Nice interview, seems he still finds it hard to talk about Freddie even now :( and for the record, I would have gone to see Queen + any f**king body that Brian & Roger care to bring on tour with them just for the chance to see and hear them live. Going under any name other than Queen would have been dumb & pointless! But that's just me :)
Queen without Freddie and John is not "Queen" for me anymore , nevertheless how good Paul is as a singer - Freddie is irreplacable nad unique he was. I went to the gig of them in 2005 and during the gig I couldn't stop thinking of Freddie and how it would be to see him again since 1986 when I had the honor to see him in concert...But that is my POV dunno what other true fans think...
I'm sorry but there's something so wrong about Paul Rogers singing Queen songs. He simply does not have the vocal range or stage presence. Sounds like terrible car wreck between Queen and Free. He's got that whole macho Bad Company persona and sound which doesn't suit Queen's material. The leather pants, shoddy hair piece and hairy chest are over the top for a geezer like Paul. I wish them the best of luck with their own material, though....
To go out under a different name wouldn't have been "dumb", it would of been decent. Queen without Mercury is like Wings without Paul McCartney. Freddie was the essence of Queen.
Based on what Freddie says, we can maybe say that although it seems like Freddie does all the work or is the main person or whatever you want to say, he isn't. Brian, Roger, John and Freddie each do 25% of the work/contribution but yes it is true that Freddie is the most flamboyant on stage and a great entertainer and frontman.
To natacha45 and lots of other people: this comment is objective and factual.
Freddie Mercury has said before that all of them do like 25% of the work.
There is an interview where the lady doesn't understand and keeps asking him if he is the main person of Queen (I think). He tries to explain but she keeps asking so eventually he says yes. You can tell he doesn't mean it but just says it.
i must admit i was totally suprised-i went seeing queen with paul rodgers live thinking i wouldnt be that into it. i knew they werent going to play my favorite songs (from the early albums) but wow. as soon as they started playing it was incredible! it was good to hear it all turned up! ive heard paul rodgers at the expo '92 with brian may and that was pretty good aswell.
all people knows, but Paul is so talented!! and Freddie could be so proud of him, we all know that Freddie is the king, no matter what, and Paul just sings his songs good, but not like Freddie, they are very different :)
NO QUEEN WITHOUT FREDDIE! Brian and Roger are still very good, but they should change the name of the band if they want to go on with making music. No-one can replace incomparable man of genius called Freddie Mercury. Paul Rogers shouldn't sing the songs sung by Freddie and walk with the microphone like Freddie did. It's just ridiculous for someone who says that he doesn't want to copy Freddie. Let him sing his own songs instead of running off with Freddie's legacy.
You do know that Brian came first then he found Roger then Fredie followed them around until they decided to add him. Then they found John. I mean I LOVE FREDDIE!!!! but they do it FOR Freddie, and trust me I am no big fan of paul's. Queen has to live on. Freddie said they be togther unitll they effen all die.
It's just my opinion. You don't have to agree with me. I do know how this band was born. The name Queen was Freddie's idea. I am sure that without Freddie, although he joined the band later than Brian and Roger, this band would never be what it was. No-one would deny that. completely different and prob
It surely wouldn't be that popular without Freddie just because Freddie was the one who could make this band legendary. Brian, Roger and John were certainly very good, but there is a big difference between being very good and being legendary. John didn't want to go on with Queen although I don't know whether it was because Freddie wasn't there anymore. I would believe it was the reason, but I am not sure.
You don't have to agree with me either. And I do not like Paul Rogers!!! I miss Freddie singing the songs!!! But I don't except Brian and Roger to crawl into a hole!!
You mean you don't accept Brian and Roger to crawl into a hole. Neither do I! I've never said that. Both of them are really great musicians. Just read my message once more. Wouldn't it be ridiculous if the Beatles would go on with the same name without John and George? You just can't be the same band with the same name. That's what I mean. It's great, that a lot of people can go to a concert and can enjoy the mucis of Queen, but I don't accept the name Queen without Freddie.
but u have to accept the fact, briam, roger and john are still "the queen" even if our freddie is gone...i think it should be ridiculous if they change their name...
Should I change my point of view because not everybody agrees with me?By the way, John is not a part of "the Queen" anymore. Should he also change up his mind? Brian, Roger and John are brilliant musicians, but it would be silly to deny that mainly Freddie made this band legendary. Just read the comments of the "Queen" fans here on YouTube. Most of them are about Freddie while he was only a part of the group. Doesn't it say enough?
yes it's true, freddie was the soul of the band, but have u ever been in a "Queen more Paul Rogers" live? they always talk about freddie and with a big screen on their back shows their past and friendship...very exciting!!! paul rogers don't dares to sing bohemiam rhapsody!!!
