There was no manned moon landings ever! And why? Because NASA is run by freemasons and tares (human-angelic hybrids) who lie and make you believe things that are not true. Radiation alone would have killed them. It was hoaxes that they pulled off. Illuminati run things and control the media, politics, music and movie industry, etc. They can pull it off!
An interesting video, though I do think O' Leary has a point when he says there is bigger things in the world to be worried about rather than whether the Moon Landing was a hoax or not.
This film is such fake bullshit that it's pitiful. Explain how the ASCENT POD was able to blast off the moon & catch up to the CM doing 4000 MPH.-simply ridiculous. Here is a NASA PHOTO of the scotchtaped cardboarded LEM on the "moon" aulis dot com/jackstudies_4.html
No way in the world was this POD able to launch off the moon & catch the CM doing 4000 MPH. Science? Or SCIENCE FICTION? LOL I choose the latter.
@cadu1995 Yeah, I saw the picture. Why not get a hold of one of the Grumman engineers who designed and built the LEM to operate purely in the vacuum of space - never to be subjected to ANY wind resistance or atmospheric drag. They can answer your questions - Jarrah White can not.
So it might have looked rickety-in fact Grumman techs were paid bonuses for every pound they could safely shed.
As for ascent & rendezvous-just because you can't wrap your head around it, doesn't mean it didn't happen.
Of 5:55: Wow, that is NOT a contradiction, it is consistent. O'Leary keeps saying he doesn't know 100% -- after all, he didn't go to the moon himself -- but he believes the claims of astronauts who say they went. The narrator is engaged in dishonest parsing, plain enough.
Hassle? There is NO hassle in the mainstream scientific community. O'Leary has stated that he was misleadingly edited so as to appear to seriously question the moon landing. But if you were to watch the whole video he clearly thinks the landing occurred and has since stated so in no uncertain terms.
I have a question. att 60´s the Russian would have barbecued US if they found out baout this. they could watch all the US movments carefully and they had the tecnology, radars to follow the mision. they had good agence inside US. plus, why no one ever doubted about Russians luna or what it name was, they send to the suface of the monn. was that face too? I don´t blieve it. the conspiracy theory is a foolish theoriy.
Hey Jarrah - are you watching CATALYST tonight? With all those eminent scientists talking about the things they have learnt from studying the MOON rocks? How different they are? How they aren't found on Earth?
Yeah, as I though. No balls, no actual proof, just piss & wind. You just make your little videos Jarrah. There will always be someone who'll believe you...
"I have no idea if would talk to an expert or not ... Why don't you ask him? "
EXCELLENT IDEA, STRAYDOG!
Well Jarrah - will you? Have you got the balls to verify your claims to an expert, or are you going to find a reason to weasel out of it? I'll turn up and even give you an interview!
Have you got the balls, or are you just piss and wind?
Get a clue, Robby the Robot .. You've bought into the US government cold war bluff and publicity stunt of the century, otherwise known as Project Apollo.
Robby the Robot.. If you look up the definition of internet troll, you will find your picture there.. If you look up duped sheep, you will find it there also.
"Really? care to provide evidence of that statement? Or are you perhaps distorting the truth... again."
The one distorting the truth here is you, as usual .. I just sent you a PM about you accusing me of being somebody I'm not... Not everything can be googled, including my real identity.. So as soon as you apologize to me for accusing me of being someone I'm not, and for doing things I didn't do, I will send you the links you want.
"Talking about distortion; first you sign off wiht Straydog02 and now you use Dipshit. Funny name for a straw btw."
As usual Robby the Robot has it all wrong... My name is stray, not straw and I didn't sign off as dipshit... I called "m8081679" a dipshit cuz that's what he called me in his nasty PM to me, accusing me of being someone I'm not..
Please try to get your facts straight Robby .. It's bad enough that you have Apollo all wrong.. so at least try to get the simple stuff right, ok?
And of course you deny your identity. You don't want people to know who you really are - but you can't deny the evidence. It's there for all to see. I'm not going to apologise for telling the truth about you. It's just another example in your history of lies.
"It's just another example in your history of lies."
Sez the Apollogist whose "heros" and mentors are all pathological liars... Again, priceless!
Unless you have some proof that I'm some young punk who beat up his GF and got busted for drugs, I suggest you stop making a complete fool of yourself, "m8081679".
"When O'Leary wrote to Jarrah that NASA has ALSO hoaxed other missions, he did admit it."
Can't wait to see the back-pedaling on this one. You lied - plain and simple."
Obviously you didn't watch Jarrah's video which included Dr. O'leary's e-mail reply to him .. O' Leary clearly stated that NASA has ALSO hoaxed other things ... As in; other missions besides Apollo.
See? I just knew you'd lie. He didn't say OTHER MISSIONS. He said OTHER THINGS.
You've just assumed it was other missions because of your blind hatred. So once again you have posted lies about what he said.
It's the same difference between him say 'I believe Apollo was real but cannot be 100% sure' to mean 'the landings were faked'. I'm surprised you people can lie straight in bed!
I'm not wrong about what O'Leary said, so why are you pretending that I am?
"No wonder you won't admit your past!"
It's not my past, you stupid fool ... I can't admit to something I didn't do or to being someone I'm not .. I can't believe what an idiot you are ...No, on second thought, I can.
"That "public grilling" wouldn't involve some of the foolish Apollogist clowns on apollohoaxdotnet by any chance, would it? "
No - it would involve Jarrah having to defend his radiation claims against an Australian expert, face to face. Probably someone from UNSW, perhaps Uni of Sydney, perhaps ANSTO! They'd be experts in radiation.
"I have no idea if would talk to an expert or not ... Why don't you ask him? "
EXCELLENT IDEA, STRAYDOG!
Well Jarrah - will you? Have you got the balls to verify your claims to an expert, or are you going to find a reason to weasel out of it? I'll turn up and even give you an interview!
Have you got the balls, or are you just piss and wind?
"Hi stray what radio stations is un4 giving interviews to? love to hear them"
Hey monkey ... I missed the live show because my old PC was fried by a virus when it aired.. pt1gard recorded the program though and sent me the links to it .. If you send me your e-mail address in a PM I will be happy to forward the links onto you.
"No, Conspiracy Radio. The station so paranoid that they won't tell anyone the frequency!"
If you would like to hear the radio program explaining why Apollo was a hoax, I will be happy to send you the links also, "m8081679" ... Just send me your e-mail addy in a PM.. That is unless you're too afraid for a CT to know what it is.
btw, I understand that you're not the sharpest knife in the Apollogist's drawer, but my user name is very simple to spell.. It's stray with a "y" at the end, not a "w"... Please try to spell it right next time and thank you in advance, Robby the Apollogist Troll Clown!
I see that Robby the Troll Clown thinks he's a comedian...Too bad the only one laughing is the other clueless Apollogist Troll Clown, m8081679. also known as Jay Windley.
I have found a Quantec Image Processing Co. in Brunswick Business Park in Liverpool and a Quantec Image Processing Co. in Leigh, both UK. I will try them.
Mister White, why are there no videos with Neil Armstrong, Edwin Aldrin, Charles Conrad, Alan Bean, Alan Shepard, Edgar Mitchell, David Scott, James Irwin, John Young, Charles Duke, Gene Cernan or Harrison Schmitt telling that the Apollo missions were faked?
Why are there no videos with a serious number of scientists doubting the missions?
"why are there no videos with Neil Armstrong, Edwin Aldrin, Charles Conrad, Alan Bean, Alan Shepard, Edgar Mitchell, David Scott, James Irwin, John Young, Charles Duke, Gene Cernan or Harrison Schmitt telling that the Apollo missions were faked?"
Becasue they are paid by NASA to STFU about the Apollo Hoax.
