So, chopping off the most sensitive part of your penis makes you a man? Hate to tell you, but if having a penis makes you a man, then having less of a penis makes you less of a man...and one who will never have a normal sex live that nature intended you to have.
@Tandykane It just removes the foreskin, and its supposed to be the pain and the fact that your penis is now "that" makes you a man. Like I said its just the foreskin, 30% of Americans have been circumcised and it`s not really that bad without foreskin, once your erect it`s the same thing. But I see your point, but it wasn't my decision either, it was my family`s but I don`t mind it either way.
@Tandykane It just removes the foreskin, and its supposed to be the pain and the fact that your penis is now "that" makes you a man. Like I said its just the foreskin, 30% of Americans have been circumcised and it`s not really that bad without foreskin, once your erect it`s the same thing. But I see your point, but it wasn't my decision either, it was my family`s but I don`t mind it either way.
If you are circumcised and not happy about it or if you are intact and want to do something to help stop unnecessary circumcision, please visit foregen.org
this is inhumane (yea, i'm circumcised, but i was porn at l'hopital de paris, where it was safe.) here they could DIE, in horrid retched pain, and its done at an older age where you feel every last cut.
Circumcision is never "SAFE". even in best conditions, infants die from circumcision.
Circumcision IS inhumane regardless of age or situations.
And it is a myth that adults feel more pain-- they do not need to have their penis ripped apart, get full anesthesia, and feel pain less acutely than do infants.
@Tandykane - You really are a perverted old troll, aren't you? Your whole pleasure is to troll circumcision videos on YouTube, posting the same shit, over and over. No medical practice is 100% safe, you fucking idiot- and no one claims otherwise. The risks are MINIMAL and ISOLATED in western countries, and if developed more here, would be the same. No one needs to "justify" anything to you,you fucking loser- get a life and do something meaningful with your shallow, uneventful life.
@Tandykane- Now sensitivity loss is 100%?! Bwa ha ha ha ha- what a complete fucking idiot you are. First you can't substantiate your LIE of 3/4 loss, then you changed it to this? You really are a knucklehead:) I have stated the reasons for why it's acceptable- Your opinion is STILL null and worthless: again: Since the practice has been justified by parents- under the law- and under the privacy and protection they have with thier physician: Why do they need to "justify" anything to you?
LOL, I cannot follow your thinking process because it is not rational or logical. it is all rebuttal by assumption, and assumption that is illogical and a conclusion drawn from it also illogical
Sorry silly word games don't work here, I challenged your assertion that simply because you believe men are happy to be cut is not evidence that it is good--belief means nothing. What did you not understand about about the evidence?
@Tandykane People have there wisdom teeth removed for no reason at all. I fefused to have mine removed because they help chew food. But you really don't need a foreskin at all. And the only harmful thing about circumcision is the few minutes of pain it takes, but then you get a lifetime of benefits.
@Tandykane It is true you lose sensitivity. But how is that a bad thing? You'll last longer in bed. Orgasms are the exact same whether your cut or not. And 3/4 of sensitivity is bullshit. You'll lose 1/8 sensitivitiy at most. And parents force there kids to get there wisdom teeth removed right when they start coming in, even if they are doing no harm. Benefits: less dirty, longer sex, looks better.
Soory, but your assumption is wrong--the Scandinavians found that cut men suffer MORE often from PE..and the O'Hara study showed that KNOWING women do NOT appreciate prolonged sex with a cut penis..too rough, abrasive and irritating.
I asked for PROVEN benefits, not myths and superstitions--so, got any?
Loss:
Fine-touch pressure thresholds in the adult penis Morris L. Sorrells, James L. Snyder, Mark D. Reiss 2 0 07 BJU INTERNATIONAL 2007
@Tandykane Well, 35% of the world is circumcised. You were wrong. Yes it is less dirty, that is a proven fact. And you said yourself you lose sesitivity, so that means longer sex. Looks better in my country, don't know about you though.
It is cleaner in multiple ways, smells less, last longer in bed, easier to put a condom on. I know most guys will clean under the foreskin. But they won't clean it when they are kids. It will never be cleaned for around 11 years.
@Tandykane No, it's 30%. Go to wikipedia and look up "Prevalence of circumcision". And I agree most guys will clean it. But I highly dought kids will clean under there foreskin when they shower, so it will get infected.
Please explain how circumcision is so bad if 30% of the world had it done?
And you believe something posted on Wikipedia? Google this and use the numbers and figure it out for yourself..
Ten Countries with the Highest Population in the World
So, it is good because you doubt kids know how to clean themselves? My grandson is 4, and he knows how to do it--and DOES it! This is what you think of as evidence? Get infected? Evidence?
Sorry, but "rebuttal by assumptions" is also not evidence.
@Tandykane LOL, Your a grandpa? I can't beleive a grandpa was argueing with a kid over the internet. And why the fuck do you watch your grandson clean his dick? And it is probably higher then 30% now that I think about it. They only measure circumcisions done in hospitals, and a lot of circumcisions are donw out of the hospital. It is probably around 40%. It woule be higher but china has so many people that don't do it.
@Tandykane Well thanks for answering my questions from the last video. Sarcasm incase you are to stupid to tell. I'm not saying that men can't clean themselfs, i'm saying that kids won't. See ya grandpa!
You are confusing common sense with sarcasm..it was merely meant to show how ridiculous your assertion is.
IF you are saying that kids won't clean themselves, where is your evidence to support this claim--or is this yet another myth you believe but cannot support with any evidence?
@Tandykane Well you would know I guess, you already watch you grandkid pull his foreskin back and clean his dick. But listen gramps, circumcision might of not been as big as when you were a kid, the 30's I'm guessing. But now it is a big part of life because it has no bad sideffects.
No bad side effects? What about the PROVEN of the majority of penile nerves which results in a loss of up to 3/4 of the penile sensation and sensitivity, linking to erectile impairment, premature ejaculation, and dozens and dozens of other bad side effects.
But don't let the facts and evidence get in your way.
@Tandykane Where did you get 3/4 from, gramps? And as I already stated, you will last much longer in bed. And you said there were dozens more bad side effects, so give me atleast 24 more. What is erectile impairment exaclty? And I don't get you, you said it takes away nerves then you say premature ejaculation may happen. Premature ejaculation occurs when the penis gets to sensitive to fast.
@Tandykane Give me those links to those journal pages. And no wonder it if bias against circumcision, they are both from england. The reason I keep on repeating the same "myths" is because you keep on dodging the same questions.
Sorry, but youtube does not allow posting of links--you should be able to google them.
WHO cares where they come from? OR are you now trying to claim that only AMERICAN studies are valid?
Now after you have read them, please refute them with valid evidence, and THEN perhaps YOU can START supplying something resembling facts and evidence--I am tired of spoon-feeding you and have you summarily dismissing them for no rational or logical reason.
