What kind of idiot is this guy? You have limited obligations as the driver.. You are obligated to provide a drivers license, and depending on local laws proof of insurance and registration. Beyond that you have no obligations. As a passenger you have no obligations to provide id. The officer must have a reasonable articulable suspicion that you have have/are/will commit a crime to trigger the requirement for identification..
He just said what's rights you don't have and one obligation. What's The law that states you have to identify yourself? What's the courts definition of identify and yourself? What's legal definition of obligation? That was just another fluff peace. That's fine.
BIGGEST PROBLEM OUTSIDE OF CAR - A lot of times I go running at night, cops often stop me and obviously lie saying something like "we got a few calls of someone stealing from cars, kinda described what your wearing" ... I know they are lying to get my info... In what legal way can I tell them to fuck off?
@jsc2385 hahah listen kid, when your a man you don't need the help of anyone just because they have a shiney metal badge, it doesn't mean shit to me. I can handle myself, Ive been stabbed and shot at and I came out fine by myself. No help needed here! I'm a MAN...
@OooHesGood ALL COPS LIE! ALL JEWS are greedy... All Hispanics are illegal immigrants, All Asians are bad drivers! All Black are Gangbangers! You tell 'em! I had no idea you are immortal! Are you proud of being shot? Badge of honor! "I've been shot and didn't die! Yes!" A real MAN admits that he's mortal..dosn't blame the WORLD's problems on them fuckin police
@jsc2385 Did I blame anything on anyone, did I say I was proud or did I use an experience as an example? I simply started by complaining about cops bothering me while I am jogging. Your the one who ASKED ME a question about what would I do if I got robbed at night, and I told you I DONT FEAR that kinda stuff... Perhaps you live in fear, I dont know but I live in "the now" and have always handled myself well in those situations. I came here for advice not to argue with you so bug off...
bullshit. this video is pure statutory bullshit. they assume you are involved in commercial activity. the Adams Family turns in their grave. This "dean" is a dupe for the feds. don't believe any of this crap.
But you're not hearing what he is saying. The words coming out of his mouth I would agree on how to be stopped. But what he is not saying is that, if you're pulled over for ANY reason, without cause, this fool is basically saying "obligated". That's the same as me pulling you over and demading your ID for no reason. Would you do it? I would think..no.. You have no reason to show me as there was no cause. That's all I was pointing out. He even says " Justified or not" or probable cause or not.
@larrybeme misunderstood the video...Police don't make random stops.. they have to have lawful reason to do so..Even if the "CITIZEN" Feels the stop was unlawful, the citizen can't refuse to be detained... Whether the stop was a traffic stop or street stop... the officer(s) must have justification
@larrybeme No sir. What this man speaks is common sense. If you have a problem with the citation or whatever else, deal with it in court. Which would you prefer, dealing with it in court or being beaten, possibly tazered (or worse) AND being arrested? I would rather keep my ego in check and deal with it later than to cop an attitude (pun intended) and be arrested. Either way, you'd end up dealing with it in court anyway. What this man speaks is simple common sense. He's absolutely right.
this guy is a schill... YOU DO NOT HAVE TO IDENTIFY YOURSELF... YOU HAVE A RIGHT TO A JURY IF THE POTENTIAL FINE IS OVER $20 ...DO NOT SAY ANYTHING...1ST AMENDMENT SAYS YOU CAN SAY WHAT YOU WANT...5TH AMENDMENT SAYS YOU DONT HAVE TO SAY ANYTHING... IF PULLED OVER ASSERT YOUR RIGHTS BY REMINDING THEM YOU ARE COOPERATING LAWFULLY BY NOT INCRIMINATING YOURSELF WITH WORDS AND REPEATEDLY ASK IF YOU ARE FREE TO GO...BY MY COUNT THAT IS TWO THINGS NOT 3... THIS GUY MAKES ME ILL...
@itsjustadamnedname ...There are no FEDERAL laws requiring you to identify yourself, but laws in some states require you to, particularly when being identified for suspicious activity. Like, say, when you're being pulled over? You also don't have the right to a lawyer or jury for misdemeanors or minor offenses, such as the majority of traffic violations. You're pulled over, they write you a ticket and send you on your way, NO BIG DEAL. Stop violating laws and you wouldn't have to deal with them.
@nicoleandkent and as long as the 5th amendment remains part of the constitution those laws in those states are not constitutional... You give them your name and you accept their jurisdiction... I will violate any law I don't agree with...that is called freedom... have a nice day!
@itsjustadamnedname Also, violating any law you don't feel like abiding by isn't freedom, it's criminal. Sure, if the law is unjust, by all means. Learn what it ACTUALLY unconstitutional; just because you don't like it doesn't mean it's actually wrong. With a holier than thou attitude like that, you're going to spend a lot of time in the justice system. And thank god for that, the less nutjobs like you on the street, the better off I am.
@nicoleandkent (Black's Law 1st Edition) FREE. 1. Unconstrained ; having power to follow the dictates of his own will. Not subject to the dominion of another. Not compelled to involuntary servitude.but, yea call me a nutjob that will make your position more credible... I am not sure what you mean by holier than thou... I am not the one with the superiority complex or displaced ego... but thanks...
@nicoleandkent I would post the definition for Common law also but that would take many of these tiny comment boxes... and I am sure you can go to your local university and find a copy for yourself...
you obviously are not familiar with the 6th amendment... or the meaning of the word "ALL" "In *all* criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right to a speedy and public trial, by an impartial jury of the State and district wherein the crime shall have been committed...and to have the Assistance of Counsel for his defence"
@izaakb You are correct... they are Civil law fraud... but that didnt stop them from merging the traffic and criminal courts... that doesnt stop them from issuing a warrant and arresting you LIKE a criminal if you fail to appear/pay their bribe... Traffic citations are revenue generation vehicles for the government corporations... we pay them out of fear of arrest and that is extortion, nothing more...
@izaakb The 6th Amendment in our constitution guarantees the right to be confronted by a witness. The officer is the witness, not the ticket or notes written on the ticket. If the officer has to read from the ticket to testify, he or she is not providing information based on their recollection as a witness. Without independent recollection, the officer is not considered competent to testify against you in the eye of the law. It's then grounds for dismissal...
@izaakb "...a case may arise where there is a substantial allegation that furnishing identity at the time of a stop would have given the police a link in the chain of evidence needed to convict the individual of a separate offense. In that case, the court can then consider whether the privilege applies, and, if the Fifth Amendment has been violated, what remedy must follow. We need not resolve those questions here..." — Hiibel v. Sixth Judicial District Court of Nevada, 542 U.S. at 19
@itsjustadamnedname You can challenge any ticket you receive but that's before a judge; you only have the right to a trial before a jury for a prosecution that would warrant 6+ months of prison time. Not traffic violations, like in the video. Also, the 5th amendment protects against self incrimination and double jeopardy. Maybe you meant the 4th amendment, against unreasonable search and seizure? Note the term unreasonable. You do something wrong, you get pulled over, that's reason enough.
@nicoleandkent If we got a Lawyer to write some legislation that says commenting on youtube is illegal tomorrow and it got sandwiched in some bill and was passed would you follow it? what if they could put you in jail for 5 months and 27 days? that would be totally fine with you, wouldn't it? I was born into this system... I never consented to it and I never will... all humans are created equal unless you're a judge or a cop or a shill... that's wrong on MANY levels...
@itsjustadamnedname most states do in fact have a legal requirement to identify yourself when requested by an officer, plenty of courts have indicated that identifying yourself is not testimony against yourself (unless you're a fugitive from justice). Thus, no 5th amendment right involved. Otherwise, you don't have to talk or answer questions beyond providing the driver license, registration and insurance.
@izaakb You CAN refuse to identify yourself based on 5th amendment, you can expect to be taken into custody, and you CAN expect to win in court... most dont want to go to jail so they comply with unconstitutional statutes... Aaron Russo made an interesting comment once about the mafia (I mean the government)... you pay them because if you dont you're going to get hurt... not necessarily because it's right...be a good slave and do what you're told... including continue to disagree with me...
@john17972 wierd... I thought the exact same thing before I read any comments. This guy says your obligated to identify yourself AND cooperate. I would say yes to the first part, but not to cooperating.
The best advice is to say and do as little as possible which is pretty much just identifying yourself and then remain silent.