"Why are there no videos with a serious number of scientists doubting the missions?"
Because they are threatened by NASA to STFU about the Apollo Hoax.
Gemini 5 probably. Despite spending a lot of time in the sun, that mission became increasingly cold after a damaged fuel-cell forced the crew to switch off the air conditioner.
So the missions after Gemini 5 were all faked? That makes an even more unlikely conspiracy. Totally impossible to arrange. Do you have any idea Jarrah how many engineers were involved in the Gemini project? So Grissom, Young, McDivitt, White, Stafford, Schirra, Borman, Lovell, Scott, Armstrong, Stafford, Cernan, Collins, Conrad, Gordon, Cooper and a 'few' others are liars, too?
Not all the Gemini flights were hoaxes. I'm convinced that 3, 4, 8 and 9 made orbit. I'm not sure how much of the Gemini program was real, but there were some definite hoaxes within that project.
WHAT? DID NASA CONVINCE YOU? Or something else? Please tell us Jarrah, how did they do it? Are you absolutely sure? And why are you convinced, why are you sure? We want PROOF!
You have still to comment on the fact that a former Apollo astronaut has stated much of what NASA does is faked.
And also you have yet to answer my initial question - and still to be addressed without your typically devious slime of deflection - ... do you consider yourself to be a better judge of NASA's missions than BO'L?
Robby here is the new CEO of the corporation called Trolls R Us .. Let's all give Robby a very warm welcome as he spews his silly troll disinformation all over Jarrah's chanel.
Jarrah , I admire your patience in dealing with clowns like Robby the troll, who refuses to see that Apollo was nothing more than One Giant Leg Pull For All Mankind.
"It's nothing Strayshit compared to the patience we have with your 'friend' Humanmonkeyrace."
Monkey doesn't like liars, like you.
But why so hostile Robby the troll? .. I hope you didn't think that I was insulting you by saying that you could be the CEO of Trolls R Us... It could be much worse, ya know .. You could be like some of the pathetically insane maggots who defend the Apollo scam, by working for Psychos R Us, along with your pals svector, SpreadingTheMuse and MRphotogod.
David Groves has a PhD and Bill Wood has a BSc, both doubt Apollo. And in the beginning James Van Allen declared the Van Allen belts were an lethal barrier to astronauts.
And in 1935, many renown scientists said that nuclear fission was impossible. In March 1945, Admiral William D Leahy, Chief of Staff to President Roosevelt said: "The atomic bomb will never go off, and I speak as an expert in explosives."
As knowledge improves, we can do things previously thought impossible.
James Van Allen specifically REFUTED that he had any doubts about Apollo.
So how many radiation experts have you got to specifically agree with you, say specifically that Apollo was faked?
You can bring them, and all the astronauts and rocket engineers who also clearly state that Apollo was faked, and really show us Apollo Nutters up, eh?
Boy, I'll really have to eat my words when all those radiation experts proclaim that Apollo was faked!
"You just can't help it, can you? That explains why you beat up your girlfriend though - or was it the drugs they found you had?"
Proving once again that Google is NOT your best friend, "m8081679"... Sorry to burst your delusional bubble, but I'm not the Duane who did either one of those awful things.. Nor am I the Duane who manages an Applebees resturant.
It appears that you're clueless about more than just Apollo.
O'Leary said much, much more. About the video and pictures taken, the telemetry, the equipment used. About the Command Module, Service Module, Lunar Module and LRV. About the scientific experiments left on the surface and the data received from them. Aboutt the moonrocks and 6 foot long intact core tube samples brought back. About satellites launched from the SIM bays into lunar orbit and the laser-reflectors left at the landingsites.
Hmmm. I think you'll find O'Leary flat right out and said that NASA fake and hoax everything and he's not sure if the dudes who are supposed to have walked on the moon actually did despite them being his friends and colleaugues.
Brian O'Leary was asked for an interview about Mars. Eventhough he mentioned that he thought the moonmissions were real, the interviewers used only a few other quotes out of context to suggest that O'Leary had serious doubts. He doesn't consider that interview to be a fair depiction of his beliefs. He says. But every organization has its little scratch ofcourse. Like JW Studios has you.
Perhaps your inability to provide any qualified person to make a statement such as "Apollo was faked" is because no-one actually qualified to make such a statement because they BELIEVE - like Dr O'Leary - that the landings were real?
You still haven't found anyone? Surely with all these "smoking guns" and "clear evidence" you would have found at least one qualified professional to state "Apollo was faked!".
Seems all you (and you internet goon squad) can do is accuse other people of lying and use foul language towards them.
Still waiting for the astronaut who says "the moon landings were faked". Still waiting for the radiation specialist who says "the moon landings were faked". Still waiting for the geologist who says "the lunar samples are faked". Still waiting for the rocket designer who says "the moon rockets are faked".
No, I am not. Despite many requests, you have failed to provide any person qualified in astronautical engineering, space sciences, radiation, lunar geology, etc, who actually states "Apollo was faked". All you have done is refer to a previous video of yours where Dr O'Leary says that it is REMOTELY possible some scenes where faked because film was spoilt, and that although HE BELIEVES THE LANDINGS WERE REAL, he cannot be 100% sure. That's because he wasn't on the Moon himself.
Still waiting for the astronaut who says "the moon landings were faked". Still waiting for the radiation specialist who says "the moon landings were faked". Still waiting for the geologist who says "the lunar samples are faked". Still waiting for the rocket designer who says "the moon rockets are faked".
Can you actually produce anyone who actually says that?
*sigh* It seems we are dealing with a propagandist/Apollogist who acts exactly like Jay Windley, aka; svector ... Your Jekyll and Hyde routine always was good for a laugh.
"And you seem unable to do anything but call people names."
But Jay, you called me and the rest of my CT friends on U-T "sycophants" first.. So I was just returning the favor.
Hey, I thought you said that you would only post on a moderated forum, among "polite company" ( like the insulting vultures on apollohoaxdotnet could be called polite.. LOL ) .. I guess you must have changed your mind.
Oh! So anyone trained to the appropriate degree in space sciences who DISAGREES with your opinion - the opinion of someone who is NOT trained in space sciences - is wrong?
You are welcome to try, and I would strongly suggest you post their replies here. What country / state / city are you in? Most have an observatory. Whilst you are at it, why not also talk to a university / college department?
I'd like to speak to the bad astronomer but he barred me for pointing out the antics of Jack Schmitt with his visor up pre-recorded footage because conspiracy theorists had already noticed the visor down antics of the actor-nots in the tv studios.
I'm not Jay, and I don't know what he (Dr O'Leary) is referring too, so I can't answer. I can say this, though: Has NASA been dishonest? Yes - the original Shuttle launch schedule is an example. Has NASA been reckless? Yes - the CHALLENGER disaster is an example of poor management. Did NASA fake the Moon landings? No - everything points towards that it was not a hoax.
"I guess that's the best your meager intellect can create, so go right ahead."
If that's suppossed to be an insult, then you need to take some lessons from some of the Apollogist psychos who defend the Apollo Fraud, by REALLY insulting the CT's... LOL
" Oh! So anyone trained to the appropriate degree in space sciences who DISAGREES with your opinion - ...... - is wrong? "
Very LindastevensBS / swindley style there m808' :-)
Of course you miss the point with your tiresome "find an expert who agrees with the hoax proposition" dirge ...you're assuming they're also stupid enough to wreck their careers and their big fat official line paychecks by speaking the equivalent of modern heresy that man made global warming is a profitable fantasy.
So because you cannot find anyone means that everyone is scared away or lying? Hardly solid logic there, fella. What about Richard Feynman, who constantly criticized NASA? Yet despite this, he did not claim the landings were faked. Perhaps the reason you cannot find anyone is because none of those people believe the landings were faked.