C'mon, let's get real here for once..I have supplied you evidence debunking nearly every one of your myths, and for you to pretend otherwise by ignoring them or simply dismissing themis downright childish.
@Tandykane Thank you for dodging the same questions again. To get this out of the way, either give me a link to read those articles because I can't find them anywhere, or they don't exist.
1. What does "circ" mean?
2. What does that have to do with this?
3. Define a "normal penis"
Off topic, but I get the feeling you lied about being a grandpa.
what does that have to do with what? I have no idea what this is supposed to men?
A normal penis is one that is defined by what every infant (outside of birth defects) & by the majority of people in the world--and that NORMAL is a complete one with an erogenous foreskin.
I could acre less what you believe since so far, none of your beliefs are supported by evidence and/or facts.
NOW, ON TOPIC--what is YOUR comment on American bias?
2. can't ignore the Sorrels and Taylor study. Sorry all surgery has inherent risks, and no risks if not done--childish assumption.
3. Until you provide actual evidence, another myth.
4. SIMPLE--there are NO PROVEN benefits, and lot's of PROVEN harm and risks..therefore NO rational justification for circumcision--in fact the opposite.
5 Spare me this childish nonsense about answers you have been given.
@Tandykane It is easier to clean because there is less skin. Enough said. I never heard of that story. Thank you for dodgeing that question. Yes, over 30% of the world had it done, it must be so bad.
You are also ignoring the fact that it is a tradition
@doctorseaweed2 Tradition justifies nothing. And how can you justify "easier to clean" in the modern day? We all have access to hot water and soap (the latter isn't even necessary). If you aren't washing your genitals at least a few times a week, there is something wrong. Are you trying to argue that circumcision is a substitute to proper hygiene? The fact that 30% of the world practices it doesn't justify it; you are merely appealing to common practice, a classic example of fallacious logic.
Easier? Wow, yes, one must spend days scrubbing and washing? :) Retract, rinse, retract (10 seconds)is so onerous,that it is better to chop off the most sensitive part of one's genitals?
To claim this "easier" is a sheer sign of stupidity.
BTW, you better check up on the "30% you claim with some real numbers and not just accept questionable OPINIONS.
@Tandykane Well you admitted it was easier finnaly :) Cleaning for 10 seconds won't get rid of all the germs and they will build up after awhile. Circumcision makes it 100% clean. And it is 30%, wikipedia says that.
@Tandykane Then why did you copy and paste all your "evidence" from wikipedia? And I never said cleaning for 10 seconds was a bad task you blind moron. I said it is so much easier to get dirty, even if you clean a lot. Don't change the topic next comment, gramps.
Oh, Cmon, if you had actually bothered to check my cites, you will see that I cite the medical articles themselves.
And you have a very distorted sense of morality, advocating the mutilation of children for something as stupid as it taking 10 seconds to wash oneself.
@Tandykane I'm not retarded. You were linking me to a virus site. Look, circumcision has been going on for 1000's of years. And the only people who complain about it are not circumcised.
Yph, that's the modus operendi--just pretend that your ignorant beliefs and assumptions have more merit that a peer-reviewed medical study..deny what you dislike!
yes, you ARE STUPID--as shown by your abject ignorance and desperately choosing to remain that wat.
Why, because there are many aspects of circumcision that you never address and yet still need to be covered--and that you are too busy with ad hominem attacks to address.
When you say grammar, do you really mean spelling?
@doctorseaweed2 I know its difficult, but this tandykane person should just be ignored. not because he's neccesarily wrong,but simply because he's a hater. I'm a cut man who has NEVER had any of the thousands of problems this zealot makes claims to.I AM against RIC (my son is not cut) .but making people try to feel like less when they are in fact not is just plain evil. my advice is to find someone less vitriolic to argue with. best of luck
"Well you would know I guess, you already watch you grandkid pull his foreskin back and clean his dick." I would like to know just HOW you reached this conclusion when I said, that my grandson knows how to clean himself and does it? Into transference because YOU watch your sons wash their dicks? Assumptions sometimes reveal more than people intend to reveal.
"Circumcision removes the most sensitive part of a man's penis. The five most sensitive areas of the penis are on the foreskin. The transitional region from the external to the internal foreskin is the most sensitive region of the fully intact penis, and more sensitive than the most sensitive region of the circumcised penis.
-----------------------
Fine-Touch Pressure Thresholds In The Adult Penis
In a study investigating the adequacy of condom sizes, Richters, Gerofi, and Donovan noted that circumcised men had significantly shorter erect penises by a mean length of 8mm than genitally intact men (p<.05). The difference in erect penile size was attributed to insufficient skin to accomodate the erection.
Richters J, Gerofi J,Donovan B. Are condoms the right size(s)? A method for self-measurement of the erect penis. Venereology 1995;8:77-81
LiKe my BF Maggs does a lot of anal and she says cut cock is better for anal cause uncut cock gets dirty after anal and doesn't taste good like cut cock.
If you don't like the taste of anal stick to cut cock. Uncut cock tastes like shit after anal.
Was it a mistake or deliberate? Some Jewish rabbis claim that the ONLY reason their god made and maintains the Universe is so there can be circumcisions.
According to the O'Hara study, the majority of women who have had normal and cut sex overwhelmingly (87%) prefer the normal kind--many for exactly the reason you suggest.
Because objective SCIENTIFIC evidence shows that circumcised men suffer a loss of up to 3/4 of their penile sensation and sensitivity with no PROVEN benefit.
@miles2057, if you feel that you "have a tube sock" on your dick, then you may have a defective foreskin. The foreskin normally rolls back from the glans on erection or with "in-out" motion. In the event that you do have a problem foreskin, there may be far better, less invasive, ways to correct it than by circumcision. Foreskin is highly innervated, sexually functional tissue.
Uncut men and boys enjoy bareback anal sex far more than men whose cocks have been mutilated by Medical Doctors/Penis-Butchers.
As a decorated Gay Police Officer, I support a NATIONWIDE BAN on male genital mutilation and fine enforcement of up to $1000 or One Year Imprisonment for criminal offenders.
If you choose NOT to follow the law and choose to circumcise your son, I can promise this, you will go to prison for child abuse and your baby will be taken into custody by Child Protective Services
@Tandykane Just use google... every medical site regarding Circumcision will tell you that the head is more sensitive, just use your common sense, how can foreskin protect the glans if it's more sensitive?
Why have foreskin if it's super sensitive?
Reading a book about it means nothing. Unless you have been circumcised in which case, I would take your word on it.
Good, thanks for the sites with OPINIONS, but, as a scientist, I will go with the scientific evidence and logic.
Sorry, but I don't accept your attempt to re-define NORMAL sensitivity as "super sensitive" Billions of people find normal sensitivity NORMAL! False logic based on ignorance is hardly convincing.
Reading a book AND using logic supersedes an opinion of the ignorant.
