Jazak'Allah Khair for your hard work! This is exactly what we need! So many young unsuspecting brothers are being misled by the Salafi preachers (may Allah be pleased with their good and guide them where they err), so such clarifications are essential!
وهناك فرق عزيزي بين مايعلمه الرسول للصحابه و ما يخصه لمن يحتاجه في شيء فمثلا الاعمى اللذي اتى يطلب الرسول الدعاء له ان الله يشفيه فقد علمه الرسول بدعاء خصه به وهو حي يرزق وصيغة الدعاء كانت يا الله بحق نبيك لم يات احد بعد وفاته يناجي الرسول او يطلب من الرسول ان يشفيه او يدعو له بالرزق فهنا تكون الاشكاليه لان الرسول قد توفى ومع الرفيق الاعلى اسال الله ان يجمعنا به
عزيزي اولا انا احبك بالله لجميع مقاطعك وان كنت اختلف معك في طريقة طرح هذا الفديو او محاولة تشويه الاخ بلال حتى وان اخطء
واحب ان اشاركك في النقاش واطرح عليك سؤال واتمنى الاجابه عليه ايمكن لنا كمسلمين ان ناخذ جزء من ايه او حديث ونبني عليه معتقد اسلامي بدون قرائة الايه كامله او الحديث كامل ؟
كذلك التحيات او التشهد فلايجوز لنا عزيزي ان ناخذ جزئية السلام عليك ايها النبي ونترك البقيه فماذا يقع بعدها ؟
السلام علينا وعلى عباد الله الصالحين هل معناته نتوسل بعباد الله؟
MuhaddithDotOrg: Forgive me if this comment sounds like a rant but I do have some questions.
2- Dr. Philips is contributing his effort to Islam as are you (For which I respect both grealty). Why does it feel that you have turned your focus on someone who is trying to spread Islam when there are enough misunderstandings and ignorance to fill countries. If that is the case which has the greater benifit? Correcting the spreading of Islam or Correcting the ignorant of Islam.
The result of people who follow Bilal Philips is that they wrongly accuse other Muslims of shirk, which is a grave error that must be corrected to prevent the splitting of the Islamic nation which should have a higher priority than dawa.
And while our previous efforts have been focused on refuting attacks against Islam, since Bilal Philips is himself attacking Islamic scholars and the majority of the Islamic nation, this also falls into the same category.
@islamophobia4dummies I don't know much about Bilal Philips. But from what I've seen, I think he's knowledgeable enough to know the difference between Nabi and Rasool, and that was a pure mistake
However, I'm glad you pointed out his mistakes about giving salam to Rasulullah (sm). It would be nice if you directly contact Bilal Philips about his contradicting speech please.
MuhaddithDotOrg: Forgive me if this comment sounds like a rant but I do have some questions.
1- For the first comment on Bilal Philips when he mentions "calling on the prophet." I could have misunderstand but my understanding from Dr. Philips was: if you ask the prophet for help and the prophet is dead then he cannot help you or that would be considered shirk. If so then I believe he is right.
the people who disagree with you about asking for the Prophet's help (by praying and interceding for us after his death) include the companion Uthman ibn Hunayf, Imam Malik, and Imam Ahmed. These are among the earliest and best 3 generations, ie, the Salaf al Saleh, and we challenge anyone to quote one single person among the Salaf al Saleh who explicitly disagrees with this view.
sunna explains in detail for example zam zam and the story behind with Ismail as and Hagar ra , so we see there is a bridge to sunna in perfect system wehn we leave the system and use the sunna where Koran has been clear that there is nothing more to be explained not only the aspect metnioned but caried out in detail, then still people ask the sunna to separately form new laws apart from the Koran! This is the main problem we have.
as I said before, your entire premise of relying on the Quran "only" is refuted by the Quran itself:
16:44 {...that you (ie, Prophet Muhammad) may MAKE CLEAR to men what has been revealed to them}
4: 59 {Obey Allah and obey the Messenger and those of you who are in authority. (And) if you differ in anything amongst yourselves, refer it to Allah and His Messenger}
And even such a basic thing such as how to pray is not explicitly described in the Quran.
Koran mention prayer, sunna explains detail, Koran mentions safa marwa- sunna explains in detail, Koran mentions hajj and mentions the stations , sunna in detail, Koran mentions wudu complete, sunna explains details, Koran mentions do not come near the women in menstration, sunna explain detail, Koran mentions funeral, sunna explains in detail, washing the dead body, Koran mentions supplications, sunna the details, Koran mentions purity, sunna explains circumcision, Koran mentions signs of mekka
Yes we want to return to the Quran & Sunnah ACCORDING TO THE MOST QUALIFIED UNDERSTANDING (e.g. the 4 mujtahideen) NOT ACCORDING DEFICIENT BOASTFUL CLAIMS OF OTHERS. THIS IS SO CLEAR YET U REFUSE IT.
The Prophet PBUH said: "I was given the quran, and similar to it, with it"
Sayyidina ali (R) and Sayyidina Umran Ibn HuSSain (& other companions) ridiculed people who said "all we need is the Quran.
Please leave your blind fanaticism (ta3assub a3ma) & study such history and info.
part 3 however the madhabs disputed on this , one say haram one say not etc. and this is our problem we have in Islam a strict clear guideline and we have the best explanation for the Koran and beating the one who make zina by 100 lashes its explanation is not stoning to death- I just want everyone to bring up the Koran to the supreme and really not using ahadeeth fpr forming new laws which contradict the Koran, hope you understand my point.
you are asking for something that is impossible...to have ONLY 1 correct answer to all questions. All of the mathaheb's opinions are taken and accepted, and we have the ability to choose among them what to do with no extremism of 1 opinion over another. As the original example, these guys attacking me because my beard is not to their preference is unislamic. You are ending up doing the same thing...trying to force 1 interpretation, when many can be acceptable.
@islamophobia4dummies no not at all..I am only trying to say refer to the Sunna , the Koran gives us a way to Sunna in mentioning things but not giving further explanation and leaving this out to be explained by the prophet sas, for example safa and marwa is mentioned in Koran but not the background which is explained in sunna or prayer is mentioned but no described left out and explained in sunna, hajj mentioned for example the devil will be stoned prophecy by god and we see effect in sunna
I dearly challenge everyone here to show me one verse in Koran that we have to follow the companions of Muhammad sas, where do you find this verse timeless, I tell you what I follow you find it so clear in Koran but may be you do not want it- this refers to everyone here: read 6:152 ff- if you read in these verses it is forbidden to shave beard, I will wear it as long as possible, pls. stop disputing where the Koran does not leave a shadow of doubt, look where it leads....
"We have revealed to you the Reminder that you may MAKE CLEAR to men what has been revealed to them, and that haply they may reflect." 16:44
and Prophet Muhammad told us to follow his Sunnah and that of the Khulafa al Rashideen, and Prophet Muhammad also described the best 3 generations (the Companions, the Tabi'in and Tabi' al Tabi'in).
But regarding the beard, shaving the beard is makruh according to many Shafi'i scholars.
@islamophobia4dummies you bring it to the point, follow the prophet sas, and the prophet sas followed the Koran so must do everyone, follow the Koran, and we are not allowed to form new laws, but when we see the Koran did not explicitely forbid something we must see if the thing is good or bad because the Koran teaches us the good things are allowed, so we must always examine espcially in modern times, therefore we follow the Koran and the best understanding resulting from this in the sunna
part 2: but it is of vital importance to follow the Koran, for example donkey it is said is haram and compare 6:146 so we see we are not allowed to forbid what the Koran did not forbid and for the new things in modern times we must always check if it is good or bad, the Koran teaches us this with alcool, alcool has good and bad but the bad exceeds , this is example of evaluation, so we can say eating Gorilla is not forbidden!!! but if it causes health harm etc. it is not allowed.
part 2 the Koran gives clear way to sunna by mentioning something without giving background but surely every reader wants to know and thus we can see Allah swt intention to give a role for the sunna but we shall not refer to sunna where Koran is 100 % clear and leaves nothing out to be further explained, the sunna has its place and the Koran gives bridge to it this is the perfect system in our religion while we went over to only ask the sunna even what the Koran explained in detail
why when ahadeeth have two positions und uncertitude indeed you are not then referring back to the Koran, only invoke Allah swt is of most vital importance to avoid the glimpse of shirk since this sin is so big it is better to rely here on the clear words from Koran and never forget, it can be you say, the prophet said and rely on sahih hadith but still the prophet sas did not say this- so we have the Koran as guidance. Blessed Ramadan.
1- the hadiths are only contradictory for salafis, but not for the 4 mathaheb. the fact is that the rain prayer was a group supplication needing an imam
2- Please do not put words in our mouth.
You wrote "only invoke Allah"...do you know that Salafis permit tawassul through the living...so why don't you tell Bilal Philips and Salafis to stop shirk and "only invoke Allah".
That is the problem with these false premises that are confusing people.
@islamophobia4dummies der brother to greet the prophet directly today is not shirk I did not say this, as we also greet the angels, this is form of respect no invovation, if we ask for help we only ask Allah swt, if we say, oh Allah swt help me, see I love the prophet Muhammad sas, what is the problem it is you give humble effort to "convince" Allah swt as you are helpless so long no one ask Muhammad sas for help, no problem at all, yes it is wrong to ask the living ones,
for help, we ask the livong ones to ask Allah swt for forgiveness if we had dispute with them because how can we ask human for forgiveness, so when we have dispute we ask the one we had dispute with oh pray for me for forgiveness as Youssef brother did in relation to Ayoub as in Koran. So brother it is only important to observe this, some people shout out ya rasulah when something terrible happens, as if asking him for help or comfort and this is strictly forbidden. May Allah swt guard us.
@islamophobia4dummies since in Koran no beard is mentioned at all, it is an act which is not imperative as Allah swt did not make it in Koran imperative, read pls. brother 6:146 this applied to everyone who wants to make imperative what is not made in Koran imperative, the Koran has all what we need to enter paradise , we shall not search of other law sources then Koran and the hadeeth we need for explaining the Koran not for having new strict laws, we would have unity if we would observe this.
We did not accuse Ibn Taymiyyah of bid'a...it was Sheikh ul Islam Imam al Sibki that declared Ibn Taymiyyah's bid'a, which was quoted by many Islamic scholars throughout the centuries.
A bid'a is a new innovation introduced in the religion, & prior to Ibn Taymiyyah, Imam Ahmed & Imam al Nawawi taught tawassul, among others, & for 650 years, not a single Muslim scholar ever objected to tawassul through the Prophet (pbuh). Therefore, Ibn Taymiyyah;s objection is a bid'a by definition.
If you want to give islamic sermons at least have a beard so you don't look like a deviant with your goatee also salafi means to follow the salaf meaning the early generations so the whole principle of it is to eradicate bidah and it seems only people who call for bidah have something to say about ''salafis''
& if like some other fanatic salafis in this comment section,
you object about THE LENGTH OF HIS BEARD:
1- It IS ACCEPTABLE according to mujtahideen (who obtained unanimous consensus of the nation, as qualified to provide opinions) unlike ignorant salafi-claimers.
2- The PREFERRED length of the beard is 1 handful,
but ACCORDING TO YOU (not to us) Bilal Philips is DEVIANT by excellence,
yet you insist to defend him AT ALL COSTS.
This is the ultimate BLIND FANATICISM (ta3assub a3ma).
@MuhaddithDotOrg Can I ask you one question do you pray to dead people?? You sound like the guys who do they always complain about people following the salif because they appose mushriks and Allah is above the 7th heaven on his Throne Golry be to him how can people say He swt is everywhere? Do you ascribe Allah to be in filthy places what a evil thing to say Golry be to Him above that
U should stop consuming whatever you took before writing this comment of yours:
1- We obviously do not pray to dead people, we pray only to Allah. Salafi-pretenders will see us clinging to their throats inshallah in the hereafter, for this irresponsible accusation.
2- U have un-Islamic guts & immoral daring 2 accuse us of saying "Allah is everywhere".
Wake up:
Allah CREATED all matter, HE DOESN'T SHARE ANY ATTRIBUTE W HIS CREATION.
If he was UP for you, He would be DOWN for others!!!
@MuhaddithDotOrg bilal philips leaves his beard some people beard will not grow to a fist length and bottom line he looks like a muslim if you are going to call sheiks of islam doers of bidah and resemble the mushrikeen in appearance obviously people are going to laugh at you
@MuhaddithDotOrg firstly I am not salafi secondly the majority view is at least one fist length is obligotory, I do not have a fist length beard but at least I admit I am wrong for it instead of trying to find loopholes and holding weird opinions not supported by the majority, devient by excellence?? what does that mean? You people cant get anything right I follow the messenger of Allah sws and stick to the sound opinions held by his companions as he sws commanded us to follow their sunnah
last time I checked, this was not a video about beards, and we made no claims about beards in this video.
also, your criticism of my beard is rejected by Muslim scholars, as I am 100% in line with the shafi'i math-hab.
Where is your criticism of Bilal Philips that his beard is not long enough?
And again, according to your own criteria, if you reject our words since my beard is not long enough (or because I do not grow hair on my cheeks), then your argument is false for the same reason
The "majority" view means there are OTHER views and you are too UNQUALIFIED to dare dictate your OWN SELECTION upon other Muslims.
