@jorasave The test was to a) set a baseline for the actual dynamics involved in using this particular derail geometry, b) text the unit for strength and durability relative to theoretical determinations, and c) determine the what areas need to be improved.
What I find interesting is how the second axle skid and then spit the derailer out the back, and the third axle did the same. It was only tight for the first one. Kinda makes me wonder if it would survive the second truck, let alone any successive units or cars.
@kleetus92 If you look closely that happens on all three wheel strikes. Common with lower-speed derailments. The wheel lacks the velocity to maintain a full-pass trajectory upon exit. That is, the rate of wheel decent is too great for the longitudinal velocity to keep the wheel flange clear of the derail. You may also note that this movement is withheld to one tie space; by design. Yes, it does survive the second truck and successive cars.
A derail is not used to combat "normal circumstances" like a loco not automatically deammanning. It is a safety device for when all else fails. Usually, the danger is not from a faulty locomotive. 90%+ of the time the failure lies in the operators. Failure to properly chock/brake static cars or locos (run aways), pushing in too close to buildings or work areas, or such. You never "want" to derail anything but it is always the last resort.
You forget to mention derails that are used to protect crews themselves. Such as the blue flag type which are placed when working on or around a locomotive. Those types are used to derail a locomotive to prevent it from running into a pit where crews are working, or even situations where the track gang are doing maintenence.
It was actually an SD45T-2M. Those assholes were me and the crew at TTCI. Those "assholes" at TTCI have been the single most pioneering group to enhance the safety and performance of the rail industry you apparently love. So, show some respect and cork it.
Those people also crashed my favorite locomotive a F40PH, This data helps them understand how to make things safer and they DO get results the first test was a cab car vs a F40PH with the cab car ending up getting ripped to apart, if that was a real train crash almost if not every one in that car would be dead, the F40PH received mild damage.
@Ham549 The next time they tried the test with cars they had modified based on the data they had collected the car stayed intact instead of ripping open, thus making it very survivable if it had been a real train crash.
Why would anyone want to derail a train? It would take several days and several man hours to re-rail a train, depending on how bad the derailment is the cars or locomotives might not even be re-railed at all.
You must be a bit new to the concept of a derail. There are many reasons for using derails. One way to think about them is they are the ultimate lock-out/tag-out devices for a track zone. They are also used for the final word in anti-fouling And other assorted reasons. Again, they are LAST RESORT devices and are mandated by the FRA and OSHA. They are very common rail devices.
its happens very infrequently, but it does happen. there are 2 derails on our DM&E line in town, and they do their jobs when need be. there was a train about 8 years ago doing about 12 MPH that jumped a switch, and the derail did its job in that case, no one was hurt or killed, but the train stopped instead of continuing into a building as it would have if the derail was not there.
I think installing a derailer should be last resort for low speed runaway trains. A train that is 90 to 105 mph, I would not bother installing a derailer at that speed. Once a train hits a sharp curve, it will derail itself anyway. Not every train is just the locomotive with no cars.
It IS the last resort. If a derail has been struck MANY warnings went unheeded. Correct, the number of cars dramatically alters the dynamics of the derailment. Note that our tests were not just a locomotive even though thats all you see in the video. Also note that these are ultra-lightweight portable derails designed for low speed operation. Anything short of a switch point derail is not substantial enough for mainline speeds.
There are many ways to stop rolling stock. A derail of any type is a last-resort device. When all else failed, the derail should take it off. Especially if it's a switch point derail.
This device not only saves lives it also saves equipment, a train rolling onto a active track can cause a full out train wreck, it's better to haul your equipment to the repair shop then the scrap yard.
In conductor school for CSX, they showed us some footage of a cut of about 20 cars rolling at a pretty good speed, then derailing and pilling up on top of each other. It was an awesome sight, I'd love to see it again.
