Added: 5 years ago
From: kingerz
Views: 417,645
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (893)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • Iran could learn an important lesson from Hiroshima.

  • Remind you...death is just a crazy president's button-push away

  • Walk towards that mushroom cloud, Private...That's an ORDER!!!

  • 1:02 teminator 3 rise of the mechines that was a great movie and 1 is good but salvation and 2 is and 3 kiked assss

  • any one find the baby sound sort of creepy:(

  • i take it back, the enemy would've been defeated but the americans and the allies would have lost 200,000,000 during the invasion of Tokyo

  • @chalupa los aliados y estados unidos perdieron : 1.600.000 de soldados , y fue la invasion con mas muertes de parte aliada en toda la segunda guerra mundial . probablemente en esa epoca los paises que mencionas no llegaban en total de poblacion (incluyendo civiles) a ese numero , piensa antes de decir ¬¬

  • Nuclear weapons are just the ultimate cowards weapons. How warfare has changed over the wars.

  • @martynrobin121 we would have never won WWII without using an atomic bomb...

  • @chalupa How? Are you stupid? British had defeated the Aixs in North Africa at Al Alamein with the Axis on full retreat and crushed, going into a trap with Americans arriving in Tunisa 1943 to trap the Axis and drive them out! In the East Russia had crushed the Axis at Moscow,Stalingrad,Kursk 1943 and were on full advance to berlin! 1945 Japan stands alone, Russia invades China and declares war on Japan after the refue to surrender to the first A-bomb dropped.!

  • @chalupa Japan was the only Axis Nation still standing 1945, And they were crushed the American Marines had taken there Empire Islands, Russia had invaded China and the British were winning in India and Burma. The Japs were crushed without the A-bomb America would have had to invade Japan and they would have won but lost countless thousands!

  • Comment removed

  • this dude said isreal he must be a commy lol or somethin cuz they wont shoot unless the united states has their back... iran is fake, faker then the USSR during the cold war....if any country it would be those damn N. koreans! it doesnt matter if u only have 10 active war-heads, it only takes one to end the world. and u cant forget about nuclear terrorism....pakistan has nukes and where is al-queda???? huh? huh?? huh??? yea MehrabS shut the fuck up bitch and pay attention. .

  • @chalupa one would end the world?... how?.. explain please.. :)

  • @DrKillaser havnt you seen the movie War Games? if one nuke goes off they all go off...during the cold war the nuke that would have started armageddon would brobly be a battlefield tactical nuclear weapon such as an artillery shell or in the 1980's, a cruise missile. then after we bombed the hell out of their troops with battlefield nukes (smaller then Hiroshima) they would respond with a 1-3 megaton thurmonuclear weapon...the target: NATO Headquaters. all it takes is one bomb to end the world.

  • @chalupa ah.. in that case one atomic/nuclear/H bomb would start a "chain reaction" which will lead to worlds end..but not one bomb and BANG!

  • Comment removed

  • why don't we just trash this shit in space and forget bout it

  • lets face it there is no tommorrow for nukes

  • how fucking retarded are we? let me say it differently, how fucking ( error: words cannot express rage) are we to let them build this shit? the only point of this is to destroy cities and kill hundreds of thousands of idiots in few seconds. we want to live right? someone please tell me why this is necessary because i cannot figure out why the fuck we even let the most corrupt power(the governments) build WMDs. nuclear war is gay, drafts and ground combat is a great idea at this point.

  • @DRcaprice The concept is MAD. A working deterrence too..

  • @DRcaprice world war II had to end and so the Atomic bomb was created...we would've lost half of america's forces invading the Japanesse mainland. i say the same thing as you but in history it had to be done.

  • @chalupa true, but thats the whole concept of war, its fucking dumb, but i would not mind going to war because life is not as precious as i thought it was. im just living to see what people will fuck up next....

  • @DRcaprice dawin stated that species evolve based on the environment we are in... so warfare, as shitty as it is, is what makes humans strong, and drives most of their ingenuity... if humans didnt have conflict with eachother from day 1, we probably wouldnt have made it to this point as a species

  • @101andrewj yeah thats true, but we are going to war for the wrong reasons. but fuck it, fighting is natural for every animal.

  • @DRcaprice every animal that wants to survive and prosper

  • @101andrewj yeah, but we have strictly non-violent humans. thats excessive domestication in my opinion. humans are vary interesting.

