Added: 1 year ago
From: tpmtv
Views: 87,257
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (799)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • Comment removed

  • weiner was a reasonable voice in congress too. imo, he shouldnt have been dismissed but oh well. you cant fuck up than lie about it, unless your president.

  • @RadarGuidedVermin you probably voted for a boy-fucker that ran a political platform on family values. o'reilly is a elite-driven constructivist with the power to reach and misinform millions of viewers...

  • Comment removed

  • @RadarGuidedVermin except he didnt do that you dipshit. he sent photos to adult females, not young girls. and your republican friends who repeadetly do things that benefit corporations at the cost of the middle class shows that your party is truly nothing more than a party for the rich. which is a hell of a lot worse than some guy showing his cock to adult women who consented

  • Comment removed

  • @RadarGuidedVermin Wrong, and wrong. Isnt your party the one who always finds themselves having gay sex, or fucking some male hooker some where? Oh yeah, thats right, they are.

  • Comment removed

  • @RadarGuidedVermin - Not UNsolicited. Not YOUNG girls. You make it sound Pedo, and you did it for effect. Just quit. The guy made errors in judgement. And yes, decided to lie. A cad of a thing to do. But the guy is spot on dead right on his approach to the Radical Right of this country and their cronies on Fix News. I love this guys honesty and the fact he doesn't whimper out to these hacks on Fix.

  • Comment removed

  • @RadarGuidedVermin - No, NOT a pic of junk to "young girls". She was an adult and was doing the same teasing to him as he was to her. Flirting. YES, he went too far. YES, lying that badly was wrong. Idiot. The "young girl" was a facebook "friending" you dork. The "young girl" was on his open page and commented about him. He "friended" back, you utter moron. NOBODY did or said ANYthing innapropriate to that 17 y.o. and you know it. The guy was ousted for lying so much about a few transgression

  • Comment removed

  • Comment removed

  • "I love you buddy, you've gotta stop making stuff up" LOL 0:54

  • This is what is wrong in washington. EnEver mind Obama care good or bad or what ever. This Wiener could not answer a question ho fines you if its not the irs. Whatis the agency? I mean s it that hard to answer

  • @mark96701

    you make absolutely no sense.

  • @brpowerful America owes Andrew Breitbart a debt of gratitude for taking out the trash.

  • Comment removed

  • 0:03 - Pass the popcorn

  • The fact is you will be penalized on your taxes if you do not have mandatory insurance coverage, and if you don't pay your taxes you will loose your assets/end up in jail.

  • Anthony always thought he was smarter than anybody he berated and interrupted ...

  • 0:25 when he was saying he had a "bird bird in here", he was referring to his weiner right?

  • @Kritickos he said he has a "Big burden"

  • @sfoster1985 a very big burden...

  • @sfoster1985 congratulations on not getting the joke. moron.

  • @suckitparisfrance if it was a joke, it wasn't very funny--not even clever really. Just trying to help clarify since there are clearly so many confused, hostile and angry people here--as evidenced by you.

  • 0:41, O'Reailly hails Hitler.

  • @2b3the1 LOLOLOLOL that made me laugh XD

  • @blr2k Hahahahaha. Do you think if the government legalized weed that they wouldn't control it?

    Specific dealers such as tobacco stores and liquor stores.

    It would still be illegal to grow cannabis.

    Furthermore, even with that, cannabis is capable of replacing cosmetic oil companies, lumber companies, and a few more.

    It's just far cheaper. And is a simple process. It would destroy some old jobs, but would create new ones.

    And it wouldn't exactly destroy all old jobs either.

  • @Microtardz It's not that they wouldn't want to control the distribution, it's that they COULDN'T. This is the same government which can't close the southern border, can't stop printing money (causing inflation) and..well, you get the idea. My family has over 40 acres of land. How would the government know if I planted a weed throughout a .5 acre portion of it? They wouldn't! That's why they couldn't tax the distribution. Also, the tobacco & liquor comparison isn't a good one...

  • @blr2k Assuming that everyone has that amount of land?

    The government is, the government. If you don't think they could compete with local weed dealers and seed sellers vs. a government that could buy from Amsterdam pretty fucking cheap, then something's messed up.

    Although, I do have to state that if they competed, in order to pay off the debt and have universal healthcare.

    The war budget would have to be reduced by about 800Billion a year.

  • Still wins.

  • "I love u buddy but u gotta stop making stuff up" he owned him like his bitch.

