It depends on where you live some cities classify bows as weapons and its illegal to discharge a weapon within city limits. Other areas have laws against using bows within a certain number of feet of residential dwellings. From what I can see in the video it's not like they have 5 acres of land. The houses look like they are right on top of each other, so he was probably in the wrong, but I could be wrong.
... and according to the law it ISN'T illegal to shoot a bow on your property because it ISNT a firearm. In response to a previous comment, "privately owned" property in NOT considered a "public place" so THAT ignorant theory can immediately be squashed.
I hope your goddamned neighbors who called those bastard cops learned a fucking lesson this day. It's a sad goddamned situ when the people we pay to protect us, instead violate our constitutional rights and harm us. They're going to try and rip your family apart and now your husband is in the system, where they want him.
Good luck, fellow patriot... you have our support.
@slickman911 You sir are a fucking idiot!!!! In what realm do you believe that it is legal for cops to come to you and start making up the law??? If it was me I wouldve shot as many of those fuckers that came on my property as I could have. I wouldve also told my wife that they had no right to open my fucking gate!!!!
@willsgotrythm42 Your argument is hollow because you don't say how they made it up. The man violated a municipal code with his crossbow. They got a call. It's their job to investigate, including ID him for warrants or probation. He refused to comply. They attempted to apprehend him, which is permitted under the full scope of the law. That's it. If you disagree with the law itself that they acted upon that's one thing, but it's fallacious to ignorantly claim they made it up. Srs?
@FinalStrife7 Do you know the actual law? If I shot a crossbow in my back yard would it be illegal? I dont think so. Yes I know when the cops are called the have a duty to investigate. Why would they attempt to apprehemend him? Does he have warrants? Why dont the cops tell you whats going on when you ask? And actually you dont have to "show your papers" to cops whenever they ask!!!!
ive only watched a min of this and i can already tell there white trash drunks that have no respect for the authoritys..who does this shit infront of there kids
@ozcrak The man they were trying to apprehend ran away. A criminal stepping onto his porch constitutes a cut-and-paste case of reasonable suspicion. Reasonable suspicion means a warrant (with an A, oh person who very clearly has studied so much of the law) is not necessary to go on the porch and arrest him.. ;)
hahaha the funny thing is...the guy thats getting arrested is my crazy uncle hahah and thats his crazy wife hahah shes so stupid ' this is ridiculess theres no reason for this ' STFU
Your husband provoked them, didn't comply, and was audibly heard saying he was going to resist...then the arresting officer tries to tell you what was happening and you said she was lying and that you did not want to cooperate...and you were expecting them to comply with your requests...they didnt allow him back into the house because as multiple officers said, the dont know him and what is in the house as far as weapons...pretty logical reasoning dont you think...?
sorry didn't know it took me citing the law for him to know that he cant do it. its called common since and if you have none like it sounds you dont then there no need to shoot it. what if he were to miss and hit a lil kid on the street or something then you would be on my side huh?
Hey he was arrested then there was a reason why refuse to do something when you know it is illegal? '' Oh he didn't know he couldn't do that'' if he does hunt and owned a boy and has any common cence at all he would know you can shoot it that close to a road
@Whatistheissue I can't agree more. If I violate someone's Constitutional rights, I go to prison. Bet these pigs only got a paid suspension or a smack on the hand, if anything.
Fascist pigs! The only real domestic terrorist we need to worry about are oppression enforcement officers. Welcome to the United Police States of America. Forget about Al-Queda phantoms abroad. Our real enemy is our own government.
Isn't that just like two bull dyke police officers? Trying to break up a heterosexual family by sending the husband off to jail for a prostate massage and leaving the wife and kids alone without a paycheck.
Those fucken pigs were scared to death of that camara. Every time someone films the police, they strike another blow for freedom.Our goverment and the pigs have been out of control for a long time.
You don't have to show an ID in this case. Period. Unless you are carrying a gun (legally), in a liquor store, or driving a vehicle, you do not need to have an ID. Plus, unless the cop was a first hand witness to a crime, he cannot search a home without owners consent or a warrant. Once again, the cops violating civil rights. It's only gonna get worse folks.
Well technically and morally if an arrest is a false one, any action by an officer is a form of assault and attempted kidnapping. If they complete the wrongful arrest they are kidnapping a citizen. Technically resisting a wrongful arrest is within your right as a human being and a defense against an assault. However it will never work unless there is a crowd of people with you to help you. However resisting such is much harder than cooperating.
If your husband didn't to anything wrong, then why is he resisting arrest? Why would he run if he didn't do anything wrong? Why did your husband assault a police officer if he did not do anything wrong? Why was your husband shooting a crossbow in a residential area? These people are the reason why we have police officers like this, To keep people from hurting themselves or others. They need ID to run your name through the system to see if you have any warrants for your arrest. Simple as that.
@killer505152 It's good to see that you are so conditioned to the coming police state. The New World Order/1 World Government just loves sheep like you. I don't need any cop or anyone else to police me or to keep me from hurting myself or others, I have control over myself. Granted the man should not have been shooting a crossbow. But the police can not search or seize your property without a warrant that is the 4Th amendment in a nutshell.
And YES, the husband DID do "something wrong", as the wife clearly admitted later in the clip. And YES, the police DID have the legal authority to require ID, as one officer clearly explained. Open and shut case, really.
@ModernGolfer Apparently not, since all charges were dropped in court. Read the update in the description. Clear 4th Amendment violation, open and shut case indeed.
Bullshit cops, I never just take it lyin down, question the police everybody! It states that we have the right to question authority without risking punishment, that's what distinguishes a free state from a police state. But on a funny note, imagine the stoner 2 houses down lookin out the window and seein all those cops and shit! Lol I woulda tripped.
why was this even posted, maybe your husband was in the wrong maybe he wasnt who knows but if the police are telling the truth they had every right to come there its illegal use of a deadly weapon in city limits, the police have a rule the suspect is not allowed to go back into the house cause they may grab a weapon and harm the police. and your being a bitch to the police why dont you just Ianswer their simple fucking questions
@Ryanligon72: No worries. I'm sure lots of people think this at first. Discharging weapons is legal in this city, if done under the constraints set by the law.
@1987bmansfield If they had proof of that, he would've been charged with discharging a crossbow within city limits. This was the excuse to search the man's house.
