bible is fake-what if there was other human exactly like us in other universe....what if the bible is just made up by ppl and keep changing it...oh and i heard the bible from christian says that jesus doesnt really love u.....he just sparing u for the war...
I believe this might answer the question about how 1 of posibly many or endless amounts of universes (can you say that?) that exsist. But I don't believe this answers the question of EXSISTANCE... this says there was something before us, how did that get there? what made that tiny particle? there for it must have been a higher being. And I believe this higher being is God.
@SyThco13 , Then you don't know the answer, but you believe God creates everything? So he 's a creation or just an imagination of your mind? My question was If God creates everything then who created him? Where he comes from? Who creates the entity who created God? Believing is NOT the answer. Faith is not an answer neither. Just because science doesn't have the answer, that doesn't make religion correct in their belief. Believe in God without a sciencetific proof has created conflicts in human
@calvintrainer1212 Look, I'm no religious fanatic, I just think theres a higher being and IT created everything we understand. the universe, and the phenomenon of life is too strange for just coming out of nothing! I believe sicence, ( a tool man uses to understand things) will prove there is a higher being, and then I will know my FAITH has been in the right spot the whole time.
@calvintrainer1212 And by the way the belief of God did nothing to people, but man abused this "Great Idea" to forage power, thus giving us conflict through out history.
@SyThco13, Fair enough, Bible says earth was created around several 1000 years old . Some stars takes 1 millions years just get there traveling at light speed. The solid evident is earth at least 5 billions years old. What part of that people couldn't connect to make up their mind? Some pyramids are older than the age of earth according to the bible's estimate of its age
@calvintrainer1212 So your one of those people? Your not suppose to take the bilbe litterally, if you study the bible the first thing you need to know is that you must take it symbolisticly other wise it wouldn't make sense. I Believe the bible like the coran (or how ever its spelled) was completely altered to fit the needs as of means to have power over people. You see this in acent Rome, in the witch trials and other things. If you want to believe that there is no omious being thats you bro.
@calvintrainer1212 But don't have a closed mind or you won't really learn much passed the limitations of your prejudice. ( not saying your f-ed up just the blockades of your mind)
@SyThco13 , Religion is a form of brain washing to control people. Belief turns people into sheeps. Contradict to what your said, I open my mind to vastness of the universal, unlimited by earth bound idealology that's over 2000 years old and out of date. To a sheep the master could be a dog that steer it. Because the sheep doesn't know any better. The sheep is limited by it knowledge hence a dog can control it . Just because you don't understand something don't "blame" it on your imaginary god
@SyThco13 Wrll man, believe what you want I'm tired of flaming and I know what I know. To really expain ANYTHING of this caliber would be vertually impossible... at least in this life time have a good one bro think about it, and don't down people for there beliefs. Its beautiful if you have a faith thats all I could really say.
In the Qur'an, which was revealed fourteen centuries ago at a time when the science of astronomy was still primitive, the expansion of the universe was described in the following terms: And it is We Who have constructed the heaven with might, and verily, it is We Who are steadily expanding it.(Qur'an,51:47)
Do not the unbelievers see that the heavens and the Earth were sewn together and then We unstitched them and that We made from water every living thing? So will they not believe? (Qur'21:30)
So if we were at one of the stars at the edge of our observable sphere, we would then have a different sphere of observable universe? Because I was always told that the universe folded in on itself, thus everything we see would be seen by everything else in the universe.
However, the video showed a much bigger universe, with only a small portion being our observable universe. Is the universe infinite with different regions seeing different things?
@peronkop right right i know that. I meant something else.
I'll put it another way. Let's say that our universe is centered at Iowa and we are only able to see the continental United States, so that is our observable universe. I'm asking if we were transported to a different part of the universe, would we be able to see different parts of the universe, like being in Montana where now we can see Canada?
@wes5020 Yeah thats is also true. We would probably have a new observable universe. If Im correct the entire universe stretch far, far, far beyond what we can see. Our observable universe could be the size of an atom compared to the real deal.
The best way to visualize the universe is to imagine the Universe to be a giant blob of dough with raisins spread throughout it. The raisons represent galaxies and the dough represents space itself. When the dough is placed in the oven it begins to expand thus the distance between galaxies gets bigger as time goes on.
If you travelled far enough through space by the speed of light, you would eventually see a new set of stars. You will have moved in the direction of a new stars thus suddenly see new light. But you will have also moved in the direction of dead stars thus suddenly not see the light that you used to see.
The universe isn't infinite but it is expanding. The big bang was an explosion of space, not an explosion of matter in space. You need to visualize it to understand it.
Very cool video. Even with my heavy math background in Electrical Engineering, I still find some of the quantum and relativity principles to be mind bending. But in the end, it really is just mental masturbation. What matters is not the space outside of us, but inside of us. Overcoming internal loneliness, ignorance, intolerance, and caring for one another... since the likelihood of finding any aliens diminishes ever sec... is the most vital thing in this age. But I enjoy the fruits of research
@ofosusam having been atheist before I can tell you science has more to learn from some religions than those religions from science. In China they are modernizing fast and getting rid of religion/tradition... and in Tibet millions of Chinese migrate there because the modern world has no meaning. It takes both to understand the deeper Truths of the world. The one problem with atheism is it supposes "because I cannot find it, it must not exist." That is not science. Not in the least.
@TheShadowlin what are deeper truths? evidence, like science? or fuzzy feelings like religion advertizes? No, your quote above does not represent atheism at all. If we dont know, we accept we are lacking knowledge and need to research it. religion says "I dont know so gods did it". If it still does not add up they say "well we believe on faith". science is based on evidence, atheism is based on rational thought. not knowing to atheists means more hard work ahead.
@TheShadowlin - contuation - . So we are still trying to prove gods, so far no evidence. so we are inclined to dismiss the idea. Just like you would dismiss it if I keep telling you I put a million dollars in your bank, but yoru online banking says you have a balance of 200. At some point you would dismiss it and think I am crazy. Would that be due to faith or the lack of evidnce? or would there be a deeper truth behind it bcos I dont know the ingredients to manufacture money? religion is bunk
@ofosusam Yes, no evidence of those anthropomorphic gods that have been designed in the mind of man, though when I use the term I am referring to a much more naturalistic deity, one that satisfies all conditions of the known and unknown universe, and that mysterious time we call the future unknowable. I am a Panentheist and find life and the natural world fascinating but I am still confounded as to why people can not see that the religious institutions have caused so much pain and destruction
@StephenWebb1980 In-so-far as truth is concerned, I see it as nothing more than a constant emerging from a system with rules that are indicative of its own self evidence. In math, the language of science, we have rules that tell us 2+2=4, that truth is pretty evident but only because the rules we have devised make it so. Anytime I hear someone say they have the truth, I ask them to explain and almost never do I hear any sensible answer. I think the definition I posted above is a damn good one
QAT explains this as a continuous act of creation. We look far away to see the past reduced to a point (just as we can form our mathematics). We look very close into the void or atom to see the process of creation taking place at all points in the spherical universe (just a we can form our mathematics). In this sense the big bang exists as our observable infinite past and quantum reality exists as our possible very near futures. A sort of recursive process of expanding spherical light waves. :)
ever really know these things. 1st Q = Where did the stuff come from FIRST? READ THIS i dont really have any faith in any religion right now so this is not about god or my stance on any theories. I dont really think i have any just my own thoughts. I dont admit to most people that i'm not sure if i belive in any god or any religion. I'm even kinda ashamed to say this to you all now. These are what I myself belive to be facts. Man has always wanted a creator for these reasons.
@joshuaadamcox dude dont be ashamed that you dont know what to believe, thats probably one of the best stances you can have right now, to admit you could be wrong. Thats roughly where I am too. I hate it when I see people state things as fact that they couldnt possibly know.
@joshuaadamcox It did not come from anything, it always was. But the presence of Mind consummated it by giving it form and name, or else it would have no form. This essence of Mind of of fractal math indicates that God is superstructure of conscience, the dimensions and shape we have not yet found a way to detect. However there are many things science is aware of but cannot find proof of with a microscope. cont'd
At any rate the superstructure's formation spontaeously while providing definition to space-time suggests that God did not create the Universe but IS the Universe. The unknown energy quantified by Mind (we have no current way of calculating) operates in strange ways. For instance we can share data but still Relativity oft bends our interpretations. So even when we describe God as this superstructure it tells us little because we cannot know the way to interpret that much data simultaneously.
However we can make a small controlled experiment out of our own lives. In effect, using an individual - like a baby - to see how the Universe forms. When an infant is born, it rapidly expands and then starts to learn names. Before this period, all things are as One nameless blob. The first knowing is mom, dad, and food/water. Then more things and more things dividing forever until old age, dementia, and death.
The current theory is that the Universe dissipates as expansion occurs. Like life, faster and faster each day, becoming more confusing and difficult to make connections. Soon one's own "world" seems far removed from others - which is why coupling and mating is important to avoid loneliness (IMO). But at the end, all of it blends back into the Void.
So it would seem likely in the cycle of things that God, too, must dissipate with the Universe, at least until the coupling occurs again. But...
the topic of universal reincarnation is to most theoretical, though they are trying to find evidence of existence before the Big Bang. It seems unlikely we will .. but hey since one can meditate and through dream-like trance revisit oneself in past lives, well I suppose science may one day find a way to revisit past Universes. It's all unimportant unless you make lessons from it. What this stuff tells me is life is short: love early and long, and don't hold on too hard It All is slippery stuff.
I dont think we can actually know this... I dont have any better ideas or id be posting a video and not a comment... I'm not asking this next question because of any faith in any religion before im done im prob going to wind up asking alot of them that i hope if any of you have an idea about id APPRECIATE you sharing with me because i would love to hear others ideas to my questions... I'm not even going to pretend i understand everything explained in this video but i still dont think we could
After watching this i decided to masturbate to compensate my lack of understanding ...but then again... after a while i thought to myself Im still better than those that sell drugs and cares about blings blings more than the super nova or black holes... as the result am proud of myself again...but not as much as before i watched this document.
@nonbutone Shut up. Astrophysics has no room for those that believe in fairy tales. Congrats, you pointed out a fraction of what the Quran says. You left out the many parts about how inferior women are to men thus giving Islamic men the "right" to rape women who don't dress "modestly". Let's not forget about the part that says a female captive of war has every right to be raped.
@iz2sicc fairenough, but tell your astrophysics friends to stop bragging about just discovering that the earth is expanding discovered with their 'High tech' equipment.. We knew this 1433 years ago without any telescopes.