You've contributed with less than nothing to this subject. This doesn't speak very well of this Law School. This is basically telling you "bend over and put the vaseline when approached by a cop". Flex Your Rights pretty much educates you about what to do. Go check it out.
Well this was poor. Give a COP the license and reg. But never, ever answer any questions. And never consent to a search. Period. And never fall for that "where are you coming from, and where are you going" crap. Most likely, he is fishing. If you have done something wrong, take the ticket, and that's that. Do not be nasty, but assert your rights. They can not say that the see something, or smell something, and use that as an excuse to make a search. So keep car clean.
Show me the law were im obligated to identify myself. As a matter of fact why dont you show me your LICENSE to practice law, and im not referring to your bar card.
If anyone here can provide me with a legitimate source of authority to debunk my claims, I'll retract these statements; otherwise they stand as fact. Legitimate = constitutional and preceding rights to persons and property. To further establish this context, define these words: republic sovereign lawful unlawful abrogate right privilege statutory (very important..) ...and do a search for, and study, the source and order of authority in law.
Everyone: Ignore the shill/troll badguydown19..he's the perfect example of one who paid to surf and spam. His arguments, such as they are, are without merit and are not even prima facie evidence of truth.
NO TASERS for law enforcement. Only officers with advanced training and experience should be allowed to carry firearms. This will force law enforcement to develope their communication skills and their interactions with the public. It will stop them from working from an ego and power hungry position. They will have to work on a much different level if they do not have tasers and immediate access to firearms. They would be less bullying and it would also help their public image.
@YoureAlwaysRight I concur, but that opens a can of worms. Being able to defend your self/family and your property entitles you to possess modern or commonly confronted/conventional weaponry...so should cops. However much I dislike it.
But, if you understand the purpose of a police officer, they are peace officers in their primary capacity, and law enforcement secondarily. As long as you state your peace and immediately open dialogue in a peaceful Sovereign capacity, they stay peace officers.
@YoureAlwaysRight I know this because I have had lengthy conversations with peace officers (sheriffs, city police, and my uncle who is a Washington state trooper)...they prefer to be peace officers and not have to resort to threat of force (which, if anyone understands, creates a problem in judicial process...unless you have already committed a crime or are in the process of committing a crime, they have no authority to threaten or use force. Period.)
@rotnflesh 2nd)I also think the taser makes an inferior officer with less peple skills and less ability to deal with situations without using force.It becomes too easy to use and officers begin to rely on the taser to get them out of a difficult situation. There are peace officers that have been in law enforcement for years and agree that guys are too quick to use the taser.These officers talk about command presence,community based policing and people skills to deal with lower level problems.
@YoureAlwaysRight The problem with law enforcement and the use of deadly or dangerous weapons for unnecessary situations comes from the individual who commits it, not the weapons themselves...
He who seeks a reason for everything, subverts reason. 2 Co. 75.
Many police officers (not a huge portion, but enough) should not be police officers; simple as that. It's not a history of abuse, it's the propensity for abuse.
Instead of resorting to weapons when it is almost too late, instead of giving everyone the benefit of the doubt, these specific officers immediately wield their tools of force when confronted with a complicated situation. Maybe 5% of all people who have to deal with a police officer actually do anything to justify the use of these weapons; many of them do not.
I read a story awhile back of a police officer tasing a 10 year old girl because she was "unruly and wild".
The gist was that the parents could not get her to go to bed at bedtime, and they called the police not knowing what to do. Officer showed up, girl thrashed, officer tazed. That is not a lawful use, and just one potential example.
@rotnflesh We had an IDIOT COP here that a few years ago, wrote a 5 year old a ticket for hitting his car. The COP was later fired, but it took 3 years and going to court. Said that he wanted to teach the kid a lesson. Where do they come up with these guys? And what is on that pscy test they take? Seem like they need to redo it.
@RCK502 There was a study done that indicated the average police officer's IQ is 110. Now, I am not a strong believer in IQ testing, considering there can be and are exceptions to the rule...but when the average test concludes that police officers are not very bright, it points to a failing of legislation. Lower IQs leave little room for creative thinking; they blindly follow their codes and procedures without regard to the CONSTITUTION.
@rotnflesh 1st) It's tough to get my entire message on here with limited font/character space allowed. I'm all for civilians protecting themselves and their families. I'm not suggesting civillians not be armed, I think more civillians should be armed and fewer peace officers. Not all officers should be armed. It should be select officers who would have this responsibility. I do think the taser should be gotten rid of entirely, it violates the 8th ammendment (cruel/unusual punishment).
@rotnflesh 1st) It's tough to get my entire message on here with limited font/character space allowed. I'm all for civilians protecting themselves and their families. I'm not suggesting civillians not be armed, I think more civillians should be armed and fewer peace officers. Not all officers should be armed. It should be select officers who would have this responsibility. I do think the taser should be gotten rid of entirely, it violates the 8th ammendment (cruel/unusual punishment).
If I dressed up as a cop went on highway roads in a ford crown vic, and wore a uniform complete with the usual gear, I could turn on my lights and pull everybody over I chose. I could ask for ID and SSN's and threaten people's rights and property if they didn't submit to my agenda. How would the people distinguish the fraud cop, and shouldn't the people be able to ask the charge or reason they've been detained, shouldn't the cop prove he is lawfully able to conduct law.
@zeppelinman07 Police officers are mandated to provide their business card and badge number upon demand by a member of the public. A fraudulent cop would not have them or, upon calling his bluff, would abandon the scene.
Even so, a proper police officer would act in his peace officer capacity if his/her initial impression of you if that of a peaceful sovereign exercising rights with full respect to public peace.
Is this guy a professor of tax law? I'm amazed at the amount of bad advice out there by law "professionals." Lawyers will rarely give you sound advice because they want you to become dependent on them--the same way that doctors don't want easy cures for diseases. Other than giving your basic driving information, you do not have to answer any questions, possibly incriminating yourself, ie., "being cooperative." It's called "5th Ammendment Rights." Maybe this professor should Google it? Geez!!
@lizard944 You are so right! My god this professor sucks. He just gave us, as you said, basic driving info. and procedure (any county clerk could have told us what the professor told us...geez that pisses me off). The title to this vid. is our legal rights when pulled over by cop. The professor didn't tell us one right! You right, he never heard of 5th amendment! Look at this professor...doesn't he look like an ex-cop??? I bet he was a cop who later became a law professor.
So this has become a Nazi country to live in. What if you are parked off road and the officer is asking for I.D.'s of all adults and your children's names, birth dates, socials...etc?
If you are pulled over, you are required to show license, registration, and proof of insurance. Other than that, you have all other rights including the one you should always use: the right to remain silent.
You do NOT have to cooperate with the police, and no good lawyer would recommend that you do.
“...we are of the opinion that there is a clear distinction in this particular between an individual and a corporation, and that the latter has no right to refuse to submit its books and papers for an examination at the suit of the state. The individual may stand upon his constitutional rights as a citizen. He is entitled to carry on his private business in his own way. His power to contract is unlimited.
He owes no duty to the state or to his neighbors to divulge his business, or to open his doors to an investigation, so far as it may tend to incriminate him. He owes no such duty to the state, since he receives nothing therefrom, beyond the protection of his life and property. His rights are such as existed by the law of the land long antecedent to the organization of the state, and can only be taken from him by due process of law, and in accordance with the Constitution.
Among his rights are a refusal to incriminate himself, and the immunity of himself and his property from arrest and seizure except under a warrant of the law. He owes nothing to the public so long as he does not trespass upon their rights. Upon the other hand, the corporation is a creature of the state...” Hale v. Henkel. 201 U.S. 43 at 47 (1905).
Simple statement to cop: I have reserved all my inalienable rights without prejudice and stand on Common Law in Common Law Jurisdiction.
@badguydown19 After being arrested, I would object to jurisdiction (as I have before) and prevent an arraignment from proceeding. I would never see a jail cell and, if I ever were to see a jail cell, I would bill any and all public servants for their illegal and unlawful/unwarranted detention of myself to the tune of $300/hour *about what a lawyer costs* and/or file civil charges of kidnapping and extortion. Anything signed is under threat/duress and coercion.