@Tandykane To say my logic is false and based on ignorance is pretty arrogant of you. What you have is science-based evidence where you proposed a hypothesis but didn't fulfill its prediction. While on the other hand I've assembled my facts from MY OWN experience and numerous medical doctors with knowledge that's the product of scientific research obviously. That's why it's evidence-based medicine.
Scientist or not, studying science is not the same as doing it as a profession..I rest my case.
When you try to present as fact your subjective opinion and opinions of others that are contradicted by the scientific evidence, logic, and reality, you can hardly call them facts or evidence.
Show me an anatomical study showing there are more nerves in the glans than in the foreskin, and that there are more specialized nerves, then you have a rational argument, but merely claiming your have opinions claiming this cannot be considered a fact. Seeing is believing.
@Tandykane The lower part of the head of your penis, the glans, is a sensitive part of your penis - usually the most sensitive part. When you’re born, the head of your penis is covered and protected by the foreskin.
Now I'm not saying foreskin isn't sensitive, no, I'm saying since the foreskin is covering the glans and at the same time kinda 'rubbing' it making it feel like it is more sensitive part.
I would present you some evidence but due to the youtube regulations, I can't post a link
@Tandykane You can check my facts on any site you want. Foreskin has 5 sensitive parts of your penis that are considered very sensitive, but the glans is the one that's the most...
For god's sake READ the Taylor ANATOMICAL study--the glans has relatively few nerves--and mostly no specialized ones. Now the Taylor study is the only anatomical study of the foreskin that I know exists..try to debunk it.
Try posting the title of the study...I can do a search.
Beautiful? Not to the 80% of the people in the world..to them it is scarred, ugly, dried out and frankly sad..only Jews, Muslims and some stupid Americans try this pathetic excuse.
And it IS damaged:
Fine-touch pressure thresholds in the adult penis Morris L. Sorrells, James L. Snyder, Mark D. Reiss 2 0 07 BJU INTERNATIONAL 2007
@Tandykane Studies in recent years have shown that the percentage of HIV and sexually transmitted diseases are lower in circumcised males. This is due to the fact that the foreskin causes an environment conducive to germs if germs are introduced.
So, you have some questionable studies with some unproven speculative mechanism, and then you have the REAL world stating the complete opposite, so which should rational people believe--crappy studies or their lying eyes?
Most medical studies are worthless..
Why Most Published Research Findings Are False John P. A. Ioannidis
An Epidemic of False Claims--Competition and conflicts of interest distort too many medical findings By John P. A. Ioannidis
@GuitarMonkey91 O.E.M. stands for "Original Equipment Manufacturer" - a term used in automotive and appliance venues to identify authentic parts from modified, fake or counterfeit parts.
@horselips i am thankful that you are proud!I am torn on circumcision. I have a son coming soonand I need to know if you have ever had any health problems directly related to not being circumcised?
All of the valid evidence shows that if the boy's penis is left alone and not retracted, the chances of any problem occurring is very, very small. And any problem that does occur will be minor, and can be easily treated medically.
And the bonus is he will have a fully functioning penis.
@martialpetty : None what so ever. There is no health problems for not being genitally mutilated.
Dont ever let anybody circumcise anybody. Genital mutilation is sick, perverse, barbaric, horrible and disgusting superstitious ritual that should be outlawed.
Thank goodness I live in a civilised country where these barbaric cults never had any power.
@aaqaaqaaqaaqaaqaaqaa You realize that 82% of the worlds population is intact, and that the US is the only industrialized country to perform routine non-medical circumcisions, right?
@DieWalrossen Boy there are loads of benefits, it's only in late modern history that this anti-circumcision propaganda started, mostly due to the catholic church hating it (even though the 2 men they worship the most were circumcised, Abraham and Jesus), in history, only noble men in the Aztec empire were circumcised because they believed it to be fresh and much cleaner, priests in ancient Egypt were always circumcised as were spiritual men of the Sumerian empire, who considered it a blessing
Please provide a single PROVEN benefits for circumcision. An attempt to revise history can hardly be considered more than folklore. And superstitious nonsense hardly justifies it .
They're so brave! And I think it loks so beautiful when its circumcised.
CaraCoolLove 1 week ago
@CaraCoolLove
Yes, scars, and a dried-up, leathery, partial-functioning parody of a penis is so beautiful..
Brave? sound more like stupid to me.
Tandykane 6 days ago
@CaraCoolLove You must be from a pretty shitty nation.
SteelCityDucati 5 days ago
worth it
doctorseaweed2 2 months ago
@doctorseaweed2
Really? and what rational and objective standards did you use to reach this conclusion?
Tandykane 2 months ago
@Tandykane Listen grandpa, get a life. Go fight circumcision in the real world if your so against it. Trolling youtube videos will get you nowhere.
doctorseaweed2 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@doctorseaweed2
And what makes you think that I do not do so in real life?
And with the rates of non-religious circumcision dropping as fast as it is, what makes you assume that I am not having any effect?
AGAIN, what rational and objective standards did you use to reach this conclusion?
Tandykane 2 months ago
I got circumcised when I was 11, it was to give me the right of passage to be a man.
shiptech2k9 2 months ago
@shiptech2k9 rite*
shiptech2k9 2 months ago
@shiptech2k9
So, chopping off the most sensitive part of your penis makes you a man? Hate to tell you, but if having a penis makes you a man, then having less of a penis makes you less of a man...and one who will never have a normal sex live that nature intended you to have.
Tandykane 2 months ago
@Tandykane It just removes the foreskin, and its supposed to be the pain and the fact that your penis is now "that" makes you a man. Like I said its just the foreskin, 30% of Americans have been circumcised and it`s not really that bad without foreskin, once your erect it`s the same thing. But I see your point, but it wasn't my decision either, it was my family`s but I don`t mind it either way.
shiptech2k9 2 months ago
@shiptech2k9
What a barabairuic notion, that enduring UNNECESSARY pain imakes on a man--this absolute nonsense should have died out thousands of years ago.
Just a foreskin--your ignorance is showing..
BRITISH JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, Volume 77, Pages 291-295,February 1996.
The prepuce: Specialized mucosa of the penis and its loss to circumcision
Not that bad?
Fine-touch pressure thresholds in the adult penis Morris L. Sorrells, James L. Snyder, Mark D. Reiss 2 0 07 BJU INTERNATIONAL 2007
Tandykane 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@Tandykane It just removes the foreskin, and its supposed to be the pain and the fact that your penis is now "that" makes you a man. Like I said its just the foreskin, 30% of Americans have been circumcised and it`s not really that bad without foreskin, once your erect it`s the same thing. But I see your point, but it wasn't my decision either, it was my family`s but I don`t mind it either way.
shiptech2k9 2 months ago
@RoughRiderAlex yea it does make your penis hard.
in fact, it makes it so hard you'll barely feel anything while having sex! :D
OneDollarMercenary 3 months ago
@RoughRiderAlex
Wow, I can't believe someone is this sick and perverted --getting sexually aroused by genital mutilation. A lot of sick people out there.