This is the problem with "Salafi-pretenders".
Despite your false claims of not being a salafi, there are no other explanations for your blind fanaticism: You are not only a "Salafi-false-pretender", we suspect deeply that you are an utter liar. Sorry that you forced us to call you on it.
You "stick" only to your own opinion, no matter how wrong it is.
@lilblitz sorry in time of Ramadan you wrote a very bad word, can you look into his heart, see you reduce your sight to the beard, you can be easily affected by hypocrites, this is reason the agents from Mossad had easy game to deceive muslims by false agents, Muslims thought they are with them because of ..the beard, never judge in terms Allah swt did not teach us to judge- no verse in the Koran mentions we can recognize a muslim with the help of beard or that it is precondition to preach
ive just checked your channel and i realised that u actually support Harun Yahya, how can u support such a person whose aqeedah is so wrong, and he said Allah is everywhere so Allah is even in human, therefore its not point worshipping external being, we can just worship ourself. shame on u for supporting such people with wrong aqeedah. knowing the truth, u still hide it.
@Naive991 - 2 Secondly, we never give "blanket supports". What we support from Harun Yahya are his videos refuting Darwinism, which is a GREAT SERVICE to the Islamic nation, and which Bilal Philips has NOT EVEN COME **NEAR** TO DOING SO. On the contrary, Bilal Philips is appointing himself as the divider of the nation to say "beware of this" "beware of that" and to make false accusations of shirk, which is ALL extremely un-Islamic, & which is exactly what we are pointing out in these videos.
u sufi r same, presenting fake evidence all the time. giving references to weak Hadiths and in the video u never really gave a real reply to bilal phillips comments on saying ya muhammad. if u r correct then tell me y did the sahaba didnt say ya muhammad after prophets death. and what about all the hadiths
please pay closer attention to the video...we presented ample evidence of hadiths that the companions did say "...ya rasullullah..." after the Prophet's death.
Recheck the video between 3:08 to 3:59, and pay special note to the annotation starting at 3:49
furthermore, we challenge you to provide evidence against EVEN ONE hadith we cited that it is weak, this is absolutely a false statement from your side. It is very convenient of you to accuse others of citing weak hadiths whenever the Prophet's words (pbuh) do not support your ideology.
no thats not true, i honestly want to follow the straight path of prophet S.A.W. i dont wanna support any sectarian group. anyway its no point u challenging me when u havent answered my question. am asking u y r there so many hadiths stating that the followers of prophet stopped saying ya muhammad in namaz, in tashhud after his death and instead they said peace be on the messenger. yyyy????? did they change that.
we provided evidence in the video that BOTH the Khalifa Abu Bakr AND the Khalifa Umar taught the tashahhud "ON THE PULPIT" as being "...assalaamu ALAIKA...".
Which 100% refutes Bilal Philips claim that saying "ya rasullullah" is shirk,
ive checked the video link that u gave me. i agree that harun yahya as done some good work, but he has certainly supported that allah is everywhere and this is not allegation, this is truth about him, his books r published in turkey, READ HIS BOOKS. also whenever someone points something in your sheikhs, u start to say that its allegation. u deny the truth very qucikly and u r too quick to point at others.
it is clear to me that this statement "Allah is everywhere" was stated Bilal Philips in making his accusations against other Muslims, where he never provided a quote, reference or page number.
This is in stark contrast to when Bilal Philips makes claims about Christians or Shia, he quotes specific words in specific books, and we are telling you that any accusation against another Muslim requires at least that much evidence.
As for Harun Yahya, we do not consider him a "Sheikh".
@Naive991 U accused us of "presenting fake evidence... giving references to weak hadiths".
It's IMMORAL (& un-Islamic) 2 make NON-SUPPORTED accusations.
U NEED 2 CHANGE YR "AFFILIATION" in order 2 get rid of such un-Islamic features.
We demand now (& inshallah will insist in the hereafter) that U show whatever honesty you may have, by CITING which hadiths are "fake", and which are "weak". Plz cite scholars that said so, not your personal opinion: opinions not supported by scholars R worthless.
One more proof for the Salafis who say that calling out Ya Muhammed is worship to Muhammed SAW. Woe to you all salafis for it is proven authentic even by Salafi Albani for the hadith reported by Imam Abu Ya'la that Issa AS will descent and call out Ya Muhammed SAW for which our Prophet SAW will reply back:
أخرجه أبو يعلى في " مسنده " : حدثنا أحمد بن عيسى : ابن وهب عن أبي صخر أن سعيد المقبري أخبره أنه سمع أبا هريرة يقول : سمعت رسول الله صل الله عليه وسلم : فذكره . قلت : وهذا إسناد جيد رجاله كلهم ثقات رجال الشيخين ، غير أبي صخروهو حميد بن زياد الخراط . فمن رجال مسلم وحده
What a pity on all you salafis for you have even blamed Issa AS for worshipping other than Allah!!!!! “
@ abdulbasith77 - YES . Al Haithami said in . مجمع الزوائد . وعن أبي هريرة قال . سمعت رسول الله صلى الله عليه وسلم يقول . والذي نفس أبي القاسم بيده . لينزلن عيسى بن مريم إماماً مقسطاً وحكماً عدلاً . فليكسرن الصليب ويقتلن الخنزير . وليصلحن ذات البين وليذهبن الشحناء . وليعرضن المال فلا يقبله أحد . ثم لئن قام على قبري . فقال . يا محمد . لأجبته. رواه أبو يعلى . *** ورجاله رجال الصحي *** . BUT SALAFI-PRETENDERS PREFER THEIR OWN OPINION ***OVER*** THE QURAN AND SUNNAH.
Abu Bakr RA called on the Prophet SAW and in Bilal's words this is shirk to call the Prophet SAW. Imam Gazzali RA reports the same hadith with an extension wherein Abu Bakr RA requests the Prophet not to forget us. All you salafis are you with the Sahabas and the Imams or are youll still justifying this stupid stand. One more logical ? If i call out and seek help from a deaf person knowingly that he cannot listen, is it shirk?? What an idiotic stand??
Jazak Allah Khair brother... that is a great one, which we have added as an annotation starting at 3:50, along with the Prophet (pbuh) saying "YA MUSA" in the Isra wal Miraj (also from Bukhari)
the companion Uthman Ibn Hunayf is exponentially more qualified to teach the tawassul du'a after the death of the Prophet. The distinction of asking Allah vs asking the Prophet is from Ibn Taymiyyah, & NOT FROM THE PROPHET or the companions (ie, bid'a).
So I refer you to the same verse you quoted: "This day I have perfected for you your relgion". On THAT DAY, the Prophet did NOT say to stop tawassul through him after his death, NOR did he say to NEVER ask him for his intermediation.
Anything umar bint Kittab May Allah be pleased with him taught was just a revival of teh Sunnah during the Propeht's peace and blessings eb upon him's lifetime.
INtercessions is ranted by Allah, ou to Allah for it like after teh Athan for example, you give Salaam to Muhamamd peace and blessings be upon him but you don't ask of him from teh unseen as he doesn't have that ability and made errors. REad Aayatul Kursi, you ask ONly of Allah, things happen only with his permission, even intercession.
WOW, you have a lot of nerve to attack the Khalifah Umar. SHAME ON YOU.
SHAME, SHAME, SHAME ON YOU.
The sunna of the Khulafa al Rashideen is a requirement to follow according to Prophet Muhammad (pbuh) himself, so please take your silly ideas away from here.
what little knowledge you have... tawassul through the Prophet (pbuh) after his death does not mean that we think that the Prophet has ANY ability EXCEPT through Allah.
So do you think that LIVING PEOPLE actually have the POWER of tawassul WITHOUT ALLAH?
Whether dead or alive, EVERYTHING is WITH ALLAH'S PERMISSION.
You are committing a much more grave error, as it seems you missed the FACT that living people DO NOT HAVE ANY POWER of tawassul either, EXCEPT with Allah's permission.
ASking Prophet Muhammad peace adn blessings be upon him from the unseen is incorrect, he even made mistakes as he once differeed with Umar bin Kitab May Allah be pleased with him and Umar May Allah be pleased with him held the right opinion with regards to prisoner of war, he are imitaiing he X-tians as they did with ISa alehas salem asking to tehm in their prayers, this is wrong, you can Greet Prophet Muhamamd peace adn blessings be upon him but not ask of him. You ask of Allah.
THe Qur'an is more qualitfied, its obviouls you either misquoted Sahaba or follow post colonial liars who misquote left and right.
Just read the Ayat you are speculative liar.
6:50 Say (O Muhammad صلى الله عليه وسلم): "I don't tell you that with me are the treasures of Allah, nor (that) I know the Unseen; nor I tell you that I am an angel. I but follow what is revealed to me." Say: "Are the blind and the one who sees equal? Will you not then take thought?"
An OPENLY declared rightly guided Khulafa Umar bin Kittab MAy Allah be pleased with him said, we used to ask Prophet Muhammad peace and blessings be upon him to ask Allah for rain for us but now that he has passed away we ask his Uncle Al Abbas May Allah be pleased with him to ask Allah for rain for us. (paraphrasing).
watch?v=CkRMfKe1WGc&feature=watch_response
72:18 And the mosques are for Allah (Alone): so invoke not anyone along with Allah.
you wrote "repent, stop blind bidah" bother it is truly time for you to repent and stop your own bidah. We have given you the clear, unequivocal and authentic hadith of Uthman ibn Hunayf, yet you ignore it and accuse a companion of bid'a? Shame on you.
Regarding Khalifah Umar's action, I challenge you to find a hadith explanation (for 600 years prior to Ibn Taymiyyah) where they understood what you claim...you cannot.
The "du'a al istisqa" was a group supplication that needed an imam.
@UT5000 At last akhi a brother who understands not to call on dead people don't these mushriks realise what has their shirk benefited them has Allah swt given them more lol rather they are in low positions and they dont even see it of all the sins to risk why would they risk shirk especially when all the evidence is clear against them
You have ZERO evidence from the Quran and Sunnah that quote"asking Prophet Muhammad pbuh from the unseen is incorrect". You are just regurgitating and blindly following the statements of Ibn Taymiyyah.
The minute you admit that there is a wording of tawassul through the Prophet (pbuh) that Ibn Taymiyyah accepts, then your entire claim is invalidated.
Since when is there a du'a that, if a phrase is not mentioned, then it becomes shirk?
This guy has no knowledge whatsoever and he is messing things up and he has a big major problem of everything. It is just an attack against salafis who call for worship for Allah alone swt. This youtube does not follow a correct manhaj( way)
And yes where is your beard if u want to follow the companion
so non-salafis do not "call for worship for Allah alone"...now you claim a monopoly on tawheed?
Sorry, it is Bilal Philips who is "messing things up", as we have his exact quotes right in the video.
As for the beard, I never knew that this was a criteria for truth. Where is your beard...since I do not see your beard in this comment, then you must not be truthful?
According to the Shafi'i mathhab, i maintain the minimum requirement of a beard, which is the hair on the chin. However, the length of my beard (and that of most "salafis" like Bilal Philips) is still considered Makruh by Imam al Shafi'i as it is not long enough.
And this is typical of your extremism of trying to force Muslims to your opinion, and force them to follow you blindly, even when there are Mujtahideen who disagree with you.
There is no minimum requirement Prophet Muhammad PEace and blessings be upon him said don't touch it, that means let it grow, some peopel's beards don't grow due to genes, that is fine, but unless that is teh case, shaving the beard of anything on the JAw bone is not allowed.
"did he say never ... intermediation"
HE taught how to ask for intercession, what now we are going to do teh things he never said not to do. ISlam is clear, no that vague made up speech of yours.
Plz don't allow readers to tell you "DO NOT BE STUPID" by saying "don't touch" (the beard) bcz then, ACCORDING TO U, U SHOULD NOT LISTEN TO ANY PERSON ON EARTH, except weirdos who, according to your grandiose invention, NEVER CUT THEIR BEARD.
I saw a western comic-looking person with a lonnnng beard & cowboy hat.
Is this the person U like to follow? He does NOT cut his beard ! (maybe only each 10 years).
The speaker gave U the mujtahideen's opinion, but U want to FORCE YOUR opinion.
you only show your ignorance when you wrote "you are most probably a sufi extremists, which is a mathhab pretending to ...".
Tasawwuf is recognized by IBN TAYMIYYAH and IBN ABDULWAHHAB as a valid Islamic science, and has NEVER been considered a mathhab, so please take your ignorance elsewhere.
Did they ask for his intercesssion while eh was alive, or did they ask Allah, there is a difference between greeting and calling from the UNSEEN Which only ALLAH controls, you have proven , nothing and most probably made up those fake hadiths,
Uhtman Ibn Hunayf taught the tawassul prayer AFTER the death of the Prophet.
Ibn Taymiyyah also admits that companions said "Ya Rasul Allah" when their legs fell asleep to cure it (and this is also considered tawassul).
Did you even watch the video, or do you just troll people without knowledge?
As for you claim that we used "fake hadiths", we challenge you to prove this SLANDER, and we will see you on the day of judgement for Allah to decide about this.