Show me the part where the quran says "Islamic men the right to rape women who don't dress modestly". On the contrary rapists must be stoned to death, but you show me where its says that. We are looking forward to it.
@nonbutone quran 33:50 lawful to you are your wives and your slave girls allah has given you as booty. quran 4:24 forbidden to you are wedded wives of other people except those who have fallen in your hands as prisoners of war. quran 23:5-6 who restrain their carnal desires except with their wives and slave girls, for these are lawful to them. they are to many like this to list.
@iz2sicc nice try buddy. Where in those verses did it say we are allowed to rape any women?? Why didnt you complete v 33:50 where it continues by saying Lawful to you are "prisoners of war whom Allah has assigned to you; AND daughters of ur paternal and maternal uncles and aunts ... and any believing woman "
OH so we are allowed to rape any of those women?? LOL this is what happens when an silly ignorant person does a quick Google search looking for a quick way to suit his negativity
@nonbutone Apparently you lack comprehension. I put "right" in quotations for a reason. The criminal Islamic (I'm singling out the bad guys, not all Islamic men) men use their religion as an excuse for raping western women for dressing like "whores". Also, when scripture tells you that wedded wives are forbidden except those that are prisoners of war, it's pretty obvious that it's describing your right to have sexual relations with that slave. I'm guessing the slave won't be willing so yes, RAPE
@nonbutone You can play semantics all you want, but I'm still confident that you're intelligent enough to realize that, that particular entry is talking about the right to rape a female slave that you obtained from war. I mean come on bro... if a president was writing that same line into legislation, would you still think that it is not talking about raping a slave of war? I know the only reason that you defend such scripture is because of your religion. Outside of that, you'd think it's wrong.
@nonbutone Furthermore, what's wrong with Googling for information? Are suggesting that you do not Google to obtain information for other purposes? I think the Google argument is a cop out. There are a lot of bad sources on the Internet no doubt. However, scholarly articles, passages from religious sites themselves, etc.. are all credible sources. So let's not play the childish, "Oh, you Googled it. Good job broski" game. Your bible and things on Google were all written/typed by humans.
@nonbutone I'll believe that Islam does not treat women like trash when Islam allows all of the beautiful Arab women to dress freely. I'll believe that Islam treats women fairly when I see the majority of Arab men who rape western women stop using the excuse of "They were dressed like whores so they asked for it. I'm protected because of my religion". Seriously, why do you live your life blinded by a book that was written with the hands of men? Jupiter is in the sky right now. Science is beauty.
@iz2sicc bit diff to a verse that says If U get cought raping a girl U pay her daddy $50 Dollars and you MUST marry her NERVER ever divorce her ay.. (Bible Deute 22-28:29)
Regards womens dress, this is why jesus said if you look at a women lustfully then PLUCK Ur eyes and throw them away!! (mathew 5:28)
This is why your bible says in 1 Corrinthians 11:3-6 'Cover your hair or it must be SHAVED OFF'
Mat 7 1:2 "Why do you judge? For in the same way you judge others, U will be judged"
@nonbutone Why are you throwing Christian scripture at me as if I think it's any more ridiculous than the Quran scripture? Sorry, I do no discriminate when it comes to my unbelief in religion.
@nonbutone By the way, although Christians have these scripture that you quote, they lack extremists that follow it dangerously. I'm speaking in comparative terms with Islamic extremists. Suicide bombers and beheadings... In modern day, an extreme Christian is the likes of West Boro. Maybe a cult leader that charismatically leads people to suicide. But if you bring up past history, I won't argue that Christians have probably committed far worse.
“If a man meets a virgin , and seizes her(forces) and lies with her, and they are found, then the man who lay with her shall give to the father of the young woman fifty shekels of silver, and she shall be his wife, because he has violated her. He may not divorce her all his days."
So because he raped her he has to pay her day $50 and she cannot divorce him.. LOL lovely
A couple of things in the vid deserve some elaboration. Objects bound by forces, like the earth in orbit about the sun, do not expand. But the expansion of space does have a tiny static influence upon the size of the earth's orbit. A tiny fraction of an inch, so small that we cannot measure the difference. Also the history of objects with a current redshift of 1.8 will be visible to us for billions of years. But we'll never see anything that happens to them beyond what happened to them today.
Humm ... two trains moving away from eachother do not influence eachothers speed. You could calculate the growing distance between the objects, but without a static point of reference, you cant say anything about the speed of the individual objects. Nothing is able to travel faster then the speed of light. But two objects moving at exactly the speed of light in opposite directions will give an observer on either of those objects the idea that the other object moves faster then the speed of light
@PlanetJeroen " But two objects moving at exactly the speed of light in opposite directions will give an observer on either of those objects the idea that the other object moves faster then the speed of light"
Errrm, no, that is completely wrong and misses the whole point about things moving through space-time rather than space.
@PlanetJeroen Actually, only things with no mass can move at the speed of light so there could never be an observer on board but if we use 0.9 speed of light instead (relative to some arbitrary inertial object), then each object would measure that the other was moving at 0.9944 the speed of light. The apparent mismatch in adding up speeds is resolved by each one also measuring that time appears to be running slowly for the other object.
@chrisofnottingham If they move away from eachother, there is no way in hell they will measure 0.9944 ... and be able to call it accurate. You are referring to the 1 static, one @ speed of light scenario I think. Then time slows down depending on where you observe .. quite sure of that tbh.
@PlanetJeroen You weren't. When you say "two objects moving at C" it implies an independent frame of reference. In fact there is no independent frame of reference in space, all motion is only relative (Relativity geddit?!!) so you have to introduce one. In fact in the special case of C you don't need to because one of the results of relativity is that ALL observers measure all objects moving at C as moving at C relative to themselves, even if the observers have relative motion too.
...With no frame of reference it is generally pointless to talk about adding velocities between 2 objects because there aren't two velocities, there is only the relative velocity between them in the first place. The very act of mentioning two speeds for two objects implies a reference frame centred on a third party and that is what the equation for non linear adding of velocities at relativistic speeds covers. In everyday life, our reference frame is usually the surface of the Earth.
@chrisofnottingham No, it does not. I gave a situation where the ovserved speed, while on either of the objects, would be bigger then C, while in all actuality, nothing would travel faster then C. Then you came in to correct me. Read back, you'll see what I mean ;)
"Nothing is able to travel faster then the speed of light. But two objects moving at exactly the speed of light in opposite directions *****will give an observer on either of those objects the idea that the other object moves faster then the speed of light*****"
That is just plain wrong, as any undergrad in physics will tell you.
If an object moves at C it moves at C with respect to all objects, include other objects moving a C in other directions...
@PlanetJeroen Any kind of understanding of relativity, as distinct from parrot fashion learning, is really hard to achieve. IMHO the biggest stumbling block is really embracing that there is no absolute frame of reference in space. The moment we draw a diagram we fool ourselves into making a framework. This in itself isn't so bad but later when you try to deal with time and space dilation the thing that often trips you up is reverting to thinking in terms of an absolute speed or position.
@chrisofnottingham Well .. atm I'm trying to wrap my head around how 2 objects moving at near-C away from eachother will only see the other as moving at near-C... once I got that again, I'll probably find that I still dont understand it :p
@PlanetJeroen I think the best approach is to accept that C is an absolute limit, just because it has been measured to be true. Then look at what has to give way in order for that to be maintained. And what has to give is that relatively moving observers disagree about the distance and time between any two events. Distance shouldn't be too bad to grasp because each sees themselves as stationary. Then time "has to" dilate to keep the numbers right, and that is pretty hard to take.
... the only problem being that at the full value of C an "observer" would experience all journeys as taking zero time anyway. Which is why it is less confusing to deal with 0.9C but either way no observer ever sees anything happening at 2C (other than due to expansion of space).
"Why isn't the universe expanding in particles to?"
Because at small scales other (attracting) forces are stronger than the force of expansion: the weak and strong atomic forces, electromagnetic force, and gravity. The force of expansion dominates only at scales larger than super clusters of galaxies.
One question comes to my mind... Why isn't the universe expanding in particles to ? I mean, the space between electron and nucleus should expand to...
They keep saying they are so close to the "Theory of Everything" as if it's going to be something simple. But as your well aware the more and more we have expanded our knowledge of Physics, the more complicated it has gotten. It's like every time we find something new it answers part of a question, but brings up several new questions. And when things like the Uncertainty Principle, you have to ask - how do we really know what we know, and if it works?
@tropickman Test them, where in labs, facilities, on computers, with atom smashers sure yea it works in these places but we don't really see how these things work at an exact moment in the universe so tell me again how you know these things work?
@Acrimonator I would expect someone as redundant as you would rather try and answer my question then go with something as simple as calling me a troll.
And yet, we can see, we can visualize the ethereal matter. The scheme to one device for to visualize the ethereal matter: EXIST! And this device it can realize!
The UNIFIED LAW is the LAW of the UNIVERSAL ATTRACTION FORCES= of the GRAVITATIONAL INTERACTION FORCES = of the ELECTROMAGNETIC FIELD FORCES produced by the inner movement of the inertial rotation of the ethereal matter from bodies and substances. This, because, the ethereal particles are in continuous movement through the them nature, being electrical – produce electrical energy, being named and electrogenic particles.
Thus, all the physics's laws, chemistry's laws and biology's laws it can include and explain through this unified law of the electromagnetic field produced of inner movement of inertial rotation of the matter from bodies and substances. The spacial brethren say us about Newton that: "Newton is great saint with us in Sky!"
The unified law of Newton will throw at rubbish Einstein’s relativity, with Big bang, black holes, singularity and holes of worm. With these methaphysical theories and animation about absorption the Eartn or Sun it destroy logical thinking and reason at man. With this dissiness enter man in terrestrial life, and no more believe that he has a future. Result thus blocking of the society, which lead at general corruption of society and at her sodominess and dissoluteness.
The UNIVERSAL ATTRACTION LAW it apply identically to the movement the atoms of the ethereal matters, identically to the movement the atoms of the chemical elements, identically to the movement the planets and stars of the one galaxy, because any body of any dimension possess a mass and thus is subdued the newtonian forces of interaction.
The universal attraction law of the Newton is the UNIFIED LAW because all those three fundamental interactions: the nuclear interaction, the electromagnetic(electron-proto¬n) interaction and the gravitational interaction are interactions produced through the ethereal matter, what bind the classical physics of the good part of the modern physics, but it bind and the ETHEREAL PHYSICS.
Any will be the couple of material bodies, the newtonian system contain the idea that a force of attraction unite them, that they are attracts one towards the other of this proportional force with the multiplied the masses, and reverse proportional with the square of the distance which separate them.
