even then, the theme is so beatiful, whatever you make of it, it keeps its beauty.
By the way, recognise the theme of Beethoven's pathetique? Elgar used it because of his dedication to his friend Jaeger. In German jaeger means hunter, that's why the piece is called Nimrod (which is the name the mythical hunter).
is this a professional band?
GoRollTide1 8 months ago
two directors with two different conducting styles....fail
10ccsoccer 1 year ago
I'm not an acoustician. This was a great concept, and maybe with proper mike placement or something, it could have challenged Barenboim/Solti. Still, "A" for effort
sagalat 3 years ago
its toooo fast
rebekahpape123 3 years ago 7
Yer i agree its to fast and doesent sound the same
doormouse1990 3 years ago
What a delight to hear one of my favorite pieces of music extended to include other music makers. I say Bravo to the players and also to Hallwaypro for sharing. Thanks
yamaho5 3 years ago
it was "raw" but it was simply beautiful. in tune (for the most part), rhythmic and to see young people of so many diverse backgrounds contributing to something so beautiful...it is simply breathtaking. thank you very much for uploading this.
fliboi78 3 years ago
This is... in a word... painful.
DeafeningHorn 3 years ago
My band sightread better than this. We're playing it this year, and I have first part clarinet and the whole band sounded better than this.
bboo88 4 years ago
Elgar would turn in his grave if he heard this shambles
thewritingroom 4 years ago
omigash. my mistake. i on my first comment. i mean that no choir in the original score for enigma variations.
1672 4 years ago
and also there is no piano part in this piece.
1672 4 years ago
i agree with newbiguy. no orchestra in the original score. i was shocked that there are two conductors. whow! there must be one conductor. an orchestra conductor can also conduct the choir too for an orchestra and choral piece.
1672 4 years ago
At the time given for rehearsal and the space provided...having two conductors was unavoidable.
hallwaypro 4 years ago
for me, this is not a good excuse. it is the job of the conductor to guide the group of musicians.
1672 2 years ago
There is no choral in this work. It's just for orchestra.
There is however a stunning choral arrangement made of this work, named "lux eterna".
I agree, it's much too fast.
But even then, the theme is so beatiful, whatever you make of it, it keeps its beauty.
By the way, recognise the theme of Beethoven's pathetique? Elgar used it because of his dedication to his friend Jaeger. In German jaeger means hunter, that's why the piece is called Nimrod (which is the name the mythical hunter).
newbiguy 4 years ago
haha we are playing this too :D its absolutely stunning...
RomoGreenEyez05 4 years ago
Is this the choral version included?
LilCease912 4 years ago
Is it me or are they playing it too fast here?
waxojacko 5 years ago
agreed, it should be a much slower tempo.
musicaltragedy 4 years ago
we're playing this in full orchestra right now, it's a LOVELY piece
BarbaroForever 5 years ago