  • Does this place The Weiner in the same club as Bill Blithe III Clinton, since The Rodmanless Hillary and the unly Hotdog himself have claimed the whole thing was the conspiracy work of the Right-wing. The truth is Weiner and the Clintons are scumbag liars!

  • Bill O'Reilly is such a slimy cocksucker.

  • All you see is a pronounced arrogance....weiner,pelosi,ran­gel,clinton,sunstein,etc. Arrogance is NOT a quality you want in your leaders. But it makes perfect sense that socialists should be arrogant in nature because in reality, socialism is not about helping people...its about stripping a population of its power by way of taking its private wealth. Then you have a population dependent on government and its programs to survive. Anyone who wants that is either a king or an IDIOT.

  • Dont be upset about the fact that this creepy pervert "lied to the nation" Thats to be expected. The thing to take away from this is that it is a clear example of the "mindset" that these progressive socialists have. "I can do whatever the fuck I want, because Im a congressman...or Im FORMER speaker of the house (pelosi)...so I can get myself and all my friends exempted from the laws that I myself advocate...watch msnbc and dont know what im talking about regarding pelosi...do actual research

  • seriously who would hack weiner??

  • He is a known lier so I think weiner is talking out his ass. He didn't actually say anything.

  • @TheEodtch O'Reilly did actually make shit up.

    Weiner lied on something that would kill his political life. And it shouldn't kill his political life.

    It was a consensual transaction between two people over Twitter and e-mail.

    Furthermore, it's something that happens extremely often, the only reason Weiner was called out on it is because of his last name being Weiner.

    It makes people feel he's an easier target.

    Either way, the man isn't wrong.

  • @Microtardz Well no Bill didn't make things up. This sounds like the whole character doesn't matter. If he will straight out lie infront of the entire country. Send half naked pictures to a young girl when he married it tells a lot about who a person is. Character does matter. I don't care if he is the smartest man on earth he is of low moral character and undeserving power in this counrty.

  • @TheEodtch Bill did, make things up lol. This is Bill O'Reilly we're talking about, the guy who gets mentally checkmated every other hour.

    As for Weiners character.

    I have to say, I wouldn't doubt what the Vast majority of presidents haven't cheated on their wives.

    Furthermore, what he was doing is only considered porn until it comes out he has had physical contact.

    So, it's not that bad yet.

  • @Microtardz No he didn't. You can say it as much as you like but NO! As for your "well everyone has cheated" argument really is that what you come with? All the other lemmings jumped so I did also. Way to fight the good fight. Sounds like a liberal idea. Furthermore, it wasn't porn at all from what I have seen. It is that bad if you have any moral compass at all. I wouldn't let him babysit my young daughter that is for sure.

  • @TheEodtch From what i've seen, The entire thing was over the internet. I have yet to see any evidence come up with physical contact.

    And furthermore, i've yet to see one where the girl was even under 20. Let alone 18.

    As for "well everyone cheated" I was actually stating some of the finest presidents we've had have been perverts.

    I highly doubt sexual activity causes a person to be incapable of leading a nation properly.

  • @Microtardz The worst part was he lied to the country, I really don't care if he puts a pic of him in his panties up on a bilboard in time square. He is a liar and a cheat. It's called character. Don't get wrapped up about the pic itself. OMG you only think about the sex part of it. It's his character and the ease that he lied. He was almost insulting the press when they asked him about it. IT ISNT ABOUT THE SEX OK SO YOU CAN STOP PUSHING THAT POINT.

  • @TheEodtch stop focusing on wieners cock lies.

  • @globalchaos1984 Yeah I am the one focusing on his cock.. You clearly can't read. Weimer just looks like a creepy pedofile. But then I am sure your kids get buggerd by you as well. Hopefully you don't have any. globalchaos... what a name lmao. you sound like such a cool dude..

  • @TheEodtch Stop telling me about Wiener's cock.

  • @globalchaos1984 You are truely a fool. YOu sad little person. I really feel sorry for you.

  • @TheEodtch For the last time I do not want to know the number of veins in Wiener's cock. Stop talking about it.

  • @globalchaos1984 You are the stupidest human beng I have ever talked to. I feel dumber for have this conversation. dont right back.

  • @TheEodtch Oh I will "right" back! Its not my fault you love Wiener's fat cock. Blame your childhood.

  • @globalchaos1984 Wow you must have been on the debate team in school. Your quick wit must come in handy. Can you make any point at all or do you just make nonsensical statements?

  • @TheEodtch The point that you have to deal with is your fascination with wieners cock. You need some therapy.