All those three principles of the dynamics: the inertia's principle, the principle the proportionality of the acceleration with the force and the principle of the action and reaction - are essential elements of the universal attraction law; which in essence is a law of the inertial mass in motion.
The “GRAVITY” is a radiation and an electromagnetic quadripolar field between two bodies. The gravity is not a chemical fixed bound, but is an elastic bound, which accompanys all those four states of aggregation of the matter: solid, liquid, gaseous and ethereal.
The INERTIAL MOVE from matter produce the gravitational field, and the gravity with her particles ties the macrocosmos with microcosmos and influenced all what exists sitting thus at the general existence basis. The UNIFIED LAW of matter's forces I can say with cetainly that it exists from some hundred years and is Newton's universal attraction law.
Isaac Newton establishes the basic notion of classical mechanics, proved the universal attraction law and put base of the celestial mechanics. Newton had affirmed that it hasn't existed natural process who hasn't produced by attraction and repulsion active forces which regulates the celestial bodies movement and the bodies faling down,that leeds the chemical and mechanical processes, fact which makes that the universal attraction law acts as in macrocosmos and as in microcosmos.
In the zone collisions and explosion starry, from the primary matter - matter under electrical field, magnetic field and radiations form, it begins to form the underatomic particles; first the electron which remain as crystallisation nucleus definitized on him the neutron, which at that time when becomes free oneself is transformed in proton and electron, respective in atoms of hydrogen, giving immenses hydrogen clouds what finds on the starry cataclysms place.
In an atom, the peripherical big speed at so little radius are proof that every particle or group of particles can create continuously a personal magnetic field in which floats and which permit them an inertial rotation movement without rapid lesses, as a celestial body in cosmical space.For example, the medium's density at 200 miles above Earth is so small, that if Jupiter it will turn in this medium 1000000 years, then Jupiter will lose not to millionth part from his motion!
Thus two bodies in interaction creates between them a magnetic depresion what constitute the attraction force between bodies. In a similar mode it can construct the magnetic fields schedule for a helium atom in which we have: 1).-the magnetic field created by the nucleus; 2).-the electromagnetic field created between an electron and a proton; 3).-the gravitational electromagnetic field of the atom, field what is absorbed of atom and is accelerated by the electromagnetic field.
Thus the viscous material from the central zone can get only through a certain extremity, evolving around the particle or further away in space from where it turns by the other extremity of the particle. The inertial movement working of the underatomic particles and the atoms as whole permits them to compare with the powerful ASPIRATORS which absorbs, but its emits too matter under the form of magnetic field's particles.
Loops which at the substraction of rotation speed are retiring, and at growth rotation speed, evolves around the particle and enter through the other end forming a continuously mass circulation of primary matter from the central zone. The external's part of the particle by friction with the medium become a spherical surface, and in the inner share where continuous the crystallisation it will obtain an uniformly waved surface, with helicoidal channels disposed around his axis.
The general schedule of existence of any underatomic particle is a schedule to one sphere with central section on the rotation vertical axis of the particle in which we have: 1).-the carcass resulting by the radially crystallisation, from external to internal; 2).-the viscous inner mass; 3).-inner helicoid channel disposed around the axis, resulted in the last carcass crystallisation; 4).-magnetic field loops or primary viscous mass loops from the central zone.
How the solidification begins from external it would resultated that in the central zone at any underatomic particles would remained continuously a primary matter mass, more viscous, so that to the shown rotations the free underatomic particles, or in the atom's frame, to take out in space matter from the central zone, but on which to it recover continuously for maintaining the them integrity.
The atoms, the underatomic particles, the radiations - all to be possible to crystallize at highter temperature. Continuing so we arrive to the gravitational field particles whose characteristics: rapid movement, great power of penetration and reciprocal attraction proves that they also can be composed.
The existence of the rotation motion in macrocosmos and in microcosmos, and the great temperature interval from zero Kelvin degrees at millions of degrees in stars, guide us attention towards the inertial masses in motion and towards the matter's crystallisation phenomenons. Naturally, the crystallisation bigins from external(from periphery) and advances towards the central zone. The bodies and substances known by man, are crystallizing between 0...4000 Kelvin degrees.
Mendeleev had shown that we can not conceive without motion even the smallest matter particle. It says about radiations but about atoms and molecules that they have a vibration frequency of approximate 10 at 13 …10 at 15 what means that these are turning arround theirs self axes with 10 at 13 …10 at 15 rotations on second proofing the existence of a continuous inertial motion .
Our brethren from ITER have capacity of to construct controlled thermonuclear reactor, only that they must let abandon tokamak installation.Because that the tokamak installation were invented in 1950 by phisicists Igor Tamm and Andrei Sakharov, inspired by idea of Oleg Lavrentyev, when he studiing the realization of the hydrogen bomb which it has not need of magnetic trap, and thus all experiments were finished with destructuion of the tokamak installations in the central zone.
As following of the thermonuclear reaction from Sun, the Sun is a giant powerstation of electromagnetic energy, a powerfull source of electricity which keep up the life of every where from his planetary system.This electrical ether which come from Sun, we gather him with our electrical generators and drive our industry. This electrical ether is absorbed and of the our bodies and of any creature, - electrical ether which keep and animate the our existence.
The electrical ether- for example- proceed from magnetic field from atoms, eliminated in following combination of the deuterium with tritium in helium.The eliminated magnetic field it decompose in particles of electrical ether in chamber of thermonuclear reaction.Any chemical combination eliminate this electrical ether.But at the chemical combination the chemical elements which participate at reaction can not to be magnetic isolated because they it combine before to be ionized.
Any body is accompanied of a personal ether.When it combine two substances, it combine and those two personal ethers, giving birth at another substances with another personal ether, which give body a certain colour and certain properties. Whole what is solid on Earth is impregnated with his personal ether with the more greatest density from the thousands of sorts of ethers.The liquids have them personal ether some rare and gases have them personal ether more rare and diaphanos.
But the seen matter: gaseous, liquid and solid remain not single in her existence, but is dressed, interpenetrated and driven by ethereal matter. Neither an atom of the whose chemical element can exist not, without existence in each atom to one personal part of ethereal matter, which hold him concentrated, which active him and on which hold him in material exchenge with the environing medium, with the others bodies.
I have made only a logical, rational and intuitive synthesis, having at base in majority, experimental, observed and demonstrated arguments. I have not something against the CERN, ITER or NASA, but against the utopian conceptions from theoretical physics with which are indoctrinated thenths of thousands of engineers and physicists involved in ethereal describes of the matter, in realization of the thermonuclear controlled fusion and in mode of transportation the man in cosmos.
The matter of the our terrestrial globe has four states of aggregation: solid, liquid, gseous and ethereal and not three after official science. The matter on which we see it, proceed from the ethereal matter, which from cancentration in concentration it had constituted in the electrons, in protons respectivel;y in the atoms of the chemical elements which had overtaken at the gaseous, liquid and solid state. All the matter on which we see it, is condensed ether.
The GRAVITY’s PARTICLES as aproximately the smallest ethereal particles, constitute the most general ethereal aggregation state from nature, with the largest temperature interval, from zero Kelvin degrees to millions of degrees in stars. That is an aggregation state which coexist with all others aggregation states(solid, liquid, gaseous, ethereal) and on which it influenced them. The actual official science is mistaken in great proportion because this has not in sight the Ether.
The ACTUAL ELECTRICAL GENERATORS : galvanic elements and electrical accumulators; dynamos and alternators; thermoelements and photoelectric cell - transform nothing, but they only gather the electrical energy= the particles of the electrical ether which exist in metals, in the environing medium, in the thermic radiation or in the ray of light!
The ELECTRICAL CURRENT consist in circulation in the round and in lengthways to one electrical conductor to the particles of electrical ether guided on the magnetic field from the round the conductor; magnetic field formed all from particles of electrical ether coupled head at head and expelled in concentric circles in the round the conductor.If it interrupt the electrical current, then it decompose and this magnetic field in particles of electrical ether and it drain in circuit
The ELECTRICAL FIELD is a field of particles of electrical ether, free and it move approximate in right line.The MAGNETIC FIELD from the round of one conductor is constituted forever from particles of the electrical ether, but magnetic coupled head at head and it move on a curve forming concentric circles in round to one conductor.The ELECTROMAGNETIC FIELD is a combination of particles of electrical field anf of curls of magnetic field, having property of the evolve in space.
The ELECTRON is not an exclusive electrical load, but an elementary particle from the composition of any atom, and is only a particle with intermediate role in the unfolding of the electrical phenomenons. The REAL ELECTRCAL LOAD is a particle of electrical ether more nore small than the electron, has and she a personal and rapid rotation, producing a personal magnetic field, which it gear with the magnetic field from the round of one electrical conductor.
The PHYSICAL-CHEMICAL MATTER is the visible matter with free eye and is constituted from atoms of the chemical elements. The PHYSICAL-ETHEREAL MATTER is a matter with atoms more small with 7..8 order of dimension than the atoms of chemical elements, and the bodies formed from this matter are invisible for the human eye. The ETHEREAL PHYSICS it occupy with the study of the ethereal matters, but which was abandoned in the XX century, because in 1905 A.Einstein excludes the ether.
• SandustanBrasov But the ETHER is a physical reality constituted from a very small matter, invisible for human eye, and is formed from atoms more small with 7...8 order of dimension than the atoms of the chemical elements. The matter of the ether penetrate in all the visible bodies and is the physical matter which fills both the interplanetary space and the interatomic space. The ether is a matter with mass and weigth, being subdued and she the action of the universal attraction law.
After Mendeleev's opinion is possible and necessary the extension of periodical system for other size's order - more small- of the ethereal matter particles. About the absolute vacuum space, M.Faraday had the certitude that it doesn't exist, and it exists only an incomplte vacuum whose spatial magnetic state is of the most importance for the natures phenomenons.
D.I.Mendeleev had shown through 1860:"Studying the ether which penetrate in all the bodies and asking myself the question: from what is formed this ether's mass, I had admitted the idea that theirs atoms, or his matter represent the primary matter, from which are formed all atoms. The existence to the one light mass, to the one light substance and less of chemical forces, is possibly but, is even necessary".
The Dutch astronomer Jan Oort from Leyde university, determines in 1965 the density of the matter in the Sun's neighbourhood, of 0.10 solar mass on the cubic parsec. The his conclusion was that in our galaxy exist not an invizible zone(without matter). The Milky Way and our neighbour Andromeda it approach one of another, with a speed of 93 km/s, and not it remove how it believe that make other galaxies.