You don't actually know that to be the case. Rather, none are prepared to come out in public and state reservations, except a brave few. My response was crystal clear, yet you attempt to re-fudge the issue.
You admit NASA have a record of dishonesty . An ex-Apollo team astronaut says much of what they do is hoaxed.
And the head of a NASA-affiliated moon hoax "debunking" site is caught lying more than once.
Yet you still uphold the bright star of your beloved Apollo like a Grim fairy tale.
Where are these brave few? Dr O'Leary says - again - he believes they landed. He doesn't count. Where are the others? You must be able to find someone.
I didn't say NASA had a record of dishonesty; I said they had been dishonest and gave an example. That is not a "record" IMO. If you consider it so, then if you have ever been dishonest then you have a record of dishonesty.
Mr Windley has NOT been caught lying; rather he has been able to substantiate everything he has claimed.
" Mr Windley has NOT been caught lying; rather he has been able to substantiate everything he has claimed. " And there's a lie within a lie from Mr Windley.
No, but keep trying. Only 6 billion more people to try - who knows, you might get it right in the first million you try! And after being called sycophant, liar, a liar, etc, I feel I'm entitled to call Jarrah's attack dogs a name or two.
How does he pay you, BTW? Cash? Free video production?
Yet another delusion. I'm surprised no-one knows who I am; it's not like I have gone to a lot of trouble to hide it! Just really shows how stupid you are!
Yeah, but you're wrong. Does that penetrate through your thick head yet? I'm being totally honest with who I am, and you are totally wrong - but your ego won't let you accept the fact you might have got something wrong. You're a drongo!
I don't regard a question to my initial question as being a response... Its called deflection, weasel.
Now. For the second time what do you make of a former Apollo astronaut's comment that much of what NASA does is hoaxed?
And if you disagree, why do you consider that you, of all people, should know better than him?
Answer the question or put your pointy D cap on, stand in the corner of class and bother us no more with your terminally tedious and self-righteous haranguing.
Still waiting for the astronaut who says "the moon landings were faked". Still waiting for the radiation specialist who says "the moon landings were faked". Still waiting for the geologist who says "the lunar samples are faked". Still waiting for the rocket designer who says "the moon rockets are faked". Still waiting for just one shred of credible evidence instead of personal attacks from Mr White's internet goon squad.
"He can't disagree with any official US government position even when he knows it's false because he works for the US government. "
Right you are Cosmo.. You would think that NASA would cut this little runt loose, now that he's been exposed as being a pathological liar... If he and that other liar, Phil Plait, are all NASA has to defend their bogus Apollo Program, I feel sorry for them.
Windley is going to go down in history as an infamous propagandist. His family members are going to have to have their names changed. He's going to be as well-known as Joseph Goebbels. They must be paying him a lot considering what he's sacrificing.
Still waiting for the astronaut(s) who claim that Apollo was faked, because so far you have NONE - including Dr O'Leary, who was the focus of your video. Pretty pictures and modern music do not evidence make.
"How many times do you have to be shown he said that he believe they landed on the Moon?"
READ HIS WHOLE QUOTE. He believes they went to the moon, BUT IS NOT 100% SURE.
There's a big difference between believing something happened and knowing definitely sure that it did, and not being 100% sure over what you believe in.
"How many times do you have to be shown he said that he believe they landed on the Moon? You shouldn't try and change the meaning of his words."
I remember reading that Dr. O'Leary thought the Apollo astronots gave some rather strange answers to some of his questions to them, of what it was like to walk on the Moon.. and that was the main reason he wasn't 100% sure that they landed.
"So where are the other astronauts that say it (the landing) was faked? Are there any? "
I already answered that silly deflection question .. but maybe you missed it, so here it is again.. "Unfortunately, none of them are allowed to say that Apollo was faked, for obvious reasons.. but of course as one of NASA's hard working shills, you already knew that."
So are you really Windley, or just one of his many sycophants?
" Still waiting for the astronaut(s) who claim that Apollo was faked,.."
Classic deflection tactics. The issue is actually one of trust.
Jay Windley wants people to believe his alleged quotes purely on the basis of say-so alone and without any back-up evidence whatsoever.
For someone so keen on demanding the application of rigorous logic and proof to "evidence" its a pretty poor show ...and must now cast serious doubt over the authenticity of his entire body of work at Clavius
"Pretty pictures and modern music do not evidence make."
Neither does a load of condescending BS and meaningless, redundant, deflective questions.
Speaking of evidence, where is the proof that Dr. O'Leary e-mailed Windley ?.. Not Jay's recent, desperate contact with him, covering his obvious lies, but the alleged original e-mail, which is the discussion of this video.
If I remember correctly, Dr. OLeary's reply to Jarrah, when asked if he had been in contact with Windley, was "NOPE".
"No a/not, or Apollo/NASA official, has ever volunteered to take a lie detector test to prove their story.
And none have ever been cross-examined under oath, or even questioned by trained investigators."
Nor will they.. That's not the way it works in the USA, where evil things like g w bush, dick cheney, karl rove, donald rumsfeld, etc. are allowed to commit crimes of high treason, including destroying the Constitution and the Geneva Convention, and are allowed to get away with it.
No I don't. There is a big difference between believing something happened and knowing for a fact that it did, and believing something happened but not being absolutely certain.
"Whether or not Mr Windley has an e-mail is irrelevant"
It is entirely relevant when Windley claims O'Leary told him the exact opposite to what he told me. O'Leary told me he IS NOT 100% sure, Windley claims O'Leary IS 100%.
So what you are saying is that although Dr O'Leary says - on more than one occasion - he believes the landings happened, you are using him to try and promote exactly the opposite view?
So, where are all the astronauts who say the landings were faked?
O'Leary told me that although he thinks they landed he is not 100% sure, that's a big difference to saying that it definitely happened. Saying that it definitely happened is the equivalent to saying that you are 100% sure it happened.
Why is what O'Leary told me completely contradictory to what he supposedly told Jay Windley?
There was no manned moon landings ever! And why? Because NASA is run by freemasons and tares (human-angelic hybrids) who lie and make you believe things that are not true. Radiation alone would have killed them. It was hoaxes that they pulled off. Illuminati run things and control the media, politics, music and movie industry, etc. They can pull it off!
jpsmart59 1 month ago
More hoax videos for gullible children.
Dumbing' down the world for what???... a few bucks? Geeeeezzzz ...No scruples man..
Tweekerhead 7 months ago
Thumbs up for one more person who didn't sell their soul (O'Leary)
howitzer24 10 months ago
An interesting video, though I do think O' Leary has a point when he says there is bigger things in the world to be worried about rather than whether the Moon Landing was a hoax or not.
mikefromireland 1 year ago
Oleary appears to be COINTELPRO
All O'leary is doing is giving NASA an escape route suggesting that "some" of the footage might have been faked.
I would suggest it is more likely he has been told by NASA to say this - to give them more room to move.
IMO if he was really spilling beans he would have been killed a long time ago.
I think the apollo missions were fake but I also don't think there's such a thing as a high level ex NASA employee. - certainly not a "Maverick" one.
spacehopperballs 1 year ago
This film is such fake bullshit that it's pitiful. Explain how the ASCENT POD was able to blast off the moon & catch up to the CM doing 4000 MPH.-simply ridiculous. Here is a NASA PHOTO of the scotchtaped cardboarded LEM on the "moon" aulis dot com/jackstudies_4.html
No way in the world was this POD able to launch off the moon & catch the CM doing 4000 MPH. Science? Or SCIENCE FICTION? LOL I choose the latter.
cadu1995 1 year ago
@cadu1995 Yeah, I saw the picture. Why not get a hold of one of the Grumman engineers who designed and built the LEM to operate purely in the vacuum of space - never to be subjected to ANY wind resistance or atmospheric drag. They can answer your questions - Jarrah White can not.