  • @globalchaos1984 Oh little boy you will grow up some day. Come out of your parents basement, and the closet. It's ok now a day.

  • @TheEodtch You shouldn't be talking to little boys over the internet.

  • @globalchaos1984 I know especially ones as stupid as you.

  • @TheEodtch He lied, he should be held accountable for that lie, and he should have to apologize to the public.

    Which, he's already done.

    He's human, he made mistake, he didn't own up to it at first. That was another mistake.

    He's owning up to it now.

    And his policies are pretty good.

    So, I see no reason to hold it completely against his character.

    People are capable of mistakes.

  • @Microtardz The people will hold him accountable. His policies are pretty horrible he beleives in the health care plan after all. Lieing to people who you are supposed to represent is not a mistake it is intintional.

    You don't hold it against his character because your values are probably pretty low.

  • @TheEodtch I don't hold it against him he's human.

    His policies aren't horrible, the Health Care bill wasn't perfect, but it was at least an attempt.

    As a wise man once said, Running a government often takes a lot of trial and error, sometime we get it right, some times not, if we do something that was not right, we should admit it bluntly, and try something else.

    But above all, try something.

  • @Microtardz Really just try something? Anything as long as we try something? I hope you aren't going with that.

    If you know something is wrong before you even start then hmm probably shouldn't try it.

  • @TheEodtch The issue is now, you're arguing the bill was completely wrong.

    Is it not revisable? Is it not fallible?

    If we worry constantly about right and wrong and never actually try something, then we'll never figure out what works.

  • @Microtardz If we don't worry about right and wrong we are completly lost. Yes the bill is completly unconstitutional. You can not force people to enroll in gov. health care. It is not flaud it is trash from head to toe. They could change the constitution I guess.

  • @TheEodtch Actually, it forces businesses to enroll in gov. healthcare otherwise they still have to pay taxes on it regardless, and possibly a fine.

    The argument was that if a company wanted to not take the government healthcare that they could pay the fine, and for larger companies, the fine would be cheaper than the healthcare.

    However, we're already paying taxes every day for healthcare and War anyway.

    So I don't really see a difference.

  • @Microtardz You are proving my point that it is unconstitutional. Healthcare should not be a gov. issue. Healthcare isn't a right.

    We are already paying taxes so why not pay more isn't to my liking.

  • @TheEodtch Actually, a lot of things are currently unconstitutional.

    And as far as paying more taxes.

    My actual argument for universal healthcare is cut the annual 1.35 trillion dollar war spending IN HALF!

    Healthcare should be a government issue. Just a Medicare which lowered the Old Person poverty rate from 30% to 10%.

    Furthermore, Bill said they'd have to disclose personal patient information, in reality.

    They don't.

  • @Microtardz We do need to cut military spending and give it back to the people not make me pay for someone elses health. I do not want to pay for anyones bad choices. And actually with as big as the health care would be personal info would be disclosed. It already is why would it change?

  • @TheEodtch Bro, look at the facts. You already pay taxes on healthcare as is.

    You have to buy your own personalized healthcare, and you still have to do a payment at the doctors office in order to be seen.

    Which is better? Paying 1 time, that would probably be cheaper.

    Or paying 4-5?

    Personal info is limited to certain things, heart problems, liver problems etc etc.

    I don't find that extremely invasive into my private life.

  • @Microtardz Yes but it is still personal things so he wasn't lieing. If you gave government control of something as monsterous as health care OMG watch out. They can't even run the post office, or schools. The government isn't good at running anything. Even there money collection agency can't do it right.

    So no I do not want to pay for you or anyone else. Nothing personal.

  • @TheEodtch Really? Denmark, Sweden, Norway.

    Need I continue?

    I agree, our government tends to make a lot of mistakes when running shit.

    No child left behind was a complete failure, reducing money to schools that have low test scores. That's idiotic.

    A school with low test scores would only get lower test scores if funding was removed.

    But it was an attempt none-the less.

  • @Microtardz Not sure what Denmark, Sweeden or Norway have to do with it.

    I do not want government to make attempts that can be shown not to work just for to say we made an attempt. Funding to schools needs to be cut WAY back. Go to your local school see how many vice principals and managers and red tape this and that. Schools are blooooooted with money. Since we are going for attempt for the sake of attempt lets do school vouchers and test who can run schools best.

  • @TheEodtch I agree larger public schools are bloated with money and they waste the money extremely often.

    But smaller schools don't have that luxury.