  • @101andrewj I have to disagree. I think, with all due respect, that it's a very pessimistic viewpoint to think that the only way for human beings to form a stronger community for themselves and for the world is to rip each other apart with nuclear weapons or weapons in general. Species fight, but species also make relations and peace as well. Would you rather live in a world where no one wins or where everyone wins?

  • @GentlemanThunder7 would you rather live in a world where everything fights eachother, or not live at all.. because that is the real choice... of course i would pick to live in a peaceful world where everything is treated equal by all, but that is unrealistic and never going to happen... the strong survive.. the weak dont... and warfare makes us strong... its shitty, but reality

  • @101andrewj agreed

    

  • Can anyone provide me the names of the videos that were used to create this? Specifically the one(s) where there are space-ships fighting. The first one, where it's three missiles being launches and only one making it, reminds me of Stargate SG-1, am I right? If so, what episode? If not, what is it from?

    Thanks!

  • the animals in Israel have over 200 nuclear warheads and have threatened to use them against their neighbours and againt Europe. Don't take my word for it. Watch this video and you'll see what I mean ---> /watch?v=_qxzZY4JycY

  • @MehrabS lol get ur facts straight dude Isreal is NATO, they are western allies if anything they only wanna nuke iran and other palastine states in the middle east. Pakastan has nuclear weapons......now thats sum scary shit..

  • @chalupa It's very obvious that you've lost a significant amount of brain cells listening to that shit music that's on your page. When was the last time Pakistan threatened anyone with a nuke?? Israel has been threatening to use "strategic nukes" on Iran for the past 2 years at least!!! Why is it that israel has not signed the nuclear non proliferation treaty? If you don't know what that is go look it up you uneducated fool. So who's the one people should fear???

  • @MehrabS lol ur a foo for sayin Pakistan is threatning u dumbass where do u think all of the terrorist groups are... before u go and start judging ppl based on a comment on the fuckin internet go learn about the cold war then come talk to me. u wanna talk nuclear war, world war 3 and who or what can start it. i hate all of you little kids who think u know what ur talking about. anyone 21 or younger has no right on this subject just cuz you all are too young to even understand nuclear weapons.

  • Check out Atomic Cafe I have the whole documentary on my page as a favorite

  • all the people in the buncker died from nuclear poisening

  • '

    america was first A bomb,,,

    ussr russia did copy steal from america,,,

    ussr russia is a big famous cheater country

  • @bestamerica go cry to uncle sam shitface

  • Harisdoubled,

    '

    go ask czars, lenin, and stalin,,,

    stalin already knew his own russian did copy steal from american first Abomb

  • @bestamerica real life isnt like a video game they did steal from america with the spys at the M. Project but america was at war with russia. they dint want to use the bomb they wanted to counter america with something bigger and better but they never could.... thats y russia put up so many bluffs during the cold war....the cuban missile crises was the biggest bluff any country has tryed and america caught em in the act.

  • chalupa,

    '

    okay thank explain,,,

    i am still NOT like ussr russia,,,

    ussr russia is always troublemaker / evil empire country in the world

  • @bestamerica Damn... Maybe your government should of spent less on bombs and more on education. Reading your post is a test in deciphering: ''america was first A bomb'' Are you saying: In the beginning America was an explosive devise?

    ''ussr russia did copy steal from america'' So USSR or Russia? And did they steal or cheat? Or is it both but you where unable to form a coherent sentence. Or did you learn to write English from a Jacob Two Two novel?

  • slickrickdarula,

    '

    hi there,,,

    dont use 2 words - YOU / YOUR - on me,,,

    yes remember ussr russia is a big evil empire country in the whole world,,,

    russia have ALOT of waste arms weapons from russian slaveries workers

  • @bestamerica I will remember not to take foreign policy advice from someone who cannot form a proper sentence tyvm.

  • lol 1:30 is from star wars

  • eso q bien

  • If planes are dropping nuclear babies than my orgasms must be like nuclear detonations...

  • Nuclear bombs are cool, scarry at the same time but also cool. An NO I'm not saying that it was cool that we bombed Japan, I'm talking about watching the nuclear bomb testing videos.