So it might have looked rickety-in fact Grumman techs were paid bonuses for every pound they could safely shed.
As for ascent & rendezvous-just because you can't wrap your head around it, doesn't mean it didn't happen.
hibob418 9 months ago
Of 5:55: Wow, that is NOT a contradiction, it is consistent. O'Leary keeps saying he doesn't know 100% -- after all, he didn't go to the moon himself -- but he believes the claims of astronauts who say they went. The narrator is engaged in dishonest parsing, plain enough.
terrythecensor 1 year ago
the only witness who can tell us the truth is god and ufo or alien
standfield30 2 years ago
The best proof about the Apollo fake is...
all this hassle 40 years after moon landing!
think about it!
MicaelaAlmodovar 2 years ago
Hassle? There is NO hassle in the mainstream scientific community. O'Leary has stated that he was misleadingly edited so as to appear to seriously question the moon landing. But if you were to watch the whole video he clearly thinks the landing occurred and has since stated so in no uncertain terms.
greatsea 2 years ago
I have a question. att 60´s the Russian would have barbecued US if they found out baout this. they could watch all the US movments carefully and they had the tecnology, radars to follow the mision. they had good agence inside US. plus, why no one ever doubted about Russians luna or what it name was, they send to the suface of the monn. was that face too? I don´t blieve it. the conspiracy theory is a foolish theoriy.
melcordy 2 years ago
Hey Jarrah - are you watching CATALYST tonight? With all those eminent scientists talking about the things they have learnt from studying the MOON rocks? How different they are? How they aren't found on Earth?
Don't you feel like a total knobber?
m8081679 2 years ago
Maybe you can enlighten us on what they've learnt? Are these the same scientists who say there is LITTLE water in moon rocks as opposed to NO water?
Which scientists have taken arguments put forward by those deny moon landings and taken them apart one by one? I'll tell you...NONE.
Are you a scientist? We can argue on SCIENTIFIC grounds here if you want.
Are you man enough or do you like others just resort to insults? ( Sign of zero intelligence by the way)
TheArif01 2 years ago
Please people.. point me to a highly educated scientist who believe the moon walk was fake.
GalOnHunt 2 years ago
YAY! Quote Mining!, oh please, try better.
alexkidd3d 2 years ago
Yeah, as I though. No balls, no actual proof, just piss & wind. You just make your little videos Jarrah. There will always be someone who'll believe you...
m8081679 2 years ago
"I have no idea if would talk to an expert or not ... Why don't you ask him? "
EXCELLENT IDEA, STRAYDOG!
Well Jarrah - will you? Have you got the balls to verify your claims to an expert, or are you going to find a reason to weasel out of it? I'll turn up and even give you an interview!
Have you got the balls, or are you just piss and wind?
m8081679 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
"See? I just knew you'd lie. He didn't say OTHER MISSIONS. He said OTHER THINGS."
I can't remember if he said things or missions but it doesn't matter since the OPERATIVE WORDS WERE NASA ALSO HOAXED.
"So once again you have posted lies about what he said. "
Only a delusional freak like you would pretend to not know the difference between a non diirect quote and a lie.
"I'm surprised you people can lie straight in bed! "
I'm surprised dishonst creeps like you can even sleep.
straydog02 2 years ago
Gotcha Straw.
Rob260259 2 years ago
"Gotcha Straw. "
Get a clue, Robby the Robot .. You've bought into the US government cold war bluff and publicity stunt of the century, otherwise known as Project Apollo.
straydog02 2 years ago
"Gotcha Straw. "
Yes, that's what I said.
Rob260259 2 years ago
"Gotcha Straw."
Robby the Robot.. If you look up the definition of internet troll, you will find your picture there.. If you look up duped sheep, you will find it there also.
straydog02 2 years ago
Gotcha again!
Rob260259 2 years ago
"Why is Brian O'Leary too afraid to admit the truth that nasa faked it???"
When O'Leary wrote to Jarrah that NASA has ALSO hoaxed other missions, he did admit it.
straydog02 2 years ago
Really? care to provide evidence of that statement? Or are you perhaps distorting the truth... again.
m8081679 2 years ago
"Really? care to provide evidence of that statement? Or are you perhaps distorting the truth... again."
The one distorting the truth here is you, as usual .. I just sent you a PM about you accusing me of being somebody I'm not... Not everything can be googled, including my real identity.. So as soon as you apologize to me for accusing me of being someone I'm not, and for doing things I didn't do, I will send you the links you want.
Dipshit.
straydog02 2 years ago
Talking about distortion; first you sign off wiht Straydog02 and now you use Dipshit. Funny name for a straw btw.
Rob260259 2 years ago
"Talking about distortion; first you sign off wiht Straydog02 and now you use Dipshit. Funny name for a straw btw."
As usual Robby the Robot has it all wrong... My name is stray, not straw and I didn't sign off as dipshit... I called "m8081679" a dipshit cuz that's what he called me in his nasty PM to me, accusing me of being someone I'm not..
Please try to get your facts straight Robby .. It's bad enough that you have Apollo all wrong.. so at least try to get the simple stuff right, ok?
straydog02 2 years ago
I see you avoided the question. Typical.
And of course you deny your identity. You don't want people to know who you really are - but you can't deny the evidence. It's there for all to see. I'm not going to apologise for telling the truth about you. It's just another example in your history of lies.
m8081679 2 years ago
"I see you avoided the question. Typical."
I didn't avoid any question, dipshit.. You accused me of being someone I'm not and I expalined to you why you're wrong.
"You don't want people to know who you really are -"
Sez the misguided, delusional fool who calls himself m8081679 ... Priceless!
"It's there for all to see. I'm not going to apologise for telling the truth about you."
You wouldn't know the truth if it jumped up a bit you on your unenlightened arse.
straydog02 2 years ago
"It's just another example in your history of lies."
Sez the Apollogist whose "heros" and mentors are all pathological liars... Again, priceless!
Unless you have some proof that I'm some young punk who beat up his GF and got busted for drugs, I suggest you stop making a complete fool of yourself, "m8081679".
straydog02 2 years ago
And you STILL haven't answered the question: where is the evidence of that statement? This one:
"When O'Leary wrote to Jarrah that NASA has ALSO hoaxed other missions, he did admit it."
Can't wait to see the back-pedaling on this one. You lied - plain and simple.
m8081679 2 years ago
"When O'Leary wrote to Jarrah that NASA has ALSO hoaxed other missions, he did admit it."
Can't wait to see the back-pedaling on this one. You lied - plain and simple."
Obviously you didn't watch Jarrah's video which included Dr. O'leary's e-mail reply to him .. O' Leary clearly stated that NASA has ALSO hoaxed other things ... As in; other missions besides Apollo.
straydog02 2 years ago
See? I just knew you'd lie. He didn't say OTHER MISSIONS. He said OTHER THINGS.
You've just assumed it was other missions because of your blind hatred. So once again you have posted lies about what he said.
It's the same difference between him say 'I believe Apollo was real but cannot be 100% sure' to mean 'the landings were faked'. I'm surprised you people can lie straight in bed!
No wonder you refuse to admit you're wrong.
No wonder you won't admit your past!
m8081679 2 years ago
Comment removed
straydog02 2 years ago
"No wonder you refuse to admit you're wrong."
I'm not wrong about what O'Leary said, so why are you pretending that I am?
"No wonder you won't admit your past!"
It's not my past, you stupid fool ... I can't admit to something I didn't do or to being someone I'm not .. I can't believe what an idiot you are ...No, on second thought, I can.
straydog02 2 years ago
So... you can't admit you're wrong.
You can't admit you lied.
You can't produce any astronaut, aerospace engineer, radiation expert, etc, who says Apollo was hoaxed.