    Smaller schools don't get the same tax breaks and smaller schools often have low test scores, Old books, and a bunch of hand-me-down equipment.

    Denmark, Sweden, and Norway all three have National Healthcare and they all 3 have 80%+ happiness ratings.

  • @Microtardz Ok well all the people that want public health care can go to one of those countries then. Healthcare problem overted.

  • @TheEodtch does that fix any problems in america or is that merely dodging the issues with poverty, unemployment, etc etc?

    Don't like out problems THEN MOVE!

    Yeah, how original.

    I also like how you blew the At least try something out of proportions.

  • @Microtardz I don't think you understand that, we cannot even afford universal healthcare... i'm against it to begin with, but maybe if our government would stop handing billions of dollars to countries who harbor terrorists, and don't care for their people, and spend it in america, and invest it wisely, it would be possible.

    about the school system thing... those budget raises never benefit your kid, they just pay overpaid superindendent's saleries... or atleast in New York...

  • @Microtardz Nassau County, New York, has 56 different superintendents for schools. They're all being paid from $125k-575k/yr. They all have about 5 lower assistants being paid atleast $50k/yr.

    New York City, which is larger, has 1 superintendent of schools, (chancellor) and works fine.

    ...don't you think thats wasted money...?

  • @BassLuke69 Oh yes.

    Take it over to a small town school in Kansas and find that same issue please.

    Actually, if our government would stop spending 7x's on war what China spends on war.

    We would be able to easily pay for universal health care.

    If we legalized Cannabis, we would be able to pay off the Government debt in 20 years, keep the war budget as is.

    And have Universal Health Care on top of it.

  • @Microtardz If you legalized weed, we would not be able to pay off the Government debt in 20 years... People would simply grow it in their own yards and there would be no way to tax it.

  • @Microtardz Lets all try drilling holes in our heads to see if it makes us smarter. At least we would be trying something. Lets try shoting the cancer out of people with guns, I bet we kill that cancer and it will be an attempt. Lets try jumping from a cliff to see if it makes us fly better at least we would be trying something. Lets just not try healthcare

  • @Microtardz Do you even realize that you sound even more ridiculous than weiner himself? And if I understand you correctly..you classify this as "sexual activity"? It sounds as if you are just as much of a weirdo as he is. Only youre not a dipshit progressive congressman which probably means your even more delusional.

  • @jgmetals81 The guy was stating he wouldn't want someone like weiner in office.

    I was merely stating the truth that of all the scandals, presidents seem to have the Most sex scandals, and some of them were pretty fucking presidents.

    Furthermore, I classify this as porn. Just an interactive porn...

    Should it affect his marriage? Yes

    Should affect the office he holds? No.

  • @TheEodtch /watch?v=HkJgo9c8sHk

    Bill made up shit, and used the Wall Street journal as a source.

    Instead of actually reading the bill himself >.>.

    Not shocking tho.

    Bill O'Reilly read?

    The guy who said FUCK IT WE'LL DO IT LIVE!! Read? HAH!

  • @Microtardz No he didn't make anything up. I bet Bill has read more of the bill than weiner.

  • @TheEodtch He did make shit up.

    A lot of the things were never in the bill man.

  • @Microtardz Keep saying it over and over maybe it will come true.

    Oh wait do you mean Weiner made shit up? Yes you are correct. See you are getting smart by the moment. Almost ready for 5th grade gov class.

  • @TheEodtch Actually, I was hoping you'd spend a few seconds to read the bill and read what Bill O'Reilly said.

    But oh well.

  • Well da weiner is a household name now???? Has camera will travel...LMAO

  • I wish you dumbasses would actually READ the Health Bill before accusing Weiner's arguments of having no substance. "You're making stuff up" isn't a baseles ad hominem designed to dodge the point. Bill O'Reilly said something that wasn't true. Weiner called him on it. Not dodging.

  • Weiner is so obviously a conniving moron. O'Reilly was speechless because he was trying to have an adult conversation that Weiner refused to participate in as an adult. Just kept basically calling names. I hope he runs for President. Maybe he'll choose his moral and intellectual equal, Barney Frank. I like that you can TELL with those two that they are flaming left wing moral morons.

  • @onholdjim Come on buddy, that Weiner has got more integrity and smarts in his little finger than your whole GOP 2012 cast is looking.Come on, Sarah Palin is gonna be your front runner in the GOP. And your trying to talk shit about Weiner. You just got Weinerised.

  • @nalani005 BWAHAHAHHAAAA!