Any idea why John Deacon didn't want to go on with "Queen"? I find Paul Rogers an offend for the band, and I am not the only one. But you don't have to agree with me. Freddie was the soul of the group. I am glad that Brian and Roger enjoy going on with making music and are satisfied with Paul Rogers, but for me it's not the old "Queen" anymore. Just call it "QueenII" or whatever.
I saw the Queen/Paul Rogers tour last year in Washington, DC. It was absolutly fabulous. IT WAS FABULOUS!!! the sound was sharp. the playing was great and Paul- show me another big name that old that can still sing as crisp and powerfuly as him?? show me. there is none. He was awe-inspiring truly. In interviews he sounds like the nicest guy you could me and he is appreciative of what he has and of life.
I saw the Queen/Paul Rogers tour. And Paul Rogers did not to channel Freddie. He did an amazing job with the songs and I completely enjoyed it. Freddie would be pleased to know that their music was still being enjoyed live.
John walking away has nothing 2 do with any of this. John chose 2 av nothing 2 do with Queen + PR.....coz he is retired, John retired from the music biz, soon after Freddie passed away, the last thing John ever did with Queen, was in 1997 (Rememeber, No-one But You (Only The Good Die Young). John no longer wants 2 b assosiated with the music biz, he prefers 2 b at home with his wife and childen and family.
omg!! i didn't realize how old he is now..awww. i was just watching some video when roger was sooo young. but roger looks a whole lot older than brian i think, even though he's actually younger. haha..and he's gained a bit of weight.
I always figured Roger would be cute as an old man...I was so right.
ilovebelladonna 3 months ago
Have you noticed he gets a lil upset talking about Freddie. Even now :(
prescott2811 10 months ago
Nice interview, seems he still finds it hard to talk about Freddie even now :( and for the record, I would have gone to see Queen + any f**king body that Brian & Roger care to bring on tour with them just for the chance to see and hear them live. Going under any name other than Queen would have been dumb & pointless! But that's just me :)
BTW: Roger is beautiful at any age.
cocolossal69 1 year ago
poor guy, look how wrinkly he is :(
Myview246 1 year ago
Queen without Freddie and John is not "Queen" for me anymore , nevertheless how good Paul is as a singer - Freddie is irreplacable nad unique he was. I went to the gig of them in 2005 and during the gig I couldn't stop thinking of Freddie and how it would be to see him again since 1986 when I had the honor to see him in concert...But that is my POV dunno what other true fans think...
TheBigHase 1 year ago
Roger Taylor is a fantastic person!
pjusiii 1 year ago
i'm completle in love with roger!!
i would give anything to born in the '40
kaznacheyeva 2 years ago 3
Eighteen years later you can still see the pain in Roger's face when he talks about Freddie. He misses him so as do the rest of us. :(
Yo1969Yo 2 years ago 3
I'm sorry but there's something so wrong about Paul Rogers singing Queen songs. He simply does not have the vocal range or stage presence. Sounds like terrible car wreck between Queen and Free. He's got that whole macho Bad Company persona and sound which doesn't suit Queen's material. The leather pants, shoddy hair piece and hairy chest are over the top for a geezer like Paul. I wish them the best of luck with their own material, though....
ritter89 2 years ago 2
To go out under a different name wouldn't have been "dumb", it would of been decent. Queen without Mercury is like Wings without Paul McCartney. Freddie was the essence of Queen.
ejgiv 2 years ago 3
Based on what Freddie says, we can maybe say that although it seems like Freddie does all the work or is the main person or whatever you want to say, he isn't. Brian, Roger, John and Freddie each do 25% of the work/contribution but yes it is true that Freddie is the most flamboyant on stage and a great entertainer and frontman.
SadnessIsEternal 2 years ago 2
My comment wasn't sent! Man!
To natacha45 and lots of other people: this comment is objective and factual.
Freddie Mercury has said before that all of them do like 25% of the work.
There is an interview where the lady doesn't understand and keeps asking him if he is the main person of Queen (I think). He tries to explain but she keeps asking so eventually he says yes. You can tell he doesn't mean it but just says it.
SadnessIsEternal 2 years ago
Roger actually seems to have gotten younger since this interview!!
musicsnobtobe 2 years ago 6
I agree!
dragonflytrumpeter 2 years ago
its the hair! : )
rogertaylorNr1 2 years ago 3
god hes old but theyre still a great band
mastersam93 2 years ago
i must admit i was totally suprised-i went seeing queen with paul rodgers live thinking i wouldnt be that into it. i knew they werent going to play my favorite songs (from the early albums) but wow. as soon as they started playing it was incredible! it was good to hear it all turned up! ive heard paul rodgers at the expo '92 with brian may and that was pretty good aswell.
derangedband 2 years ago
I know thier still great but lets be honest, with the Freddie era songs, Paul just doesnt cut the mustard does he.