  • they dont all hit the ground, some are set to be air burst where they can do more damage

  • @go4broke92 If they hit the ground, the ground absorbs the blast so it doesnt work

  • @andyisapro oh i know that , thats what i was trying to say just not in so many words haha

  • @andyisapro Actually it does work. Ground Bursts just cause fall out in the local vicinity while true most nuclear detonations are air burst due to the thermal heat and blast range. But underground bunkers and areas that need contaminating will suit ground bursts more effectively. There is often a choice with US Nuclear weapons on delivery modes now a days.

  • errm, anyone know the name of the song from 1:28 to 1:53 ???

  • lol

  • ..............................­...........

  • litle bomb

  • ich bin für die weltweite abrüstung!

  • I don't know about anyone else here but i think if we can't control are Nuclear tech then how the hell are we going to survive any future tech.

  • 2:06 the guy is clearly saying WTF?

  • If you think about it , there is no question that a nuclear war will happen , the world as we know it will be no more .

    uless what they say about 2012 is true, maybe its the same thing anyway .

  • @ahmednabil Perhaps not a full blown one, Perhaps a tactical one. 2012 will just be a normal year like any other......

  • @goddesslush

    you dont know that neither do you know otherwise . material science made us so arrogant , dont you think? our primitive-mostly assumed knowledge makes us say "is simply not possible" thats what we call science , its all assumed knowledge thats why its called scientific theories , i mean the whole geometric knowledge is based on the notion of a straight line , and then it was proved that there is not such thing as a stright line .

  • @ahmednabil With regard to how these weapons work in a tactical and full blown nuclear event id say i have a good estimate to how these weapons would kill society as a hole at least thats based in reality so you can argue with me fantasy all you like.. LETS wait and see im sure there be a number of people looking and feeling stupid when they could of saved there lives the trouble.

  • @ahmednabil Of course if you refer to 2012 events. All i can say is wait AND see i cant see a nuclear conflict. The powers that be love money too much until the resource war commences under the guise of terrorism wait and see how that goes...

  • @goddesslush the "war on terror " already started , thatterm is so bogus i can never use it without the quotation marks .

    i do agree with you .

    and yes i am referring the 2012 events, people seem to be sure .

  • @ahmednabil

    Only thing 2012 is, is something made up by christians reading a terrible translation of the bible. The world won't end. The current astrological age will. And even then the timing of 2012 is wrong by being over 100 years too early.

  • The birth of the atomic age. Eat your heart out Japan Behold America's Baby!

  • Well.... I don't care who says what...thermonuclear war is inevitable. Efforts are being made to reduce bomb qty's, but they'll never go away, and they've only been in existence since the 1940's...."never" is a very long time. hard to say what will cause it or where it starts, but it'll happen. maybe not for another 100+ yrs...but eventually. There are too many ppl with differing political/religious views who have them...

  • Hehe, this is just a bunch of footage from terminator 3:p

  • Anyone who says nukes don't solve problems has never heard of WWII. 2 nukes, problem solved! Hooray for us!

  • @VaeVictis122 your an idiot

  • @niall777 you mean 'you're an idiot'? If you don't use the proper punctuation and spelling, it simply means an idiot belonging to me. You're as opposed to your. Get it? So see, you are the idiot!

  • @VaeVictis122 i stand corrected. but you're still an idiot

  • i hate the new youtube!!! yea i know irrelavent

  • and whats the name of the first song? i love it.

  • @lord0kaisier the cult, love removal machine

  • Looks like what happends everytime a take a dump.

  • i guess people just like seeing explosions...

  • Did you all know that the french tested thos nukes , in the attoll, and there is now a 70 pct increase in thoiroid cance in australians and new zealanders becouse of it , my wife was lucky to get over her cancer, she was in new zealand when the french did the last testing , and 3 of the ppl she was with have the same cancer , Fo u fuckin frog mofos, go do that shit in ur own backyard , the yanks and russians are just as bad , they want world peice and yet the fuck the world up by doing testing.

  • Poster must think everyone is an idiot, as they have footage from The Day After mixed in there, laughs.

  • 3:07 is spooky .... see it anybody???????

  • Yeah wierd. Skull in the explosion.

  • My name is goddesslush, and i give only mindless crap responces such as below.

  • If your going to be stupid. Then be stupid what i say is actually based on reality. Apart from the fall out. Volcano have more explosive force then some nuclear weapons.Go figure you uneducated piece of shit. There nothing more stupid then people like you who have nothing educational to say.