The billing comes from my notarized "fee schedule" and kidnapping/extorion charges under U.S.C. Title 18 §241and §242; Conspiracy to Deprive Citizens of Rights and Deprivation of Right under Color of Law.
If you're a cop, you're one of the typically uneducated ones.
in the court of law you always have the right to have it heard by jury unless your referring us to admiralty law sir which does not apply to a sovereign i'll take my common law please
There is a clear distinction between an automobile and a motor vehicle. An automobile has been defined as:
"The word 'automobile' connotes a pleasure vehicle designed for the transportation of persons on highways." American Mutual Liability Ins. Co. vs. Chaput, 60 A.2d 118, 120; 95 NH 200.
While the distinction is made clear between the two as the courts have stated:
"A motor vehicle or automobile for hire is a motor vehicle, other than an automobile stage, ...
"The use of the automobile as a necessary adjunct to the earning of a livelihood in modern life requires us in the interest of realism to conclude that the RIGHT to use an automobile on the public highways
partakes of the nature of a liberty within the meaning of the Constitutional guarantees. . ." Berberian v. Lussier (1958) 139 A2d 869
"Motor vehicle" means every description or other contrivance propelled or drawn by mechanical power and used for commercial purposes on the highways in the transportation of passengers, or passengers and property.
"Used for commercial purposes" means the carriage of persons or property for any fare, fee, rate, charge or other considerations, or directly or indirectly in connection with any business, or other undertaking intended for profit.
OK here we go again that doesn't apply to Springfield police ,the RULE they go by is you show id or go to jail you film you go to jail you audio you go to jail you miss mandatory meeting you go to jail. so please explain that the law your talking about doesn't apply to Springfield, police have absolute power over us we have rules to go by, police did away with rights many years ago the school teaches the rules that police tell us to go by the children know only of rules and know nothing else.
Sounds like a lot of you who are posting negative "I don't have to comply with shit" comments are only going to create further problems for you when you do have contact with a cop. I'm all for people knowing and exercising their rights, but dammit, if you're going to go that route, know your rights. Most states do have an "obligation to identify" rule concerning traffic stops. Now I'm not saying go along with whatever the officer asks, but just flat out not complying will not help, guaranteed.
You might as well say you are drunk as a skunk, just robbed a liquor store and you are armed and dangerous. Just throw your clients under the bus...Genius! Is there a points system in Mass. that rewards arrests and convictions to lawyers?
I should shut up that will be next. A government for the people by the people. Remember those words. They have been forgotten and are becoming more and more important. When the common man can't understand law what good is it?
This video is a complete stream of lies. Its title is intentionally misleading. Feel free to ignore this. I'm a little surprised this video hasn't gotten someone fired.
This video is total bs. You have the right to refuse any search to have the right to remain silent. REmaining silent is ALWAYS a right reguardless if it is in coorperation with the officer. Cops are paid to help put YOU in jail. Give ur lic and regs. When asked question remind the officer all of your information is on your lic. When asked to search tell the officer i refuse consent in any situation reguardless of guilt. REmint the officer you will press charges if nothing is found.
not me! I get out of the car, say "hey man, who the frick are you...show me your badge ... are you one of those super gay cops or just a regular gay cop?" then he'll usually say something & I'll insult him at that time....
remember attorneys work for the court..duhhhhh you dont have to identify yourself... wow this guy just wants you to get into the court of contracts... lol this guy is a joke.. he's dosent want you to stand up for your rights he wants you to come and pay him and the court........ i would never have an attorney
He poses a question and doesnt answer it...or, maybe he does answer it by implying you have no rights...of course the truth is you do have rights and this guy doesnt want you to know what they are....geez, this boy is a blatant liar, or he is dumber than he looks!!!
thanks no help what so ever.... people you have the common law right to travel. only lawfull reason to pull you over would be if they seen you or had reports you have breached the peace!!!!
Police can arrest you and/or demand your ID if they "suspect" you have commited a crime. Suspician is enough for them to enforce this issue. It does not need to be a carved in stone obvious offence. They should though explain the offence you are suspected of commiting first
Oh Excuse me?? You DO have the right to an attorney for a traffic citation: especially if you are NOT guilty of speeding. He dont know his ass from a hole in the ground.
actually, no. You do not have a 6th amendment right to an attorney for a traffic violation. Since there is no potential for jail time of any length for any traffic citation-level offense. Be careful in stating the law if you are not fully informed.
You have a lot more to lose than to gain EVERY time you are pulled over, never admit guilt or answer to many questions. Instead ASK THEM questions. Ask them if you are a criminal, ask them if you are being detained, ask them to cite the statutes and laws they are going to use to justify getting your ID if they cannot answer as a PEACE KEEPING OFFICER, then you are innocent until proven guilty. This is horrible advice and I suggest doing a lot more research on the topic. My two cents ;)
@inkey2 I'm sorry, to be more clear, ask them if you are being treated as a criminal. If they say yes then ask them what crime you have committed and under which statutes OR law, very important to distinguish. If they fail to provide you with all of this information, their legal capacity goes down the tubes. Don't be rude, be cheerful and kind! :)
@Poonard When you are pulled over, this means that the officer has probable cause to believe you have commit, or are about to commit a crime, or there is objective evidence leading to the traffic stop. Not providing ID would be non-compliance. If you have nothing to hide, why would you not comply?
@dan813r: Officers do not need probable cause to pull you over. They just need reasonable suspicion of criminal activity. United States v. Brignoni-Pierce
@DavidForthoffer Oh ok I didn't know that. Do you have a degree in criminal justice? Im still working on mine. Also, do you know any websites I can find videos talking about these sorts of things?
@ilangsfs: On the other hand, officers need at least a reasonable and articulable suspicion of criminal activity before they stop you (except at an international border or a constitutional checkpoint). If they do not, it is an unconstitutional stop, and you do NOT have to identify yourself.
@ilangsfs What David said is what I feel except also that I believe that we are better of when our police officers are there to protect us from that sort of "requirment" to begin with....they MUST have damn good cause for their attempts when issuing a ticket. If not, isn't it thievery?
@Poonard The biggest LOL is that police officers (LEO's, not Peace Officers) only have authority over you in a vehicle if you are committing or have committed (or are suspected of committing) a crime. Traffic violations are CIVIL violations, and I've beaten tickets with a variety of methods..the best so far is that police officers in uniform are NOT members of the public and have no cause or authority (by me, since I'm a member of The People) to bring suit in their name. ;)
DON'T DRINK THE DAMN KOOLAID! You are a SOVEREIGN FIRST and a CITIZEN SECOND!
Study the concept of sovereignty and learn your damn rights, people! TPTB have hypnotized you into proper sheep with their codes and regulations (which mean DIDDILY SQUAT if they offend the Bill of Rights)!
Take this Cite:
"Courts are not at liberty to extend application of law to subjects not included within it" Spreckles v Graham (1924)194 C. 516, 228 P. 1040.
“All statutes and laws enacted by Congress must be in harmony with the Constitution. Any statute or law enacted by Congress that is in contradiction or disharmony with the Constitution is null and void from the beginning. It creates no duties, creates no rights, imposes no obligations or duties upon any Citizen of the united States of America. It is as if it never existed.“ Marbury v. Madison, United States Supreme Court 5 U.S. 137.
Supreme Court Justice Field, “There is no such thing as a power of inherent sovereignty in the government of the United States... In this country, sovereignty resides in the people, and Congress can not exercise power which they have not, by their Constitution, entrusted to it. All else is withheld."
Go get your damn power back and put your public employees in their place.
@rotnflesh Great comments -I agree. This guy's vid. is useful, in that it shows the "party line" we're expected to follow. We need to be extra careful deviating from it - especially when we call the cops on their civil rights violations. They REALLY hate that. You are officially labeled as a suspect/terrorist if you mention constitutional/sovereign rights. LET'S BE CAREFUL AND SMART OUT THERE! [Icky screen name, B.T.W. -I almost didn't want to reply to your comment...]
@rotnflesh plain and simple...don't give a cop any reason to fuck you up and you'll be good, that includes telling him ANYTHING about you, or giving him your license...or admitting guilt...lol it is pretty damn easy to get out of tickets.
@Poonard There are many ways to fight a ticket...the only way they succeed in extorting money out of you is when you passively/tacitly accept the rule. ; )
"We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are (endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights), that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.--That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed,"
Show me anywhere in that statement that says legal rights. All this legal rights stuff is brainwashing. Wake UP!