The police officers told her many times go back inside let them do their job. She was distracting them from doing so. Second they got a call of a man with a crossbow, (a deadly weapon) and they werent beating the crap out of him. If he had not have resisted the police than he wouldnt have been put to the ground. It does not matter where you are you can be charged with disorderly conduct? I am not sure what you mean by Im a crawfish? Go back to the south with all the other criminals...
this kind of "NOSEY" neighbor " MIND YOUR OWN BUSINESS " police 911 calls is what "WILL" begin to be the "DEMISE" of "YOU" people who make such calls...nothing better to do than be the " WATCH" of the hood ! and BULLSHIT " on the "bow and arrow" ! wow scary police work here..call swat next time ..barely escaped with their life there didnt ya? this is the "attitude" THAT WILL be adjusted soon, americans are tired of being labeled "terrorist" in their own back yards . unreal, sad, & ending
Sounds like you need to get a job lady. There are bad cops and good cops. I don't see these officers failing to comport themselves. Police ask FOR ID EVERYWHERE. If one has done something illegal what do police/Sheriff Deputies ask for ..... DUH!! I wonder if you forgot - THE MADE PHONE CALL - is all the probable cause they need and take it for what it is it wasn't an Officer that made it. A witness to what's going on - ask your neighbor that probably made the phone call.
So she admits he's outside with a crossbow and shooting at a target, done deal. Oh and then she says he was chased back into the house, chased means he was evading, your helping prove their case.
OK... IF YOU DIDNT SEE THE OFFICERS FACE WAS BLEEDING FROM HIM... I think thats assault on an officer. second he was shooting a bow and arrow illegly . third he tryed to run. When you argue it makes it worse it wont help
Never answer your door unless they slide a warrant under the door or in the window. then show your hands and tell them to kick in the door. I strongly recommend watching: Money as Debt, Michael Badnarik's Constitution Class 1 of 43, Are You a Sovereign Yet...
jesus christ you stupid bitch, shut up. HE GOT ARRESTED FOR REFUSING TO COOPERATE. just shut the fuck up and answer their questions!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
i had a sword and they needed 5 officers to surround me lol. they left after words. got a ride with my friend :p the sword was short replica. i as transporting it.
Sucks that people have so much animosity towards cops. It causes so many unnecessary conflicts. Cops, the vast vast majority, are dedicated public servants. If they tell you to do something it's because they think it's the right thing to do. Not because they are out to get people.
@garudadude Wrong, police instigate with over zealous aggression! Better do some research on that one. Im about to start a thesis paper specifically about this subject.
@helobelow Wow, a thesis paper? That means you couldnt be bias in any way I suppose. You could use this video as evidence. See how the officers are talking in a calm demeanor and treating her with respect while shes being confrontational and needlessly agitated? I suppose thats the kind of "over zealous aggression" you must be talking about.
@garudadude Maybe I misunderstood your statement. The people have a right under the law to resist unconstitutional behavior by police who on a whim think they can do whatever they want. If more young people would learn about the Constitution, why it was written as it is , and the warnings of deviating from it's basic principles, our more educated would understand the threat this seemingly innocent encounter would present.. Our public schools and teachers union have failed America miserably !
@helobelow you might want to do more research before you start that paper. People do not have the right to resist police. Even if the police officer is making an unconstitutional demand the person still has to follow the order. They can sue for the violation of their rights later but at the moment they have to do what they are told. Also, even if they could resist unconstitutional behavior, the police were acting perfectly lawful in this video. The lady is just being a ridiculous douche.
@garudadude Im not gonna debate this with you. You are simply wrong. She has no reason to comply with them unless there is eminent danger that they will need to prove.. No search warrant no get in and if it was my house it would be at great risk to their own welfare. Unfortunately according to this video they also found nothing after entering to conclude a crime was committed. Ching ching! That means in the civil suit that follows the tax payers give this husband and wife a nice settlement.
@helobelow Correct, she doesnt have to comply with them and she didnt and they respected that. According to the video they asked for consent to enter her house, she refused it and they sought a warrant to enter. They did everything professionally and in accordance with the law. She on the other hand was being a confrontational wench and obviously knows about as much as you do when it comes to law.
@lendog07 Good advice. I was naive enough to think he could be reasoned with. Now hes actually trying to argue about how adjectives can be used in a sentence. I'm not wasting more of my life. I surrender to his astounding stupidity....
@garudadude Ah, I think I get it now, your a civil servant yourself. Not to be confused with a lawyer as I can now tell your not by display of your vast ignorance. Keep Monday morning quarterbacking on you tube and when you first, read the Constitution, then please feel free to comment. You'd like for people to believe your an erudite but it's easy to see you have no more than a high school level or equivalent education. Please matriculate and use evidence to warrant assertions more concisely.
@helobelow Wow! You’re getting desperate. Bustin out the ol thesaurus and trying to use vocabulary to mask the fact you can’t refute anything I’ve said. Btw, erudite is an adjective not a noun. A person cannot be an erudite. You just look foolish when you use big words incorrectly.
@garudadude Its common place amongst scholars to refer ones of learned apprenticeships at the highest level as erudite, whether the instruction was formal or not, but it's implicitly evident you were the one who looked up the generic definition supplied by the internet, as that is about the extent of your knowledge. I implore you sir, how about try reading a book sometime. I have some recommendations; Dino The Dinosaur, Sammy The Seal or perhaps Curious George your autobiography.
@josacape Sry, dude. Thats some outdated case law from 1917. For contemporary case law see Fields v. State, 178 Ind. App. 350, 355, 382 N.E.2d 972, 975 (1978) holding that a private citizen may not use force or resist a peaceful arrest by one he knows or has good reason to believe is an authorized officer perform-ing his duties, regardless of whether the arrest is legal or illegal.
"We note that this appeal does not address issues that arise when an arrestee apprehends that the arresting officer is using excessive force and that unless the arrestee defends himself, he is likely to suffer great bodily harm or death. Nor does this appeal deal with issues that are presented when an unlawful arrest is attempted by one not known to be a law enforcement officer. Our holding is limited to the fact situation presented in the case at bar."~ Fields v. state
@josacape right, in that case they did not make any decision regarding whether or not it is illegal to resist excessive force. They just said that you cant resist an arrest. No matter if it is a legal or an illegal arrest. Also, I dont really see how this has become an issue of contention since there were no illegal arrests or excessive force exhibited in this video.