SandustanBrasov If in 1905 Einstein excludes the ether from physics, viz excludes the intergalactic matter, then the his fanatical disciples, the his theoretical parrots, arrive with the rlativity theory at Big bang, at black holes, holes of worm, at singularity and today at the travel in time. Thus, the great explosion of George Gamov and his follows R.A.Ipfer and R.C.Hermann become cosmological standardized theory, but which is one great bluff!
In 1930..1935 apple of discord was the photon of light. General opinion of the physicists had adopted the viewpoint which unholded not the existence's idea in flight to photon.Thus they had allowed the photon without mass.If the photon has not mass, he can't interact with nothing on trajectory and the light speed remain constant.In place let to consider that the photons lose the speed on way following them interaction with the meeted matter, they had set the Universe let dilate.
In accordance with Hubble's law for two heavenly bodies founded at the same distance from Earth, the constant must needs let has the same value.The three astronomers for respective measurement, they had fixed about 120 spirally galaxies founded in average at the same distance, but in different regions of the supergalaxy.The result was surprising: resulted that the speed of moving off of the galaxies in first region was of 4796 km/s face of 481 km/s for those from second region.
The subsequent investigations, effected in continuous with test all more profound in the dept of the Universe, proved that the value of the Hubble's constant, which bind the speed of moving off with the distance, it cipher in the round a 100 km/s on megaparsec. But in the year 1973, three astronomers: V.C.Rubin, J.S.Rubin and W.K.Ford from observatory Lick from California succeeded let shake in serious mode the infallibility of the Hubble's constant.
In 1929, Hubble and Humason had established that the bright rays which come from a galaxy at a terrestrial observer it manifest in the spectral image to the this galaxy through the displacement of the length of wave, towards the red domain of the spectrum, and the disparity is with so much more great how the transmitting source is more remote.
Face of the initial surprise, at the finding to one Universe in expansion, even Hubble to inclined let explain the displacement towards red, as a tiredness of the light on the immense way which separate her of galaxy which emited her; can be a loss of energy because the nature of the light and the interaction with the matter meeted in way, which give a displacement towards red more great and the Hubble's constant will grow.
Today in front of our eyes and of the observation apparatuss it succedes all evolution phases of the celestial bodies, stars and galaxies. An evidence that the Universe doesn't seems to have an explosive beginning, and doesn't seems to have ever an end in the his entirely. The facts demonstrates that in Universe the cyclical creation has place continuously in certains parts and can has not place total creation in the same time in all the mass of the Universe.
The discovery from 1972 about quasar 3C279, this concrete evidence, guides in physics at the breakdown myth as 300000 km/s as maximum speed; guides in astronomy to the Hubble;s law revision, the law expressed by an empirical relation bound by 13 miliards of years how it considers at taht time the Universe age; and the famous Big bang, the great explosion of George Gamov let be not anything than a great bluff!
The fact seeming strange, after 12 days it take back with care the observations, and it confirm the first results. Moreover, extrapolating the dates towards past the astronomers had arrived at the conclusion that the two parts of the quasar had started let it separate towards the end of the year 1967, date at which the quasar passed through one activity of radioemission very intense. Was the moment when the quasar 3C279 it was broken at least in two parts.
• The both radiotelescopes was oriented towards the 3C279 quasar at which was observed the two double punctual emission very near. After four months it resume the measurements about quasar. Leaving from the period's enlargement to the fringes interference, it deduce and the angular distance between the two source. How the time in which the source had removed was known, it was calculated the speed of moving off and which was of TEN TIMES more great than the light speed!
The quasars are quasistellary bodies which emits intense radiowave and radiation in ultravilet and infrared.The surprise to come from quasar 3C279 from two parts of its resulted in following explosion from 1967 and which it had continuated to displace in space with a speed of ten times more great than the light speed. In 1972 an american astronomers team guided of I.Shapiro had coupled two radiotelescopes: one from Haystack-Massachussets with one from Goldstone-California.
Today, on measure that the theory advances from classic mechanics to the quantum mechanics the particle and wave are gradual dematerialize.The modern physics is blocked by enounciation of some laws and mistaken principles as: relativity theory;Hubble's low, poastulation that the atom can't emit and absorb radiations continuously, admitting the postulate what claims the photons without mass a.s.o.These guide us at supernatural, and at the technical and technological blockage.
Nikola Tesla argued that:"I hold that the space cannot be curved, for the simple reason that it can has not properties. Of properties it can speak only when it work with the matter which fill up the space. The empty space it can not curve because - something - can not action about - nothing". This relativity proceed from a philosophical direction, on which A.Einstein produce her when he was found in a state of technical and religious confusion.
The scientist man Nikola Tesla showed that the relativity theory was the creation of the great philosopher Ruder Boscovich and was emited with over 200 years ago, dealt with relativity, including to so-called time-space continuum, and from this taken and A.Einstein a great part and alter it.
Einstein considers the gravity as a property of the space and not in the least as a property of the matter which fill up this space. The relativity theory of the Einstein is a geometrization of the space. Leibnitz(1646...1716) German scientist, forerunner of the mathematical logic, through the denial the newtonian space-time is and he a forerunner of the Einstein's relativity.
Were introduced in physics the infinite mass phantoms, the infinite energy phantoms and the infinite impulse phantoms when a body or particle would touch the light speed in vacuum. Today we know that many particles were accelerate unill at the light speed, others had arrived with this speed from cosmos, but at none grow up not at infinite or near of infinite the mass, the energy or the impulse.
u guyz should teach urself and see how the world works around u instead of learning from other ppl....
XxMastKiller14xX 5 days ago
@XxMastKiller14xX Ya learning from other people would not be productive at all. Not really even sure why we have teachers...
HuskerSeaofRed 5 days ago
bible is fake-what if there was other human exactly like us in other universe....what if the bible is just made up by ppl and keep changing it...oh and i heard the bible from christian says that jesus doesnt really love u.....he just sparing u for the war...
XxMastKiller14xX 5 days ago
The fuck?
TheRichiecha 6 days ago
faith is the willful suspension of critical thinking and i don't see why that is good
jon244 2 weeks ago
I believe this might answer the question about how 1 of posibly many or endless amounts of universes (can you say that?) that exsist. But I don't believe this answers the question of EXSISTANCE... this says there was something before us, how did that get there? what made that tiny particle? there for it must have been a higher being. And I believe this higher being is God.
SyThco13 1 month ago
@SyThco13, Then wwere God comes from?
calvintrainer1212 3 weeks ago
@calvintrainer1212 I don't know?? Who am I God it self???
We first should answer the questions that our minds can perceive, and the we can try to figure out the questions that will utterly blow our minds ;)
SyThco13 3 weeks ago
@SyThco13 , Then you don't know the answer, but you believe God creates everything? So he 's a creation or just an imagination of your mind? My question was If God creates everything then who created him? Where he comes from? Who creates the entity who created God? Believing is NOT the answer. Faith is not an answer neither. Just because science doesn't have the answer, that doesn't make religion correct in their belief. Believe in God without a sciencetific proof has created conflicts in human
calvintrainer1212 3 weeks ago
@calvintrainer1212 Look, I'm no religious fanatic, I just think theres a higher being and IT created everything we understand. the universe, and the phenomenon of life is too strange for just coming out of nothing! I believe sicence, ( a tool man uses to understand things) will prove there is a higher being, and then I will know my FAITH has been in the right spot the whole time.
SyThco13 3 weeks ago
@calvintrainer1212 And by the way the belief of God did nothing to people, but man abused this "Great Idea" to forage power, thus giving us conflict through out history.
SyThco13 3 weeks ago
@SyThco13, Fair enough, Bible says earth was created around several 1000 years old . Some stars takes 1 millions years just get there traveling at light speed. The solid evident is earth at least 5 billions years old. What part of that people couldn't connect to make up their mind? Some pyramids are older than the age of earth according to the bible's estimate of its age
calvintrainer1212 3 weeks ago
@calvintrainer1212 So your one of those people? Your not suppose to take the bilbe litterally, if you study the bible the first thing you need to know is that you must take it symbolisticly other wise it wouldn't make sense. I Believe the bible like the coran (or how ever its spelled) was completely altered to fit the needs as of means to have power over people. You see this in acent Rome, in the witch trials and other things. If you want to believe that there is no omious being thats you bro.
SyThco13 3 weeks ago
@calvintrainer1212 But don't have a closed mind or you won't really learn much passed the limitations of your prejudice. ( not saying your f-ed up just the blockades of your mind)
SyThco13 3 weeks ago
@SyThco13 , Religion is a form of brain washing to control people. Belief turns people into sheeps. Contradict to what your said, I open my mind to vastness of the universal, unlimited by earth bound idealology that's over 2000 years old and out of date. To a sheep the master could be a dog that steer it. Because the sheep doesn't know any better. The sheep is limited by it knowledge hence a dog can control it . Just because you don't understand something don't "blame" it on your imaginary god
calvintrainer1212 3 weeks ago
@SyThco13 Wrll man, believe what you want I'm tired of flaming and I know what I know. To really expain ANYTHING of this caliber would be vertually impossible... at least in this life time have a good one bro think about it, and don't down people for there beliefs. Its beautiful if you have a faith thats all I could really say.
SyThco13 3 weeks ago
This has been flagged as spam show
In the Qur'an, which was revealed fourteen centuries ago at a time when the science of astronomy was still primitive, the expansion of the universe was described in the following terms: And it is We Who have constructed the heaven with might, and verily, it is We Who are steadily expanding it.(Qur'an,51:47)
Do not the unbelievers see that the heavens and the Earth were sewn together and then We unstitched them and that We made from water every living thing? So will they not believe? (Qur'21:30)
MrMounir90 1 month ago
I'll have to watch this 13 billon times =/
lolnclol 2 months ago
My mind was just blown.
So if we were at one of the stars at the edge of our observable sphere, we would then have a different sphere of observable universe? Because I was always told that the universe folded in on itself, thus everything we see would be seen by everything else in the universe.
However, the video showed a much bigger universe, with only a small portion being our observable universe. Is the universe infinite with different regions seeing different things?
wes5020 2 months ago
@wes5020 yes its true. regardless of where you are you are in the center of your observable universe.
peronkop 2 months ago
@peronkop right right i know that. I meant something else.