@11111011 The title of this video is misleading, more or less he does nothing but tell you how to behave if a policeman pulls you over. According to him yours right are only to go before a judge and no jury.
The government doesn't give you rights they only try to regulate them try and trick you into believing they can take them away as if they were a privilege.
what i think is bullshit is now that most local police are federalized, they can tack on this obstructing a government admin charge. its bullshit. more nazi america crap against our rights. most time they use it wrongfully and its thrown out. bunch of anti rights slobs. i hope they have a spouse or kid stopped and goes through it too in city near by. get a taste of the victim themselves.
i know some states are like you say. here in nm your required to get a identification id at age 15. required upon request only if officer asks for it. other then that here its silent bob.
yes, i would'nt advise women or teens for that matter, to stop for a cop on say a deserted highway.. you should probably call your husband, son, dad, brother, whatever, and tell them where you are and what happend, call the police and tell em, and try to motion to the cop to follow you into town or something, preferably a police station... obeying a damned cop isnt worth losing your life over, besides, its very dangerous to stop on a highway, even if off to the side, a truck may smash into you
\If you have a cellphone, in the U.S. -call 77- to confirm this police check is legitimate.
IOgherwise, I'd say, put your window down only an inch, and thell the officer to take you to the nearest police station, and you will be very willing to submit to a the questioning.
yeah also calling 911 and requesting a female officer is good. they get pissed if you do the inch thing but hell with them. you pay there salaries and its legal to crack it a inch to slide identification. they wanna pursue more, do the number you said, or 911 and ask for female officers. informing the cop your calling 911 will help too, most will accept and go with it, though there are rambos out there. bone heads. making up for what they lack i guess.
That 's the law, but it is very dangerous to do all this at night. Esp, for women. There are criminals working at night, especially in deserted areas- both in and out of uniform. To be stopped at night, and then have your car illuminated, and your window down..is often asking for trouble for your physical safety.
I take issue t=when he said you are obligated to cooperate. You do have to identify yourself... but from what he said you would NOT be cooperating if you refuse to give consent to search. You are NOT obligated to cooperate.
so, i listened to the whole video, but i'll ask the same thing the video asks?? what are my rights?? never mentioned them. just told me to assume the position and have my lube ready.....
If your driving a car and you are pulled over you are required to show license, registration and proof of insurance. How ever if your walking down the street and a cop stops you, you do not have to identify yourself and the officer has to tell you why he stopped you. If he's asking questions like where your going or what youll be doing later on, unless its pertinent to an active investigation you dont have to tell him anything. BE RESPECTFUL! otherwhise youll get arrested for disorderly conduct.
What kind of idiot is this guy? You have limited obligations as the driver.. You are obligated to provide a drivers license, and depending on local laws proof of insurance and registration. Beyond that you have no obligations. As a passenger you have no obligations to provide id. The officer must have a reasonable articulable suspicion that you have have/are/will commit a crime to trigger the requirement for identification..
ewhitlow 3 weeks ago
This has been flagged as spam show
We are no longer considered citizens. We are deemed enemy-combatants.
AgonyInCrisis 4 months ago
He just said what's rights you don't have and one obligation. What's The law that states you have to identify yourself? What's the courts definition of identify and yourself? What's legal definition of obligation? That was just another fluff peace. That's fine.
HDTVMan08050 5 months ago
This man did not state anything about legal rights.
DeRex9 5 months ago
why all the thumbs down? it was good advice.
fudgedogbannana 5 months ago
sycophant;
/watch?v=yqMjMPlXzdA
pCriistopher 6 months ago
BIGGEST PROBLEM OUTSIDE OF CAR - A lot of times I go running at night, cops often stop me and obviously lie saying something like "we got a few calls of someone stealing from cars, kinda described what your wearing" ... I know they are lying to get my info... In what legal way can I tell them to fuck off?
OooHesGood 7 months ago
@OooHesGood So when you're running at night, and get robbed, are you gonna tell the police to Fuck off, or call the police for help?
jsc2385 6 months ago
Comment removed
OooHesGood 6 months ago
@jsc2385 hahah listen kid, when your a man you don't need the help of anyone just because they have a shiney metal badge, it doesn't mean shit to me. I can handle myself, Ive been stabbed and shot at and I came out fine by myself. No help needed here! I'm a MAN...
OooHesGood 6 months ago
@OooHesGood ALL COPS LIE! ALL JEWS are greedy... All Hispanics are illegal immigrants, All Asians are bad drivers! All Black are Gangbangers! You tell 'em! I had no idea you are immortal! Are you proud of being shot? Badge of honor! "I've been shot and didn't die! Yes!" A real MAN admits that he's mortal..dosn't blame the WORLD's problems on them fuckin police
jsc2385 6 months ago
@jsc2385 Did I blame anything on anyone, did I say I was proud or did I use an experience as an example? I simply started by complaining about cops bothering me while I am jogging. Your the one who ASKED ME a question about what would I do if I got robbed at night, and I told you I DONT FEAR that kinda stuff... Perhaps you live in fear, I dont know but I live in "the now" and have always handled myself well in those situations. I came here for advice not to argue with you so bug off...
OooHesGood 6 months ago
@jsc2385 when you have an out of balance justice system, you gotta fight as hard as you can... to family/friends, yes your advice is most excellent
ihatesignupsgrrrrrrr 2 months ago
bullshit. this video is pure statutory bullshit. they assume you are involved in commercial activity. the Adams Family turns in their grave. This "dean" is a dupe for the feds. don't believe any of this crap.
boobellemichelle 7 months ago
it's important to remember that your lawful rights (Common Law) are more important here
ErikTekno 7 months ago
But you're not hearing what he is saying. The words coming out of his mouth I would agree on how to be stopped. But what he is not saying is that, if you're pulled over for ANY reason, without cause, this fool is basically saying "obligated". That's the same as me pulling you over and demading your ID for no reason. Would you do it? I would think..no.. You have no reason to show me as there was no cause. That's all I was pointing out. He even says " Justified or not" or probable cause or not.
larrybeme 7 months ago
@larrybeme misunderstood the video...Police don't make random stops.. they have to have lawful reason to do so..Even if the "CITIZEN" Feels the stop was unlawful, the citizen can't refuse to be detained... Whether the stop was a traffic stop or street stop... the officer(s) must have justification
jsc2385 6 months ago
This is idiot told yall to shut up do as the man said... I hope he rots in hell!
larrybeme 7 months ago
@larrybeme No sir. What this man speaks is common sense. If you have a problem with the citation or whatever else, deal with it in court. Which would you prefer, dealing with it in court or being beaten, possibly tazered (or worse) AND being arrested? I would rather keep my ego in check and deal with it later than to cop an attitude (pun intended) and be arrested. Either way, you'd end up dealing with it in court anyway. What this man speaks is simple common sense. He's absolutely right.
StevenE1972 7 months ago
This isdiot told yall to shut up do as the man said... I hope he rots in hell!
larrybeme 7 months ago
this guy is a douchebag
b2mic1 8 months ago
im not driving im traveling
Tealy855 10 months ago
Worthless.