To see If it can with stand the pressure of it
Fan2La 1 month ago
someone please, what is this test for? test the wheels hardness or the suspension really like to know thanks ..
jorasave 6 months ago
@jorasave The test was to a) set a baseline for the actual dynamics involved in using this particular derail geometry, b) text the unit for strength and durability relative to theoretical determinations, and c) determine the what areas need to be improved.
derailexpert 1 month ago
I noticed right when the 3rd wheel derails, it looks like one of the fans falls out of place in the screen area
RailsandRoads 9 months ago
Apparently Bin Laden found this video.
zimtower 9 months ago
Ha, looks like that unit has derailed at least once before
KinetikPlayground 10 months ago
What I find interesting is how the second axle skid and then spit the derailer out the back, and the third axle did the same. It was only tight for the first one. Kinda makes me wonder if it would survive the second truck, let alone any successive units or cars.
kleetus92 1 year ago
@kleetus92 If you look closely that happens on all three wheel strikes. Common with lower-speed derailments. The wheel lacks the velocity to maintain a full-pass trajectory upon exit. That is, the rate of wheel decent is too great for the longitudinal velocity to keep the wheel flange clear of the derail. You may also note that this movement is withheld to one tie space; by design. Yes, it does survive the second truck and successive cars.
derailexpert 11 months ago
@derailexpert Fair enough.
kleetus92 11 months ago
they use it at yard exits to derail runaway trains. prevent them from getting into the mainline.
kelvintwt 1 year ago
This videos are fun to watch! It must have been a pain to re-rail everything after each of these tests.
sforzando1213 1 year ago
Actually it USUALLY isn't too bad with a big enough crane are a set of rerailers.
derailexpert 1 year ago 2
why would u want to derail a train as long as most locomotive will automatically stop if there is no input from the engineer for a few seconds.
optmius99 2 years ago
A derail is not used to combat "normal circumstances" like a loco not automatically deammanning. It is a safety device for when all else fails. Usually, the danger is not from a faulty locomotive. 90%+ of the time the failure lies in the operators. Failure to properly chock/brake static cars or locos (run aways), pushing in too close to buildings or work areas, or such. You never "want" to derail anything but it is always the last resort.
derailexpert 2 years ago 3
You forget to mention derails that are used to protect crews themselves. Such as the blue flag type which are placed when working on or around a locomotive. Those types are used to derail a locomotive to prevent it from running into a pit where crews are working, or even situations where the track gang are doing maintenence.
darkyoda 2 years ago
Is it possible to use this at higher speeds?
bekkinkannu 2 years ago
Absolutely.
derailexpert 2 years ago
Uh no, every time I hear of them trying to be used at high speed the train just clips them off and keeps going.
Ham549 1 year ago
Didn't say "high speed"... Just "higher" speed. If you want a "high speed" derailer you'll need a switch-point derail. Not what this is intended for.
derailexpert 1 year ago
thx for the info.
optmius99 2 years ago
THEY USED A SD40T-2!>:-( ASS HOLES!
MilwaukeeSDman 2 years ago
It was actually an SD45T-2M. Those assholes were me and the crew at TTCI. Those "assholes" at TTCI have been the single most pioneering group to enhance the safety and performance of the rail industry you apparently love. So, show some respect and cork it.
derailexpert 2 years ago
O Sorry. I feel really bad. I am not very good at engine Classifacation. My mistake. BTW is it ex DRGW?
MilwaukeeSDman 2 years ago
I can't say that I know if it was an ex Denver and Rio Grande Western piece of stock.
derailexpert 2 years ago
Those people also crashed my favorite locomotive a F40PH, This data helps them understand how to make things safer and they DO get results the first test was a cab car vs a F40PH with the cab car ending up getting ripped to apart, if that was a real train crash almost if not every one in that car would be dead, the F40PH received mild damage.
Ham549 1 year ago
@Ham549 The next time they tried the test with cars they had modified based on the data they had collected the car stayed intact instead of ripping open, thus making it very survivable if it had been a real train crash.