They didn't say you can't resist totally as your comment is led one to believe, they said (wrongly in my opinion) that since the "common law rule is outmoded" people shouldn't resist a "Peaceful arrest". You replied that my case law was outdated...you are simply wrong, as Fields v. states can not overturned Plummer v. State.
Apparently, in 1978 idiots wanted to turn horse shit in to law, and to proclaim that "common law rule is outmoded in today‟s modern society."
In Wise v. State, 401 N.E.2d 65, 68 (Ind. Ct. App. 1980), this court noted that Fields did not address the common law rule allowing a person to use force in resisting excessive force by an arresting officer.
@garudadude: Your cite is incorrectly formatted, so cannot be verified. Doesn't much matter anyhow, if it's an Indiana court decision. Indiana court decisions do not directly apply to Nebraska.
@Pafoofnik1 Sry, it wasnt a link. Its just the name of the case. It's an Indiana case because I was responding to josacape's citing of Plummer v. State; which is also an Indiana case. The case law is pretty much the same throughout all courts. Just check your local municipal ordinances and it will almost certainly say something to the effect of an unlawful arrest not being an affirmative defense for resisting.
@garudadude Obviously you have no inclination of how a research paper actually works. Please dont think yourself an intellect with absolutely no formal training what so ever because it's quite evident your a laymen. You back none of your assertions with facts, but thats not even it! Its about tone, like a good song writer GED man. Stick to arguing with the dumb friends you surround yourself with at your mothers house when drinking beer. The one eyed man is king in the land of the blind.
@garudadude Your initial premise is emphatically incorrect! What makes you think everything a cop does is in your best interest? What makes you think they provide safety? What makes you think their intent is for good? These are three very basic questions cause I do not mean to confuse you, but please respond so we can better understand your discontent discord!
@josacape Right on! I agree. Thanks for helping some people just think cops can trample through your house and get away with it. we need to get rid of the Patriot Act as well that is a major loss of our rights.
What is really scary is that one officer seemed to be trying to find a way to take their daughter away. Apparently for no reason other than that the mother had the audacity to video tape and ask the police why her husband was being taken away. I find it SICKENING that a police officer would attempt to throw his weight around like that and it shows complete disregard for the welfare of that child. SICKENING for that officer to try to use the child to get back at the parents.
I dnt think that im wrong, bt those police officers did not follow the rules...they say that they got hurt, bt the didn't call the fire department...they said that they were goign to tell u bt they end up tellin u that they got hurt...(wat they want u to feel sorry for them)...For one thing i kno, they did not follow procedures...
And one more thing- who probably suffers most? That cute daughter of yours who doesn't understand. In case you haven't figured it out, I'm a police officer. Whether I was right or not, under no circumstances would I ever want my children to see that kind of conduct from me, my wife, or from the police as a result of my behavior. If the police are wrong, the court will sort it out- there was simply no reason for her to see that. That probably bugs me the most about this video. It's ridiculious
was asked for ID, and then took off running. You keep saying that your husband doesn't have to show ID, why? He committed a violation, what Nebraska law allows him to just run off? People who think they are so well versed in law often cause themselves more problems. This setting is not a courtroom, and because he "thought" he knew laws better than the police, a simple warning turned into a felony. I'm all about understanding rights, but this is a clear example of not understanding. Good Luck
I'm not from Nebraska, I'm just going by the video, where the wife was explained by the police that shooting his crossbow in the park was a violation. If that is correct, then the request for his ID is fine, and if he ran, he had it coming I guess. I'm not 100% sure, but he was witnessed by a neighbor, he reportedly denied it to the police, and his wife agreed that he was out shooting it, this guy likely knew that he wasn't supposed to be doing this, why lie otherwise?
I thought that may have been the issue. He may very well have been shooting it safely, but I don't know, so I really can't argue the safety issue either way. He should've just identified himself, he probalby would've got a warning anyways, but if he was cited, articulate the safety issue in court I guess. But without seeing if there were other trailers behind the target, or areas for people to walk behind the target, it's hard to say. Brings up an interesting argument however.
@Pafoofnik1 The statute requires that firing a weapon in the city be done "in such a manner as to NOT endanger the safety of persons or property". I think this is what you meant to say.??
I guess his wife never agreed that he was shooting it, but she never denied it. I guess there was a target out there that she makes reference to at about the 8:50 mark. So my mistake-just wanted to clarify.
So there's 12 minutes of my life gone forever-the 10 mintues watching this BS, and the 2 that I must use to respond. This is one of the dumbest videos I've ever seen. Like most videos alleging police misconduct, it sure would be nice to have a video of the events that led up to your husband getting arrested. You keep repeating that your husband "did nothing," but yet you weren't even out there to see what caused the massive police response. It sounds like to me that he committed a violation.....
@jgwentworth1500 said: "its against the law to shoot a weapon in city limits"
This statement is not true. It's perfectly legal to shoot a crossbow in a city, Unless it is done in such a manner as to endanger the safety of person or property....
Obviously he tried to walk away because hes on the porch facing the door. It doesn't matter if its a crossbow or a bb gun its against the law to shoot a weapon in city limits and this lady is a lying annoying bad example for the kid.
@Pafoofnik1 its not a firearm, a fire arm is a hand gun or rifle anything that uses a propellant like gunpowder. A cross bow is not a firearm it is not the same thing. it should not be illegal to target practice with a cross bow in city limits, as long as you are safe with it and make sure no one or animal is in the line of fire then i have no problem with it.
trailer park?
JoeKickass324 1 week ago
It depends on where you live some cities classify bows as weapons and its illegal to discharge a weapon within city limits. Other areas have laws against using bows within a certain number of feet of residential dwellings. From what I can see in the video it's not like they have 5 acres of land. The houses look like they are right on top of each other, so he was probably in the wrong, but I could be wrong.
ec1032am 1 week ago
soon enough people will refuse this sort of thing by the only means left to us
rrr223 2 weeks ago
Jackboot Nazi pigs...this is really getting to seem like the norm these days. Sickening.
notaxian 2 weeks ago
... and according to the law it ISN'T illegal to shoot a bow on your property because it ISNT a firearm. In response to a previous comment, "privately owned" property in NOT considered a "public place" so THAT ignorant theory can immediately be squashed.
hvneuman 2 weeks ago
I hope your goddamned neighbors who called those bastard cops learned a fucking lesson this day. It's a sad goddamned situ when the people we pay to protect us, instead violate our constitutional rights and harm us. They're going to try and rip your family apart and now your husband is in the system, where they want him.