Jarrah won't face a public grilling on his radiation claims by an actual radiation expert.
What you DO do is pump each others egos, and tell yourselves how good you all are.
m8081679 2 years ago
"So... you can't admit you're wrong."
What part of O'Leary admitted that NASA ALSO hoaxed other things do you not understasnd?
"You can't admit you lied."
It's pretty difficult to admit something I didn't do.
"Jarrah won't face a public grilling on his radiation claims by an actual radiation expert."
That "public grilling" wouldn't involve some of the foolish Apollogist clowns on apollohoaxdotnet by any chance, would it?
straydog02 2 years ago
"What you DO do is pump each others egos, and tell yourselves how good you all are. "
Thanks for describing what you and your Apollogist pals do best ! ..You just projected your own stupid pack behavior onto your perceived enemies.
Again, priceless!
straydog02 2 years ago
"That "public grilling" wouldn't involve some of the foolish Apollogist clowns on apollohoaxdotnet by any chance, would it? "
No - it would involve Jarrah having to defend his radiation claims against an Australian expert, face to face. Probably someone from UNSW, perhaps Uni of Sydney, perhaps ANSTO! They'd be experts in radiation.
But he won't do it, will he?
m8081679 2 years ago
"But he won't do it, will he? "
I have no idea if would talk to an expert or not ... Why don't you ask him?
straydog02 2 years ago
"I have no idea if would talk to an expert or not ... Why don't you ask him? "
EXCELLENT IDEA, STRAYDOG!
Well Jarrah - will you? Have you got the balls to verify your claims to an expert, or are you going to find a reason to weasel out of it? I'll turn up and even give you an interview!
Have you got the balls, or are you just piss and wind?
m8081679 2 years ago
"Hi stray what radio stations is un4 giving interviews to? love to hear them"
Hey monkey ... I missed the live show because my old PC was fried by a virus when it aired.. pt1gard recorded the program though and sent me the links to it .. If you send me your e-mail address in a PM I will be happy to forward the links onto you.
straydog02 2 years ago
"Un4g is busy giving radio interviews "
LOL
On radio Banana, 104 FM?
Rob260259 2 years ago
No, Conspiracy Radio. The station so paranoid that they won't tell anyone the frequency!
m8081679 2 years ago
LOL
And a big thumb up.......!
Rob260259 2 years ago
"LOL
And a big thumb up.......! "
I bet Robby the Troll Clown has a very big thumb!
straydog02 2 years ago
I bet Robby the Troll Clown has a very big thumb!
Which he uses to pull Vector Windleys organ stops when he entertains US sailors with sea shanties
greenmagoos 2 years ago
"No, Conspiracy Radio. The station so paranoid that they won't tell anyone the frequency!"
If you would like to hear the radio program explaining why Apollo was a hoax, I will be happy to send you the links also, "m8081679" ... Just send me your e-mail addy in a PM.. That is unless you're too afraid for a CT to know what it is.
LOL
straydog02 2 years ago
Hey Straw, you can send it to me as well, no problem. robenlineke @ gmail [dot] com
Rob260259 2 years ago
"Hey Straw, you can send it to me as well, no problem"
Robby the Apollogist Troll Clown spelled my name wrong as a joke .. He's such a "original" comedian !!
The radio program explaining why Apollo was One Giant Leg Pull For All Mankind will be on it's way to you tomorrow.
straydog02 2 years ago
Thank you in advance Straw!
Rob260259 2 years ago
"Thank you in advance Straw! "
You're welcome.
btw, I understand that you're not the sharpest knife in the Apollogist's drawer, but my user name is very simple to spell.. It's stray with a "y" at the end, not a "w"... Please try to spell it right next time and thank you in advance, Robby the Apollogist Troll Clown!
straydog02 2 years ago
Oh dear. I'm sorry Straw, it will not happen again.
Rob260259 2 years ago
"LOL
On radio Banana, 104 FM?"
I see that Robby the Troll Clown thinks he's a comedian...Too bad the only one laughing is the other clueless Apollogist Troll Clown, m8081679. also known as Jay Windley.
straydog02 2 years ago
Is Dr.Groves employed at 'QUANTEC'..?
I have found a Quantec Image Processing Co. in Brunswick Business Park in Liverpool and a Quantec Image Processing Co. in Leigh, both UK. I will try them.
For your information Jarrah.
Rob260259 2 years ago
"Is Dr.Groves employed at 'QUANTEC'..?"
Yes.
WhiteJarrah 2 years ago
Right. I contacted Quantec Ltd in the UK. Mister Groves is employed there. Uh.....obviously he owns the place! So I'm anxious to read his answer(s).
Rob260259 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Mister White, why are there no videos with Neil Armstrong, Edwin Aldrin, Charles Conrad, Alan Bean, Alan Shepard, Edgar Mitchell, David Scott, James Irwin, John Young, Charles Duke, Gene Cernan or Harrison Schmitt telling that the Apollo missions were faked?
Why are there no videos with a serious number of scientists doubting the missions?
Rob260259 2 years ago
"why are there no videos with Neil Armstrong, Edwin Aldrin, Charles Conrad, Alan Bean, Alan Shepard, Edgar Mitchell, David Scott, James Irwin, John Young, Charles Duke, Gene Cernan or Harrison Schmitt telling that the Apollo missions were faked?"
Becasue they are paid by NASA to STFU about the Apollo Hoax.
"Why are there no videos with a serious number of scientists doubting the missions?"
Because they are threatened by NASA to STFU about the Apollo Hoax.
straydog02 2 years ago
"Becasue they are paid by NASA to STFU about the Apollo Hoax."
Sure.
"Because they are threatened by NASA to STFU about the Apollo Hoax"
Ofcourse.
Rob260259 2 years ago
Comment removed
Rob260259 2 years ago
MichaelStmark, Greenmagoos, Straydog2. The entire conspiracists cavalry is on alert. Where is Un4glvsick?
Rob260259 2 years ago
"MichaelStmark, Greenmagoos, Straydog2. The entire conspiracists cavalry is on alert. Where is Un4glvsick?"
Un4g is busy giving radio interviews exposing the Apollo fraud, instead of swapping insults on U-T with lying Apollogists like you.
I'll be sure to tell him that Robby the troll was asking about him.
straydog02 2 years ago
Well, that's really convincing then Jarrah. Yes, the Apollo program must be a hoax.
By the way; when did NASA start faking?
Rob260259 2 years ago
"By the way; when did NASA start faking?"
Gemini 5 probably. Despite spending a lot of time in the sun, that mission became increasingly cold after a damaged fuel-cell forced the crew to switch off the air conditioner.
WhiteJarrah 2 years ago
Comment removed
Rob260259 2 years ago
So the missions after Gemini 5 were all faked? That makes an even more unlikely conspiracy. Totally impossible to arrange. Do you have any idea Jarrah how many engineers were involved in the Gemini project? So Grissom, Young, McDivitt, White, Stafford, Schirra, Borman, Lovell, Scott, Armstrong, Stafford, Cernan, Collins, Conrad, Gordon, Cooper and a 'few' others are liars, too?
Rob260259 2 years ago
"So the missions after Gemini 5 were all faked?"
Not all the Gemini flights were hoaxes. I'm convinced that 3, 4, 8 and 9 made orbit. I'm not sure how much of the Gemini program was real, but there were some definite hoaxes within that project.
watch ? v = lSyxD7B2Siw
WhiteJarrah 2 years ago
WHAT? DID NASA CONVINCE YOU? Or something else? Please tell us Jarrah, how did they do it? Are you absolutely sure? And why are you convinced, why are you sure? We want PROOF!
Rob260259 2 years ago
@Rob260259
From the initiation of the federal reserve bank in 1913, all happenings in the past century, including the two world wars have been organized.