Freddie, the greatest the world has ever seen.
R.I.P
My hero.
JaimeDaviesWelshHero 2 years ago 7
do you actually realise that Paul was actually Freddie's favourite singer for a long time!
that is a fact
if he's good enough for Freddie.....
5wmh37 2 years ago
ok im sorry but i hate it when paul rogers sings queens old music. he does it all wrong. no one can do it like freddie.
freddie forever <3
thattotallyrox 2 years ago 2
all people knows, but Paul is so talented!! and Freddie could be so proud of him, we all know that Freddie is the king, no matter what, and Paul just sings his songs good, but not like Freddie, they are very different :)
SillyLoveSongBeatles 2 years ago 3
yeeehh!! Paul is amazing!!! xD
I love you Roger!
SillyLoveSongBeatles 2 years ago
Roger Taylor is a fuckin legend... one of the best drummers ever
southernstar0946 2 years ago 7
Best drummer ever...
oscarivan1021 3 years ago 10
NO QUEEN WITHOUT FREDDIE! Brian and Roger are still very good, but they should change the name of the band if they want to go on with making music. No-one can replace incomparable man of genius called Freddie Mercury. Paul Rogers shouldn't sing the songs sung by Freddie and walk with the microphone like Freddie did. It's just ridiculous for someone who says that he doesn't want to copy Freddie. Let him sing his own songs instead of running off with Freddie's legacy.
natacha45 3 years ago 2
You do know that Brian came first then he found Roger then Fredie followed them around until they decided to add him. Then they found John. I mean I LOVE FREDDIE!!!! but they do it FOR Freddie, and trust me I am no big fan of paul's. Queen has to live on. Freddie said they be togther unitll they effen all die.
TheRealAmyLawson 3 years ago
It's just my opinion. You don't have to agree with me. I do know how this band was born. The name Queen was Freddie's idea. I am sure that without Freddie, although he joined the band later than Brian and Roger, this band would never be what it was. No-one would deny that. completely different and prob
natacha45 3 years ago
It surely wouldn't be that popular without Freddie just because Freddie was the one who could make this band legendary. Brian, Roger and John were certainly very good, but there is a big difference between being very good and being legendary. John didn't want to go on with Queen although I don't know whether it was because Freddie wasn't there anymore. I would believe it was the reason, but I am not sure.
natacha45 3 years ago
You don't have to agree with me either. And I do not like Paul Rogers!!! I miss Freddie singing the songs!!! But I don't except Brian and Roger to crawl into a hole!!
TheRealAmyLawson 3 years ago
You mean you don't accept Brian and Roger to crawl into a hole. Neither do I! I've never said that. Both of them are really great musicians. Just read my message once more. Wouldn't it be ridiculous if the Beatles would go on with the same name without John and George? You just can't be the same band with the same name. That's what I mean. It's great, that a lot of people can go to a concert and can enjoy the mucis of Queen, but I don't accept the name Queen without Freddie.
natacha45 3 years ago
but u have to accept the fact, briam, roger and john are still "the queen" even if our freddie is gone...i think it should be ridiculous if they change their name...
vergaska 2 years ago
Should I change my point of view because not everybody agrees with me?By the way, John is not a part of "the Queen" anymore. Should he also change up his mind? Brian, Roger and John are brilliant musicians, but it would be silly to deny that mainly Freddie made this band legendary. Just read the comments of the "Queen" fans here on YouTube. Most of them are about Freddie while he was only a part of the group. Doesn't it say enough?
natacha45 2 years ago
yes it's true, freddie was the soul of the band, but have u ever been in a "Queen more Paul Rogers" live? they always talk about freddie and with a big screen on their back shows their past and friendship...very exciting!!! paul rogers don't dares to sing bohemiam rhapsody!!!
vergaska 2 years ago
Freddie wasn't the whole band, changing the name just for him seems silly.
SignusMelko 3 years ago 3
Any idea why John Deacon didn't want to go on with "Queen"? I find Paul Rogers an offend for the band, and I am not the only one. But you don't have to agree with me. Freddie was the soul of the group. I am glad that Brian and Roger enjoy going on with making music and are satisfied with Paul Rogers, but for me it's not the old "Queen" anymore. Just call it "QueenII" or whatever.
natacha45 3 years ago
i completely agree with you. with no freddie there is no queen.
and this paul rogers guy really bothers me! especialy when he sings queens old music
thattotallyrox 2 years ago 5
that rocks!!!! ...R u Asshole??? this is not Queen, is Queen+PR...
oscarivan1021 3 years ago
poor roger is aging..i dont want that to happen i like 80s roger
mcskittle2424 3 years ago
no one can ever replace freddie, he was one of a kind
rogertaylorfan2k8 3 years ago 10
i think paul is great and all but he can never replace Freddie Mercury!!