Good luck, fellow patriot... you have our support.
hvneuman 2 weeks ago
@hvneuman What rights were violated?
FinalStrife7 1 day ago
There goes a group og NAZI's wearing blue, America the new 3rd Reich.
trunkzdbz 3 weeks ago
You can't shoot a bow and arrow on your own property? What fascist state do you live in?
chowner 3 weeks ago
um he's shooting a bow in public which the officer said its illegal. then he ran from them as they approached him. im with the cops on this one.....
slickman911 1 month ago
@slickman911 You sir are a fucking idiot!!!! In what realm do you believe that it is legal for cops to come to you and start making up the law??? If it was me I wouldve shot as many of those fuckers that came on my property as I could have. I wouldve also told my wife that they had no right to open my fucking gate!!!!
willsgotrythm42 1 week ago
@willsgotrythm42 Your argument is hollow because you don't say how they made it up. The man violated a municipal code with his crossbow. They got a call. It's their job to investigate, including ID him for warrants or probation. He refused to comply. They attempted to apprehend him, which is permitted under the full scope of the law. That's it. If you disagree with the law itself that they acted upon that's one thing, but it's fallacious to ignorantly claim they made it up. Srs?
FinalStrife7 1 day ago
@FinalStrife7 Do you know the actual law? If I shot a crossbow in my back yard would it be illegal? I dont think so. Yes I know when the cops are called the have a duty to investigate. Why would they attempt to apprehemend him? Does he have warrants? Why dont the cops tell you whats going on when you ask? And actually you dont have to "show your papers" to cops whenever they ask!!!!
willsgotrythm42 1 day ago
@FinalStrife7 said: "The man violated a municipal code with his crossbow."
Cite this code you say exists...
Pafoofnik1 1 day ago
Comment removed
quantumcodex 1 month ago
12 cops for one bow n arrow? shes bullshit the story
J3RZ3YG0ESHAMxBTYx 1 month ago
ive only watched a min of this and i can already tell there white trash drunks that have no respect for the authoritys..who does this shit infront of there kids
J3RZ3YG0ESHAMxBTYx 1 month ago
lol no search warrent = get the fuck off my land
ozcrak 1 month ago
@ozcrak The man they were trying to apprehend ran away. A criminal stepping onto his porch constitutes a cut-and-paste case of reasonable suspicion. Reasonable suspicion means a warrant (with an A, oh person who very clearly has studied so much of the law) is not necessary to go on the porch and arrest him.. ;)
FinalStrife7 1 day ago
@FinalStrife7 said: "Reasonable suspicion means a warrant"
Not in the U.S.
Pafoofnik1 1 day ago
hahaha the funny thing is...the guy thats getting arrested is my crazy uncle hahah and thats his crazy wife hahah shes so stupid ' this is ridiculess theres no reason for this ' STFU
dkreviews411 1 month ago
Your husband provoked them, didn't comply, and was audibly heard saying he was going to resist...then the arresting officer tries to tell you what was happening and you said she was lying and that you did not want to cooperate...and you were expecting them to comply with your requests...they didnt allow him back into the house because as multiple officers said, the dont know him and what is in the house as far as weapons...pretty logical reasoning dont you think...?
Flexx312 2 months ago
Your husband provoe
Flexx312 2 months ago
sorry didn't know it took me citing the law for him to know that he cant do it. its called common since and if you have none like it sounds you dont then there no need to shoot it. what if he were to miss and hit a lil kid on the street or something then you would be on my side huh?
Rhsgrad2011 2 months ago
Hey he was arrested then there was a reason why refuse to do something when you know it is illegal? '' Oh he didn't know he couldn't do that'' if he does hunt and owned a boy and has any common cence at all he would know you can shoot it that close to a road
Rhsgrad2011 2 months ago
@Rhsgrad2011 said: "all he would know you can('t) shoot it that close to a road"
Did you mean can't shoot? If so, then please cite this law you says exists.
No one else has been able to.
Pafoofnik1 2 months ago
so, how did this end?
ericktb0 2 months ago
@Whatistheissue I can't agree more. If I violate someone's Constitutional rights, I go to prison. Bet these pigs only got a paid suspension or a smack on the hand, if anything.
galathonredd 3 months ago
hey lady you need to let the police do their jobs! Cops dont aresst people for nothing!
cftwalters 3 months ago
@cftwalters cops arrest people for all kinds of reasons. Cops suck!
TejasM14 2 months ago
@cftwalters seriously.... have you been asleep for the past... ohh i dont know, 5 centuries or more?
CyberWolf23 2 months ago
Fascist pigs! The only real domestic terrorist we need to worry about are oppression enforcement officers. Welcome to the United Police States of America. Forget about Al-Queda phantoms abroad. Our real enemy is our own government.
Hispandinavian 3 months ago
Isn't that just like two bull dyke police officers? Trying to break up a heterosexual family by sending the husband off to jail for a prostate massage and leaving the wife and kids alone without a paycheck.
GodIsACosmicAsshole 3 months ago 5
Fuck those cops! its just a bow and arrow....WTF!!! He was not firing a gun ! Just a bow on private property!
1badsharpshooter 3 months ago
Those fucken pigs were scared to death of that camara. Every time someone films the police, they strike another blow for freedom.Our goverment and the pigs have been out of control for a long time.
surfthecoochie1 3 months ago in playlist More videos from icebergtm
you should have filmed from outside why were you locked inside your home??
poor girl , you're messing with her mind screaming like crazy
MyWordizBond 3 months ago
haha there must be 15 cops there....
nikolasramsay 3 months ago
Police is always absolutly fucking stupid! period!
candon1972 3 months ago
Comment removed
johnnybagofdonets 3 months ago
You don't have to show an ID in this case. Period. Unless you are carrying a gun (legally), in a liquor store, or driving a vehicle, you do not need to have an ID. Plus, unless the cop was a first hand witness to a crime, he cannot search a home without owners consent or a warrant. Once again, the cops violating civil rights. It's only gonna get worse folks.