Tandykane 3 months ago
@Tandykane GET A LIFE
doctorseaweed2 2 months ago
@doctorseaweed2
Get yourself educated.
Tandykane 2 months ago
@Tandykane Get yourself a life.
doctorseaweed2 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
If you are circumcised and not happy about it or if you are intact and want to do something to help stop unnecessary circumcision, please visit foregen.org
TURKANDPROUDOFIT87 3 months ago
Comment removed
TURKANDPROUDOFIT87 3 months ago
I wondering what are those Power things that put on the guy's face?
SovandyBoy 3 months ago
this is not safe... AFRICA IS BULLSHIT
BreakPics 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@BreakPics
This is harmful, and ALL cultures who do it in ANY way are BULLSHIT
Tandykane 3 months ago
this is inhumane (yea, i'm circumcised, but i was porn at l'hopital de paris, where it was safe.) here they could DIE, in horrid retched pain, and its done at an older age where you feel every last cut.
JacquesVontoui 3 months ago
@JacquesVontoui
Circumcision is never "SAFE". even in best conditions, infants die from circumcision.
Circumcision IS inhumane regardless of age or situations.
And it is a myth that adults feel more pain-- they do not need to have their penis ripped apart, get full anesthesia, and feel pain less acutely than do infants.
Tandykane 3 months ago
@Tandykane - You really are a perverted old troll, aren't you? Your whole pleasure is to troll circumcision videos on YouTube, posting the same shit, over and over. No medical practice is 100% safe, you fucking idiot- and no one claims otherwise. The risks are MINIMAL and ISOLATED in western countries, and if developed more here, would be the same. No one needs to "justify" anything to you,you fucking loser- get a life and do something meaningful with your shallow, uneventful life.
Alaska47Boy 3 months ago
@Alaska47Boy
So, since you cannot state what you find are acceptable consequences for an unnecessary practice, THIS name-calling is all you have to offer?
Sensation and sensitivity loss rate is 100%..
And pray tell, WHY is any risk from an unnecessary practice even considered rational?
Tandykane 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@Tandykane- Now sensitivity loss is 100%?! Bwa ha ha ha ha- what a complete fucking idiot you are. First you can't substantiate your LIE of 3/4 loss, then you changed it to this? You really are a knucklehead:) I have stated the reasons for why it's acceptable- Your opinion is STILL null and worthless: again: Since the practice has been justified by parents- under the law- and under the privacy and protection they have with thier physician: Why do they need to "justify" anything to you?
Alaska47Boy 3 months ago
Comment removed
ald2345 4 months ago 6
Comment removed
ald2345 4 months ago
I'm circumcised and happy :)
doctorseaweed2 4 months ago
@doctorseaweed2
You are happy that you are missing the majority of penile nerves and up to 3/4 of your sensations and sensitivity?
Interesting what makes some people happy.
Tandykane 4 months ago
@Tandykane Yes, because over 35% of the world is circumcised. It must be so bad.
doctorseaweed2 4 months ago
@doctorseaweed2
So, because some men are circumcised somehow leads you to claim there is somehow a loss of sensation and sensitivity?
I am sorry, but i do not follow this thinking process.
BTW, you might wish to think 20%.
A Preliminary Poll of Men Circumcised in Infancy or Childhood
T. Hammond, BJU International (83, Suppl. 1), p. 85-92, January, 1999 circumcised intact
Satisfied 38% 78%
Dissatisfied 20% 3%
Ambivalent 41% 17%
Tandykane 4 months ago
@Tandykane So you admit it. Thank you.
doctorseaweed2 4 months ago
@doctorseaweed2
LOL, I cannot follow your thinking process because it is not rational or logical. it is all rebuttal by assumption, and assumption that is illogical and a conclusion drawn from it also illogical
Tandykane 4 months ago
@Tandykane You just admited circumcision is good above. Thanks for agreeing with me.
doctorseaweed2 4 months ago
@doctorseaweed2
Sorry silly word games don't work here, I challenged your assertion that simply because you believe men are happy to be cut is not evidence that it is good--belief means nothing. What did you not understand about about the evidence?
Tandykane 4 months ago
@Tandykane So your not circumcised?
doctorseaweed2 4 months ago
@doctorseaweed2
How would my genitals, or yours, for that matter affect the facts and evidence?
The scientifically-credible evidence shows that non-therapeutic infant circumcision has nothing good about it..and plenty of harm and risks.
Tandykane 4 months ago
@Tandykane The goods out weigh the bad. And do you have your wisdom teeth removed?
doctorseaweed2 4 months ago
@doctorseaweed2
Sorry, buy since there is no PROVEN good, and a lot of PROVEN harm and risks, this is an incorrect assertion.
What do wisdom teeth have to do with circumcision?
Tandykane 4 months ago
@Tandykane People have there wisdom teeth removed for no reason at all. I fefused to have mine removed because they help chew food. But you really don't need a foreskin at all. And the only harmful thing about circumcision is the few minutes of pain it takes, but then you get a lifetime of benefits.
doctorseaweed2 4 months ago
@doctorseaweed2
And do infant's have their wisdom teeth forcefully removed?
Don't need a foreskin? They do if they don't want to lose the up to 3/4 of their sensitivity and sensation a circumcision removes.
No harm? not aware of all of the PROVEN risks and harm from circumcision?
Can you supply a SINGLE PROVEN benefits for circumcision-- the silly "lifetime of benefits" assertion notwithstanding?
Tandykane 4 months ago
@Tandykane It is true you lose sensitivity. But how is that a bad thing? You'll last longer in bed. Orgasms are the exact same whether your cut or not. And 3/4 of sensitivity is bullshit. You'll lose 1/8 sensitivitiy at most. And parents force there kids to get there wisdom teeth removed right when they start coming in, even if they are doing no harm. Benefits: less dirty, longer sex, looks better.
doctorseaweed2 4 months ago
@doctorseaweed2
Soory, but your assumption is wrong--the Scandinavians found that cut men suffer MORE often from PE..and the O'Hara study showed that KNOWING women do NOT appreciate prolonged sex with a cut penis..too rough, abrasive and irritating.
I asked for PROVEN benefits, not myths and superstitions--so, got any?
Loss:
Fine-touch pressure thresholds in the adult penis Morris L. Sorrells, James L. Snyder, Mark D. Reiss 2 0 07 BJU INTERNATIONAL 2007
Tandykane 4 months ago
@doctorseaweed2
"Benefits: less dirty, longer sex, looks better."
less dirty? even the pro-circ dismissed this myth decades ago..
Longer sex?--not true and not desired.
Looks better? only to the 20% that are Jewish, Muslim, or ignorant American women.
Any PROVEN benefits?
Tandykane 4 months ago
@Tandykane Well, 35% of the world is circumcised. You were wrong. Yes it is less dirty, that is a proven fact. And you said yourself you lose sesitivity, so that means longer sex. Looks better in my country, don't know about you though.