Concerning Shaykh Albaanee then it is stated shaykh Ibn Baz said 'I have not seen anyone under the surface of the sky with more knowledge of the Hadeeth in our current time than the likes of the great scholar, Muhammad Naasir-ud-Deen Al-Albaanee.' He was like any other man and made mistakes and was right but he was a scholar and an expert in the field of hadith. As for bilal phillips it would be better to refer to the permanent committee and the council of senior scholars.
Eventually, even Bin Baz couldn't stomach Albani's deviations.
Albani is a self taught person, as witnessed by Hadeeth scholars in his hometown Damascus. Even laymen there know that fact.
Numerous hadeeth scholars detailed numerous of the results of his "self-teaching", displaying unacceptable blunders, including the audacity to refuse hadeeths from Saheeh al Bukhari (accepted as authentic by Ijmaa'...). Such expert Muhaddith scholars range from India, the Middle East, to Morocco.
Also, plz be aware that Ibn Baz is not considered the reference to Muslims on Islamic knowledge. Numerous scholars refuse many of his opinions. How can he testify to the expertise of Albani in Hadeeth, without himself being a hadeeth scholar (and "hafiz", i.e. memorizing hundreds of thousands of hadeeths)?
Neither Albani nor Bin Baz have reached the level that allows them to judge on the authenticity of hadeeths (which again requires to be a Hafiz, not a mere "BOOK OWNER").
@MuhaddithDotOrg Shaykh Albanee has an ijaaza from many scholars, two of these are Shaykh Raaghib Tabbaakh and Shaykh Bahjatul Baitaar, a copy of this ijaaza is with one of his students Al-Halabi. So do not lie about this noble scholar who spent his life devoted to this religion. It is also narrated by Shaykh 'Asheesh that the noble Shaykh has memorised a hundred thousand hadith with their isnad. - part 1
@islamophobia4dummies And I take it you know 99% of the Islamic scholars in Syria personally then. and as for Saudi Arabia then it is from the best of lands and contains many scholars and yes there are scholars outside it who we take from such as Shaykh Hammad ansaree, Shaykh Muqbil, Shaykh Yahya Al Hajoorie , Shaykh Muhammed amin Shinqinti, Shaykh Muhammad aman al jamee, we take knowledge from the likes of these scholars who are known and trusted by the people
Sorry shaikh Bahjat al Bitar is not a Muhaddith and we challenge the Ijazah you mention: Bring it forth and we will double check it (inshallah).
I met Sh. Bahjat Al Bitar myself, may Allah have mercy on his soul. He was definitely a pro Wahabi (yet owed the respect of my teachers and mine), and IF he gave such an Ijazah, we will prove that it was NOT PURSUANT TO LEARNING.
Al Albani was a clock maker, riding a bike (no disrespect intended, these are just the facts) from his house back and forth, NOT to an Islamic school but to his clock SHOP near Masjid al Utaibah where Shaikh Abul Khair al Maidani used to have his daily lessons for decades.
(Shaikh Abul Khair Al Maidani was elected unanimously by Syria's scholars as head of the league of Ulamaa.)
Albani slowly gathered sniplets from Al Maktabah Zahiriyyah, WITHOUT being taught.
Then his "students" started "publicizing him at the circle of Sh Abul Khair in Masjid al Utaibah, reiterating that Albani was THE learned, THE MOST learned... taunting the circle of Sh Abul Khair (in their own circle of studies).
Eventually Shaikh Abul Khair accepted the "taunt" and proposed a debate, where Sh All albani would bring around 30 questions from all branches of Islamic disciplines, and where A STUDENT of Sh. Abul Khair (Sh. Mahmoud Al Rankousi, my personal teacher, recounter of this incident) would bring the same number of questions from the same fields.
My teacher Sh. Mahmoud Al Rankousi said: That was the end of it: That person never came back to the circle again (in Masjid al Utaibah).
It is sad to mention that it was a publicly known fact that Al Albani's father did not consider him at all as "baar" (i.e. under the acceptance and good pleasure) to himself, his father. Sorry this is just a fact, and it does affect one's credibility in the ability to comprehend Islamic texts, may Allah forgive him.
@MuhaddithDotOrg As stated before a copy of the ijazah is with one of his students Ali Hasan bin Ali bin Abdul-Hameed al-Halabi, Shaykh Albanee also studied under the following shaykhs, Shaykh Sa'eed al-Burhan, Shaykh Tawfiq al-Barzah, he also met the noble scholar Ahmad Shakir. The noble shaykh also met the indian hadith scholar Shaykh Abdul-Samad Sharf ad-Deen who considered him to be a great hadith scholar in the letters sent to him.-Part 1
Shaikh Said al BURHANI is among the great scholars that REJECTED Albani's claims, & himself accepts & defends tawassul, Sufism, and rejects Salafism, Wahabism, & especially Albani's false claims.
You are cheating or being cheated (therefore following others blindly).
Albani may have "visited" a few lectures of Sh Said al Burhani; al Burhani's son is available to testify that Albani was no "student" of his father, & we'll bring a LONG list of scholars who refuted Albani inshallah.
@MuhaddithDotOrg It is not following blindly as Allah says in the qu'ran ' If a rebellious evil person comes to you with a news, verify it, lest you harm people in ignorance,' so rather what I did was accept the saying of the truthful. As for defending sufism tell me was the messenger of Allah a sufi or who was it who came with sufism, as for shaykh Albani many scholars have defended and praised him, these are scholars who are known and trusted by the people and his students are alive, ask them
@MuhaddithDotOrg Shaykh Albanee has been praised and was held in high esteem by the following scholars, Shaykh Muhammad Ibn Saalih al-Uthaymeen, Shaykh Abdul-Muhsin al-Abbaad, Shaykh Muhammad al-Ameen ash-Shinqeeti, Shaykh Abdullaah al-`Ubailaan, Shaykh Muhammad bin Ibraheem Aal ash-Shaykh, Shaykh Muqbil al-Waadi`i and Shaykh Saalih bin `Abd al-`Azeez bin Muhammad Aal ash-Shaykh. If there is any doubt in your mind contact the scholars who are alive today concerning this noble shaykh-Part 2
wow...wahhabi's praising other wahabbis, big shocker. What about the 90% Sunni Muslim Majority Scholars of the 4 mathaheb?
Anyway, if you admit that he is not a great muhaddith, then you can more easily explain away his many mistakes. However, your insistence that he did know all of the hadiths that we showed in the video is actually a very big insult from you against Albani that he hid them on purpose.
@islamophobia4dummies These scholars are from the best of the ummah and you label them wahhabi's, can you even tell me what that term means, these scholars are from Ahlus sunnah wal jammah and they are known to the people and all praises are to Allah your insults do not harm them, rather they only harm yourself. There is no human who makes mistakes except the prophet of Allah (peace be upon him) so the status of Shaykh Albanee is known amongst the muslims he is a noble scholar.
@islamophobia4dummies But Abdul Wahab is the name of his farther the shaykh's name is Muhammad, and what is your definition of tawassul then? As for the claims in the video Shaykh Albanee is free of them and your claim is ludicrous, you don't know 90% of muslims so how do you know how they feel, tell me which survey you carried out to gather these statistics?
Just as we call followers of Imam Ahmed Ibn HANBAL as "Hanbali", there is nothing wrong with identifying the followers of Mohamad Ibn AbdulWAHAB as "WAHHABI".
We cannot call you "Abdulwahhabis". because Ibn Abdulwahhab's sheikh AND father (ie, Abdulwahab) was AGAINST Mohamad Ibn Abdulwahab. His own brother was also against him, so we can't call you "Ibn Abdulwahhabi's" either.
Anyway, the salafi scholar "Al Sheikh" says that you should be proud to call yourself "Wahhabi".
@islamophobia4dummies Apart form one of the names of Allah is Wahab and how are we followers of him, we follow the Prophet (peace be upon him) and provide a reference to your claim, and maybe you could answer my previous questions
the Quran says "كُونُواْ رَبَّانِيِّينَ" so it is not haram to call the followers of Ibn Abdulwahab as "Wahhabis", and especially when Al Sheikh along with many "salafi" scholars consider it a compliment and a testament that they follow his "school". I am not using this term to insult you, so please do not take it that way. It is the earliest known person who presented the claim that tawassul is shirk.
also, you are mistaken to complain about being called "Wahhabi" for being a follower of Mohamad Ibn Abdulwahhab. You wrote "on of the names of Allah is wahab"...that is incorrect, one of the names of Allah is AL-Wahhab. And another one of the names of Allah is "AL-Malik", yet you don't complain about MALKEEs calling themselves this.
As for all of your previous questions, they have been answered, so please read my replies carefully, and if you are still confused, send me another PM.
you wrote"As for the claims in the video Shaykh Albanee is free of them":
Please tell me which of the evidence we provided and authentic hadith (of Aisha and the 3 Khulafa al Rashideen) are incorrect? Albani made a claim in his book that is proven wrong according to his own evidence and the more authentic hadiths.
As for Albani's status outside the Wahhabi circle, you are clearly misinformed. Insha Allah, we will dedicate an entire video to show Muslims scholars who debunked him.
@MuhaddithDotOrg And if Shaykh Bin Baaz is not a reference for islamic knowledge then who is left for us, the vast number of students he left behind will attest to his knowledge of Islam, He was a scholar who promoted the good and prevented the vice, if you are in doubt to this matter contact the permanent committee who will no doubt prove as witnesses for his good character, his humility, his knowledge of Islam and other than this-Part 2
the rest of the Islamic scholars in all the Muslim countries that have much more credibility, authority, recognition, chain of authority, and no bid'a of objecting to tawassul whatsoever and expelling Muslims from Islam for tawassul like Ibn Abdulwahab.
And the funny thing, is that Ibn Baz does this while simultaneously allowing the American armies into the arabian penninsula, which even ibn Uthaimeen disagrees with totally.
Ibn Baz making this statement only goes to reduce the credibility of Ibn Baz himself.
And it is IMPOSSIBLE for a true muhaddith to make the "mistakes" pointed out in this video, of CLAIMING the tashahhud was changed, and not knowing that 2 of Khulfa2 al rashideen TAUGHT the original tashahhud FROM THE PULPIT.
Before receiving the Revelation of Islam, Christian and Jewish religions existed around Muhammad (PBUH), as well as idol worshipping.
He did not follow any of these, he abstained and maintained the haneefa "method" (remnants from Abrahamic times), pivoting mainly around the acceptance of our Creator Allah, and the refusal to worship idols.
@MuhaddithDotOrg as far as i know through the books he was following the " religion of Ibrahim" thats why most of the Muslim mosques has the sign of the "moon" and if its not that then please explain why the have the sign of moon on their mosques? even the one in Madina which is main one.. peace
Yes the remnants of the religion of Ibrahim is called "haneefiyyah". Linguistically it means turning away from false religions.
The moon is the declaration that we follow the Lunar calendar, that the Muslim months are calculated based on the moon (not the sun), among which are the months holy to us such as Ramadan and Zhul Hijjah, Muharram... These occasions mean a lot to us, thus the moon became our symbol as opposed to forbidden statues, idols, the christian cross, or whatever.
the Salfia/Wahabia nowadays are following Ibn Taymiah as long as he agrees with Albany, and they follow Albany as long as he agrees with Ibn Baz which disagrees many things with Ibn Taymiah.
and btw they are not all same, and they disagree with each other.
also most of them disagree with Ibn Alqayem with what he said in his book "AlRouh" where he confirmed that the Prophet Mohamad (pbuh) can't be considered as just a dead person, but they insist on that matter!.
You are doing something sneaky here, when they go to the grave, and say Assaalmu alaika/kum on the Prophet this is one thing, but the companions didnt go about and say, Ya Rasulula SAWS, give me something. The prophet didnt teach this in most sayings or actions, so there is no reason to resort to it for wanting something. Already you should know that scholars have stated both are permissible in prayer. Taking Dr.Phillips as THE resource for all "salafi" scholars is well..its not being just too
1- Prophet Muhammad (pbuh) TAUGHT the tawassul prayer
2- The COMPANION Uthman Ibn Hunayf TAUGHT the tawassul prayer
3- The 4 Mujtahideen and mathaheb are in unanimous consensus that tawassul is good (yahsun).
4- At least we can FINALLY agree (you and us) that Bilal Philips is NOT "THE" resource for all "salafi" scholars, so I guess we are uniting the Ummah after all !
Since, it's obvious that this does not nullify one's prayer (email any scholar from the madhadib or visit their websites where this question has already been answered as both forms being ok), than what really is the point of this video?
Ibn Baz said something contrary to what you claim about "salafis". He said, "What is prescribed is to say that which the Prophet taught to the Sahaba. He taught them to say: “al-salaamu ‘alayka ayyuha’l-nabiyyu wa rahmat-Allahi wa barakaatuhu (during tashahhud).
the point of this video is to show that CONTRARY to Bilal Philips claim, saying "YA RASULLULLAH" and speaking to Prophet Muhammad in any way whatsoever inside and outside the prayer is NOT "worship" EVER...not through tawassul, not in the tashahhud, NEVER.
Furthermore, this video shows the lengths that SOME Salafis will go to defend their opinions.
Finally, Ibn Uthaimeen ALSO disagrees with Albani about tashahhud.
