(cont...)......"Throughout recorded time,..., there have been three kinds of people in the world, the High, the Middle, and the Low. They have been subdivided in many ways... but the essential structure of society has never altered. Even after enormous upheavals and seemingly irrevocable changes, the same pattern has always reasserted itself" ('1984')
@diceyLee Nothing has ever really changed. Why? The starting point of whatever revolutions that have gone before has never considered All Equally as One but has always been based on separation. From the starting point of separation we can only create separation and that's why nothing has never really changed. For real change to happen, we must change our starting point from separation to consideration of All Life as Equals.
@WeiWuHere Would you not consider the anarchical-socialist post-revolutionary Spain, "the Second Republic", as a accurate example of a 'All Equality' revolution?
@diceyLee I have no idea of that. So i can not really say anything about it. But if it does not take into consideration of all beings as equals and understand that we all have the same basic needs as food, clothing, shelting, education and medical care etc and allow all beings to have equal access to these, then it won't be 'All Equality'.
Systemic war isnt apart of Marx iv read (can you provide ref. for me), it sounds a hell of alot like Orwell's or Trotsky's writings on communism.... I agree that Marx's communism solution to Capitalism is unachievable as a whole.
But what would you say to Orwell when he says: (cont....)
@diceyLee I don't know about Orwell or Trotsky. My understanding is based on textbooks of Marxist philosophy used in China. About the view of violent revolution in Marxism, you can have a glance at The Communist Manifesto (on wiki). In part IV "Position of the Communists in Relation to the Various Opposition Parties" -- "The Communists disdain to conceal their views and aims. They openly declare that their ends can be attained only by the forcible overthrow of all existing social conditions..."
It is a crucial understanding that our starting POINT is from the MIND Consciousness of GREED, POWER / ENERGY, which is based on POLARITY to achieved SELF's victory is SELF's LIMITation.
p.s. nice video by the way.....
diceyLee 1 year ago
(cont...)......"Throughout recorded time,..., there have been three kinds of people in the world, the High, the Middle, and the Low. They have been subdivided in many ways... but the essential structure of society has never altered. Even after enormous upheavals and seemingly irrevocable changes, the same pattern has always reasserted itself" ('1984')
diceyLee 1 year ago
@diceyLee Nothing has ever really changed. Why? The starting point of whatever revolutions that have gone before has never considered All Equally as One but has always been based on separation. From the starting point of separation we can only create separation and that's why nothing has never really changed. For real change to happen, we must change our starting point from separation to consideration of All Life as Equals.
WeiWuHere 1 year ago
@WeiWuHere Would you not consider the anarchical-socialist post-revolutionary Spain, "the Second Republic", as a accurate example of a 'All Equality' revolution?
diceyLee 1 year ago
@diceyLee I have no idea of that. So i can not really say anything about it. But if it does not take into consideration of all beings as equals and understand that we all have the same basic needs as food, clothing, shelting, education and medical care etc and allow all beings to have equal access to these, then it won't be 'All Equality'.
WeiWuHere 1 year ago
Systemic war isnt apart of Marx iv read (can you provide ref. for me), it sounds a hell of alot like Orwell's or Trotsky's writings on communism.... I agree that Marx's communism solution to Capitalism is unachievable as a whole.
But what would you say to Orwell when he says: (cont....)
diceyLee 1 year ago
@diceyLee I don't know about Orwell or Trotsky. My understanding is based on textbooks of Marxist philosophy used in China. About the view of violent revolution in Marxism, you can have a glance at The Communist Manifesto (on wiki). In part IV "Position of the Communists in Relation to the Various Opposition Parties" -- "The Communists disdain to conceal their views and aims. They openly declare that their ends can be attained only by the forcible overthrow of all existing social conditions..."
WeiWuHere 1 year ago
Thanks for sharing.
It is a crucial understanding that our starting POINT is from the MIND Consciousness of GREED, POWER / ENERGY, which is based on POLARITY to achieved SELF's victory is SELF's LIMITation.
NOBEL prize or CONFUCIUS prize?????????????????
Fuck Up LIFE = MAD
WTF!
kiengb 1 year ago