ElGatoLoco698 4 months ago
Well technically and morally if an arrest is a false one, any action by an officer is a form of assault and attempted kidnapping. If they complete the wrongful arrest they are kidnapping a citizen. Technically resisting a wrongful arrest is within your right as a human being and a defense against an assault. However it will never work unless there is a crowd of people with you to help you. However resisting such is much harder than cooperating.
yesiamanalien 4 months ago in playlist More videos from icebergtm
If your husband didn't to anything wrong, then why is he resisting arrest? Why would he run if he didn't do anything wrong? Why did your husband assault a police officer if he did not do anything wrong? Why was your husband shooting a crossbow in a residential area? These people are the reason why we have police officers like this, To keep people from hurting themselves or others. They need ID to run your name through the system to see if you have any warrants for your arrest. Simple as that.
killer505152 4 months ago
@killer505152 It's good to see that you are so conditioned to the coming police state. The New World Order/1 World Government just loves sheep like you. I don't need any cop or anyone else to police me or to keep me from hurting myself or others, I have control over myself. Granted the man should not have been shooting a crossbow. But the police can not search or seize your property without a warrant that is the 4Th amendment in a nutshell.
bobafettfan32 4 months ago
And YES, the husband DID do "something wrong", as the wife clearly admitted later in the clip. And YES, the police DID have the legal authority to require ID, as one officer clearly explained. Open and shut case, really.
ModernGolfer 4 months ago
@ModernGolfer Apparently not, since all charges were dropped in court. Read the update in the description. Clear 4th Amendment violation, open and shut case indeed.
galathonredd 3 months ago
Comment removed
ModernGolfer 4 months ago
Cops responded to a weapon call. Husband ran, apparently harmed a couple cops, husband was arrested. That's pretty straightforward.
Husband was, and should have been, taken to jail. Let the court sort it out.
Waste of time posting this.
ModernGolfer 4 months ago
Bullshit cops, I never just take it lyin down, question the police everybody! It states that we have the right to question authority without risking punishment, that's what distinguishes a free state from a police state. But on a funny note, imagine the stoner 2 houses down lookin out the window and seein all those cops and shit! Lol I woulda tripped.
Irishstoner42020 4 months ago
this bitch lives down the street from me
royadams37 5 months ago
unfucking believable.
DeutschlandSiegHeil 5 months ago
Comment removed
manlyman75 5 months ago
lol, i mean, 25 people don't understand how freedom works.
jookieloom 5 months ago
205 people don't understand how freedom works.
jookieloom 5 months ago
Typical police pushing their macho bullshit ...
ben5017 6 months ago
Bored cops, they all have to come and get a piece of the action.
MetalHeadKLR650 6 months ago in playlist Abusive Pigs
What ever happened to the police serving and protecting the PEOPLE
datpiffny 6 months ago
Let the police do their job you dumbass.
700mb700 6 months ago
just shoot em fuck these ppl cops rule civials suck. FUCK CIVILIANS
STiNGFiST77 6 months ago
@STiNGFiST77 you're such a sweet dude.
jbaltus11 5 months ago
@jbaltus11 lol i love you
STiNGFiST77 5 months ago
These people have anger management issues.
ben2028 6 months ago
why was this even posted, maybe your husband was in the wrong maybe he wasnt who knows but if the police are telling the truth they had every right to come there its illegal use of a deadly weapon in city limits, the police have a rule the suspect is not allowed to go back into the house cause they may grab a weapon and harm the police. and your being a bitch to the police why dont you just Ianswer their simple fucking questions
Ryanligon72 7 months ago
@Ryanligon72 said: "its illegal use of a deadly weapon in city limits"
Turns out this is not quite true. Read the previous comments
Pafoofnik1 7 months ago
@Pafoofnik1 oh sorry where im from you have to be out of city limits to use any kind of weapon that can cause harm to anyone
Ryanligon72 7 months ago
@Ryanligon72: No worries. I'm sure lots of people think this at first. Discharging weapons is legal in this city, if done under the constraints set by the law.
Pafoofnik1 7 months ago
@Pafoofnik1 ok thats seem to be a pretty good law there, that means my town sucks! lol
Ryanligon72 7 months ago
You're in a trailer park shooting a cross bow and you think thats ok?
1987bmansfield 7 months ago
@1987bmansfield If they had proof of that, he would've been charged with discharging a crossbow within city limits. This was the excuse to search the man's house.
ThePsycheAche 6 months ago
@1987bmansfield this is supposed to be a free country, people should be able to do anything they want in their damn yard
TruthNotDeath 6 months ago
this isnt illegal at all...just saying...bunch of bull
BoilinBond 7 months ago
The police officers told her many times go back inside let them do their job. She was distracting them from doing so. Second they got a call of a man with a crossbow, (a deadly weapon) and they werent beating the crap out of him. If he had not have resisted the police than he wouldnt have been put to the ground. It does not matter where you are you can be charged with disorderly conduct? I am not sure what you mean by Im a crawfish? Go back to the south with all the other criminals...
hodogetsmoney 7 months ago
@hodogetsmoney The police can not tell you to go inside if you are on your own private property.
Thjeca 7 months ago
@hodogetsmoney fuck you
GCockrell64 7 months ago
@GCockrell64 fuck you right down your throat. You pickle sniffing douche licker.
hodogetsmoney 7 months ago
what happened after all of this?
NanetteFan 8 months ago
where is this at?