SO, The Salafi methodology leads to a lot of contradictions.
ALSO, we are NOT the ones making the false claim that "the companions" CHANGED the tashahhud by using weak hadiths and ignoring the Khulafa' al Rahsideen.
I really don't know how this video proves tawwasul with the dead. Your title contradicts with what you said @ 12:18 proving both forms are permissible. Very misleading @ 13:47, if you read the rest of the quote by ibn Hajar, he states, "However, the narration of Abu Ma'mar is (i.e same hadith in Bukhari Volume 8, Book 74, Number 281) is more authentic..." Which makes what you said @ 14:19 completely erroneous.
1- we provided the hadith of the COMPANION Uthman ibn Hunayf, and IMAM al Nawawi, both teaching TAWASSUL
2- we did not deny that both forms are permissible, but the 4 mujtahideen and Muslims for 14 centuries follow the PROPER methodology of the Sunnah of the Prophet & Khulafa al Rashideen
3- Ibn Hajar is referring to Ibn Masood's original hadith from Bukhari (where Ibn Masood says "we used to") as being more authentic than this one (where Ibn Masood says "this is how we are taught").
@SFAvfx The proof of tawassul is in other videos. Tis video exposes the twisting that some 'scholars' do to fit their views. If you think the prophet can't hear us than you've got a serious aqida issue, as the soul is eternal : "And do not speak of those who are slain in Allah's way as dead; nay (they are) alive, but you do not perceive." Quran 2.154
Also, this isn't personal, but what is with the beard? According to all the 4 Imams, who you quote it is FARD to keep a beard of atleast one fist, so why don't you? The same can be said about your headgear, all of your hair should be covered, but there is a little poking out.
This is by no means a personal attack, and I apologise if the discrepancies I pointed out are a result of a medical problem (skin irritation) etc.
WE request U to quote that according to the 4 mazhahib the length of one fist is fard. Please give us the proof (must be easy), & we'll make a video apologizing.
After (& only after) u fail, we'll provide quotations inshallah, but we want U 1st to research & benefit, not just "shoot from the hip".
This is a deja: That people
1- SELECT 1 opinion from many
2- Force others to that opinion by claiming "this is the only opinion available" (this is not good Islamic comportment).
As for the beard, subhanallah, don't you know of people who were created by Allah without a full beard?
Myself, & the speaker (my son) are such people!
Following minimal Islamic ethics of "husn zhann" can help U a lot in life, and would have speared you the mistake U are doing here: when you see something, you immediately jump to the worst suspicious interpretation. Subhanallaah, this is characteristic of Salafi influence, & lack of tazkiyah that Allah mentioned in the Quran.
@MuhaddithDotOrg Here is the evidence regarding the beard: watch?v=JTmFoYeozLc
I already iterated that my comment were not meant as a personal attack, so please don't assume it was ill intentioned, especially after I explicitly stated it wasn't. Like you said, don't jump to conclusions.
This is something you brothers have done in regard to Bilal Philips' mistake. You pointed his mistake of "Ayuharasool" out more than once, and spoke of his scholarship in a demeaning and derogatory manner.
1- We ask you to cite your references here, not to send us to any other video, please.
Tip: According to 1 mazh-hab, growing the beard is a Sunnah not an obligation. So research & you will know.
2- We have been very kind (not derogatory) with B.P. VIEWING HIS ATTITUDE with respect to people who teach tawassul (among them is a companion, etc... review our video).
It keeps boiling down to: BP can say what he wants, implying shirk etc, and we must SHUT UP and not explain the truth.
@MuhaddithDotOrg I implore you watch the video, the speaker cites references from scholars and books from all 4 Madaahib. Please leave your foregone conclusions behind you when you watch the video. I have already been accused by yourselves of being judgmental, even though I distanced myself from ill intentions.
Sorry to tell you, but you are falsely accusing me of doing something HARAM, and this is a serious issue:
1- the minimum requirement to keep a beard is to grow the hair on the chin
2- trimming the beard (like me, and like Bilal Philips) to less than a fist-full is makrooh according to the Shafi'i school (Imam Nawawi, Ibn Hajar, etc)
3- My moustache is closer to the sunnah than Bilal Philips, as I do shave it, as per the hadith "احفوا الشوارب واعفوا عن اللحى"
Again another divisive video on an isolated issue, which bears little weight in the affairs of the common Muslim. Clearly you have an agenda, although I agree with you on the Tashahudd, but bear in mind that the Tashahudd is a recollection of the incident in which Allah said to the Prophet "Peace be upon you" (during Mi'raj), and we by saying that are only recollecting the conversation, and are in no way doing "WASEELA", as you claim.
You provided no evidence of Sahaba saying "ya rasoolullah"
TO UPHOLD THE TRUTH by citing solid references according to the Salaf al Salih, including The Companions (R) and 4 Mujtahideen. Not blindly following & eulogizing persons such as Ibn Taymiyyah and BP, no matter how wrong they are. Not everything they say is wrong; our "agenda" is to correct mistakes that they did.
2- IF the issue is so TRIVIAL to you, why not object against those who STARTED IT?
Instead, if we try to answer, you want us to "shut up"?
he is not salafi!! and you should contact him personally and you have the nerve!!
TAHSIYN 17 hours ago
So 44 people think the entire Muslim Ummah are "kaafir" for saying "Peace be upon you O Prophet"
ByChoiceMuslim 1 week ago
Jazak'Allah Khair for your hard work! This is exactly what we need! So many young unsuspecting brothers are being misled by the Salafi preachers (may Allah be pleased with their good and guide them where they err), so such clarifications are essential!
EnjoiningKnowlege 1 month ago
وهناك فرق عزيزي بين مايعلمه الرسول للصحابه و ما يخصه لمن يحتاجه في شيء فمثلا الاعمى اللذي اتى يطلب الرسول الدعاء له ان الله يشفيه فقد علمه الرسول بدعاء خصه به وهو حي يرزق وصيغة الدعاء كانت يا الله بحق نبيك لم يات احد بعد وفاته يناجي الرسول او يطلب من الرسول ان يشفيه او يدعو له بالرزق فهنا تكون الاشكاليه لان الرسول قد توفى ومع الرفيق الاعلى اسال الله ان يجمعنا به
0569991991 2 months ago in playlist مزيد من مقاطع الفيديو من MuhaddithDotOrg
السلام عليكم ورحمة الله وبركاته
عزيزي اولا انا احبك بالله لجميع مقاطعك وان كنت اختلف معك في طريقة طرح هذا الفديو او محاولة تشويه الاخ بلال حتى وان اخطء
واحب ان اشاركك في النقاش واطرح عليك سؤال واتمنى الاجابه عليه ايمكن لنا كمسلمين ان ناخذ جزء من ايه او حديث ونبني عليه معتقد اسلامي بدون قرائة الايه كامله او الحديث كامل ؟
كذلك التحيات او التشهد فلايجوز لنا عزيزي ان ناخذ جزئية السلام عليك ايها النبي ونترك البقيه فماذا يقع بعدها ؟
السلام علينا وعلى عباد الله الصالحين هل معناته نتوسل بعباد الله؟
0569991991 2 months ago in playlist مزيد من مقاطع الفيديو من MuhaddithDotOrg
MuhaddithDotOrg: Forgive me if this comment sounds like a rant but I do have some questions.
2- Dr. Philips is contributing his effort to Islam as are you (For which I respect both grealty). Why does it feel that you have turned your focus on someone who is trying to spread Islam when there are enough misunderstandings and ignorance to fill countries. If that is the case which has the greater benifit? Correcting the spreading of Islam or Correcting the ignorant of Islam.
Thank you.
lazyresearcher 4 months ago
@lazyresearcher
The result of people who follow Bilal Philips is that they wrongly accuse other Muslims of shirk, which is a grave error that must be corrected to prevent the splitting of the Islamic nation which should have a higher priority than dawa.
And while our previous efforts have been focused on refuting attacks against Islam, since Bilal Philips is himself attacking Islamic scholars and the majority of the Islamic nation, this also falls into the same category.
islamophobia4dummies 4 months ago
@islamophobia4dummies I don't know much about Bilal Philips. But from what I've seen, I think he's knowledgeable enough to know the difference between Nabi and Rasool, and that was a pure mistake
However, I'm glad you pointed out his mistakes about giving salam to Rasulullah (sm). It would be nice if you directly contact Bilal Philips about his contradicting speech please.
dBolotok 1 month ago
MuhaddithDotOrg: Forgive me if this comment sounds like a rant but I do have some questions.
1- For the first comment on Bilal Philips when he mentions "calling on the prophet." I could have misunderstand but my understanding from Dr. Philips was: if you ask the prophet for help and the prophet is dead then he cannot help you or that would be considered shirk. If so then I believe he is right.
lazyresearcher 4 months ago
@lazyresearcher
the people who disagree with you about asking for the Prophet's help (by praying and interceding for us after his death) include the companion Uthman ibn Hunayf, Imam Malik, and Imam Ahmed. These are among the earliest and best 3 generations, ie, the Salaf al Saleh, and we challenge anyone to quote one single person among the Salaf al Saleh who explicitly disagrees with this view.
islamophobia4dummies 4 months ago
sunna explains in detail for example zam zam and the story behind with Ismail as and Hagar ra , so we see there is a bridge to sunna in perfect system wehn we leave the system and use the sunna where Koran has been clear that there is nothing more to be explained not only the aspect metnioned but caried out in detail, then still people ask the sunna to separately form new laws apart from the Koran! This is the main problem we have.
SeashoreaTRUTH11 6 months ago
@SeashoreaTRUTH11
as I said before, your entire premise of relying on the Quran "only" is refuted by the Quran itself:
16:44 {...that you (ie, Prophet Muhammad) may MAKE CLEAR to men what has been revealed to them}
4: 59 {Obey Allah and obey the Messenger and those of you who are in authority. (And) if you differ in anything amongst yourselves, refer it to Allah and His Messenger}
And even such a basic thing such as how to pray is not explicitly described in the Quran.
islamophobia4dummies 6 months ago
Koran mention prayer, sunna explains detail, Koran mentions safa marwa- sunna explains in detail, Koran mentions hajj and mentions the stations , sunna in detail, Koran mentions wudu complete, sunna explains details, Koran mentions do not come near the women in menstration, sunna explain detail, Koran mentions funeral, sunna explains in detail, washing the dead body, Koran mentions supplications, sunna the details, Koran mentions purity, sunna explains circumcision, Koran mentions signs of mekka
SeashoreaTRUTH11 6 months ago
@SeashoreaTRUTH11
Yes we want to return to the Quran & Sunnah ACCORDING TO THE MOST QUALIFIED UNDERSTANDING (e.g. the 4 mujtahideen) NOT ACCORDING DEFICIENT BOASTFUL CLAIMS OF OTHERS. THIS IS SO CLEAR YET U REFUSE IT.
The Prophet PBUH said: "I was given the quran, and similar to it, with it"
Sayyidina ali (R) and Sayyidina Umran Ibn HuSSain (& other companions) ridiculed people who said "all we need is the Quran.
Please leave your blind fanaticism (ta3assub a3ma) & study such history and info.
MuhaddithDotOrg 6 months ago
part 3 however the madhabs disputed on this , one say haram one say not etc. and this is our problem we have in Islam a strict clear guideline and we have the best explanation for the Koran and beating the one who make zina by 100 lashes its explanation is not stoning to death- I just want everyone to bring up the Koran to the supreme and really not using ahadeeth fpr forming new laws which contradict the Koran, hope you understand my point.
SeashoreaTRUTH11 6 months ago
@SeashoreaTRUTH11
you are asking for something that is impossible...to have ONLY 1 correct answer to all questions. All of the mathaheb's opinions are taken and accepted, and we have the ability to choose among them what to do with no extremism of 1 opinion over another. As the original example, these guys attacking me because my beard is not to their preference is unislamic. You are ending up doing the same thing...trying to force 1 interpretation, when many can be acceptable.
islamophobia4dummies 6 months ago
@islamophobia4dummies no not at all..I am only trying to say refer to the Sunna , the Koran gives us a way to Sunna in mentioning things but not giving further explanation and leaving this out to be explained by the prophet sas, for example safa and marwa is mentioned in Koran but not the background which is explained in sunna or prayer is mentioned but no described left out and explained in sunna, hajj mentioned for example the devil will be stoned prophecy by god and we see effect in sunna
SeashoreaTRUTH11 6 months ago
I dearly challenge everyone here to show me one verse in Koran that we have to follow the companions of Muhammad sas, where do you find this verse timeless, I tell you what I follow you find it so clear in Koran but may be you do not want it- this refers to everyone here: read 6:152 ff- if you read in these verses it is forbidden to shave beard, I will wear it as long as possible, pls. stop disputing where the Koran does not leave a shadow of doubt, look where it leads....
SeashoreaTRUTH11 6 months ago
@SeashoreaTRUTH11
The Quran tells us to follow Prophet Muhammad:
"We have revealed to you the Reminder that you may MAKE CLEAR to men what has been revealed to them, and that haply they may reflect." 16:44
and Prophet Muhammad told us to follow his Sunnah and that of the Khulafa al Rashideen, and Prophet Muhammad also described the best 3 generations (the Companions, the Tabi'in and Tabi' al Tabi'in).