  • Why are no QUESTIONS about; NUKE TEST ill effects to earth's O'zone, our earth's sea life miles dead after tests, and can it effect the climate?  A lg dead zone in ocean must have effects?

  • Possibly but did you know volcano's put up more debris then a nuclear weapon.

  • I'm trying to help make inroads into the ignorance zelonephyco speaks about with my TalkWorks1 YouTube channel.

    It's true, the general public know next to nothing about nuclear issues.

    Please pass the word around about TalkWorks' videos made from interviews I'm carrying out with leading experts & policymakers who are putting their collective weight behind President Obama's nuclear disarmament initiative. They need the support of us, the public, to make it work!

    Rosie@TalkWorks1

  • There is a tremendous amount of ignorance in this world and it's really starting to piss me off

  • What ignorance do you speak off?

  • blast will destroy the reasorces of the world.

    radiation will poision the air

    nuclear winter will block out light

  • What is scary is that the Soviets built this Dead Hand program during the Cold War that involved three men in a deep bunker that would launch all the nukes at the U.S. once the Soviet nation and leadership was wiped out. They did not even tell the U.S. of this doomsday tool as a deterrent against nuclear attack. It was kinda scary that IF even after the Soviet Union destroyed by US nukes they would still want to destroy the US with nukes even if there was no strategic importance in doing so.

  • I could have sworn I saw a move on this exact thing once.........

  • Its real though...like actually go search it up on google. Russian Dead Hand Program.  Its gone now though.

  • Lots of these shots were taken from movies (Terminator).

  • @tigerswede3

    I meant Doctor Strangelove, I think I was replying to a comment about the russian dead foot system.

  • Ai esta a prova definiitiva de que é o diabo quem governa este mundo estupido, nogento, cruel e insano. Veja bem quantas vidas e dinheiro são desperdiçados devido ao desentendimento dos governantes deste mundo? é a maior das insanidades. A unica resposta para isso tudo é a manipulação pelo diabo com essas marionetes que são os governos deste mundo. O As profecias de Daniel 2:44 nos consola pois lá diz que os dias do diabo e de seus governados estão acabando. Aleluia!!!!!

  • NNM: Nuclear Noob Missiles.

  • fuck you cunt i hate you bitch

  • WHY dont we ever just USE the damn things!? It stopped WW2, maybe a half dozen or so in the middle east would solve the problem and get us out of there!

  • Its people like you in dictatorship that cause wars, you think that everything can be solved by running in all guns blazing. I understand you dont want our troops over in the middle east but what good would dropping a nuclear bomb do ? We are trying to make the middle east better for the civilians who live there, we dont want to blow it sky high. so nothing and no one could survive there, Honestly if you believe in things like that then please do NOT vote when your able to.

  • People like me don't cause wars, we win them. Very few problems there are that can't be corrected with the proper allocation of sufficient brute force. We are in the mid east for oil, not to "promote dumbocracy" or spread "fweedom". I do vote, and I bet it ain't the same way you do ....

    What gave humans dominion over the earth was the unique ability to conceive, design, make and use weapons. Now we are just in a Darwinian struggle which will result in the superior on top. SOS.

  • You win them for the wrong reasons, you win them coz you have a bigger weapon than them, if we only want oil then its not them who should be bombed its us coz were just stealing. We have dominion over the world and if we go with your views then We will no longer have dominion because we will kill everyone ourselves and humanity as a race will fall. Of course you dont vote in the same way i do coz i think about who is in the wrong and how we can make it better for everyone. Not just myself.

  • I thought this was democracy, i should be able to vote for what i think is right. I am not going to have some fucking hippie dipshit tell me how to use my rights as an American. My father fought in Iraq for your ass to have the right to speak freely in the United States. So go cut yourself you liberal piece of shit.

  • Your dad fought a pointless war like so many others who think they are doing a good thing for there country the reality is he is just another tool like some many others.. Yet you still maintain your freedom of speech shame its with out any hindsight.

  • @sebb3003 What about all the people who have miserable lives in the USA, why should they care what the fuck happens to a people who has brought them nothing but Terrorism, division and war. It's not the US's fault there's so many dickhead dictators around.

  • @williebruciestewie They Havent Brought Only terrorism though, I also Wasnt blaming the us for anything i was just Saying that Dropping a bomb Is the complete wrong thing to do, and when people say just do it itll solve problems no it wont. all thatll happen is therell be innocent lives lost, And the people that got away from your bomb, Would have to live somewhere else, and where do you think there gonna come to ? PLaces they think they will live a better life, For example, The U.S and britain.