It is cleaner in multiple ways, smells less, last longer in bed, easier to put a condom on. I know most guys will clean under the foreskin. But they won't clean it when they are kids. It will never be cleaned for around 11 years.
doctorseaweed2 4 months ago
@doctorseaweed2
Nope, 20% check your stats--don't rely on OPINIONS.
Less dirty? ANY evidence for this myth--water, retract, rinse, replace--DONE!
LOL, before separation, a child SHOULD NOT be retracted to be cleaned--then do above!
Funny, how evidence just rolls off your back, and you keep repeating myths as if repetition will ever refute the evidence.
Do you even KNOW what PROOF or EVIDENCE are? If not, then you really have nothing of substance to bring to this discussion, do you?
Tandykane 4 months ago
@Tandykane No, it's 30%. Go to wikipedia and look up "Prevalence of circumcision". And I agree most guys will clean it. But I highly dought kids will clean under there foreskin when they shower, so it will get infected.
Please explain how circumcision is so bad if 30% of the world had it done?
doctorseaweed2 4 months ago
@doctorseaweed2
And you believe something posted on Wikipedia? Google this and use the numbers and figure it out for yourself..
Ten Countries with the Highest Population in the World
So, it is good because you doubt kids know how to clean themselves? My grandson is 4, and he knows how to do it--and DOES it! This is what you think of as evidence? Get infected? Evidence?
Sorry, but "rebuttal by assumptions" is also not evidence.
Tandykane 4 months ago
@Tandykane LOL, Your a grandpa? I can't beleive a grandpa was argueing with a kid over the internet. And why the fuck do you watch your grandson clean his dick? And it is probably higher then 30% now that I think about it. They only measure circumcisions done in hospitals, and a lot of circumcisions are donw out of the hospital. It is probably around 40%. It woule be higher but china has so many people that don't do it.
doctorseaweed2 4 months ago
@doctorseaweed2
When you think about it, perhaps you can do the math and show how it equals the >30% you believe?
Funny how men can create science, fly to the moon, and you think they are too stupid to clean themselves.
Do you have anything other than beliefs?
Tandykane 4 months ago
@Tandykane Well thanks for answering my questions from the last video. Sarcasm incase you are to stupid to tell. I'm not saying that men can't clean themselfs, i'm saying that kids won't. See ya grandpa!
doctorseaweed2 4 months ago
@doctorseaweed2
You are confusing common sense with sarcasm..it was merely meant to show how ridiculous your assertion is.
IF you are saying that kids won't clean themselves, where is your evidence to support this claim--or is this yet another myth you believe but cannot support with any evidence?
Tandykane 4 months ago
@Tandykane Well you would know I guess, you already watch you grandkid pull his foreskin back and clean his dick. But listen gramps, circumcision might of not been as big as when you were a kid, the 30's I'm guessing. But now it is a big part of life because it has no bad sideffects.
doctorseaweed2 4 months ago
@doctorseaweed2
No bad side effects? What about the PROVEN of the majority of penile nerves which results in a loss of up to 3/4 of the penile sensation and sensitivity, linking to erectile impairment, premature ejaculation, and dozens and dozens of other bad side effects.
But don't let the facts and evidence get in your way.
Tandykane 4 months ago
@Tandykane Where did you get 3/4 from, gramps? And as I already stated, you will last much longer in bed. And you said there were dozens more bad side effects, so give me atleast 24 more. What is erectile impairment exaclty? And I don't get you, you said it takes away nerves then you say premature ejaculation may happen. Premature ejaculation occurs when the penis gets to sensitive to fast.
doctorseaweed2 4 months ago
@doctorseaweed2
Again, your inability to understand in no way affects the evidence--and the evidence is that cut men suffer more often from PE-period.
Lost sensation:
BRITISH JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, Volume 77, Pages 291-295,February 1996.
BJU INTERNATIONAL, Volume 83, Supplement 1, Pages 79-84,January 1, 1999.
NOW, do you have any valid evidence of any benefits..
I feed you evidence, you dismiss, and never offer any of your own. I give you evidence, and you repeat myths.
Tandykane 4 months ago
@Tandykane Give me those links to those journal pages. And no wonder it if bias against circumcision, they are both from england. The reason I keep on repeating the same "myths" is because you keep on dodging the same questions.
doctorseaweed2 4 months ago
@doctorseaweed2
Sorry, but youtube does not allow posting of links--you should be able to google them.
WHO cares where they come from? OR are you now trying to claim that only AMERICAN studies are valid?
Now after you have read them, please refute them with valid evidence, and THEN perhaps YOU can START supplying something resembling facts and evidence--I am tired of spoon-feeding you and have you summarily dismissing them for no rational or logical reason.
Tandykane 4 months ago
@doctorseaweed2
C'mon, let's get real here for once..I have supplied you evidence debunking nearly every one of your myths, and for you to pretend otherwise by ignoring them or simply dismissing themis downright childish.
Tandykane 4 months ago
@doctorseaweed2
Now since you brought up the "bias" issues once again--let's look at AMERICAN bias-- the pro-circ Williamson study:
Journal of Sex Education and Therapy, Vol. 14, No. 2 (Fall/Winter 1988): pp. 8-12.
1. ALL of the women came from the part of the USA with the highest circ rates.
2. Eighty-nine percent of the sample had just their sons circumcised.
3. The overwhelming majority had never even SEEN a normal penis, let alone experienced one.
Your comments?
Tandykane 4 months ago
@Tandykane Thank you for dodging the same questions again. To get this out of the way, either give me a link to read those articles because I can't find them anywhere, or they don't exist.
1. What does "circ" mean?
2. What does that have to do with this?
3. Define a "normal penis"
Off topic, but I get the feeling you lied about being a grandpa.
doctorseaweed2 4 months ago
@doctorseaweed2
Circ means circumcision.
what does that have to do with what? I have no idea what this is supposed to men?
A normal penis is one that is defined by what every infant (outside of birth defects) & by the majority of people in the world--and that NORMAL is a complete one with an erogenous foreskin.
I could acre less what you believe since so far, none of your beliefs are supported by evidence and/or facts.
NOW, ON TOPIC--what is YOUR comment on American bias?
Tandykane 4 months ago
@doctorseaweed2
NOW, my questions you have dodged:
1. Do you have any PROVEN benefit for circumcision?
2. Can you debunk the losses, risks of circumcision?
3. Can you show non-therapeutic circumcisions are necessary?
4. Do the lack of any PROVEN benefits and the PROVEN risks of circucmison provide a RATIONAL justification for infant circumcision?
Let's see if YOU will answer MY questions.
Tandykane 4 months ago
@Tandykane First of all, answer MY QUESTIONS.
But i'll bite, i'll answer yours.