But regarding the beard, shaving the beard is makruh according to many Shafi'i scholars.
islamophobia4dummies 6 months ago
@islamophobia4dummies you bring it to the point, follow the prophet sas, and the prophet sas followed the Koran so must do everyone, follow the Koran, and we are not allowed to form new laws, but when we see the Koran did not explicitely forbid something we must see if the thing is good or bad because the Koran teaches us the good things are allowed, so we must always examine espcially in modern times, therefore we follow the Koran and the best understanding resulting from this in the sunna
SeashoreaTRUTH11 6 months ago
part 2: but it is of vital importance to follow the Koran, for example donkey it is said is haram and compare 6:146 so we see we are not allowed to forbid what the Koran did not forbid and for the new things in modern times we must always check if it is good or bad, the Koran teaches us this with alcool, alcool has good and bad but the bad exceeds , this is example of evaluation, so we can say eating Gorilla is not forbidden!!! but if it causes health harm etc. it is not allowed.
SeashoreaTRUTH11 6 months ago
part 2 the Koran gives clear way to sunna by mentioning something without giving background but surely every reader wants to know and thus we can see Allah swt intention to give a role for the sunna but we shall not refer to sunna where Koran is 100 % clear and leaves nothing out to be further explained, the sunna has its place and the Koran gives bridge to it this is the perfect system in our religion while we went over to only ask the sunna even what the Koran explained in detail
SeashoreaTRUTH11 6 months ago
why when ahadeeth have two positions und uncertitude indeed you are not then referring back to the Koran, only invoke Allah swt is of most vital importance to avoid the glimpse of shirk since this sin is so big it is better to rely here on the clear words from Koran and never forget, it can be you say, the prophet said and rely on sahih hadith but still the prophet sas did not say this- so we have the Koran as guidance. Blessed Ramadan.
SeashoreaTRUTH11 6 months ago
@SeashoreaTRUTH11
1- the hadiths are only contradictory for salafis, but not for the 4 mathaheb. the fact is that the rain prayer was a group supplication needing an imam
2- Please do not put words in our mouth.
You wrote "only invoke Allah"...do you know that Salafis permit tawassul through the living...so why don't you tell Bilal Philips and Salafis to stop shirk and "only invoke Allah".
That is the problem with these false premises that are confusing people.
islamophobia4dummies 6 months ago
@islamophobia4dummies der brother to greet the prophet directly today is not shirk I did not say this, as we also greet the angels, this is form of respect no invovation, if we ask for help we only ask Allah swt, if we say, oh Allah swt help me, see I love the prophet Muhammad sas, what is the problem it is you give humble effort to "convince" Allah swt as you are helpless so long no one ask Muhammad sas for help, no problem at all, yes it is wrong to ask the living ones,
SeashoreaTRUTH11 6 months ago
for help, we ask the livong ones to ask Allah swt for forgiveness if we had dispute with them because how can we ask human for forgiveness, so when we have dispute we ask the one we had dispute with oh pray for me for forgiveness as Youssef brother did in relation to Ayoub as in Koran. So brother it is only important to observe this, some people shout out ya rasulah when something terrible happens, as if asking him for help or comfort and this is strictly forbidden. May Allah swt guard us.
SeashoreaTRUTH11 6 months ago
@lilblitz
according to the Shafi'i math-hab, the minimum requirement for the beard is the hair on the chin.
please take your extremism elsewhere...besides, I do not see your beard, so according to your own logic, your words are rejected.
islamophobia4dummies 6 months ago
@islamophobia4dummies since in Koran no beard is mentioned at all, it is an act which is not imperative as Allah swt did not make it in Koran imperative, read pls. brother 6:146 this applied to everyone who wants to make imperative what is not made in Koran imperative, the Koran has all what we need to enter paradise , we shall not search of other law sources then Koran and the hadeeth we need for explaining the Koran not for having new strict laws, we would have unity if we would observe this.
SeashoreaTRUTH11 6 months ago
@lilblitz
We did not accuse Ibn Taymiyyah of bid'a...it was Sheikh ul Islam Imam al Sibki that declared Ibn Taymiyyah's bid'a, which was quoted by many Islamic scholars throughout the centuries.
A bid'a is a new innovation introduced in the religion, & prior to Ibn Taymiyyah, Imam Ahmed & Imam al Nawawi taught tawassul, among others, & for 650 years, not a single Muslim scholar ever objected to tawassul through the Prophet (pbuh). Therefore, Ibn Taymiyyah;s objection is a bid'a by definition.
islamophobia4dummies 6 months ago
Comment removed
lilblitz 6 months ago
If you want to give islamic sermons at least have a beard so you don't look like a deviant with your goatee also salafi means to follow the salaf meaning the early generations so the whole principle of it is to eradicate bidah and it seems only people who call for bidah have something to say about ''salafis''
lilblitz 6 months ago
@lilblitz - 1
Your comment shows a SOILED heart indeed:
That's how Allah created his beard (it is not a self chosen "goatie").
Among all possibilities, U chose the one with the most bad-faith (the opposite of basic Islamic morals of
husn zhann).
We accept that IF IT WAS YOU,
then YOU WOULD HAVE ACTED THIS WAY IN DISAGREEMENT WITH THE SUNNAH.
WE UNDERSTAND YES THAN YOU CANNOT IMAGINE
THAT A GOOD INTENTION CAN EXIST IN SUCH A SITUATION,
BUT *** WE ARE NOT YOU ***.
MuhaddithDotOrg 6 months ago
@lilblitz - 2
IT IS A SHAME TO FIND SUCH BLACK HEARTS AMONG MUSLIMS,
IT IS A DISGRACE TO YOUR GROUP,
THAT PEOPLE WITH SUCH BAD FAITH
ARE THE ONES CLAIMING TO BE "SALAFIS".
You have not even smelled the smell of al salaf al salih:
If you did, you would NOT have committed this basic ugly mistake.
MuhaddithDotOrg 6 months ago
@lilblitz - 3
& if like some other fanatic salafis in this comment section,
you object about THE LENGTH OF HIS BEARD:
1- It IS ACCEPTABLE according to mujtahideen (who obtained unanimous consensus of the nation, as qualified to provide opinions) unlike ignorant salafi-claimers.
2- The PREFERRED length of the beard is 1 handful,
but ACCORDING TO YOU (not to us) Bilal Philips is DEVIANT by excellence,
yet you insist to defend him AT ALL COSTS.
This is the ultimate BLIND FANATICISM (ta3assub a3ma).
MuhaddithDotOrg 6 months ago
@lilblitz - 4
So ACCORDING TO YOUR SUPERFICIAL CRITERIA (measuring the trustworthiness of a person by the surface area of his beard !),
Bilal Philips, being such a "deviant" (quoting you) concerning because of the DEFICIENT length of his beard,
he THEREFORE "should not give sermons".
MuhaddithDotOrg 6 months ago
@lilblitz - 5
But according to us, WE R NOT TAKEN BY SUPERFICIALITIES (like U R):
WE AGREE HE SHOULD NOT GIVE SERMONS,
but it is because of his mistakes NOT WORTHY OF A FIRST GRADE STUDENT
(Assalamu alaika ayyuha-l RASOOL !!!),
& because of his rejected ugly bid3ahs of, among others,
making similitudes to Allah
& ascribing LOCATION to Allah:
UP in the north pole is DOWN in the south pole! THIS IS OUR CHALLENGE TO ALL.
How do U SALAFI-PRETENDERS hope to have ONE INTELLIGENT convert this century?!
MuhaddithDotOrg 6 months ago
@MuhaddithDotOrg Can I ask you one question do you pray to dead people?? You sound like the guys who do they always complain about people following the salif because they appose mushriks and Allah is above the 7th heaven on his Throne Golry be to him how can people say He swt is everywhere? Do you ascribe Allah to be in filthy places what a evil thing to say Golry be to Him above that
lilblitz 6 months ago
@lilblitz
U should stop consuming whatever you took before writing this comment of yours:
1- We obviously do not pray to dead people, we pray only to Allah. Salafi-pretenders will see us clinging to their throats inshallah in the hereafter, for this irresponsible accusation.
2- U have un-Islamic guts & immoral daring 2 accuse us of saying "Allah is everywhere".
Wake up:
Allah CREATED all matter, HE DOESN'T SHARE ANY ATTRIBUTE W HIS CREATION.
If he was UP for you, He would be DOWN for others!!!
MuhaddithDotOrg 6 months ago
@MuhaddithDotOrg bilal philips leaves his beard some people beard will not grow to a fist length and bottom line he looks like a muslim if you are going to call sheiks of islam doers of bidah and resemble the mushrikeen in appearance obviously people are going to laugh at you
lilblitz 6 months ago
@MuhaddithDotOrg firstly I am not salafi secondly the majority view is at least one fist length is obligotory, I do not have a fist length beard but at least I admit I am wrong for it instead of trying to find loopholes and holding weird opinions not supported by the majority, devient by excellence?? what does that mean? You people cant get anything right I follow the messenger of Allah sws and stick to the sound opinions held by his companions as he sws commanded us to follow their sunnah
lilblitz 6 months ago
@lilblitz
last time I checked, this was not a video about beards, and we made no claims about beards in this video.
also, your criticism of my beard is rejected by Muslim scholars, as I am 100% in line with the shafi'i math-hab.
Where is your criticism of Bilal Philips that his beard is not long enough?
And again, according to your own criteria, if you reject our words since my beard is not long enough (or because I do not grow hair on my cheeks), then your argument is false for the same reason
islamophobia4dummies 6 months ago
@lilblitz
The "majority" view means there are OTHER views and you are too UNQUALIFIED to dare dictate your OWN SELECTION upon other Muslims.
This is the problem with "Salafi-pretenders".
Despite your false claims of not being a salafi, there are no other explanations for your blind fanaticism: You are not only a "Salafi-false-pretender", we suspect deeply that you are an utter liar. Sorry that you forced us to call you on it.
You "stick" only to your own opinion, no matter how wrong it is.
MuhaddithDotOrg 6 months ago
@lilblitz sorry in time of Ramadan you wrote a very bad word, can you look into his heart, see you reduce your sight to the beard, you can be easily affected by hypocrites, this is reason the agents from Mossad had easy game to deceive muslims by false agents, Muslims thought they are with them because of ..the beard, never judge in terms Allah swt did not teach us to judge- no verse in the Koran mentions we can recognize a muslim with the help of beard or that it is precondition to preach
SeashoreaTRUTH11 6 months ago
Islam is easy , believe in God ,love, faithful, that is it, do not make complicated so others never imbrace it
brd1243 6 months ago
@MuhaddithDotOr
ive just checked your channel and i realised that u actually support Harun Yahya, how can u support such a person whose aqeedah is so wrong, and he said Allah is everywhere so Allah is even in human, therefore its not point worshipping external being, we can just worship ourself. shame on u for supporting such people with wrong aqeedah. knowing the truth, u still hide it.
Naive991 6 months ago
@Naive991
First of all, we don't accept "new notions" of Aqeedah, whether from BILAL PHILIPS or Haryn Yahya.
But in terms of Harun Yahya: Indeed we heard this accusation against him in a video, which was precisely REFUTING that accusation.
Minimal honesty REQUIRES that U to provide yr source for this accusation.
So, can U provide explicit evidence supporting yr claim that "Harun Yahya...said Allah is everywhere"?
Or R we to accept that your ethics R based on making irresponsible accusations?
MuhaddithDotOrg 6 months ago
MuhaddithDotOrg 6 months ago
cut the crap out, whatever bilal phillip is saying is 100% right
Naive991 6 months ago
@Naive991
Yes brother:
Once you review the proofs presented in our video,
leaving your personal opinion aside,
then you will know that when you "CUT THE C---" out of Bilal Philips' words,
THEN WHAT HE IS SAYING WILL BE 100% RIGHT.
MuhaddithDotOrg 6 months ago
@MuhaddithDotOrg
u sufi r same, presenting fake evidence all the time. giving references to weak Hadiths and in the video u never really gave a real reply to bilal phillips comments on saying ya muhammad. if u r correct then tell me y did the sahaba didnt say ya muhammad after prophets death. and what about all the hadiths
Naive991 6 months ago
@Naive991
please pay closer attention to the video...we presented ample evidence of hadiths that the companions did say "...ya rasullullah..." after the Prophet's death.
Recheck the video between 3:08 to 3:59, and pay special note to the annotation starting at 3:49
islamophobia4dummies 6 months ago
@Naive991
furthermore, we challenge you to provide evidence against EVEN ONE hadith we cited that it is weak, this is absolutely a false statement from your side. It is very convenient of you to accuse others of citing weak hadiths whenever the Prophet's words (pbuh) do not support your ideology.
islamophobia4dummies 6 months ago
@islamophobia4dummies
no thats not true, i honestly want to follow the straight path of prophet S.A.W. i dont wanna support any sectarian group. anyway its no point u challenging me when u havent answered my question. am asking u y r there so many hadiths stating that the followers of prophet stopped saying ya muhammad in namaz, in tashhud after his death and instead they said peace be on the messenger. yyyy????? did they change that.