SufferInJuly 10 months ago
"AM I FREE TO GO?"
itsjustadamnedname 10 months ago
TRAFFIC CITATIONS ARE EXTORTION... ARRESTS ARE KIDNAPPING AND OFTEN ASSAULT...COPS ARE ALLOWED TO LIE... SO KEEP YOUR MOUTH SHUT!
itsjustadamnedname 10 months ago
this guy is a schill... YOU DO NOT HAVE TO IDENTIFY YOURSELF... YOU HAVE A RIGHT TO A JURY IF THE POTENTIAL FINE IS OVER $20 ...DO NOT SAY ANYTHING...1ST AMENDMENT SAYS YOU CAN SAY WHAT YOU WANT...5TH AMENDMENT SAYS YOU DONT HAVE TO SAY ANYTHING... IF PULLED OVER ASSERT YOUR RIGHTS BY REMINDING THEM YOU ARE COOPERATING LAWFULLY BY NOT INCRIMINATING YOURSELF WITH WORDS AND REPEATEDLY ASK IF YOU ARE FREE TO GO...BY MY COUNT THAT IS TWO THINGS NOT 3... THIS GUY MAKES ME ILL...
itsjustadamnedname 10 months ago
@itsjustadamnedname ...There are no FEDERAL laws requiring you to identify yourself, but laws in some states require you to, particularly when being identified for suspicious activity. Like, say, when you're being pulled over? You also don't have the right to a lawyer or jury for misdemeanors or minor offenses, such as the majority of traffic violations. You're pulled over, they write you a ticket and send you on your way, NO BIG DEAL. Stop violating laws and you wouldn't have to deal with them.
nicoleandkent 10 months ago
@nicoleandkent and as long as the 5th amendment remains part of the constitution those laws in those states are not constitutional... You give them your name and you accept their jurisdiction... I will violate any law I don't agree with...that is called freedom... have a nice day!
itsjustadamnedname 10 months ago
@itsjustadamnedname Also, violating any law you don't feel like abiding by isn't freedom, it's criminal. Sure, if the law is unjust, by all means. Learn what it ACTUALLY unconstitutional; just because you don't like it doesn't mean it's actually wrong. With a holier than thou attitude like that, you're going to spend a lot of time in the justice system. And thank god for that, the less nutjobs like you on the street, the better off I am.
nicoleandkent 10 months ago
@nicoleandkent (Black's Law 1st Edition) FREE. 1. Unconstrained ; having power to follow the dictates of his own will. Not subject to the dominion of another. Not compelled to involuntary servitude.but, yea call me a nutjob that will make your position more credible... I am not sure what you mean by holier than thou... I am not the one with the superiority complex or displaced ego... but thanks...
itsjustadamnedname 10 months ago
@nicoleandkent (also Black's Law 1st Edition) FREEDOM. The state of being free;
liberty ; self-determination : absence of restraint; the opposite of slavery
itsjustadamnedname 10 months ago
@nicoleandkent I would post the definition for Common law also but that would take many of these tiny comment boxes... and I am sure you can go to your local university and find a copy for yourself...
itsjustadamnedname 10 months ago
you obviously are not familiar with the 6th amendment... or the meaning of the word "ALL" "In *all* criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right to a speedy and public trial, by an impartial jury of the State and district wherein the crime shall have been committed...and to have the Assistance of Counsel for his defence"
itsjustadamnedname 10 months ago
@itsjustadamnedname traffic citations are not criminal. some states do make speeding over certain amount criminal, but those are extreme cases
izaakb 10 months ago
@izaakb You are correct... they are Civil law fraud... but that didnt stop them from merging the traffic and criminal courts... that doesnt stop them from issuing a warrant and arresting you LIKE a criminal if you fail to appear/pay their bribe... Traffic citations are revenue generation vehicles for the government corporations... we pay them out of fear of arrest and that is extortion, nothing more...
itsjustadamnedname 10 months ago
@izaakb The 6th Amendment in our constitution guarantees the right to be confronted by a witness. The officer is the witness, not the ticket or notes written on the ticket. If the officer has to read from the ticket to testify, he or she is not providing information based on their recollection as a witness. Without independent recollection, the officer is not considered competent to testify against you in the eye of the law. It's then grounds for dismissal...
itsjustadamnedname 10 months ago
@izaakb "...a case may arise where there is a substantial allegation that furnishing identity at the time of a stop would have given the police a link in the chain of evidence needed to convict the individual of a separate offense. In that case, the court can then consider whether the privilege applies, and, if the Fifth Amendment has been violated, what remedy must follow. We need not resolve those questions here..." — Hiibel v. Sixth Judicial District Court of Nevada, 542 U.S. at 19
itsjustadamnedname 10 months ago
@itsjustadamnedname You can challenge any ticket you receive but that's before a judge; you only have the right to a trial before a jury for a prosecution that would warrant 6+ months of prison time. Not traffic violations, like in the video. Also, the 5th amendment protects against self incrimination and double jeopardy. Maybe you meant the 4th amendment, against unreasonable search and seizure? Note the term unreasonable. You do something wrong, you get pulled over, that's reason enough.
nicoleandkent 10 months ago
@nicoleandkent If we got a Lawyer to write some legislation that says commenting on youtube is illegal tomorrow and it got sandwiched in some bill and was passed would you follow it? what if they could put you in jail for 5 months and 27 days? that would be totally fine with you, wouldn't it? I was born into this system... I never consented to it and I never will... all humans are created equal unless you're a judge or a cop or a shill... that's wrong on MANY levels...
itsjustadamnedname 10 months ago
@itsjustadamnedname most states do in fact have a legal requirement to identify yourself when requested by an officer, plenty of courts have indicated that identifying yourself is not testimony against yourself (unless you're a fugitive from justice). Thus, no 5th amendment right involved. Otherwise, you don't have to talk or answer questions beyond providing the driver license, registration and insurance.
izaakb 10 months ago
@izaakb You CAN refuse to identify yourself based on 5th amendment, you can expect to be taken into custody, and you CAN expect to win in court... most dont want to go to jail so they comply with unconstitutional statutes... Aaron Russo made an interesting comment once about the mafia (I mean the government)... you pay them because if you dont you're going to get hurt... not necessarily because it's right...be a good slave and do what you're told... including continue to disagree with me...
itsjustadamnedname 10 months ago
He didnt say shyt other than obey
DirectcontactfaComba 10 months ago
Just another video for the bloodsucking Government! Lord Jesus Rapture us now!
arthur7770 11 months ago
COP IN A SUIT!
john17972 11 months ago 20
@john17972 < Cop in a suit, LOL, I like that!
arthur7770 11 months ago
@john17972 wierd... I thought the exact same thing before I read any comments. This guy says your obligated to identify yourself AND cooperate. I would say yes to the first part, but not to cooperating.
The best advice is to say and do as little as possible which is pretty much just identifying yourself and then remain silent.
ihatesignupsgrrrrrrr 2 months ago
spoken like a true officer of the court. i wish these guys would tell the truth for once.
tsqrd1 11 months ago
terrible advice here. i think i know the law better than this guy and i mow lawns! hahahahah
candlesnstones 1 year ago
boy i could educate this guy on rights in a court room.
skwid12 1 year ago
There's no help here.
procommenter 1 year ago
You've contributed with less than nothing to this subject. This doesn't speak very well of this Law School. This is basically telling you "bend over and put the vaseline when approached by a cop". Flex Your Rights pretty much educates you about what to do. Go check it out.
str8out 1 year ago
Well this was poor. Give a COP the license and reg. But never, ever answer any questions. And never consent to a search. Period. And never fall for that "where are you coming from, and where are you going" crap. Most likely, he is fishing. If you have done something wrong, take the ticket, and that's that. Do not be nasty, but assert your rights. They can not say that the see something, or smell something, and use that as an excuse to make a search. So keep car clean.
RCK502 1 year ago
Show me the law were im obligated to identify myself. As a matter of fact why dont you show me your LICENSE to practice law, and im not referring to your bar card.
momoturb0 1 year ago
Qui vult decipi, decipiatur. Let him who wishes to be deceived, be deceived.
A message for trolls and deniers.
rotnflesh 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
If anyone here can provide me with a legitimate source of authority to debunk my claims, I'll retract these statements; otherwise they stand as fact. Legitimate = constitutional and preceding rights to persons and property. To further establish this context, define these words: republic sovereign lawful unlawful abrogate right privilege statutory (very important..) ...and do a search for, and study, the source and order of authority in law.
rotnflesh 1 year ago
Everyone: Ignore the shill/troll badguydown19..he's the perfect example of one who paid to surf and spam. His arguments, such as they are, are without merit and are not even prima facie evidence of truth.
rotnflesh 1 year ago
NO TASERS for law enforcement. Only officers with advanced training and experience should be allowed to carry firearms. This will force law enforcement to develope their communication skills and their interactions with the public. It will stop them from working from an ego and power hungry position. They will have to work on a much different level if they do not have tasers and immediate access to firearms. They would be less bullying and it would also help their public image.
YoureAlwaysRight 1 year ago
@YoureAlwaysRight I concur, but that opens a can of worms. Being able to defend your self/family and your property entitles you to possess modern or commonly confronted/conventional weaponry...so should cops. However much I dislike it.