    I had someone actually argue with me the other day that Sarah Palin would be a good president.

    I slammed my palm into my face and just started laughing.

    I couldn't argue back.

    It was too priceless LOL.

  • No, He didn't GET OReilly. Did you actually WATCH the video? How does someone like Weiner get elected? O'Reilly was speechless because Weiner's logic is incredibly (and purposely) misleading and inane. He simply stated that Bill O'Reilly was "making stuff up". He didn't provide a single shred of proof, and as usual, didn't answer a single question. I hope he does run for pres. and asks Barney Frank to be his running mate. They would lose to a monkey and a blowup doll! What a moron.

  • that old guy is so ugly ... perfect face for radio

  • He's good...

  • my weiner is better than your boehner

  • hey guys sorry im not from the us. but starting to become a fan of weiner. so which bill are they speaking about here?

  • @akanksha89 It's a provision of the new heathcare bill that states people have to have healthcare coverage or they will be fined. Bill O'Reilly is trying to scare people into thinking the IRS will send a hit man after a person if they do not pay. My understanding is a fine will be assess (if not ruled unconstitutional) and of course some will pay and some wont, but there will not be a warrant issued for their arrest or criminal charges. Not sure if that helps...hope so!

  • He finally admitted he isn't a smart man

  • Weiner is awesome!!!!!! Bill is a stupid asshole!

  • I'd like to see Weiner debate James Carville. Too bad (or not) they're on the same side.

  • Video not representative of actual interview. Wiener definitely dodges the question, that being said the answer to Bill O'Reilly's questions was not significant to the discussion at all and in conclusion he is a twat.

  • @Rjbcc No he didn't avoid it. He answered in 3 different ways. You are just to brain dead to know this. Sharing a brain with O'

    reilly isn't an attribute someone should be proud of

  • @splicedenergy I called Bill the twat smart guy, maybe you should re-read my comment.

  • @splicedenergy This has been happening all day. It is not my fault that comments are rolling in so fast the server cant keep up. This wasnt a reply to you. I was responding to the guy 5 or 6 messages below you

  • Video not representative of actual interview. Wiener definitely dodges the question, that being said the answer to Bill O'Reilly's questions was not significant to the dicussion at all and in conclusion he is a twat.

  • Post the whole interview to hear Weiner sound like an imbecile

  • haha I am a big fan of Congressman Weiner and no fan of O'Reilly, but I must say that if you watch the whole interview, Weiner does completely dodge the question. I disagree with the rhetorical point that O"Reilly was trying to make -- I am a supporter of the Affordable Care Act and think we need to do more on the health reform front -- but Weiner doesn't really address the process that is taken against people who choose to opt out of the mandate

  • you need to watch the whole interview. weiner is an idiot

  • This Weiner has balls.

  • @elasticbowman He sure does and now everyones seen them.

  • @elasticbowman i just saw weiners balls on google image and yes he does......no homo

  • @elasticbowman Don't mistake a loud mouth for balls...

  • @elasticbowman This Weiner has balls?

    Yeah, blue balls.....in more ways than one.

  • I watch CNN or any news agencies besides FOX, you know why because i agree with Weiner they make stuff up. They would say anything to defend the Republicans even if it is lying to the American people or the world.

  • Weiner 1

    O'Reilly 0

    HAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHA!

  • Bill needs a good ass-kicking.

  • what a scumbag Bill'O the clown is.. lies lies and more lies

  • big fan of weiner but i thought o'reilly's question was legitimate and deserving of an answer.

  • @cupmyplums the answer is this, why would you create a universal healthcare plan that is designed, DESIGNED, to save money in the long run by (some would say force) asking everybody to get healthcare if there is no incentive to do so? We should stop footing the bill for people without insurance, people clogging up our emergency rooms, we should get everybody on a plan and we will save money in the long run.

  • @cupmyplums he answered it but as usual Bill'O the clown didn't want to hear it so he could badger the guest

  • What the heck does that mean? I work my ass off. In fact, I am heading into work now, Sunday morning, so I can give more of what I make to the government so they can decide who is more deserving of my money. Until you pay 50% of what you make to Uncle Sam (yes, I know there is no marginal tax rate at that, but I've added it up, factored in AMT effect, SS/FICA for both employer/employee... I am self employed, etc), don't judge me or think I don't have a vested interest in how tax $ are spent!