Naive991 6 months ago
@Naive991
we provided evidence in the video that BOTH the Khalifa Abu Bakr AND the Khalifa Umar taught the tashahhud "ON THE PULPIT" as being "...assalaamu ALAIKA...".
Which 100% refutes Bilal Philips claim that saying "ya rasullullah" is shirk,
islamophobia4dummies 6 months ago
@islamophobia4dummies
ive checked the video link that u gave me. i agree that harun yahya as done some good work, but he has certainly supported that allah is everywhere and this is not allegation, this is truth about him, his books r published in turkey, READ HIS BOOKS. also whenever someone points something in your sheikhs, u start to say that its allegation. u deny the truth very qucikly and u r too quick to point at others.
Naive991 6 months ago
@Naive991
it is clear to me that this statement "Allah is everywhere" was stated Bilal Philips in making his accusations against other Muslims, where he never provided a quote, reference or page number.
This is in stark contrast to when Bilal Philips makes claims about Christians or Shia, he quotes specific words in specific books, and we are telling you that any accusation against another Muslim requires at least that much evidence.
As for Harun Yahya, we do not consider him a "Sheikh".
islamophobia4dummies 6 months ago
@Naive991 U accused us of "presenting fake evidence... giving references to weak hadiths".
It's IMMORAL (& un-Islamic) 2 make NON-SUPPORTED accusations.
U NEED 2 CHANGE YR "AFFILIATION" in order 2 get rid of such un-Islamic features.
We demand now (& inshallah will insist in the hereafter) that U show whatever honesty you may have, by CITING which hadiths are "fake", and which are "weak". Plz cite scholars that said so, not your personal opinion: opinions not supported by scholars R worthless.
MuhaddithDotOrg 6 months ago
One more proof for the Salafis who say that calling out Ya Muhammed is worship to Muhammed SAW. Woe to you all salafis for it is proven authentic even by Salafi Albani for the hadith reported by Imam Abu Ya'la that Issa AS will descent and call out Ya Muhammed SAW for which our Prophet SAW will reply back:
abdulbasith77 6 months ago
والذي نفس أبي القاسم بيده لينزلن عيسى ابن مريم إمامأ مقسطا ، وحكما عدلا ، فليكسرن الصليب ، وليقتلن الخنزير،
وليصلحن ذات البين ، وليذهبن الشحناء ، وليعرضن عليه المال فلا يقبله ، ثم لئن قام على قبري فقال : يا محمد ، لأجبته
abdulbasith77 6 months ago
أخرجه أبو يعلى في " مسنده " : حدثنا أحمد بن عيسى : ابن وهب عن أبي صخر أن سعيد المقبري أخبره أنه سمع أبا هريرة يقول : سمعت رسول الله صل الله عليه وسلم : فذكره . قلت : وهذا إسناد جيد رجاله كلهم ثقات رجال الشيخين ، غير أبي صخروهو حميد بن زياد الخراط . فمن رجال مسلم وحده
What a pity on all you salafis for you have even blamed Issa AS for worshipping other than Allah!!!!! “
abdulbasith77 6 months ago
MuhaddithDotOrg 6 months ago
Abu Bakr RA called on the Prophet SAW and in Bilal's words this is shirk to call the Prophet SAW. Imam Gazzali RA reports the same hadith with an extension wherein Abu Bakr RA requests the Prophet not to forget us. All you salafis are you with the Sahabas and the Imams or are youll still justifying this stupid stand. One more logical ? If i call out and seek help from a deaf person knowingly that he cannot listen, is it shirk?? What an idiotic stand??
abdulbasith77 6 months ago
@abdulbasith77
Jazakumullahu khairan brother.
But we are all almost sure that the salafis prefer their own opinion, over any hadeeth or Aayah.
MuhaddithDotOrg 6 months ago
فَدَخَلَ الْمَسْجِدَ فَلَمْ يُكَلِّمْ النَّاسَ حَتَّى دَخَلَ عَلَى عَائِشَةَ رَضِيَ اللَّهُ عَنْهَا فَتَيَمَّمَ النَّبِيَّ صَلَّى اللَّهُ عَلَيْهِ وَسَلَّمَ وَهُوَ مُسَجًّى بِبُرْدِ حِبَرَةٍ فَكَشَفَ عَنْ وَجْهِهِ ثُمَّ أَكَبَّ عَلَيْهِ فَقَبَّلَهُ ثُمَّ بَكَى فَقَالَ بِأَبِي أَنْتَ يَا نَبِيَّ اللَّهِ لَا يَجْمَعُ اللَّهُ عَلَيْكَ مَوْتَتَيْنِ أَمَّا الْمَوْتَةُ الَّتِي كُتِبَتْ عَلَيْكَ فَقَدْ مُتَّهَا
abdulbasith77 6 months ago
@abdulbasith77
Jazak Allah Khair brother... that is a great one, which we have added as an annotation starting at 3:50, along with the Prophet (pbuh) saying "YA MUSA" in the Isra wal Miraj (also from Bukhari)
islamophobia4dummies 6 months ago
This bilal philips has he studied even Bukhari? Who was the first to call our Prophet SAW??? It was Abu Bakr RA as mentioned in the hadith below:
أَخْبَرَنِي أَبُو سَلَمَةَ أَنَّ عَائِشَةَ رَضِيَ اللَّهُ عَنْهَا زَوْجَ النَّبِيِّ صَلَّى اللَّهُ عَلَيْهِ وَسَلَّمَ أَخْبَرَتْهُ قَالَتْ أَقْبَلَ أَبُو بَكْرٍ رَضِيَ اللَّهُ عَنْهُ عَلَى فَرَسِهِ مِنْ مَسْكَنِهِ بِالسُّنْحِ حَتَّى نَزَلَ
abdulbasith77 6 months ago
@UT5000
the companion Uthman Ibn Hunayf is exponentially more qualified to teach the tawassul du'a after the death of the Prophet. The distinction of asking Allah vs asking the Prophet is from Ibn Taymiyyah, & NOT FROM THE PROPHET or the companions (ie, bid'a).
So I refer you to the same verse you quoted: "This day I have perfected for you your relgion". On THAT DAY, the Prophet did NOT say to stop tawassul through him after his death, NOR did he say to NEVER ask him for his intermediation.
islamophobia4dummies 7 months ago
Anything umar bint Kittab May Allah be pleased with him taught was just a revival of teh Sunnah during the Propeht's peace and blessings eb upon him's lifetime.
INtercessions is ranted by Allah, ou to Allah for it like after teh Athan for example, you give Salaam to Muhamamd peace and blessings be upon him but you don't ask of him from teh unseen as he doesn't have that ability and made errors. REad Aayatul Kursi, you ask ONly of Allah, things happen only with his permission, even intercession.
UT5000 7 months ago
@UT5000
WOW, you have a lot of nerve to attack the Khalifah Umar. SHAME ON YOU.
SHAME, SHAME, SHAME ON YOU.
The sunna of the Khulafa al Rashideen is a requirement to follow according to Prophet Muhammad (pbuh) himself, so please take your silly ideas away from here.
islamophobia4dummies 7 months ago
Comment removed
UT5000 7 months ago
@islamophobia4dummies
What Attack? Reviving the Sunnah is a gud thing which is what I stated Umar Bin Kittab MAy Allah be pleased with him was doing.
UT5000 7 months ago
@UT5000 Please use ONLY ONE % of your mind: YES READ AYAT AL KURSI AGAIN, BUT TILL THE END OF IT: ILLA ILLA ILLA... EXCEPT EXCEPT EXCEPT.
Please do not tell us you follow people whose minds are so feeble (IQ=1/10),
that they can understand ONLY partial sentences,
and CANNOT ALSO comprehend the remainder: "ILLA" --- EXCEPT".
Your fanaticism (ta3assub) to persons and to your personal opinion is totally blinding.
PLEASE WAKE UP and throw this false way once and for good. IT IS BETTER FOR YOU.
MuhaddithDotOrg 6 months ago
@UT5000
what little knowledge you have... tawassul through the Prophet (pbuh) after his death does not mean that we think that the Prophet has ANY ability EXCEPT through Allah.
So do you think that LIVING PEOPLE actually have the POWER of tawassul WITHOUT ALLAH?
Whether dead or alive, EVERYTHING is WITH ALLAH'S PERMISSION.
You are committing a much more grave error, as it seems you missed the FACT that living people DO NOT HAVE ANY POWER of tawassul either, EXCEPT with Allah's permission.
islamophobia4dummies 6 months ago
@UT5000
wow, masha Allah, how have you come upon this acclaimed knowledge about the barzakh life?
is it though some "hidden knowledge" that you prohibit asking those in the barzakh?
we can send them salam, and they send us salam (which is a supplication in and of itself), but we cannot ask them other types of supplications?
please tell us your source of knowledge about the unseen, I am very interested to know.
islamophobia4dummies 6 months ago
ASking Prophet Muhammad peace adn blessings be upon him from the unseen is incorrect, he even made mistakes as he once differeed with Umar bin Kitab May Allah be pleased with him and Umar May Allah be pleased with him held the right opinion with regards to prisoner of war, he are imitaiing he X-tians as they did with ISa alehas salem asking to tehm in their prayers, this is wrong, you can Greet Prophet Muhamamd peace adn blessings be upon him but not ask of him. You ask of Allah.
UT5000 7 months ago
@UT5000
DO NOT invent "from the unseen".
Uthman Ibn Hunaif is a Companion, more qualified THAN ALL "SALAFIS" PUT TOGETHER, in matters of aqeedah, and his verdict is
قطعي وليس ظني
i.e INDICATIVE & not SPECULATIVE
while all your talks are SPECULATIVE (your own FALSE interpretations of the MINDS of Omar, etc)
& Ibn Hunaif disagrees with you about your bid3ah of naming "the unseen" and of objecting to tawassul after the Prophet's life.
Plz repent & leave aside your blind following (ta3assub a3ma).
MuhaddithDotOrg 6 months ago
@LiarDotOrg
INdictive enough.
THe Qur'an is more qualitfied, its obviouls you either misquoted Sahaba or follow post colonial liars who misquote left and right.
Just read the Ayat you are speculative liar.
6:50 Say (O Muhammad صلى الله عليه وسلم): "I don't tell you that with me are the treasures of Allah, nor (that) I know the Unseen; nor I tell you that I am an angel. I but follow what is revealed to me." Say: "Are the blind and the one who sees equal? Will you not then take thought?"
UT5000 6 months ago
@UT5000
you do really need to check your facts...you wrote "you either misquoted Sahaba ... Just read the Ayat you are a speculative liar".
It is clear that we follow the belief and hadith of Uthman ibn Hunayf, and it is you who is misquoting and following speculation.
This verse applies against you, as you are the one contradicting the companion Uthman ibn Hunayf.
Tell us, by what secret knowledge do you claim to be more knowledgeable than a companion?
islamophobia4dummies 6 months ago
@islamophobia4dummies
An OPENLY declared rightly guided Khulafa Umar bin Kittab MAy Allah be pleased with him said, we used to ask Prophet Muhammad peace and blessings be upon him to ask Allah for rain for us but now that he has passed away we ask his Uncle Al Abbas May Allah be pleased with him to ask Allah for rain for us. (paraphrasing).
watch?v=CkRMfKe1WGc&feature=watch_response
72:18 And the mosques are for Allah (Alone): so invoke not anyone along with Allah.
Repent, stop blind bidah.
UT5000 6 months ago
@UT5000
you wrote "repent, stop blind bidah" bother it is truly time for you to repent and stop your own bidah. We have given you the clear, unequivocal and authentic hadith of Uthman ibn Hunayf, yet you ignore it and accuse a companion of bid'a? Shame on you.
Regarding Khalifah Umar's action, I challenge you to find a hadith explanation (for 600 years prior to Ibn Taymiyyah) where they understood what you claim...you cannot.
The "du'a al istisqa" was a group supplication that needed an imam.
islamophobia4dummies 6 months ago
@UT5000 At last akhi a brother who understands not to call on dead people don't these mushriks realise what has their shirk benefited them has Allah swt given them more lol rather they are in low positions and they dont even see it of all the sins to risk why would they risk shirk especially when all the evidence is clear against them
lilblitz 6 months ago
Soory but you play yourself may Allah guide you.
UT5000 6 months ago
@UT5000
You have ZERO evidence from the Quran and Sunnah that quote"asking Prophet Muhammad pbuh from the unseen is incorrect". You are just regurgitating and blindly following the statements of Ibn Taymiyyah.
The minute you admit that there is a wording of tawassul through the Prophet (pbuh) that Ibn Taymiyyah accepts, then your entire claim is invalidated.
Since when is there a du'a that, if a phrase is not mentioned, then it becomes shirk?
islamophobia4dummies 6 months ago
This guy has no knowledge whatsoever and he is messing things up and he has a big major problem of everything. It is just an attack against salafis who call for worship for Allah alone swt. This youtube does not follow a correct manhaj( way)
And yes where is your beard if u want to follow the companion
tas7ee7 7 months ago
@tas7ee7
so non-salafis do not "call for worship for Allah alone"...now you claim a monopoly on tawheed?
Sorry, it is Bilal Philips who is "messing things up", as we have his exact quotes right in the video.