We will not speak about the hollow HOAX, or 9/11 Hoax
NO wene all want to go to VENUS
Nice warm planet
And the women are HOT over there
So letS gO
Luiwerwimmes 1 year ago
Rob.
You have still to comment on the fact that a former Apollo astronaut has stated much of what NASA does is faked.
And also you have yet to answer my initial question - and still to be addressed without your typically devious slime of deflection - ... do you consider yourself to be a better judge of NASA's missions than BO'L?
Yes or no.
michaelstmark 2 years ago
Why do I have to?
Rob260259 2 years ago
"Why do I have to? "
Robby here is the new CEO of the corporation called Trolls R Us .. Let's all give Robby a very warm welcome as he spews his silly troll disinformation all over Jarrah's chanel.
Jarrah , I admire your patience in dealing with clowns like Robby the troll, who refuses to see that Apollo was nothing more than One Giant Leg Pull For All Mankind.
straydog02 2 years ago
"Jarrah , I admire your patience in dealing with clowns"
It's nothing Strayshit compared to the patience we have with your 'friend' Humanmonkeyrace.
Rob260259 2 years ago
"It's nothing Strayshit compared to the patience we have with your 'friend' Humanmonkeyrace."
Monkey doesn't like liars, like you.
But why so hostile Robby the troll? .. I hope you didn't think that I was insulting you by saying that you could be the CEO of Trolls R Us... It could be much worse, ya know .. You could be like some of the pathetically insane maggots who defend the Apollo scam, by working for Psychos R Us, along with your pals svector, SpreadingTheMuse and MRphotogod.
straydog02 2 years ago
So the (interpretation of-) the words of mister O'Leary is your straw, to state that "the moonlandings were fake" ?
What about other scientists doubting NASA and acknowledging your truly exceptional footages? Where are they?
Your sympathizer Greenmagoos talks about "NASA fake and hoax everything"
Another interpreation I guess?
Rob260259 2 years ago
"What about other scientists doubting NASA"
David Groves has a PhD and Bill Wood has a BSc, both doubt Apollo. And in the beginning James Van Allen declared the Van Allen belts were an lethal barrier to astronauts.
WhiteJarrah 2 years ago
David Groves worked in the United Kingdom. Do you know where I can contact him?
Rob260259 2 years ago
And in 1935, many renown scientists said that nuclear fission was impossible. In March 1945, Admiral William D Leahy, Chief of Staff to President Roosevelt said: "The atomic bomb will never go off, and I speak as an expert in explosives."
As knowledge improves, we can do things previously thought impossible.
James Van Allen specifically REFUTED that he had any doubts about Apollo.
m8081679 2 years ago
"As knowledge improves, we can do things previously thought impossible."
How does a Geiger counter make a mistake?
WhiteJarrah 2 years ago
So how many radiation experts have you got to specifically agree with you, say specifically that Apollo was faked?
You can bring them, and all the astronauts and rocket engineers who also clearly state that Apollo was faked, and really show us Apollo Nutters up, eh?
Boy, I'll really have to eat my words when all those radiation experts proclaim that Apollo was faked!
m8081679 2 years ago
Still no answer on my question: how many (real) scientists subscribe the idea of the NASA fakery?
Rob260259 2 years ago
"Boy, I'll really have to eat my words when all those radiation experts proclaim that Apollo was faked!"
Instead of eating your words, you should eat shit and die... Then there would be one less game playing asshole in the world.
straydog02 2 years ago
You just can't help it, can you? That explains why you beat up your girlfriend though - or was it the drugs they found you had?
m8081679 2 years ago
"You just can't help it, can you? That explains why you beat up your girlfriend though - or was it the drugs they found you had?"
Proving once again that Google is NOT your best friend, "m8081679"... Sorry to burst your delusional bubble, but I'm not the Duane who did either one of those awful things.. Nor am I the Duane who manages an Applebees resturant.
It appears that you're clueless about more than just Apollo.
straydog02 2 years ago
"How does a Geiger counter make a mistake? "
LOL
straydog02 2 years ago
That is exactly what O'Leary was referring to; a few quotes out of context to suggest that he had serious doubts.
Rob260259 2 years ago
"That is exactly what O'Leary was referring to; a few quotes out of context to suggest that he had serious doubts. "
You are aware that he told me point-blank "I think they did land, but am not 100% sure" and "much of what NASA does is also hoaxed"
WhiteJarrah 2 years ago
Yes, I am aware of that.
So...?
Rob260259 2 years ago
"Yes, I am aware of that.
So...?"
Do you need me to draw you a picture?
WhiteJarrah 2 years ago
Yes please. Or make another video.
Rob260259 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
M808, take a look at this:
/watch?v=nKxjHjgQ26U&feature=channel_page
It explains enough.
Rob260259 2 years ago
O'Leary said much, much more. About the video and pictures taken, the telemetry, the equipment used. About the Command Module, Service Module, Lunar Module and LRV. About the scientific experiments left on the surface and the data received from them. Aboutt the moonrocks and 6 foot long intact core tube samples brought back. About satellites launched from the SIM bays into lunar orbit and the laser-reflectors left at the landingsites.
That it was faked? No, he did not say that.
Rob260259 2 years ago
'That it was faked? No, he did not say that. '
Hmmm. I think you'll find O'Leary flat right out and said that NASA fake and hoax everything and he's not sure if the dudes who are supposed to have walked on the moon actually did despite them being his friends and colleaugues.
greenmagoos 2 years ago
Brian O'Leary was asked for an interview about Mars. Eventhough he mentioned that he thought the moonmissions were real, the interviewers used only a few other quotes out of context to suggest that O'Leary had serious doubts. He doesn't consider that interview to be a fair depiction of his beliefs. He says. But every organization has its little scratch ofcourse. Like JW Studios has you.
Rob260259 2 years ago
If you're gonna quote shit from Windley's site, maybe you should learn what kind of guy Jay Windley is.
See here: watch?v=pnsVo_hFxO0
WhiteJarrah 2 years ago
Wow. Now that I've seen your video my view on him has completely changed.
Not.
Rob260259 2 years ago
One (1) star production. That's all.
Obviously I touched an open nerve, reading your quick response. Sorry for that.
Rob260259 2 years ago
"One (1) star production. That's all.
Obviously I touched an open nerve, reading your quick response. Sorry for that."
Do you have anything constructive to say? Or do you just plan on pissing around the place like a troll?
WhiteJarrah 2 years ago
"Do you have anything constructive to say? Or do you just plan on pissing around the place like a troll? "
Oh - rather than pissing around like your sycophants, the internet goon squad of straydog, stmark, etc?
How egalitarian of you!
m8081679 2 years ago
Comment removed
Rob260259 2 years ago
"Or do you just plan on pissing around the place like a troll? "
What else can one do in a public toilet?
Rob260259 2 years ago
Perhaps your inability to provide any qualified person to make a statement such as "Apollo was faked" is because no-one actually qualified to make such a statement because they BELIEVE - like Dr O'Leary - that the landings were real?
m8081679 2 years ago
You still haven't found anyone? Surely with all these "smoking guns" and "clear evidence" you would have found at least one qualified professional to state "Apollo was faked!".
Seems all you (and you internet goon squad) can do is accuse other people of lying and use foul language towards them.
Pretty standard for your ilk, I would say.
m8081679 2 years ago
Totally agree M.
Where are all the scientists that doubt the moonlandings of Apollo?
Why is it that only a few YouTube-detectives, conspiracy-theorists and political distrusters believe in this ridiculous hoax?