I'll put it another way. Let's say that our universe is centered at Iowa and we are only able to see the continental United States, so that is our observable universe. I'm asking if we were transported to a different part of the universe, would we be able to see different parts of the universe, like being in Montana where now we can see Canada?
wes5020 2 months ago
@wes5020 Yeah thats is also true. We would probably have a new observable universe. If Im correct the entire universe stretch far, far, far beyond what we can see. Our observable universe could be the size of an atom compared to the real deal.
peronkop 2 months ago
@peronkop well thank you very much peronkop
wes5020 2 months ago
Comment removed
3KS26 2 months ago
Comment removed
3KS26 2 months ago
Comment removed
3KS26 2 months ago
@wes5020
Continued...........
The best way to visualize the universe is to imagine the Universe to be a giant blob of dough with raisins spread throughout it. The raisons represent galaxies and the dough represents space itself. When the dough is placed in the oven it begins to expand thus the distance between galaxies gets bigger as time goes on.
Hope this answered you question. Cheers!
3KS26 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@wes5020
If you travelled far enough through space by the speed of light, you would eventually see a new set of stars. You will have moved in the direction of a new stars thus suddenly see new light. But you will have also moved in the direction of dead stars thus suddenly not see the light that you used to see.
The universe isn't infinite but it is expanding. The big bang was an explosion of space, not an explosion of matter in space. You need to visualize it to understand it.
Continue..
3KS26 2 months ago
I knew looking at the comments would be a bad idea.
0pteryx 2 months ago
Need subtitles.
ggova 2 months ago
@ggova
Got that right xD
When i looked at the comments i was ''O.O''
toforto3 2 months ago
ok so how big the universe that we can't observe?
peronkop 2 months ago
Very cool video. Even with my heavy math background in Electrical Engineering, I still find some of the quantum and relativity principles to be mind bending. But in the end, it really is just mental masturbation. What matters is not the space outside of us, but inside of us. Overcoming internal loneliness, ignorance, intolerance, and caring for one another... since the likelihood of finding any aliens diminishes ever sec... is the most vital thing in this age. But I enjoy the fruits of research
TheShadowlin 2 months ago
awesome video. Definitely subbing. Thanks for posting. This is the stuff we need to overcome ignorance, superstition and religion.
ofosusam 2 months ago
@ofosusam having been atheist before I can tell you science has more to learn from some religions than those religions from science. In China they are modernizing fast and getting rid of religion/tradition... and in Tibet millions of Chinese migrate there because the modern world has no meaning. It takes both to understand the deeper Truths of the world. The one problem with atheism is it supposes "because I cannot find it, it must not exist." That is not science. Not in the least.
TheShadowlin 2 months ago
@TheShadowlin what are deeper truths? evidence, like science? or fuzzy feelings like religion advertizes? No, your quote above does not represent atheism at all. If we dont know, we accept we are lacking knowledge and need to research it. religion says "I dont know so gods did it". If it still does not add up they say "well we believe on faith". science is based on evidence, atheism is based on rational thought. not knowing to atheists means more hard work ahead.
ofosusam 2 months ago
@TheShadowlin - contuation - . So we are still trying to prove gods, so far no evidence. so we are inclined to dismiss the idea. Just like you would dismiss it if I keep telling you I put a million dollars in your bank, but yoru online banking says you have a balance of 200. At some point you would dismiss it and think I am crazy. Would that be due to faith or the lack of evidnce? or would there be a deeper truth behind it bcos I dont know the ingredients to manufacture money? religion is bunk
ofosusam 2 months ago
@ofosusam Yes, no evidence of those anthropomorphic gods that have been designed in the mind of man, though when I use the term I am referring to a much more naturalistic deity, one that satisfies all conditions of the known and unknown universe, and that mysterious time we call the future unknowable. I am a Panentheist and find life and the natural world fascinating but I am still confounded as to why people can not see that the religious institutions have caused so much pain and destruction
StephenWebb1980 2 months ago
@StephenWebb1980 In-so-far as truth is concerned, I see it as nothing more than a constant emerging from a system with rules that are indicative of its own self evidence. In math, the language of science, we have rules that tell us 2+2=4, that truth is pretty evident but only because the rules we have devised make it so. Anytime I hear someone say they have the truth, I ask them to explain and almost never do I hear any sensible answer. I think the definition I posted above is a damn good one
StephenWebb1980 2 months ago
QAT explains this as a continuous act of creation. We look far away to see the past reduced to a point (just as we can form our mathematics). We look very close into the void or atom to see the process of creation taking place at all points in the spherical universe (just a we can form our mathematics). In this sense the big bang exists as our observable infinite past and quantum reality exists as our possible very near futures. A sort of recursive process of expanding spherical light waves. :)
AtomosDemocritus 3 months ago
ever really know these things. 1st Q = Where did the stuff come from FIRST? READ THIS i dont really have any faith in any religion right now so this is not about god or my stance on any theories. I dont really think i have any just my own thoughts. I dont admit to most people that i'm not sure if i belive in any god or any religion. I'm even kinda ashamed to say this to you all now. These are what I myself belive to be facts. Man has always wanted a creator for these reasons.
joshuaadamcox 4 months ago
@joshuaadamcox dude dont be ashamed that you dont know what to believe, thats probably one of the best stances you can have right now, to admit you could be wrong. Thats roughly where I am too. I hate it when I see people state things as fact that they couldnt possibly know.
DemonReacher 3 months ago
@joshuaadamcox It did not come from anything, it always was. But the presence of Mind consummated it by giving it form and name, or else it would have no form. This essence of Mind of of fractal math indicates that God is superstructure of conscience, the dimensions and shape we have not yet found a way to detect. However there are many things science is aware of but cannot find proof of with a microscope. cont'd
TheShadowlin 2 months ago
At any rate the superstructure's formation spontaeously while providing definition to space-time suggests that God did not create the Universe but IS the Universe. The unknown energy quantified by Mind (we have no current way of calculating) operates in strange ways. For instance we can share data but still Relativity oft bends our interpretations. So even when we describe God as this superstructure it tells us little because we cannot know the way to interpret that much data simultaneously.
TheShadowlin 2 months ago
However we can make a small controlled experiment out of our own lives. In effect, using an individual - like a baby - to see how the Universe forms. When an infant is born, it rapidly expands and then starts to learn names. Before this period, all things are as One nameless blob. The first knowing is mom, dad, and food/water. Then more things and more things dividing forever until old age, dementia, and death.
TheShadowlin 2 months ago
The current theory is that the Universe dissipates as expansion occurs. Like life, faster and faster each day, becoming more confusing and difficult to make connections. Soon one's own "world" seems far removed from others - which is why coupling and mating is important to avoid loneliness (IMO). But at the end, all of it blends back into the Void.
So it would seem likely in the cycle of things that God, too, must dissipate with the Universe, at least until the coupling occurs again. But...
TheShadowlin 2 months ago
the topic of universal reincarnation is to most theoretical, though they are trying to find evidence of existence before the Big Bang. It seems unlikely we will .. but hey since one can meditate and through dream-like trance revisit oneself in past lives, well I suppose science may one day find a way to revisit past Universes. It's all unimportant unless you make lessons from it. What this stuff tells me is life is short: love early and long, and don't hold on too hard It All is slippery stuff.
TheShadowlin 2 months ago
I dont think we can actually know this... I dont have any better ideas or id be posting a video and not a comment... I'm not asking this next question because of any faith in any religion before im done im prob going to wind up asking alot of them that i hope if any of you have an idea about id APPRECIATE you sharing with me because i would love to hear others ideas to my questions... I'm not even going to pretend i understand everything explained in this video but i still dont think we could
joshuaadamcox 4 months ago
"Enjoy yourself, It's later than you think!". Amazing stuff.
boilerplate7 4 months ago
yay yet another comment section polluted by religion (mainly christianity)
if those people wouldn't feel the need to suck everybody into their delusions
some really interesting discussions about science could go on here :(
unamaxify 4 months ago
@unamaxify only insecure people are mortified by challenges or feel the need to denigrade others and make their own stance seem more plausible.
The pot calling the kettle black.
Nescience is not science.
TheShadowlin 2 months ago
@TheShadowlin
i don't apologize for the truth.
-
by implying that i'm insecure you are denigrating me
-> oh the Irony is burning
-
you're a moron
unamaxify 2 months ago
Cool story Bro
8000Brad 4 months ago
After watching this i decided to masturbate to compensate my lack of understanding ...but then again... after a while i thought to myself Im still better than those that sell drugs and cares about blings blings more than the super nova or black holes... as the result am proud of myself again...but not as much as before i watched this document.
zero00tolerance 5 months ago
@zero00tolerance ha ha, i like your comment
niunanfen 2 months ago
Quran Chapter 51 Verse 47 "And the heaven, We built it with might, and we are still EXPANDING it "
nonbutone 5 months ago
@nonbutone Shut up. Astrophysics has no room for those that believe in fairy tales. Congrats, you pointed out a fraction of what the Quran says. You left out the many parts about how inferior women are to men thus giving Islamic men the "right" to rape women who don't dress "modestly". Let's not forget about the part that says a female captive of war has every right to be raped.
iz2sicc 5 months ago in playlist Astronomy / Cosmology
@iz2sicc fairenough, but tell your astrophysics friends to stop bragging about just discovering that the earth is expanding discovered with their 'High tech' equipment.. We knew this 1433 years ago without any telescopes.