But, if you understand the purpose of a police officer, they are peace officers in their primary capacity, and law enforcement secondarily. As long as you state your peace and immediately open dialogue in a peaceful Sovereign capacity, they stay peace officers.
rotnflesh 1 year ago
Comment removed
YoureAlwaysRight 1 year ago
@YoureAlwaysRight I know this because I have had lengthy conversations with peace officers (sheriffs, city police, and my uncle who is a Washington state trooper)...they prefer to be peace officers and not have to resort to threat of force (which, if anyone understands, creates a problem in judicial process...unless you have already committed a crime or are in the process of committing a crime, they have no authority to threaten or use force. Period.)
rotnflesh 1 year ago
Comment removed
rotnflesh 1 year ago
@rotnflesh 2nd)I also think the taser makes an inferior officer with less peple skills and less ability to deal with situations without using force.It becomes too easy to use and officers begin to rely on the taser to get them out of a difficult situation. There are peace officers that have been in law enforcement for years and agree that guys are too quick to use the taser.These officers talk about command presence,community based policing and people skills to deal with lower level problems.
YoureAlwaysRight 1 year ago
@YoureAlwaysRight The problem with law enforcement and the use of deadly or dangerous weapons for unnecessary situations comes from the individual who commits it, not the weapons themselves...
He who seeks a reason for everything, subverts reason. 2 Co. 75.
Many police officers (not a huge portion, but enough) should not be police officers; simple as that. It's not a history of abuse, it's the propensity for abuse.
rotnflesh 1 year ago
Instead of resorting to weapons when it is almost too late, instead of giving everyone the benefit of the doubt, these specific officers immediately wield their tools of force when confronted with a complicated situation. Maybe 5% of all people who have to deal with a police officer actually do anything to justify the use of these weapons; many of them do not.
I read a story awhile back of a police officer tasing a 10 year old girl because she was "unruly and wild".
rotnflesh 1 year ago
The gist was that the parents could not get her to go to bed at bedtime, and they called the police not knowing what to do. Officer showed up, girl thrashed, officer tazed. That is not a lawful use, and just one potential example.
rotnflesh 1 year ago
@rotnflesh We had an IDIOT COP here that a few years ago, wrote a 5 year old a ticket for hitting his car. The COP was later fired, but it took 3 years and going to court. Said that he wanted to teach the kid a lesson. Where do they come up with these guys? And what is on that pscy test they take? Seem like they need to redo it.
RCK502 1 year ago
@RCK502 There was a study done that indicated the average police officer's IQ is 110. Now, I am not a strong believer in IQ testing, considering there can be and are exceptions to the rule...but when the average test concludes that police officers are not very bright, it points to a failing of legislation. Lower IQs leave little room for creative thinking; they blindly follow their codes and procedures without regard to the CONSTITUTION.
iq-test(dot)learninginfo(dot)org / iq04(dot)htm
rotnflesh 1 year ago
@rotnflesh There was a study done that indicated the average police officer's IQ is 110"
Is that the average IQ for people in America .. the average test concludes that police officers have average intelligence.
"Lower IQs leave little room for creative thinking"
-- if by creative thinking you mean police finding new ways to arrest people then that isnt a good thing.
( Sure there are plenty of creative ways to restrain someone for instance )
badpanda84 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@rotnflesh 1st) It's tough to get my entire message on here with limited font/character space allowed. I'm all for civilians protecting themselves and their families. I'm not suggesting civillians not be armed, I think more civillians should be armed and fewer peace officers. Not all officers should be armed. It should be select officers who would have this responsibility. I do think the taser should be gotten rid of entirely, it violates the 8th ammendment (cruel/unusual punishment).
YoureAlwaysRight 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@rotnflesh 1st) It's tough to get my entire message on here with limited font/character space allowed. I'm all for civilians protecting themselves and their families. I'm not suggesting civillians not be armed, I think more civillians should be armed and fewer peace officers. Not all officers should be armed. It should be select officers who would have this responsibility. I do think the taser should be gotten rid of entirely, it violates the 8th ammendment (cruel/unusual punishment).
YoureAlwaysRight 1 year ago
If I dressed up as a cop went on highway roads in a ford crown vic, and wore a uniform complete with the usual gear, I could turn on my lights and pull everybody over I chose. I could ask for ID and SSN's and threaten people's rights and property if they didn't submit to my agenda. How would the people distinguish the fraud cop, and shouldn't the people be able to ask the charge or reason they've been detained, shouldn't the cop prove he is lawfully able to conduct law.
zeppelinman07 1 year ago
@zeppelinman07 Police officers are mandated to provide their business card and badge number upon demand by a member of the public. A fraudulent cop would not have them or, upon calling his bluff, would abandon the scene.
Even so, a proper police officer would act in his peace officer capacity if his/her initial impression of you if that of a peaceful sovereign exercising rights with full respect to public peace.
rotnflesh 1 year ago
@rotnflesh which statute or rule from which state did you misconstrue to mean they have to supply you with a business card?
m221201r 11 months ago
what is this lame bunch of shit this knothead is spewing?
purpleskycalm 1 year ago
@purpleskycalm
He's telling you what you should do to keep you safe!
badguydown19 1 year ago
Under the 5th Ammendment you don't have to say anything and its better if you don't
SilentTrama 1 year ago
Is this guy a professor of tax law? I'm amazed at the amount of bad advice out there by law "professionals." Lawyers will rarely give you sound advice because they want you to become dependent on them--the same way that doctors don't want easy cures for diseases. Other than giving your basic driving information, you do not have to answer any questions, possibly incriminating yourself, ie., "being cooperative." It's called "5th Ammendment Rights." Maybe this professor should Google it? Geez!!
lizard944 1 year ago
@lizard944 You are so right! My god this professor sucks. He just gave us, as you said, basic driving info. and procedure (any county clerk could have told us what the professor told us...geez that pisses me off). The title to this vid. is our legal rights when pulled over by cop. The professor didn't tell us one right! You right, he never heard of 5th amendment! Look at this professor...doesn't he look like an ex-cop??? I bet he was a cop who later became a law professor.
susp1 1 year ago
So this has become a Nazi country to live in. What if you are parked off road and the officer is asking for I.D.'s of all adults and your children's names, birth dates, socials...etc?
fariba204me 1 year ago
@fariba204me
It all depends on what you are doing parked off the road.
badguydown19 1 year ago
Useless, uninformative video.
OneVoiceMore 1 year ago
I'd never hire this joker.
msk7046 1 year ago
Helpless video.
msk7046 1 year ago
The video is worthless.
If you are pulled over, you are required to show license, registration, and proof of insurance. Other than that, you have all other rights including the one you should always use: the right to remain silent.
You do NOT have to cooperate with the police, and no good lawyer would recommend that you do.
Rayven10 1 year ago
“...we are of the opinion that there is a clear distinction in this particular between an individual and a corporation, and that the latter has no right to refuse to submit its books and papers for an examination at the suit of the state. The individual may stand upon his constitutional rights as a citizen. He is entitled to carry on his private business in his own way. His power to contract is unlimited.
rotnflesh 1 year ago
He owes no duty to the state or to his neighbors to divulge his business, or to open his doors to an investigation, so far as it may tend to incriminate him. He owes no such duty to the state, since he receives nothing therefrom, beyond the protection of his life and property. His rights are such as existed by the law of the land long antecedent to the organization of the state, and can only be taken from him by due process of law, and in accordance with the Constitution.
rotnflesh 1 year ago
Among his rights are a refusal to incriminate himself, and the immunity of himself and his property from arrest and seizure except under a warrant of the law. He owes nothing to the public so long as he does not trespass upon their rights. Upon the other hand, the corporation is a creature of the state...” Hale v. Henkel. 201 U.S. 43 at 47 (1905).
Simple statement to cop: I have reserved all my inalienable rights without prejudice and stand on Common Law in Common Law Jurisdiction.
Game over.
rotnflesh 1 year ago
@rotnflesh
Then you would be placed under arrest for obstruction you Sovereign Citizen piece of shit! Go live in Iraq if you don't love your country!
badguydown19 1 year ago
@badguydown19 After being arrested, I would object to jurisdiction (as I have before) and prevent an arraignment from proceeding. I would never see a jail cell and, if I ever were to see a jail cell, I would bill any and all public servants for their illegal and unlawful/unwarranted detention of myself to the tune of $300/hour *about what a lawyer costs* and/or file civil charges of kidnapping and extortion. Anything signed is under threat/duress and coercion.