NanetteFan 8 months ago
im confused
NanetteFan 8 months ago
"What an annoying bitch." Yeah really! How dare she pretend she even has rights!
cyberray 8 months ago
this kind of "NOSEY" neighbor " MIND YOUR OWN BUSINESS " police 911 calls is what "WILL" begin to be the "DEMISE" of "YOU" people who make such calls...nothing better to do than be the " WATCH" of the hood ! and BULLSHIT " on the "bow and arrow" ! wow scary police work here..call swat next time ..barely escaped with their life there didnt ya? this is the "attitude" THAT WILL be adjusted soon, americans are tired of being labeled "terrorist" in their own back yards . unreal, sad, & ending
youWILLlose2012 9 months ago
one word.....DUMB......good day
bg1420022002 9 months ago
this stupid BITCH is lucky she didnt get arrested
hodogetsmoney 9 months ago
@hodogetsmoney I hope your next!
semiLivedj 8 months ago
@semiLivedj Well i wont be there pal. You will because i know where you live.
hodogetsmoney 8 months ago
@hodogetsmoney Hahahaha,Come and get some! In the mean time,look out your window! PING
semiLivedj 8 months ago
@semiLivedj haha ok there pickle sniffer. I would if you had a window to look out of.
hodogetsmoney 8 months ago
@hodogetsmoney Name calling,Ok,Goofdick! Yeah,I dont have any windows.Dumbass.You must have flouride brains.
semiLivedj 8 months ago
@semiLivedj flouride brain good one, how long did it take u to come up with that one ?
hodogetsmoney 8 months ago
@semiLivedj haha flouride brains your clever how long did it take you to come up with that one...?
hodogetsmoney 8 months ago
@hodogetsmoney Goofdick. Im gonna use that one day
JoelakaDamian 8 months ago
@JoelakaDamian already did tard..
hodogetsmoney 8 months ago
@hodogetsmoney I didnt use it retard I just wrote it. Your a dumbass. Im out
JoelakaDamian 8 months ago
@JoelakaDamian k be out thank god im sick of seeing your messages you are a waist of time.
hodogetsmoney 8 months ago
@hodogetsmoney
Arrested for what??
CSATexan 7 months ago
@CSATexan interfering / obstructing a police officer. Borderline disturbing the peace. Disorderly conduct.
hodogetsmoney 7 months ago
@hodogetsmoney
Interfering with a police officer??
How did she do that? She was standing inside her house the whole time.
And the peace was disturbed by the cops beating the crap out of her husband.
Disorderly conduct??? How can someone be disorderly inside their own house???
Sounds like you are crawfishing
CSATexan 7 months ago
love making easy cash fast?? /watch?v=M1B3CuP7GpM
Ertmantis 9 months ago
Sounds like you need to get a job lady. There are bad cops and good cops. I don't see these officers failing to comport themselves. Police ask FOR ID EVERYWHERE. If one has done something illegal what do police/Sheriff Deputies ask for ..... DUH!! I wonder if you forgot - THE MADE PHONE CALL - is all the probable cause they need and take it for what it is it wasn't an Officer that made it. A witness to what's going on - ask your neighbor that probably made the phone call.
DetroitLove4U 9 months ago
lol a women cop...
sprjcube 9 months ago
What an annoying bitch. Shut the fuck up. You keep saying the same shit over and over.
jamesdewy2 10 months ago 2
@jamesdewy2 I hope your next!
semiLivedj 8 months ago
So she admits he's outside with a crossbow and shooting at a target, done deal. Oh and then she says he was chased back into the house, chased means he was evading, your helping prove their case.
rayrayridgecrest 10 months ago
So she admits he's outside with a crossbow and shooting at a target, done deal.
rayrayridgecrest 10 months ago
This lady is coo coo for coco puffs.
Machineguncody 10 months ago
Find the neighbor...bye bye jackass
Crowwolf7 10 months ago
@TheArmydude654 said: "second he was shooting a bow and arrow illegly ."
No one has been able to come up with any proof of this.
Pafoofnik1 11 months ago
OK... IF YOU DIDNT SEE THE OFFICERS FACE WAS BLEEDING FROM HIM... I think thats assault on an officer. second he was shooting a bow and arrow illegly . third he tryed to run. When you argue it makes it worse it wont help
TheArmydude654 11 months ago
Never answer your door unless they slide a warrant under the door or in the window. then show your hands and tell them to kick in the door. I strongly recommend watching: Money as Debt, Michael Badnarik's Constitution Class 1 of 43, Are You a Sovereign Yet...
Corporate thugs.
TruthSmack 11 months ago
"The poorest man may, in his cottage, bid defiance to all the forces
of the Crown. It may be frail; its room may shake; the wind may blow
through it; the storm may center; the rain may enter but the King of
England may not enter." William Pitt 1763
TruthSmack 11 months ago
jesus christ you stupid bitch, shut up. HE GOT ARRESTED FOR REFUSING TO COOPERATE. just shut the fuck up and answer their questions!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
creamyfilling102 11 months ago
@creamyfilling102 Don't worry you or you mom is next.
TruthSmack 11 months ago
well they DID say they weren't doing anything wrong, which in a cop's average day, usually means that they're innocent.
creamyfilling102 11 months ago
OMG ur voice is like Nails on a Chalk Board
homiej76 11 months ago
i had a sword and they needed 5 officers to surround me lol. they left after words. got a ride with my friend :p the sword was short replica. i as transporting it.
bergil210 11 months ago
Sucks that people have so much animosity towards cops. It causes so many unnecessary conflicts. Cops, the vast vast majority, are dedicated public servants. If they tell you to do something it's because they think it's the right thing to do. Not because they are out to get people.
garudadude 11 months ago
@garudadude yeah im sure the cops have nothing do with that. >_>
ambigroove 11 months ago
@ambigroove I really doubt cops do. People just love to instigate some drama with the police. Its a fad. Case in point, this video.
garudadude 10 months ago
@garudadude Wrong, police instigate with over zealous aggression! Better do some research on that one. Im about to start a thesis paper specifically about this subject.
helobelow 10 months ago
@helobelow Wow, a thesis paper? That means you couldnt be bias in any way I suppose. You could use this video as evidence. See how the officers are talking in a calm demeanor and treating her with respect while shes being confrontational and needlessly agitated? I suppose thats the kind of "over zealous aggression" you must be talking about.
garudadude 10 months ago
@garudadude Maybe I misunderstood your statement. The people have a right under the law to resist unconstitutional behavior by police who on a whim think they can do whatever they want. If more young people would learn about the Constitution, why it was written as it is , and the warnings of deviating from it's basic principles, our more educated would understand the threat this seemingly innocent encounter would present.. Our public schools and teachers union have failed America miserably !
helobelow 10 months ago
@helobelow you might want to do more research before you start that paper. People do not have the right to resist police. Even if the police officer is making an unconstitutional demand the person still has to follow the order. They can sue for the violation of their rights later but at the moment they have to do what they are told. Also, even if they could resist unconstitutional behavior, the police were acting perfectly lawful in this video. The lady is just being a ridiculous douche.