As for the beard, I never knew that this was a criteria for truth. Where is your beard...since I do not see your beard in this comment, then you must not be truthful?
islamophobia4dummies 7 months ago
Just more sufi propaganda. This guy doesn't even have a beard.
ayman228 7 months ago
@ayman228
you wrote "this guy doesn't even have a beard".
According to the Shafi'i mathhab, i maintain the minimum requirement of a beard, which is the hair on the chin. However, the length of my beard (and that of most "salafis" like Bilal Philips) is still considered Makruh by Imam al Shafi'i as it is not long enough.
And this is typical of your extremism of trying to force Muslims to your opinion, and force them to follow you blindly, even when there are Mujtahideen who disagree with you.
islamophobia4dummies 7 months ago
@islamophobia4dummies
There is no minimum requirement Prophet Muhammad PEace and blessings be upon him said don't touch it, that means let it grow, some peopel's beards don't grow due to genes, that is fine, but unless that is teh case, shaving the beard of anything on the JAw bone is not allowed.
"did he say never ... intermediation"
HE taught how to ask for intercession, what now we are going to do teh things he never said not to do. ISlam is clear, no that vague made up speech of yours.
UT5000 7 months ago
@UT5000
Plz don't allow readers to tell you "DO NOT BE STUPID" by saying "don't touch" (the beard) bcz then, ACCORDING TO U, U SHOULD NOT LISTEN TO ANY PERSON ON EARTH, except weirdos who, according to your grandiose invention, NEVER CUT THEIR BEARD.
I saw a western comic-looking person with a lonnnng beard & cowboy hat.
Is this the person U like to follow? He does NOT cut his beard ! (maybe only each 10 years).
The speaker gave U the mujtahideen's opinion, but U want to FORCE YOUR opinion.
MuhaddithDotOrg 6 months ago
Excellent work, brothers! May Allah bless you!
mirkhwand 7 months ago
Four mathhabbs agrre Musioc is hara, you are most proabably a sufi extremists, which is a mathnab pretending to hind behind the four, this is fake.
hbk711x 7 months ago
@hbk711x
you only show your ignorance when you wrote "you are most probably a sufi extremists, which is a mathhab pretending to ...".
Tasawwuf is recognized by IBN TAYMIYYAH and IBN ABDULWAHHAB as a valid Islamic science, and has NEVER been considered a mathhab, so please take your ignorance elsewhere.
islamophobia4dummies 7 months ago
Comment removed
UT5000 7 months ago
Did they ask for his intercesssion while eh was alive, or did they ask Allah, there is a difference between greeting and calling from the UNSEEN Which only ALLAH controls, you have proven , nothing and most probably made up those fake hadiths,
hbk711x 7 months ago
@hbk711x
Uhtman Ibn Hunayf taught the tawassul prayer AFTER the death of the Prophet.
Ibn Taymiyyah also admits that companions said "Ya Rasul Allah" when their legs fell asleep to cure it (and this is also considered tawassul).
Did you even watch the video, or do you just troll people without knowledge?
As for you claim that we used "fake hadiths", we challenge you to prove this SLANDER, and we will see you on the day of judgement for Allah to decide about this.
islamophobia4dummies 7 months ago
Comment removed
hbk711x 7 months ago
Lol Philips is a funny guy!
ZTahir07 7 months ago
Concerning Shaykh Albaanee then it is stated shaykh Ibn Baz said 'I have not seen anyone under the surface of the sky with more knowledge of the Hadeeth in our current time than the likes of the great scholar, Muhammad Naasir-ud-Deen Al-Albaanee.' He was like any other man and made mistakes and was right but he was a scholar and an expert in the field of hadith. As for bilal phillips it would be better to refer to the permanent committee and the council of senior scholars.
evilheem 7 months ago
@evilheem
Eventually, even Bin Baz couldn't stomach Albani's deviations.
Albani is a self taught person, as witnessed by Hadeeth scholars in his hometown Damascus. Even laymen there know that fact.
Numerous hadeeth scholars detailed numerous of the results of his "self-teaching", displaying unacceptable blunders, including the audacity to refuse hadeeths from Saheeh al Bukhari (accepted as authentic by Ijmaa'...). Such expert Muhaddith scholars range from India, the Middle East, to Morocco.
MuhaddithDotOrg 7 months ago
@evilheem - 2
Also, plz be aware that Ibn Baz is not considered the reference to Muslims on Islamic knowledge. Numerous scholars refuse many of his opinions. How can he testify to the expertise of Albani in Hadeeth, without himself being a hadeeth scholar (and "hafiz", i.e. memorizing hundreds of thousands of hadeeths)?
Neither Albani nor Bin Baz have reached the level that allows them to judge on the authenticity of hadeeths (which again requires to be a Hafiz, not a mere "BOOK OWNER").
MuhaddithDotOrg 7 months ago
@MuhaddithDotOrg Shaykh Albanee has an ijaaza from many scholars, two of these are Shaykh Raaghib Tabbaakh and Shaykh Bahjatul Baitaar, a copy of this ijaaza is with one of his students Al-Halabi. So do not lie about this noble scholar who spent his life devoted to this religion. It is also narrated by Shaykh 'Asheesh that the noble Shaykh has memorised a hundred thousand hadith with their isnad. - part 1
evilheem 7 months ago
@evilheem
Shaykh Albanee was rejected by 99% of the Islamic scholars in Syria as a fraud who was extremely disrespectful to Imam Bukhari and Imam Muslim.
islamophobia4dummies 7 months ago
@islamophobia4dummies And I take it you know 99% of the Islamic scholars in Syria personally then. and as for Saudi Arabia then it is from the best of lands and contains many scholars and yes there are scholars outside it who we take from such as Shaykh Hammad ansaree, Shaykh Muqbil, Shaykh Yahya Al Hajoorie , Shaykh Muhammed amin Shinqinti, Shaykh Muhammad aman al jamee, we take knowledge from the likes of these scholars who are known and trusted by the people
evilheem 7 months ago
@evilheem - 1 of 6
Sorry shaikh Bahjat al Bitar is not a Muhaddith and we challenge the Ijazah you mention: Bring it forth and we will double check it (inshallah).
I met Sh. Bahjat Al Bitar myself, may Allah have mercy on his soul. He was definitely a pro Wahabi (yet owed the respect of my teachers and mine), and IF he gave such an Ijazah, we will prove that it was NOT PURSUANT TO LEARNING.
MuhaddithDotOrg 7 months ago
@evilheem - 2 of 6
(we CAN count years, you know ... and we can bring forth references inshallah, not just "hear-say")
This would then be the type of ijazah for "tabarruk", as a push to Albani, to give him more clout, not more.
MuhaddithDotOrg 7 months ago
@evilheem - 3 of 6
Al Albani was a clock maker, riding a bike (no disrespect intended, these are just the facts) from his house back and forth, NOT to an Islamic school but to his clock SHOP near Masjid al Utaibah where Shaikh Abul Khair al Maidani used to have his daily lessons for decades.
(Shaikh Abul Khair Al Maidani was elected unanimously by Syria's scholars as head of the league of Ulamaa.)
MuhaddithDotOrg 7 months ago
@evilheem - 4 of 6
Albani slowly gathered sniplets from Al Maktabah Zahiriyyah, WITHOUT being taught.
Then his "students" started "publicizing him at the circle of Sh Abul Khair in Masjid al Utaibah, reiterating that Albani was THE learned, THE MOST learned... taunting the circle of Sh Abul Khair (in their own circle of studies).
MuhaddithDotOrg 7 months ago
@evilheem - 5 of 6
Eventually Shaikh Abul Khair accepted the "taunt" and proposed a debate, where Sh All albani would bring around 30 questions from all branches of Islamic disciplines, and where A STUDENT of Sh. Abul Khair (Sh. Mahmoud Al Rankousi, my personal teacher, recounter of this incident) would bring the same number of questions from the same fields.
My teacher Sh. Mahmoud Al Rankousi said: That was the end of it: That person never came back to the circle again (in Masjid al Utaibah).
MuhaddithDotOrg 7 months ago
@evilheem - 6 of 6
It is sad to mention that it was a publicly known fact that Al Albani's father did not consider him at all as "baar" (i.e. under the acceptance and good pleasure) to himself, his father. Sorry this is just a fact, and it does affect one's credibility in the ability to comprehend Islamic texts, may Allah forgive him.
MuhaddithDotOrg 7 months ago
@MuhaddithDotOrg As stated before a copy of the ijazah is with one of his students Ali Hasan bin Ali bin Abdul-Hameed al-Halabi, Shaykh Albanee also studied under the following shaykhs, Shaykh Sa'eed al-Burhan, Shaykh Tawfiq al-Barzah, he also met the noble scholar Ahmad Shakir. The noble shaykh also met the indian hadith scholar Shaykh Abdul-Samad Sharf ad-Deen who considered him to be a great hadith scholar in the letters sent to him.-Part 1
evilheem 7 months ago
@evilheem
Shaikh Said al BURHANI is among the great scholars that REJECTED Albani's claims, & himself accepts & defends tawassul, Sufism, and rejects Salafism, Wahabism, & especially Albani's false claims.
You are cheating or being cheated (therefore following others blindly).
Albani may have "visited" a few lectures of Sh Said al Burhani; al Burhani's son is available to testify that Albani was no "student" of his father, & we'll bring a LONG list of scholars who refuted Albani inshallah.
MuhaddithDotOrg 7 months ago
@MuhaddithDotOrg It is not following blindly as Allah says in the qu'ran ' If a rebellious evil person comes to you with a news, verify it, lest you harm people in ignorance,' so rather what I did was accept the saying of the truthful. As for defending sufism tell me was the messenger of Allah a sufi or who was it who came with sufism, as for shaykh Albani many scholars have defended and praised him, these are scholars who are known and trusted by the people and his students are alive, ask them
evilheem 7 months ago
@MuhaddithDotOrg Shaykh Albanee has been praised and was held in high esteem by the following scholars, Shaykh Muhammad Ibn Saalih al-Uthaymeen, Shaykh Abdul-Muhsin al-Abbaad, Shaykh Muhammad al-Ameen ash-Shinqeeti, Shaykh Abdullaah al-`Ubailaan, Shaykh Muhammad bin Ibraheem Aal ash-Shaykh, Shaykh Muqbil al-Waadi`i and Shaykh Saalih bin `Abd al-`Azeez bin Muhammad Aal ash-Shaykh. If there is any doubt in your mind contact the scholars who are alive today concerning this noble shaykh-Part 2
evilheem 7 months ago
@evilheem
wow...wahhabi's praising other wahabbis, big shocker. What about the 90% Sunni Muslim Majority Scholars of the 4 mathaheb?
Anyway, if you admit that he is not a great muhaddith, then you can more easily explain away his many mistakes. However, your insistence that he did know all of the hadiths that we showed in the video is actually a very big insult from you against Albani that he hid them on purpose.
islamophobia4dummies 7 months ago
@islamophobia4dummies These scholars are from the best of the ummah and you label them wahhabi's, can you even tell me what that term means, these scholars are from Ahlus sunnah wal jammah and they are known to the people and all praises are to Allah your insults do not harm them, rather they only harm yourself. There is no human who makes mistakes except the prophet of Allah (peace be upon him) so the status of Shaykh Albanee is known amongst the muslims he is a noble scholar.
evilheem 7 months ago
@evilheem
the term "wahhabi" means follower of ibn Abdulwahab in declaring tawassul to be shirk.
these scholars are not the top scholars for 90% of Muslims worldwide.
and as we have told you repeatedly, and as we proved in the video, his mistakes cannot be made by a true sincere muhaddith.
So either admit he is missing A LOT of knowledge, or accuse him of LYING on purpose...your choice.
islamophobia4dummies 7 months ago
@islamophobia4dummies But Abdul Wahab is the name of his farther the shaykh's name is Muhammad, and what is your definition of tawassul then? As for the claims in the video Shaykh Albanee is free of them and your claim is ludicrous, you don't know 90% of muslims so how do you know how they feel, tell me which survey you carried out to gather these statistics?
evilheem 7 months ago
@evilheem
Just as we call followers of Imam Ahmed Ibn HANBAL as "Hanbali", there is nothing wrong with identifying the followers of Mohamad Ibn AbdulWAHAB as "WAHHABI".
We cannot call you "Abdulwahhabis". because Ibn Abdulwahhab's sheikh AND father (ie, Abdulwahab) was AGAINST Mohamad Ibn Abdulwahab. His own brother was also against him, so we can't call you "Ibn Abdulwahhabi's" either.
Anyway, the salafi scholar "Al Sheikh" says that you should be proud to call yourself "Wahhabi".
islamophobia4dummies 7 months ago
@islamophobia4dummies Apart form one of the names of Allah is Wahab and how are we followers of him, we follow the Prophet (peace be upon him) and provide a reference to your claim, and maybe you could answer my previous questions
evilheem 7 months ago
@evilheem
the Quran says "كُونُواْ رَبَّانِيِّينَ" so it is not haram to call the followers of Ibn Abdulwahab as "Wahhabis", and especially when Al Sheikh along with many "salafi" scholars consider it a compliment and a testament that they follow his "school". I am not using this term to insult you, so please do not take it that way. It is the earliest known person who presented the claim that tawassul is shirk.
islamophobia4dummies 7 months ago
@evilheem
also, you are mistaken to complain about being called "Wahhabi" for being a follower of Mohamad Ibn Abdulwahhab. You wrote "on of the names of Allah is wahab"...that is incorrect, one of the names of Allah is AL-Wahhab. And another one of the names of Allah is "AL-Malik", yet you don't complain about MALKEEs calling themselves this.