Learn you rights, retard.
rotnflesh 1 year ago
The billing comes from my notarized "fee schedule" and kidnapping/extorion charges under U.S.C. Title 18 §241and §242; Conspiracy to Deprive Citizens of Rights and Deprivation of Right under Color of Law.
If you're a cop, you're one of the typically uneducated ones.
rotnflesh 1 year ago
correction: criminal charges*
rotnflesh 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Whatever you sovereign citizen piece of shit!!! you don't cooperate you are going to jail!
badguydown19 1 year ago
in the court of law you always have the right to have it heard by jury unless your referring us to admiralty law sir which does not apply to a sovereign i'll take my common law please
hipsi337 1 year ago
There is a clear distinction between an automobile and a motor vehicle. An automobile has been defined as:
"The word 'automobile' connotes a pleasure vehicle designed for the transportation of persons on highways." American Mutual Liability Ins. Co. vs. Chaput, 60 A.2d 118, 120; 95 NH 200.
While the distinction is made clear between the two as the courts have stated:
"A motor vehicle or automobile for hire is a motor vehicle, other than an automobile stage, ...
Tealy855 1 year ago
@Tealy855 Also:
"The use of the automobile as a necessary adjunct to the earning of a livelihood in modern life requires us in the interest of realism to conclude that the RIGHT to use an automobile on the public highways
partakes of the nature of a liberty within the meaning of the Constitutional guarantees. . ." Berberian v. Lussier (1958) 139 A2d 869
rotnflesh 10 months ago
Title 18 USC 31:
"Motor vehicle" means every description or other contrivance propelled or drawn by mechanical power and used for commercial purposes on the highways in the transportation of passengers, or passengers and property.
"Used for commercial purposes" means the carriage of persons or property for any fare, fee, rate, charge or other considerations, or directly or indirectly in connection with any business, or other undertaking intended for profit.
Tealy855 1 year ago
OK here we go again that doesn't apply to Springfield police ,the RULE they go by is you show id or go to jail you film you go to jail you audio you go to jail you miss mandatory meeting you go to jail. so please explain that the law your talking about doesn't apply to Springfield, police have absolute power over us we have rules to go by, police did away with rights many years ago the school teaches the rules that police tell us to go by the children know only of rules and know nothing else.
maverick10241 1 year ago
this guys a liar and a half, probly a jesuit.
Airportris 1 year ago
Sounds like a lot of you who are posting negative "I don't have to comply with shit" comments are only going to create further problems for you when you do have contact with a cop. I'm all for people knowing and exercising their rights, but dammit, if you're going to go that route, know your rights. Most states do have an "obligation to identify" rule concerning traffic stops. Now I'm not saying go along with whatever the officer asks, but just flat out not complying will not help, guaranteed.
ilangsfs 1 year ago
goverment rent boy
revolutionary1982 1 year ago
this is bullshit!! give ur name and thas it!
basically give up your rights and we will take $ from u!!!
carpas9stG 1 year ago
You might as well say you are drunk as a skunk, just robbed a liquor store and you are armed and dangerous. Just throw your clients under the bus...Genius! Is there a points system in Mass. that rewards arrests and convictions to lawyers?
I should shut up that will be next. A government for the people by the people. Remember those words. They have been forgotten and are becoming more and more important. When the common man can't understand law what good is it?
JAG03064 1 year ago
This video is a complete stream of lies. Its title is intentionally misleading. Feel free to ignore this. I'm a little surprised this video hasn't gotten someone fired.
A work of incompetence.
OneVoiceMore 1 year ago
dont listen to him
rank406 1 year ago
This video is total bs. You have the right to refuse any search to have the right to remain silent. REmaining silent is ALWAYS a right reguardless if it is in coorperation with the officer. Cops are paid to help put YOU in jail. Give ur lic and regs. When asked question remind the officer all of your information is on your lic. When asked to search tell the officer i refuse consent in any situation reguardless of guilt. REmint the officer you will press charges if nothing is found.
anthonyww713 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
What are your legal rights when pulled over by the police?
Ok so what are they? You didn't say!
pentiuman 1 year ago
not me! I get out of the car, say "hey man, who the frick are you...show me your badge ... are you one of those super gay cops or just a regular gay cop?" then he'll usually say something & I'll insult him at that time....
supercrazydave 1 year ago
What are your legal rights when pulled over by the police?
Ok so what are they? You didn't say!
philais 1 year ago
remember attorneys work for the court..duhhhhh you dont have to identify yourself... wow this guy just wants you to get into the court of contracts... lol this guy is a joke.. he's dosent want you to stand up for your rights he wants you to come and pay him and the court........ i would never have an attorney
leadhorsechoctaw 1 year ago
He poses a question and doesnt answer it...or, maybe he does answer it by implying you have no rights...of course the truth is you do have rights and this guy doesnt want you to know what they are....geez, this boy is a blatant liar, or he is dumber than he looks!!!
smokiepost 1 year ago
Video is completely misleading, video sucked hardcore go suck a troopers dick faggot.
bombebomb 1 year ago
dont listen to this fool. research ur rights. u cant explain it in 2 mins
Truthseekers09 1 year ago
thanks no help what so ever.... people you have the common law right to travel. only lawfull reason to pull you over would be if they seen you or had reports you have breached the peace!!!!
Hiornz 1 year ago
I missed the most important things: Do not consent to anything, and don't talk to the police.
Taxidriver987 1 year ago
You need to learn the constitution and stop talking crap.
caindabomb 1 year ago
Police can arrest you and/or demand your ID if they "suspect" you have commited a crime. Suspician is enough for them to enforce this issue. It does not need to be a carved in stone obvious offence. They should though explain the offence you are suspected of commiting first
YouKnowIAmRight 1 year ago
Oh Excuse me?? You DO have the right to an attorney for a traffic citation: especially if you are NOT guilty of speeding. He dont know his ass from a hole in the ground.
ramboray2002 1 year ago
@ramboray2002
actually, no. You do not have a 6th amendment right to an attorney for a traffic violation. Since there is no potential for jail time of any length for any traffic citation-level offense. Be careful in stating the law if you are not fully informed.
gilbygil11 1 year ago
idiot!
addvanced 1 year ago
You have a lot more to lose than to gain EVERY time you are pulled over, never admit guilt or answer to many questions. Instead ASK THEM questions. Ask them if you are a criminal, ask them if you are being detained, ask them to cite the statutes and laws they are going to use to justify getting your ID if they cannot answer as a PEACE KEEPING OFFICER, then you are innocent until proven guilty. This is horrible advice and I suggest doing a lot more research on the topic. My two cents ;)
Poonard 1 year ago 2
@Poonard : what???? "ask "them" if "you" are a criminal? What does that mean?
inkey2 1 year ago
@inkey2 I'm sorry, to be more clear, ask them if you are being treated as a criminal. If they say yes then ask them what crime you have committed and under which statutes OR law, very important to distinguish. If they fail to provide you with all of this information, their legal capacity goes down the tubes. Don't be rude, be cheerful and kind! :)
Poonard 1 year ago
@Poonard When you are pulled over, this means that the officer has probable cause to believe you have commit, or are about to commit a crime, or there is objective evidence leading to the traffic stop. Not providing ID would be non-compliance. If you have nothing to hide, why would you not comply?
dan813r 1 year ago
@dan813r: Officers do not need probable cause to pull you over. They just need reasonable suspicion of criminal activity. United States v. Brignoni-Pierce
DavidForthoffer 1 year ago
@DavidForthoffer Oh ok I didn't know that. Do you have a degree in criminal justice? Im still working on mine. Also, do you know any websites I can find videos talking about these sorts of things?
dan813r 1 year ago
Comment removed
badpanda84 1 year ago
You have 0 obligation to provide a drivers license. This is HORRIBLE advice.
Poonard 1 year ago
@Poonard In IL, you do. You are required to have your DL on your person while driving. If you don't, it's cause for issuance of a traffic ticket.
ilangsfs 1 year ago
@ilangsfs: On the other hand, officers need at least a reasonable and articulable suspicion of criminal activity before they stop you (except at an international border or a constitutional checkpoint). If they do not, it is an unconstitutional stop, and you do NOT have to identify yourself.