Rob260259 2 years ago
Still waiting for the astronaut who says "the moon landings were faked". Still waiting for the radiation specialist who says "the moon landings were faked". Still waiting for the geologist who says "the lunar samples are faked". Still waiting for the rocket designer who says "the moon rockets are faked".
m8081679 2 years ago
"Still waiting for the astronaut who says "the moon landings were faked"."
watch ? v = pnsVo_hFxO0
Happy now?
WhiteJarrah 2 years ago
No, I am not. Despite many requests, you have failed to provide any person qualified in astronautical engineering, space sciences, radiation, lunar geology, etc, who actually states "Apollo was faked". All you have done is refer to a previous video of yours where Dr O'Leary says that it is REMOTELY possible some scenes where faked because film was spoilt, and that although HE BELIEVES THE LANDINGS WERE REAL, he cannot be 100% sure. That's because he wasn't on the Moon himself.
m8081679 2 years ago
"All you have done is refer to a previous video"
Actually, I sent you a link in which O'Leary says "MUCH OF WHAT NASA DOES IS ALSO HOAXED"
WhiteJarrah 2 years ago
*sigh* It seems I am dealing with a child.
Still waiting for the astronaut who says "the moon landings were faked". Still waiting for the radiation specialist who says "the moon landings were faked". Still waiting for the geologist who says "the lunar samples are faked". Still waiting for the rocket designer who says "the moon rockets are faked".
Can you actually produce anyone who actually says that?
m8081679 2 years ago
"*sigh* It seems I am dealing with a child."
*sigh* It seems we are dealing with a propagandist/Apollogist who acts exactly like Jay Windley, aka; svector ... Your Jekyll and Hyde routine always was good for a laugh.
straydog02 2 years ago
And you seem unable to do anything but call people names.
m8081679 2 years ago
"And you seem unable to do anything but call people names."
But Jay, you called me and the rest of my CT friends on U-T "sycophants" first.. So I was just returning the favor.
Hey, I thought you said that you would only post on a moderated forum, among "polite company" ( like the insulting vultures on apollohoaxdotnet could be called polite.. LOL ) .. I guess you must have changed your mind.
straydog02 2 years ago
Still waiting for any scientist to be anywhere near honest about the moon you mean don't you?
greenmagoos 2 years ago
Oh! So anyone trained to the appropriate degree in space sciences who DISAGREES with your opinion - the opinion of someone who is NOT trained in space sciences - is wrong?
Why do I question the logic of your statements?
m8081679 2 years ago
I'd love to go to an obsevatory armed with old photos and negatives of the moon plus documents.
Actually the bad astronomer would do nicely for some choice questions.
greenmagoos 2 years ago
You are welcome to try, and I would strongly suggest you post their replies here. What country / state / city are you in? Most have an observatory. Whilst you are at it, why not also talk to a university / college department?
m8081679 2 years ago
Who would you recommend ?
I presume they have an e-mail address.
I'd like to speak to the bad astronomer but he barred me for pointing out the antics of Jack Schmitt with his visor up pre-recorded footage because conspiracy theorists had already noticed the visor down antics of the actor-nots in the tv studios.
greenmagoos 2 years ago
Oh and just as a matter of interest Jay, what's your take on Brian OL's statement that much of what NASA does is hoaxed?
Just curious...
michaelstmark 2 years ago
I'm not Jay, and I don't know what he (Dr O'Leary) is referring too, so I can't answer. I can say this, though: Has NASA been dishonest? Yes - the original Shuttle launch schedule is an example. Has NASA been reckless? Yes - the CHALLENGER disaster is an example of poor management. Did NASA fake the Moon landings? No - everything points towards that it was not a hoax.
m8081679 2 years ago
So m8081679, are you really Jay Windley/Utah, or just one of his many sycophants?
straydog02 2 years ago
I am neither Mr Windley nor a sycophant.
m8081679 2 years ago
"I am neither Mr Windley nor a sycophant."
If you insist... How about I just call you an Apollogist, propagandist parrot then?
straydog02 2 years ago
I guess that's the best your meager intellect can create, so go right ahead.
m8081679 2 years ago
"I guess that's the best your meager intellect can create, so go right ahead."
If that's suppossed to be an insult, then you need to take some lessons from some of the Apollogist psychos who defend the Apollo Fraud, by REALLY insulting the CT's... LOL
straydog02 2 years ago
" Oh! So anyone trained to the appropriate degree in space sciences who DISAGREES with your opinion - ...... - is wrong? "
Very LindastevensBS / swindley style there m808' :-)
Of course you miss the point with your tiresome "find an expert who agrees with the hoax proposition" dirge ...you're assuming they're also stupid enough to wreck their careers and their big fat official line paychecks by speaking the equivalent of modern heresy that man made global warming is a profitable fantasy.
michaelstmark 2 years ago
So because you cannot find anyone means that everyone is scared away or lying? Hardly solid logic there, fella. What about Richard Feynman, who constantly criticized NASA? Yet despite this, he did not claim the landings were faked. Perhaps the reason you cannot find anyone is because none of those people believe the landings were faked.
m8081679 2 years ago
You don't actually know that to be the case. Rather, none are prepared to come out in public and state reservations, except a brave few. My response was crystal clear, yet you attempt to re-fudge the issue.
You admit NASA have a record of dishonesty . An ex-Apollo team astronaut says much of what they do is hoaxed.
And the head of a NASA-affiliated moon hoax "debunking" site is caught lying more than once.
Yet you still uphold the bright star of your beloved Apollo like a Grim fairy tale.
michaelstmark 2 years ago
Where are these brave few? Dr O'Leary says - again - he believes they landed. He doesn't count. Where are the others? You must be able to find someone.
I didn't say NASA had a record of dishonesty; I said they had been dishonest and gave an example. That is not a "record" IMO. If you consider it so, then if you have ever been dishonest then you have a record of dishonesty.
Mr Windley has NOT been caught lying; rather he has been able to substantiate everything he has claimed.
m8081679 2 years ago
"Mr Windley has NOT been caught lying; rather he has been able to substantiate everything he has claimed."
Either you've never watched any of Jarrah's vidoes listing your, er I mean Windley's MANY lies, or you live by that river in Egypt.
straydog02 2 years ago
" Mr Windley has NOT been caught lying; rather he has been able to substantiate everything he has claimed. " And there's a lie within a lie from Mr Windley.
" I'm not Jay"... and yet another.
The sheer nerve of desperation.
michaelstmark 2 years ago
You really are that stupid, aren't you? You think I'm Jay Windley? Well, I'm on the wrong continent for a start. Then I am also not an American.
Yes, you really are that stupid. In my country, you'd be known as an oxygen bandit, a WOFTAM. And you are wrong about Apollo as well, you idiot.
m8081679 2 years ago 2
See how easy you slip back into svector hate mode too.
Old habits die hard, heh.
michaelstmark 2 years ago
No, but keep trying. Only 6 billion more people to try - who knows, you might get it right in the first million you try! And after being called sycophant, liar, a liar, etc, I feel I'm entitled to call Jarrah's attack dogs a name or two.
How does he pay you, BTW? Cash? Free video production?
m8081679 2 years ago 2
Nailing you as svector is wealth enough for me!
( And methinks thou protesteth too much......Jay. )
michaelstmark 2 years ago
Yet another delusion. I'm surprised no-one knows who I am; it's not like I have gone to a lot of trouble to hide it! Just really shows how stupid you are!
m8081679 2 years ago 2
" I'm surprised no-one knows who I am; it's not like I have gone to a lot of trouble to hide it! "
My point exactly.
michaelstmark 2 years ago
"My point exactly. "
Yeah, but you're wrong. Does that penetrate through your thick head yet? I'm being totally honest with who I am, and you are totally wrong - but your ego won't let you accept the fact you might have got something wrong. You're a drongo!
m8081679 2 years ago 2
" I'm being totally honest with who I am "
I know, you're a lying piece of 'roo poo.....honestly.
michaelstmark 2 years ago
Hey Mikey, thought that you called me a svector...? Or are we (M8081679 and I) that guy you met in your nightmare?
