today in school our physics teacher told us about nuclear fusion with deuterium and tritinium or something like that and that they need to be a plasma to work
so i decided i want to get some and put it in a jar in a microwave and run!
Nature loves nuclear fusion from water: Nuclear fission from nuranium is toxic to all life. Plants take in CO2 to grow, but nuclear power's stooges made up GW
JT, you keep using the word "fusion." I do not think it means what you think it means.
Fusion: "a thermonuclear reaction in which nuclei of light atoms join to form nuclei of heavier atoms, as the combination of deuterium atoms to form helium atoms."
What cockeyed definition of "Fusion" is JT using?
Come on, give me ONE article from a reliable source. Hell, give me something from a dodgy source if that's all you can muster. Give me SOMETHING other than "A teacher told me" or "Well it's in nature." Show me SOME sign SOMEONE once tested that claim and got a positive result.
Microwave ovens are Fresnel cages. THey come plaster with radaition warnings, but the onyl radaition that can pass a Fresnbel cage is gamam radaition. So micorwave ov en turn water into hE, O, gamma waves and heat. This is my M.eng area.
This can be seen as an example of a "meaningless statement" fallacy. JT talks about "Fresnel cages" and microwave radiation shielding as if it had any bearing upon his claim that "The deep sea does nuclear fusion at 3 C, producing He and O." He also confuses a microwave's production of non ionizing electromagnetic radiation with nuclear fusion. Finally, he relies upon the "Proof by assertion" fallacy, repeating claims but STILL providing no sources.
I don't get it is it some kind of trick or what?
blahdob 2 years ago
No: But it means you can do loads of stuff with a microwave.
JonThm 2 years ago
today in school our physics teacher told us about nuclear fusion with deuterium and tritinium or something like that and that they need to be a plasma to work
so i decided i want to get some and put it in a jar in a microwave and run!
blahdob 2 years ago
It is simpler than that: NASA showed that boilnig regular water does nuclear fusion, at the point of boiling. Youre teachers need to learn stuff!
JonThm 2 years ago
ok, i'm gonna go now, i'm getting scared...
i guess you really like nuclear fusion huh?
blahdob 2 years ago
Nature loves nuclear fusion from water: Nuclear fission from nuranium is toxic to all life. Plants take in CO2 to grow, but nuclear power's stooges made up GW
JonThm 2 years ago
JT, you keep using the word "fusion." I do not think it means what you think it means.
Fusion: "a thermonuclear reaction in which nuclei of light atoms join to form nuclei of heavier atoms, as the combination of deuterium atoms to form helium atoms."
What cockeyed definition of "Fusion" is JT using?
flakingnapstich 2 years ago
The deep sea does nuclear fusion at 3 C, producing He and O. A microwave oven does NF at about 200 C.
JonThm 2 years ago
Riiiight. Sure.
And your source for that claim is...?
Come on, give me ONE article from a reliable source. Hell, give me something from a dodgy source if that's all you can muster. Give me SOMETHING other than "A teacher told me" or "Well it's in nature." Show me SOME sign SOMEONE once tested that claim and got a positive result.
flakingnapstich 2 years ago
Microwave ovens are Fresnel cages. THey come plaster with radaition warnings, but the onyl radaition that can pass a Fresnbel cage is gamam radaition. So micorwave ov en turn water into hE, O, gamma waves and heat. This is my M.eng area.
JonThm 2 years ago
This can be seen as an example of a "meaningless statement" fallacy. JT talks about "Fresnel cages" and microwave radiation shielding as if it had any bearing upon his claim that "The deep sea does nuclear fusion at 3 C, producing He and O." He also confuses a microwave's production of non ionizing electromagnetic radiation with nuclear fusion. Finally, he relies upon the "Proof by assertion" fallacy, repeating claims but STILL providing no sources.
flakingnapstich 2 years ago