DavidForthoffer 1 year ago
@DavidForthoffer what he said >:|
Poonard 1 year ago
@ilangsfs What David said is what I feel except also that I believe that we are better of when our police officers are there to protect us from that sort of "requirment" to begin with....they MUST have damn good cause for their attempts when issuing a ticket. If not, isn't it thievery?
Poonard 1 year ago 4
@Poonard The biggest LOL is that police officers (LEO's, not Peace Officers) only have authority over you in a vehicle if you are committing or have committed (or are suspected of committing) a crime. Traffic violations are CIVIL violations, and I've beaten tickets with a variety of methods..the best so far is that police officers in uniform are NOT members of the public and have no cause or authority (by me, since I'm a member of The People) to bring suit in their name. ;)
rotnflesh 10 months ago
DON'T DRINK THE DAMN KOOLAID! You are a SOVEREIGN FIRST and a CITIZEN SECOND!
Study the concept of sovereignty and learn your damn rights, people! TPTB have hypnotized you into proper sheep with their codes and regulations (which mean DIDDILY SQUAT if they offend the Bill of Rights)!
Take this Cite:
"Courts are not at liberty to extend application of law to subjects not included within it" Spreckles v Graham (1924)194 C. 516, 228 P. 1040.
And then read THIS:
rotnflesh 10 months ago
“All statutes and laws enacted by Congress must be in harmony with the Constitution. Any statute or law enacted by Congress that is in contradiction or disharmony with the Constitution is null and void from the beginning. It creates no duties, creates no rights, imposes no obligations or duties upon any Citizen of the united States of America. It is as if it never existed.“ Marbury v. Madison, United States Supreme Court 5 U.S. 137.
The older the ruling, the more common law it is.
rotnflesh 10 months ago
And, lastly for the Sovereign deniers:
Juliard v. Greeman, 110 U.S. 421 (1884)
Supreme Court Justice Field, “There is no such thing as a power of inherent sovereignty in the government of the United States... In this country, sovereignty resides in the people, and Congress can not exercise power which they have not, by their Constitution, entrusted to it. All else is withheld."
Go get your damn power back and put your public employees in their place.
rotnflesh 10 months ago
@rotnflesh Great comments -I agree. This guy's vid. is useful, in that it shows the "party line" we're expected to follow. We need to be extra careful deviating from it - especially when we call the cops on their civil rights violations. They REALLY hate that. You are officially labeled as a suspect/terrorist if you mention constitutional/sovereign rights. LET'S BE CAREFUL AND SMART OUT THERE! [Icky screen name, B.T.W. -I almost didn't want to reply to your comment...]
possums1010 8 months ago
@possums1010 SN is one i cant quite give up ;)
The Supreme Court just ruled that despite a police officer's situation, they must respect the rights of citizens.
rotnflesh 8 months ago
@rotnflesh plain and simple...don't give a cop any reason to fuck you up and you'll be good, that includes telling him ANYTHING about you, or giving him your license...or admitting guilt...lol it is pretty damn easy to get out of tickets.
Poonard 10 months ago
@Poonard There are many ways to fight a ticket...the only way they succeed in extorting money out of you is when you passively/tacitly accept the rule. ; )
rotnflesh 10 months ago
"We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are (endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights), that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.--That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed,"
Show me anywhere in that statement that says legal rights. All this legal rights stuff is brainwashing. Wake UP!
neoverse 2 years ago
@neoverse:
You aren't making a lot of sense. What is your point?
11111011 1 year ago
@11111011 The title of this video is misleading, more or less he does nothing but tell you how to behave if a policeman pulls you over. According to him yours right are only to go before a judge and no jury.
The government doesn't give you rights they only try to regulate them try and trick you into believing they can take them away as if they were a privilege.
neoverse 1 year ago
I've been pulled over for speeding 7 times.I have never got a ticket,heres how:
Shut the engine off.
Throw keys on dash.
Hands remain visible at all times.
Turn on dome light.
Dont reach into glove compartment untill they ask you to.
Be polite.
My neighbor is chief of police and my best friends brother is on SWAT team.They both gave me thoes tips and they work.
spinvilchy 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
PLZ DON'T SPAM ME...
You have just been visited by DrSuess's Cat in the Hat. He will grant
you
one wish
Make your wish when the count down is over
10,9,8,7,6,5,4,3,2,1
MAKE A WISH
Send this to 10 videos within the hour you read this.
If you do, your wish will come true
kiarrah009 2 years ago
this video sucks
thelasthallow 2 years ago
what i think is bullshit is now that most local police are federalized, they can tack on this obstructing a government admin charge. its bullshit. more nazi america crap against our rights. most time they use it wrongfully and its thrown out. bunch of anti rights slobs. i hope they have a spouse or kid stopped and goes through it too in city near by. get a taste of the victim themselves.
oterotularosa 2 years ago
actually, the police officer has an obligation to identify himself, you do not have to if there's no reasonable suspicion of having broken the law.
this video is BS and meant to scare and disarm people
grenadarian 2 years ago
@grenadarian
i know some states are like you say. here in nm your required to get a identification id at age 15. required upon request only if officer asks for it. other then that here its silent bob.
oterotularosa 2 years ago
also, that statue of justice is sexy
longfootbuddy 2 years ago
also, you should work to limit cops power over us...unless you want to live in prison under the false guise of freedom and liberty
longfootbuddy 2 years ago
yes, i would'nt advise women or teens for that matter, to stop for a cop on say a deserted highway.. you should probably call your husband, son, dad, brother, whatever, and tell them where you are and what happend, call the police and tell em, and try to motion to the cop to follow you into town or something, preferably a police station... obeying a damned cop isnt worth losing your life over, besides, its very dangerous to stop on a highway, even if off to the side, a truck may smash into you
longfootbuddy 2 years ago
excellent work!
1888junkteam 2 years ago
This guy is A lawyer for the police...he sure as hell is not representing you or me...bullshit!
PianoMusicPage 2 years ago 2
cont'd
\If you have a cellphone, in the U.S. -call 77- to confirm this police check is legitimate.
IOgherwise, I'd say, put your window down only an inch, and thell the officer to take you to the nearest police station, and you will be very willing to submit to a the questioning.
EarthaKit2 2 years ago
@EarthaKit2
yeah also calling 911 and requesting a female officer is good. they get pissed if you do the inch thing but hell with them. you pay there salaries and its legal to crack it a inch to slide identification. they wanna pursue more, do the number you said, or 911 and ask for female officers. informing the cop your calling 911 will help too, most will accept and go with it, though there are rambos out there. bone heads. making up for what they lack i guess.
oterotularosa 2 years ago
He says: "Day or Night.."
That 's the law, but it is very dangerous to do all this at night. Esp, for women. There are criminals working at night, especially in deserted areas- both in and out of uniform. To be stopped at night, and then have your car illuminated, and your window down..is often asking for trouble for your physical safety.
cont'd
EarthaKit2 2 years ago
I take issue t=when he said you are obligated to cooperate. You do have to identify yourself... but from what he said you would NOT be cooperating if you refuse to give consent to search. You are NOT obligated to cooperate.
DrCheckRaise 2 years ago
so, i listened to the whole video, but i'll ask the same thing the video asks?? what are my rights?? never mentioned them. just told me to assume the position and have my lube ready.....
scourgefe1nd 2 years ago
Heh. Rights. We don't have rights. They don't exist.
What we have are PRIVILEGES, Privileges that can be taken from us at any time.
The Government has shown that to us on numerous occasions...
Rights? Yeah right...
screech519 2 years ago 2
Amen
mikejackson4ever 2 years ago
You're a George Carlin fan aren't you?
scorpionkings 2 years ago
we are not obligated to have or show I.D but the police are
YouRaDickTed 2 years ago
ohhhh comply yes nazi where is my papers...
TextEffect 2 years ago
how unhelpful
mnmn59 2 years ago
If your driving a car and you are pulled over you are required to show license, registration and proof of insurance. How ever if your walking down the street and a cop stops you, you do not have to identify yourself and the officer has to tell you why he stopped you. If he's asking questions like where your going or what youll be doing later on, unless its pertinent to an active investigation you dont have to tell him anything. BE RESPECTFUL! otherwhise youll get arrested for disorderly conduct.
AmericanPoliceState 2 years ago 13