  • @sebb3003 it solved WW2! booyaaa!

  • @VaeVictis122 No it didnt, Russia got bombed and So did japan ? :S

  • @sebb3003 Are you on medication? 2 bombs on Japan. What does a nuke in world war 2 have to do with Russia? Hiroshima and Nagasaki were both Japanese cities. Losses of civilians were in the hundreds of thousands, which is terrible, yet the losses of a protracted land war would have been in the millions, so the best decision was made. The war was ended after the second bomb on Japan, so the nukes did solve the problem. Also, the US did not get involved until Japan bombed the US.

  • @williebruciestewie saddam hussein sponsored by cia, taliban sponsored by cia and so on and on

  • @sebb3003 Then there's people like you who feel they need to dictate how the world should be. Your just as bad as the person your telling off. As for making it better for civilians your more than welcome to believe that. Simply not the case thou. Media has a funny thing of making people believe what they want. Reality is a different creature thou.

  • @sebb3003 it worked pretty well in hiroshima

  • @sebb3003 "we are trying to make the middle east better for the civilians " AH AH AH u funny is that what u really think that they r doing there ? go there kill terrorists and come back home wow we saved the world again ? lol open ur eyes dont belive in everything u read see and hear u dont even know 1% of what that hell is going on out there ....

  • @sebb3003 "if u belive in things like that then please do not vote" he doesnt need to coz u r voting for them ...YES WE CAN YES WE CAN .... when i win the campaign i will remove all combat troops out of iraq " well tell me what happen? he moved some troops from iraq to afghanistan and sent 1000s more to afghanistan so whats so different between bush and obama ? not much really u know why ? coz they r not the ones that make those decisions if they make any at all..think about it..........

  • @kingkongvsjurassic please don't be so hostile 'sebb3003' is still young just a toddler which has much to learn. try not to belittle the person but try to educate the person with good references so they can do their own reading ^_^ and grow in mind and spirit for we are all brothers there is no need to compete we are all one.

  • @sebb3003 Ahh!! Look at the little toddler. dud look beyond the beyond and do some reading into the past 150 years of war and see the instigators. You will be surprised to know who started all these wars that killed millions. when you cheek the true reasons one can only laugh, the sadism the occultism the church the wanton disregard for life everyone every organization. Lastly who is trying to make what better where did u come off on this do u see with your own eyes or throw someone else(TV)

  • @lightfdar My Dad is russian Guess where he used to live ? Chernobyl So Do not DARE say I see the effects through someone elses eyes MY dad is lucky tht he got out of there quick enough but Yes some of his friends didnt, That is what nuclear can do to people, yes it wasnt a bomb but it still has the same effects.

  • @sebb3003 Well then I am not attacking u but please bear in mind that was a very small exert of my comment. There is no need for arrogance only understanding what I'm saying to u in short is your barking up the wrong tree. Yes ty God ur dad got out of that death trap but my idea and intentions was never directed at a bomb but the people in control. Lets me say this read over my fist comment this time with open eyes then make a better comment. BYE.

  • @sebb3003 Something to look forward too in the coming years... Duck and cover..

  • @sebb3003 man i understand how you feel. but things are getting pretty bad and are choices of "dealing with them are getting smaller.:(

  • And who do we drop it on, and what country will come to their defence. I doubt we would be getting out of there, more likely many many more will be sent over to fight in a bigger deadlyer war if we did that. Terriorist are blowing up their own people, so we blow them up to? Point me at the cave with the bad guys and I'll pull the triger myself, but not killing any more innocents then necessary just because I got a big firecracker then he has.

  • because human nature is to one-up everyone else in every aspect of life, and unfortunately this is the most dark example of this

  • why did we make these

  • out of the fear of the other guy making them.

  • I prefer to listen to...

    Counting Bodies Like Sheep - A perfect circle.

    when watching this video.

  • We can say, and it is no paradox, Thermonuclear weapons are a thing of beauty because their explosive yield per warhead is greater than that of other conventional weapons constructed under similar conditions.

  • SON OF A BİTCH AMERİCA

  • ugly shit. we should have arrested einstein before he went to usa

  • Einstein said that it was his greatest mistake to contribute to nuclear weapons.