1. Easier to clean
2. There are experts in circumcision who never do it wrong, there is no hazards if you get it donw as a baby.
3. They are not nessacary, but that few minutes of pain has a life time of benefits.
4. I don't get that one... explain.
And if you dodge my questions one more time...
doctorseaweed2 4 months ago
@doctorseaweed2
1. Myth--until you provide EVIDENCE.
2. can't ignore the Sorrels and Taylor study. Sorry all surgery has inherent risks, and no risks if not done--childish assumption.
3. Until you provide actual evidence, another myth.
4. SIMPLE--there are NO PROVEN benefits, and lot's of PROVEN harm and risks..therefore NO rational justification for circumcision--in fact the opposite.
5 Spare me this childish nonsense about answers you have been given.
Your comment on AMERICAN bias?
Tandykane 4 months ago
@Tandykane It is easier to clean because there is less skin. Enough said. I never heard of that story. Thank you for dodgeing that question. Yes, over 30% of the world had it done, it must be so bad.
You are also ignoring the fact that it is a tradition
doctorseaweed2 4 months ago
@doctorseaweed2 Tradition justifies nothing. And how can you justify "easier to clean" in the modern day? We all have access to hot water and soap (the latter isn't even necessary). If you aren't washing your genitals at least a few times a week, there is something wrong. Are you trying to argue that circumcision is a substitute to proper hygiene? The fact that 30% of the world practices it doesn't justify it; you are merely appealing to common practice, a classic example of fallacious logic.
Mystoksor 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@Mystoksor I'm not talking to you, your not the grandpa.
doctorseaweed2 4 months ago
@doctorseaweed2
Easier? Wow, yes, one must spend days scrubbing and washing? :) Retract, rinse, retract (10 seconds)is so onerous,that it is better to chop off the most sensitive part of one's genitals?
To claim this "easier" is a sheer sign of stupidity.
BTW, you better check up on the "30% you claim with some real numbers and not just accept questionable OPINIONS.
Tandykane 4 months ago
@Tandykane Well you admitted it was easier finnaly :) Cleaning for 10 seconds won't get rid of all the germs and they will build up after awhile. Circumcision makes it 100% clean. And it is 30%, wikipedia says that.
doctorseaweed2 4 months ago
@doctorseaweed2
If you think 10 seconds is an onerous task, you are being silly! Cuteness is hardly a cogent argument.
Hmm, do you actually believes that any part of the body can be 100% germ-free?
Wikipedia is a reliable source of information? Give me a break!
Tandykane 4 months ago
@Tandykane Then why did you copy and paste all your "evidence" from wikipedia? And I never said cleaning for 10 seconds was a bad task you blind moron. I said it is so much easier to get dirty, even if you clean a lot. Don't change the topic next comment, gramps.
doctorseaweed2 4 months ago
@doctorseaweed2
Oh, Cmon, if you had actually bothered to check my cites, you will see that I cite the medical articles themselves.
And you have a very distorted sense of morality, advocating the mutilation of children for something as stupid as it taking 10 seconds to wash oneself.
Tandykane 3 months ago
@Tandykane I'm not retarded. You were linking me to a virus site. Look, circumcision has been going on for 1000's of years. And the only people who complain about it are not circumcised.
doctorseaweed2 3 months ago
@doctorseaweed2
Furthermore, you might wish to check this out:
A Preliminary Poll of Men Circumcised in Infancy or Childhood
T. Hammond, BJU International (83, Suppl. 1), p. 85-92, January, 1999 circumcised intact
Satisfied 38% 78%
Dissatisfied 20% 3%
Ambivalent 41% 17%
Tandykane 3 months ago
@Tandykane First of all, those "facts" are made up. I'm not THAT stupid. Most people are satisfied being circumcised.
doctorseaweed2 3 months ago
@doctorseaweed2
Yph, that's the modus operendi--just pretend that your ignorant beliefs and assumptions have more merit that a peer-reviewed medical study..deny what you dislike!
yes, you ARE STUPID--as shown by your abject ignorance and desperately choosing to remain that wat.
Tandykane 3 months ago
@Tandykane Atleast I have decent grammer. And how come you change the topic after every comment?
doctorseaweed2 3 months ago
Comment removed
ald2345 3 months ago
@ald2345 Damn it
doctorseaweed2 3 months ago
@doctorseaweed2
Why, because there are many aspects of circumcision that you never address and yet still need to be covered--and that you are too busy with ad hominem attacks to address.
When you say grammar, do you really mean spelling?
Tandykane 3 months ago
@Tandykane Well thank you for having decent grammer now.
doctorseaweed2 3 months ago
@doctorseaweed2
You are welcome, now can we discuss the problems with circumcision?
PROVEN harm : lost nerves, sensation and sensitivity
Common PROVEN risks; infection, meatal stenosis, meatal ulcers, bleeding, phimosis, concealed penis,skin bridges.......
Documented: partial or whole glans loss, penis loss, gastric rupture Apnea,denudation necrosis, septicemia,gangrene,urethral fistula,Ruptured bladder....... and DEATH!
Tandykane 3 months ago
@Tandykane Sourmath.com for proof
doctorseaweed2 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@doctorseaweed2
"Sourmath.com for proof"
Pathetic shit is your proof? Why is this not unexpected from you?
When you are done being too cute, perhaps you can provide valid evidence FOR circumcision.
Tandykane 3 months ago
@Tandykane
I linked you to a site with a virus? How does that compute when I merely cited a study with which you could do a SEARCH?
If Google led you to this site, let me know, and I will try to provide info for a different search.
No one complains? What rock do you love under?--all you need to do is visit circumcision forums to find that MANY DO complain.
Tandykane 3 months ago
@doctorseaweed2 I know its difficult, but this tandykane person should just be ignored. not because he's neccesarily wrong,but simply because he's a hater. I'm a cut man who has NEVER had any of the thousands of problems this zealot makes claims to.I AM against RIC (my son is not cut) .but making people try to feel like less when they are in fact not is just plain evil. my advice is to find someone less vitriolic to argue with. best of luck
reyjalapeno 2 months ago
@reyjalapeno
translation:, ignore those more educated then myself..ignore the evidence that intrudes on my fantasy of no harm done..
Tell us again how you are not missing the sensations and sensitivity removed by circumcision?
Can we see a greater example of denial?
Tandykane 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@doctorseaweed2
"Well you would know I guess, you already watch you grandkid pull his foreskin back and clean his dick." I would like to know just HOW you reached this conclusion when I said, that my grandson knows how to clean himself and does it? Into transference because YOU watch your sons wash their dicks? Assumptions sometimes reveal more than people intend to reveal.
Tandykane 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
"Circumcision removes the most sensitive part of a man's penis. The five most sensitive areas of the penis are on the foreskin. The transitional region from the external to the internal foreskin is the most sensitive region of the fully intact penis, and more sensitive than the most sensitive region of the circumcised penis.