Show me the part where the quran says "Islamic men the right to rape women who don't dress modestly". On the contrary rapists must be stoned to death, but you show me where its says that. We are looking forward to it.
nonbutone 5 months ago
@nonbutone quran 33:50 lawful to you are your wives and your slave girls allah has given you as booty. quran 4:24 forbidden to you are wedded wives of other people except those who have fallen in your hands as prisoners of war. quran 23:5-6 who restrain their carnal desires except with their wives and slave girls, for these are lawful to them. they are to many like this to list.
iz2sicc 5 months ago
@iz2sicc nice try buddy. Where in those verses did it say we are allowed to rape any women?? Why didnt you complete v 33:50 where it continues by saying Lawful to you are "prisoners of war whom Allah has assigned to you; AND daughters of ur paternal and maternal uncles and aunts ... and any believing woman "
OH so we are allowed to rape any of those women?? LOL this is what happens when an silly ignorant person does a quick Google search looking for a quick way to suit his negativity
nonbutone 4 months ago
@nonbutone Apparently you lack comprehension. I put "right" in quotations for a reason. The criminal Islamic (I'm singling out the bad guys, not all Islamic men) men use their religion as an excuse for raping western women for dressing like "whores". Also, when scripture tells you that wedded wives are forbidden except those that are prisoners of war, it's pretty obvious that it's describing your right to have sexual relations with that slave. I'm guessing the slave won't be willing so yes, RAPE
iz2sicc 4 months ago
@nonbutone You can play semantics all you want, but I'm still confident that you're intelligent enough to realize that, that particular entry is talking about the right to rape a female slave that you obtained from war. I mean come on bro... if a president was writing that same line into legislation, would you still think that it is not talking about raping a slave of war? I know the only reason that you defend such scripture is because of your religion. Outside of that, you'd think it's wrong.
iz2sicc 4 months ago
@iz2sicc With all my replys and rebuttal to your claims, you give me such a comment... LOL Pathetic..
nonbutone 4 months ago
@nonbutone Calling a person "pathetic" is not a very good way to get the message of your religion across.
iz2sicc 4 months ago
@nonbutone Furthermore, what's wrong with Googling for information? Are suggesting that you do not Google to obtain information for other purposes? I think the Google argument is a cop out. There are a lot of bad sources on the Internet no doubt. However, scholarly articles, passages from religious sites themselves, etc.. are all credible sources. So let's not play the childish, "Oh, you Googled it. Good job broski" game. Your bible and things on Google were all written/typed by humans.
iz2sicc 4 months ago
@nonbutone I'll believe that Islam does not treat women like trash when Islam allows all of the beautiful Arab women to dress freely. I'll believe that Islam treats women fairly when I see the majority of Arab men who rape western women stop using the excuse of "They were dressed like whores so they asked for it. I'm protected because of my religion". Seriously, why do you live your life blinded by a book that was written with the hands of men? Jupiter is in the sky right now. Science is beauty.
iz2sicc 5 months ago
@iz2sicc bit diff to a verse that says If U get cought raping a girl U pay her daddy $50 Dollars and you MUST marry her NERVER ever divorce her ay.. (Bible Deute 22-28:29)
Regards womens dress, this is why jesus said if you look at a women lustfully then PLUCK Ur eyes and throw them away!! (mathew 5:28)
This is why your bible says in 1 Corrinthians 11:3-6 'Cover your hair or it must be SHAVED OFF'
Mat 7 1:2 "Why do you judge? For in the same way you judge others, U will be judged"
nonbutone 4 months ago
@nonbutone Why are you throwing Christian scripture at me as if I think it's any more ridiculous than the Quran scripture? Sorry, I do no discriminate when it comes to my unbelief in religion.
iz2sicc 4 months ago
@nonbutone By the way, although Christians have these scripture that you quote, they lack extremists that follow it dangerously. I'm speaking in comparative terms with Islamic extremists. Suicide bombers and beheadings... In modern day, an extreme Christian is the likes of West Boro. Maybe a cult leader that charismatically leads people to suicide. But if you bring up past history, I won't argue that Christians have probably committed far worse.
iz2sicc 4 months ago
@iz2sicc I think you are getting confused with the bible:
Deuteronomy 22:28-29
“If a man meets a virgin , and seizes her(forces) and lies with her, and they are found, then the man who lay with her shall give to the father of the young woman fifty shekels of silver, and she shall be his wife, because he has violated her. He may not divorce her all his days."
So because he raped her he has to pay her day $50 and she cannot divorce him.. LOL lovely
nonbutone 5 months ago
A couple of things in the vid deserve some elaboration. Objects bound by forces, like the earth in orbit about the sun, do not expand. But the expansion of space does have a tiny static influence upon the size of the earth's orbit. A tiny fraction of an inch, so small that we cannot measure the difference. Also the history of objects with a current redshift of 1.8 will be visible to us for billions of years. But we'll never see anything that happens to them beyond what happened to them today.
sbergman27 5 months ago
Humm ... two trains moving away from eachother do not influence eachothers speed. You could calculate the growing distance between the objects, but without a static point of reference, you cant say anything about the speed of the individual objects. Nothing is able to travel faster then the speed of light. But two objects moving at exactly the speed of light in opposite directions will give an observer on either of those objects the idea that the other object moves faster then the speed of light
PlanetJeroen 6 months ago
@PlanetJeroen " But two objects moving at exactly the speed of light in opposite directions will give an observer on either of those objects the idea that the other object moves faster then the speed of light"
Errrm, no, that is completely wrong and misses the whole point about things moving through space-time rather than space.
chrisofnottingham 5 months ago
@chrisofnottingham Not really ... but please explain what you mean ?
PlanetJeroen 5 months ago
@PlanetJeroen Actually, only things with no mass can move at the speed of light so there could never be an observer on board but if we use 0.9 speed of light instead (relative to some arbitrary inertial object), then each object would measure that the other was moving at 0.9944 the speed of light. The apparent mismatch in adding up speeds is resolved by each one also measuring that time appears to be running slowly for the other object.
This is all very old hat these days.
chrisofnottingham 5 months ago
@chrisofnottingham If they move away from eachother, there is no way in hell they will measure 0.9944 ... and be able to call it accurate. You are referring to the 1 static, one @ speed of light scenario I think. Then time slows down depending on where you observe .. quite sure of that tbh.
PlanetJeroen 5 months ago
@PlanetJeroen
math(dot)ucr.edu(slash)home(slash)baez(slash)physics(slash)Relativity(slash)SR/velocity(dot)html
just put in 0.9 for u and v and put c =1
chrisofnottingham 5 months ago
@chrisofnottingham I was talking about an observer ON either object, not about essentialy 3 moving objects in relation to eachother :?
PlanetJeroen 5 months ago
@PlanetJeroen You weren't. When you say "two objects moving at C" it implies an independent frame of reference. In fact there is no independent frame of reference in space, all motion is only relative (Relativity geddit?!!) so you have to introduce one. In fact in the special case of C you don't need to because one of the results of relativity is that ALL observers measure all objects moving at C as moving at C relative to themselves, even if the observers have relative motion too.
chrisofnottingham 5 months ago
...With no frame of reference it is generally pointless to talk about adding velocities between 2 objects because there aren't two velocities, there is only the relative velocity between them in the first place. The very act of mentioning two speeds for two objects implies a reference frame centred on a third party and that is what the equation for non linear adding of velocities at relativistic speeds covers. In everyday life, our reference frame is usually the surface of the Earth.
chrisofnottingham 5 months ago
@chrisofnottingham No, it does not. I gave a situation where the ovserved speed, while on either of the objects, would be bigger then C, while in all actuality, nothing would travel faster then C. Then you came in to correct me. Read back, you'll see what I mean ;)
PlanetJeroen 5 months ago
@PlanetJeroen My response was to this...
"Nothing is able to travel faster then the speed of light. But two objects moving at exactly the speed of light in opposite directions *****will give an observer on either of those objects the idea that the other object moves faster then the speed of light*****"
That is just plain wrong, as any undergrad in physics will tell you.
If an object moves at C it moves at C with respect to all objects, include other objects moving a C in other directions...
chrisofnottingham 5 months ago
@chrisofnottingham hmz .. ic ... back to not understanding relativity then :/
PlanetJeroen 5 months ago
@PlanetJeroen Any kind of understanding of relativity, as distinct from parrot fashion learning, is really hard to achieve. IMHO the biggest stumbling block is really embracing that there is no absolute frame of reference in space. The moment we draw a diagram we fool ourselves into making a framework. This in itself isn't so bad but later when you try to deal with time and space dilation the thing that often trips you up is reverting to thinking in terms of an absolute speed or position.
chrisofnottingham 5 months ago
@chrisofnottingham Well .. atm I'm trying to wrap my head around how 2 objects moving at near-C away from eachother will only see the other as moving at near-C... once I got that again, I'll probably find that I still dont understand it :p
PlanetJeroen 5 months ago
@PlanetJeroen I think the best approach is to accept that C is an absolute limit, just because it has been measured to be true. Then look at what has to give way in order for that to be maintained. And what has to give is that relatively moving observers disagree about the distance and time between any two events. Distance shouldn't be too bad to grasp because each sees themselves as stationary. Then time "has to" dilate to keep the numbers right, and that is pretty hard to take.
chrisofnottingham 5 months ago
... the only problem being that at the full value of C an "observer" would experience all journeys as taking zero time anyway. Which is why it is less confusing to deal with 0.9C but either way no observer ever sees anything happening at 2C (other than due to expansion of space).
chrisofnottingham 5 months ago
Comment removed
chrisofnottingham 5 months ago
It would really suck if subatomic particles worked this same way, like the space within an atom.
lattask8er 6 months ago
"Why isn't the universe expanding in particles to?"
Because at small scales other (attracting) forces are stronger than the force of expansion: the weak and strong atomic forces, electromagnetic force, and gravity. The force of expansion dominates only at scales larger than super clusters of galaxies.
rspawn 7 months ago
One question comes to my mind... Why isn't the universe expanding in particles to ? I mean, the space between electron and nucleus should expand to...
Acrimonator 7 months ago
Comment removed
Acrimonator 7 months ago
Comment removed
Acrimonator 7 months ago
They keep saying they are so close to the "Theory of Everything" as if it's going to be something simple. But as your well aware the more and more we have expanded our knowledge of Physics, the more complicated it has gotten. It's like every time we find something new it answers part of a question, but brings up several new questions. And when things like the Uncertainty Principle, you have to ask - how do we really know what we know, and if it works?
lattask8er 7 months ago
Are you serious?! How do we know? We know our theories work because they hold true when various tests are applied against them!
tropickman 7 months ago
@tropickman Test them, where in labs, facilities, on computers, with atom smashers sure yea it works in these places but we don't really see how these things work at an exact moment in the universe so tell me again how you know these things work?
lattask8er 7 months ago
@tropickman you didn't spot the troll ? :D
Acrimonator 7 months ago
@lattask8er obvious troll is obvious...
Acrimonator 7 months ago
@Acrimonator I would expect someone as redundant as you would rather try and answer my question then go with something as simple as calling me a troll.
lattask8er 7 months ago
@lattask8er your question's already've been answered.
Acrimonator 7 months ago
@Acrimonator Lol...well I guess you tried, thanks. ;]
lattask8er 7 months ago
@lattask8er at your service.
Acrimonator 7 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
had to see it twice to try to understand it!
yincito7 8 months ago
if the inflation speed is accelerating, what is going to happen when the inflation speed will reach and pass the speed of light?
AnTr3Y 8 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
SandustanBrasov
And yet, we can see, we can visualize the ethereal matter. The scheme to one device for to visualize the ethereal matter: EXIST! And this device it can realize!