     But if Einstein had not helped, the USSR would have had nuclear weapons first. Would that have been any better?

  • fallout 3 at 1:17

  • No, terminator 3

  • Nuclear weapons are extremely accurate. They always hit the ground.

  • lol

  • @mothlegend Ground? Ground is awful Must nukes always detonate air burst. More destruction. Ground bursts cause more fall out thou...

  • @mothlegend they dont touch the ground....they explode above ground to maximize the blast and create an electro magnetic pulse. a radio giroscope detects how close it is to the ground before it fires a rod into the plutinium that, within the speed of light, eraces all this shit around us.=) and that phuquing baby screaming.

  • @mothlegend They actually detonate somewhere near 800 meters off the ground

  • maybe that's why Mars is a big red pile of rubble

  • Did that guy on 2:05 just say "it's huge, what the f*ck"?

  • Yes he did. LOL

  • "Two, One, Fire!" - not "it's huge, wtf?"

  • Nuclear holocaust is cool

  • And your blood is cold.

  • Weapons of mass destruction Suck!

  • Cesaro Sumability =)

  • terminator II the classic scene all the kids were awing over XD

  • very sad

  • If there was a ballistic missile directly over the middle of the atlantic ocean heading for Europe or the USA, would it be possible to simply send regular explosive missiles to destroy it?

    Even it did set off the warhead, wouldn't it be better for there to be nuclear explosions over the ocean than in cities?

  • not really because the water would be contaminated which will end up all over the world, i think would be best over land yes casualties would be massive but it would be more contained

  • You need to have a knowledge of nuclear physics, it won't explode if you blow it up because it needs to reach a supercritical mass which is achieved by making a sphere.

    But yes, the US could destroy the missle if they had warning.

  • Na te is csak egy hülye amerikai vagy.

  • The missiles that russia contains , is an automatic nuculear missiles so if U.S was even to detect the missle with satelites even if they collided it with another missle yes it wouldnt be as bad , but it would still make an impact responsible for millions of life.... plus if U.S was to collide with another missile the missle releases a chemical called radation which infacts oxygen and it will block the sun... so either way once a nuculear missle if up in the air its bad news that no one can end.

  • 1. I barely understood any of that.

    2. Radiation isn't a chemical. It's technically anything that "radiates" outwards, but in this context you're referring to Alpha (Helium Nuclei), Beta (Electron radiation) and Gamma (High energy light waves) radiation.

    Radiation does a lot worse than block the sun......

  • I know the cabalitys of radiation from nuculear missiles , its extremely dangerous (blocking sun light , makeing oxygen dirty , causeing anormal humans , etc.) and missiles can cause destructions rangeing from impact , to sevral extreme dieaseases caused by a nuculear fall out..

  • please learn english properly.

  • yes and that is so far what we have planned for a defense against them, and as long as the warhead isnt armed when the missle is destroyed then it wont go off, the warheads wont arm until they are a certain distance from the target

  • Ahh you don't know shit.

  • the part about the defense is iffy, but the part about the warhead not goin off early is true, they're designed like that so they don't detonate early or while bein transported, look it up, all missile systems are designed like that to where they don't arm until after a certain distance or time,

  • See you dont know shit. Stop talking while you still got a chance.

  • You're a fucking idiot. Go die.

  • Suck my nuts you dumb little cunt.

  • wow this is a shit vid.

  • A CIA report was published about 25 years ago that explained the futility of nuclear war.

    It stated that it would only take the detonation of 130 nuclear devices in the right places (food and water for example) to kill 90 percent of the world's population and less that 300 detonations of food and water sources to kill everyone in the planet within a year.

  • The SS-20 Satan remains the ultimate ballistic missile. There is no anti-missile defense system to counter it. It can carry 10 warheads (550 kiloton each) a distance of more than 11,000 kilometers

  • ss-20 needs 2 hours refueling and couldn't stand in the state for longer period, so they are uncapable to fast or sudden usage

  • it's bullshit about ss-20. it's does not need "2 hour for refueling" every time. it's solid-fueled missile, ready to launch in few minutes.

    New russian mobile vehicle Topol-m need less than 5 minute for missile deployment and launch(prepare to launch missile from tube - ~1 minute).

  • Check out rs-20 and ss-18 satan, wow, so awesome, come out a train, pops out in 2s.