  • @TPED12 but if someone has paid into the system alltheir life under the premise tha money will be there for them at a specific age or in event of disability, it is THEIR money. they invested it into a fund that the US government has been pilfering. youR TAX DOLLARS ARE NOT TAKING CARE OF ME. I INVESTED THAT MONEY, by force, in our government, now its MINE, not YOURS

  • @BeingNobody1956 What about people like me who have paid into the system our entire lifes? I'll never see a penny of that money! You think thats fair?

  • @TPED12 i dont think they should touch social security..PERIOD

  • @TPED12 It's not fair if you meet the requirements to get some money. It IS fair if you do not meet the requirements to get the money.

  • Weiner for president!

  • @Yardsnail and you are a fucked up Asshole

  • @Yardsnail spoke too soon my friend :)

  • Ok...I'll say it...I LOVE WIENER!

    lol...

  • WOW! he fucking got O'ReillY!? This is honestly rare to leave O'Reilly speechless. The USA needs Weiner to be a household name ASAP.

  • @Ryz0n89 are you watching what im watching? he didnt "get" O'Reilly, how out shouted him. In actuality, O'Reilly "got" him because Wiener completely avoided the question. He accused O'Reilly of making things up when he never actually stated a fact. He said "The IRS then comes in and deals with this person." Wiener says thats not true, and then completely avoides the question, eventhough O'Reilly asked the question two or three more times.

    Who was "gotten" now? Definitely Wiener.

  • @greenday89597 He did answer. Bill O'Reilly says if someone refuses to talk about his healthcare status, the IRS will come and deal with this person. He says nobody comes after you. You are not a criminal, you won't be under investigation. You'll just be fined. so the IRS doesn't come in and deal with this person at all.

  • @greenday89597 i dont know. i heard a response. but then i was not looking for only the response i wanted. that is o'rielly specialty. asking questions and trying to intimidate you into giving the answer he wants to hear, to meet his agenda. if you dont give the answer he wants you to give you are "avoiding the question"

    he has no integrity. and yes. he does make things up. all the time

  • @greenday89597 Yes we're watching what you're watching, a blowhard asking loaded questions and Wiener not having any obligation to play O'Rielly's stupid ratings game. Go back 2 school

  • @Ryz0n89 dude you should have seen the whole thing lmfao.... and trust me i see all the channels fox,cnn and even msnbc...

  • @Ryz0n89 Yes...perfect as a household name. This guy really stands up for what is right and decent. I mean, who wouldn't want this guy to be a role model for their kids. He is the definition of "class act" if i ever saw it.

  • @Ryz0n89 He is now.

  • Many costs are diverted to consumers other than health care. Those are incidentals to conducting business. Manufacturing loss among others. If government would not tax the crap out of middle America they could afford to donate to charities that voluntarily help offset the costs of health care. Not to mention pharmaceuticals, why are we not hitting up the unfair us % of research cost distribution? Is medicare a money maker? welfare? or medicaid? Government creates red tape not green or black.

  • Wow simple question was asked and , all he got was a bloviating weiner.

  • Everybody knows Obama is going to hire 500,000,000,000 additional IRS agents to hunt people down that dont get health insurance, then they'll be hauled to a gulag in Montana where they'll be water boarded until they buy insurance. Its true, saw it on fox news.

  • @dasboot19801 Ok if you don't buy insurance, who will check? And how would they do that? they would need personal info about you. Ok who has that data? Ahh the IRS, yes Bob is broke he gets a voucher, but mike here didn't buy but makes enough fine him! Ok Who imposes said fine and who collects? Or do you think the gov will just let it go as weiner suggests?

  • @1fatcat3 Legitimate questions. Since the "penalty phase", wont kick in until 2016, no one will be "checking" till then. As I understand it, this will be accomplished by providing proof of insurance on annual tax returns. Without proof of insurance, you will be assessed an additional tax. Since tax returns are already being processed, this wont require the hiring of a bazillion IRS agents as the insurance company propagandists have alledged.

  • Whinner cannot face the truth and answer the question.... as the current law stands, it will be the IRS that enforces a fine if someone does not disclose that they have health insurance.... why can't whinner be a man and tell it like it is!

  • @tiredBNtaxed2death obvious troll is obvious. try a different username next time.

  • A man who can admit he isn't smart is truly a smart man. I love this Anthony Weiner guy!

  • MO'R(on)eilly

  • Maybe if Weiner actually read the bill he would learn something... Bill O'Reilly is 100% correct about the IRS!! Kinda scary that they pushed for and passed this bill and didn't know what was in it... His little analogy about littering was pathetic...