My e-mail: s.stan65@yahoo.com
You Tube: sandustanBrasov’s Channel
sandustanBrasov 8 months ago
so why doesnt the guy run instead of walk? BAM i just blew your mind!
tjhall1000 8 months ago
V V V Schizophrenic narcissist below me. V V V
ephemerealfox 8 months ago 5
SandustanBrasov
The UNIFIED LAW is the LAW of the UNIVERSAL ATTRACTION FORCES= of the GRAVITATIONAL INTERACTION FORCES = of the ELECTROMAGNETIC FIELD FORCES produced by the inner movement of the inertial rotation of the ethereal matter from bodies and substances. This, because, the ethereal particles are in continuous movement through the them nature, being electrical – produce electrical energy, being named and electrogenic particles.
sandustanBrasov 8 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
• SandustanBrasov
Thus, all the physics's laws, chemistry's laws and biology's laws it can include and explain through this unified law of the electromagnetic field produced of inner movement of inertial rotation of the matter from bodies and substances. The spacial brethren say us about Newton that: "Newton is great saint with us in Sky!"
sandustanBrasov 8 months ago
SandustanBrasov
The unified law of Newton will throw at rubbish Einstein’s relativity, with Big bang, black holes, singularity and holes of worm. With these methaphysical theories and animation about absorption the Eartn or Sun it destroy logical thinking and reason at man. With this dissiness enter man in terrestrial life, and no more believe that he has a future. Result thus blocking of the society, which lead at general corruption of society and at her sodominess and dissoluteness.
sandustanBrasov 8 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
• SandustanBrasov
The UNIVERSAL ATTRACTION LAW it apply identically to the movement the atoms of the ethereal matters, identically to the movement the atoms of the chemical elements, identically to the movement the planets and stars of the one galaxy, because any body of any dimension possess a mass and thus is subdued the newtonian forces of interaction.
sandustanBrasov 8 months ago
• SandustanBrasov
The universal attraction law of the Newton is the UNIFIED LAW because all those three fundamental interactions: the nuclear interaction, the electromagnetic(electron-proto¬n) interaction and the gravitational interaction are interactions produced through the ethereal matter, what bind the classical physics of the good part of the modern physics, but it bind and the ETHEREAL PHYSICS.
sandustanBrasov 8 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
SandustanBrasov
Any will be the couple of material bodies, the newtonian system contain the idea that a force of attraction unite them, that they are attracts one towards the other of this proportional force with the multiplied the masses, and reverse proportional with the square of the distance which separate them.
sandustanBrasov 8 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
• SandustanBrasov
All those three principles of the dynamics: the inertia's principle, the principle the proportionality of the acceleration with the force and the principle of the action and reaction - are essential elements of the universal attraction law; which in essence is a law of the inertial mass in motion.
sandustanBrasov 8 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
• SandustanBrasov
The “GRAVITY” is a radiation and an electromagnetic quadripolar field between two bodies. The gravity is not a chemical fixed bound, but is an elastic bound, which accompanys all those four states of aggregation of the matter: solid, liquid, gaseous and ethereal.
sandustanBrasov 8 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
• SandustanBrasov
The INERTIAL MOVE from matter produce the gravitational field, and the gravity with her particles ties the macrocosmos with microcosmos and influenced all what exists sitting thus at the general existence basis. The UNIFIED LAW of matter's forces I can say with cetainly that it exists from some hundred years and is Newton's universal attraction law.
sandustanBrasov 8 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
SandustanBrasov
Isaac Newton establishes the basic notion of classical mechanics, proved the universal attraction law and put base of the celestial mechanics. Newton had affirmed that it hasn't existed natural process who hasn't produced by attraction and repulsion active forces which regulates the celestial bodies movement and the bodies faling down,that leeds the chemical and mechanical processes, fact which makes that the universal attraction law acts as in macrocosmos and as in microcosmos.
sandustanBrasov 8 months ago
SandustanBrasov
In the zone collisions and explosion starry, from the primary matter - matter under electrical field, magnetic field and radiations form, it begins to form the underatomic particles; first the electron which remain as crystallisation nucleus definitized on him the neutron, which at that time when becomes free oneself is transformed in proton and electron, respective in atoms of hydrogen, giving immenses hydrogen clouds what finds on the starry cataclysms place.
sandustanBrasov 8 months ago
SandustanBrasov
In an atom, the peripherical big speed at so little radius are proof that every particle or group of particles can create continuously a personal magnetic field in which floats and which permit them an inertial rotation movement without rapid lesses, as a celestial body in cosmical space.For example, the medium's density at 200 miles above Earth is so small, that if Jupiter it will turn in this medium 1000000 years, then Jupiter will lose not to millionth part from his motion!
sandustanBrasov 8 months ago
• SandustanBrasov
Thus two bodies in interaction creates between them a magnetic depresion what constitute the attraction force between bodies. In a similar mode it can construct the magnetic fields schedule for a helium atom in which we have: 1).-the magnetic field created by the nucleus; 2).-the electromagnetic field created between an electron and a proton; 3).-the gravitational electromagnetic field of the atom, field what is absorbed of atom and is accelerated by the electromagnetic field.
sandustanBrasov 8 months ago
• SandustanBrasov
Thus the viscous material from the central zone can get only through a certain extremity, evolving around the particle or further away in space from where it turns by the other extremity of the particle. The inertial movement working of the underatomic particles and the atoms as whole permits them to compare with the powerful ASPIRATORS which absorbs, but its emits too matter under the form of magnetic field's particles.
sandustanBrasov 8 months ago
• SandustanBrasov
Loops which at the substraction of rotation speed are retiring, and at growth rotation speed, evolves around the particle and enter through the other end forming a continuously mass circulation of primary matter from the central zone. The external's part of the particle by friction with the medium become a spherical surface, and in the inner share where continuous the crystallisation it will obtain an uniformly waved surface, with helicoidal channels disposed around his axis.
sandustanBrasov 8 months ago
• SandustanBrasov
The general schedule of existence of any underatomic particle is a schedule to one sphere with central section on the rotation vertical axis of the particle in which we have: 1).-the carcass resulting by the radially crystallisation, from external to internal; 2).-the viscous inner mass; 3).-inner helicoid channel disposed around the axis, resulted in the last carcass crystallisation; 4).-magnetic field loops or primary viscous mass loops from the central zone.
sandustanBrasov 8 months ago
• SandustanBrasov
How the solidification begins from external it would resultated that in the central zone at any underatomic particles would remained continuously a primary matter mass, more viscous, so that to the shown rotations the free underatomic particles, or in the atom's frame, to take out in space matter from the central zone, but on which to it recover continuously for maintaining the them integrity.
sandustanBrasov 8 months ago
• SandustanBrasov
The atoms, the underatomic particles, the radiations - all to be possible to crystallize at highter temperature. Continuing so we arrive to the gravitational field particles whose characteristics: rapid movement, great power of penetration and reciprocal attraction proves that they also can be composed.
sandustanBrasov 8 months ago
• SandustanBrasov
The existence of the rotation motion in macrocosmos and in microcosmos, and the great temperature interval from zero Kelvin degrees at millions of degrees in stars, guide us attention towards the inertial masses in motion and towards the matter's crystallisation phenomenons. Naturally, the crystallisation bigins from external(from periphery) and advances towards the central zone. The bodies and substances known by man, are crystallizing between 0...4000 Kelvin degrees.
sandustanBrasov 8 months ago
• SandustanBrasov
Mendeleev had shown that we can not conceive without motion even the smallest matter particle. It says about radiations but about atoms and molecules that they have a vibration frequency of approximate 10 at 13 …10 at 15 what means that these are turning arround theirs self axes with 10 at 13 …10 at 15 rotations on second proofing the existence of a continuous inertial motion .
sandustanBrasov 8 months ago
SandustanBrasov
Our brethren from ITER have capacity of to construct controlled thermonuclear reactor, only that they must let abandon tokamak installation.Because that the tokamak installation were invented in 1950 by phisicists Igor Tamm and Andrei Sakharov, inspired by idea of Oleg Lavrentyev, when he studiing the realization of the hydrogen bomb which it has not need of magnetic trap, and thus all experiments were finished with destructuion of the tokamak installations in the central zone.
sandustanBrasov 8 months ago
• SandustanBrasov
As following of the thermonuclear reaction from Sun, the Sun is a giant powerstation of electromagnetic energy, a powerfull source of electricity which keep up the life of every where from his planetary system.This electrical ether which come from Sun, we gather him with our electrical generators and drive our industry. This electrical ether is absorbed and of the our bodies and of any creature, - electrical ether which keep and animate the our existence.
sandustanBrasov 8 months ago
SandustanBrasov
The electrical ether- for example- proceed from magnetic field from atoms, eliminated in following combination of the deuterium with tritium in helium.The eliminated magnetic field it decompose in particles of electrical ether in chamber of thermonuclear reaction.Any chemical combination eliminate this electrical ether.But at the chemical combination the chemical elements which participate at reaction can not to be magnetic isolated because they it combine before to be ionized.
sandustanBrasov 8 months ago
SandustanBrasov
Any body is accompanied of a personal ether.When it combine two substances, it combine and those two personal ethers, giving birth at another substances with another personal ether, which give body a certain colour and certain properties. Whole what is solid on Earth is impregnated with his personal ether with the more greatest density from the thousands of sorts of ethers.The liquids have them personal ether some rare and gases have them personal ether more rare and diaphanos.
sandustanBrasov 8 months ago
• SandustanBrasov
But the seen matter: gaseous, liquid and solid remain not single in her existence, but is dressed, interpenetrated and driven by ethereal matter. Neither an atom of the whose chemical element can exist not, without existence in each atom to one personal part of ethereal matter, which hold him concentrated, which active him and on which hold him in material exchenge with the environing medium, with the others bodies.
sandustanBrasov 8 months ago
• SandustanBrasov
I have made only a logical, rational and intuitive synthesis, having at base in majority, experimental, observed and demonstrated arguments. I have not something against the CERN, ITER or NASA, but against the utopian conceptions from theoretical physics with which are indoctrinated thenths of thousands of engineers and physicists involved in ethereal describes of the matter, in realization of the thermonuclear controlled fusion and in mode of transportation the man in cosmos.
sandustanBrasov 8 months ago
• SandustanBrasov
The matter of the our terrestrial globe has four states of aggregation: solid, liquid, gseous and ethereal and not three after official science. The matter on which we see it, proceed from the ethereal matter, which from cancentration in concentration it had constituted in the electrons, in protons respectivel;y in the atoms of the chemical elements which had overtaken at the gaseous, liquid and solid state. All the matter on which we see it, is condensed ether.