-----------------------
Fine-Touch Pressure Thresholds In The Adult Penis
British Journal of Urology International,
2007, Vol. 99, No. 4, 864-869
Sorrells et al.
wdmm94 4 months ago
Q: Does being circumcised take away from your penis length?
diz354 4 months ago
@diz354
In a study investigating the adequacy of condom sizes, Richters, Gerofi, and Donovan noted that circumcised men had significantly shorter erect penises by a mean length of 8mm than genitally intact men (p<.05). The difference in erect penile size was attributed to insufficient skin to accomodate the erection.
Richters J, Gerofi J,Donovan B. Are condoms the right size(s)? A method for self-measurement of the erect penis. Venereology 1995;8:77-81
Tandykane 4 months ago
@lisambofoh where u from?
spamrate 5 months ago
some real fucked places out there...
misterman111222 5 months ago
LiKe my BF Maggs does a lot of anal and she says cut cock is better for anal cause uncut cock gets dirty after anal and doesn't taste good like cut cock.
If you don't like the taste of anal stick to cut cock. Uncut cock tastes like shit after anal.
SweetJaneofGoth 6 months ago
@SweetJaneofGoth
Who dreams up this stupid illogical crap anyway? Are people too stupid to know how to wash?
Tandykane 6 months ago
@Tandykane Well like, I have a gay friend and he says uncut is way better for anal. He says uncut cums out with more shit on it and is really tasty.
SweetJaneofGoth 6 months ago
@SweetJaneofGoth
Sigh!
Tandykane 6 months ago
Show me a baby that's born circumcised. Are you saying nature made a mistake?
becalmned 6 months ago 4
@becalmned
"Show me a baby that's born circumcised."
Right on! In the very rare cases of a baby born without a foreskin, this is classified as a birth DEFECT. Nothing more need be said.
Tandykane 6 months ago 5
@Tandykane Aposthia that is all. look up Aposthia.
trollh8r 6 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@trollh8r
"Aposthia that is all. look up Aposthia." I know--and it is classified as a birth defect, So?
Tandykane 6 months ago
@becalmned What's worse is, these people are saying God made a mistake... uh oh.
Omnislash2000 3 months ago
@Omnislash2000
Was it a mistake or deliberate? Some Jewish rabbis claim that the ONLY reason their god made and maintains the Universe is so there can be circumcisions.
Tandykane 3 months ago
Vai toma no cuh
darketoilefilante 6 months ago
@DragonAge2k americans are the dumbest people my friend, we are the smartest.
Zomg641 6 months ago
@PushEastward so hitler's theories fail, because they can beat anyone
elperretebueno 6 months ago
@PushEastward if the usa was enslaved by the jews, then according to hitler's own theories, it is becuase they were weak, and therefore deserved it.
elperretebueno 6 months ago
Sex with a cut dick must be a suffering rather than pleasure
Komnenit 6 months ago
@Komnenit
According to the O'Hara study, the majority of women who have had normal and cut sex overwhelmingly (87%) prefer the normal kind--many for exactly the reason you suggest.
Tandykane 6 months ago
Nothing wrong with it....
I masturbate like 3 times a day.
shan9usfc 6 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
smh...so many ignorant closed minded people on youtube. Hiding behind a computer talking shit...COBARDES!
kingelkape 6 months ago
I want a circumcision! I feel as though I have a tube sock on my dick.
miles2057 6 months ago
@miles2057
Nothing is stopping you from being an idiot--as an adult, it is your right...go for it!
Tandykane 6 months ago
@Tandykane Why would I be an idiot for getting a circumcision now as an adult? What's wrong with circumcised penises?
miles2057 6 months ago
@miles2057
Because objective SCIENTIFIC evidence shows that circumcised men suffer a loss of up to 3/4 of their penile sensation and sensitivity with no PROVEN benefit.
Tandykane 6 months ago
@miles2057, if you feel that you "have a tube sock" on your dick, then you may have a defective foreskin. The foreskin normally rolls back from the glans on erection or with "in-out" motion. In the event that you do have a problem foreskin, there may be far better, less invasive, ways to correct it than by circumcision. Foreskin is highly innervated, sexually functional tissue.
psandbergnz 6 months ago
It's not a ritual, it's torture.
breanntheartist1989 7 months ago
This is obscene. There is no reason to respect this form of medically dangerous stone-age insanity.
EgoNamahaNemoRex 7 months ago
knife!
devilvoyaa 7 months ago
I just got circumcised when I was born...
mahmoud1995 7 months ago
OMG SCARY.............................
BC3602bloopers 7 months ago
Comment removed
PsychoticButcher 7 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Uncut men and boys enjoy bareback anal sex far more than men whose cocks have been mutilated by Medical Doctors/Penis-Butchers.
As a decorated Gay Police Officer, I support a NATIONWIDE BAN on male genital mutilation and fine enforcement of up to $1000 or One Year Imprisonment for criminal offenders.
If you choose NOT to follow the law and choose to circumcise your son, I can promise this, you will go to prison for child abuse and your baby will be taken into custody by Child Protective Services
DeptOfLawEnforcement 7 months ago
@Tandykane Just use google... every medical site regarding Circumcision will tell you that the head is more sensitive, just use your common sense, how can foreskin protect the glans if it's more sensitive?
Why have foreskin if it's super sensitive?
Reading a book about it means nothing. Unless you have been circumcised in which case, I would take your word on it.
bobo225884 7 months ago
@bobo225884
Good, thanks for the sites with OPINIONS, but, as a scientist, I will go with the scientific evidence and logic.
Sorry, but I don't accept your attempt to re-define NORMAL sensitivity as "super sensitive" Billions of people find normal sensitivity NORMAL! False logic based on ignorance is hardly convincing.
Reading a book AND using logic supersedes an opinion of the ignorant.
Tandykane 7 months ago
@Tandykane To say my logic is false and based on ignorance is pretty arrogant of you. What you have is science-based evidence where you proposed a hypothesis but didn't fulfill its prediction. While on the other hand I've assembled my facts from MY OWN experience and numerous medical doctors with knowledge that's the product of scientific research obviously. That's why it's evidence-based medicine.
Scientist or not, studying science is not the same as doing it as a profession..I rest my case.
bobo225884 7 months ago
@bobo225884
When you try to present as fact your subjective opinion and opinions of others that are contradicted by the scientific evidence, logic, and reality, you can hardly call them facts or evidence.
Show me an anatomical study showing there are more nerves in the glans than in the foreskin, and that there are more specialized nerves, then you have a rational argument, but merely claiming your have opinions claiming this cannot be considered a fact. Seeing is believing.
Tandykane 7 months ago
@Tandykane The lower part of the head of your penis, the glans, is a sensitive part of your penis - usually the most sensitive part. When you’re born, the head of your penis is covered and protected by the foreskin.
Now I'm not saying foreskin isn't sensitive, no, I'm saying since the foreskin is covering the glans and at the same time kinda 'rubbing' it making it feel like it is more sensitive part.
I would present you some evidence but due to the youtube regulations, I can't post a link
bobo225884 7 months ago
a circumcised penis is a damaged penis?
olumorador 7 months ago
@olumorador
Of course a circumcised penis is a damaged penis--it is missing the most sensitive part!