As for all of your previous questions, they have been answered, so please read my replies carefully, and if you are still confused, send me another PM.
islamophobia4dummies 7 months ago
@islamophobia4dummies akhi I have sent you a PM
evilheem 7 months ago
@evilheem
you wrote"As for the claims in the video Shaykh Albanee is free of them":
Please tell me which of the evidence we provided and authentic hadith (of Aisha and the 3 Khulafa al Rashideen) are incorrect? Albani made a claim in his book that is proven wrong according to his own evidence and the more authentic hadiths.
As for Albani's status outside the Wahhabi circle, you are clearly misinformed. Insha Allah, we will dedicate an entire video to show Muslims scholars who debunked him.
islamophobia4dummies 7 months ago
@islamophobia4dummies I will send you an inbox with the details
evilheem 7 months ago
@islamophobia4dummies I have sent you a personal message please read all of it
evilheem 7 months ago
@evilheem
i have read your PM and responded...you have merely REQUOTED Albani's footnotes, which we have ALREADY DEBUNKED in the video!
islamophobia4dummies 7 months ago
@MuhaddithDotOrg And if Shaykh Bin Baaz is not a reference for islamic knowledge then who is left for us, the vast number of students he left behind will attest to his knowledge of Islam, He was a scholar who promoted the good and prevented the vice, if you are in doubt to this matter contact the permanent committee who will no doubt prove as witnesses for his good character, his humility, his knowledge of Islam and other than this-Part 2
evilheem 7 months ago
@evilheem
the rest of the Islamic scholars in all the Muslim countries that have much more credibility, authority, recognition, chain of authority, and no bid'a of objecting to tawassul whatsoever and expelling Muslims from Islam for tawassul like Ibn Abdulwahab.
And the funny thing, is that Ibn Baz does this while simultaneously allowing the American armies into the arabian penninsula, which even ibn Uthaimeen disagrees with totally.
islamophobia4dummies 7 months ago
@evilheem
Ibn Baz making this statement only goes to reduce the credibility of Ibn Baz himself.
And it is IMPOSSIBLE for a true muhaddith to make the "mistakes" pointed out in this video, of CLAIMING the tashahhud was changed, and not knowing that 2 of Khulfa2 al rashideen TAUGHT the original tashahhud FROM THE PULPIT.
islamophobia4dummies 7 months ago
the biggest dajjal
YZTWR 7 months ago
i would like to know what was the mohammad's religion before introducing Islam when he was at the age of 40? because back then there was no Islam?
alexx8905 7 months ago in playlist Anti Islam-ophobia Muslim Response, Muhaddith Islamic Videos
@alexx8905
Before receiving the Revelation of Islam, Christian and Jewish religions existed around Muhammad (PBUH), as well as idol worshipping.
He did not follow any of these, he abstained and maintained the haneefa "method" (remnants from Abrahamic times), pivoting mainly around the acceptance of our Creator Allah, and the refusal to worship idols.
MuhaddithDotOrg 7 months ago
@MuhaddithDotOrg as far as i know through the books he was following the " religion of Ibrahim" thats why most of the Muslim mosques has the sign of the "moon" and if its not that then please explain why the have the sign of moon on their mosques? even the one in Madina which is main one.. peace
alexx8905 7 months ago
@alexx8905
Yes the remnants of the religion of Ibrahim is called "haneefiyyah". Linguistically it means turning away from false religions.
The moon is the declaration that we follow the Lunar calendar, that the Muslim months are calculated based on the moon (not the sun), among which are the months holy to us such as Ramadan and Zhul Hijjah, Muharram... These occasions mean a lot to us, thus the moon became our symbol as opposed to forbidden statues, idols, the christian cross, or whatever.
MuhaddithDotOrg 7 months ago
whats the name if the nasheed at the start
KGilLegendkiller 7 months ago
the Salfia/Wahabia nowadays are following Ibn Taymiah as long as he agrees with Albany, and they follow Albany as long as he agrees with Ibn Baz which disagrees many things with Ibn Taymiah.
and btw they are not all same, and they disagree with each other.
also most of them disagree with Ibn Alqayem with what he said in his book "AlRouh" where he confirmed that the Prophet Mohamad (pbuh) can't be considered as just a dead person, but they insist on that matter!.
ahmattu2 7 months ago
LMFAOO !! Quote.... "if you say YA RASOOLLALAH" it means your worshiping the Prophet MOhammed (phbh)..
This is just mockery... how can anyone make such a MISLEADING claim ?
rapandrnb 7 months ago
You are doing something sneaky here, when they go to the grave, and say Assaalmu alaika/kum on the Prophet this is one thing, but the companions didnt go about and say, Ya Rasulula SAWS, give me something. The prophet didnt teach this in most sayings or actions, so there is no reason to resort to it for wanting something. Already you should know that scholars have stated both are permissible in prayer. Taking Dr.Phillips as THE resource for all "salafi" scholars is well..its not being just too
a1qwyx20 7 months ago
@a1qwyx20
1- Prophet Muhammad (pbuh) TAUGHT the tawassul prayer
2- The COMPANION Uthman Ibn Hunayf TAUGHT the tawassul prayer
3- The 4 Mujtahideen and mathaheb are in unanimous consensus that tawassul is good (yahsun).
4- At least we can FINALLY agree (you and us) that Bilal Philips is NOT "THE" resource for all "salafi" scholars, so I guess we are uniting the Ummah after all !
islamophobia4dummies 7 months ago
Since, it's obvious that this does not nullify one's prayer (email any scholar from the madhadib or visit their websites where this question has already been answered as both forms being ok), than what really is the point of this video?
Ibn Baz said something contrary to what you claim about "salafis". He said, "What is prescribed is to say that which the Prophet taught to the Sahaba. He taught them to say: “al-salaamu ‘alayka ayyuha’l-nabiyyu wa rahmat-Allahi wa barakaatuhu (during tashahhud).
SFAvfx 7 months ago
@SFAvfx
the point of this video is to show that CONTRARY to Bilal Philips claim, saying "YA RASULLULLAH" and speaking to Prophet Muhammad in any way whatsoever inside and outside the prayer is NOT "worship" EVER...not through tawassul, not in the tashahhud, NEVER.
Furthermore, this video shows the lengths that SOME Salafis will go to defend their opinions.
Finally, Ibn Uthaimeen ALSO disagrees with Albani about tashahhud.
SO, The Salafi methodology leads to a lot of contradictions.
islamophobia4dummies 7 months ago
@SFAvfx
ALSO, we are NOT the ones making the false claim that "the companions" CHANGED the tashahhud by using weak hadiths and ignoring the Khulafa' al Rahsideen.
islamophobia4dummies 7 months ago
I really don't know how this video proves tawwasul with the dead. Your title contradicts with what you said @ 12:18 proving both forms are permissible. Very misleading @ 13:47, if you read the rest of the quote by ibn Hajar, he states, "However, the narration of Abu Ma'mar is (i.e same hadith in Bukhari Volume 8, Book 74, Number 281) is more authentic..." Which makes what you said @ 14:19 completely erroneous.
SFAvfx 7 months ago
@SFAvfx
No, sorry, it seems you only viewed our video SUPERFICIALLY.
Review it again, then we are ready to discuss, seriously. But we advise you to slow down on your accusations.
Again: stay cool, review our quotes, AND WHAT WE ARE COMMENTING CONCERNING EACH QUOTE AND EACH DALEEL.
MuhaddithDotOrg 7 months ago
@SFAvfx
1- we provided the hadith of the COMPANION Uthman ibn Hunayf, and IMAM al Nawawi, both teaching TAWASSUL
2- we did not deny that both forms are permissible, but the 4 mujtahideen and Muslims for 14 centuries follow the PROPER methodology of the Sunnah of the Prophet & Khulafa al Rashideen
3- Ibn Hajar is referring to Ibn Masood's original hadith from Bukhari (where Ibn Masood says "we used to") as being more authentic than this one (where Ibn Masood says "this is how we are taught").
islamophobia4dummies 7 months ago
@SFAvfx The proof of tawassul is in other videos. Tis video exposes the twisting that some 'scholars' do to fit their views. If you think the prophet can't hear us than you've got a serious aqida issue, as the soul is eternal : "And do not speak of those who are slain in Allah's way as dead; nay (they are) alive, but you do not perceive." Quran 2.154
zedsj 7 months ago
Also, this isn't personal, but what is with the beard? According to all the 4 Imams, who you quote it is FARD to keep a beard of atleast one fist, so why don't you? The same can be said about your headgear, all of your hair should be covered, but there is a little poking out.
This is by no means a personal attack, and I apologise if the discrepancies I pointed out are a result of a medical problem (skin irritation) etc.
Bilal1234live 7 months ago
@Bilal1234live
No.
WE request U to quote that according to the 4 mazhahib the length of one fist is fard. Please give us the proof (must be easy), & we'll make a video apologizing.
After (& only after) u fail, we'll provide quotations inshallah, but we want U 1st to research & benefit, not just "shoot from the hip".
This is a deja: That people
1- SELECT 1 opinion from many
2- Force others to that opinion by claiming "this is the only opinion available" (this is not good Islamic comportment).
MuhaddithDotOrg 7 months ago
@Bilal1234live - 2
As for the beard, subhanallah, don't you know of people who were created by Allah without a full beard?
Myself, & the speaker (my son) are such people!
Following minimal Islamic ethics of "husn zhann" can help U a lot in life, and would have speared you the mistake U are doing here: when you see something, you immediately jump to the worst suspicious interpretation. Subhanallaah, this is characteristic of Salafi influence, & lack of tazkiyah that Allah mentioned in the Quran.
MuhaddithDotOrg 7 months ago
@MuhaddithDotOrg Here is the evidence regarding the beard: watch?v=JTmFoYeozLc
I already iterated that my comment were not meant as a personal attack, so please don't assume it was ill intentioned, especially after I explicitly stated it wasn't. Like you said, don't jump to conclusions.
This is something you brothers have done in regard to Bilal Philips' mistake. You pointed his mistake of "Ayuharasool" out more than once, and spoke of his scholarship in a demeaning and derogatory manner.
Bilal1234live 7 months ago
@Bilal1234live
1- We ask you to cite your references here, not to send us to any other video, please.
Tip: According to 1 mazh-hab, growing the beard is a Sunnah not an obligation. So research & you will know.
2- We have been very kind (not derogatory) with B.P. VIEWING HIS ATTITUDE with respect to people who teach tawassul (among them is a companion, etc... review our video).
It keeps boiling down to: BP can say what he wants, implying shirk etc, and we must SHUT UP and not explain the truth.
MuhaddithDotOrg 7 months ago
@MuhaddithDotOrg I implore you watch the video, the speaker cites references from scholars and books from all 4 Madaahib. Please leave your foregone conclusions behind you when you watch the video. I have already been accused by yourselves of being judgmental, even though I distanced myself from ill intentions.
Bilal1234live 7 months ago
@Bilal1234live
Sorry to tell you, but you are falsely accusing me of doing something HARAM, and this is a serious issue:
1- the minimum requirement to keep a beard is to grow the hair on the chin
2- trimming the beard (like me, and like Bilal Philips) to less than a fist-full is makrooh according to the Shafi'i school (Imam Nawawi, Ibn Hajar, etc)
3- My moustache is closer to the sunnah than Bilal Philips, as I do shave it, as per the hadith "احفوا الشوارب واعفوا عن اللحى"
islamophobia4dummies 7 months ago
Again another divisive video on an isolated issue, which bears little weight in the affairs of the common Muslim. Clearly you have an agenda, although I agree with you on the Tashahudd, but bear in mind that the Tashahudd is a recollection of the incident in which Allah said to the Prophet "Peace be upon you" (during Mi'raj), and we by saying that are only recollecting the conversation, and are in no way doing "WASEELA", as you claim.
You provided no evidence of Sahaba saying "ya rasoolullah"
Bilal1234live 7 months ago
@Bilal1234live
1- Yes we do have an "agenda":
TO UPHOLD THE TRUTH by citing solid references according to the Salaf al Salih, including The Companions (R) and 4 Mujtahideen. Not blindly following & eulogizing persons such as Ibn Taymiyyah and BP, no matter how wrong they are. Not everything they say is wrong; our "agenda" is to correct mistakes that they did.
2- IF the issue is so TRIVIAL to you, why not object against those who STARTED IT?
Instead, if we try to answer, you want us to "shut up"?
MuhaddithDotOrg 7 months ago
@Bilal1234live cont'd
3- Very strange that you ask us to provide evidence of Sahaba saying "ya rasoolullah":
We cited the HADEETH of the COMPANION Uthman ibn Hunaif TEACHING tawassul, with the wording you requested!!!!!!!!!
Subhanallah... Is it that you cannot remember what you viewed, or that you just storm in, without even viewing the video!!!
If we BEND OVER, BACKARDS, you will still not be satisfied... You will say we "bewitched" you.
MuhaddithDotOrg 7 months ago