XsmashthescilenceX 3 years ago 3
he looks like lars...a bit older
gianluigixxxx 3 years ago 2
Lars ulrich(from metallica) fits in well with QUEEN!
rip freddie
exreaperx123 3 years ago
What an insult comparing Roger Taylor to that angry chimp...
theunholy69 3 years ago 4
Why are these guys never able to tour Australia? Such a shame for the Queen fans here.
hogie2 3 years ago
iiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii aaaaaaaaaggggggggggrrrrrrrrreeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee withhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh yoooooooouuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuu
prajitheparrot 3 years ago
If you research some Queen history I am sure you'd get the answer. Australia didn't treat them very nice last time round.
merqury5 3 years ago
The narrow minded views of magazine reviewers from thirty years ago shouldn't stop them touring to play to dedicated fans here. Such a shame.
hogie2 3 years ago
Aww, Roger really misses Freddie, everyone was, it must have been so hard to hear for the first time he was dead.
nataliaaw 4 years ago 3
I saw the Queen/Paul Rogers tour last year in Washington, DC. It was absolutly fabulous. IT WAS FABULOUS!!! the sound was sharp. the playing was great and Paul- show me another big name that old that can still sing as crisp and powerfuly as him?? show me. there is none. He was awe-inspiring truly. In interviews he sounds like the nicest guy you could me and he is appreciative of what he has and of life.
shannonsmithsongs 4 years ago 5
I saw the Queen/Paul Rogers tour. And Paul Rogers did not to channel Freddie. He did an amazing job with the songs and I completely enjoyed it. Freddie would be pleased to know that their music was still being enjoyed live.
And Brian is better than ever.
jimmychipper 4 years ago
paul rodger's voice just doesn't fits :s queen is not queen without freddie and john, at least with john could be better :S
lovequeen2111 4 years ago 4
I hate paul rodgers he makes a mockery out of Queen's songs, brian and roger are far to nice, why do you think john deacon walked away!!
mattbhoy1970 4 years ago 2
John walking away has nothing 2 do with any of this. John chose 2 av nothing 2 do with Queen + PR.....coz he is retired, John retired from the music biz, soon after Freddie passed away, the last thing John ever did with Queen, was in 1997 (Rememeber, No-one But You (Only The Good Die Young). John no longer wants 2 b assosiated with the music biz, he prefers 2 b at home with his wife and childen and family.
TaylorMayed07 4 years ago
i don't like this paul rogers. he seems to believe it's cute to shake this mike stand but it looks really stupid!!
dreamezz 4 years ago
Definitively this guy IS NOT Freddie. :-\
tricolao 4 years ago
NO ESTA TRADUCIDA
leajovi 5 years ago
no soporto ver a queen sin freddie paul rodgers será muy bueno, no lo se, pero jamas nadie podrá reemplazar a freddie. VIVA FREDDIE CARAJO!!!
maxifit 5 years ago
Mto bommmmmmmmmm!!!
Viva o Queen!!!
RTBASS 5 years ago 2
"Mental Wallpaper" is my new favorite phrase. :D
mynameisPMS 5 years ago 2
who is the SOB that gave this a 4 and not a 5!?
clinicalpsychologist 5 years ago
omg!! i didn't realize how old he is now..awww. i was just watching some video when roger was sooo young. but roger looks a whole lot older than brian i think, even though he's actually younger. haha..and he's gained a bit of weight.
eclecticsound20 5 years ago
But he's lost some again since the North American tour. ;)
dragonflytrumpeter 5 years ago
@dragonflytrumpeter wooaaahhhh hr actually lost weight IN AMERICA!?!?! Omg thats like dividing by 0 - SHIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII....
FrankieSayRelaxxx1 1 year ago
Aw poor Roger, great man
fmbm 5 years ago 2
good interview, we all miss freddie to rog.
ims901 5 years ago 2
T_T Paul is copying Freddies special Mike stick thing..
Rfa999 5 years ago
When did freddie ever twirl a mic above his head...
cristina899 5 years ago
"Pak een stool" mohahaha
RogeRisTheKing 5 years ago
the only bad thing with thiz vid is that the sutitles are on dutch....
RogeRisTheKing 5 years ago
I know...well, at least there's no voice-over! :)
dragonflytrumpeter 5 years ago
yea ... that's good :D
RogeRisTheKing 5 years ago
queen rock.
ahopaikido 5 years ago
Cool ^__^
paperbackwalrus 5 years ago