Tandykane 7 months ago
@Tandykane correction, it's missing a skin around the most sensitive part
bobo225884 7 months ago
@bobo225884
WRONG! The foreskin IS the most sensitive part--do your research..
BRITISH JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, Volume 77, Pages 291-295,February 1996.
The prepuce: Specialized mucosa of the penis and its loss to circumcision
by J.R. Taylor, A.P. Lockwood and A.J. Taylor
Fine-touch pressure thresholds in the adult penis Morris L. Sorrells, James L. Snyder, Mark D. Reiss 2 0 07 BJU INTERNATIONAL 2007
I'll let you try to reconcile the evidence with your conceptions.
Tandykane 7 months ago
@Tandykane You can check my facts on any site you want. Foreskin has 5 sensitive parts of your penis that are considered very sensitive, but the glans is the one that's the most...
bobo225884 7 months ago
@bobo225884
For god's sake READ the Taylor ANATOMICAL study--the glans has relatively few nerves--and mostly no specialized ones. Now the Taylor study is the only anatomical study of the foreskin that I know exists..try to debunk it.
Try posting the title of the study...I can do a search.
Tandykane 7 months ago
don;t have feeling during sex .
aleksandar27123 7 months ago
God, that was a quick snip! No stitches?
rgbmode 7 months ago
i liked my circumcision
alinouman222 7 months ago
@alinouman222
Hope you enjoy your damaged penis as much as you enjoyed having it damaged.
Tandykane 7 months ago
@Tandykane my penis is not damaged it looks beautiful.
alinouman222 7 months ago
@alinouman222
Beautiful? Not to the 80% of the people in the world..to them it is scarred, ugly, dried out and frankly sad..only Jews, Muslims and some stupid Americans try this pathetic excuse.
And it IS damaged:
Fine-touch pressure thresholds in the adult penis Morris L. Sorrells, James L. Snyder, Mark D. Reiss 2 0 07 BJU INTERNATIONAL 2007
Tandykane 7 months ago
@Tandykane i m happy with it.. You happy with your. I will never change my point of view and you also,dont know. It has many advantages. ok bye
alinouman222 7 months ago
@alinouman222
Can you provide me with a single proven and rational advantage?
Tandykane 7 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@Tandykane Can you provide me with a single proven and rational disadvantage? There is no disadvantage of it.
alinouman222 7 months ago
@Tandykane Studies in recent years have shown that the percentage of HIV and sexually transmitted diseases are lower in circumcised males. This is due to the fact that the foreskin causes an environment conducive to germs if germs are introduced.
redred11212 7 months ago
@redred11212
So, you have some questionable studies with some unproven speculative mechanism, and then you have the REAL world stating the complete opposite, so which should rational people believe--crappy studies or their lying eyes?
Most medical studies are worthless..
Why Most Published Research Findings Are False John P. A. Ioannidis
An Epidemic of False Claims--Competition and conflicts of interest distort too many medical findings By John P. A. Ioannidis
Tandykane 7 months ago
rituals with blood and pain summons demons, thats why the forskins are burried, but it wont help, demons keep the rituals bisy
z2ara 8 months ago
omg this is just ridiculous! tradition is no excuse to do such outrageous things like this!
shazpie 8 months ago
I am 100% Anatomically Correct with all O.E.M. parts intact. Thanks Mom and Dad! Anybody coming for my foreskin better be bulletproof.
horselips 8 months ago 30
@horselips OEM? can some1 explain?
GuitarMonkey91 6 months ago
@GuitarMonkey91 O.E.M. stands for "Original Equipment Manufacturer" - a term used in automotive and appliance venues to identify authentic parts from modified, fake or counterfeit parts.
horselips 6 months ago
@horselips "bulletproof" lmao xD
Sadowski40 5 months ago
@horselips i am thankful that you are proud!I am torn on circumcision. I have a son coming soonand I need to know if you have ever had any health problems directly related to not being circumcised?
martialpetty 4 months ago
@martialpetty
All of the valid evidence shows that if the boy's penis is left alone and not retracted, the chances of any problem occurring is very, very small. And any problem that does occur will be minor, and can be easily treated medically.
And the bonus is he will have a fully functioning penis.
Tandykane 4 months ago
@martialpetty : None what so ever. There is no health problems for not being genitally mutilated.
Dont ever let anybody circumcise anybody. Genital mutilation is sick, perverse, barbaric, horrible and disgusting superstitious ritual that should be outlawed.
Thank goodness I live in a civilised country where these barbaric cults never had any power.
bary1234 4 months ago
gee, I don't know why slave traders in the 1500's thought they were animals.
aaqaaqaaqaaqaaqaaqaa 8 months ago 13
@aaqaaqaaqaaqaaqaaqaa You realize that 82% of the worlds population is intact, and that the US is the only industrialized country to perform routine non-medical circumcisions, right?
smesyna 6 months ago
@aaqaaqaaqaaqaaqaaqaa Oh and this is a consenting adult, not a helpless baby.
smesyna 6 months ago
@aaqaaqaaqaaqaaqaaqaa RACIST!!!!!!! _I_ ;)
chukwuemeka23456 6 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@aaqaaqaaqaaqaaqaaqaa RACIST!!!!!!! _I_ ;)
chukwuemeka23456 6 months ago
@aaqaaqaaqaaqaaqaaqaa What a cunty thing to say.
scientific1982 5 months ago
@scientific1982: Just calling it as I see it. Different but equal....NOT!
aaqaaqaaqaaqaaqaaqaa 5 months ago
@aaqaaqaaqaaqaaqaaqaa Who are we to judge? We inflict the same savagery on helpless infants.
Mystoksor 5 months ago
Ah, so you honor your god by changing how he made you.
And btw, I wouldn't want to meet a god that wants you to cut off a piece of your penis.
sohigh10 8 months ago
MARGERIN FRUM DA SUPAMARKET! LOLOLROFLZ. this is the dumbest thing i've ever seen. the stupidity is just mind numbing
sureiguess1 8 months ago
the only benefit is not having to shake when you pee and even then you still need to shake a little.
DieWalrossen 8 months ago
@DieWalrossen Boy there are loads of benefits, it's only in late modern history that this anti-circumcision propaganda started, mostly due to the catholic church hating it (even though the 2 men they worship the most were circumcised, Abraham and Jesus), in history, only noble men in the Aztec empire were circumcised because they believed it to be fresh and much cleaner, priests in ancient Egypt were always circumcised as were spiritual men of the Sumerian empire, who considered it a blessing
MrDiem2 8 months ago
@MrDiem2 so it's a religious thing? oh well than that just gives more reason to ban it.
DieWalrossen 8 months ago
@MrDiem2
Please provide a single PROVEN benefits for circumcision. An attempt to revise history can hardly be considered more than folklore. And superstitious nonsense hardly justifies it .
Tandykane 8 months ago