sandustanBrasov 8 months ago
SandustanBrasov
The GRAVITY’s PARTICLES as aproximately the smallest ethereal particles, constitute the most general ethereal aggregation state from nature, with the largest temperature interval, from zero Kelvin degrees to millions of degrees in stars. That is an aggregation state which coexist with all others aggregation states(solid, liquid, gaseous, ethereal) and on which it influenced them. The actual official science is mistaken in great proportion because this has not in sight the Ether.
sandustanBrasov 8 months ago
• SandustanBrasov
The ACTUAL ELECTRICAL GENERATORS : galvanic elements and electrical accumulators; dynamos and alternators; thermoelements and photoelectric cell - transform nothing, but they only gather the electrical energy= the particles of the electrical ether which exist in metals, in the environing medium, in the thermic radiation or in the ray of light!
sandustanBrasov 8 months ago
SandustanBrasov
The ELECTRICAL CURRENT consist in circulation in the round and in lengthways to one electrical conductor to the particles of electrical ether guided on the magnetic field from the round the conductor; magnetic field formed all from particles of electrical ether coupled head at head and expelled in concentric circles in the round the conductor.If it interrupt the electrical current, then it decompose and this magnetic field in particles of electrical ether and it drain in circuit
sandustanBrasov 8 months ago
• SandustanBrasov
The ELECTRICAL FIELD is a field of particles of electrical ether, free and it move approximate in right line.The MAGNETIC FIELD from the round of one conductor is constituted forever from particles of the electrical ether, but magnetic coupled head at head and it move on a curve forming concentric circles in round to one conductor.The ELECTROMAGNETIC FIELD is a combination of particles of electrical field anf of curls of magnetic field, having property of the evolve in space.
sandustanBrasov 8 months ago
• SandustanBrasov
The ELECTRON is not an exclusive electrical load, but an elementary particle from the composition of any atom, and is only a particle with intermediate role in the unfolding of the electrical phenomenons. The REAL ELECTRCAL LOAD is a particle of electrical ether more nore small than the electron, has and she a personal and rapid rotation, producing a personal magnetic field, which it gear with the magnetic field from the round of one electrical conductor.
sandustanBrasov 8 months ago
SandustanBrasov
The PHYSICAL-CHEMICAL MATTER is the visible matter with free eye and is constituted from atoms of the chemical elements. The PHYSICAL-ETHEREAL MATTER is a matter with atoms more small with 7..8 order of dimension than the atoms of chemical elements, and the bodies formed from this matter are invisible for the human eye. The ETHEREAL PHYSICS it occupy with the study of the ethereal matters, but which was abandoned in the XX century, because in 1905 A.Einstein excludes the ether.
sandustanBrasov 8 months ago
• SandustanBrasov But the ETHER is a physical reality constituted from a very small matter, invisible for human eye, and is formed from atoms more small with 7...8 order of dimension than the atoms of the chemical elements. The matter of the ether penetrate in all the visible bodies and is the physical matter which fills both the interplanetary space and the interatomic space. The ether is a matter with mass and weigth, being subdued and she the action of the universal attraction law.
sandustanBrasov 8 months ago
• SandustanBrasov
After Mendeleev's opinion is possible and necessary the extension of periodical system for other size's order - more small- of the ethereal matter particles. About the absolute vacuum space, M.Faraday had the certitude that it doesn't exist, and it exists only an incomplte vacuum whose spatial magnetic state is of the most importance for the natures phenomenons.
sandustanBrasov 8 months ago
• SandustanBrasov
D.I.Mendeleev had shown through 1860:"Studying the ether which penetrate in all the bodies and asking myself the question: from what is formed this ether's mass, I had admitted the idea that theirs atoms, or his matter represent the primary matter, from which are formed all atoms. The existence to the one light mass, to the one light substance and less of chemical forces, is possibly but, is even necessary".
sandustanBrasov 8 months ago
• SandustanBrasov
The Dutch astronomer Jan Oort from Leyde university, determines in 1965 the density of the matter in the Sun's neighbourhood, of 0.10 solar mass on the cubic parsec. The his conclusion was that in our galaxy exist not an invizible zone(without matter). The Milky Way and our neighbour Andromeda it approach one of another, with a speed of 93 km/s, and not it remove how it believe that make other galaxies.
sandustanBrasov 8 months ago
SandustanBrasov If in 1905 Einstein excludes the ether from physics, viz excludes the intergalactic matter, then the his fanatical disciples, the his theoretical parrots, arrive with the rlativity theory at Big bang, at black holes, holes of worm, at singularity and today at the travel in time. Thus, the great explosion of George Gamov and his follows R.A.Ipfer and R.C.Hermann become cosmological standardized theory, but which is one great bluff!
sandustanBrasov 8 months ago
SandustanBrasov
In 1930..1935 apple of discord was the photon of light. General opinion of the physicists had adopted the viewpoint which unholded not the existence's idea in flight to photon.Thus they had allowed the photon without mass.If the photon has not mass, he can't interact with nothing on trajectory and the light speed remain constant.In place let to consider that the photons lose the speed on way following them interaction with the meeted matter, they had set the Universe let dilate.
sandustanBrasov 8 months ago
SandustanBrasov
In accordance with Hubble's law for two heavenly bodies founded at the same distance from Earth, the constant must needs let has the same value.The three astronomers for respective measurement, they had fixed about 120 spirally galaxies founded in average at the same distance, but in different regions of the supergalaxy.The result was surprising: resulted that the speed of moving off of the galaxies in first region was of 4796 km/s face of 481 km/s for those from second region.
sandustanBrasov 8 months ago
• SandustanBrasov
The subsequent investigations, effected in continuous with test all more profound in the dept of the Universe, proved that the value of the Hubble's constant, which bind the speed of moving off with the distance, it cipher in the round a 100 km/s on megaparsec. But in the year 1973, three astronomers: V.C.Rubin, J.S.Rubin and W.K.Ford from observatory Lick from California succeeded let shake in serious mode the infallibility of the Hubble's constant.
sandustanBrasov 8 months ago
• SandustanBrasov
In 1929, Hubble and Humason had established that the bright rays which come from a galaxy at a terrestrial observer it manifest in the spectral image to the this galaxy through the displacement of the length of wave, towards the red domain of the spectrum, and the disparity is with so much more great how the transmitting source is more remote.
sandustanBrasov 8 months ago
• SandustanBrasov
Face of the initial surprise, at the finding to one Universe in expansion, even Hubble to inclined let explain the displacement towards red, as a tiredness of the light on the immense way which separate her of galaxy which emited her; can be a loss of energy because the nature of the light and the interaction with the matter meeted in way, which give a displacement towards red more great and the Hubble's constant will grow.
sandustanBrasov 8 months ago
• SandustanBrasov
Today in front of our eyes and of the observation apparatuss it succedes all evolution phases of the celestial bodies, stars and galaxies. An evidence that the Universe doesn't seems to have an explosive beginning, and doesn't seems to have ever an end in the his entirely. The facts demonstrates that in Universe the cyclical creation has place continuously in certains parts and can has not place total creation in the same time in all the mass of the Universe.
sandustanBrasov 8 months ago
• SandustanBrasov
The discovery from 1972 about quasar 3C279, this concrete evidence, guides in physics at the breakdown myth as 300000 km/s as maximum speed; guides in astronomy to the Hubble;s law revision, the law expressed by an empirical relation bound by 13 miliards of years how it considers at taht time the Universe age; and the famous Big bang, the great explosion of George Gamov let be not anything than a great bluff!
sandustanBrasov 8 months ago
• SandustanBrasov
The fact seeming strange, after 12 days it take back with care the observations, and it confirm the first results. Moreover, extrapolating the dates towards past the astronomers had arrived at the conclusion that the two parts of the quasar had started let it separate towards the end of the year 1967, date at which the quasar passed through one activity of radioemission very intense. Was the moment when the quasar 3C279 it was broken at least in two parts.
sandustanBrasov 8 months ago
• SandustanBrasov
• The both radiotelescopes was oriented towards the 3C279 quasar at which was observed the two double punctual emission very near. After four months it resume the measurements about quasar. Leaving from the period's enlargement to the fringes interference, it deduce and the angular distance between the two source. How the time in which the source had removed was known, it was calculated the speed of moving off and which was of TEN TIMES more great than the light speed!
sandustanBrasov 8 months ago
• SandustanBrasov
The quasars are quasistellary bodies which emits intense radiowave and radiation in ultravilet and infrared.The surprise to come from quasar 3C279 from two parts of its resulted in following explosion from 1967 and which it had continuated to displace in space with a speed of ten times more great than the light speed. In 1972 an american astronomers team guided of I.Shapiro had coupled two radiotelescopes: one from Haystack-Massachussets with one from Goldstone-California.
sandustanBrasov 8 months ago
• SandustanBrasov
Today, on measure that the theory advances from classic mechanics to the quantum mechanics the particle and wave are gradual dematerialize.The modern physics is blocked by enounciation of some laws and mistaken principles as: relativity theory;Hubble's low, poastulation that the atom can't emit and absorb radiations continuously, admitting the postulate what claims the photons without mass a.s.o.These guide us at supernatural, and at the technical and technological blockage.
sandustanBrasov 8 months ago
• SandustanBrasov
Nikola Tesla argued that:"I hold that the space cannot be curved, for the simple reason that it can has not properties. Of properties it can speak only when it work with the matter which fill up the space. The empty space it can not curve because - something - can not action about - nothing". This relativity proceed from a philosophical direction, on which A.Einstein produce her when he was found in a state of technical and religious confusion.
sandustanBrasov 8 months ago
• SandustanBrasov
The scientist man Nikola Tesla showed that the relativity theory was the creation of the great philosopher Ruder Boscovich and was emited with over 200 years ago, dealt with relativity, including to so-called time-space continuum, and from this taken and A.Einstein a great part and alter it.
sandustanBrasov 8 months ago
• SandustanBrasov
Einstein considers the gravity as a property of the space and not in the least as a property of the matter which fill up this space. The relativity theory of the Einstein is a geometrization of the space. Leibnitz(1646...1716) German scientist, forerunner of the mathematical logic, through the denial the newtonian space-time is and he a forerunner of the Einstein's relativity.
sandustanBrasov 8 months ago
• SandustanBrasov
Were introduced in physics the infinite mass phantoms, the infinite energy phantoms and the infinite impulse phantoms when a body or particle would touch the light speed in vacuum. Today we know that many particles were accelerate unill at the light speed, others had arrived with this speed from cosmos, but at none grow up not at infinite or near of infinite the mass, the energy or the impulse.
sandustanBrasov 8 months ago