garudadude 10 months ago
@garudadude Im not gonna debate this with you. You are simply wrong. She has no reason to comply with them unless there is eminent danger that they will need to prove.. No search warrant no get in and if it was my house it would be at great risk to their own welfare. Unfortunately according to this video they also found nothing after entering to conclude a crime was committed. Ching ching! That means in the civil suit that follows the tax payers give this husband and wife a nice settlement.
helobelow 10 months ago
@helobelow Correct, she doesnt have to comply with them and she didnt and they respected that. According to the video they asked for consent to enter her house, she refused it and they sought a warrant to enter. They did everything professionally and in accordance with the law. She on the other hand was being a confrontational wench and obviously knows about as much as you do when it comes to law.
garudadude 10 months ago
@garudadude Well said. helobelow is a complete idiot... dont even waste your time fighting this retard....
lendog07 10 months ago
@lendog07 Good advice. I was naive enough to think he could be reasoned with. Now hes actually trying to argue about how adjectives can be used in a sentence. I'm not wasting more of my life. I surrender to his astounding stupidity....
garudadude 10 months ago
@garudadude Ah, I think I get it now, your a civil servant yourself. Not to be confused with a lawyer as I can now tell your not by display of your vast ignorance. Keep Monday morning quarterbacking on you tube and when you first, read the Constitution, then please feel free to comment. You'd like for people to believe your an erudite but it's easy to see you have no more than a high school level or equivalent education. Please matriculate and use evidence to warrant assertions more concisely.
helobelow 10 months ago
@helobelow Wow! You’re getting desperate. Bustin out the ol thesaurus and trying to use vocabulary to mask the fact you can’t refute anything I’ve said. Btw, erudite is an adjective not a noun. A person cannot be an erudite. You just look foolish when you use big words incorrectly.
garudadude 10 months ago
@garudadude Its common place amongst scholars to refer ones of learned apprenticeships at the highest level as erudite, whether the instruction was formal or not, but it's implicitly evident you were the one who looked up the generic definition supplied by the internet, as that is about the extent of your knowledge. I implore you sir, how about try reading a book sometime. I have some recommendations; Dino The Dinosaur, Sammy The Seal or perhaps Curious George your autobiography.
helobelow 10 months ago
@garudadude
“Citizens may resist unlawful arrest to the point of taking an arresting officer's life if necessary.” Plummer v. State, 136 Ind. 306.
josacape 10 months ago
@josacape Sry, dude. Thats some outdated case law from 1917. For contemporary case law see Fields v. State, 178 Ind. App. 350, 355, 382 N.E.2d 972, 975 (1978) holding that a private citizen may not use force or resist a peaceful arrest by one he knows or has good reason to believe is an authorized officer perform-ing his duties, regardless of whether the arrest is legal or illegal.
garudadude 10 months ago
@garudadude
"We note that this appeal does not address issues that arise when an arrestee apprehends that the arresting officer is using excessive force and that unless the arrestee defends himself, he is likely to suffer great bodily harm or death. Nor does this appeal deal with issues that are presented when an unlawful arrest is attempted by one not known to be a law enforcement officer. Our holding is limited to the fact situation presented in the case at bar."~ Fields v. state
josacape 10 months ago
@josacape right, in that case they did not make any decision regarding whether or not it is illegal to resist excessive force. They just said that you cant resist an arrest. No matter if it is a legal or an illegal arrest. Also, I dont really see how this has become an issue of contention since there were no illegal arrests or excessive force exhibited in this video.
garudadude 10 months ago
@garudadude
They didn't say you can't resist totally as your comment is led one to believe, they said (wrongly in my opinion) that since the "common law rule is outmoded" people shouldn't resist a "Peaceful arrest". You replied that my case law was outdated...you are simply wrong, as Fields v. states can not overturned Plummer v. State.
josacape 10 months ago
@garudadude
It's your opinion as to the legality of the arrest here, and also your opinion of what's excessive force. Other's may disagree with your opinion.
josacape 10 months ago
@garudadude
Apparently, in 1978 idiots wanted to turn horse shit in to law, and to proclaim that "common law rule is outmoded in today‟s modern society."
In Wise v. State, 401 N.E.2d 65, 68 (Ind. Ct. App. 1980), this court noted that Fields did not address the common law rule allowing a person to use force in resisting excessive force by an arresting officer.
josacape 10 months ago
@garudadude: Your cite is incorrectly formatted, so cannot be verified. Doesn't much matter anyhow, if it's an Indiana court decision. Indiana court decisions do not directly apply to Nebraska.
Pafoofnik1 10 months ago
@Pafoofnik1 Sry, it wasnt a link. Its just the name of the case. It's an Indiana case because I was responding to josacape's citing of Plummer v. State; which is also an Indiana case. The case law is pretty much the same throughout all courts. Just check your local municipal ordinances and it will almost certainly say something to the effect of an unlawful arrest not being an affirmative defense for resisting.
garudadude 10 months ago
@garudadude: I see no reason for me to check it out. I'm not the one that said that Fields v. State applies here.
Pafoofnik1 10 months ago
@garudadude Obviously you have no inclination of how a research paper actually works. Please dont think yourself an intellect with absolutely no formal training what so ever because it's quite evident your a laymen. You back none of your assertions with facts, but thats not even it! Its about tone, like a good song writer GED man. Stick to arguing with the dumb friends you surround yourself with at your mothers house when drinking beer. The one eyed man is king in the land of the blind.
helobelow 10 months ago
@garudadude Your initial premise is emphatically incorrect! What makes you think everything a cop does is in your best interest? What makes you think they provide safety? What makes you think their intent is for good? These are three very basic questions cause I do not mean to confuse you, but please respond so we can better understand your discontent discord!
helobelow 10 months ago
@helobelow
I'll answer your questions...
1, it's not.
2, they don't.