Ham549 1 year ago
Why would this be used
countryboy44555 2 years ago
You can think of it as a lock-out-tag-out device for the railroad industry.
derailexpert 2 years ago
Comment removed
jdmars02 2 years ago
They already buy it. CSX, NSRR, BNSF, YP, and many short lines have purchased them.
derailexpert 2 years ago
OCHOCINCO
jdmars02 2 years ago
Why would anyone want to derail a train? It would take several days and several man hours to re-rail a train, depending on how bad the derailment is the cars or locomotives might not even be re-railed at all.
Nathanrailfan 2 years ago
You must be a bit new to the concept of a derail. There are many reasons for using derails. One way to think about them is they are the ultimate lock-out/tag-out devices for a track zone. They are also used for the final word in anti-fouling And other assorted reasons. Again, they are LAST RESORT devices and are mandated by the FRA and OSHA. They are very common rail devices.
derailexpert 2 years ago
its happens very infrequently, but it does happen. there are 2 derails on our DM&E line in town, and they do their jobs when need be. there was a train about 8 years ago doing about 12 MPH that jumped a switch, and the derail did its job in that case, no one was hurt or killed, but the train stopped instead of continuing into a building as it would have if the derail was not there.
thetrainman407 2 years ago
I think installing a derailer should be last resort for low speed runaway trains. A train that is 90 to 105 mph, I would not bother installing a derailer at that speed. Once a train hits a sharp curve, it will derail itself anyway. Not every train is just the locomotive with no cars.
Nathanrailfan 2 years ago
It IS the last resort. If a derail has been struck MANY warnings went unheeded. Correct, the number of cars dramatically alters the dynamics of the derailment. Note that our tests were not just a locomotive even though thats all you see in the video. Also note that these are ultra-lightweight portable derails designed for low speed operation. Anything short of a switch point derail is not substantial enough for mainline speeds.
derailexpert 2 years ago
something fell at 0:06
Alexking99 2 years ago
I'm pretty sure it was the radiators. I didn't check it at the time; but I'm pretty sure.
derailexpert 2 years ago
it was the radiator fan shroud
csxt4685 2 years ago
Is there no less damaging, costly way to stop a train or runaway railcar?
robertgift 2 years ago
There are many ways to stop rolling stock. A derail of any type is a last-resort device. When all else failed, the derail should take it off. Especially if it's a switch point derail.
derailexpert 2 years ago
This device not only saves lives it also saves equipment, a train rolling onto a active track can cause a full out train wreck, it's better to haul your equipment to the repair shop then the scrap yard.
Ham549 1 year ago 8
Wish there were a way to slow and stop a railcar without putting it on the ground.
Like something that would squeeze against the flange and stop it.
Buthat would be too expensive and not portable.
Also, a heavy car or cars may force their way through.
robertgift 1 year ago
Now..do it at 50 M.P.H!
RerailMe 2 years ago
If we could find a place that would let us we would have. :)
derailexpert 2 years ago
Why do they put this on the tracks? Is it for like if there is a tracks missing ahead or something this would just slighty derail it?
InformationCenter 2 years ago
There are many OSHA and FRA reasons to use a derail. For the most part you can consider it a lock-out tag-out device for a track section.
derailexpert 2 years ago
look at the radiators flying around in the engine compartment
1fiddy3 2 years ago
thanks derailexpert.
myday16 2 years ago
Interesting!
FlyBikes089 2 years ago
Holy crap I'd be scared!
Bus7777 2 years ago
The locomotive is TTCI's DTFR 2003 class C-C locomotive. It is an EMD SD45T-2M tipping the scales at approximately 383,775lbs.
derailexpert 2 years ago
what kind of locomotive is it?
myday16 2 years ago
Can someone locate the video GTN3703 mentions? We'd love to see it, or something like it. Thanks.
okzoia 2 years ago
In conductor school for CSX, they showed us some footage of a cut of about 20 cars rolling at a pretty good speed, then derailing and pilling up on top of each other. It was an awesome sight, I'd love to see it again.
GTN3703 3 years ago 4