Rob260259 2 years ago
Glad you finally found the video I assigned to you as your homework Rob. Gold star, boy.
Took you a while to find it but hey, theres no looking back for you now!
So come on, tell us what you think about NASA "hoaxing much of what they do".
And if you disagree, how come you imagine you know better than BO'L.
ps I never even insinuated you're svector, you haven't got half the guile of that stinking little neo-Nazi cyber skunk troll.
michaelstmark 2 years ago
Can you answer this question Mikey;
Where are all the scientists that doubt the moonlandings of Apollo?
Rob260259 2 years ago
I don't regard a question to my initial question as being a response... Its called deflection, weasel.
Now. For the second time what do you make of a former Apollo astronaut's comment that much of what NASA does is hoaxed?
And if you disagree, why do you consider that you, of all people, should know better than him?
Answer the question or put your pointy D cap on, stand in the corner of class and bother us no more with your terminally tedious and self-righteous haranguing.
michaelstmark 2 years ago
"Mr Windley has NOT been caught lying; rather he has been able to substantiate everything he has claimed."
like how moon rock contains "no water"
aaaaahahahahahhahahahahahhahaaaaaaaa
HA
adiohead 2 years ago
Still waiting for the astronaut who says "the moon landings were faked". Still waiting for the radiation specialist who says "the moon landings were faked". Still waiting for the geologist who says "the lunar samples are faked". Still waiting for the rocket designer who says "the moon rockets are faked". Still waiting for just one shred of credible evidence instead of personal attacks from Mr White's internet goon squad.
m8081679 2 years ago
The press is controlled so if anyone were to come forward, we'd never hear about it. Do a "YouTube" search on "Chomsky media".
It would also be downright dangerous for someone to come forward.
/watch?v=ZfYBJFPuiwE
"Thomas Baron and astronauts killed to keep Apollo program" (YouTube)
s1 (dot) zetaboards (dot) com/LooseChangeForums/single/?p=79239&t=51606
(check link for gaps)
Cosmored 2 years ago
To see one of Jay Windley's lies, click on the first four hotlinks in this post from a moon hoax thread below.
s1 (dot) zetaboards (dot) com/LooseChangeForums/single/?p=54200&t=51606
(check link for gaps)
Cosmored 2 years ago
Look at the way Jay Windley ducked this question asked of him. (reply #3)
apollohoax (dot) proboards21 (dot) com/index.cgi?board=othertheories&action=display&thread=1584
(check link for gaps)
He can't disagree with any official US government position even when he knows it's false because he works for the US government.
Cosmored 2 years ago
"He can't disagree with any official US government position even when he knows it's false because he works for the US government. "
Right you are Cosmo.. You would think that NASA would cut this little runt loose, now that he's been exposed as being a pathological liar... If he and that other liar, Phil Plait, are all NASA has to defend their bogus Apollo Program, I feel sorry for them.
straydog02 2 years ago
Windley is going to go down in history as an infamous propagandist. His family members are going to have to have their names changed. He's going to be as well-known as Joseph Goebbels. They must be paying him a lot considering what he's sacrificing.
Cosmored 2 years ago
still no proof from windley ;)
m8081679 must be him because his comments make me feel physically sick :)
adiohead 2 years ago
Still waiting for the astronaut(s) who claim that Apollo was faked, because so far you have NONE - including Dr O'Leary, who was the focus of your video. Pretty pictures and modern music do not evidence make.
m8081679 2 years ago
How many times do I have to say this? He stated that he is not 100% sure and that it was possible that NASA might have faked it.
WhiteJarrah 2 years ago
How many times do you have to be shown he said that he believe they landed on the Moon? You shouldn't try and change the meaning of his words.
So where are the other astronauts that say it (the landing) was faked? Are there any? Or is the video just a personal attack on Mr Windley?
m8081679 2 years ago
"How many times do you have to be shown he said that he believe they landed on the Moon?"
READ HIS WHOLE QUOTE. He believes they went to the moon, BUT IS NOT 100% SURE.
There's a big difference between believing something happened and knowing definitely sure that it did, and not being 100% sure over what you believe in.
WhiteJarrah 2 years ago
"How many times do you have to be shown he said that he believe they landed on the Moon? You shouldn't try and change the meaning of his words."
I remember reading that Dr. O'Leary thought the Apollo astronots gave some rather strange answers to some of his questions to them, of what it was like to walk on the Moon.. and that was the main reason he wasn't 100% sure that they landed.
straydog02 2 years ago
"So where are the other astronauts that say it (the landing) was faked? Are there any? "
I already answered that silly deflection question .. but maybe you missed it, so here it is again.. "Unfortunately, none of them are allowed to say that Apollo was faked, for obvious reasons.. but of course as one of NASA's hard working shills, you already knew that."
So are you really Windley, or just one of his many sycophants?
straydog02 2 years ago
" Still waiting for the astronaut(s) who claim that Apollo was faked,.."
Classic deflection tactics. The issue is actually one of trust.
Jay Windley wants people to believe his alleged quotes purely on the basis of say-so alone and without any back-up evidence whatsoever.
For someone so keen on demanding the application of rigorous logic and proof to "evidence" its a pretty poor show ...and must now cast serious doubt over the authenticity of his entire body of work at Clavius
michaelstmark 2 years ago
"Pretty pictures and modern music do not evidence make."
Neither does a load of condescending BS and meaningless, redundant, deflective questions.
Speaking of evidence, where is the proof that Dr. O'Leary e-mailed Windley ?.. Not Jay's recent, desperate contact with him, covering his obvious lies, but the alleged original e-mail, which is the discussion of this video.
If I remember correctly, Dr. OLeary's reply to Jarrah, when asked if he had been in contact with Windley, was "NOPE".
straydog02 2 years ago
A prima facie case of Apollo Fraud has been made. It now needs to be properly investigated - that is the normal procedure in criminal inquiries.
If NASA is innocent, then it has nothing to fear from an investigation and should welcome the chance to clear itself from suspicion.
No a/not, or Apollo/NASA official, has ever volunteered to take a lie detector test to prove their story.
And none have ever been cross-examined under oath, or even questioned by trained investigators.
sergemck 2 years ago
"No a/not, or Apollo/NASA official, has ever volunteered to take a lie detector test to prove their story.
And none have ever been cross-examined under oath, or even questioned by trained investigators."
Nor will they.. That's not the way it works in the USA, where evil things like g w bush, dick cheney, karl rove, donald rumsfeld, etc. are allowed to commit crimes of high treason, including destroying the Constitution and the Geneva Convention, and are allowed to get away with it.
straydog02 2 years ago
"You avoid the facts"
No I don't. There is a big difference between believing something happened and knowing for a fact that it did, and believing something happened but not being absolutely certain.
"Whether or not Mr Windley has an e-mail is irrelevant"
It is entirely relevant when Windley claims O'Leary told him the exact opposite to what he told me. O'Leary told me he IS NOT 100% sure, Windley claims O'Leary IS 100%.
You can't have it both ways.
WhiteJarrah 3 years ago
So where are all the astronauts that say it didn't happen?
m8081679 3 years ago
So what you are saying is that although Dr O'Leary says - on more than one occasion - he believes the landings happened, you are using him to try and promote exactly the opposite view?
So, where are all the astronauts who say the landings were faked?
m8081679 3 years ago
O'Leary told me that although he thinks they landed he is not 100% sure, that's a big difference to saying that it definitely happened. Saying that it definitely happened is the equivalent to saying that you are 100% sure it happened.
Why is what O'Leary told me completely contradictory to what he supposedly told Jay Windley?
WhiteJarrah 3 years ago