3, their intent is not for good.
josacape 10 months ago
@josacape Right on! I agree. Thanks for helping some people just think cops can trample through your house and get away with it. we need to get rid of the Patriot Act as well that is a major loss of our rights.
helobelow 10 months ago
@helobelow
Yes we do.
josacape 10 months ago
dumb bitch
dannyledwith21 11 months ago
What is really scary is that one officer seemed to be trying to find a way to take their daughter away. Apparently for no reason other than that the mother had the audacity to video tape and ask the police why her husband was being taken away. I find it SICKENING that a police officer would attempt to throw his weight around like that and it shows complete disregard for the welfare of that child. SICKENING for that officer to try to use the child to get back at the parents.
amalt37 11 months ago
Why don't those shitbags go pick up the Banksters on Wall Street?
usergently 11 months ago
Comment removed
mariosheep64 11 months ago
I dnt think that im wrong, bt those police officers did not follow the rules...they say that they got hurt, bt the didn't call the fire department...they said that they were goign to tell u bt they end up tellin u that they got hurt...(wat they want u to feel sorry for them)...For one thing i kno, they did not follow procedures...
NicoBabiiBro 11 months ago
And one more thing- who probably suffers most? That cute daughter of yours who doesn't understand. In case you haven't figured it out, I'm a police officer. Whether I was right or not, under no circumstances would I ever want my children to see that kind of conduct from me, my wife, or from the police as a result of my behavior. If the police are wrong, the court will sort it out- there was simply no reason for her to see that. That probably bugs me the most about this video. It's ridiculious
DMarklin25 11 months ago
was asked for ID, and then took off running. You keep saying that your husband doesn't have to show ID, why? He committed a violation, what Nebraska law allows him to just run off? People who think they are so well versed in law often cause themselves more problems. This setting is not a courtroom, and because he "thought" he knew laws better than the police, a simple warning turned into a felony. I'm all about understanding rights, but this is a clear example of not understanding. Good Luck
DMarklin25 11 months ago
@DMarklin25: Please cite the statute he was violating by shooting a crossbow.
Please, please, please read the statute before you cite it, especially if you stumble onto 9.36.050.
Pafoofnik1 11 months ago
@Pafoofnik1 :
I'm not from Nebraska, I'm just going by the video, where the wife was explained by the police that shooting his crossbow in the park was a violation. If that is correct, then the request for his ID is fine, and if he ran, he had it coming I guess. I'm not 100% sure, but he was witnessed by a neighbor, he reportedly denied it to the police, and his wife agreed that he was out shooting it, this guy likely knew that he wasn't supposed to be doing this, why lie otherwise?
DMarklin25 11 months ago
@Pafoofnik1 :
Ok, I read the statute that you cited above- I'm not seeing issue with it.....your thoughts? I'm curious.
DMarklin25 11 months ago
@DMarklin25: The statute requires that firing a weapon in the city be done "in such a manner as to endanger the safety of persons or property".
I don't see anywhere in this video that supports that requirement.
Pafoofnik1 11 months ago
@Pafoofnik1
I thought that may have been the issue. He may very well have been shooting it safely, but I don't know, so I really can't argue the safety issue either way. He should've just identified himself, he probalby would've got a warning anyways, but if he was cited, articulate the safety issue in court I guess. But without seeing if there were other trailers behind the target, or areas for people to walk behind the target, it's hard to say. Brings up an interesting argument however.
DMarklin25 11 months ago
@Pafoofnik1 The statute requires that firing a weapon in the city be done "in such a manner as to NOT endanger the safety of persons or property". I think this is what you meant to say.??
TheDano1947 11 months ago
@Pafoofnik1
I guess his wife never agreed that he was shooting it, but she never denied it. I guess there was a target out there that she makes reference to at about the 8:50 mark. So my mistake-just wanted to clarify.
DMarklin25 11 months ago
@DMarklin25: No prob. I imagine his mistake, if any, was if he decided not to be arrested. If he did...
Pafoofnik1 11 months ago
So there's 12 minutes of my life gone forever-the 10 mintues watching this BS, and the 2 that I must use to respond. This is one of the dumbest videos I've ever seen. Like most videos alleging police misconduct, it sure would be nice to have a video of the events that led up to your husband getting arrested. You keep repeating that your husband "did nothing," but yet you weren't even out there to see what caused the massive police response. It sounds like to me that he committed a violation.....
DMarklin25 11 months ago
@jgwentworth1500 said: "its against the law to shoot a weapon in city limits"
This statement is not true. It's perfectly legal to shoot a crossbow in a city, Unless it is done in such a manner as to endanger the safety of person or property....
SOURCE: Lincoln, Nebraska law 9.36.050
Pafoofnik1 1 year ago
Thumbs up for Lincoln Cops, thumbs down for annoying bitch who thinks she knows the law better than the police.
jgwentworth1500 1 year ago
Obviously he tried to walk away because hes on the porch facing the door. It doesn't matter if its a crossbow or a bb gun its against the law to shoot a weapon in city limits and this lady is a lying annoying bad example for the kid.
jgwentworth1500 1 year ago
1. illegal use of a firearm within city limits.
2. allegedly walked away when law enforcement arrived.
3. refused to give identification to law enforcement.
4. resisting arrest.
5. assault on officer (two counts)
6.your annoying voice didn't make it better.
7. you asked "what was happening" (multiple times) the officers told you, you told them to stop because it was not the answer you wanted.
8. lovely little act to pull in front of a child.
pcgameacc 1 year ago
@pcgameacc: "illegal use of a firearm within city limits."
Really? Care to cite the law?
Pafoofnik1 1 year ago
@Pafoofnik1 its not a firearm, a fire arm is a hand gun or rifle anything that uses a propellant like gunpowder. A cross bow is not a firearm it is not the same thing. it should not be illegal to target practice with a cross bow in city limits, as long as you are safe with it and make sure no one or animal is in the line of fire then i have no problem with it.
turgeo2004 8 months ago
@turgeo2004: Agreed. Actually it is legal to practice with a firearm in the city. A quick search through these comments will get you more info.
Pafoofnik1 8 months ago
This woman needs a good slap, her voice is like chalk on a blackboard
ArmyReconScout 1 year ago
That's funny. You're in your own house being asked who your are. What kind of messed up shit is that.
ghana25 1 year ago
not to mention a bow and arrow is a fire arm and you cannot discharge them in city limits.. so duh read the law you retards
Assebaum 1 year ago
@Assebaum:Please cite this law you just made up. Thanks.
Pafoofnik1 1 year ago